Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2019 May 14;65:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.011

Genotyping of avian infectious bronchitis virus in Iran: Detection of D274 and changing in the genotypes rate

Arash Ghalyanchilangeroudi a, Hossein Hosseini b,, Mohammad Hossein Fallah Mehrabadi c, Seyed Ali Ghafouri d, Amir Modiri Hamdan a, Zahra Ziafati a, Reza Esmaeelzadeh Dizaji a, Peyman Mohammadi a
PMCID: PMC7112693  PMID: 31300098

Highlights

  • An updating data about avian infectious bronchitis genotypes circulating in Iran.

  • First detection of D274 genotype in Iran.

Keywords: Avian infectious bronchitis virus, D274, Spike, Phylogenetic analysis, Iran

Abstract

The coronavirus avian Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) poses economic threats to poultry farms worldwide, affecting the performance of both meat-type and egg-laying birds. To define the evolution of recent IBVs in Iran, a genetic analysis based on hypervariable nucleotide sequences of S1 gene was carried out. Tracheal swab samples were collected from 170 Broiler flocks during 2017. Ten tracheal swabs from each flock pooled. From a total number of 170 flocks tested, 84.71% found to be positive. Phylogenetic tree analysis revealed the presence of D274 as a first time in Iran. IS/1494/06 was showed to be dominant IBV type circulating in broiler farms with a significantly higher prevalence than other four genotypes. Considering fluctuations in QX-type prevalence in recent years, continuous monitoring is necessary to reduce economic consequences in layer and broiler farms. The findings highlight the importance of using modified vaccination strategies that are adapted to the changing disease scenario.

1. Introduction

Avian Infectious bronchitis virus is the prototype gammacoronavirus in the family Coronaviridae, order Nidovirales. As its name implies Avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is responsible for acute respiratory tract infections in chickens. Laying hens experience reduced production, eggshell abnormalities, and decreased internal egg quality. In addition to tracheal damage, some strains of IBV can cause renal lesions. The positive-sense viral genome 27.6 kb in length encodes at least ten open reading frames (ORFs) organized as follows: 5′ UTR-1a-1ab-S-3a-3b-E-M-5a-5b-N-3a-3′UTR. ORFs 1a and 1b encode 15 non-structural proteins responsible for viral replication and pathogenesis. Four structural proteins including the spike glycoprotein (S), small membrane protein (E), membrane glycoprotein (M), and nucleocapsid protein (N) are encoded by mRNAs 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively [1,2]. The spike protein is post-translationally cleaved into S1 and S2. The S1 subunit is the main target of neutralizing antibodies. Evolution in IBV is essentially associated with the sequences of the S1 glycoprotein, and the genetic diversity of IBV is principally screened by analysis of the S1 gene. Mutations in the S1 leads to the emergence of variant serotypes which do not confer complete cross-protection against each other [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. Among a large number of serotypes or variants emerged after the first documentation of IBV in 1931, Massachusetts 41 (M41) and 793/B serotypes have been expanded through the world and commercial vaccines are available against both serotypes providing a broad cross-protection against many different IBV types when used together [[7], [8], [9]]. Despite vaccination efforts, novel field IBVs continue to emerge; some antigenic variants may subsequently become dominant which makes prevention of IBV infections very challenging [10,11]. Similar to what has been happening in Iranian poultry farms leading to unceasing IB outbreaks despite extensive vaccination. In this work, we focus on potential IBV variants escaping from vaccine-induced immunity.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Sample collection

Tracheal swab samples were collected from 170 broiler flocks representing signs of the respiratory complex in 2017. Chickens had a history of vaccination against IBV (Massachusetts + 793/B type vaccines). The chicken farms were located in nine different provinces of Iran including Qazvin, Ardabil, Semnan, Kerman, Khurasan Razavi, Chahrmahal-E-Bakhtiari, Kurdistan, Qom, and Golestan. Geographical locations of these provinces are shown in Fig. 1 .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Geographical locations of provinces selected for sample collection.

1, Kurdistan; 2, Ardabil; 3, Qazvin; 4, Golestan; 5, Qom; 6, Semnan; 7, Khurasan Razavi; 8, Chahrmahal-E-Bakhtiari; 9, Kerman.

2.2. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Ten tracheal swabs from each flock were pooled. Homogenized pooled samples were submitted for RNA isolation using RNA easy mini kit (Qiagen). The cDNA was synthesized using a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) [12].

2.3. Real-time PCR for IBV detection and RT-PCR for IBV Genotyping

A previously designated Real-time PCR [13] was used for IBV detection targeting 5′ UTR of the IBV genome. IBV positive samples were submitted to a nested PCR amplification with the aim of genotyping [12]. PCR products were purified using the AccuPrep® PCR purification Kit (Bioneer Co., Korea) and submitted for sequencing (Bioneer Co., Korea).

The AccuPrep® PCR purification Kit (Bioneer Co., Korea) was used for purification of the PCR products. Sequencing was performed using ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA) with the primers (Both directions) used in the second step of nested PCR (Bioneer Co., Korea). Chromatograms were evaluated with CromasPro (CromasPro Version 1.5). The nucleotide sequences of S1 gene from Afghan IBV strains obtained in this study were subjected to BLAST (primary genotyping and similarity results), aligned and compared with reference strains downloaded from NCBI GenBank database from foreign Countries and neighboring States. We remove the similar sequences Sequence homology analysis was performed using MEGA7.0. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA7.0 with the neighbor-joining algorithm (bootstrap values of 1000) with the Kimura2 parameter model [14]. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences determined in this study are available in the GenBank under accession number: MH106448-MH106510.

3. Results

From a total number of 170 flocks tested, 84.71% found to be positive. The phylogenetic analysis revealed detected IBVs were divided into five major clusters (Fig. 2 ). The distribution of prevalence rates in each province is depicted in Table 1 . IS-1494-like IBV was the most common type accounted for 85% of detected strains. The other types overall created a lower proportion; including 793/B having a prevalence of 7%, QX, and Mass with prevalence rates of 5% and 2%, respectively, and D274 with the incidence of 1% (Fig. 3 )

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on partial S1 gene sequences of Iranian IBVs and selected reference strains. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches IBVs obtained in this study are marked with black squares; other Iranian IBVs detected in recent years are shown by black diamonds.

Table 1.

Geographical distribution of IBV strains in different provinces of Iran during 2017.

Province Positive (%)
Qazvin 93.33
Ardebil 88.00
Semnan 85.00
Kerman 85.00
Khorasan-e-Razavi 82.35
Chahrmahal-E-Bakhtiari 82.35
Qom 82.35
Golestan 82.35
Kurdestan 81.82

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Proportion of each IBV type circulating in Iran from 2017.

The sequence identity among IS/1494/06 IBV types detected in this work and reference strains was more than 98.86%. Mass IBVs shared more than 98.28% sequence similarities including some strains completely identical to the H120 vaccine. 793/B type IBVs in this study shared 93.29-100% sequence homology with each other, while less with those detected in the last few years. Sequence identities among QX IBVs varied between 89 to 100% (Table 2 ). Fig. 4, Fig. 5 shows comparisons of partial S1 sequences of IBV strains detected in this work with some selected IBV types with 793/B and Mass type respectively (Fig. 4, Fig. 5).

Table 2.

Nucleotide homology between representatives from each distinct cluster and selected reference strains for partial S1 sequences.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1 Iran/IS-1494/UT-GL29/2017
2 Iran/IS-1494/UT-GL30/2017 100
3 Iran/IS-1494/UT-GL28/2017 100 100
4 Iran/IS-1494/UT-GL22/2017 100 100 100
5 Iran/IS-1494/UT-GL37/2017 99.425 99.43 99.425 99.425
6 Iran/Mass/UT-GL50/2017 77.011 77.01 77.011 77.011 77
7 Iran/Mass/UT-GL51/2017 78.736 78.74 78.736 78.736 78.2 98.3
8 Iran/D274/UT-GL48/2017 82.184 82.18 82.184 82.184 81.6 75.3 77.01
9 Iran/793-B/UT-GL55/2017 81.034 81.03 81.034 81.034 80.5 69.5 71.26 81
10 Iran/QX/UT-GL53/2017 82.184 82.18 82.184 82.184 81.6 73.6 75.29 78.7 82.184
11 Iran/QX/UT-GL54/2017 82.184 82.18 82.184 82.184 81.6 73.6 75.29 78.7 82.184 100
12 Iran/QX/UT-GL52/2017 75.862 75.86 75.862 75.862 75.3 67.2 68.97 71.8 74.138 91.38 91.4
13 Iran/793-B/UT-GL57/2017 78.736 78.74 78.736 78.736 78.2 68.4 70.11 81 97.701 79.89 79.9 71.8
14 Iraq/QX/SGK21(KU143898) 83.908 83.91 83.908 83.908 83.3 74.7 76.44 79.9 82.759 98.28 98.3 89.7 80.46
15 Iran/793-B/UT-IVO108(KT583579) 78.736 78.74 78.736 78.736 78.2 68.4 70.11 81 97.701 79.89 79.9 71.8 100 80.46
16 IR-1_UTIVO-117(KT583581) 86.207 86.21 86.207 86.207 86.8 71.3 72.41 77 78.161 79.89 79.9 72.4 75.86 81.61 75.9
17 Iran/IS-1494/UT-MG161/2017 100 100 100 100 99.4 77 78.74 82.2 81.034 82.18 82.2 75.9 78.74 83.91 78.7 86.2
18 Iran/793-B/UT-MG5/2015 80.46 80.46 80.46 80.46 79.9 70.1 71.84 82.2 95.977 82.18 82.2 74.1 94.83 82.76 94.8 78.2 80.5
19 Iran/QX/UT-MG37/2016 83.908 83.91 83.908 83.908 83.3 74.7 76.44 79.9 82.759 98.28 98.3 89.7 80.46 100 80.5 81.6 83.9 82.8
20 Iran/Mass/UT-MG5_-2015 80.46 80.46 80.46 80.46 79.9 96.6 98.28 78.7 72.989 75.86 75.9 69.5 71.84 77.01 71.8 74.1 80.5 73.6 77
21 4/91Vaccine(KF377577) 81.034 81.03 81.034 81.034 80.5 69.5 71.26 81 100 82.18 82.2 74.1 97.7 82.76 97.7 78.2 81 96 82.8 73
22 H120(JN600610) 78.736 78.74 78.736 78.736 78.2 98.3 100 77 71.264 75.29 75.3 69 70.11 76.44 70.1 72.4 78.7 71.8 76.4 98.3 71.3
23 D3896(X52084) 82.759 82.76 82.759 82.759 82.2 75.3 77.01 95.4 79.885 79.31 79.3 74.1 79.89 80.46 79.9 78.7 82.8 80.5 80.5 78.7 79.9 77
24 IS/1494/06(HM131453) 99.425 99.43 99.425 99.425 98.9 77 78.74 82.8 81.609 82.18 82.2 75.9 79.31 83.91 79.3 86.2 99.4 81 83.9 80.5 81.6 78.7 82.8
25 QX(AF193423) 83.908 83.91 83.908 83.908 83.3 74.7 76.44 80.5 83.333 97.7 97.7 89.1 81.03 99.43 81 81.6 83.9 83.3 99.4 77 83.3 76.4 81 83.9
26 Q1(AF286302) 81.609 81.61 81.609 81.609 81 72.4 74.14 79.3 79.31 78.16 78.2 73 77.01 79.31 77 79.9 81.6 79.3 79.3 75.9 79.3 74.1 79.9 82.2 79.9

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Percent identity of partial S1 gene sequences of some IBVs from the current study to H120 vaccine strain.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Percent identity of partial S1 gene sequences of some IBVs from the current study to 793/B vaccine strain.

4. Discussion

Despite vaccination efforts, novel field IBVs continue to emerge in many parts of the world, leading to the dominance of some antigenic variants that makes prevention of IBV infections very challenging [10,15]. Two independent studies have been dedicated to investigating the IBV epidemiology in Iran. The first one was carried out by Najafi et al. between 2014 and 2015[16], the second was done during 2015–17 [12]. Comparison of their results with the result obtained in this study showed the growing trend in IS/1494/06 IBV prevalence (Fig.6 ).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Prevalence of different types IBV.

The circulation of such a high rate of IS/1494/06 genotype unrelated to the used vaccine strains declaring they originated from several sources. It is one of the most prevalent IBV genotypes in Middle East countries such as Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Saudi Arabia [17]. High sequence similarities among IS/1494/06 IBVs in Iran and those circulating in our neighboring countries including Israel, Iraq, Turkey [16,18], may explain the virus origin. It is not yet known how IS/1494/06 spread among Middle East countries; one may suspect to the role of wild birds in virus transmission [19], another possible reason is intense trade among Middle East countries and illegal movement of animals across borders. With much lower prevalence, 793/B was the second most predominant IBV type in this study. The 793/B serotype is one of IBV types used in our national vaccination program. As the method used in the present study could not differentiate field and vaccine strains, 793/B IBV type was expected to the 793/B vaccine strain use (Fig. 6). In breeder and laying hens QX-type causes delayed the onset of production, poor peak in egg production, a high percentage of false-layers and poor quality of eggs [20]. The QX prevalence obtained in the present study was 5% which could reflect the efficacy of vaccination [21]. Although the prevalence is relatively low, the 2 to 10% fluctuation in its prevalence within a few last years and also increase the genetic distance between field and vaccine strains are worrying, since it is probably currently the IB variant of most concern for breeder/ layer flocks. At the stage that the QX live vaccines are not registered in Iran.

D274, a Dutch strain was first isolated in 1979, reported to be serologically related to both A and B serotypes [22,23]. Strains D207 and D3896 considered belonging to the same serotype as D274 [24]. D207 was isolated in samples collected between 1981 and 1983 in Britain [25]. D274 isolates were recovered from vaccinated and especially non-vaccinated broilers over a 10-year period from 1986 to 1995 in Belgium [26]. It was identified in Egypt (Egypt/D274/D/89) [27]. D274 was detected in Sweden, England and Russia in 1995, 1996 and 1998, respectively [28]. Several reports have been confirmed D274 presence in Western Europe from 2002 to 2006 [19,29,30]. D274 was not detected in the Middle East countries before 2005, its first report from Jordan [31]. After that in a six-year investigation of the dynamics of IBV, D274 was detected in Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, regarding the sequencing data, 62.50% of them identified as field and not vaccine strain[17]. D274 has been detected once in Iran using serological assays (personal communication); the present study reports the first molecular detection of D274 genotype. Since D274 is not included in any vaccine strains used in Iran, it is probably originated from neighboring countries. In addition to biosecurity practices, vaccination is usually needed to control IB. Selecting the proper vaccination schedule will be more complicated considering the existence of many IBV variants. It has been shown that vaccination with two antigenically distinct live-attenuated vaccines such as Mass and 793/B can result in a broad cross-protection against many different IBV types [15]. Awad et al. showed that administering combined live H120 and CR88 vaccines simultaneously at day-old followed by the CR88 vaccine at 14 d-old gave more than 94% tracheal ciliary protection IS/1494/06. The other vaccination program, H120 at day-old followed by CR88 at 14 d-old, the tracheal ciliary protection conferred was 80 percent from IS/1494/06-like [32]. Our experiment in which combination of H120 and 793/B provided better protection than using homologous H120-H120 vaccination strategy, while it was not still completely protect against IS/1494/06 challenge [33].

Awad et al. showed that one-day-old chicks vaccinated with two different mixtures of Mass + 793/B produced 92% and 68% ciliary protection against QX challenge [11]. Mohammadi et al. showed a protective ability of the used vaccination program. The H120 at first day of age followed by 793/B at 14 d of age obtained 81% protection against QX variants circulating in Iran [34].

Ignoring some differences, Mass, and 793/B vaccination strategy seems more relevant in our conditions, in which we are not allowed to use D274, QX, and IS/1494/06 variant vaccines. Another challenging issue is about the application route and timing of vaccination. Vaccines are applied with spray route in a hatchery or the first day of age. Although it is preferred to apply the booster in the form of a spray, mass application through the water is often chosen as chicks grow. The main disadvantages of the latter route are inconsistencies of vaccine dosage depending on water consumption, and the potential for some birds to receive no vaccine at all. This study suggests a vaccination schedule using an initial combination of Mass + 793/B vaccine followed by a 793/B vaccine two weeks later, which appears to confer more protection than an only Mass type vaccine boosted by a 793/B vaccine and the continuing IBV surveillance necessary to make new approaches. Using the generated epidemiological data to help adjust the IB vaccination programs.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ghalyanchilab expert especially Mr. Behrooz Asadi for his extensive technical support and University of Tehran / TINADAROU for their supports.

References

  • 1.Casais R., Davies M., Cavanagh D., Britton P. Gene 5 of the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus is not essential for replication. J. Virol. 2005;79(13):8065–8078. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8065-8078.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hodgson T., Britton P., Cavanagh D. Neither the RNA nor the proteins of open reading frames 3a and 3b of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus are essential for replication. J. Virol. 2006;80(1):296–305. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.1.296-305.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu S., Zhang Q., Chen J., Han Z., Liu X., Feng L., Shao Y., Rong J., Kong X., Tong G. Genetic diversity of avian infectious bronchitis coronavirus strains isolated in China between 1995 and 2004. Arch. Virol. 2006;151(6):1133–1148. doi: 10.1007/s00705-005-0695-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rottier P., Van Beurden S., Verheije M., Mundt E. 2017. Vaccine Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus. US Patent App. 15/622,672. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun C., Han Z., Ma H., Zhang Q., Yan B., Shao Y., Xu J., Kong X., Liu S. Phylogenetic analysis of infectious bronchitis coronaviruses newly isolated in China, and pathogenicity and evaluation of protection induced by Massachusetts serotype H120 vaccine against QX-like strains. Avian Pathol. 2011;40(1):43–54. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2010.538037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abolnik C. Genomic and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of infectious bronchitis coronavirus, Infection. Genet. Evol. 2015;32:416–424. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cook J.K., Orbell S.J., Woods M.A., Huggins M.B. Breadth of protection of the respiratory tract provided by different live-attenuated infectious bronchitis vaccines against challenge with infectious bronchitis viruses of heterologous serotypes. Avian Pathol. 1999;28(5):477–485. doi: 10.1080/03079459994506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bijlenga G., Cook J.K., Gelb J., de Wit J.J. Development and use of the H strain of avian infectious bronchitis virus from the Netherlands as a vaccine: a review. Avian Pathol. 2004;33(6):550–557. doi: 10.1080/03079450400013154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Terregino C., Toffan A., Serena Beato M., De Nardi R., Vascellari M., Meini A., Ortali G., Mancin M., Capua I. Pathogenicity of a QX strain of infectious bronchitis virus in specific pathogen free and commercial broiler chickens, and evaluation of protection induced by a vaccination programme based on the Ma5 and 4/91 serotypes. Avian Pathol. 2008;37(5):487–493. doi: 10.1080/03079450802356938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abro S.H., Renström L.H., Ullman K., Belák S., Baule C. Characterization and analysis of the full-length genome of a strain of the European QX-like genotype of infectious bronchitis virus. Arch. Virol. 2012;157(6):1211–1215. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Awad F., Hutton S., Forrester A., Baylis M., Ganapathy K. Heterologous live infectious bronchitis virus vaccination in day-old commercial broiler chicks: clinical signs, ciliary health, immune responses and protection against variant infectious bronchitis viruses. Avian Pathol. 2016;45(2):169–177. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2015.1137866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamadan A.M., Ghalyanchilangeroudi A., Hashemzadeh M., Hosseini H., Karimi V., Yahyaraeyat R., Najafi H. Genotyping of Avian infectious bronchitis viruses in Iran (2015–2017) reveals domination of IS-1494 like virus. Virus Res. 2017;240:101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Callison S.A., Hilt D.A., Boynton T.O., Sample B.F., Robison R., Swayne D.E., Jackwood M.W. Development and evaluation of a real-time Taqman RT-PCR assay for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus from infected chickens. J. Virol. Methods. 2006;138(1):60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Wit J., Cook J.K., Van der Heijden H.M. Infectious bronchitis virus variants: a review of the history, current situation and control measures. Avian Pathol. 2011;40(3):223–235. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.566260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Najafi H., Langeroudi A.G., Hashemzadeh M., Karimi V., Madadgar O., Ghafouri S.A., Maghsoudlo H., Farahani R.K. Molecular characterization of infectious bronchitis viruses isolated from broiler chicken farms in Iran, 2014-2015. Arch. Virol. 2016;161(1):53–62. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2636-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ganapathy K., Ball C., Forrester A. Genotypes of infectious bronchitis viruses circulating in the Middle East between 2009 and 2014. Virus Res. 2015;210:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seger W., GhalyanchiLangeroudi A., Karimi V., Madadgar O., Marandi M.V., Hashemzadeh M. Genotyping of infectious bronchitis viruses from broiler farms in Iraq during 2014-2015. Arch. Virol. 2016;161(5):1229–1237. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-2790-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bochkov Y.A., Batchenko G.V., Shcherbakova L.O., Borisov A.V., Drygin V.V. Molecular epizootiology of avian infectious bronchitis in Russia. Avian Pathol. 2006;35(5):379–393. doi: 10.1080/03079450600921008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Awad F., Chhabra R., Baylis M., Ganapathy K. An overview of infectious bronchitis virus in chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2014;70(2):375–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karimi V., Mohammadi P., Ghalyanchilangeroudi A., Ghafouri S.A., Hashemzadeh M., Farahani R.K., Maghsouldoo H., Isakakroudi N. Including 793/B type avian infectious bronchitis vaccine in 1-day-old chicken increased the protection against QX genotype. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1730-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Davelaar F., Kouwenhoven B., Burger A. Occurrence and significance of infectious bronchitis virus variant strains in egg and broiler production in the Netherlands. Vet. Quarterly. 1984;6(3):114–120. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1984.9693924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cavanagh D., Davis P.J. Evolution of avian coronavirus IBV: sequence of the matrix glycoprotein gene and intergenic region of several serotypes. J. General Virol. 1988;69(3):621–629. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-69-3-621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kusters J.G., Niesters H.G., Bleumink-Pluym N.M., Davelaar F.G., Horzinek M.C., Van der Zeijst B.A. Molecular epidemiology of infectious bronchitis virus in the Netherlands. J. General Virol. 1987;68(2):343–352. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-2-343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cook J.K. The classification of new serotypes of infectious bronchitis virus isolated from poultry flocks in Britain between 1981 and 1983. Avian Pathol. 1984;13(4):733–741. doi: 10.1080/03079458408418570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meulemans G., Boschmans M., Decaesstecker M., Van den Berg T., Denis P., Cavanagh D. Epidemiology of infectious bronchitis virus in Belgian broilers: a retrospective study, 1986 to 1995. Avian Pathol. 2001;30(4):411–421. doi: 10.1080/03079450120066412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jackwood M.W. Review of infectious bronchitis virus around the world. Avian Dis. 2012;56(4):634–641. doi: 10.1637/10227-043012-Review.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cavanagh D., Mawditt K., Britton P., Naylor C. Longitudinal field studies of infectious bronchitis virus and avian pneumovirus in broilers using type-specific polymerase chain reactions. Avian Pathol. 1999;28(6):593–605. doi: 10.1080/03079459994399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Worthington K.J., Currie R., Jones R.C. A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction survey of infectious bronchitis virus genotypes in Western Europe from 2002 to 2006. Avian Pathol. 2008;37(3):247–257. doi: 10.1080/03079450801986529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ovchinnikova E.V., Bochkov Y.A., Shcherbakova L.O., Nikonova Z.B., Zinyakov N.G., Elatkin N.P., Mudrak N.S., Borisov A.V., Drygin V.V. Molecular characterization of infectious bronchitis virus isolates from Russia and neighbouring countries: identification of intertypic recombination in the S1 gene. Avian Pathol. 2011;40(5):507–514. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.605782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roussan D., Totanji W., Khawaldeh G. Molecular subtype of infectious bronchitis virus in broiler flocks in Jordan. Poult. Sci. 2008;87(4):661–664. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Awad F., Forrester A., Baylis M., Lemiere S., Ganapathy K. Protection conferred by live infectious bronchitis vaccine viruses against variant Middle East IS/885/00-like and IS/1494/06-like isolates in commercial broiler chicks. Vet. Record Open. 2015;2(2) doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Habibi M., Karimi V., Langeroudi A., Ghafouri S., Hashemzadeh M., Farahani R., Maghsoudloo H., Abdollahi H., Seifouri P. Combination of H120 and 1/96 avian infectious bronchitis virus vaccine strains protect chickens against challenge with IS/1494/06 (variant 2)-like infectious bronchitis virus. Acta Virolo. 2017;61(2):150–160. doi: 10.4149/av_2017_02_04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.MOHAMMADI P., KARIMI V., HASHEMZADEH M., GHALYANCHI L.A., GHAFOURI S., KHALTABADI F.R., MAGHSOUDLOO H., ABDOLLAHI H. 2014. Combination of H120 and 793/B Types of Infectious Bronchitis Virus Vaccine Protects Chickens against Challenge with OX Like Strain of the Virus. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES