Abstract
Hedgehog (Hh) autoprocessing converts Hh precursor protein to cholesterylated Hh ligand for downstream signaling. A conserved active-site aspartate residue, D46, plays a key catalytic role in Hh autoprocessing by serving as a general base to activate substrate cholesterol. Here we report that a charge-altering Asp-to-His mutant (D46H) expands native cholesterylation activity and retains active-site conformation. Native activity toward cholesterol was established for D46H in vitro using a continuous FRET-based autoprocessing assay and in cellulo with stable expression in human 293T cells. The catalytic efficiency of cholesterylation with D46H is similar to that with wild type (WT), with kmax/KM = 2.1 × 103 and 3.7 × 103 M−1 s−1, respectively, and an identical pKa = 5.8 is obtained for both residues by NMR. To our knowledge this is the first example where a general base substitution of an Asp for His preserves both the structure and activity as a general base. Surprisingly, D46H exhibits increased catalytic efficiency toward non-native substrates, especially coprostanol (>200-fold) and epicoprostanol (>300-fold). Expanded substrate tolerance is likely due to stabilization by H46 of the negatively charged tetrahedral intermediate using electrostatic interactions, which are less constrained by geometry than H-bond stabilization by D46. In addition to providing fundamental insights into Hh autoprocessing, our findings have important implications for protein engineering and enzyme design.
Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is an important pathway for embryonic development, stem cell maintenance, and tissue repair in metazoans.1–4 Abnormal activation of the Hh signaling pathway has been associated with many common types of cancers, including lung, breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer.5–8 Hh autoprocessing (Figure 1A) is a required step preceding Hh signaling, in which the Hh precursor protein self-cleaves to release a cholesterylated Hh ligand.1,9 The cleavage of the two-domain Hh precursor (HhN + HhC) is catalyzed by both the Hint (Hedgehog/intein) subdomain within HhC using intein-like chemistry and the sterol recognition region (SRR) which binds cholesterol.10 There are two steps in Hh autoprocessing: N–S acyl shift and then transesterification (Figure 1A). In the N–S acyl shift, the thiol group of a conserved cysteine 1 (C1) of HhC carries out a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl of the preceding glycine, the last residue of HhN, and forms a thioester intermediate. The hydroxyl group of a cholesterol molecule then attacks the thioester, displacing HhC and cholesterylating HhN at its C-terminal glycine residue. Cholesterylation is a crucial step for Hh ligand generation. Abolishing cholesterylation prevents Hh ligand secretion, which allows the premature degradation of Hh ligand in the endoplasmic reticulum and suppression of downstream signaling events.11,12 The lipidation of Hh ligand also restricts extracellular diffusion to facilitate the formation of signaling gradients during embryogenesis.13
Figure 1.

Hedgehog (Hh) autoprocessing and multiple sequence alignment of HhC domain. (A) Two catalytic steps in the autoprocessing of Hh precursor. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of HhC domain (only N-terminal region of HhC is shown) from different organisms using Clustal Omega.14 All the identical, conserved, and semiconserved residues are indicated using an asterisk (*), colon (:), or period (.), respectively. Sequences listed from top to bottom, except C. elegans, are from the following entries in UniProt (www.uniprot.org): Q02936, Q15465, G1TCI1, G3UC88, G5AKL0, Q98938, Q9U5Z6, A7RW45, H2LTU8, Q91610, and O61676. The sequence for C. elegans is from Wormbase (www.wormbase.org): W06B11.4b. C1, D/H 46, and ‘TXXH’ motifs are at the active site of the hint domain and are highlighted. Percent identity is based on HhC sequence alignment. (C) Conserved residues at the active site of the WT Hh Hint domain, including C1, D46, T69, H72, and C143.
Previously, we demonstrated that D46 coordinates two catalytic steps of Hh autoprocessing.15 Mutagenesis and crystal structure of Drosophila melanogaster (Dme) Hh Hint domain have shown several conserved residues at the active site (Figure 1C), including C1, D46, T69, H72, and C143.16 Mutagenesis of D46 to alanine (A), asparagine (N), arginine (R) and glutamate (E) abolishes Hh activity toward cholesterol.15 We were intrigued by multiple sequence alignment of Hh Hint domain (Figure 1B), which showed a charge-altering D-to-H substitution (D46H) in the sequences of Hh and Hh-related proteins in many organisms including C. elegans.17,18 In solution chemistry, carboxylic acid and imidazole buffers can function almost interchangeably as acid/base catalysts; however, in enzymatic systems, changing a key catalytic functional group from carboxylic acid (D) to imidazole (H) usually leads to impaired or a total loss of function.19,20 To investigate whether these natural “histidine mutants” in Hh and Hh-related proteins could carry out autoprocessing and cholesterylation, we characterized enzyme activity of D46H toward native cholesterol and a library of 17 non-native sterol and sterol-like molecules, and also made structural comparisons through NMR and X-ray crystallography.
To test if D46H preserves enzyme activity, we utilized our FRET-based in vitro assay21 (Figure 2A). The FRET reporter, C-HhC-Y, is a single polypeptide composed of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fused to the N- and C-termini of the Drosophila HhC domain, respectively. Before cleavage, C-HhC-Y exhibits FRET due to the spatial proximity of CFP and YFP, which is subsequently lost when CFP is cleaved off by cholesterol during autoprocessing. In the absence of cholesterol (Figure 2B), D46H exhibited stable FRET signal over the assay interval. In the presence of cholesterol, FRET signal of the D46H decreased with a rate similar to that of the WT, indicating a comparable autoprocessing activity as WT (Figure 2B, compare red and black traces). This is in contrast to D46A, D46N, D46E, and D46R mutations, which abolished cholesterylation.15 The cholesterylation activity of D46H and WT was further validated using a fluorescently tagged cholesterol derivative as substrate (Figure 2C). Precursor protein was first reacted with a molecule of cholesterol derivative where the side chain contains an azide (Figure S1A). Product mixtures were then subjected to strain promoted click chemistry with alkyne modified rhodamine (Figure S1B), followed by gel electrophoresis and fluorescence in-gel imaging. After the autoprocessing reaction, the product polypeptide, HhN, exhibits fluorescence under UV, confirming covalent sterylation brought about by both WT and D46H (Figure 2C, right panel). In addition, we also confirmed that D46H mutant can mediate Hh autoprocessing in human 293T cells (Figure S2), although less efficiently than the WT. The lower efficiency of D46H in cell culture may be due to altered interaction with protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), which is required for Hh autoprocessing in endoplasmic reticulum.22
Figure 2.

Activity and structural characterization of D46H. (A) Schematics of FRET-based assays. C-HhC-Y represents CFP-HhC-YFP, in which C-chol = CFP-cholesterol and HhC-Y = HhC-YFP. (B) D46H has a similar autoprocessing rate as the WT in the presence of cholesterol. (C) Validation of HhC cholesterylation using a fluorescently tagged cholesterol derivative. (D) The WT Hh Hint domain (in blue, PDB: 1AT0) and D46H (in green, PDB: 6TYY) have almost identical 3D structure (RMSD = 0.4 Å). Conserved residues in the active site of WT and D46H were magnified on the right. (E) pKa measurement of H46 by NMR pH titration, showing identical pKa between D46 and H46.
The WT and D46H Hint domains have almost identical 3D structures, with an RMSD of 0.4 Å between two crystal structures (Figure 2D). Conformation of the active site is also preserved (Figure 2D). The X-ray data agrees with the minimal chemical shift perturbation (CSP) caused by D46H in solution NMR (Figure S3A,B). A key finding for D46 is an elevated pKa of 5.8, which enables the proton shuttling through its side chain during WT Hh autoprocessing.15 To understand how D46H mediates Hh autoprocessing, the pKa of H46 was measured by pH titration using long-range 1H–15N HMQC NMR spectra (Figure S4). The titration curve for H46 was fit to a modified Henderson–Hasselbalch equation,23 giving a pKa value of 5.8 (Figure 2E), identical to the pKa of D46. This remarkable correlation suggests similar catalytic roles of H46 in Hh autoprocessing as D46.
Recruitment of cholesterol by SRR subdomain of HhC is a crucial step in Hh autoprocessing. However, the specific interactions involved in sterol recognition remain largely unresolved. Studies show that HhC can also recognize diverse substrates in addition to cholesterol.24,25 While HhC has a relatively broad tolerance toward sterols with alterations distant from the site of bond scission, its autoprocessing efficiency is sensitive to changes in sterol A-ring.26 To investigate if D46H changes in substrate selectivity, the autoprocessing activities toward a library of 18 different sterols and sterol analogs (Figure S5) were characterized by Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetic analysis. (Figures S6 and S7). Surprisingly, D46H exhibits increased promiscuity toward non-native substrates (Tables 1 and S1), especially for coprostanol and epicoprostanol (Table 1).
Table 1.
Expanded Substrate Tolerance of D46H for Structurally Diverse Substrates
| substrate | efficiency (kmax/KM) (×103 M−1 s−1) | D46H/WT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | D46H | ||
| cholesterol | 2.1 ± 6% | 3.7 ± 12% | 1.8 ± 13% |
| epicoprostanol | <0.0002 | 0.063 ± 16% | >315 |
| coprostanol | 0.011 ± 8% | 2.4 ± 7% | 218 ± 11% |
| abiraterone | 0.38 ± 20% | 2.0 ± 3% | 5.3 ± 20% |
| A-nor-cholestanol | 0.29 ± 18% | 1.3 ± 15% | 4.5 ± 23% |
| allocholesterol | 2.3 ± 9% | 7.6 ± 11% | 3.3 ± 14% |
| desmosterol | 1.9 ± 9% | 5.7 ± 13% | 3.0 ± 16% |
| galeterone | 8.0 ± 16% | 19 ± 11% | 2.4 ± 19% |
| 5-androsten-3β-ol | 0.94 ± 8% | 1.6 ± 7% | 1.7 ± 11% |
| ergosterol | 1.6 ± 15% | 2.3 ± 11% | 1.4 ± 19% |
For cholesterol, D46H and WT have similar kinetic parameters, where D46H has a KM of 1.0 μM and kmax of3.6 × 10−3 s−1, while WT has a KM of 1.9 μM and kmax of 3.8 × 10−3 s−1 (Figure 3A). Coprostanol, a microbial metabolite of cholesterol27 with a bent A-ring, shows much higher autoprocessing activity by D46H than WT. D46H has a KM of 2.4 μM and kmax of 2.9 × 10−3 s−1, while WT has a KM of 25 μM and kmax of 0.3 × 10−3 s−1 for coprostanol (Figure 3B). The efficiency of D46H over WT is >200-fold greater (Table 1). For epicoprostanol, D46H has a KM of 16 μM and kmax of 1.0 × 10−3 s−1, while WT shows no detectable reactivity (Figure 3C). The efficiency of D46H over WT is >300-fold greater for epicoprostanol (Table 1). These data demonstrate that while WT Hh is less tolerant toward cholesterol analogs as substrates, D46H exhibits comparable or enhanced activity toward non-native substrates, indicating an expanded substrate scope of the D46H.
Figure 3.

Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetics of D46H and WT toward cholesterol (A), coprostanol (B), and epicoprostanol(C). (D) 3D structures of cholesterol (cyan), coprostanol (orange), and epicoprostanol (yellow) are aligned using PyMOL.
As a general base, D46 and H46 are expected to have equivalent efficiency due to their identical pKa as stated above. However, the D46H may be more substrate promiscuous because H46 is able to promote formation of the negatively charged tetrahedral addition intermediate through favorable electrostatic interaction with its side chain imidazolium (Figure S8). Electrostatic stabilization interactions are longer range and less geometrically constrained than H-bonding (Figure 4), which is the only mode of transition state stabilization possible for D46. It is conceivable that a geometric analog of cholesterol, like coprostanol, could displace D46 out of its catalytically competent position, preventing H-bonding and thereby suppressing catalysis. With H46, electrostatic stabilization would be less sensitive to geometric alteration of the substrate, allowing reaction with more structurally diverse sterols.
Figure 4.

H46 side chain can provide favorable electrostatic stabilization not available in D46.
Changing a key enzymatic residue from aspartate to histidine is expected to compromise function.19,20 There are few examples of active-site D-to-H mutation that preserve enzyme activity. The closest example is Δ5-3-ketosteroid isomerase (KSI), where the WT active-site residue D38 shuttles the sterol proton while the D38H mutation lowers the catalytic efficiency by ~20-fold.28 It was suggested that in KSI a neutral H38 may be more favorable for binding the hydrophobic sterol than D38.28 Here we have a surprising case where in vitro kinetics, pKa values, 3D structure, and active-site conformation are nearly identical between the WT and D46H, indicating that D-to-H mutation, even at a critical active-site position, can be a synonymous substitution. The one change we observed is that the D46H exhibits increased activity toward non-native substrates. These observations have important implications in enzyme engineering for expanding or altering substrate specificity.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was generously supported by NIH grants R01 CA206592 to C.W. and B.P.C., and R01 AI140726 and R21 AI141178 to H.L.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08914.
Figures S1–S8, Tables S1 and S2, and experimental procedures; PDB deposition (6TYY) validation of D46H crystal structure (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- (1).Petrov K; Wierbowski BM; Salic A Sending and Receiving Hedgehog Signals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2017, 33 (1), 145–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Machold R; Hayashi S; Rutlin M; Muzumdar MD; Nery S; Corbin JG; Gritli-Linde A; Dellovade T; Porter JA; Rubin LL; Dudek H; McMahon AP; Fishell G Sonic Hedgehog Is Required for Progenitor Cell Maintenance in Telencephalic Stem Cell Niches. Neuron 2003, 39 (6), 937–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Ingham PW; McMahon AP Hedgehog Signaling in Animal Development: Paradigms and Principles. Genes Dev. 2001, 15 (23), 3059–3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Zhao C; Chen A; Jamieson CH; Fereshteh M; Abrahamsson A; Blum J; Kwon HY; Kim J; Chute JP; Rizzieri D; Munchhof M; VanArsdale T; Beachy PA; Reya T Hedgehog Signalling Is Essential for Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells in Myeloid Leukaemia. Nature 2009, 458 (7239), 776–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Taipale J; Beachy PA The Hedgehog and Wnt Signalling Pathways in Cancer. Nature 2001, 411, 349–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Thayer SP; Di Magliano MP; Heiser PW; Nielsen CM; Roberts DJ; Lauwers GY; Qi YP; Gysin S; Fernández-del Castillo C; Yajnik V; Antoniu B; McMahon M; Warshaw AL; Hebrok M Hedgehog Is an Early and Late Mediator of Pancreatic Cancer Tumorigenesis. Nature 2003, 425 (6960), 851–856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Watkins DN; Berman DM; Burkholder SG; Wang B; Beachy PA; Baylin SB Hedgehog Signalling within Airway Epithelial Progenitors and in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Nature 2003, 422 (6929), 313–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).McMahon AP; Ingham PW; Tabin CJ 1 Developmental Roles and Clinical Significance of Hedgehog Signaling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol 2003, 53, 1–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Porter JA; Young KE; Beachy PA Cholesterol Modification of Hedgehog Signaling Proteins in Animal Development. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1996, 274 (5285), 255–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Tanaka Hall TM; Porter JA; Young KE; Koonin EV; Beachy PA; Leahy DJ Crystal Structure of a Hedgehog Autoprocessing Domain: Homology between Hedgehog and Self-Splicing Proteins. Cell 1997, 91 (1), 85–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Tukachinsky H; Kuzmickas RP; Jao CY; Liu J; Salic A Dispatched and Scube Mediate the Efficient Secretion of the Cholesterol-Modified Hedgehog Ligand. Cell Rep. 2012, 2 (2), 308–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Porter J. a; Young KE; Beachy P. a. Cholesterol Modification of Hedgehog Signaling Proteins in Animal Development. Science 1996, 274 (5285), 255–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Porter JA; von Kessler DP; Ekker SC; Young KE; Lee JJ; Moses K; Beachy PA The Product of Hedgehog Autoproteolytic Cleavage Active in Local and Long-Range Signalling. Nature 1995, 374 (6520), 363–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Larkin MA; Blackshields G; Brown NP; Chenna R; Mcgettigan PA; McWilliam H; Valentin F; Wallace IM; Wilm A; Lopez R; Thompson JD; Gibson TJ; Higgins DG Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23 (21), 2947–2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Xie J; Owen T; Xia K; Callahan B; Wang C A Single Aspartate Coordinates Two Catalytic Steps in Hedgehog Autoprocessing. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (34), 10806–10809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Hall TM; Porter J. a; Young KE; Koonin EV; Beachy P. a; Leahy DJ Crystal Structure of a Hedgehog Autoprocessing Domain: Homology between Hedgehog and Self-Splicing Proteins. Cell 1997, 91 (1), 85–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Bürglin TR Warthog and Groundhog, Novel Families Related to Hedgehog. Curr. Biol 1996, 6 (9), 1047–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Bürglin TR Evolution of Hedgehog and Hedgehog-Related Genes, Their Origin from Hog Proteins in Ancestral Eukaryotes and Discovery of a Novel Hint Motif. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Mei B; Zalkin H A Cysteine-Histidine-Aspartate Catalytic Triad Is Involved in Glutamine Amide Transfer Function in PurF-Type Glutamine Amidotransferases. J. Biol. Chem 1989, 264 (28), 16613–16619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Cheung PK; Mccormick C; Crawford BE; Esko JD; Tufaro F; Duncan G Etiological Point Mutations in the Hereditary Multiple Exostoses Gene EXT1: A Functional Analysis of Heparan Sulfate Polymerase Activity. Am. J. Hum. Genet 2001, 69, 55–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Owen TS; Ngoje G; Lageman TJ; Bordeau BM; Belfort M; Callahan BP Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Cholesterolysis Assay Identifies a Novel Hedgehog Inhibitor. Anal. Biochem 2015, 488, 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Chen X; Tukachinsky H; Huang C; Jao C; Chu Y; Tang H; Mueller B; Schulman S; Rapoport TA; Salic A Processing and Turnover of the Hedgehog Protein in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Cell Biol 2011, 192 (5), 825–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Du Z; Shemella PT; Liu Y; McCallum SA; Pereira B; Nayak SK; Belfort G; Belfort M; Wang C Highly Conserved Histidine Plays a Dual Catalytic Role in Protein Splicing: A PKa Shift Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131 (32), 11581–11589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Cooper MK; Wassif CA; Krakowiak PA; Taipale J; Gong R; Kelley I; Porter FD; Beachy PA A Defective Response to Hedgehog Signaling in Disorders of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. Nat. Genet 2003, 33 (4), 508–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Bordeau BM; Ciulla DA; Callahan BP Hedgehog Proteins Consume Steroidal CYP17A1 Antagonists: Potential Therapeutic Significance in Advanced Prostate Cancer. ChemMed-Chem 2016, 11 (18), 1983–1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Ciulla DA; Wagner AG; Liu X; Cooper CL; Jorgensen MT; Wang C; Goyal P; Banavali NK; Pezzullo JL; Giner JL; Callahan BP Sterol A-Ring Plasticity in Hedgehog Protein Cholesterolysis Supports a Primitive Substrate Selectivity Mechanism. Chem. Commun 2019, 55 (12), 1829–1832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).García JL; Uhía I; Galań B Catabolism and Biotechnological Applications of Cholesterol Degrading Bacteria. Microb. Biotechnol 2012, 5, 679–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Holman CM; Benisek WF Insights into the Catalytic Mechanism and Active-Site Environment of Comamonas Testosteroni.DELTA.5–3-Ketosteroid Isomerase as Revealed by Site-Directed Mutagenesis of the Catalytic Base Aspartate-38. Biochemistry 1995, 34(43), 14245–14253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
