Skip to main content
BMC Ophthalmology logoLink to BMC Ophthalmology
. 2020 Mar 30;20:123. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01395-z

The association of dry eye syndrome and psychiatric disorders: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Chiao-Ying Liang 1,2,#, Wai-Man Cheang 3,#, Chun-Yuan Wang 1, Keng-Hung Lin 1, Li-Chen Wei 1, Yu-Yen Chen 1, Ying-Cheng Shen 1,
PMCID: PMC7106586  PMID: 32228638

Abstract

Background

Several previous studies reported a greater prevalence of dry eye syndrome (DES) among patients with psychiatric diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of DES in patients with psychiatric disorders (PD) using nationwide population-based data in Taiwan.

Methods

This population-based cohort study retrospectively identified patients with PD from 1997 to 2011. Patients with both PD and DES served as the DES cohort, and PD patients without DES comprised the non-DES cohort. PD was defined as a diagnosis of PD (ICD-9-CM 290–319) made by psychiatrists only, with at least three consecutive outpatient visits or at least one inpatient visit. DES was defined as a diagnosis of DES (ICD-9-CM 375.15) and a prescription for an eye lubricant (anatomical therapeutic chemical code, ATC code: S01XA). The main outcome measures were the prevalence of DES in these patients and associated risk factors.

Results

A total of 75,650 patients with PD (3665 in the DES cohort and 71,985 in the non-DES cohort) were included in the final analysis. The majority of patients in the DES group were women (72.6%), compared the non-DES group (57.8%). The mean age of patients in the DES cohort was 62.2 ± 14.9, which was significantly older than those in the non-DES group (50.9 ± 17.5). The patients with DES had a significantly greater likelihood of having dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, and neurotic disorders. Conditional regression analyses revealed that patients with dry eye disease were more likely to have schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disorder (OR = 1.9), depression (OR = 1.54), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.62). In addition, patients with DES were more likely to use 1st generation anti-psychotics (OR = 1.28) and had a lower risk of using 2nd generation anti-psychotics (OR = 0.64).

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that among PD patients, DES is highly prevalence in certain subtypes of PD, such as depression, bipolar disorder, and neurotic disorders, after adjusting for the comorbidities.

Keywords: Dry eye syndrome, Psychiatric disorders, Bipolar, Population-based

Background

Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a common ocular surface disease worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease of tears and ocular surface (DEWS 2007), causing irritation, blurred vision, burning, and foreign body sensation which affect patients’ work, daily activities, quality of life, and emotions [1, 2].

Several previous epidemiological studies reported a greater prevalence of DES among patients with psychiatric diseases, such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder [37]. However, information on the potential association between psychiatric disorders (PD) and DES is limited. Understanding of the interactions and chronology between PD, anti-psychotics, and DES is crucial for the integrated care of these patients. In the current study, we aim to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of DES in patients with psychiatric disorders using a nationwide population-based database from 1997 to 2011 in Taiwan.

Methods

Data source

The data were obtained from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) program was established on March 1, 1995, and currently provides health care coverage for 99% of the country’s population, approximately 23 million people. In this study, we used the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2010 (LHID2010), a subset of the NHIRD, comprising 1,000,000 randomly selected NHI beneficiaries. Patients’ demographic data including gender, date of birth, income level, and healthcare data including diagnostic codes, drug prescriptions, and medical procedures contained in the database and are made available to researchers. To protect patients’ privacy, all personally identifiable information is encrypted prior to release. The NHI records diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (CE13152B-6). In this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived because the patients’ original identification numbers were anonymized by encryption.

Study population

This population-based cohort study retrospectively identified patients with PD (ICD-9-CM 290–319) from 1997 to 2011 from the LHID2010. We defined PD diagnoses as those made by psychiatrists only, with at least three consecutive outpatient visits or at least one inpatient visit. Patients with both PD and DES (ICD-9-CM 375.15) served as the DES cohort, and PD patients without DES comprised the non-DES cohort. DES was defined as a diagnosis of DES and a prescription for an eye lubricant (anatomical therapeutic chemical code, ATC code: S01XA). Subjects who had a diagnosis of DES prior to the diagnosis of PD were excluded from this study. In addition, we excluded patients younger than 18 years and any PD diagnosis related to children or infants (ICD-9-CM 299, 312–316). Moreover, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) patients were also excluded.

Main measure outcomes

The main outcome measures were the prevalence of DES in PD patients and associated risk factors.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were conducted using the SAS 9.3 statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). We used Pearson’s Chi-square tests to compare the prevalence rates of different PD among patients with and without DES. In addition, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for gender, age, and each subtype of the PD were conducted to calculate the risk among patients with and without DES. A p-value < 0.05 in 2-tailed tests was defined as significant.

Results

Among the 1,000,000 subjects in the database, 90,318 patients were identified as being diagnosed with a PD (Fig. 1). We excluded 14,668 patients who had a diagnosis of DES prior to the diagnosis of PD (n = 2771), were younger than 18 years (n = 1195), had a PD diagnosis related to children or infants (n = 10,205), or had a diagnosis of RA (n = 260), SLE (n = 105), or SS (n = 132). The remaining 75,650 patients with PD (3665 in the DES cohort and 71,985 in the non-DES cohort) were included in the final analysis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the study sample selection from the National Health Insurance Research Database

The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups are compared in Table 1. The majority of patients in the DES group were women (72.6%). The mean age (±standard deviation) of the patients in the DES cohort was 62.2 ± 14.9, which was significantly older than that of the non-DES group (50.9 ± 17.5).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011

Dry Eye Syndrome (DES)
No
n = 71,985
Yes
n = 3665
Variables n (%) n (%) p-value
Gender < 0.001
 Women 41,594 (57.8) 2660 (72.6)
 Men 30,391 (42.2) 1005 (27.4)
Age, years < 0.001
 Mean ± SD 50.9 ± 17.5 62.2 ± 14.9 < 0.001
  < 30 8402 (11.7) 77 (2.1)
 30–39 13,367 (18.6) 227 (6.2)
 40–49 15,213 (21.1) 494 (13.5)
 50–59 14,499 (20.1) 760 (20.7)
 60–69 8837 (12.3) 891 (24.3)
 ≧70 11,667 (16.2) 1216 (33.2)

The prevalence rates of the different diagnoses of PD in patients with and without DES are shown in Table 2. The patients with DES had significantly greater prevalence rates of dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, and neurotic disorders. In contrast, prevalence rates of drug or alcoholic psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychiatric retardation were lower in DES patients. No significant differences in the prevalence rates of paranoid states and obsessive-compulsive disorders were found between patients in the DES and non-DES cohorts.

Table 2.

Psychiatric disorder conditions as defined by ICD-9-CM in PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011

Dry Eye Syndrome
No
n = 71,985
Yes
n = 3665
Psychiatric disorder condition (ICD-9-CM) n (%) n (%) p-value
Dementia (290, 331.0, 331.2) 7426 (10.3) 534 (14.6) < 0.001
Alcoholic psychoses (291) 1707 (2.4) 35 (1.0) < 0.001
Drug psychoses (292) 1339 (1.9) 38 (1.0) < 0.001
Schizophrenia (295) 4242 (5.9) 151 (4.1) < 0.001
Bipolar disorder (296) 2968 (4.1) 267 (7.3) < 0.001
Major depression (296.2, 296.3) 17,001 (23.6) 1180 (32.2) < 0.001
Paranoid states (297) 1822 (2.5) 90 (2.5) 0.777
Neurotic disorders (300) 59,528 (82.7) 3400 (92.8) < 0.001
Obsessive-compulsive disorders (300.3) 2059 (2.9) 109 (3.0) 0.687
Minor depression (300.4, 309.0, 309.1, 311) 38,542 (53.5) 2382 (65.0) < 0.001
Mild mental retardation (317) 1136 (1.6) 17 (0.5) < 0.001
Other specified mental retardation (318) 949 (1.3) 4 (0.1) < 0.001
Unspecified mental retardation (319) 1266 (1.8) 16 (0.4) < 0.001

Table 3 shows the crude and adjusted OR and 95% CI for each of the PD, comparing patients with and without DES.

Table 3.

A comparison of baseline characteristics of dry eye and non-dry eye patients based on PD conditions in univariate and multivariate models

Variables Univariate model Multivariate modelb
ORa (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Gender
 Women 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Men 0.52 (0.48–0.56) < 0.001 0.60 (0.56–0.65) < 0.001
Age, years
  < 40 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 40–49 1.85 (1.43–2.40) < 0.001 1.38 (1.06–1.80) < 0.001
 50–59 3.54 (2.78–4.51) 0.001 2.17 (1.70–2.78) 0.000
 60–69 5.72 (4.52–7.24) < 0.001 2.97 (2.33–3.79) 0.001
 70–79 11.00 (8.70–13.9) < 0.001 5.24 (4.10–6.72) < 0.001
 ≧80 11.37 (9.01–14.3) < 0.001 6.42 (4.98–8.27) < 0.001
Psychiatric disorder (Yes vs. No)
 Dementia 1.48 (1.35–1.63) < 0.001 0.73 (0.65–0.82) < 0.001
 Alcoholic psychoses 0.40 (0.28–0.56) < 0.001 0.59 (0.42–0.83) 0.003
 Drug psychoses 0.55 (0.40–0.76) < 0.001 0.85 (0.61–1.18) 0.332
 Schizophrenia 0.69 (0.58–0.81) < 0.001 1.34 (1.11–1.62) 0.002
 Bipolar disorder 1.83 (1.60–2.08) < 0.001 1.90 (1.65–2.19) < 0.001
 Major depression 1.54 (1.43–1.65) < 0.001
 Paranoid states 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 0.779 1.01 (0.81–1.27) 0.928
 Neurotic disorders 2.68 (2.36–3.05) < 0.001 1.62 (1.42–1.85) < 0.001
 Obsessive-compulsive disorders 1.04 (0.86–1.27) 0.682
 Minor depression 1.61 (1.50–1.73) < 0.001
 Mild mental retardation 0.29 (0.18–0.47) < 0.001 1.15 (0.69–1.93) 0.597
 Other specified mental retardation 0.08 (0.03–0.22) < 0.001 0.25 (0.09–0.70) 0.008
 Unspecified mental retardation 0.24 (0.15–0.40 < 0.001 0.84 (0.49–1.43) 0.519
Anti-psychotics
 None 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 First generation 2.06 (1.87–2.27) < 0.001 1.28 (1.15–1.41) < 0.001
 Second generation 0.65 (0.44–0.94) < 0.001 0.64 (0.44–0.95) 0.005
 Both 1.61 (1.42–1.81) < 0.001 1.07 (0.92–1.23) 0.118

aOR, odds ratio

badjusted for all variables in table

Conditional regression analyses conditioned on gender and age revealed that compared to patients without DES, patients with DES were more likely to have schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disorder (OR = 1.9), depression (OR = 1.54), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.62). In addition, patients with DES were more likely to use 1st generation anti-psychotics (OR = 1.28) and were less likely to use 2nd generation anti-psychotics (OR = 0.64).

Discussion

The aim of the current study was to use a nationwide population-based database to evaluate the prevalence of DES in patients with PD and to investigate the associated risk factors for the period 1997 to 2011. We found the prevalence of DES in adult patients with PD was 4.84% (n = 3665/75650).

Among the patients with PD in our study, female gender, older age, and a number of medical comorbidities were associated with higher risk of DES after adjustment, and the result is consistent with prior studies [8, 9]. Furthermore, patients with DES had significantly greater risks of schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disease (OR = 1.90), depression (OR = 1.54), sleeping disturbance/ insomnia (OR = 1.19), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.24), including anxiety (OR = 1.34), than those without DES. However, prevalence of DES was significantly lower in patients with dementia (OR = 0.73) and mental retardation (OR = 0.25).

Several previous studies demonstrated greater prevalence of DES in people with depression [35, 8, 9]. Furthermore, the severity of DES had a greater impact on the depressive symptoms compared with other psychosomatic symptoms [10]. Several mechanisms may explain the association between depression and DES [1113]. First, we believe that inflammation may play a key role in the pathogenesis of both depression and DES. In patients with DES, increased production of inflammatory cytokines was found in the tears and conjunctiva, including TNF-a, IFN-c, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8.47–51 [1416]. Depressive patients were also reported to have higher levels of inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides in the blood [1517]. These cytokines and neuropeptides may simultaneously lead to ocular surface inflammation and exacerbation of negative moods. Second, many previous studies reported depressive patients have a lower threshold of pain perception and often complaint worse dry eye symptom compare with patients without depression. “Neuropathic pain” caused by neural dysfunction plays a role in the unreasonable chronic pain in patients with DES and depression [18]. Third, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a class of antidepressant that have been reported to be significantly associated with DES. It is possible that SSRIs cause an anticholinergic side effect whereby altered serotonin levels affect the sensitivity thresholds of corneal nerves [19]. Further study on the correlation between SSRIs and DES is necessary.

Our study also found that anxiety disorder was correlated with DES, which supports the findings of two previously reported case-control studies [4, 20]. Furthermore, Wen et al. found three significant independent predictors of DES in patients with anxiety, including older age, duration of PD, and the use of an SSRI [4].

There was a significantly increased risk of DES in patients with bipolar disorder (OR = 1.55). Dibajnia et al. showed significant decreased tear break up time in patients with bipolar disorder treated with either lithium carbonate or sodium valproate [5]. However, the mechanism of this pharmacologic effect is not clear.

Older age has been shown to be associated with increased risk of both DES and dementia [1]. Previous studies demonstrated that patients with dementia have a greater risk of developing dry eye and Sjögren’s syndrome [21, 22]. However, we found a decreased risk of DES in dementia patients in our multivariate models. This is the first large-scale study to find this association. We believe the risk might have been underestimated because dementia patients may be less likely to report symptoms due to the decline in cognitive function and communication skills.

A major strength of this study was the use of a large cohort study to investigate the association between DES and PD using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). This database covers approximately 99% of the country’s residents. However, there were several limitations in this study. First, it was a retrospective study and detailed information are not available in the NHIRD, such as socioeconomic status, severity of disease, and laboratory results. Second, we used strict exclusion criteria and definitions for the diagnosis of DES. Only patients with both ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 375.15 and an anatomical therapeutic chemical code for ophthalmological lubricants (ATC code: S01XA) were included in the analysis. This selection bias might have resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of DES in psychiatric patients, because patients with only mild dry eye symptoms may not need to use any medication. In addition, some patients may seek other medications that are not available on the NHI system.

Conclusion

This nationwide population-based cohort study demonstrated that among PD patients, DES is highly prevalence in certain subtypes of PD, such as depression, bipolar disorder, and neurotic disorders, after adjusting for the comorbidities.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Division of Basic Medical Science, Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital for assistance with statistical analysis.

Abbreviations

ATC

Anatomical therapeutic chemical code

CI

Confidence Interval

DEWS

Dry Eye Work Shop

DES

Dry Eye Syndrome

ICD-9-CM

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification

IL

Interleukins

LHID

Longitudinal Health Insurance Database

NHI

National Health Insurance

NHIRD

National Health Insurance Research Database

OR

Odds Ratio

PD

Psychiatric Disorders

RA

Rheumatoid Arthritis

SLE

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

SS

Sjogren’s Syndrome

SSRIs

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

TNF

Tumor Necrosis Factor

Authors’ contributions

CL and WC analyzed and interpreted the data obtained from Taiwan’s NHIRD and were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. They contributed equally to this work. CW and KL organized the research team, made a substantial contribution to the ethic approval and the work draft. LW and YC made a substantial contribution to the acquisition and revision of the data and table format. YS as the corresponding author design of the work, made substantial contributions to the conception and ensured that that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. In this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived because the patients’ original identification numbers were anonymized by encryption.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Chiao-Ying Liang and Wai-Man Cheang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Chiao-Ying Liang, Email: joycebibo@gmail.com.

Wai-Man Cheang, Email: adycheang@gmail.com.

Chun-Yuan Wang, Email: cywang0926@yahoo.com.tw.

Keng-Hung Lin, Email: linkh@vghtc.gov.tw.

Li-Chen Wei, Email: lichen5883@yahoo.com.tw.

Yu-Yen Chen, Email: boston556587@gmail.com.

Ying-Cheng Shen, Email: cyl0415@yahoo.com.tw.

References

  • 1.Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:405–412. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S5555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thulasi P, Djalilian AR. Update in current diagnostics and therapeutics of dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11S):S27–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fernandez CA, Galor A, Arheart KL, Musselman DL, Venincasa VD, Florez HJ, Lee DJ. Dry eye syndrome, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression in an older male veteran population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3666–3672. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wen W, Wu Y, Chen Y, Gong L, Li M, Chen X, Yan M, Xiao Z, Sun X. Dry eye disease in patients with depressive and anxiety in Shanghai. Cornea. 2012;31(6):686–692. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182261590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dibajnia P, Mohammadinia M, Moghadasin M, Amiri MA. Tear film break-up time in bipolar disorder. Iran J Psychiatry. 2012;7(4):191–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Labbé A, et al. Dry eye disease, dry eye symptoms and depression: the Beijing eye study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(11):1399–1403. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Szakáts I, et al. The role of health anxiety and depressive symptoms in dry eye disease. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(8):1044–1049. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1088955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Galor A, Feuer W, Lee DJ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye syndrome in a United States veterans affairs population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang TJ, Wang IJ, Hu CC, Lin HC. Comorbidities of dry eye disease: a nationwide population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(7):663–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asiedu K, Dzasimatu SK, Kyei S. Impact of dry eye on psychosomatic symptoms and quality of life in a healthy youthful clinical sample. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 2):S404–S409. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu KC, Huynh K, Grubbs J, Jr, et al. Autoimmunity in the pathogenesis and treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14:403. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0403-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stevenson W, Chauhan SK, Dana R. Dry eye disease: an immunemediated ocular surface disorder. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:90–100. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barabino S, Chen Y, Chauhan S, et al. Ocular surface immunity: homeostatic mechanisms and their disruption in dry eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL. Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(9):732–741. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Felger JC, Lotrich FE. Inflammatory cytokines in depression: neurobiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neuroscience. 2013;246:199–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vriezekolk JE, Geenen R, Hartkamp A, Godaert GL, Bootsma H, Kruize AA, Bijlsma JW, Derksen RH. Psychological and somatic predictors of perceived and measured ocular dryness of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(12):2351–2355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Werner FM, et al. Classical neurotransmitters and neuropeptides involved in major depression: a review. Int J Neurosci. 2010;120(7):455–470. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2010.483651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Galor A. Painful Dry Eye Symptoms: A Nerve Problem or a Tear Problem? Ophthalmology. 2019;126(5):648–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lovett-Barr MR, Mitchell GS, Satriotomo I, Johnson SM. Serotonin-induced in vitro long-term facilitation exhibits differential pattern sensitivity in cervical and thoracic inspiratory motor output. Neuroscience. 2006;142(3):885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li M, Gong L, Sun X, Chapin WJ. Anxiety and depression in patients with dry eye syndrome. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(1):1–7. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.519850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoshikawa K, Hatate J, Toratani N, Sugiura S, Shimizu Y, Takahash T, Ito T, Fukunaga R. Prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome with dementia in a memory clinic. J Neurol Sci. 2012;322(1–2):217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liliang PC, Liang CL, Lu K, Yang SN, Hsieh MT, Tai YC, Wang KW. Population-based study suggests an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease in Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37(4):935–941. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3940-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES