Abstract
Background
The importation of SARS was responsible for the outbreaks in Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam and Canada at a time when this new disease had not been identified. We report the incidence and impact of cases of SARS imported to Singapore between 25 February and 31 May 2003, and describe national measures to prevent further importation.
Methods
Information on imported cases of SARS and measures taken at entry points to Singapore was retrieved from the Ministry of Health and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore.
Results
Of the 6 imported cases, which all occurred before screening measures were implemented at the airport, only the first resulted in extensive secondary transmission. Of 442,973 air passengers screened after measures were implemented, 136 were sent to a designated hospital for further SARS screening; none was diagnosed as having SARS.
Conclusions
The SARS outbreak in Singapore can be traced to the first imported case. The absence of transmission from the other imported cases was probably a result of relatively prompt identification and isolation of cases, together with a low potential for transmission. New imported SARS cases therefore need not lead to major outbreaks if systems are in place to identify and isolate them early. Screening at entry points is costly, has a low yield and is not sufficient in itself, but may be justified in light of the major economic, social and international impact which even a single imported SARS case may have.
Footnotes
The authors had no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose.
Reference
- 1. Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome - worldwide, 2003. MMWR 2003; 52 (11): 226–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A. et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (20): 1986–1994. 12682352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B. et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (20): 1995–2005. 12671061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hsu LYLC, Green JA, Ang B. et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Singapore: clinical features of index patient and initial contacts. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9 (06): 713–717. 12781012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wilder-Smith A, Paton NI. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: imported cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome to Singapore had impact on national epidemic. BMJ 2003; 326: 1393–1394. AMBIGUOUS 12816834,12816833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chan-Yeung M, Yu WC. Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: case report. BMJ 2003; 326: 850–852. 12702616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Severe acute respiratory syndrome - Singapore, 2003. MMWR 2003; 52 (18): 405–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lipsitch M, Cohen T, Cooper B. et al. Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003; 300: 1961–1966. 12766206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Riley S, Fraser C, Donnelly CA. et al. Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science 2003; 300: 1966–1970. 12766207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]