Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2008 Mar 15;197(6):854–857. doi: 10.1086/527326

Ribavirin Reduces Mortality in Enterovirus 71–Infected Mice by Decreasing Viral Replication

Zhao-Hong Li 1, Chien-Ming Li 4, Pin Ling 1, Fang-Hsiu Shen 2, Shih-Heng Chen 2, Ching-Chuan Liu 3, Chun-Keung Yu 1, Shun-Hua Chen 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7109938  PMID: 18279075

Abstract

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) causes fatal encephalitis in young children. However, there is no effective antiviral drug available for infected patients. Ribavirin is currently used for the treatment of several RNA virus infections clinically, so its anti-EV71 efficacy was evaluated. In vitro results showed that ribavirin effectively reduced the viral yields (with an IC50 of 65 μg/mL) and virus-induced cytopathic effect in human and mouse cell lines. In vivo results showed that ribavirin reduced the mortality, morbidity, and subsequent paralysis sequelae in infected mice by decreasing viral loads in tissues. Thus, ribavirin could be a potential anti-EV71 drug


Enterovirus 71 (EV71), a member of the family Picornaviridae, infects humans by the fecal-oral route before inducing herpangina, viremia, and hand-foot-and-mouth disease. The initial illness is self-limited, but it is sometimes followed by fatal neurological symptoms, such as aseptic meningitis, brain-stem encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, and acute flaccid paralysis similar to paralytic poliomyelitis, particularly in infants and young children [1, 2]. Subsequently, some survivors of severe cases are left with long-term neurological sequelae, delayed neurodevelopment, and reduced cognitive functioning [3]. EV71 outbreaks have been reported periodically throughout the world. The largest and most severe outbreak occurred in Taiwan in 1998; 129,106 cases of herpangina and hand-foot-and-mouth disease, 405 cases of neurological and cardiopulmonary complications, and 78 deaths were reported [2]. Since then, EV71 infection has become endemic in Taiwan and caused >40 deaths per year in 2000 and 2001

Currently, there is no effective antiviral drug available to treat patients with EV71 infection. Only supportive care and intravenous immunoglobulin are available for severe cases, but the therapeutic efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin seems limited [1]. Among antiviral compounds, pleconaril has been shown to inhibit picornaviruses, including coxsackievirus and rhinovirus [4], but has failed to show a protective effect in EV71-infected patients [1] or to reduce the cytopathic effect (CPE) in cells induced by EV71 isolated from a patient during the outbreak in Taiwan in 1998 [4]. To date, pyridyl imidazolidinone derivatives are the only compounds with promising anti-EV71 activity in vitro [4]; however, it will take years for these new compounds to be approved for use in patients

Ribavirin is a nucleoside analogue with broad-spectrum antiviral activity against a variety of viruses, such as coxsackievirus and echovirus among picornaviruses [5, 6]. It is currently used to treat patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or respiratory syncytial virus [7, 8]. It has also been shown to reduce the severity of disease in patients with encephalitis induced by Nipah virus, La Crosse virus, or measles virus and in patients with hemorrhagic fever induced by Lassa fever virus or hantavirus [9, 10]. In addition, it is recommended for clinical trials in patients with encephalitis induced by West Nile virus, Junin virus, or Rift Valley fever virus [10–12]. Thus, the anti-EV71 efficacy of ribavirin was evaluated in the present study. Our results showed that ribavirin reduces EV71 replication in vitro and in vivo

MethodsHuman muscular (rhabdomyosarcoma [RD]) and neuronal (SK-N-SH) and mouse neuronal (N18) cell lines were maintained in medium according to the instructions of the American Type Culture Collection. EV71 strain Tainan/4643/98 (GenBank accession number AF304458) [13] isolated from a patient with encephalomyelitis in Taiwan in 1998 was propagated and titrated in RD cells and used to infect human cell lines. Tainan/4643/98 was passed in mice 4 times to obtain mouse-adapted strain MP4 [13]. MP4 was passed in mice 2 more times in our laboratory and designated strain M2. M2 was propagated and titrated in RD cells and used to infect N18 cells or mice

For the antiviral assay, RD and SK-N-SH cells (6×105) were infected with 5000 pfu of Tainan/4643/98, and N18 cells (6×105) were infected with 5000 pfu of M2. The infected cells were cultured in medium with or without various concentrations of ribavirin (MP Biomedicals) 2 h after infection. Infected RD, SK-N-SH, and N18 cells were harvested at 48, 25, and 25 h after infection, respectively, to determine viral yields by plaque assay on RD cells

To determine whether ribavirin reduces virus-induced CPE, SK-N-SH cells were mock-infected or infected with 5000 pfu of Tainan/4643/98, cultured in medium without or with ribavirin (60 μg/mL), and observed under a microscope. Photomicrographs were obtained at 25 h after infection

All mouse experiment protocols for the mouse protection assay were approved by the Laboratory Animal Committee at National Cheng Kung University. To test the anti-EV71 efficacy of ribavirin in vivo, 12–14-day-old ICR mice (Charles River Laboratories) were infected with 5×104 to 1×105 pfu of M2 by intraperitoneal inoculation. Infected mice were given 1 intraperitoneal injection of PBS or ribavirin (100 mg/kg) daily for 9 days, starting 2 h after infection. Infected mice were monitored daily for 30 days for signs of disease and survival, and the clinical score was graded as follows: 0, healthy; 1, ruffled hair; 2, weakness in hind limbs; 3, paralysis in single hind limb; 4, paralysis in both hind limbs; and 5, death. In separate experiments, the brains and spinal cords of infected mice treated with ribavirin or PBS were collected on day 5 after infection. The brain stems (pons-medulla region) were dissected from the brains. Samples were frozen, homogenized, and frozen again. The frozen samples were thawed and sonicated, and the viral titers of samples were determined by plaque assay on RD cells

ResultsThe anti-EV71 efficacy of ribavirin was first tested in vitro using human muscular (RD) and neuronal (SK-N-SH) cell lines infected with a clinical isolate of EV71 (strain Tainan/4643/98) and a mouse neuronal (N18) cell line infected with a mouse-adapted EV71 strain (M2) derived from Tainan/4643/98. The infected cells were treated with or without various concentrations of ribavirin at 2 h after infection and then harvested to determine viral titers from 25 to 48 h after infection. The viral titers of RD, SK-N-SH, and N18 cell cultures without ribavirin treatment reached 9, 9, and 6×104 pfu/culture, respectively. Under these conditions, ribavirin was able to reduce the viral yields of RD, SK-N-SH, and N18 cells in a dose-dependent manner (figure 1A), demonstrating that the inhibition of EV71 replication by ribavirin is not a phenomenon specific to human or mouse cells or to a particular cell type. Additional experiments showed that ribavirin did not significantly affect the proliferation of SK-N-SH cells and had little toxicity to the cells (data not shown; figure 2figure 2)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A Inhibition of EV71 replication by ribavirin in rhabdomyosarcoma (RD), SK-N-SH, and N18 cell lines. The viral titers in the ribavirin-treated cell sample were divided by those in the untreated sample and expressed as percentages of control values. The data shown are mean ± SE values from 2 independent experiments, each done in duplicate. *P<.05, compared with untreated sample (Student’s t test). B Reduction of virus-induced cytopathic effect by ribavirin in human neuronal cells. SK-N-SH cells were mock-infected or infected with EV71, cultured in medium without or with ribavirin (60 μg/mL), and observed under a microscope. Photomicrographs were obtained 25 h after infection (original magnification, ×100). The data shown represent 2 experiments

Figure 2.

Figure 2

No significant effect of ribavirin on the proliferation of SK-N-SH cells, and little toxic effect on the cells. Uninfected SK-N-SH cells were cultured in medium with or without various concentrations of ribavirin for 23 h. The effect of ribavirin on cell proliferation was determined by MTS assay (A). The cytotoxicity effect of ribavirin was determined by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase from lysed cells (B). Pub _bookmark Command="[Quick Mark]">The values in the ribavirin-treated samples were divided by those in the untreated sample and expressed as percentages of control values. Data are mean ± SE values from at least 3 independent experiments

Figure 2.

Figure 2

No significant effect of ribavirin on the proliferation of SK-N-SH cells, and little toxic effect on the cells

Ribavirin effectively inhibited EV71 replication in infected cells, so we further investigated whether it could reduce virus-induced CPE. When infected SK-N-SH cells were not treated with ribavirin, >90% of cells developed CPE 25 h after infection (figure 1B). However, the monolayer of infected cells treated with 60 μg/mL ribavirin remained as intact as that of mock-infected cells. These data indicate that ribavirin prevents virus-induced CPE

The antiviral and protective effects of ribavirin were tested in vivo by assessing its ability to reduce mortality and morbidity in EV71-infected mice. Mice were intraperitoneally infected with M2 and then treated with ribavirin (100 mg/kg) once daily. All infected mice given PBS developed hind limb paralysis with signs of encephalitis manifested by hunched posture, lethargy, ataxia, and anorexia, and only 27% of mice (3/11) survived (figure 3A). The infected mice treated with ribavirin showed a marked reduction in mortality, with a survival rate of 70% (7/10), significantly higher than that in PBS-treated mice (P<.05, log-rank test). Ribavirin-treated mice did not show obvious symptoms on day 5 after infection, whereas PBS-treated mice began to develop paralysis in their hind limbs (figure 3B). The hind limbs of ribavirin-treated mice were slightly paralyzed, but the severity was significantly less than that in PBS-treated mice from day 5 to day 30 after infection (P<.05, Wilcoxon test). Thus, ribavirin treatment significantly reduced mortality, morbidity, and subsequent paralysis sequelae in infected mice

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Reduction of the mortality and subsequent paralysis sequelae of EV71-infected mice by ribavirin, via reduction of viral loads in tissues. Infected mice were treated with PBS (white symbols; n=11) or ribavirin (black symbols; n=10). The survival rates (A) and clinical scores (B) of mice were recorded. C, In separate experiments, the brains (without brain-stem region), brain stems, and spinal cords of infected mice treated with PBS (n=6) or ribavirin (n=6) were collected on day 5 after infection to determine viral titers. Data are mean ± SE values. *P<.05, by log-rank test (A) Wilcoxon test (B) and Mann-Whitney U test (C)

It has been shown that the brain stem and spinal cord are the main targets of EV71 in severe cases of human infections [1]. Our previous study showed that high levels of virus were detected in the mouse central nervous system on day 5 after infection [13]. Accordingly, we next investigated the viral loads in the mouse central nervous system on day 5 after infection. Our data showed that ribavirin treatment reduced the viral loads in the brains (without brain-stem region), brain stems, and spinal cords of EV71-infected mice (figure 3C). Additional experiments showed that the virus harvested from the tissues of mice receiving ribavirin treatment was still sensitive to ribavirin treatment (data not shown)

DiscussionThis is the first report that ribavirin, which is currently used to treat several RNA virus infections in patients, has antiviral activities against EV71 in vitro and particularly in vivo by reducing viral loads in tissues, mortality and morbidity during acute infection, and subsequent sequelae in infected mice. This finding is particularly important, because there is no effective antiviral drug currently available for the prevention, treatment, and control of fatal EV71 infection in humans

Our in vitro experiments showed a direct anti-EV71 action by ribavirin in both human and mouse cell lines. The IC50 of ribavirin for EV71 is 65 μg/mL (266 μmol/L) in both RD and SK-N-SH cells, which is lower than that found for other neurotropic viruses, such as Nipah virus, West Nile virus, and Japanese encephalitis virus (IC50 values of 100, 71, and 134 μg/mL, respectively) [14, 15]. Previous studies showed that 80–400 mg/kg ribavirin daily reduces the mortality in rats with encephalitis induced by Junin virus [11], in rhesus monkeys with encephalitis induced by Rift Valley fever virus [12], and in mice with myocarditis induced by coxsackievirus B3 [6]. On the basis of these studies, 100 mg/kg ribavirin was chosen to treat EV71-infected mice, and this dose showed a protective effect. In our study, ribavirin was given to infected mice during the viremic phase (data not shown). Further studies are needed to test the efficacy of ribavirin therapy beginning later in the disease course in mice

For Nipah virus, despite the IC50 of ribavirin being higher than that for EV71 and the fact that the drug fails to prevent the deaths of infected hamsters [14], ribavirin treatment significantly reduces mortality in patients with encephalitis without inducing the adverse effects (such as anemia, jaundice, and teratogenic effects) commonly associated with a 6–9-day regimen of oral ribavirin, starting with a loading dose of 2000 mg daily, or with a 7-day regimen of intravenous ribavirin, starting with a loading dose of 94 mg/kg daily [10]. Under these regimens, the plasma concentration of ribavirin is 2.5 μg/mL, which is comparable to that found in HCV-infected patients treated with the drug [7]. The concentration of ribavirin in cerebrospinal fluid is 70% of that in plasma in humans [16]. Interestingly, the IC50 of ribavirin for Nipah virus is >40 times higher than the clinically achievable concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. For HCV, the IC50 of ribavirin is 230 μmol/L (56 μg/mL), >22 times higher than the plasma concentration [17]. In fact, the IC50 of ribavirin for almost all viruses for which the drug shows therapeutic efficacy in patients—including measles virus, respiratory syncytial virus, La Crosse virus, hantavirus virus, and Lassa virus [5, 8, 9, 18–21]—are much higher than the plasma concentrations. Evidently, ribavirin inhibits viruses more efficiently in vivo than in vitro

In the present study, we found that the IC50 of ribavirin for EV71 is lower than that for Nipah virus [14]. Most importantly, unlike in Nipah virus [14], ribavirin protects mice from EV71 infection by reducing the viral loads in tissues. In addition, the dose of ribavirin that effectively protects mice from EV71 infection is close to the initial dose of the drug used intravenously to improve the conditions of patients with encephalitis induced by Nipah virus [10]. Collectively, these data demonstrate that ribavirin could be a potential anti-EV71 drug. Our previous study showed that type I interferons also reduce mortality in EV71-infected mice [22]. Alternatively, the combination of ribavirin and interferon, which has a synergistic effect and is used as a standard therapy for HCV-infected patients, could be considered for the treatment of potentially fatal EV71 infection

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Lausch and C. C. Lee for critical reading of the manuscript, J. D. Huang for assistance in calculating IC50 values, and J. T. A. Hsu for helpful discussion

Footnotes

Potential conflicts of interest: none reported

Presented in part: Pasteur/NHRI/CDC Symposium on Re-Emerging Virus Infections, Tainan, Taiwan, 1 September 2006 (abstract POS-17)

Financial support: National Health Research Institute, Department of Health, Republic of China (grant NHRI-EX95–9530NI)

References

  • 1.Nolan MA, Craig ME, Lahra MM, et al. Survival after pulmonary edema due to enterovirus 71 encephaliti. Neurology. 2003;60:1651–6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000066810.62490.ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan Enterovirus Epidemic Working Grou. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:929–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909233411301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang LY, Huang LM, Gau SS, et al. Neurodevelopment and cognition in children after enterovirus 71 infectio. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1226–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shia KS, Li WT, Chang CM, et al. Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship of pyridyl imidazolidinones: a novel class of potent and selective human enterovirus 71 inhibitor. J Med Chem. 2002;45:1644–55. doi: 10.1021/jm010536a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kirsi JJ, North JA, McKernan PA, et al. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of 2-beta-D-ribofuranosylselenazole-4-carboxamide, a new antiviral agen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983;24:353–61. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kishimoto C, Crumpacker CS, Abelmann WH. Ribavirin treatment of murine coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis with analyses of lymphocyte subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:1334–41. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92618-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dumortier J, Ducos E, Scoazec JY, Chevallier P, Boillot O, Gagnieu MC. Plasma ribavirin concentrations during treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin combination after liver transplantatio. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:538–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2006.00720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jairath S, Vargas PB, Hamlin HA, Field AK, Kilkuskie RE. Inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus replication by antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Antiviral Res. 1997;33:201–13. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(96)01015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McJunkin JE, Khan R, de los Reyes EC, et al. Treatment of severe La Crosse encephalitis with intravenous ribavirin following diagnosis by brain biops. Pediatrics. 1997;99:261–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chong HT, Kamarulzaman A, Tan CT, et al. Treatment of acute Nipah encephalitis with ribaviri. Ann Neurol. 2001;49:810–3. doi: 10.1002/ana.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Remesar MC, Blejer JL, Weissenbacher MC, Nejamkis MR. Ribavirin effect on experimental Junin virus-induced encephaliti. J Med Virol. 1988;26:79–84. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890260111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peters CJ, Reynolds JA, Slone TW, Jones DE, Stephen EL. Prophylaxis of Rift Valley fever with antiviral drugs, immune serum, an interferon inducer, and a macrophage activato. Antiviral Res. 1986;6:285–97. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(86)90024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang YF, Chou CT, Lei HY, et al. A mouse-adapted enterovirus 71 strain causes neurological disease in mice after oral infectio. J Virol. 2004;78:7916–24. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.15.7916-7924.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Georges-Courbot MC, Contamin H, Faure C, et al. Poly(I)-poly(C12U) but not ribavirin prevents death in a hamster model of Nipah virus infectio. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1768–72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1768-1772.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crance JM, Scaramozzino N, Jouan A, Garin D. Interferon, ribavirin, 6-azauridine and glycyrrhizin: antiviral compounds active against pathogenic flaviviruse. Antiviral Res. 2003;58:73–9. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Connor E, Morrison S, Lane J, Oleske J, Sonke RL, Connor J. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of systemic ribavirin in children with human immunodeficiency virus infectio. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:532–9. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.3.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saito Y, Escuret V, Durantel D, Zoulim F, Schinazi RF, Agrofoglio LA. Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazolo-carbanucleoside analogues of ribavirin targeting an HCV in replico. Bioorg Med Chem. 2003;11:3633–9. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(03)00349-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cassidy LF, Patterson JL. Mechanism of La Crosse virus inhibition by ribaviri. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:2009–11. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.11.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hosoya M, Mori S, Tomoda A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and effects of ribavirin following intraventricular administration for treatment of subacute sclerosing panencephaliti. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4631–5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4631-4635.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murphy ME, Kariwa H, Mizutani T, Yoshimatsu K, Arikawa J, Takashima I. In vitro antiviral activity of lactoferrin and ribavirin upon hantaviru. Arch Virol. 2000;145:1571–82. doi: 10.1007/s007050070077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gunther S, Asper M, Roser C, et al. Application of real-time PCR for testing antiviral compounds against Lassa virus, SARS coronavirus and Ebola virus in vitr. Antiviral Res. 2004;63:209–15. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu ML, Lee YP, Wang YF, et al. Type I interferons protect mice against enterovirus 71 infectio. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:3263–9. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81195-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES