Skip to main content
International Journal of Pediatrics logoLink to International Journal of Pediatrics
. 2020 Mar 20;2020:8431953. doi: 10.1155/2020/8431953

Cessation of Exclusive Breastfeeding and Determining Factors at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

Bayew Kelkay 1,, Eshetie Kindalem 1, Animut Tagele 1, Yohannes Moges 2
PMCID: PMC7109560  PMID: 32256615

Abstract

Background

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is the gold standard of infant feeding practice which lasts up to 6 months postpartum. Not all infants are exclusively breastfed in developing countries, including Ethiopia. This study, therefore, assessed the magnitude and determining factors of EBF cessation practice among mothers at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Method

Institutional-based cross-sectional study design using a systematic random sampling technique was applied to select 344 mothers of infants aged 9 months came for measles vaccination. Pretested structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Independent variables with a P value of <0.05 indicated association.

Result

The magnitude of cessation of EBF was 21.5% with 95% CI (17.24-25.76). Maternal age ≤ 19 years [AOR = 5.53; 95% CI (1.07-28.57)], civil servants [AOR = 4.73; 95% CI (2.20-10.19)], illiterate husbands [AOR = 3.76; 95% CI (1.13-12.49)], primi-para [AOR = 2.42; 95% CI (1.22-4.79)], no postnatal follow up [AOR = 2.62; 95% CI (1.44-4.80)], and having poor knowledge on breastfeeding benefits and composition of breastmilk [AOR = 3.15; 95% CI (1.56-6.35)] were independent factors significantly associated with cessation of EBF. Conclusion and recommendation. The magnitude of cessation of EBF was high. Maternal age, parity, employment status, postnatal follow-up, and breastfeeding knowledge as well as spouse literacy level were independent factors significantly associated with cessation of EBF. Our study provides further impetus for empowering young and primi-para with breastfeeding knowledge, an extension of maternity leave time, and support for breastfeeding at the workplace.

1. Introduction

Breast milk is natural and renewable food that is environmentally sound, produced, and delivered to consumers without pollution, unnecessary packaging, or waste [1]. Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended up to 6 months of age with continued breastfeeding along with complementary foods up to two years of age or beyond [2].

Globally, only 37% of children younger than 6 months are exclusively breastfed [3] and increase with an annual rate of 2.4% [4]. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization (WHO) are the two leading global breastfeeding initiatives to raise the rate of EBF in the first 6 months at least 50% by 2025 [3]. Early introduction of foods and liquids before 6 months of age (cessation of EBF) is common practice in all low and middle-income countries [5] and much room for improvement of EBF practice [6]. An increasing rate of breastfeeding could save the lives of more than 820,000 children under the age of 5 years [3]. There is no better substitute for breast milk, and a breastfed child is 14 times less likely to die in the first 6 months than a nonbreastfed child [7]. Promoting EBF for 6 months significantly reduces the respiratory and gastrointestinal morbidities of infants [8]. High mortality-related diarrheal disease is common in sub-Saharan countries, and early initiation of EBF reduces the risk [9]. Cessation of EBF increases the risk of pneumonia morbidity and related death [10], excessive diarrhea [11], and low growth rate [12] compared to exclusively breastfed infants. Another study conducted in Bangladesh proves that nonexclusive breastfeeding infants for the first 6 months may suffer from infectious diseases and undernutrition [13]. Children have also encountered vomiting, allergic reaction, and diarrhea immediately following the weaning process [14]. The study conducted in Northern Ethiopia showed that EBF is the strongest predictor of infant survival and which is a cost-effective, feasible, and safe strategy to reduce infant mortality [15]. EBF has also great benefits for maternal health outcomes like reducing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer, type two diabetes, postpartum depression, and have a long duration of amenorrhea or as a natural family planning method [16]. Studies showed that factors like younger mothers [1719], low level of educational status [1821], mothers who smoke [17, 18], low parity [19, 2123], employed mothers [24, 25], breast problem (cracked nipple) [23], initiate of breastfeeding after one hour and had no antenatal care (ANC) visits [26], had no postnatal care (PNC) visits [26, 27], and cesarean delivery [25, 28] are some of the independent factors that push mothers to give up exclusive EBF.

Generally, increasing the practice of EBF is a fundamental driver to achieve sustainable development goals by 2030 [1]. The practice in Ethiopia is significantly lower than the global recommendation [29]. Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital is a teaching hospital that provides multiple health care services for a load of referral clients and directly comes there. However, there is limited data regarding the burden of cessation of EBF and associated factors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the magnitude of exclusive breastfeeding cessation and to identify associated factors including knowledge-related factors that were not assessed in previous studies among mothers of infants who came for measles vaccination for their respective infant at 9 months of age.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Setting and Design

The institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from February 10 to May 15, 2019, at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, expanded program for immunization (EPI) room. This hospital is located in the Central Gondar administrative zone, Amhara National Regional State, which is far from about 750 km Northwest of Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia). According to the 2007 population and housing census report, the total population size of Gondar town was estimated to be 206,987. University of Gondar Specialized Hospital is a teaching hospital that serves more than five million people of the central Gondar zone and peoples of the neighboring zones. This hospital provided a measles vaccine for 210 infants at the age of nine months monthly, and annually 2550 infants received this immunization.

2.2. Study Population and Sampling Procedure

The study populations were mothers having children of 9 months age and came to vaccinate their children for measles at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital during a data collection period. Any mothers other than biological mothers who brought the infants for immunization were excluded in this study. Single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size with the assumption of 69.63% proportion of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding before six months from the previous study in Ankesha Guagusa Woreda, AwiZone [25], 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error. After adding a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample size was 358 mothers. Study participants were selected by using a systematic sampling method with a sampling interval (K) of two. The first mother was selected by the lottery method and continued with intervals of two until the desired sample participants achieved among mothers who came for measles vaccination at the time of data collection.

2.3. Variable

2.3.1. Dependent Variable

Cessation of exclusive breastfeeding.

2.3.2. Independent Variables

Socio-demographic-related variables: maternal age, religion, marital status, maternal education level, maternal occupation, and paternal education level. Obstetric and gynecological-related factors: parity, antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, number of visits, counseled about breastfeeding during ANC, place of delivery, mode of delivery, number of baby(ies), infant(s) sex, wanted baby(ies), early initiation of breastfeeding in 1st one hour, breast problems after the most recent birth (cracked nipple, engorgement, abscess, or mastitis after birth), postnatal care (PNC) follow-up, and advised about exclusive breastfeeding during PNC follow-up. Knowledge of mothers regarding composition and benefits of breast milk-related variables: breast milk gives immunity to the baby, breast gives enough water for the baby, breast milk helps brain development of the baby, breastfed babies gain weight, breastfeeding is the most effective way to protect baby from diarrheal diseases, breastfeeding might be protecting mothers from breast cancer, exclusive breastfeeding helps the mother on not getting pregnant too early, breastfeeding affects mothers health badly, breastfeeding helps to build up a good bond between mother and baby, and formula milk has better benefits than breast milk. Personal and breastfeeding practice-related factors: partner support for the mother, family member influence to give feeds other than breast milk, and prior experience of exclusive breastfeeding.

2.4. Measurement

The data was collected using a structured questionnaire that was adapted from similar published studies with minor modifications. Initially, questionnaires are prepared by the English language, then translated to the local language (Amharic), and finally back to the English version to check its consistency. Three midwives who had a BSc degree were involved in data collection. All data collectors were oriented and well-informed about the data collection process. A pretest was done in 5% (18 mothers) of the total sample size out of the selected study population (at Addis Zemen primary hospital) to ensure the quality, clarity, understandability, and completeness of the questioner. Based on pretest input, a modification was employed on logical sequence and clarity of the questionnaire.

To gather information on cessation of EBF (fully formula feeding or partial breastfeeding) for the first 6 months was assessed by using the dietary recall method. Study participants were asked by “Did you give any solid or liquid other than breastmilk, vitamin, syrup and/or medication to the child during the first six months of age?” The mothers who had been provided considered as “yes” or ceased EBF and coded as “1” in regression analysis and those who had not considered as “No” and coded “0.”

Finally, the data were coded, entered, and analyzed by statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 20.0. The result was presented by frequency and percent. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were carried out to determine independent variables associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding. All variables with a P value of less than 0.2 in the bivariate logistic regression model were included in multivariate logistic regression, and variables with P value less than 0.05 were considered as significantly associated independent factors.

2.5. Operational Definition

Cessation of exclusive breastfeeding: The report that the mother introduces any liquid (like formula milk, water, or/and juice) or solids (like infant cereal) except drops or syrups consisting of vitamins, mineral supplements, or medications for her infant aged less than six months [25].

Good and poor knowledge: Mothers who gave a minimum of 5 out of 10 or 50% correct answer of knowledge-related questions are considered as mothers that had good knowledge, if not, considered as having poor knowledge [30].

2.6. Ethical Considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review board committee of the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science and School of Midwifery. A supportive letter was given for the University of Gondar referral hospital immunization room staff to get permission. After the purpose and objective of the study informed, written consent was obtained from each study participant. Participation was entirely voluntary and mothers were informed about the right to withdraw from the study at any time of the interview. The participants were also assured that the data was confidential.

3. Results

3.1. Socio-Demographic-Related Characteristics of Respondents

In this study, a total of 344 mothers have participated with a response rate of 99.04%. The mean (±SD) age of the mothers was 26.41 (±4.312) years with a minimum and maximum of 18 and 40 years, respectively. Almost all (99.4%) were married and majorities (87.2%) were orthodox religious followers. Nearly, three fourth (74.1%) of the respondents were with the age range of 20–29 years. More than half (53.5%) of the mothers were housewives by occupation, and 147 (42.7%) participants completed college and above by their educational background. Three hundred eighteen (92.4%) came from urban areas. More than half (54.4%) and 161 (46.8%) mothers' partners have completed college education and had paid jobs, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents at University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 344).

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Maternal age in years <20 11 3.2
20–29 255 74.1
≥30 78 22.7

Religion Orthodox 300 87.2
Muslim 37 10.8
Protestant 7 2.0

Educational status No education 32 9.3
Primary 70 20.3
Secondary 95 27.6
College and above 147 42.7

Marital status Married 342 99.4
Widowed 1 0.3
Divorced 1 0.3

Maternal occupation Housewife 184 53.5
Merchant 32 9.3
Civil servant 109 31.7
Private sector 19 5.5

Occupation of the partner Farmer 31 9.0
Paid job 161 46.8
Student 6 1.7
Merchant 99 28.8
Others 47 13.7

Educational status of the partner No education 22 6.4
Primary 50 14.5
Secondary 85 24.7
College and above 187 54.4

Place of residence Rural 26 7.6
Urban 318 92.4

3.2. Obstetrics and Gynecology-Related Factors

Half (50.9%) of the respondents gave birth to a viable fetus once (primi-para). Almost all (97.4%) mothers attended ANC follow-up. From those respondents who had ANC follow-up, 292 (87.2%) and 149 (44.5%) of them had ≥4 visits and received counseling on infant feeding during the follow-up, respectively. Only 14 (4.1%) mothers gave birth at home. More than half (57.6%) of the mothers gave birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery, and 96.2% of babies were wanted. One third (33.4%) of the mothers had no PNC follow-up (Table 2).

Table 2.

Obstetrical and gynecological-related factors of respondents at University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 344).

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Parity Primi-para 175 50.9
Multi-para 169 49.1

ANC follow-up Yes 335 97.4
No 9 2.6

Number of ANC visits (n = 335) <4 43 12.8
≥4 292 87.2

Counsel on infant feeding during ANC follow-up (n = 335) Yes 149 44.5
No 186 55.5

Place of birth Home 14 4.1
Health center 21 6.1
Hospital 309 89.8

Mode of delivery SVD 198 57.6
Instrumental 72 20.9
C/S 74 21.5

Number of babies delivered Singleton 337 98.0
Multiple 7 2.0

Sex of the baby Male 171 49.7
Female 167 48.6
Male and female 6 1.7

Baby wanted Yes 331 96.2
No 13 3.8

Breastfeeding within one hour of birth Yes 285 82.8
No 59 17.2

Breast problems (cracked nipple, engorgement, abscess, or mastitis) after delivery Yes 48 14.0
No 296 86.0

PNC follow-up Yes 229 66.6
No 115 33.4

Counsel about EBF during PNC follow-up (n = 229) Yes 130 56.8
No 99 43.2

3.3. Knowledge of Mothers on the Composition and Benefits of Breast Milk

Nearly one fifth, or 17.2% and 23.3%, of mothers did not know that breast milk has antibodies and breast milk is the most effective way to prevent babies from diarrheal disease, respectively. One third (32.6%) of the respondents believed that breast milk had no enough water for the baby. Half (51.7%) of the respondents knew breastfeeding protects mothers from acquiring breast cancer, and 119 (34.6%) respondents believed that formula milk has better benefits than breast milk. Generally from the total participants, 284 (82.6%) of those respondents had good knowledge or gave the correct answer of ≥5 out of 10 knowledge-related questions about the composition and benefits of breast milk assessment questions (Table 3).

Table 3.

Knowledge of mothers on compositions and benefits of breast milk at University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 344).

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Breast milk gives immunity to the body Yes 285 82.8
No 59 17.2

Breast milk gives enough water to the baby Yes 232 67.4
No 112 32.6

Breast milk helps brain development of the baby Yes 289 84.0
No 55 16.0

Breastfeed baby gains weight Yes 292 84.9
No 51 14.8
I do not know 1 0.3

Breastfeeding is the most effective way to prevent baby from diarrheal diseases Yes 264 76.7
No 80 23.3

Breastfeed might protect mother from breast cancer Yes 178 51.7
No 145 42.2
I do not know 21 6.1

EBF helps the mother not to get pregnant early True 214 62.2
False 130 37.8

Breastfeeding helps to build up bonding between mother and baby True 306 89.0
False 38 11.0

Formula milk has better benefits than breast milk True 119 34.6
False 225 65.4

Breastfeeding affects maternal health badly True 102 29.7
False 242 70.3

3.4. Personal and Breastfeeding Practice-Related Factors

More than three fourth of the participants (90.1%) were supported by their partner at home and 26 (7.6%) participants were influenced by their family members to give complementary feeding than EBF up to 6 months. Thirty-seven (10.8%) had prior experience of exclusive breastfeeding. Primi-para mothers had no prior experience. From a total of 74 (21.7%) mothers who had cessation-exclusive breastfeeding, nearly half (44.6%) mothers discontinued within 1–3 months of infant age (Table 4).

Table 4.

Personal and breastfeeding practice-related factors of respondents at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 344).

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Does your partner support you at home? Yes 310 90.1
No 34 9.9

Family members influenced to give complementary feeding than EBF up to 6 months No 318 92.4
Yes 26 7.6

Prior exclusive breastfeeding experience (Para 1 response considered as “no”) No 307 89.2
Yes 37 10.8

The month when the mother initiated a fluid/solid diet before 6 months (n = 74) Within 1 month 13 17.6
1-3 months 33 44.6
≥4 months 28 37.8

3.5. Magnitude and Reasons for Cessation of EBF

Seventy-four (21.5%) mothers were discontinued EBF before 6 months. The mean month to discontinue EBF was 2.49 with a standard deviation of ±1.73 months. From the total of 74 mothers who had cessation EBF, 27 (36.5%) mothers replied “return to work” as a reason (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Reasons why mothers started any kind of fluid or/and solid diet for their infant before 6 months of age at University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 74).

3.6. Factors Associated with Cessation of Exclusive Breastfeeding

In bivariate logistic regression model ten variables like age ≤ 19 years, civil servant by occupation, illiterate husbands (not writing or reading), being primi-para, gave birth assisted by instruments, gave birth at health center, had no PNC follow up, did not initiate breastfeeding early (within 1 hour), breast-related problem after birth, and had poor knowledge on benefits and compositions of breast milk were variables associated with cessation of EBF with P value <0.2. After adjusting possible confounders, age ≤ 19 years, a civil servant by occupation, illiterate (not writing or reading), being primi-para, had no PNC follow-up, and had poor knowledge on benefits and compositions of breast milk were found to have a statistically significant association with the cessation of EBF (Table 5).

Table 5.

Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 344).

Variable Category Cessation of EBF COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
No Yes
Age in years ≤19 5(45.5%) 6 (54.5%) 4.65 [1.26-17.2] 5.53 [1.07-28.57]
20-29 203 (79.6%) 52 (20.4%)
≥30 62 (79.5%) 16 (20.5%) 1.00 1.00

Maternal occupation Housewife 155 (84.2%) 29 (15.8%) 1.00 1.00
Merchant 27 (84.4%) 5 (15.6%)
Civil servant 74 (67.9%) 35 (32.1%) 2.52 [1.44-4.45] 4.73 [2.20-10.19]
Private sector 14 (73.7%) 5 (26.3%)

Paternal level of education No education 14 (63.6%) 8 (36.4%) 2.24 [0.88-5.73] 3.76 [1.13-12.49]
Primary 44 (88.0%) 6 (12.0%) 0.53 [0.21-1.34] 0.76 [0.25-2.38]
Secondary 63 (74.1) 22 (25.9%)
College and above 149 (79.7) 38 (20.3%) 1.00

Parity Primi-para 125 (71.4%) 50 (28.6%) 2.41 [1.41-4.16] 2.42 [1.22-4.79]
Multipara 145 (85.8%) 24 (14.2%) 1.00

Place of birth Home 10 (71.4%) 4 (28.6%)
Health center 14 (66.7%) 7 (33.3%) 1.95 [0.76-5.04] 1.55 [0.51-4.75]
Hospital 246 (79.%) 63 (20.4%) 1.00

Mode of delivery SVD 165 (83.3%) 33 (16.7%) 1.00
IAVD 48 (66.7%) 24 (33.3%) 2.50 [1.35-4.63] 2.01 [0.97-4.19]
C/S 57 (77.0) 17 (23.0%)

Early initiation of BF Yes 23 (81.1%) 54 (18.9%) 1.00
No 39 (66.1%) 20 (33.9%) 2.19 [1.19-4.06] 1.62 [0.72-3.63]

Breast related problem Yes 32 (66.7%) 16 (33.3%) 2.05 [1.06-3.99] 2.17 [0.99-4.74]
No 238 (80.4%) 58 (19.6%) 1.00

PNC Yes 192 (83.8) 37 (16.2%) 2 1.00
No 78 (67.8%) 37 (32.2%) 2.46 [1.45-4.17] 2.62 [1.44-4.80]

BF affect maternal health badly False 196 (72.6%) 46 (62.2%) 1.00
True 74 (27.4%) 28 (37.8%) 1.61 [0.93-2.77] 1.2 [0.65-2.20]

FM better benefits than BM False 183 (67.8%) 42 (56.8%) 1.00
True 87 (32.2%) 32 (43.2%) 1.60 [0.95-2.71] 1.31 [0.75-2.28]

BF prevents from diarrheal diseases True 215 (79.6%) 49 (66.2%) 1.00
False 55 (20.4%) 25 (33.8%) 1.99 [1.13-3.51] 1.63 [0.89-2.97]

Breast milk gives enough water True 192 (71.1%) 40 (54.1%) 1.00
False 78 (28.9%) 34 (45.9%) 2.09 [1.26-3.55] 2.19 [1.26-3.74]

Knowledge of benefit and compositions of BF Good 233 (82.0%) 51 (18.0%) 1.00
Poor 37 (61.7%) 23 (38.3%) 2.84 [1.55-5.19] 3.15 [1.56-6.35]

Significantly associated variables with P value < 0.05 and 1.00 represent reference variable. FM: formula feeding; BF: breastfeeding; PNC: postnatal care; SVD: spontaneous vaginal delivery; IAVD: instrumental assisted vaginal delivery; C/S: cesarean section; EBF: exclusive breastfeeding.

4. Discussion

4.1. Cessation of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice

The magnitude of cessation of EBF was found to be 21.5% (n = 74) with 95% CI (17.24-25.76). The magnitude in this study was in line with the study conducted in India (22.85%) [28] and slightly lower than Southeast Ethiopia (28.7%) [24], Tigray (29.8%) [27], and Canada (28.4%) [31]. This slight difference could be t these studies were community-based and conducted before four years of this study and the study conducted in Canada was longitudinal. However, the magnitude of cessation of EBF was lower than what had been reported in Australia (38%) [17], Brazil (39.7%) [23], and Sri Lanka (49.2%) [30]. The disparities might be due to study design, level of understanding regarding the studies and telling reliable data, and have good additional feeding style since the above countries are in the high and middle-income economic category.

The study conducted in Malaysia (45.6%) [32], Taiwan (70.7%) [21], Democratic Republic of Congo (97.2%) [33], Sorro district, South Ethiopia (49.4%) [26], and AnkeshaGuagusa Woreda (69.63%) [25] were also having a high prevalence rate of cessation of EBF compared to this study. The dissimilarities could be due to the studies conducted other than Taiwan were community-based which is more representative and used mixed (both qualitative and quantitative) method, socio-cultural difference, and study setting. The study in Taiwan had used a large sample size, and a wide range of study periods could be the reason for the difference.

4.2. Determinant Factors with the Cessation of Exclusive Breastfeeding

Independent factors that were statistically associated with cessation of EBF included parity, maternal occupation, maternal age, paternal level education, PNC, and knowledge on benefits and composition of EBF.

Younger women (age ≤ 19 years) were 5.53 times at higher odds to discontinue EBF before 6 months of infant age than mothers age ≥30 years. This is consistent with the finding of Canada [18, 31], Australia [17], Bangladesh [19], North Ethiopia [27], and Northwest Ethiopia [25]. This could be explained as younger women possibly have a low level of understanding about EBF and the consequence of discontinuing breastfeeding on their infants. Additionally, most mothers believe that breastfeeding might hurt their breast shape (need to have the same shape as a nonpregnant state).

Mothers who had been civil servants (employed) by occupation were 4.73 times more likely to cessation EBF compared to those housewife mothers. This is supported by the study conducted in Canada [18], Sri Lanka [30], Bangladesh [19], Taiwan [21], Goba district, Southeast Ethiopia [24], and Northwest Ethiopia [25]. This could be because civil servant mothers may return to the workplace before 6 months of infant age and perceive their infant starved. Then, they will have a high likelihood of start other fluids or diets. Mothers who had illiterate (no educational background) partner was 3.76 times more likely to stop EBF compared to those partners who had an educational status of college and above. No studies support this finding. But, the study conducted in Northwest Ethiopia [25] revealed that partner educational status of college and above were 70% more likely to discontinue compared to none educated. The reason could be the study conducted in Northwest Ethiopia was community-based and in the rural area. Therefore, cutural and traditional thoughts may affect more despite husbands' high level of educational background. Husbands who had low educational background obviously will never involve in infant care and have poor knowledge of recommended infant feeding in the first 6 months.

Like many other previous studies, the odds of cessation of EBF among primi-para mothers were 2.42 times higher than their counterparts. The finding was similar to the study conducted in England [22], Bangladesh [19], Taiwan [21], and northwest Ethiopia [25]. The reason explained that primi-para mothers had no prior experience of breastfeeding and may not realize how much breast milk for the first 6 months is best of breastfeeding. Women who had no postnatal care (PNC) visits were 2.62 times more likely to discontinue EBF before 6 months compared to women who had PNC visits. This is in agreement with the study conducted in South Ethiopia [26], North Ethiopia [27], and Northwest Ethiopia [25]. The explanation could be that mothers who had PNC follow-up received information from health care providers on duration, frequency, compositions, and benefits of EBF.

Mothers who had no good knowledge (not knowledgeable) were 3.15 times more likely to cessation EBF compared to their counterparts. The study conducted in the Democratic Republic Congo [33] agreed with this finding. This might be explained because mothers who had good knowledge about the compositions and benefits of breast milk would have good practice rate of EBF.

4.3. Limitation

This study has some limitations. Cessation of EBF is better to be assessed by asking about "the last 24 hour dietary practice preceding the interview" or through longitudinal follow-up approach. However, due to time and financial constraints, cessation of EBF was assessed through client self-reporting question retrospectively about the entire 6 months of age feeding practice which was challenging to recall cessation of exclusive breastfeeding or not. To minimize this effect, we tried to encourage mothers correlated to different events like “baptism” or “Christina” in Amharic for those orthodox Christian followers to remember when they initiated other than breastmilk in the month instead of in date to remember easily. Since the study design was cross-sectional, it is not possible to establish a true cause and effect relationship. Participants were selected among mothers who came for measles immunization of their infants at 9 months of age, which might not be representative of women who did not come for immunization was the last but not the least limitation of this study.

4.4. Conclusion

The magnitude of the cessation of exclusive breastfeeding was high. Factors determining EBF cessation were maternal age, civil servant, parity, postnatal visits, and breastfeeding knowledge, as well as spouse literacy. Critical to minimizing EBF cessation are increasing awareness on breastfeeding, improving postnatal follow-ups (up to community level), extending maternal leave (e.g., for up to 6 months), and supporting breastfeeding at the workplace.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, data collectors, and study participants.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

ANC:

Antenatal care

COR:

Crude odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

EBF:

Exclusive breastfeeding

PNC:

Postnatal care.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review board committee of the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science and School of Midwifery. A formal letter of cooperation was obtained from the concerned body. Written consent was obtained from each respondent. The confidentiality of information was kept.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' Contributions

BK participated in the initiation of the study, proposal writing, data analysis, and writing up of the manuscript. EK is involved in proposal writing and data collection supervision. AT and YM participated in proposal and manuscript reviewing, data entry, and data analysis. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lancet; breastfeeding in the 21st century. https://www.thelancet.com/series/breastfeeding.
  • 2.WHO on Breastfeeding 2019. https://www.who.int/topics/breastfeeding/en/
  • 3.UNICEF and WHO. Breastfeeding Advocacy Initiative May 2016. https://www.unicef.org/nutrition.
  • 4.WHO. WHO Global nutrition targets 2025: breastfeeding policy brief. Geneva: (WHO/NMH/NHD/14.7); 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.MCSP Nutrition Brief. Addressing barriers to exclusive breastfeeding: evidence and program considerations for Low- and Middle-Income Countries. USAID; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cai X., Wardlaw T., Brown D. W. Global trends in exclusive breastfeeding. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2012;7(1) doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.UNICEF Ethiopia. Breastfeeding Gives Children the Best Start in Life: Key for Sustainable Development. 2016. https://unicefethiopia.org/tag/breast-feeding/
  • 8.Duijts L., Jaddoe V. W. V., Hofman A., Moll H. A. Prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of infectious diseases in infancy. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e18–e25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ogbo F. A., Agho K., Ogeleka P., et al. Infant feeding practices and diarrhoea in sub-Saharan African countries with high diarrhoea mortality. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):p. e0171792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lamberti L. M., Zakarija-Grković I., Fischer Walker C. L., et al. Breastfeeding for reducing the risk of pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children under two: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13, article S18(Supplement 3) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lamberti L. M., Fischer Walker C. L., Noiman A., Victora C., Black R. E. Breastfeeding and the risk for diarrhea morbidity and mortality. BMC Public Health. 2011;11, article S15(Supplement 3) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Diallo F. B., Bell L., Moutquin J. M., Garant M. P. The effects of exclusive versus non-exclusive breastfeeding on specific infant morbidities in Conakry. Pan African Medical Journal. 2010;2(1) doi: 10.4314/pamj.v2i1.51704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan M. N., Islam M. M. Effect of exclusive breastfeeding on selected adverse health and nutritional outcomes: a nationally representative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):p. 889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4913-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Motee A., Jeewon R. Importance of exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding among infants. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal. 2014;2(2):56–72. doi: 10.12944/crnfsj.2.2.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Biks G. A., Berhane Y., Worku A., Gete Y. K. Exclusive breast feeding is the strongest predictor of infant survival in Northwest Ethiopia: a longitudinal study. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2015;34(1) doi: 10.1186/s41043-015-0007-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chowdhury R., Sinha B., Sankar M. J., et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Pædiatrica. 2015;104(467):96–113. doi: 10.1111/apa.13102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ogbo F. A., Eastwood J., Page A., et al. Prevalence and determinants of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the early postnatal period in Sydney, Australia. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2017;12(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-017-0110-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Atchibri L. A., Dako E. Factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding before six months among mothers in the Miramichi region (Canada) IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2017;6(1):69–74. doi: 10.9790/1959-0601046974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Akter S., Rahman M. The Determinants of early cessation of Breastfeeding in Bangladesh. World Health & Population. 2010;11(4):5–12. doi: 10.12927/whp.2010.21722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chandrika P., Bhakhri B. K., Gathwala G., Narwal V., Chaturvedi A. Breast feeding discontinuation among high risk newborns. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(6) doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11570.5999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang P.-C., Li S.-F., Yang H.-Y., et al. Factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at 1 and 2 months postpartum in Taiwan. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2019;14(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0213-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Agboado G., Michel E., Jackson E., Verma A. Factors associated with breastfeeding cessation in nursing mothers in a peer support programme in Eastern Lancashire. BMC Pediatrics. 2010;10(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vieira G. O., Martins C. D. C., Vieira T. D. O., de Oliveira N. F., Silva L. R. Factors predicting breastfeeding discontinuation. Journal de Pediatria. 2010;86(5) doi: 10.2223/JPED.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Setegn T., Belachew T., Gerbaba M., Deribe K., Deribew A., Biadgilign S. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in Goba district, south east Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2012;7(1) doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-7-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yeneabat T., Belachew T., Haile M. Determinants of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in Ankesha Guagusa Woreda, Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tadesse T., Mesfin F., Chane T. Prevalence and associated factors of nonexclusive breastfeeding of infants during the first six months in rural area of Sorro District, Southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2016;11(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-016-0085-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Teka B., Assefa H., Haileslassie K. Prevalence and determinant factors of exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in Enderta Woreda, Tigray, North Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2015;10(1):p. 2. doi: 10.1186/s13006-014-0028-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mohite R. V., Kshirsagar V. Y., Mohite V. R. Prevalence and determinants of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding among primi-Para rural Indian mothers. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2018;6(1):314–319. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20185265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alebel A., Tesma C., Temesgen B., Ferede A., Kibret G. D. Exclusive breastfeeding practice in Ethiopia and its association with antenatal care and institutional delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2018;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0173-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ratnayake H. E., Rowel D. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and barriers for its continuation up to six months in Kandy district, Sri Lanka. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2018;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0180-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kehler H. L., Chaput K. H., Tough S. C. Risk factors for cessation of breastfeeding prior to six months postpartum among a community sample of women in Calgary, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2009;100(5):376–380. doi: 10.1007/bf03405274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tengku Alina T. I., Wan Manan W. M., Mohd Isa B. Factors predicting early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding among women in Kelantan, Malaysia. Health and the Environment Journal. 2013;4(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Babakazo P., Donnen P., Akilimali P., Ali N. M. M., Okitolonda E. Predictors of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before six months among mothers in Kinshasa: a prospective study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2015;10(1) doi: 10.1186/s13006-015-0044-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from International Journal of Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES