Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2020 Mar 24;13(3):e232421. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232421

Synchronous metaplastic breast carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma: a rare case and review of the literature

Rebecca Lane 1,#, Felicia Yan 1,✉,#, Daniel Higgins 1, Gauri Agarwal 1
PMCID: PMC7103841  PMID: 32209575

Abstract

Synchronous primary cancers occur in 1.7% of breast cancer cases and metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) occurs in less than 1% of breast cancer cases. We present a previously healthy 66-year-old woman diagnosed with MBC after surgical resection of a presumed cyst. A second primary cancer, multifocal lung adenocarcinoma, was discovered during the staging process for her MBC. Remarkably she had not experienced pulmonary or constitutional symptoms at the time of diagnosis. She received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin, followed by immunotherapy with nivolumab. At 24 months of follow-up after her initial diagnosis, she was breast cancer-free with stable pulmonary nodules. This case highlights that rather than assuming multifocal lesions represent metastasis, biopsies should be considered as clinical management could be significantly altered in the presence of a synchronous cancer. Furthermore, platinum-based chemotherapy agents have potential to be considered in the treatment of MBC.

Keywords: breast cancer, chemotherapy, lung cancer (oncology)

Background

Breast cancer is a heavily researched and advanced area of oncology, with current US 5-year survival rates of 99% and 90% in localised and all stages of female breast cancer, respectively.1 However, the literature concerning the management of breast cancer and another synchronous primary cancer is limited. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme defines synchronous primary cancers as those diagnosed within 2 months of each other, and 1.7% of index breast cancer cases present with another synchronous cancer.2 We report a case in which a largely asymptomatic woman was unexpectedly diagnosed with a rare form of primary breast cancer, metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC), and then discovered to have a synchronous primary lung cancer. She was successfully managed with lumpectomy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy and in remission 24 months after her initial diagnosis.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old healthy woman presented for surgical excision of a cystic lesion of her right breast after fluid re-accumulation after two aspirations. Her screening mammogram within the past year was classified as BI-RADS 2, benign. She had no personal history of breast cancer or family history of cancer. Her medical history and review of systems were unremarkable, although she had a 35-pack-year history of smoking. On physical examination, there was a smooth-walled, mobile lesion of the right breast located at the 5:00 axis, 3 cm from the nipple. No skin dimpling or nipple discharge was noted.

Resected pathology revealed a 1.8×1.5×1.5 cm metaplastic carcinoma with squamous differentiation and lymphovascular invasion, a Nottingham score of 9 and triple-negative status (estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative and Her2-neu-negative). This pathology was confirmed at a second institution. The surgical margins were uninvolved, and subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative, 0/3 nodes. The patient’s MBC was ascribed American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I, pT1cN0M0.

However, as part of the staging process, a positron emission tomography (PET)–CT showed multiple hypermetabolic pulmonary nodules throughout her right lung. At this time, the patient denied any cardiopulmonary symptoms including chest pain, haemoptysis, cough or shortness of breath. She also denied constitutional symptoms such as fever, fatigue, chills, loss of appetite, weight loss or malaise. Biopsy of one nodule revealed primary lung adenocarcinoma, staining CK7, TTF-1 and napsin-A positive. Mediastinal and hilar thoracic lymph nodes were negative by PET–CT. The patient declined surgical mediastinal nodal sampling. She was diagnosed with a synchronous primary lung adenocarcinoma, ascribed AJCC stage IIIA, T4N0M0.

Treatment

Bilateral breast MRI with and without contrast 1 month after lumpectomy showed residual seroma without residual neoplasm or other suspicious findings in the breast. The patient was treated with six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin to simultaneously target her breast and lung cancers. Radiation therapy was not administered because the incremental benefit on the breast cancer was considered small in the setting of synchronous multifocal lung cancer and chemotherapy. Interval chest CT showed no change in the multiple pulmonary nodules postchemotherapy. The tumour PD-L1 status was assessed to determine if second-line immunotherapy for the lung adenocarcinoma was a possibility versus surveillance. The patient was found to have a favourable PD-L1 score (85% positive) so nivolumab immunotherapy every 2 weeks was initiated. Interval chest CT after four cycles of nivolumab showed that the biopsied nodule had nearly resolved with additional stable lesions of scarring present. Nivolumab was continued every 2 weeks but was stopped after 16 cycles due to the patient developing hepatitis thought to be a side effect of the medication.

Outcome and follow-up

At 24 months of follow-up after her initial diagnosis, the patient continued to be breast cancer-free with stable pulmonary nodules, as evidenced by bilateral breast MRI and chest CT surveillance, respectively.

Discussion

According to epidemiologists from the American Cancer Society, 279 100 new cases of breast cancer will occur in 2020 in USA.1 MBC is rare, accounting for 0.25%–1% of breast cancers diagnosed annually, or approximately 700–2790 new cases.3 Metaplastic breast cancer is classified as a distinct pathologic entity by the WHO and characterised by mixed epithelial and sarcomatoid histology.4 Only two other case reports of MBC synchronous with another primary cancer have been reported in the literature, which are summarised in table 1. Li and Wei presented a 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with synchronous MBC and an ovarian teratoma.5 She underwent modified radical mastectomy of the affected breast, excision of the ovarian teratoma and chemotherapy, after which she remained relapse-free for 10 months of follow-up. Klairmont et al presented a 74-year-old woman with four synchronous primary malignancies: MBC, lung, colon and oesophagus.6 She underwent single-stage breast lumpectomy and wide wedge resection of the lung adenocarcinoma, followed by sigmoidectomy and eventually oesophagectomy. She received chemotherapy intentionally tailored to target multiple malignancies and remained clinically disease-free for 18 months of follow-up.

Table 1.

Summary of case reports of MBC synchronous with another cancer

Case report Lane and Yan et al (present study) Klairmont et al6 Li and Wei5
Patient characteristics 66-year-old woman
PMH: unremarkable
SH: current smoker (35 pack-years)
FH: negative for cancer
74-year-old woman
PMH: basal cell carcinoma
SH: former smoker (40 pack-years, quit 17 years prior)
FH: breast cancer (sister, died, age 35 years), lung cancer (father, died, age 76 years)
55-year-old woman
PMH: unremarkable
FH: negative for breast cancer
Clinical presentation Cyst-like lesion of the right breast discovered by self-exam, otherwise asymptomatic Lesion of the right breast discovered during routine screening mammogram Hard mass of the right breast discovered by self-exam, otherwise asymptomatic
Primary diagnosis MBC, stage I*, pT1cN0M0 MBC, likely stage IIB*, T2N1M0 MBC, stage IIA*, pT2N0M0
Synchronous cancer(s) Lung adenocarcinoma Lung squamous cell carcinoma, colonic adenocarcinoma, oesophageal adenocarcinoma Ovarian teratoma
Staging modalities PET–CT, sentinel lymph node biopsy CXR, CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, PET–CT CT abdomen, axillary lymph node dissection
Treatment for MBC R breast lumpectomy followed by chemotherapy R breast lumpectomy followed by chemotherapy R breast modified radical mastectomy followed by chemotherapy
Outcome Cancer-free ×24-month follow-up Cancer-free ×18-month follow-up Cancer-free ×10-month follow-up

*based on AJCC staging

CT, computed tomography; CXR, chest X-ray; FH, family history; MBC, metaplastic breast carcinoma; PET, positron emission tomography; PMH, past medical history; R, right; SH, social history.

While certain cancer syndromes have been well established, for example BRCA1/2 and Li–Fraumeni syndrome, there is no well-recognised relationship between breast cancer and lung cancer in the US population. However, Lin et al recently reported an association between breast cancer and synchronous lung cancer in women in a large Taiwanese cohort.7

Our patient’s clinical presentation was unusual. MBC typically presents as a rapidly growing, large breast mass.3 4 Our patient’s MBC presented as a relatively small cyst-like lesion. Despite a history of smoking and the presence of primary lung cancer, she did not experience pulmonary symptoms and despite the presence of two primary malignancies, our patient had no constitutional symptoms.

MBC is an aggressive breast cancer with increased likelihood of metastasis without involvement of regional lymph nodes due to haematogenous spread.3 4 8 9 For this reason, we performed a PET–CT as part of the staging process for our patient despite a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. The presence of multiple lung lesions in our patient was initially concerning for metastasis. However, similar cases of synchronous breast cancer (all histological types) and multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas have been reported.10 11 Therefore, it is critical to consider biopsy of multifocal lesions rather than assuming they represent metastases, as our biopsy results drastically altered our patient’s treatment plan.

There is no standard treatment regimen for MBC. Remarkably, evidence regarding the surgical approach is similar to that of other types of breast cancer despite its more aggressive nature. For early and locally advanced disease, mastectomy for large tumours (typically >5 cm) or breast-conserving surgery for small tumours has demonstrated no difference in overall or disease-specific survival in a retrospective study of MBC patients.12 In another retrospective study, adjuvant radiation therapy provided an overall survival benefit but not a disease-specific survival benefit in both mastectomy and lumpectomy patients.13

Standard chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer, consists of anthracycline-based/taxane-based regimens.14 In contrast, first-line treatment for advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based chemotherapy.15 Of note, a few randomised clinical trials have shown that adding platinum-based agents to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer improves the rate of pathologic complete response.16 17 Additionally, Takuwa et al presented a patient with stage IIA MBC who exhibited a near pathologic complete response to platinum-based preoperative chemotherapy.18 In contrast, Keramati et al presented a patient with stage IIIA MBC who received preoperative chemotherapy without a platinum agent (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel) which resulted in minimal tumour response.19 Our patient was treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Considering the evidence from these studies along with our case, platinum-based chemotherapy agents should be considered in the treatment of MBC. Because MBC tends to be triple-negative, hormonal therapies are rarely used and chemotherapy is a mainstay.4 Case series of patients with MBC suggest improved breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival in patients with MBC who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who did not.4 MBC has a relatively low 5-year survival rate of 49%–69%.20

Nivolumab immunotherapy has not been shown to be superior to platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC in a prospective, randomised clinical trial.21 However, NSCLC high tumour burden and a PD-L1 expression level ≥50% are hypothesised to predict a higher response rate to nivolumab, as was demonstrated in our patient.21 Vogt et al suggest basic principles when designing treatment plans for synchronous primary malignancies, including determining the most significant tumour in terms of prognosis, tumour profiling to identify common targets and selecting systemic therapy active against both malignancies.22

In summary, this case emphasises the unusual presentation and successful management of a 66-year-old woman with metaplastic breast cancer and synchronous primary lung cancer. Evidence-based clinical guidelines are absent given the rarity of such cases; thus, we hope this report will serve as a useful adjunct to the current literature.

Patient’s perspective.

I am grateful for the research, innovative treatments and wonderful physicians that, today, enable me to feel good and lead an active life, at 68 years, 2 years after my initial diagnosis of MBC and subsequently, the separate lung cancer diagnosis. With ongoing monitoring of blood, PET and CT scans I look forward to continuing successful management.

Learning points.

  • Early stage metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) may present as an asymptomatic cyst-like lesion.

  • Multifocal pulmonary lesions should be biopsied rather than assumed to represent metastasis.

  • Chemotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with MBC and advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

  • Platinum-based chemotherapy agents have potential to be considered in the treatment of MBC.

  • Second-line immunotherapy with nivolumab for lung adenocarcinoma can be considered depending on the tumour’s PD-L1 status.

Footnotes

RL and FY contributed equally.

Contributors: All the authors meet authorship criteria. FY made substantial contributions to the design of the work and acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. RL made substantial contributions to the conception of the work and acquisition and analysis of the data. DH made substantial contributions to the conception of the work and acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. GA made substantial contributions to the conception of the work and interpretation of the data. FY had roles in drafting the work and revising it critically. RL had a role in drafting the work. DH and GA had roles in revising the work critically. All authors approve of the work to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent for publication: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7–30. 10.3322/caac.21590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, et al. Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (seer) program. Oncologist 2007;12:20–37. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McKinnon E, Xiao P. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:819–22. 10.5858/arpa.2013-0358-RS [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tzanninis I-G, Kotteas EA, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, et al. Management and outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2016;16:437–43. 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li S, Wei Q-Z. Metaplastic carcinoma of the right breast and simultaneous giant ovarian teratoma: a case report. Chin J Cancer 2012;31:500–4. 10.5732/cjc.012.10118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klairmont M, Kopkash K, Favuzza J, et al. Four synchronous primary malignancies of the breast, lung, colon and esophagus. Anticancer Res 2015;35:6159–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin EP-Y, Lin C-H, Yang C-Y, et al. Population-Based cohort study reveals distinct associations between female lung cancer and breast cancer in Taiwan. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018;2:1–14. 10.1200/CCI.18.00065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ong CT, Campbell BM, Thomas SM, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer treatment and outcomes in 2500 patients: a retrospective analysis of a national oncology database. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:2249–60. 10.1245/s10434-018-6533-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol 1999;10:413–9. 10.1023/A:1008329910362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takada K, Kashiwagi S, Amano R, et al. [A Case of Synchronous Triple Cancer of the Breast, Duodenal and Lung]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2017;44:1074–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin B, Zhang S, Chuang X, et al. Breast cancer and synchronous multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas with heterogeneous mutations: a case report. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1138–018. 10.1186/s12885-018-5011-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dave G, Cosmatos H, Do T, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:771–5. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tseng WH, Martinez SR. Metaplastic breast cancer: to radiate or not to radiate? Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:94–103. 10.1245/s10434-010-1198-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kumar P, Aggarwal R. An overview of triple-negative breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:247–69. 10.1007/s00404-015-3859-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rossi A, Chiodini P, Sun J-M, et al. Six versus fewer planned cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1254–62. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70402-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:747–56. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70160-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2015;33:13–21. 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takuwa H, Ueno T, Ishiguro H, et al. A case of metaplastic breast cancer that showed a good response to platinum-based preoperative chemotherapy. Breast Cancer 2014;21:504–7. 10.1007/s12282-011-0269-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Keramati A, Shandiz FH, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinoma with osseous remnant post standard treatment of invasive ductal carcinoma: case report and review of literature. Eur J Oncol Invalid date Invalid date;23:52–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leyrer CM, Berriochoa CA, Agrawal S, et al. Predictive factors on outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017;165:499–504. 10.1007/s10549-017-4367-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carbone DP, Reck M, Paz-Ares L, et al. First-Line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2415–26. 10.1056/NEJMoa1613493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open 2017;2:e000172–2017. 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES