Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2014 Jan 3;46(2):119–127. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt134

Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1 interacts with fragile X-related protein 1

Yun Ma 1, Changbo Wang 1, Binyuan Li 1, Lingxue Qin 1, Jiao Su 1, Manjun Yang 1, Shuya He 1,*
PMCID: PMC7109863  PMID: 24389646

Abstract

The absence of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) causes fragile X syndrome (FXS), which is the leading cause of hereditary mental retardation. Fragile X-related protein 1 (FXR1P), which plays an important role in normal muscle development, is one of the two autosomal paralogs of FMRP. To understand the functions of FXR1P, we screened FXR1P-interacting proteins by using a yeast two-hybrid system. The fragile X-related gene 1 (FXR1) was fused to pGBKT7 and then used as the bait to screen the human fetal brain cDNA library. The screening results revealed 10 FXR1P-interacting proteins including Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1 (BTF). The interaction between FXR1P and BTF was confirmed by using both β-galactosidase assay and growth test in selective media. Co-immunoprecipitation assay in mammalian cells was also carried out to confirm the FXR1P/BTF interaction. Moreover, we confirmed that BTF co-localized with FXR1P in the cytoplasm around the nucleus in rat vascular smooth muscle cells by using confocal fluorescence microscopy. These results provide clues to elucidate the relationship between FXR1P and FXS.

Keywords: fragile X-related protein 1, Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1, protein interaction

Introduction

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an X-linked genetic disease, which is the leading cause of inherited intellectual disability. It was first described by Martin and Bell [1]. It was reported that FXS affects ∼1 in 2000 men and 1 in 4000 women [2] and 2.8% of the Chinese mental retardation (MR) population screened by DNA analysis had the fragile X full mutation [3]. FXS is caused by the mutations of the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 (FMR1), which is located on the X chromosome and whose locus at Xq27.3 coincides with the folate-sensitive fragile site [4,5]. The syndrome is characterized by MR, macroorchidism, typical facial appearance, and various degrees of autistic behavior [6]. Fragile X-related gene 1 (FXR1) belongs to the FXR gene family including FMR1 and FXR2, and the sequence of FXR1 is highly conservative [7]. The coding products of FXR1 and FXR2 are fragile X-related protein 1 (FXR1P) and FXR2P, respectively. They share 60% identical amino acids with fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which is encoded by FMR1 [8,9]. These three proteins share the same characteristic functional domains of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), i.e. two KH domains and one RGG box, which bind to a variety of RNAs [10] and associate with the 60S ribosomal subunits [11]. They also have a nuclear localization signal and a nuclear export signal, which suggests that they can shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm [10,12].

FXR1P has seven isoforms [13,14], including one cardiac-specific isoform [15] and three muscle-specific isoforms [14]. FXR1P is essential for postnatal survival. Inactivation of FXR1P in mice leads to impaired myogenesis and finally causes the death of neonates shortly after birth, which most probably is due to an abnormal development of the myocardiac or respiratory muscle [14]. In Xenopus, reduction of FXR1P disrupted the rotation and segmentation of somitic myotomal cell and hindered normal myogenesis [16]. In zebrafish, knockdown of FXR1 caused abnormalities in striated muscle and severe cardiomyopathy and led to heart failure in the embryos [17]. Finally, in humans, altered expression of muscle-specific isoforms of FXR1P had been implicated in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. These patients had abnormal expression patterns of three different FXR1P muscle-specific isoforms in the myoblasts and the myotubes [18]. In a word, these studies suggested that FXR1P plays important roles in normal muscle development.

FMRP has been identified as the key cause of FXS. Moreover, the high degree of similarity in protein structure and the relationship among members of the FXR family suggests that FXR1P and FXR2P may both play important roles in the pathogenesis of FXS. However, the function of FXR1P and FXR2P in FXS is far from clear. To gain further insights into the function of these proteins, we aim to identify novel interacting proteins of FXR1P. In this study, we used the full coding sequence of human FXR1P as the bait in a yeast two-hybrid system. Because FXR1P is expressed in fetal brain [19], we chose a human fetal brain cDNA library for screening the FXR1P-interacting proteins [20] and identified novel FXR1P-interacting proteins that could define the function of FXR1P.

Materials and Methods

Plasmids

The full open reading frame of the human FXR1 (GenBank NC_000003.11) gene was inserted into the pGBKT7 vector [15] to generate recombinant vector pGBKT7-FXR1 (Table 1), which was used as the bait plasmid in yeast two-hybrid screening. In the co-immunoprecipitation assay, the full open reading frame of the human FXR1 gene and human BTF gene were inserted into the pCMV-HA vector [15] and the pCMV-Myc vector [21], respectively, to generate recombinant vector pCMV-HA-FXR1 and pCMV-Myc-BTF (Table 1). Similarly, in the co-localization assay, the full open reading frames of the human FXR1 gene and human BTF gene were inserted into the pEGFP-C1vector [22] and pDsRed-Monomer-N1 vector [23] to generate the expression vector pEGFP-N1-FXR1 and pDsRed-Monomer-N1-BTF (Table 1), respectively.

Table 1.

Plasmids used in this study

Plasmid name Vector Insert (s) Insertion site Primer sequence
pGBKT7-FXR1 pGBKT7 FXR1 EcoRI ctagaattcatggcggacgtgacggtgctagaattcttatgaaacaccattc
pCMV-HA-FXR1 pCMV-HA FXR1 EcoRI, XhoI tatgaattcggatggcggagctgacggtggaggcgctcgagttatgaaacaccat tcaggac
pCMV-Myc-BTF pCMV-Myc BTF SalI, NotI gtcgaccatgggtcgctccaattctattctttcagaatttttgtcttcaaaagttttgctactgc atctcacgcggccgcttattccttttcttccttgc
pEGFP-N1-FXR1 pEGFP-N1 FXR1 XhoI, HindIII tatctcgagggatggcggagctgacgatcaagctttgaaacaccattcaggac
pDsRed-Monomer-N1-BTF pDsRed-Monomer BTF HindIII, KpnI atcaagcttatgggtcgctccaatattctttcagaatttttgtcttcaaaagttttgctactgca tctcacatggtaccttattccttttcttccttgc

Strains and growth conditions

Escherichia coli strains used were DH5α and Top10. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were Y187 and AH109. E. coli was grown in Luria–Bertani medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl, and pH 7.0) at 37°C. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were cultured at 30°C in yeast peptone dextrose medium (2% tryptone, 1% yeast extract, and 2% glucose) or SC medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and 2% glucose) supplemented with amino acid mixture without the indicated amino acids for selection. Rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

Yeast two-hybrid screening

Human Fetal Brain Matchmaker cDNA library (Clontech, Palo Alto, USA) cloned into the vector pGADT7 was used to transfect the yeast strain Y187, and the transfected strain was used for two-hybrid screening [24]. The pGBKT7-FXR1 recombinant plasmid was transfected into the yeast strain AH109, which was then used as the bait to screen the library. All of the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Clontech). The yeast strain AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1 was mated to Y187 pre-transformed with the cDNA library and then cultured for 20 h in yeast peptone dextrose adenine medium with kanamycin to produce diploid zygotes. The transfected products were plated onto the appropriate selective medium SD/Trp/His/Leu, and incubated for 3 days at 30°C. A total of 1 × 108 transformants were plated. The colonies appearing on SD/Trp/His/Leu medium were collected and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. The β-gal filter lift assay was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions (Clontech). Subsequently, the library from the positive colonies (positive growth in SD/Trp/His/Leu medium and positive β-gal activity) were extracted and digested with HindIII. Plasmid fragment sizes were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to segregate the colonies. DNA purified from the positive yeast colonies was used to transfect E. coli Top10. DNA sequence analysis and BLAST were performed at www.pubmed.com.

Retesting the interaction between BTF and FXR1 in the yeast two-hybrid system

The yeast strain Y187 was transfected with plasmids pGADT7-BTF and then plated on SD/Leu medium [25]. The yeast strains Y187-pGADT7-BTF and AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1 were tested for autonomous activation, and none of the constructs showed any self-activation. Subsequently, AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1 was mated to Y187-pGADT7-BTF. The transformants were cultured in yeast peptone dextrose adenine medium for 20 h and then plated onto the appropriate selective medium (SD/Trp/His/Leu). After the colonies appeared on the plates, β-galactosidase assays were performed. The interaction was then confirmed if the colonies showed β-galactosidase activity and grew on the SD/His/Trp/Leu medium [26].

Co-immunoprecipitation assay

VSMCs were grown in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. When the cells reached 80% confluence, they were placed in six-well plates with basal DMEM without fetal calf serum or antibiotics and co-transfected with the mammalian expression plasmids pCMV-HA-FXR1 and pCMV-Myc-BTF by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) [27,28]. The transfected cells were incubated for 5 h, and then the medium was replaced with complete DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. At 48 h, the cells were harvested. Approximately 2 mg of total protein extract was used in each co-immunoprecipitation [29]. The samples were incubated with either 1 μg of anti-Myc or anti-HA antibody, and pulled down with protein A/G agarose for 2 h at 4°C. The relative molecular mass of the proteins was estimated by pre-stained protein markers. The pulled-down proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman, Piscataway, USA). The transfer conditions were 100 V for 1 h at 4°C. Different antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA) were used to detect the corresponding proteins.

Cellular co-localization of FXR1P and BTF

When the confluence of the VSMCs reached 80%, they were placed in six-well plates with DMEM without fetal calf serum and antibiotic. The mammalian expression plasmids pEGFP-N1-FXR1 and pDsRed-Monomer-N1-BTF were, respectively, single-transfected or co-transfected into the VSMCs by Lipofectamine 2000. The transfected cells were incubated for 5 h, and then the medium was replaced with complete DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. The cells were harvested after transfection for about 48 h, then washed twice with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Then, the nucleus was stained with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Beyotime, Nantong, China) for 10 min. A laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe the localization and the co-localization of BTF and FXR1P in the cells.

Results

Ten of the 156 positive colonies containing BTF interacted with FXR1P by yeast two-hybrid system screening

To identify the putative FXR1P-interacted proteins, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening [30]. A yeast expression vector (pGBKT7) containing the full open reading frame of human FXR1 fused to the DNA-binding domain (BD) of the yeast transcription factor Gal4 was used as the bait. A human fetal brain matchmaker cDNA library in the vector pGADT7 was used as prey to transfect the yeast strain Y187. After mating AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1 with Y187-pGADT7-cDNA, we performed selection by SD lacking histidine, tryptophan, and leucine (SD/Trp/His/Leu) medium and β-galactosidase assay. Among the 156 positive colonies grown in the SD/Trp/His/Leu medium, 10 different colonies showed positive results in the β-galactosidase assay (Fig. 1). These 10 colonies were sequenced (Fig. 2) and the results were analyzed by BLAST as the main tool for homology analysis (http://www.nvbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Screening FXR1P-interacting proteins by the yeast two-hybrid system (A) After mating AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1 with Y187-pGADT7-cDNA, we screened with SD lacking histidine, tryptophan, and leucine (SD/Trp/His/Leu) medium and obtained 156 positive colonies. (B) After the colonies appeared on the plates, β-galactosidase assays were performed and we obtained 10 different colonies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sequencing result of the BTF positive colonies The 10 positive colonies were sequenced.

After examining, we found one colony from the colonies that expresses a protein highly identical to human Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1 (BTF) (100% identity) (Table 2), a protein with 921 amino acids.

Table 2.

Bioinformatics analysis result

Clone number Gene name GenBank number Homology
31-2 Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1 (BTF) NM014739.1 100%
34-1 Homo sapiens ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 (FTH1) NM_002032 99%
38 Homo sapiens hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 1 (HSD17B1) NM_000413.1 100%
39-1 Homo sapiens scaffold attachment factor B (SAFB) NM_002967.2 98%
46-2 CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid synthetase (CMAS) NM_018686.3 99%
45-1 Homo sapiens Golgi autoantigen, Golgi subfamily a, 4 (GOLGA4) NM_002078.3 96%
46-1 Chorionic somatomammotropin hormone 1 (CSH1) NM_022640.2 100%
43-2 Homo sapiens zinc finger protein 787 (ZNF787) Non-coding sequence
42-1 Zinc finger, CCHC domain contain 7 Non-coding sequence
33-1 Homo sapiens myosin heavy polypeptide 10 (MYH10) Non-coding sequence

Direct retesting of the interaction between FXR1P and BTF by using a yeast two-hybrid system

To test the ability of BTF to interact with FXR1P, the two library plasmids were used to transfect Y187, and PcL1 as the control vector. Mating was performed between various Y187-pGADT7-cDNA colonies and AH109-pGBKT7-FXR1. The transformants were cultured on the SD/His/Trp/Leu medium. Then, the colonies appeared on the media, and the β-galactosidase assay showed positive results. In addition, no β-galactosidase activity was observed in the yeast strain transformed with only the bait plasmid pGBKT7-FXR1.

FXR1P and BTF have direct interaction in rat VSMCs

To confirm the direct interaction between FXR1P and BTF, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assay in the VSMCs. pCMV-Myc-BTF was co-transferred with pCMV-HA-FXR1 into the VSMCs. The cell extracts from the co-transfected cells were immunoprecipitated with either the polyclonal anti-HA antibody or the anti-Myc antibody and protein A/G agarose, and then detected by immunoblotting. After being precipitated with the anti-HA antibody and the protein A/G agarose, the protein could be detected by the anti-Myc antibody. After being precipitated with the anti-Myc antibody and the protein A/G agarose, the protein could be detected by the anti-HA antibody. In our study, a positive control was obtained by the anti-HA antibody or the anti-Myc antibody. A negative control was obtained by IgG. FXR1P and BTF exhibited positive results (Fig. 3). The results indicated that there was an interaction between FXR1P and BTF in the VSMCs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Co-immunoprecipitation of Myc-BTF and HA-FXR1P FXR1P interacts with BTF in vitro. Rat VSMCs were co-transfected with pCMV-Myc-BTF and pCMV-HA-FXR1. Then, the lysates were incubated with a mouse anti-HA antibody (or a mouse anti-Myc antibody) and the protein A/G-Sepharose beads. The complex was segregate by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Myc (or anti-HA) antibody. The expressions of BTF and FXR1P were detected with anti-Myc and anti-HA antibody, respectively.

BTF and FXR1P co-localized mainly in the cytoplasm around the nucleus

To understand the functional role of FXR1P in the muscle cell, we used VSMCs. A eukaryotic expression vector encoding the full coding sequence of human BTF fused to red fluorescent protein (RFP) and a eukaryotic expression vector encoding the full coding sequence of human FXR1 fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used in the transfection experiments. The RFP or enhanced GFP (EGFP) expressed red or green, respectively, however, the co-expression of RFP and EGFP was yellow. The expression and subcellular distribution of these proteins in the transfected cells were analyzed by laser confocal microscope. It showed that the fusion proteins FXR1P and BTF were located in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4). After co-transfection, the positive signal (yellow) was visible in the cytoplasm, which showed that BTF and FXR1P were co-localized mainly in the cytoplasm around the nucleus in the VSMCs (Fig. 5). In this experiment, the transfection rate of the VSMCs was >90%, and the transfection efficiency is the best when the cell density is about 60%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Subcellular co-localization studies of FXR1P and BTF (A) Left: rat VSMCs were transfected with pEGFP-N1-FXR1. FXR1P (green) is located in the cytoplasm. (B) Left: rat VSMCs were transfected with pDsRed-Monomer-N1-BTF. BTF (red) is located in the cytoplasm. The nuclei were stained by DAPI (middle; panels A and B). All of the samples were visualized by laser confocal microscope 48 h after transfection.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Co-localization studies of FXR1P and BTF pEGFP-N1-FXR1 and pDsRed-Monomer-N1-BTF were co-transfected together into the rat VSMCs. All of the samples were tested after transfection for about 48 h. FXR1P (green) and BTF (red) are visible around the nucleus. Positive signal (yellow) is visible in the cytoplasm. Yellow indicated the co-localization of pEGFP-FXR1P with pDsRed-BTF. The nuclei (blue) were stained by DAPI.

Discussion

FXS is caused by the expansion of a highly polymorphic CGG repeat in the 5′ untranslated region of the FMR1 gene [31] and abnormal methylation of the adjacent CpG island [32]. FMRP, FXR1P, and FXR2P share some similar structure and domains with known function, but their function is not completely known. It has been confirmed that animal models with FMR1 and FXR1/2 knockout showed both similarities and differences in phenotype [18,33]. Thus, whether FXR1P plays roles in the pathogenesis of FXS or other diseases remains unclear.

Protein–protein interactions or protein complexes are integral in nearly all of the cellular processes, ranging from metabolic to structural. Protein–protein interactions are involved in DNA replications and transcriptions, RNA splicing, protein translations and modifications, biological responses, signal transduction, and several other metabolic processes [34]. Finding the interacting partners of a ‘protein of unknown function’ can provide far more insights into the actual function than sequence-based predictions, and can provide a platform for future research. FMRP forms homo- and hetero-multimeter with FXR1P and FXR2P in vitro as well as in vivo [10]. Furthermore, cytoplasmic FMRP interaction protein 2 (CYFIP2) can interact with FMRP as well as FXR1P and FXR2P [35,36].

The yeast two-hybrid system is one of the methods for identifying protein–protein interactions [37]. In the two-hybrid system, two proteins are expressed, respectively, one (a bait protein) fused to the Gal4 DNA BD and the other (a prey protein) fused to the Gal4 transcriptional activation domain. In the Y2HGold yeast strain, activation of the reporters (AUR1-C, ADE2, HIS3, and MEL1) only occurs in a cell containing proteins that interact and bind to the Gal4-responsive promoter [38]. However, the yeast two-hybrid system tends to identify a high proportion of false positives [39]. In this study, we finally obtained 10 different colonies via the yeast two-hybrid system and chose 1 colony named BTF to be further confirmed by the co-immunoprecipitation and the subcellular co-localization experiments.

Immunoprecipitation is a useful method for studying protein–protein interactions [40]. It can isolate the proteins of interest from the cellular extracts via specific antibodies. By using immunoprecipitation assay, we can determine the interaction of the interested proteins via western blot analysis. Interestingly, after co-immunoprecipitation, the result showed that FXR1P and BTF were co-precipitated. Thus, the two proteins either can directly interact or combine to a link factor to form a protein complex. This evidence may confirm the interaction between BTF and FXR1P.

In fluorescence microscopy, co-localization refers to the observation of the spatial overlap between two (or more) different fluorescent labels. Because each label exhibits a separate emission wavelength, it can be used to determine whether the different ‘targets’ are located in the same area of the cells or very near to one another. This definition can be split into two different phenomena: co-occurrence, which refers to the presence of two (possibly unrelated) fluorophores in the same pixel; and correlation, a much more significant statistical relationship between the fluorophores indicative of a biological interaction [41]. This technique is important in many biological and physiological studies trying to demonstrate a relationship between two proteins. In our study, co-localization is used together with co-immunoprecipitation to characterize protein–protein interactions in a true mammalian environment. As FXR1P plays an important role in normal muscle development, and its absence causes muscular abnormalities in mice, frog, and zebrafish, we used rat VSMCs in the subcellular co-localization experiments. We found that BTF and FXR1P were, respectively, located in the cytoplasm in the transfection assays. However, when the cells were co-transfected with BTF and FXR1P, we found the merged signal in the cytoplasm around the nucleus. Since the interaction between the two proteins was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation in vivo, the overlapping staining indicated an interaction between the FXR1P and BTF in mammalian cells, but not co-occurrence. However, evidence showed that the distribution space of BTF and FXR1P can completely overlap with each other in the cells. Thus, this proves indirectly that there is an interaction between these two proteins.

BTF is a death-promoting transcriptional repressor [42] and implicated in DNA damage repair and apoptosis [43]. It was first found in human acute myeloid leukemia cell line KG-1, and it locates on human chromosome 6q22-23 [44]. Although linked to the Bcl-2 family members, BTF does not share structural similarities with these proteins [45]. The most prominent feature of BTF is the presence of an arginine-serine (RS)-rich region located near the N-terminus. RS domain-containing proteins are typically linked with pre-mRNA biogenesis and processing, such as pre-mRNA splicing [46–48]. In 2007, Merz et al. [49] examined the composition of human mRNPs by using LC-MS/MS and discovered the presence of BTF among newly identified mRNP proteins. A subsequent study identified BCLAF1 in hmRNP that mediated cyclin D1 message stability with SNIP1, SkIP, TAP150, and Pinin [50].

The most important role of BTF is to function as a regulator in apoptosis, and the protein is widely expressed in some tissues, such as the brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and so on, acting as an induction factor for apoptosis. Our results suggested that in vivo FXR1P and BTF play a biological role in the forming of a complex or the correlation between them. FXR1 is a housekeeping gene. FXR1P, the protein encoded by FXR1, plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. Moreover, high expression of FXR1P occurs not only in the brain and the gonad, but also in muscle and heart. Thus, FXR1P is essential to maintain the morphology, structure, and function of these cells.

As FXR1P and BTF are both proteins, and they play key roles in the growth and development of cells, we speculated that there may be two possible types of interaction: (i) when the cells of the body are in the repair or embryonic period and a large number of cells need repair, FXR1P restrains the function of BTF; (ii) when the growth of the cells is excessive and it needs to inhibit this growth to maintain the balance of the cells, FXR1P maybe promotes the function of BTF. Finally, to make BTF and FXR1P attain the dynamic equilibrium, we hypothesized that the interaction between BTF and FXR1P can influence the apoptosis and growing development of the cells.

Moreover, it is worth noting that FXR1P is an RBP. Recent research showed that FXR1P can interact with RNA [51–56] and affect its stability [51], which suggested that FXR1P can participate in regulating gene expression with two pathways: one is to utilize the miRNA pathway to regulate target mRNA expression [57,58]; the other is to play a role in post-transcriptional regulation by interacting with mRNA directly and affecting the stability of mRNA [51]. Although we have not yet known the specific mechanism and interaction between FXR1P and BTF, we can be sure that BTF is a new member of the regulatory networks of FXR1P, and plays a certain role in the entire regulatory system. Meanwhile, FXR1P may also take part in the apoptosis pathway through the regulation by the Bcl-2 protein family and play a role in the process of regulating the growth and development of the cells. Further studies are necessary to clarify the specific mechanism.

We screened 10 FXR1P-interacted proteins including BTF by a yeast two-hybrid system. The encoded product of BTF is Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1. The interaction between FXR1P and BTF was confirmed not only by retesting in yeast using both a β-galactosidase assay and growth studies on selective media, but also by a co-immunoprecipitation assay and a subcellular co-localization assay in mammalian cells. Furthermore, BTF was co-localized with FXR1P in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. The present findings suggested that FXR1P may play an important role in the regulation of the cell apoptosis mechanism and in damage recognition and repair by interacting with BTF. In the future, it will be important to explore the roles of FXR1P in cell apoptosis and of FXR1P interaction with BTF in FXS.

In summary, this study, for the first time, showed that FXR1P interacts with BTF in vivo and proved that FXR1P and BTF can co-localize mainly in the cytoplasm around the nucleus.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81200881) and the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12JJ6073).

References

  • 1.Martin JP, Bell J. A pedigree of mental defect showing sex-linkage. J Neurol Psychiatry. 1943;6:154–157. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.6.3-4.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hjalgrim H, Gronskov K, Brondum-Nielsen K, Fragile X. Syndrome: diagnosis, genetics and clinical findings. Ugeskr Laeger. 1998;160:5330–5334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhong N, Ju W, Xu W, Ye L, Shen Y, Wu G, Chen SH, et al. Frequency of the fragile X syndrome in Chinese mentally retarded populations is similar to that in Caucasians. Am J Med Genet. 1999;84:191–194. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990528)84:3<191::aid-ajmg3>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fryns JP, Kleczkowska A, Kubien E, Van den Berghe H. Cytogenetic findings in moderate and severe mental retardation. A study of an institutionalized population of 1991 patients. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1984;313:1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Richards S, Verkerk AJ, et al. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell. 1991;67:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sutherland GR. The fragile X chromosome. Int Rev Cytol. 1983;81:107–143. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirkpatrick LL, McIlwain KA, Nelson DL. Comparative genomic sequence analysis of the FXR gene family: FMR1, FXR1, and FXR2. Genomics. 2001;78:169–177. doi: 10.1006/geno.2001.6667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Y, O'Connor JP, Siomi MC, Srinivasan S, Dutra A, Nussbaum RL, Dreyfuss G. The fragile X mental retardation syndrome protein interacts with novel homologs FXR1 and FXR2. EMBO J. 1995;14:5358–5366. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00220.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Engels B, van't Padje S, Blonden L, Severijnen LA, Oostra BA, Willemsen R. Characterization of Fxr1 in Danio rerio; a simple vertebrate model to study costamere development. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3329–3338. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Siomi MC, Zhang Y, Siomi H, Dreyfuss G. Specific sequences in the fragile X syndrome protein FMR1 and the FXR proteins mediate their binding to 60S ribosomal subunits and the interactions among them. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:3825–3832. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eberhart DE, Malter HE, Feng Y, Warren ST. The fragile X mental retardation protein is a ribonucleoprotein containing both nuclear localization and nuclear export signals. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:1083–1091. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.8.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adams-Cioaba MA, Guo Y, Bian C, Amaya MF, Lam R, Wasney GA, Vedadi M, et al. Structural studies of the tandem Tudor domains of fragile X mental retardation related proteins FXR1 and FXR2. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kirkpatrick LL, McIlwain KA, Nelson DL. Alternative splicing in the murine and human FXR1 genes. Genomics. 1999;59:193–202. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mientjes EJ, Willemsen R, Kirkpatrick LL, Nieuwenhuizen IM, Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Verweij M, Reis S, et al. Fxr1 knockout mice show a striated muscle phenotype: implications for Fxr1p function in vivo. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1291–1302. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khandjian EW, Bardoni B, Corbin F, Sittler A, Giroux S, Heitz D, Tremblay S, et al. Novel isoforms of the fragile X related protein FXR1P are expressed during myogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:2121–2128. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.13.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huot ME, Bisson N, Davidovic L, Mazroui R, Labelle Y, Moss T, Khandjian EW. The RNA-binding protein fragile X-related 1 regulates somite formation in Xenopus laevis. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:4350–4361. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van't Padje S, Chaudhry B, Severijnen LA, van der Linde HC, Mientjes EJ, Oostra BA, Willemsen R. Reduction in fragile X related 1 protein causes cardiomyopathy and muscular dystrophy in zebrafish. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:2564–2570. doi: 10.1242/jeb.032532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davidovic L, Sacconi S, Bechara EG, Delplace S, Allegra M, Desnuelle C, Bardoni B. Alteration of expression of muscle specific isoforms of the fragile X related protein 1 (FXR1P) in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients. J Med Genet. 2008;45:679–685. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.060541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Su J, He SY, Li BY, Ma Y, Yu CS. Screening of proteins binding to FXR1P using yeast two-hybrid technique. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2009;29:2394–2400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haworth RS, Cuello F, Herron TJ, Franzen G, Kentish JC, Gautel M, Avkiran M. Protein kinase D is a novel mediator of cardiac troponin I phosphorylation and regulates myofilament function. Circ Res. 2004;95:1091–1099. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000149299.34793.3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reibetanz U, Chen MH, Mutukumaraswamy S, Mutukumaraswamy S, Liaw ZY, Oh BH, Venkatraman S, et al. Colloidal DNA carriers for direct localization in cell compartments by pH sensoring. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:1779–1784. doi: 10.1021/bm100237r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li C, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Yu M, Yu W. Helicobacter pylori VacA up-regulates secretion of macrophages by transfection of VacA eukaryotic expression vector. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2008;48:349–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fujita Y, Yamaguchi A, Hata K, Endo M, Yamaguchi N, Yamashita T. Zyxin is a novel interacting partner for SIRT1. BMC Cell Biol. 2009;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-10-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Von Brunn A, Teepe C, Simpson JC, Pepperkok R, Friedel CC, Zimmer R, Roberts R, et al. Analysis of intraviral protein-protein interactions of the SARS coronavirus ORFeome. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bhardwaj D, Sheikh AH, Sinha AK, Tuteja N. Stress induced beta subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins from Pisum sativum interacts with mitogen activated protein kinase. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6:287–292. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.2.14971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Borth N, Litsche K, Franke C, Sachse K, Saluz HP, Hänel F. Functional interaction between type III-secreted protein IncA of Chlamydophila psittaci and human G3BP1. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiong YS, Yu J, Li C, Zhu L, Wu LJ, Zhong RQ. The role of Siglec-1 and SR-BI interaction in the phagocytosis of oxidized low density lipoprotein by macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ma ZY, Zhang J, Li XL, Xi ZM, Hu YZ. Construction of eukaryotic plasmid expression Hsf4b and phosphorylation of Hsf4b by MAP kinase P38. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010;26:325–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Covaleda L, Gno BT, Fuller FJ, Payne SL. Identification of cellular proteins interacting with equine infectious anemia virus S2 protein. Virus Res. 2010;151:235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bardoni B, Schenck A, Mandel JL. A novel RNA-binding nuclear protein that interacts with the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) protein. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2557–2566. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.13.2557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Reiner O, et al. Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell. 1991;65:905–914. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90397-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sutcliffe JS, Nelson DL, Zhang F, Pieretti M, Caskey CT, Saxe D, Warren ST. DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:397–400. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.6.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cavallaro S, Paratore S, Fradale F, de Vrij FM, Willemsen R, Oostra BA. Genes and pathways differentially expressed in the brains of Fxr2 knockout mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;3:510–520. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miernyk JA, Thelen JJ. Biochemical approaches for discovering protein-protein interactions. Plant J. 2008;53:597–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoeffer CA, Sanchez E, Hagerman RJ, Mu Y, Nguyen DV, Wong H, Whelan AM, et al. Altered mTOR signaling and enhanced CYFIP2 expression levels in subjects with fragile X syndrome. Genes Brain Behav. 2012;11:332–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00768.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schenck A, Bardoni B, Moro A, Bagni C, Mandel JL. A highly conserved protein family interacting with the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and displaying selective interactions with FMRP-related proteins FXR1P and FXR2P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8844–8849. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151231598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Golemis EA, Serebriiskii I, Law SF. The yeast two-hybrid system: criteria for detecting physiologically significant protein-protein interactions. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 1999;1:31–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu L. Yeast GAL4 two-hybrid system: a genetic system to identify proteins that interact with a target protein. Methods Mol Biol. 1997;63:173–196. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-481-X:173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Williamson MP, Sutcliffe MJ. Protein-protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:875–878. doi: 10.1042/BST0380875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vergnon AL, Chu YH. Electrophoretic methods for studying protein-protein interaction. Methods. 1999;19:270–277. doi: 10.1006/meth.1999.0856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Adler J, Pagakis SN, Parmryd I. Replicate-based noise corrected correlation for accurate measurements of colocalization. J Microsc. 2008;230:121–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee SH, Kalejta RF, Kerry J, Semmes OJ, O'Connor CM, Khan Z, Garcia BA, et al. BclAF1 restriction factor is neutralized by proteasomal degradation and microRNA repression during human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc Natl Aad Sci USA. 2012;109:9575–9580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207496109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee YY, Yu YB, Gunawardena HP, Xie L, Chen X. BCLAF1 is a radiation-induced H2AX-interacting partner involved in γH2AX-mediated regulation of apoptosis and DNA repair. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:1038–1050. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Takahiro N, Naohiko S, Ken-ichi I, Ayako T, Nobuo N. Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. V. the coding sequences of 40 new genes (KIAA016-KIAA0200) deduced by analysis of cDNA colonies from human cell line KG-1. DNA Res. 1996;3:17–24. doi: 10.1093/dnares/3.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kasof GM, Goyal L, White E. Btf, a novel death-promoting transcriptional repressor that interacts with bcl-2-related protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:4390–4404. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.6.4390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schaal TD, Maniatis T. Multiple distinct splicing enhancers in the protein-coding sequences of a constitutively spliced pre-mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:261–273. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.1.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smith CJ, Valcarcel J. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing: the logic of combinatorial control. TIBS. 2000;25:381–388. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01604-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hastings ML, Krainer AR. Pre-mRNA splicing in the new millennium. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13:302–309. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00212-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Merz C, Urlaub H, Will CL, Luhrmann R. Protein composition of human mRNPs spliced in vitro and differential requirements for mRNP protein recruitment. RNA. 2007;13:116–128. doi: 10.1261/rna.336807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bracken CP, Wall SJ, Barre B, Panov KI, Ajuh PM, Perkins ND. Regulation of cyclin D1 RNA stability by SNIP1. Cancer. 2008;68:7621–7628. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Davidovic L, Durand N, Khalfallah O, Tabet R, Barbry P, Mari B, Sacconi S, et al. A novel role for the RNA-binding protein FXR1P in myoblasts cell-cycle progression by modulating p21/Cdkn1a/Cip1/Waf1 mRNA stability. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Garnon J, Lachance C, Di Marco S, Hel Z, Marion D, Ruiz MC, Newkirk MM, et al. Fragile X-related protein FXR1P regulates proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor expression at the post-transcriptional level. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5750–5763. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401988200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vasudevan S, Steitz JA. AU-rich-element-mediated upregulation of translation by FXR1 and Argonaute 2. Cell. 2007;128:1105–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bechara E, Davidovic L, Melko M, Bensaid M, Tremblay S, Grosgeorge J, Khandjian EW, et al. Fragile X related protein 1 isoforms differentially modulate the affinity of fragile X mental retardation protein for G-quartet RNA structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:299–306. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Whitman SA, Cover C, Yu L, Nelson DL, Zarnescu DC, Gregorio CC. Desmoplakin and talin2 are novel mRNA targets of fragile X-related protein-1 in cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 2011;109:262–271. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.244244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zarnescua DC, Gregorio CC. Fragile hearts: new insights into translational control in cardiac muscle. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2013;pii:S1050–S1738. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Edbauer D, Neilson JR, Foster KA, Wang CF, Seeburg DP, Batterton MN, Tada T, et al. Regulation of synaptic structure and function by FMRP-associated microRNA miR-125b and miR-132. Neuron. 2010;65:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xu XL, Zong R, Li Z, Biswas MH, Fang Z, Nelson DL, Gao FB. FXR1P but not FMRP regulates the levels of mammalian brain specific microRNA-9 and microRNA-124. J Neurosci. 2011;31:13705–13709. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2827-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES