Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2020 Mar 31;94(8):e01930-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01930-19

A Single Amino Acid at Position 431 of the PB2 Protein Determines the Virulence of H1N1 Swine Influenza Viruses in Mice

Chengzhi Xu a,#, Bangfeng Xu a,#, Yunpu Wu a,b, Shiman Yang a, Yunhui Jia a, Wenhua Liang a, Dawei Yang a, Likun He b, Wenfei Zhu c, Yan Chen a, Huanliang Yang a, Benliang Yu b, Dayan Wang c, Chuanling Qiao a,
Editor: Adolfo Garc@030fa-Sastred
PMCID: PMC7108842  PMID: 31996432

The frequent reassortment among different influenza viruses in pigs adds complexity to the epidemiology of swine influenza. The diverse viral virulence phenotypes underline the need to investigate the possible genetic determinants for evaluating the pandemic potential to human public health. Here, we found that multiple genotypes of influenza viruses cocirculate in the swine population in Liaoning Province, China. Furthermore, we pinpointed a single amino acid at position 431 in the PB2 protein which plays a critical role in the virulence of H1N1 viruses in mice and found that the alteration of viral polymerase activities is the cause of the different virulence. Our study further indicated that the virulence of influenza virus is a polygenic trait, and the newly identified virulence-related residue in the PB2 provides important information for broadening knowledge on the genetic basis of viral virulence of influenza viruses.

KEYWORDS: genetic basis, influenza virus, virulence

ABSTRACT

Genetic reassortments occurred continuously among multiple subtypes or genotypes of influenza viruses prevalent in pigs. Of note, some reassortant viruses bearing the internal genes of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (2009/H1N1) virus sporadically caused human infection, which highlights their potential threats to human public health. In this study, we performed phylogenetic analysis on swine influenza viruses (SIVs) circulating in Liaoning Province, China. A total of 22 viruses, including 18 H1N1 and 4 H1N2 viruses, were isolated from 5,750 nasal swabs collected from pigs in slaughterhouses from 2014 to 2016. H1N1 viruses formed four genotypes, which included Eurasian avian-like H1N1 (EA H1N1) and double/triple reassortant H1N1 derived from EA H1N1, 2009/H1N1, and triple reassortant H1N2 (TR H1N2) viruses. H1N1 SIVs with different genotypes and even those within the same genotypes represented different pathogenicities in mice. We further characterized two naturally isolated H1N1 SIVs that had similar viral genomes but differed substantially in their virulence in mice and found that a single amino acid at position 431 in the basic polymerase 2 (PB2) protein significantly affected the viral replication capacity and virulence of these two viruses. Taken together, our findings revealed the diverse genomic origins and virulence of the SIVs prevalent in Liaoning Province during 2014 to 2016, which highlights that continuous surveillance is essential to monitor the evolution of SIVs. We identified a naturally occurring amino acid mutation in the PB2 protein of H1N1 SIVs that impacts the viral replication and virulence in mice by altering the viral polymerase activity.

IMPORTANCE The frequent reassortment among different influenza viruses in pigs adds complexity to the epidemiology of swine influenza. The diverse viral virulence phenotypes underline the need to investigate the possible genetic determinants for evaluating the pandemic potential to human public health. Here, we found that multiple genotypes of influenza viruses cocirculate in the swine population in Liaoning Province, China. Furthermore, we pinpointed a single amino acid at position 431 in the PB2 protein which plays a critical role in the virulence of H1N1 viruses in mice and found that the alteration of viral polymerase activities is the cause of the different virulence. Our study further indicated that the virulence of influenza virus is a polygenic trait, and the newly identified virulence-related residue in the PB2 provides important information for broadening knowledge on the genetic basis of viral virulence of influenza viruses.

INTRODUCTION

Swine influenza virus (SIV), first known as classical swine H1N1 (CS H1N1) virus, was introduced into pigs in 1918 in North America (1, 2). Eurasian avian-like H1N1 (EA H1N1) SIV was transmitted from poultry to pigs in 1979 in Europe (3). Triple reassortant H1N2 (TR H1N2) was isolated from pigs in 1999 in North America, which was derived from CS H1N1 and triple reassortant H3N2 viruses that have emerged among American pigs since 1998 (4). In 2009, further reassortment between EA H1N1 and TR H1N2 viruses occurred in pigs, which generated the novel variant virus (2009 pandemic H1N1 [2009/H1N1]) causing a human influenza pandemic worldwide (5, 6). After emergence of 2009/H1N1 virus in 2009, it quickly reintroduced into pigs (7). Rapidly, numerous outbreaks in swine were reported worldwide, including Europe and Asia (811). Pigs are considered a mixing vessel for the generation of such viruses, with genetic material originating from pigs, humans, and/or birds (12). Since 2009, genetic reassortment among the pandemic 2009/H1N1 virus, EA H1N1, and other swine H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses was detected repeatedly in pigs (1320). Notably, sporadic human infections of endemic and novel reassortant SIVs (2127) and the seropositivity of at-risk populations, such as swine workers (2830), underscore the importance of influenza surveillance in pigs.

In China, an intensively active surveillance program for SIVs has been conducted since 2009. EA H1N1 viruses are the predominant subtype of influenza viruses in swine (31). A variety of reassortant viruses were also detected in pigs in southern China, which has been considered an epicenter of influenza viruses (14, 32). Few data are available about the prevalence of SIVs in Liaoning Province, which is in the northeast of China, despite it being the main swine-producing region in China (11, 33). Therefore, in this study, we conducted continuous surveillance for influenza viruses in pigs from 2014 to 2016 and analyzed the genetic and pathogenic characteristics of these isolates. Furthermore, we investigated the molecular determinants of two genetically similar viruses showing different virulence in mice and explored the possible underlying mechanism.

RESULTS

Multiple genotypes of H1N1 SIVs cocirculated in pigs.

From November 2014 to December 2016, a total of 5,750 nasal swabs were collected from pigs in slaughterhouses located in Liaoning Province, China. In total, 22 viruses, including 18 H1N1 and 4 H1N2, were isolated and identified. The eight gene segments of the isolates were sequenced.

To characterize the gene segments of these viruses, we constructed unrooted phylogenetic trees using the gene sequences of 247 H1N1 reference strains previously isolated in mainland China, which were downloaded from the global initiative on sharing all influenza data (GISAID) (https://platform.gisaid.org/) until July 2019. Phylogenetic analysis of the hemagglutinin (HA) genes showed that all the analyzed viruses were classified into four lineages, including EA H1N1, human H1N1 (Hu H1N1), CS H1N1, and 2009/H1N1. The 22 viruses isolated in this study shared 95.2% to 100.0% sequence identity at the nucleotide level and fell into the EA H1N1 lineage (Fig. 1). Analysis of the N1 neuraminidase (NA) genes showed that all the H1N1 viruses isolated in this study belonged to the EA H1N1 lineage, with the nucleotide sequence identity of 95.2% to 100.0% (Fig. 2A). The N2 NA genes of the four H1N2 isolates shared the nucleotide sequence identity of 99.8% to 99.9% and were most closely related to a H1N2 virus (A/swine/Guangxi/325/2012) previously isolated in China, which clustered into the North American TR H1N2 lineage (15). Twenty-two viruses were clustered into two distinct lineages based on their basic polymerase 2 (PB2) genes, in which the 2009/H1N1 lineage included 11 H1N1 and 4 H1N2 viruses and the EA H1N1 lineage included 7 H1N1 viruses (Fig. 2B). The genetic trees constructed for the basic polymerase 1 (PB1) and acidic polymerase (PA) genes were similar to that for the PB2 gene, which showed that 11 H1N1 and 4 H1N2 viruses clustered into the 2009/H1N1 lineage and 7 H1N1 viruses clustered into the EA H1N1 lineage (Fig. 2C and D). In the phylogenetic tree for the nucleoprotein (NP) gene, 9 H1N1 and 4 H1N2 viruses clustered into the 2009/H1N1 lineage, and another 9 H1N1 viruses belonged to the EA H1N1 lineage (Fig. 2E). In the matrix (M) gene tree, 18 H1N1 viruses all belonged to the EA lineage, with a nucleotide identity ranging from 94.2% to 100%. Furthermore, 4 H1N2 viruses were clustered into the 2009/H1N1 sublineage (Fig. 2F). Phylogenetic analysis of the nonstructural protein (NS) genes showed that the viruses isolated in this study were classified into three lineages, in which the EA H1N1 lineage included 8 H1N1 viruses, the TR H1N2 lineage included 10 H1N1 viruses, and the 2009/H1N1 lineage included 4 H1N2 viruses (Fig. 2G).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Genetic relationships among the HA genes and genotype analysis of H1N1 SIVs. The unrooted tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with the maximum composite likelihood model and MEGA7 (www.megasoftware.net) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates, based on nucleotide positions 33 to 1733. Scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The red triangles indicate viruses characterized in this study. EA, Eurasian avian-like; CS, classical swine; Hu, human; TR, triple reassortant. The colors of the bars represent the groups in the tree.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Phylogenetic analyses of the other seven genes of H1N1 SIVs. The unrooted trees were based on nucleotide positions 21 to 1430 for N1 NA (A), 28 to 2307 for PB2 (B), 25 to 2298 for PB1 (C), 25 to 2175 for PA (D), 46 to 1542 for NP (E), 26 to 1007 for M (F), and 27 to 864 for NS (G). Scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The red triangles indicate viruses characterized in this study. EA, Eurasian avian-like; CS, classical swine; Hu, human; TR, triple reassortant.

To further provide a systematic evolutionary analysis of the H1N1 SIVs isolated in mainland China, we analyzed the genomic sequences of all the 247 H1N1 reference strains and 18 H1N1 viruses isolated in this study (Fig. 3). To date, a total of 16 genotypes of H1N1 SIVs have been reported. Prior to 2009, CS H1N1 viruses were predominantly isolated from pigs, and Hu H1N1 and EA H1N1 viruses were only sporadically isolated. After 2009, EA H1N1 and 2009/H1N1 viruses were repeatedly isolated from pigs. Apart from H1N1, the TR H1N2 virus was another important subtype of influenza virus that consistently circulated in the swine population. Since the emergence of the 2009/H1N1 virus in pigs, pure 2009/H1N1 viruses were only isolated from 2009 to 2011 but continuously provided one or more internal genes to other endemic SIVs. Genetic reassortment occurred frequently between different influenza viruses. Here, six and two types of double reassortant H1N1 viruses were detected between EA H1N1 and 2009/H1N1 and between EA H1N1 and TR H1N2 viruses, respectively, during 2010 and 2014. Furthermore, four types of triple reassortant H1N1 viruses among EA H1N1, 2009/H1N1, and TR H1N2 were isolated from pigs during 2013 and 2016 (Fig. 3). Also, as shown in Fig. 1, 18 H1N1 viruses isolated in this study were classified into four genotypes, including G3, G6, G14, and G15, which indicates that multiple genotypes of H1N1 SIVs cocirculated in pigs in Liaoning Province.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Genotype evolution of the H1N1 SIVs isolated in mainland China. The whole-genome sequences analyzed here include 18 H1N1 viruses isolated in this study and 247 H1N1 reference strains downloaded from GISAID (https://platform.gisaid.org/) until July 2019. n, number of the viruses belonging to the indicated genotype.

Diverse pathogenicities of the isolates in mice.

To evaluate the virulence of the 10 representative isolates, groups of mice were intranasally (i.n.) inoculated with 105 50% egg infective dose (EID50) of the indicated viruses. Compared with the control group, all the infected mice, except those inoculated with A/swine/Liaoning/CY102/2014 (H1N1) (CY102) and A/swine/Liaoning/SY130/2015(H1N1) (SY130) viruses, showed various degrees of weight loss within 1 week after infection, with the average ratio of decline ranging from 1.6% to 19.3%, respectively (Fig. 4A). In particular, four of the mice in the group infected with the A/swine/Liaoning/ZD71/2015 (H1N1) (ZD71) virus and two mice infected with the A/swine/Liaoning/FX224/2016 (H1N2) (FX224) virus showed weight loss with the ratio exceeding 25% and were, therefore, considered dead during the observation period after infection (Fig. 4B). At 3 days postinfection (dpi), no virus was detected in the brain, spleen, or kidneys of the mice infected with all the viruses (data not shown). Viruses were simultaneously detected in the nasal turbinates (NTs) and lungs of mice infected with nine viruses, with the average viral titers ranging from 2.25 log10 EID50/ml to 5.17 log10 EID50/ml in the NTs and from 4.17 log10 EID50/ml to 6.5 log10 EID50/ml in the lungs, respectively. Interestingly, CY102 was only detected in the lungs with a titer of 5.75 log10 EID50/ml, but not in the NT at 3 dpi (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that variations in virulence and replication capability exist among these H1N1 SIVs in mice. At the end of the experiment, all infected mice seroconverted, with the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers ranging from 80 to 640, which indicated that these viruses could directly infect mice without adaptation.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Pathogenicity of the viruses in mice. (A) Weight changes, (B) survival curves, and (C) virus titration in the NTs and lungs of the mice after viral infection. Groups of mice were i.n. infected with 105 EID50 of the indicated viruses in a volume of 50 μl, and mice in the control group were i.n. inoculated with 50 μl of PBS. The body weights of all the mice were monitored daily for 2 weeks. Values indicate the mean weight changes of all the mice in each group after infection. At 3 dpi, the lungs and NTs were collected and titrated in eggs. Values indicate the mean viral titers in the lungs or NTs of three mice and are expressed as the mean ± SD. Samples for which the virus was not detected were assigned a numeric value of 0.5 for calculation purposes. The dashed horizontal line indicates the limit of detection.

Rescued SY130 and ZD71 viruses maintained the properties of their parental wild-type viruses.

As described above, the viruses SY130 and ZD71 shared similar genetic backgrounds and belonged to the same genotype but displayed substantially different levels of virulence in mice. SY130 only induced slight weight loss within 2 weeks after infection, whereas ZD71 showed higher virulence in mice, causing death in four out of five mice, as evaluated by 25% weight loss. To explore the molecular basis for these differences in virulence in mice, eight plasmid reverse genetic systems (RGSs) were established for the SY130 and ZD71 viruses, and both recombinant viruses (designated r-SY130 and r-ZD71) were rescued and confirmed by sequence analysis. Growth in MDCK cells and replication capacity in mice showed that the rescued viruses shared the same replication characteristics as their parental wild-type (wt) viruses (Fig. 5A and B). In addition, the 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD50) was determined for both the rescued and parental wt viruses. The MLD50 values for the r-SY130 and wt-SY130 viruses were both above 6.5 log10 EID50, while the MLD50 values of for the r-ZD71 and wt-ZD71 viruses were 4.32 log10 EID50 (Fig. 5C to F). These results demonstrated that both of the rescued viruses maintained the properties of their parental wt viruses in terms of viral replication and virulence in mice.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Establishment of RGSs for the SY130 and ZD71 viruses. (A) Growth kinetics in MDCK cells, (B) replication capacity in mice, and (C to F) MLD50 determination of the rescued and parental viruses. MDCK cells (MOI, 0.001) were inoculated with wt-SY130, r-SY130, wt-ZD71, and r-ZD71. Supernatants were collected at 12-h intervals until 72 hpi and titrated in MDCK cells by TCID50. In each panel, the average of three replicates is shown, with error bars indicating the SD. Groups of three mice were i.n. inoculated with 106 EID50 (in a 50 μl volume) of the indicated viruses. At 3 dpi, the NTs and lungs were collected and titrated in eggs. Groups of five mice were inoculated with doses of 101 to 106 EID50 of virus in a 50-μl volume, and MLD50 values were calculated using the method of Reed and Muench.

The PB2 gene plays a major role in the difference in the pathogenicity between SY130 and ZD71 viruses.

Based on the respective genetic alignments of SY130 and ZD71, we found that these two viruses shared the same M protein sequence but differed in their PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, and NS proteins at the amino acid level. As shown in Table 1, we listed all the amino acids which were different between the two viruses. To identify which of these gene segments were responsible for the different virulence in mice, a total of 14 reassortant viruses were generated by exchanging a single gene between the r-SY130 and r-ZD71 viruses as described previously (34), and their MLD50 values were determined by measuring the weight loss of mice (Fig. 6A to G, and Fig. 6I to O). Compared with the parental r-SY130 virus, a single HA or NA gene substitution introduced into the SY130 virus did not affect virulence (Fig. 6D and F), whereas substitution of the NP, NS, or PB1 gene could increase the virulence to a certain extent (Fig. 6E, G, and B). The SY130-based reassortants carrying the PA and PB2 genes of ZD71 virus displayed virulence enhancement, with MLD50 values of 5.83 log10 EID50 and 4.5 log10 EID50, respectively (Fig. 6C and A). The ZD71-based reassortant viruses carrying a single PB1, NA, and NS gene segment from the SY130 virus showed similar MLD50 values to that of the parental r-ZD71 virus (Fig. 6J, N and O), whereas the reassortants carrying a single PB2, PA, and NP gene segment showed attenuated virulence in mice, with their MLD50 values increasing from 4.32 log10 EID50 to 5.68, 5.38, and 5.63 log10 EID50, respectively (Fig. 6I, K and M). Interestingly, we found that the HA gene of SY130 increased the virulence of the reassortant ZD71-HA virus to a certain extent, and its MLD50 value was 3.0 log10 EID50 (Fig. 6L). These results indicate that multiple genes determine the different viral pathogenicities of the ZD71 and SY130 viruses in mice, but the PB2 gene plays the most important role in the difference of viral pathogenicity between these two H1N1 viruses.

TABLE 1.

Amino acid differences between the SY130 and ZD71 virusesa

Gene Amino acid position Amino acid carried by the indicated strain
SY130 ZD71
PB2 172 V M
431 T M
448 N Y
453 S P
PB1 14 V A
216 G D
PB1-F2 47 N S
83 F S
PA 100 V I
651 S A
PA-X 100 V I
HAb 4 A V
138 S A
144 A T
225 E G
NP 2 V A
384 R K
NA 79 A V
NS1 36 L I
56 T A
197 S N
NS2 40 V I
72 K R
a

No amino acid differences were observed between the M genes of these two viruses.

b

The amino acid positions of HA are H3 numbering.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

The reassortant viruses generated by single-gene substitutions and their virulence in mice. MLD50 determination of the reassortant viruses generated with SY130 (A to H) and ZD71 (I to P) as background. Groups of five mice were i.n. inoculated with doses of 101 to 106 EID50 of virus in a 50-μl volume, and MLD50 values were calculated using the method of Reed and Muench.

Identification of amino acid residues involved in the virulence difference between the two viruses.

According to the results obtained with the reassortant viruses generated by single-gene substitution, we found that the PB2 protein was a key viral protein determining the differences in virulence between the SY130 and ZD71 viruses in mice. As shown in Table 1, the PB2 proteins of the SY130 and ZD71 viruses differed at four amino acids at positions 172, 431, 448, and 453. Next, to determine which amino acid residue(s) contributed to the different virulence of SY130 and ZD71 viruses, we generated four mutant reassortant viruses by introducing the amino acid changes V172M, T431M, N448Y, and S453P individually into the r-SY130 virus and generated another four mutants by introducing the reverse mutations into the r-ZD71 virus. Then, we determined the MLD50 values of all the mutants and compared them with the parental r-SY130 and r-ZD71 viruses. The mutant SY130-PB2V172M, SY130-PB2N448Y, and SY130-PB2S453P viruses still showed low virulence, but the SY130-PB2T431M virus acquired high virulence in mice with the MLD50 value increasing to 4.38 log10 EID50 (Fig. 7A to D). Conversely, the mutant ZD71-PB2M431T became less virulent in mice (MLD50 of 4.32 log10 EID50 versus 5.32 log10 EID50) (Fig. 7F). These results demonstrate that the amino acid substitution at position 431 in the PB2 protein significantly affects the virulence of these two H1N1 viruses in mice.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

The reassortant viruses (PB2 mutant) generated by site-directed mutagenesis and their virulence in mice. MLD50 determination of the reassortant viruses generated with SY130 (A–D) and ZD71 (E–H) as background. Groups of five mice were i.n. inoculated with doses of 101 to 106 EID50 of virus in a 50-μl volume, and MLD50 values were calculated using the method of Reed and Muench.

The amino acid at site 431 in the PB2 protein impacts viral replication in vitro and in vivo.

To determine whether the single amino acid at site 431 in the PB2 protein influences virus growth dynamics in MDCK or A549 cells, we compared the growth curves of SY130-PB2T431M and ZD71-PB2M431T with those of the respective parental r-SY130 and r-ZD71 viruses, respectively. When the T431M substitution was introduced into the r-SY130 virus, SY130-PB2T431M displayed significantly increased replication compared with the parental r-SY130 virus in MDCK cells during 12 and 48 hours postinfection (hpi), as well as in A549 cells at all the time points (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 8A). In contrast, the M431T substitution decreased replication of the ZD71-PB2M431T virus in MDCK cells, as well as in A549 cells, and the effects on the viral replication titer were mainly evident in the late stage of infection (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 8B). We further compared the replication capacities of SY130-PB2T431M and ZD71-PB2M431T in mice with those of the parental r-SY130 and r-ZD71 viruses, respectively. We found that the SY130-PB2T431M virus could be detected at a significantly higher titer than the parental r-SY130 virus, with the titer increasing from 5.75 to 7.33 log10 EID50/ml in the lungs and from 4.17 to 6.67 log10 EID50/ml in the NT (Fig. 8C). The titers of ZD71-PB2M431T in the lung were also significantly decreased compared with the parental r-ZD71 virus, with the titer decreasing from 7.67 to 6.5 log10 EID50/ml. The viral replication of ZD71-PB2M431T was also reduced compared with the wt virus in the NT, to some extent (Fig. 8C). These results further indicate that a single amino acid substitution at site 431 in the PB2 protein significantly affects the viral replication capacities of these viruses in vitro and in vivo.

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Effects of amino acid substitutions at residue 431 in PB2 on the viral replication capacity of mutant virus in vitro (A and B) and in vivo (C). MDCK cells (MOI, 0.001) or A549 cells (MOI, 0.1) were inoculated with r-SY130, SY130-PB2T431M, r-ZD71, and ZD71-PB2M431T. Supernatants were collected at 12-h intervals until 72 hpi and titrated in MDCK cells by TCID50. In each panel, the average of three replicates is shown, with error bars indicating the SD. Groups of three mice were i.n. inoculated with 106 EID50 (in a 50-μl volume) of r-SY130, SY130-PB2T431M, r-ZD71, and ZD71-PB2M431T virus. At 3 dpi, the NTs and lungs were collected and titrated in eggs. Data shown are the mean viral titers ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. (a) P < 0.0001, (b) P < 0.001, (c) P < 0.01, and (d) P < 0.05 indicate titers compared with the corresponding viral replication titer of the parental and mutant viruses at the same time points or in the same organs of mice.

The amino acid residue at position 431 in the PB2 protein alters the viral polymerase activity.

To investigate how the PB2 gene affects the viral virulence of SY130 and ZD71 viruses, we applied a minigenome reporter assay to assess the impact of the amino acid at position 431 in the PB2 protein on the polymerase activity in HEK293T cells. We first compared the polymerase activities of the wt RNP of the SY130 and ZD71 viruses and found that the relative activity of ZD71 was more than 47-fold higher than that of SY130 (Fig. 9). Then, we tested the polymerase activity of the reconstituted RNP containing the single-gene substitution or mutant PB2 and compared it with that of the parental RNP of the SY130 and ZD71 viruses. As shown in Fig. 9, the PB2, PB1, PA, and NP genes of the ZD71 virus could increase the relative activities of the respective RNP of SY130-PB2, SY130-PB1, SY130-PA, and SY130-NP by approximately 7.0-, 3.4-, 3.0-, and 1.3-fold, which suggests that the PB2 gene had the most significant effect on viral polymerase activity. We further tested the relative activities of the mutant RNP by introducing the individual mutation into the PB2 gene of SY130 at positions 172, 431, 448, and 453, respectively. Compared with the wt-SY130, no significant change was observed for SY130-PB2V172M, SY130-PB2N448Y, and SY130-PB2S453P. However, PB2-431M in RNP significantly increased the polymerase activity of SY130-PB2T431M. Conversely, the PB2 gene of the SY130 virus and the PB2 431T mutation were associated with a significant decrease in polymerase activity of the ZD71-PB2 and ZD71-PB2M431T viruses in HEK293T cells (Fig. 9). These results indicate that the amino acid at position 431, but not those at positions 172, 448, and 453 in the PB2 protein, contributes to the difference in the polymerase activities of the SY130 and ZD71 viruses, which further suggests that the different virulence and replication capacity of these two viruses are due to their different viral polymerase activities.

FIG 9.

FIG 9

Viral polymerase activity of RNP complexes. HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated PB2, PB1, PA, and NP genes in pcDNA3.1(+) together with the luciferase reporter plasmid pPolI-Luc. Cells were also cotransfected with a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (pRL-TK) to control for transfection efficiency. As a control, samples lacking pcDNA3.1-NP were included. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, firefly and Renilla luciferase levels were measured, and Renilla expression was used to normalize the data. The relative activity of wt-SY130 RNP was set as 100%, and the relative activities of other reassortant RNPs were presented relative to that. Results shown are the averages with SD from three independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001 and *, P < 0.05 indicate values compared with the corresponding values of polymerase activity of RNP carrying the parental and mutant PB2 protein.

Amino acid analysis of site 431 in the PB2 protein of influenza A viruses.

To investigate the prevalence of 431M or 431T of the PB2 protein among influenza viruses, we downloaded the full-length and partial PB2 sequences from the NCBI Influenza Virus Resource database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/Database/nph-select.cgi?go=database) until 8 September 2019 and performed a comprehensive sequence analysis with regard to position 431 of the PB2 protein. As shown in Table 2, PB2-431M was highly conserved among all the available sequences of H1N1 viruses isolated from swine, avian, and human, and the percentages were 97.3%, 96.3%, and 98.5%, respectively. The amino acid variant 431T was exceedingly rare among the H1N1 isolates, with only one avian H1N1 virus carrying PB2-431T (Table 2). We further analyzed the percentages of PB2-431M and PB2-431T among all the available sequences of the other subtype influenza viruses, including H1N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N9, and H9N2. The results also revealed high conservation of PB2-431M among these viruses. In particular, all the H1N2, H3N2, H5N1, and H7N9 viruses possessed PB2-431M, and only one avian H9N2 virus carried PB2-431T (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Amino acid frequencies at position 431 in the PB2 protein of different subtype influenza virusesa

Virus subtype (n) Host (n) Frequency (%) of amino acid at PB2 residue 431 (n)
M X - T L K V
H1N1 (17,013) Swine (2,560) 97.3 (2,491) 0.4 (10) 2.3 (59) / / / /
Avian (629) 96.3 (606) / 3.5 (22) 0.2 (1) / / /
Human (13,824) 98.5 (13,616) 0.21 (29) 1.28 (177) / 0.03 (2) / /
H1N2 (1,946) 95.7 (1,863) / 4.3 (83) / / / /
H3N2 (21,830) 99.3 (21,678) 0.1 (12) 0.6 (140) / / / /
H5N1 (3,313) 96.8 (3,206) 0.1 (4) 3.1 (103) / / / /
H7N9 (855) 99.8 (853) / 0.23 (2) / / / /
H9N2 (2,721) 93.3 (2,538) 0.3 (9) 6.3 (171) 0.04 (1) / 0.04 (1) 0.04 (1)
a

The amino acid frequencies were determined for unique PB2 full-length sequences and partial sequences collected using the indicated criteria from the NCBI Influenza Virus Resource database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/Database/nph-select.cgi?go=database). n, number of sequences analyzed; X, amino acid deletion; /, not found; -, not determined.

M431T substitution in the PB2 protein attenuated the other H1N1 viruses in mice.

To assess whether one particular residue was responsible for the attenuation of virulence in mice, we introduced the same amino acid change into a reassortant H1N1 virus (A/Hunan/42443/2015 [HuN42443]) previously isolated from human, which showed high virulence in C57BL/6J mice (26). In this study, we simultaneously rescued the parental HuN42443 (r-HuN42443) and mutant HuN42443 bearing the M431T substitution (r-mHuN42443) by using RGS and tested their replication capacities and pathogenicities in BALB/c mice. We found that the r-mHuN42443 virus displayed decreased replication both in MDCK and A549 cells, as well as in vivo, compared with the parental r-HuN42443 virus (Fig. 10A and B). Moreover, r-mHuN42443 also showed lower virulence in BALB/c mice than the parental r-HuN42443 virus, with the MLD50 value increasing from 3.5 to 5.63 log10EID50 (Fig. 10C and D). Polymerase activity was significantly decreased when the PB2 protein harboring M431T was introduced into the parental RNP complex (Fig. 10E). These results confirm that PB2 M431T is a major factor that affects the virulence of H1N1 SIV in mice.

FIG 10.

FIG 10

M431T substitution in the PB2 protein attenuated the virulence of HuN42443 virus in mice. Viral replication of the parental r-HuN42443 and mutant r-mHuN42443 virus in MDCK and A549 cells (A), as well as in mice (B); MLD50 determination of the parental r-HuN42443 and the mutant r-mHuN42443 virus (C, D); M431T substitution downregulated the polymerase activity of RNP of r-mHuN42443 (E). (a) P < 0.0001, (b) P < 0.001, (c) P < 0.01, and (d) P < 0.05 indicate titers compared with the corresponding viral titer of the parental and the mutant viruses at the same time point or in the same organs of mice. ****, P < 0.0001 indicates values compared with the corresponding values of polymerase activity of RNP carrying the parental and mutant PB2 protein.

DISCUSSION

Genetic reassortment is considered the main mechanism for the emergence of novel influenza viruses to escape the preexisting immunity of the host. Previous studies reported that the pandemic 2009/H1N1 and EA H1N1 viruses have been isolated in pigs in Liaoning Province (31, 33, 35). In the present study, we examined the genetic composition of influenza viruses isolated during the active surveillance of pigs from 2014 to 2016 in this region. Our data indicated that four different genotypes of H1N1 SIVs coexisted in pigs, including the pure EA H1N1 (G3), double reassortant (G6), and triple reassortant H1N1 (G14 and G15). In addition, the TR H1N2 viruses were also isolated, which were genetically similar to the previously reported isolates (15). Among the reassortant H1N1 viruses isolated in our study, G6-like and G14-like viruses were only sporadically detected in 2014, while G15-like reassortants were repeatedly isolated between 2014 and 2016 in Liaoning Province. Recent surveillance results from other provinces in China confirmed the multiple genomic characteristics of SIVs (19, 20). Especially, G15-like viruses were continuously isolated, which suggested that these kinds of reassortant viruses have become established in the swine population. Of note, the TR H1N1 viruses (HuN42443) bearing G15-like genetic compositions have been detected in human (26), as well as in canine (36), in China. Further studies demonstrated that the human G15-like reassortant H1N1 virus showed higher virulence than human EA H1N1 virus in the mouse model, which highlights the potential risk of SIV to public health.

The pathogenicity of influenza virus in mammals is complex and determined by multiple viral genes (3743). In this study, we simultaneously tested the pathogenicities of EA H1N1 and the reassortant viruses carrying the internal genes of the 2009/H1N1 virus in mice and found that all the viruses could replicate efficiently in vivo and caused certain weight losses, and some viruses led to severe disease or even the death of mice. Of interest, we found that a pair of viruses, namely, SY130 and ZD71, shared the highest sequence identity, ranging from 98.2% to 100%, for the eight gene segments but exhibited significantly different pathogenicity in mice. SY130 did not cause the apparent weight loss in mice when infected with 105 EID50, whereas, the ZD71 virus caused significant weight loss in mice, which was clinically considered the cause of death. An alignment of the genomes of these two viruses showed that they differed by 23 amino acids spanning in the 7 gene fragments, with the exception of the M gene. This observation raised the possibility that as yet unknown molecular determinants may affect the virulence of SIVs in mice.

As an important component of the viral polymerase complex, the PB2 protein is a viral polymerase with 759-amino acid residues composed of an N-terminal domain, a middle domain, a cap-binding domain, a 627 domain, and an NLS domain (44, 45). Several residues in the PB2 protein have been previously identified as virulence markers as well as factors contributing to interspecies transmission of influenza A viruses in mammals (39, 4649). In particular, some mutations, such as E627K, D701N, E158R, A271T, Q591R, H357N, T558I, K339T, A588T, I147T, and I292V (46, 47, 5056), in the PB2 protein are essential to determine the pathogenesis of influenza viruses in mammals. In this study, we first demonstrated that the PB2 protein had a major effect on the viral pathogenicity of two H1N1 SIVs, with the other genes playing only minor roles in virulence. Then, we further identified the T431M amino acid substitution in the PB2 protein responsible for virulence difference in mice between SY130 and ZD71 viruses. We also evaluated the viral replication capacities in vitro and in vivo and their polymerase activities in mammalian cells. The results showed that the amino acid at site 431 in the PB2 protein significantly influences viral virulence and replication capacity in vitro and in vivo by affecting the polymerase activity of RNP. Our results support that amino acids in the cap-binding domain of PB2 specifically contributed to the replication process of avian influenza viruses in human cells and virulence in mice (57, 58). Finally, we verified our findings by introducing the M431T substitution into the PB2 protein of a human H1N1 virus (HuN42443), which shared the same genomic characteristics with the ZD71 virus. Similar results were observed in our study when evaluated by replication capacity, virulence, and polymerase activity, indicating that the functional role of the single amino acid residue 431 in the PB2 protein was not strain specific.

In conclusion, our virological surveillance results demonstrated that SIVs of multiple genotypes and diverse virulence cocirculate in a specific region, which makes the epidemiology of swine influenza more complex and emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring of influenza viruses in pigs. Also, we identified a novel virulence marker at residue 431 in PB2 of the H1N1 SIVs that significantly affects virulence in mice. Whether this amino acid substitution affects viral transmission requires further investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement and facility.

The present study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. All studies with live viruses were carried out in a biosecurity level 2 laboratory approved for such use by the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute (HVRI) of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the HVRI of the CAAS.

Sample collection and virus isolation.

Between November 2014 and December 2016, a total of 5,750 nasal swabs were collected from pigs in slaughterhouses located in Liaoning Province, China. The samples were placed in a transport medium that consisted of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing penicillin (2000 U/ml) and streptomycin (2,000 μg/ml). All of the individual samples were inoculated into 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs for 72 h at 36°C. The allantoic fluid was collected and tested for hemagglutination activity with 0.5% chicken red blood cells. When the assay was positive, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was then performed to further identify HA and NA subtypes, as described previously (11).

Full-length sequencing and phylogenetic analyses.

The identified viruses were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analyses. Viral RNA (vRNA) was extracted from virus-infected allantoic fluid using a QIAamp viral RNA minikit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). cDNAs were synthesized from vRNAs by RT with the Uni12 primer and were amplified by PCR with primers complementary to the conserved promoter and noncoding regions of each gene segment (the primer sequences are available upon request). The coding sequences for the entire genomes of the viruses were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 3500xL genetic analyzer at the HVRI. The DNA sequences were compiled and edited using Lasergene 7.1 software (DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI, USA). For phylogenetic analysis, in addition to the full genomes of all the viruses we sequenced in this study, those of the 247 H1N1 viruses previously isolated in mainland China were also downloaded from GISAID. The phylogenetic tree of the isolates was generated by the distance-based neighbor-joining method using software MEGA7 (www.megasoftware.net). The reliability of the tree was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. Horizontal distances are proportional to genetic distance. Phylogenetic analysis of the eight gene segments was based on alignments of the open reading frames of the respective fragment.

Viral infection in mouse model.

Ten isolates, including 9 H1N1 and 1 H1N2, were chosen to test their pathogenicity in mice. The virus stocks were prepared by propagating in 10-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs, followed by determining the EID50 as described previously (15). A total of 88 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (Vital River Laboratories, Beijing, China) were randomly divided into 11 groups, of which 10 groups were i.n. inoculated with 105 EID50 of each virus in a 50-μl volume. The remaining mice were i.n. inoculated with 50 μl of PBS as a mock control. All mice were weighed daily after infection. Three mice from each group were euthanized on 3 dpi to evaluate viral replication in the organs. At necropsy, brain, NT, lung, spleen, and kidney were collected and titrated in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs. The remaining mice were observed for clinical signs, their body weights were measured until 14 dpi, and mice that lost more than 25% of their initial body weight were euthanized on humane grounds. The serum samples were collected from mice at 14 dpi for seroconversion confirmation.

Virus rescue.

Based on the pathogenesis of the isolates in mice, a pair of viruses possessing similar genetic characteristics but exhibiting different virulence in mice was chosen as model viruses to further investigate the factors involved in viral pathogenicity. First, RGSs for the two parent viruses were established by inserting the full-length cDNA derived from the indicated virus into the vRNA-mRNA bidirectional transcription vector pHW2000 (the plasmid was kindly provided by Richard Webby at St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) as described previously (59). Then, a series of reassortants were generated by a single-gene substitution and site-directed mutagenesis. Recombinant viruses were rescued by transfection in HEK293T cells and propagated in 10-day-old SPF embryonated chicken eggs, followed by whole-genome sequencing to ensure the absence of unwanted mutations. The sequences of primers for virus rescue are available upon request.

Viral replication kinetics in vitro.

To determine the growth of the parental and recombinant viruses in vitro, MDCK cells and A549 cells were infected with the indicated viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001 and 0.1, respectively. After 1 h, MDCK cells were incubated at 37°C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 1 μg/ml tolylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin and A549 in Ham’s F-12K medium containing 0.25 μg/ml of TPCK-treated trypsin. Supernatants were collected 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h after infection and stored at –80°C. The viral titers were determined by endpoint titration in MDCK cells and expressed as mean log10 TCID50/ml ± standard deviation (SD).

Viral replication capacity in vivo.

To evaluate the replication capacity of each virus in vivo, we euthanized three mice at 3 dpi with 106 EID50 of each indicated virus, harvested the organs (including NT and lung), and titrated for virus infectivity in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs. Titers were calculated by the Reed-Muench method (60) and expressed as mean log10 EID50/ml ± SD. A value of 0.5 was assigned to virus titration-negative samples for statistical purposes.

Determination of the MLD50.

The MLD50 values of the two parent wt viruses and all the rescued viruses were determined by inoculating i.n. groups of 5 BALB/c mice with 10-fold serial dilutions (101 to 106 EID50) of viruses in 50 μl of PBS. Body weight was measured daily for 14 dpi, and the mice that lost more than 25% of their original weight were euthanized for humane reasons. The MLD50 values were calculated by the Reed-Muench method (60) after a 14-day observation period and were expressed as log10 EID50.

Polymerase activity analysis.

Polymerase activity was measured using a minigenome assay as previously described (61). In brief, subconfluent monolayers of HEK293T cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid (pPolI-Luc) together with the pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and pcDNA3.1(+) plasmid constructs with various combinations of the polymerase genes PB2 (parental or mutant), PB1, PA, and NP using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as recommended by the manufacturer. pRL-TK expresses Renilla luciferase and was used as an internal transfection control for the dual-luciferase assay. After 6 h of incubation at 37°C, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cell extracts were harvested 24 h posttransfection, and luciferase activity was assayed by using the Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Polymerase activity was calculated by standardization of the firefly luciferase activity to the Renilla luciferase activity. The polymerase activity of the wt-SY130 RNP was set as 100%. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis.

Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). A probability (P) value of <0.05 was considered to be a statistically significant difference, while a P value of <0.01 was considered to be a highly significant difference. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test and ordinary one-way ANOVA were used.

Data availability.

The eight gene segments of the isolates were sequenced and have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN393701 to MN393876.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank International Science Editing for editing the manuscript.

The study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872472) and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (20170540478).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Shope RE. 1931. Swine influenza: I. Experimental transmission and pathology. J Exp Med 54:349–359. doi: 10.1084/jem.54.3.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Memoli MJ, Tumpey TM, Jagger BW, Dugan VG, Sheng Z, Qi L, Kash JC, Taubenberger JK. 2009. An early “classical” swine H1N1 influenza virus shows similar pathogenicity to the 1918 pandemic virus in ferrets and mice. Virology 393:338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pensaert M, Ottis K, Vandeputte J, Kaplan MM, Bachmann PA. 1981. Evidence for the natural transmission of influenza A virus from wild ducts to swine and its potential importance for man. Bull World Health Organ 59:75–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karasin AI, Olsen CW, Anderson GA. 2000. Genetic characterization of an H1N2 influenza virus isolated from a pig in Indiana. J Clin Microbiol 38:2453–2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith GJD, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Lycett SJ, Worobey M, Pybus OG, Ma SK, Cheung CL, Raghwani J, Bhatt S, Peiris JSM, Guan Y, Rambaut A. 2009. Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature 459:1122–1125. doi: 10.1038/nature08182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, Sessions WM, Xu X, Skepner E, Deyde V, Okomo-Adhiambo M, Gubareva L, Barnes J, Smith CB, Emery SL, Hillman MJ, Rivailler P, Smagala J, de Graaf M, Burke DF, Fouchier RA, Pappas C, Alpuche-Aranda CM, Lopez-Gatell H, Olivera H, Lopez I, Myers CA, Faix D, Blair PJ, Yu C, Keene KM, Dotson PJ, Boxrud D, Sambol AR, Abid SH, St GK, Bannerman T, Moore AL, Stringer DJ, Blevins P, Demmler-Harrison GJ, Ginsberg M, Kriner P, Waterman S, Smole S, Guevara HF, Belongia EA, Clark PA, Beatrice ST, Donis R, Katz J, Finelli L, Bridges CB, Shaw M, Jernigan DB, Uyeki TM, Smith DJ, Klimov AI, Cox NJ. 2009. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 325:197–201. doi: 10.1126/science.1176225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Howden KJ, Brockhoff EJ, Caya FD, McLeod LJ, Lavoie M, Ing JD, Bystrom JM, Alexandersen S, Pasick JM, Berhane Y, Morrison ME, Keenliside JM, Laurendeau S, Rohonczy EB. 2009. An investigation into human pandemic influenza virus (H1N1) 2009 on an Alberta swine farm. Can Vet J 50:1153–1161. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Welsh MD, Baird PM, Guelbenzu-Gonzalo MP, Hanna A, Reid SM, Essen S, Russell C, Thomas S, Barrass L, McNeilly F, McKillen J, Todd D, Harkin V, McDowell S, Choudhury B, Irvine RM, Borobia J, Grant J, Brown IH. 2010. Initial incursion of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A virus into European pigs. Vet Rec 166:642–645. doi: 10.1136/vr.4851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Song M-S, Lee JH, Pascua PNQ, Baek YH, Kwon H-I, Park KJ, Choi H-W, Shin Y-K, Song J-Y, Kim C-J, Choi Y-K. 2010. Evidence of human-to-swine transmission of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus in South Korea. J Clin Microbiol 48:3204–3211. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00053-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Howard WA, Essen SC, Strugnell BW, Russell C, Barass L, Reid SM, Brown IH. 2011. Reassortant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in pigs, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1049–1052. doi: 10.3201/eid/1706.101886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen Y, Zhang J, Qiao C, Yang H, Zhang Y, Xin X, Chen H. 2013. Co-circulation of pandemic 2009 H1N1, classical swine H1N1 and avian-like swine H1N1 influenza viruses in pigs in China. Infect Genet Evol 13:331–338. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scholtissek C. 1990. Pigs as “mixing vessels” for the creation of new pandemic influenza A viruses. Med Princ Pract 2:65–71. doi: 10.1159/000157337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ducatez MF, Hause B, Stigger-Rosser E, Darnell D, Corzo C, Juleen K, Simonson R, Brockwell-Staats C, Rubrum A, Wang D, Webb A, Crumpton J, Lowe J, Gramer M, Webby RJ. 2011. Multiple reassortment between pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and endemic influenza viruses in pigs, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1624–1629. doi: 10.3201/eid1709.110338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liang H, Lam TT-Y, Fan X, Chen X, Zeng Y, Zhou J, Duan L, Tse M, Chan C-H, Li L, Leung T-Y, Yip C-H, Cheung C-L, Zhou B, Smith DK, Poon LL-M, Peiris M, Guan Y, Zhu H. 2014. Expansion of genotypic diversity and establishment of 2009 H1N1 pandemic-origin internal genes in pigs in China. J Virol 88:10864–10874. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01327-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qiao C, Liu L, Yang H, Chen Y, Xu H, Chen H. 2014. Novel triple reassortant H1N2 influenza viruses bearing six internal genes of the pandemic 2009/H1N1 influenza virus were detected in pigs in China. J Clin Virol 61:529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Watson SJ, ESNIP3 Consortium, Langat P, Reid SM, Lam TT, Cotten M, Kelly M, Van Reeth K, Qiu Y, Simon G, Bonin E, Foni E, Chiapponi C, Larsen L, Hjulsager C, Markowska-Daniel I, Urbaniak K, Durrwald R, Schlegel M, Huovilainen A, Davidson I, Dan A, Loeffen W, Edwards S, Bublot M, Vila T, Maldonado J, Valls L, Brown IH, Pybus OG, Kellam P. 2015. Molecular epidemiology and evolution of influenza viruses circulating within European swine between 2009 and 2013. J Virol 89:9920–9931. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00840-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takemae N, Harada M, Nguyen PT, Nguyen T, Nguyen TN, To TL, Nguyen TD, Pham VP, Le VT, Do HT, Vo HV, Le QVT, Tran TM, Nguyen TD, Thai PD, Nguyen DH, Le AQT, Nguyen DT, Uchida Y, Saito T. 2016. Influenza a viruses of swine (IAV-S) in Vietnam from 2010 to 2015: multiple introductions of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses into the pig population and diversifying genetic constellations of enzootic IAV-S. J Virol 91:e01490-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01490-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rajão DS, Walia RR, Campbell B, Gauger PC, Janas-Martindale A, Killian ML, Vincent AL. 2017. Reassortment between swine H3N2 and 2009 pandemic H1N1 in the United States resulted in influenza a viruses with diverse genetic constellations with variable virulence in pigs. J Virol 91:e01763-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01763-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He P, Wang G, Mo Y, Yu Q, Xiao X, Yang W, Zhao W, Guo X, Chen Q, He J, Liang M, Zhu J, Ding Y, Wei Z, Ouyang K, Liu F, Jian H, Huang W, García-Sastre A, Chen Y. 2019. Novel triple-reassortant influenza viruses in pigs, Guangxi, China. Emerg Microbes Infec 7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0088-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cao Z, Zeng W, Hao X, Huang J, Cai M, Zhou P, Zhang G. 2019. Continuous evolution of influenza A viruses of swine from 2013 to 2015 in Guangdong, China. PLoS One 14:e217607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Jong JC, Paccaud MF, de Ronde-Verloop FM, Huffels NH, Verwei C, Weijers TF, Bangma PJ, van Kregten E, Kerckhaert JA, Wicki F, Wunderli W. 1988. Isolation of swine-like influenza A (H1N1) viruses from man in Switzerland and The Netherlands. Ann Inst Pasteur Virol 139:429–437. doi: 10.1016/s0769-2617(88)80078-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shu B, Garten R, Emery S, Balish A, Cooper L, Sessions W, Deyde V, Smith C, Berman L, Klimov A, Lindstrom S, Xu X. 2012. Genetic analysis and antigenic characterization of swine origin influenza viruses isolated from humans in the United States, 1990–2010. Virology 422:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang H, Qiao C, Tang X, Chen Y, Xin X, Chen H. 2012. Human infection from avian-like influenza A (H1N1) viruses in pigs, China. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1144–1146. doi: 10.3201/eid1807.120009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang DY, Qi SX, Li XY, Guo JF, Tan MJ, Han GY, Liu YF, Lan Y, Yang L, Huang WJ, Cheng YH, Zhao X, Bai T, Wang Z, Wei HJ, Xiao N, Shu YL. 2013. Human infection with Eurasian avian-like influenza A (H1N1) virus, China. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1709–1711. doi: 10.3201/eid1910.130420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Epperson S, for the Influenza A (H3N2)v Virus Investigation Team, Jhung M, Richards S, Quinlisk P, Ball L, Moll M, Boulton R, Haddy L, Biggerstaff M, Brammer L, Trock S, Burns E, Gomez T, Wong KK, Katz J, Lindstrom S, Klimov A, Bresee JS, Jernigan DB, Cox N, Finelli L. 2013. Human infections with influenza A(H3N2) variant virus in the United States, 2011–2012. Clin Infect Dis 57:S4–S11. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu W, Zhang H, Xiang X, Zhong L, Yang L, Guo J, Xie Y, Li F, Deng Z, Feng H, Huang Y, Hu S, Xu X, Zou X, Li X, Bai T, Chen Y, Li Z, Li J, Shu Y. 2016. Reassortant Eurasian avian-like influenza A(H1N1) virus from a severely ill Child, Hunan Province, China, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1930–1936. doi: 10.3201/eid2211.160181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rovida F, Piralla A, Marzani F, Moreno A, Campanini G, Mojoli F, Pozzi M, Girello A, Chiapponi C, Vezzoli F, Prati P, Percivalle E, Pavan A, Gramegna M, Iotti G, Baldanti F. 2017. Swine influenza A (H1N1) virus (SIV) infection requiring extracorporeal life support in an immunocompetent adult patient with indirect exposure to pigs, Italy, October 2016. Euro Surveill 22:30456. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.5.30456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Olsen CW, Brammer L, Easterday BC, Arden N, Belay E, Baker I, Cox NJ. 2002. Serologic evidence of H1 swine Influenza virus infection in swine farm residents and employees. Emerg Infect Dis 8:814–819. doi: 10.3201/eid0808.010474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yin X, Yin X, Rao B, Xie C, Zhang P, Qi X, Wei P, Liu H. 2014. Antibodies against avian-like A (H1N1) swine influenza virus among swine farm residents in eastern China. J Med Virol 86:592–596. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fragaszy E, Combating Swine Influenza (COSI) Consortium, Ishola DA, Brown IH, Enstone J, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Simons R, Tucker AW, Wieland B, Williamson SM, Hayward AC, Wood JL. 2016. Increased risk of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza infection in UK pig industry workers compared to a general population cohort. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 10:291–300. doi: 10.1111/irv.12364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang H, Chen Y, Qiao C, He X, Zhou H, Sun Y, Yin H, Meng S, Liu L, Zhang Q, Kong H, Gu C, Li C, Bu Z, Kawaoka Y, Chen H. 2016. Prevalence, genetics, and transmissibility in ferrets of Eurasian avian-like H1N1 swine influenza viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:392–397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522643113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen J, Fu X, Chen Y, He S, Zheng Y, Cao Z, Yu W, Zhou H, Su S, Zhang G. 2014. Identification of four genotypes of H3N2 swine influenza virus in pigs from southern China. Arch Virol 159:2705–2709. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu W, Zhang XH, Wang XD, Wu H. 2010. Isolation, identification and genetic analysis of an H1N1 subtype isolate of swine influenza virus. Bing Du Xue Bao 26:396–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qiao C, Liu Q, Bawa B, Shen H, Qi W, Chen Y, Mok CKP, Garcia-Sastre A, Richt JA, Ma W. 2012. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of reassortant H9 influenza viruses with genes from pandemic H1N1 virus. J Gen Virol 93:2337–2345. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.044040-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu H, Li Y. 2017. Evolution analysis and biological characteristics of a pandemic H1N1 swine influenza virus. Chin J Prev Vet Med 39:94–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen Y, Trovão NS, Wang G, Zhao W, He P, Zhou H, Mo Y, Wei Z, Ouyang K, Huang W, García-Sastre A, Nelson MI. 2018. Emergence and evolution of novel reassortant influenza A viruses in canines in southern China. mBio 9:e00909-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00909-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jackson D, Hossain MJ, Hickman D, Perez DR, Lamb RA. 2008. A new influenza virus virulence determinant: the NS1 protein four C-terminal residues modulate pathogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4381–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800482105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ilyushina NA, Khalenkov AM, Seiler JP, Forrest HL, Bovin NV, Marjuki H, Barman S, Webster RG, Webby RJ. 2010. Adaptation of pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses in mice. J Virol 84:8607–8616. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00159-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Q, Qiao C, Marjuki H, Bawa B, Ma J, Guillossou S, Webby RJ, Richt JA, Ma W. 2012. Combination of PB2 271A and SR polymorphism at positions 590/591 is critical for viral replication and virulence of swine influenza virus in cultured cells and in vivo. J Virol 86:1233–1237. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05699-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Otte A, Sauter M, Daxer MA, McHardy AC, Klingel K, Gabriel G. 2015. Adaptive mutations that occurred during circulation in humans of H1N1 influenza virus in the 2009 pandemic enhance virulence in mice. J Virol 89:7329–7337. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00665-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu G, Zhang X, Gao W, Wang C, Wang J, Sun H, Sun Y, Guo L, Zhang R, Chang K, Liu J, Pu J. 2016. Prevailing PA mutation K356R in avian influenza H9N2 virus increases mammalian replication and pathogenicity. J Virol 90:8105–8114. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00883-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee J, Henningson J, Ma J, Duff M, Lang Y, Li Y, Li Y, Nagy A, Sunwoo S, Bawa B, Yang J, Bai D, Richt JA, Ma W. 2017. Effects of PB1-F2 on the pathogenicity of H1N1 swine influenza virus in mice and pigs. J Gen Virol 98:31–42. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhu W, Feng Z, Chen Y, Yang L, Liu J, Li X, Liu S, Zhou L, Wei H, Gao R, Wang D, Shu Y. 2019. Mammalian-adaptive mutation NP-Q357K in Eurasian H1N1 swine influenza viruses determines the virulence phenotype in mice. Emerg Microbes Infect 8:989–999. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1635873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Boivin S, Hart DJ. 2011. Interaction of the influenza A virus polymerase PB2 C-terminal region with importin α isoforms provides insights into host adaptation and polymerase assembly. J Biol Chem 286:10439–10448. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pflug A, Guilligay D, Reich S, Cusack S. 2014. Structure of influenza A polymerase bound to the viral RNA promoter. Nature 516:355–360. doi: 10.1038/nature14008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Subbarao EK, London W, Murphy BR. 1993. A single amino acid in the PB2 gene of influenza A virus is a determinant of host range. J Virol 67:1761–1764. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.4.1761-1764.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li Z, Chen H, Jiao P, Deng G, Tian G, Li Y, Hoffmann E, Webster RG, Matsuoka Y, Yu K. 2005. Molecular basis of replication of duck H5N1 influenza viruses in a mammalian mouse model. J Virol 79:12058–12064. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.18.12058-12064.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gao Y, Zhang Y, Shinya K, Deng G, Jiang Y, Li Z, Guan Y, Tian G, Li Y, Shi J, Liu L, Zeng X, Bu Z, Xia X, Kawaoka Y, Chen H. 2009. Identification of amino acids in HA and PB2 critical for the transmission of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in a mammalian host. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000709. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Steel J, Lowen AC, Mubareka S, Palese P. 2009. Transmission of influenza virus in a mammalian host is increased by PB2 amino acids 627K or 627E/701N. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000252. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhou B, Li Y, Halpin R, Hine E, Spiro DJ, Wentworth DE. 2011. PB2 residue 158 is a pathogenic determinant of pandemic H1N1 and H5 influenza a viruses in mice. J Virol 85:357–365. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01694-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bussey KA, Bousse TL, Desmet EA, Kim B, Takimoto T. 2010. PB2 residue 271 plays a key role in enhanced polymerase activity of influenza A viruses in mammalian host cells. J Virol 84:4395–4406. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02642-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yamada S, Hatta M, Staker BL, Watanabe S, Imai M, Shinya K, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Ito M, Ozawa M, Watanabe T, Sakabe S, Li C, Kim JH, Myler PJ, Phan I, Raymond A, Smith E, Stacy R, Nidom CA, Lank SM, Wiseman RW, Bimber BN, O'Connor DH, Neumann G, Stewart LJ, Kawaoka Y. 2010. Biological and structural characterization of a host-adapting amino acid in influenza virus. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001034. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhu W, Zhu Y, Qin K, Yu Z, Gao R, Yu H, Zhou J, Shu Y. 2012. Mutations in polymerase genes enhanced the virulence of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in mice. PLoS One 7:e33383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhao Z, Yi C, Zhao L, Wang S, Zhou L, Hu Y, Zou W, Chen H, Jin M. 2014. PB2-588I enhances 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus virulence by increasing viral replication and exacerbating PB2 inhibition of beta interferon expression. J Virol 88:2260–2267. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03024-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fan S, Hatta M, Kim JH, Halfmann P, Imai M, Macken CA, Le MQ, Nguyen T, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. 2014. Novel residues in avian influenza virus PB2 protein affect virulence in mammalian hosts. Nat Commun 5:5021. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gao W, Zu Z, Liu J, Song J, Wang X, Wang C, Liu L, Tong Q, Wang M, Sun H, Sun Y, Liu J, Chang K, Pu J. 2019. Prevailing I292V PB2 mutation in avian influenza H9N2 virus increases viral polymerase function and attenuates IFN-β induction in human cells. J Gen Virol 100:1273–1281. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu Y, Qin K, Meng G, Zhang J, Zhou J, Zhao G, Luo M, Zheng X. 2013. Structural and functional characterization of K339T substitution identified in the PB2 subunit cap-binding pocket of influenza A virus. J Biol Chem 288:11013–11023. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.392878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yamaji R, Yamada S, Le MQ, Li C, Chen H, Qurnianingsih E, Nidom CA, Ito M, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Kawaoka Y. 2015. Identification of PB2 mutations responsible for the efficient replication of H5N1 influenza viruses in human lung epithelial cells. J Virol 89:3947–3956. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03328-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoffmann E, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y, Hobom G, Webster RG. 2000. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6108–6113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100133697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Reed L, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg 27:493–497. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Su C-Y, Cheng T-J, Lin M-I, Wang S-Y, Huang W-I, Lin-Chu S-Y, Chen Y-H, Wu C-Y, Lai MM, Cheng W-C, Wu Y-T, Tsai M-D, Cheng Y-S, Wong C-H. 2010. High-throughput identification of compounds targeting influenza RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19151–19156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013592107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The eight gene segments of the isolates were sequenced and have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN393701 to MN393876.


Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES