Highlights
-
•
Trichomonads represent emerging species of medical and veterinary importance.
-
•
Clinical and molecular evidence suggest a zoonotic potential for trichomonads.
-
•
Close relationship between avian and human trichomonads revealed in outbreaks.
Keywords: Trichomonas, zoonosis, emerging infectious disease, bird disease
Abstract
Trichomonads are common parasites of many vertebrate and invertebrate species, with four species classically recognized as human parasites: Dientamoeba fragilis, Pentatrichomonas hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Trichomonas tenax. The latter two species are considered human-specific; by contrast, D. fragilis and P. hominis have been isolated from domestic and farm mammals, demonstrating a wide host range and potential zoonotic origin. Several new studies have highlighted the zoonotic dimension of trichomonads. First, species typically known to infect birds and domestic mammals have been identified in human clinical samples. Second, several phylogenetic analyses have identified animal-derived trichomonads as close sister taxa of the two human-specific species. It is our opinion, therefore, that these observations prompt further investigation into the importance of zoonotic trichomonads for human health.
The trichomonad lineage in phylum Parabasalia
Trichomonads are anaerobic, flagellated protists belonging to the large and diverse groups Trichomonadea and Tritrichomonadea of phylum Parabasalia [1]. They are characterized by the presence of three to five anterior flagella, hydrogenosomes – hydrogen-producing organelles corresponding to anaerobic versions of mitochondria [2], a parabasal body (a large Golgi), and a complex cytoskeleton. A few species have been isolated from environmental samples and may represent free-living species; however, the majority of species form symbiotic interactions (see Glossary) with various animal hosts. Among the parasitic trichomonads, several species inhabit the oral, digestive, and urogenital tracts of invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, including livestock, pets, and humans.
Glossary.
Commensal: a form of symbiosis between two organisms where one derives benefit, whereas the other is unaffected. Some gut trichomonads are thought to represent commensals.
Disease incidence: the number of new disease cases that occur in a population for a given time period (typically per year).
Dysbiosis: an imbalance of the microbiota (the microbial populations at a particular body site of an animal host) that leads, or predisposes, the host to disease conditions [60].
Emerging infectious disease: outbreaks of previously unknown diseases or known diseases that show an increase in incidence, expansion in geographical range, or spread to a new population. Emerging infections can be caused by previously unknown or undetected infectious agents, newly evolved strains, environmental changes, and changes in human demography [51]. A recent review found that over 60% of human emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin [53]. Examples include influenza, HIV/AIDS, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus.
Intermediate host: a host in or on which a pathogen spends a part of its life, usually a transition period, but does not reach sexual maturity.
Mutualism (mutualist): a form of symbiosis between two organisms in which both benefit from the relationship. Some gut parabasalids from termites are thought to represent mutualists [80].
Opportunistic: a potential pathogen that typically does not cause disease in a healthy host, but can in particular situations cause disease, for example, owing to the compromised immune system (e.g., attributable to AIDS, chemotherapy, or malnutrition) of the host. Lung trichomonads represent probable opportunistic infections – see main text.
Parasitic (parasite): a non-mutual symbiosis between two species where one, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the other, the host. Parasites typically do not kill their hosts but exploit them for resources necessary for their survival. Obligate parasites cannot complete their life cycles and reproduce without a suitable host.
Pathogenic (pathogen): a broad term that refers to the ability of an organism to cause disease. It is typically used to describe an infectious agent or microorganism, such as a bacterium, protist, virus, etc., that causes disease in its host. Some pathogens, for example, protists Acanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria fowleri and fungi Aspergillus spp. are free-living species thriving in the environment and occasionally infect humans, often in an opportunistic manner in compromised hosts [59].
Pathogenicity: the ability of a pathogen to overcome host defenses and cause disease.
Re-emerging infectious disease: the reappearance of a historically known infectious disease after a significant decline in incidence. Acquired resistance of pathogens to antimicrobial medications is an important factor in the re-emergence of many diseases. Examples include West Nile virus, cholera, MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus).
Reservoir: the habitat or host that harbors an infectious agent, where it can live, grow, and multiply. Reservoirs can include humans, animals, and serve as a source of potential disease outbreaks.
Symbiosis: a close and often long-term relationship between two or more different biological species. These relationships can be obligate or facultative, mutualistic, commensalistic, or parasitic.
Transmission: the passing of an infectious agent from one host to another host. Direct transmission routes include: physical contact, contact with a contaminated environment or surface, airborne transmission, and fecal–oral transmission. Indirect transmission routes involve another organism such as an insect vector or intermediate host.
Vector: an organism that carries and transmits a pathogen from an infected individual to another individual.
Virulence: a property of a pathogen, such as specific structural elements or biochemical compounds commonly called virulence factors that cause a reduction in host fitness or damage to the host. It is now recognized that virulence is multifactorial and involves characteristics of both the pathogen and its host, which influence the outcome of their interaction and hence the observed virulence (e.g., an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients) [59].
Zoonosis: an infectious organism, such as a bacterium, virus, parasite, or fungus, transmissible between wildlife or domesticated animals and humans. Examples include: (i) the Lyme disease bacterium Borrelia transmitted to humans by ticks from a natural reservoir in rodents; (ii) the malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi transmitted by Anopheles vectors that causes malaria in monkeys and humans; and (iii) Cryptosporidium parvum, a parasite found in cats, dogs, and farmed animals and transmitted as a cyst in contaminated water, food, or through the fecal–oral route. Zoonoses are the leading cause of emerging infectious diseases worldwide, responsible for devastating disease outbreaks, mortality, and serious socioeconomic consequences 21, 56, 79.
Zoonotic potential: the potential for infectious diseases of wildlife or domestic animals to be transmitted to humans.
Historically, phylum Parabasalia was divided into two groups based on morphological characteristics; however, the recent inclusion of molecular data recovered six groups: Trichomonadea, Tritrichomonadea, Hypotrichomonadea, Cristamonadea, Spirotrichonymphea, and Trichonymphea [3]. The Trichomonadea, Tritrichomonadea, and Hypotrichomonadea are of primary concern to parasitologists; however, the evolutionary relationships within and between these groups are unclear [4]. Several molecular phylogenies have attempted to resolve these evolutionary relationships using phylogenetic markers such as ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and protein coding genes (Figure 1 ), which give inconsistent phylogenies 4, 5.
Four species of trichomonad are considered human parasites: Trichomonas vaginalis (found in the urogenital tract) [6], Trichomonas tenax (localized to the oral cavity) [7], and Pentatrichomonas hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis (located in the digestive tract) 8, 9. Only one species has well-established pathogenic potential: T. vaginalis, the cause of the most prevalent non-viral sexually transmitted infection in humans, trichomoniasis [10]. Only T. vaginalis and T. tenax are considered human-specific, with the former characterized by the richest, although still limited, epidemiology data [11], but very little is known about the latter. P. hominis and D. fragilis can cause gastrointestinal symptoms in some patients, such as abdominal pain and diarrhea 8, 12, D. fragilis has also been proffered as a potential causative agent of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) 13, 14, but debate surrounds its pathogenicity, infection route, and epidemiology [15]. In addition, several trichomonad species are of veterinary importance, such as the avian pathogens Trichomonas gallinae, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum, and Histomonas meleagridis 16, 17, 18, 19, and Tritrichomonas foetus, the causative agent of a venereal disease in cattle [20]. This extensive host range, along with the isolation of D. fragilis [21] and P. hominis [22] from various animal hosts, suggests that certain species of trichomonads may exhibit the characteristics of zoonoses. Although the question of zoonotic trichomonads has been considered for some years (e.g., 23, 24), recent results from several different sources have highlighted this potential. Here we summarize the clinical and phylogenetic studies that suggest a zoonotic potential for trichomonads, discuss their implications for human health, and the next steps required for investigation into their epidemiology, pathobiology and evolution.
New evidence supports the zoonotic potential of trichomonads
Human trichomonad infections are not body site-specific
The four trichomonad species recognized as human parasites were initially thought to be site-specific [25] (Table 1 ). However, various clinical studies have shown that they can also be found in atypical locations. For example, T. tenax, a commensal of the human mouth found in patients with poor oral hygiene [7], has been identified by microscopic and molecular methods in the upper and lower respiratory tracts 26, 27. One possibility that could account from this ‘aberrant’ location is inhalation of the parasite from the oral cavity into the respiratory tract. However, in some cases where T. tenax was identified in the respiratory tract, no parasites were found in the mouth [26]. Other human trichomonad species have also been identified in the respiratory tract including the sexually transmitted species T. vaginalis 28, 29 and the gut parasite P. hominis [30], which suggests that these species too can proliferate outside their usual body sites.
Table 1.
Species | Primary hostb; infection site | Host range; infection site | Diagnostic method used to detect in other hosts or sites | Clinical conditionsc | Refs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trichomonas vaginalis | Human; UGT | Humans; RT | PCR and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region | Trichomoniasis, pulmonary infections, AIDS | 10, 27, 28 |
Trichomonas tenax | Human; DT and buccal cavity | Humans; RT | PCR and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region | Salivary trichomonosis, pulmonary infections | 7, 25, 26 |
Dientamoeba fragilis | Humans; DT | Humans and other mammals; DT | Fecal smears, PCR, and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region, 18S rRNA | Chronic diarrhea, IBS | 13, 14, 21 |
Pentatrichomonas hominis | Not known; DT | Humans and other mammals; DT | Fecal smears, PCR, and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region | Diarrhea, pulmonary infections, rheumatoid arthritis | 8, 30, 33 |
Tritrichomonas foetus | Bovine; UGT, DT | Humans and other mammals; RT | PCR and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region, EF-1α gene, and TR7/TR8 variable length region | Pulmonary infections, AIDS | 20, 38, 41 |
Tetratrichomonas gallinarum | Birds; DT | Birds, humans; RT | PCR and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region | Pulmonary infections | 24, 44 |
Tetratrichomonas sp. | Not known | Humans; RT | PCR and sequencing of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 rRNA region | Pulmonary infections | 24, 43 |
Abbreviations: DT, digestive tract; UGT, urogenital tract; RT, respiratory tract; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; PcP, Pneumocystis pneumonia; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome.
The primary host may not represent the true natural history of the species, which may have a broader host range.
Pulmonary infections include PcP, ARDS-associated infections, pneumonia, and can lead to empyema.
At least five species of trichomonad, including P. hominis, T. tenax, T. vaginalis, T. foetus, and T. gallinarum, have been identified in the human respiratory tract and as causative agents of pulmonary trichomoniasis (Table 1). They have been found in up to 60% of patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) and in up to 30% of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [31]. Because trichomonads are microaerophilic it is unlikely that they initiate and cause these diseases themselves, but may represent secondary and opportunistic infections that could exacerbate symptoms and prolong illness [23]. These trichomonad respiratory infections seem to depend upon: (i) the presence of bacteria on which to feed and (ii) local anaerobic conditions caused by PcP or ARDS-associated infections [32] but not necessarily upon immunosuppression, because drugs against PcP consistently cure patients of pulmonary trichomonosis and, in one study, treated ARDS patients were not found to be immunocompromised [25]. Thus, the presence of an increasing number of distinct trichomonads in a broader range of clinical samples from patients with diverse diseases, such as AIDS, rheumatoid arthritis, prostate cancer, pulmonary infections (empyema and pneumonia in addition to PcP and ARDS), and digestive conditions such as diarrhea and IBS 33, 34, 35, is becoming increasingly apparent. Indeed, the frequency of pulmonary trichomonosis infections may be higher than reported because transformation of parasites from the motile, pear-shaped stage to the amoeboid stage renders microscopic identification in clinical samples difficult [31], highlighting the importance of molecular data to identify such infections [25].
Non-human species of trichomonad have been isolated from clinical samples
Trichomonads were thought to have strict host specificity [25]; however, trichomonad parasites not previously reported as infecting humans have recently been found in human clinical samples (Table 1). For example, parasites belonging to the genus Tritrichomonas can be isolated from the reproductive tract of cattle (Tritrichomonas foetus), the nasal mucosa and intestine of pigs (Tritrichomonas suis), and the intestine of non-human primates (Tritrichomonas mobilensis) [20]. Another example is T. foetus, historically considered specific to cattle 25, 36. Nonetheless, experimental cross-infections of the parasites between pigs and cattle in addition to analysis of molecular data suggest that these three species should be considered strains of the same species 20, 37. In addition, several different genotypes of T. foetus have been identified as causing diarrhea in cats in ∼12 countries 38, 39 and have also been isolated from dogs with diarrhea [40]. Moreover, in several new clinical cases, T. foetus or T. foetus-like organisms have unexpectedly been identified in the lungs of human patients [41]. Such findings suggest that T. foetus is a zoonotic parasite capable of colonizing an extensive range of hosts and body sites.
Other examples of species of non-human trichomonads recently found to infect humans are members of the genus Tetratrichomonas, currently the largest genus in phylum Parabasalia. Tetratrichomonas species are found in the small intestine of a wide spectrum of invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, such as leeches, birds, and rodents [42]. Indeed, some species of tetratrichomonad are known to infect a wide range of unrelated hosts, such as Tetratrichomonas prowazeki, which has been found in species of amphibians and reptiles [42]. Another example, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum, is primarily thought of as an avian parasite of the digestive tract in domestic and wild birds [43], although its pathogenicity is not well established [17]. However, several recent studies have identified Tetratrichomonas strains isolated from human lungs or the human oral cavity as T. gallinarum or T. gallinarum-like organisms 24, 44, 45. Studies have also shown that genus Tetratrichomonas is much more diverse than previously thought and that T. gallinarum comprises at least three cryptic species with variable host specificity, some that represent human isolates 24, 43. Notably, experiments failed to transmit two Tetratrichomonas of human origin to birds, although the authors suggest this result could be explained by either adaptation of the T. gallinarum-like trichomonads to the human host or extensive in vitro culturing, so that infection of birds was no longer biologically achievable [24].
Molecular phylogenies reveal close relationships between human and avian trichomonads
Recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of trichomonads using rRNA and protein coding genes (e.g., Rpb1) has begun to answer important questions regarding trichomonad phylogeny. Rpb1 is a ubiquitous eukaryotic gene coding for the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and is present as a single copy in many eukaryotes. A recent analysis of Rpb1 generated a fully resolved phylogeny of Trichomonadea, Tritrichomonadea, and Hypotrichomonadea, and species and isolates within these groups (Figure 2 ) [5]. Interestingly, the phylogeny recovered some avian isolates of Trichomonas spp. as sister taxa to T. vaginalis, and T. tenax as closely related to T. gallinae; these findings are consistent with previous phylogenies based upon rRNA and other protein coding genes 24, 46, 47, 48. The common ancestor to this complex is also related to the avian T. gallinarum (e.g., [42]). These new phylogenies complicate the inferred relationship between T. vaginalis and T. tenax, which on the basis of host specificity might be expected to be sister taxa [47]. In this scenario, an ancestor of both species infected humans and subsequently differentiated into two distinct species with different body site preferences. However, the phylogenetic data suggest the zoonotic transfer of trichomonad parasites from humans to birds, and/or vice versa, on at least two occasions, or a combination of these events.
Other studies investigating outbreaks of avian trichomonosis in wild birds, primarily attributed to T. gallinae infections, have also confirmed the close relationship between avian and human trichomonads [48]. Epidemic infections by T. gallinae of passerine species in Europe have recently been described and associated with high mortality and population decline [18]. This dramatic case of disease emergence demonstrates the potential for a trichomonad to jump host species (columbiform to passerine) and spread rapidly through populations. The disease is thought to have been initiated and spread through transfer of the parasite via contaminated water and bird feeders, as well as through direct contact between passerines [17]. Furthermore, the recent isolation and preliminary characterization of Trichomonas stableri associated with epidemic mortality in California Band-tail pigeons suggest that avian trichomonosis may be caused by pathogens other than T. gallinae and H. meleagridis 17, 49. Genetic analysis at multiple loci indicated T. stableri to be more closely related to T. vaginalis than to the bird-associated T. gallinae [49] (Figure 2), further supporting the hypothesis that trichomonads are crossing host boundaries. Generating genetic markers and whole genome sequences of T. stableri and other T. vaginalis-like isolates derived from cases of epidemic avian trichomonosis will provide important insight into the evolution and origins of these pathogens. For example, does the Trichomonas sp. isolate from a white-winged pigeon extremely closely related to isolates of T. vaginalis represent a case of human to bird transfer (accession HM016231 in Figure 2)?
The implications of zoonotic trichomonads for human health
According to current disease dynamic models, the zoonotic emergence of parasitic diseases in humans is typically associated with several characteristics, including broad host range, genetic variability, presence of genotypes better suited to the parasitism of humans, and modified pathogenic potential [50]. Emergent zoonoses are thought to appear through a number of different stages, for example, some develop as animal ‘parasitoses’ that are newly transmissible to humans, although the source of the disease remains the animal reservoir 50, 51. In other cases, parasites are able to cross the species barrier, modify their specificity, and become sustainably transmissible from human to human 50, 52, 53. The evolution of these emergent parasitoses is not linear, and an explanation for such a complex process requires consideration of the multi-host ecology and complex dynamics of zoonotic infections [54]. Based on these models and the clinical and molecular evidence discussed previously, it may be that several trichomonads are at different stages of zoonotic emergence (Figure 3 ). These observations raise important questions regarding the implications of the potential widening pathological spectrum of trichomonads in humans and suggest that owing to links with other diseases these parasites may be of greater medical importance than previously thought.
Historically, trichomonads have not been considered as emerging infections because of their site- and host-specific occurrence. Nonetheless, the presence of trichomonads in a diverse array of clinical disorders suggests that they may exhibit a form of opportunism and multiply when local conditions are favorable. For example, the diseases in which trichomonads are found as co-infecting agents in respiratory infections are probably not limited to PcP and ARDS-associated infections, but may include other pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis 31, 32. Overall, the high prevalence of pulmonary diseases globally [55] combined with the higher burden of both lung conditions and zoonotic diseases among people in resource-limited settings 55, 56 suggest that only the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of pulmonary trichomoniasis may currently be known. Digestive tract infections by trichomonads are also increasingly recognized as being common. Although the exact clinical profile of D. fragilis is still poorly understood some consider this species to have pathogenic capabilities [12], and recent studies have associated the rise of IBS with a high prevalence (∼40%) of D. fragilis in Europe [35]. However, the pathogenicity of D. fragilis has been questioned owing to the asymptomatic nature of many infections, and it is considered by some as a commensal of the intestinal flora [57]. Indeed, treatment of D. fragilis-infected children with metronidazole was not associated with better clinical outcomes [58].
Because association is not evidence for causality, additional data are required to establish the pathogenicity of trichomonads in the digestive tract and ‘aberrant’ body sites such as the lungs. In this context, it is important to consider characteristics of both host and parasite with regard to the outcome of their interactions. For example, one extreme is represented by severely immune-compromised patients that are more susceptible to a wider range of microbial infections compared with immunocompetent hosts [59]. When studying the outcome of human–microbe interactions, a complex interplay among viruses, bacteria and archaea, microbial eukaryotes, and animal parasites influence the health status of the human host, with mucosal microbiota playing a key role influencing health and disease status 60, 61. Based on these considerations and examples, trichomonads may be more prevalent and have a wider pathological spectrum in humans than currently recognized, influencing human health through direct pathologies but also indirectly through dysbiosis of the mucosal microbiota and local inflammation, facilitating transmission of pathogens – a prime example being T. vaginalis infection and bacterial vaginosis contributing to HIV transmission 61, 62. The potential influence of gut trichomonads to human health will also have to consider their potential impact on the gut microbiota, which might explain observations of the association between D. fragilis and IBS through inducing gut dysbiosis [35]. Indeed, the ability of trichomonads to live on a variety of mucosal tissues may be the key to their wide host range and ability to develop infections at different body sites, as well as contribute directly or indirectly to pathologies. Once the capacity to thrive on vertebrate mucosal surfaces has developed, there may be less of a barrier to cross both species and mucosal sites. For example, in the case of T. foetus, this sexually transmitted species may represent a recent transfer from the digestive to the urogenital tract, with a capacity of the parasite to thrive in the gut in different species (e.g., pigs, cats, and dogs).
Investigating trichomonads as emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses
Trichomonads provide a unique system for the study of the origins and pathobiology of zoonotic and emerging infectious diseases. In addition, they have attracted interest as model systems for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics 63, 64, and for biochemical, molecular, and cell biology investigations 2, 65, 66. The T. vaginalis genome sequence published in 2007 was the first species of trichomonad to be sequenced [67], and others are currently underway including isolates of T. foetus, P. hominis, T. gallinae, and T. tenax. These sequences will enable comparative analysis of common and unique parasitic modes of life cycle, and possible adaptive mechanisms. For example, T. vaginalis and T. foetus appear to have evolved independently to colonize the urogenital tracts of different mammalian hosts [68]. In addition, T. foetus has been isolated from the digestive tract of cats and dogs, indicating that it is capable of colonizing a broad range of hosts and environments [69]. These two species of sexually transmitted trichomonad probably represent cases of convergent evolution and provide an opportunity to compare the derived similarities and the origins of these traits that coincide with a shared niche.
Species of trichomonad exhibit a range of genome sizes, from ∼94 Mb for the P. hominis genome to ∼177 Mb for the T. foetus genome [70]. The T. vaginalis genome sequence revealed the ∼160-Mb genome to be a result of expanded transposable elements and protein coding gene families, including those responsible for interaction of the parasite with its immediate environment 71, 72, 73. It has been hypothesized that the large genome size may be a recent event that occurred when the most recent common ancestor of T. vaginalis underwent a population bottleneck during its transition from the digestive tract to the urogenital tract. Because genome size is positively associated with cell volume, an increase in genome size and concomitant increase in cell size might have increased its phagocytic potential as well as surface area for the interaction of the parasite with host cell tissue 67, 73. In this context, it will be particularly interesting to compare the genomes of T. vaginalis with its closely related isolates and species derived from birds (Figure 2) to gain detailed insight into correlations between genome evolution and how this might relate to parasite pathobiology in humans and birds. Lateral gene transfers from bacterial donors sometime in the evolutionary past have also importantly influenced the evolution of T. vaginalis protein coding genes 63, 67. For example, the parasite has gained an almost complete pathway for the degradation of complex glycans present in host mucosal secretions, factors which may contribute to its adaptive potential and pathogenicity 61, 63. Comparison of a broad range of trichomonad genomes will help test this hypothesis and may pinpoint gene families whose acquisition and/or expansions correlate with pathogenicity and facilitated or mediated transitions from: (i) an ancestral animal-only stage to human-inclusive infections or (ii) from the digestive to urogenital tracts.
Trichomonads also provide a unique system to study the features of a zoonotic lifestyle via comparative examination of molecular and cellular characteristics. For example, successful T. vaginalis infections are probably favored by virulence mechanisms such as cytoadherence and phagocytosis 72, 73. The ∼60 000 predicted protein coding genes of T. vaginalis [67] includes a plethora of candidate genes for surface molecules mediating interaction with host tissues and membrane trafficking and signaling, important processes involved in parasite pathobiology 72, 73. Cysteine proteases in particular have been identified as virulence factors central to the host–pathogen interface in T. vaginalis 61, 72, 73, 74, 75. Transcriptomic studies have shown upregulation of some of these T. vaginalis virulence factors in response to contact with host cells in vitro [76] and have also documented their expression under in vitro growth conditions in T. foetus [69]. Similar to T. vaginalis, recent studies have shown the presence of cysteine proteases in the cell-free filtrate of T. gallinae and demonstrated their involvement in its in vitro cytopathogenic effects [77]. Mining other trichomonad genome data to identify important virulence proteins will improve our understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of infections and can be used to test hypotheses, such as whether zoonotic organisms show greater diversity in key virulence proteins underlying their capacity to parasitize a variety of host species and mucosal sites [78].
Concluding remarks and future perspectives
Although we have discussed several recent studies that provide strong evidence for the zoonotic origin and potential of trichomonads, regular and sustained zoonotic transmission of these microbes has yet to be definitively established. To improve our knowledge of the zoonotic origins of trichomonads, detailed investigations including systematic surveys of trichomonads in humans and animals will be required. Molecular methods have been instrumental in our understanding of the biology and complexity of trichomonads so far; however, more data and novel approaches are needed to resolve evolutionary relationships and to improve diagnostic tools. Wide sampling and whole genome sequencing of trichomonads, with subsequent comparative genomic investigations, will facilitate identifying the closest relatives of human trichomonad pathogens, providing a solid evolutionary framework for how these diseases have emerged and forming a basis for epidemiological studies across both animal (wild and domestic) and human hosts. Environmental studies such as the ‘Microbes, Sewage, Health and Disease’ metagenomics project in New York City (http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/nyu-stories/video--mapping-nyc-s-metagenome.html) will provide important information on potential transmission routes and the patterns, nature, and occurrence of trichomonad infections in humans, animals, and birds; and establish the importance of trichomonads zoonotic transmissions – as has been established for species of Trypanosoma, Cryptosporidium, and Toxoplasma [79]. Furthermore, studies investigating the potential pathogenicity of these parasites in various mucosae (respiratory, digestive, and urogenital) are needed to determine the clinical significance and public health implications of trichomonads. Accumulation of these different types of data will advance our understanding of parasite biology and infection mechanisms, and provide approaches towards developing drug targets and vaccine candidates for species of this increasingly recognized medically and veterinary important lineage.
Acknowledgments
We thank four anonymous referees for their constructive comments that allowed us to improve the manuscript. J.M.M. is supported by the MacCracken Program in the Graduate School of Arts and Science, and by a New York University Grand Challenge project. R.P.H. acknowledges past Wellcome Trust funding for his work on Trichomonas vaginalis.
References
- 1.Adl S.M. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2012;59:429–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Muller M. Biochemistry and evolution of anaerobic energy metabolism in eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012;76:444–495. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05024-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cepicka I. Critical taxonomic revision of parabasalids with description of one new genus and three new species. Protist. 2010;161:400–433. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Noda S. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of parabasalia with improved taxon sampling and new protein markers of actin and elongation factor-1α. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e29938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Malik S.B. Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs Rpb1, a single-copy gene. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kissinger P., Adamski A. Trichomoniasis and HIV interactions: a review. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2013;89:426–433. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-051005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duboucher C. Salivary trichomoniasis. A case report of infestation of a submaxillary gland by Trichomonas tenax. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1995;119:277–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meloni D. Molecular identification of Pentatrichomonas hominis in two patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011;64:933–935. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2011.089326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johnson E.H. Emerging from obscurity: biological, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of Dientamoeba fragilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:553–570. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.553-570.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hobbs M.M. Trichomonas vaginalis and trichomoniasis. In: Holmes K., editor. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill; 2008. pp. 771–793. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poole D.N., McClelland R.S. Global epidemiology of Trichomonas vaginalis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2013;89:418–422. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barratt J.L. A review of Dientamoeba fragilis carriage in humans: several reasons why this organism should be considered in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illness. Gut Microbes. 2011;2:3–12. doi: 10.4161/gmic.2.1.14755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hussein E.M. Genetic diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis isolates of irritable bowel syndrome patients by high-resolution melting-curve (HRM) analysis. Parasitol. Res. 2009;105:1053–1060. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1515-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stark D. A review of the clinical presentation of dientamoebiasis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010;82:614–619. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clark C.G. Transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis: pinworm or cysts? Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:136–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinson R.A. Emerging infectious disease leads to rapid population declines of common British birds. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amin A. Trichomonads in birds – a review. Parasitology. 2014;141:733–747. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013002096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lawson B. A clonal strain of Trichomonas gallinae is the aetiologic agent of an emerging avian epidemic disease. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011;11:1638–1645. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bilic I. Multi-locus typing of Histomonas meleagridis isolates demonstrates the existence of two different genotypes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Frey C.F., Muller N. Tritrichomonas–systematics of an enigmatic genus. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2012;26:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Caccio S.M. Pigs as natural hosts of Dientamoeba fragilis genotypes found in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012;18:838–841. doi: 10.3201/eid1805.111093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mostegl M.M. Detection of Tritrichomonas foetus and Pentatrichomonas hominis in intestinal tissue specimens of cats by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;183:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duboucher C. Frequency of trichomonads as coinfecting agents in Pneumocystis pneumonia. Acta Cytol. 2005;49:273–277. doi: 10.1159/000326149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kutisova K. Tetratrichomonads from the oral cavity and respiratory tract of humans. Parasitology. 2005;131:309–319. doi: 10.1017/s0031182005008000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duboucher C. Recent advances in pulmonary trichomonosis. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:201–202. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mallat H. Molecular characterization of Trichomonas tenax causing pulmonary infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:3886–3887. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3886-3887.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leterrier M. Trichomonads in pleural effusion: case report, literature review and utility of PCR for species identification. New Microbiol. 2012;35:83–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Duboucher C. Pulmonary coinfection by Trichomonas vaginalis and Pneumocystis sp. as a novel manifestation of AIDS. Hum. Pathol. 2003;34:508–511. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00088-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carter J.E., Whithaus K.C. Neonatal respiratory tract involvement by Trichomonas vaginalis: a case report and review of the literature. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008;78:17–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jongwutiwes S. Pentatrichomonas hominis in empyema thoracis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2000;94:185–186. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90270-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duboucher C. Trichomonads as superinfecting agents in Pneumocystis pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2006;53(Suppl. 1):S95–S97. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2006.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Duboucher C. Pulmonary superinfection by trichomonads in the course of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung. 2007;185:295–301. doi: 10.1007/s00408-007-9022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Compaore C. Pentatrichomonas hominis infection in rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Rheumatology. 2013;52:1534–1535. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sutcliffe S. Sexually transmitted infections and risk of prostate cancer: review of historical and emerging hypotheses. Future Oncol. 2010;6:1289–1311. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Engsbro A.L. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of intestinal parasites in Danish primary care patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;46:204–209. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.861609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dufernez F. Morphological and molecular identification of non-Tritrichomonas foetus trichomonad protozoa from the bovine preputial cavity. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2007;54:161–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2007.00247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smejkalova P. Extensive diversity of intestinal trichomonads of non-human primates. Parasitology. 2012;139:92–102. doi: 10.1017/S0031182011001624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reinmann K. Tritrichomonas foetus isolates from cats and cattle show minor genetic differences in unrelated loci ITS-2 and EF-1α. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;185:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Slapeta J. Tritrichomonas foetus from domestic cats and cattle are genetically distinct. Exp. Parasitol. 2010;126:209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gookin J.L. Molecular characterization of trichomonads from feces of dogs with diarrhea. J. Parasitol. 2005;91:939–943. doi: 10.1645/GE-474R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Duboucher C. Molecular identification of Tritrichomonas foetus-like organisms as coinfecting agents of human Pneumocystis pneumonia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:1165–1168. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1165-1168.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cepicka I. New evolutionary lineages, unexpected diversity, and host specificity in the parabasalid genus Tetratrichomonas. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006;39:542–551. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cepicka I. Cryptic species within the Tetratrichomonas gallinarum species complex revealed by molecular polymorphism. Vet. Parasitol. 2005;128:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mantini C. Molecular characterization of a new Tetratrichomonas species in a patient with empyema. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:2336–2339. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00353-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lopez-Escamilla E. New Tetratrichomonas species in two patients with pleural empyema. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013;51:3143–3146. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01056-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Grabensteiner E. Molecular analysis of clonal trichomonad isolates indicate the existence of heterogenic species present in different birds and within the same host. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;172:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kleina P. Molecular phylogeny of Trichomonadidae family inferred from ITS-1, 5.8S rRNA and ITS-2 sequences. Int. J. Parasitol. 2004;34:963–970. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gerhold R.W. Molecular characterization of the Trichomonas gallinae morphologic complex in the United States. J. Parasitol. 2008;94:1335–1341. doi: 10.1645/GE-1585.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Girard Y.A. Trichomonas stableri n. sp., an agent of trichomonosis in Pacific Coast band-tailed pigeons (Patagioenas fasciata monilis) Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2014;3:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wolfe N.D. Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature. 2007;447:279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature05775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lloyd-Smith J.O. Epidemic dynamics at the human–animal interface. Science. 2009;326:1362–1367. doi: 10.1126/science.1177345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ambroise-Thomas P. Emerging parasite zoonoses: the role of host–parasite relationship. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000;30:1361–1367. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jones K.E. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451:990–993. doi: 10.1038/nature06536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cascio A. The socio-ecology of zoonotic infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:336–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03451.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mizgerd J.P. Lung infection – a public health priority. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e76. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2006. The Control of Neglected Zoonotic Diseases: A Route to Poverty Alleviation. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Roser D. Dientamoeba fragilis in Denmark: epidemiological experience derived from four years of routine real-time PCR. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013;32:1303–1310. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roser D. Metronidazole therapy for treating Dientamoebiasis in children is not associated with better clinical outcomes: a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;58:1692–1699. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Casadevall A., Pirofski L.A. Virulence factors and their mechanisms of action: the view from a damage-response framework. J. Water Health. 2009;7(Suppl. 1):S2–S18. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Clemente J.C. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148:1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hirt R.P. Trichomonas vaginalis virulence factors: an integrative overview. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2013;89:439–443. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fastring D.R. Co-occurrence of Trichomonas vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis and vaginal shedding of HIV-1 RNA. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2014;41:173–179. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alsmark C. Patterns of prokaryotic lateral gene transfers affecting parasitic microbial eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R19. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Feschotte C., Pritham E.J. DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007;41:331–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Smith A.J. Novel core promoter elements and a cognate transcription factor in the divergent unicellular eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011;31:1444–1458. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00745-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kusdian G. The actin-based machinery of Trichomonas vaginalis mediates flagellate-amoeboid transition and migration across host tissue. Cell. Microbiol. 2013;15:1707–1721. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Carlton J.M. Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science. 2007;315:207–212. doi: 10.1126/science.1132894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Reed D.L. The evolution of infectious agents in relation to sex in animals and humans: brief discussions of some individual organisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1230:74–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Huang K.Y. Functional profiling of the Tritrichomonas foetus transcriptome and proteome. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2013;187:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zubacova Z. Comparative analysis of trichomonad genome sizes and karyotypes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2008;161:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Conrad M.D. Getting trichy: tools and approaches to interrogating Trichomonas vaginalis in a post-genome world. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Figueroa-Angulo E.E. The effects of environmental factors on the virulence of Trichomonas vaginalis. Microbes Infect. 2012;14:1411–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hirt R.P. Trichomonas vaginalis pathobiology new insights from the genome sequence. Adv. Parasitol. 2011;77:87–140. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391429-3.00006-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sommer U. Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis cysteine proteases that induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:23853–23860. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501752200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ma L. Involvement of the GP63 protease in infection of Trichomonas vaginalis. Parasitol. Res. 2011;109:71–79. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gould S.B. Deep sequencing of Trichomonas vaginalis during the early infection of vaginal epithelial cells and amoeboid transition. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013;43:707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Amin A. Cysteine peptidases, secreted by Trichomonas gallinae, are involved in the cytopathogenic effects on a permanent chicken liver cell culture. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wu Y. Data-mining approaches reveal hidden families of proteases in the genome of malaria parasite. Genome Res. 2003;13:601–616. doi: 10.1101/gr.913403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Palmer S.R., editor. Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses, Biology, Clinical Practice and Public Health Control. Oxford University Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ohkuma M. Symbioses of flagellates and prokaryotes in the gut of lower termites. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ecco R. Molecular confirmation of Trichomonas gallinae and other parabasalids from Brazil using the 5.8S and ITS-1 rRNA regions. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;190:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Stark D. Evaluation of the EasyScreen enteric parasite detection kit for the detection of Blastocystis spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba complex, and Giardia intestinalis from clinical stool samples. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014;78:149–152. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gerhold R.W. Persistence of two Trichomonas gallinae isolates in chlorinated and distilled water with or without organic material. Avian Dis. 2013;57:681–683. doi: 10.1637/10518-022213-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]