Dpp4 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in cardiometabolic disease: Incretin-dependent and -independent function

Abstract

Cardiometabolic disorders including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are among the most severe health problems worldwide. DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors were first developed as anti-diabetic reagents which preserve incretin hormones and promote post-prandial insulin secretion. It's been shown in animal studies that incretin-based therapy has a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease. Recent studies demonstrated novel non-catalytic functions of DPP4 that may play a role in cardiometabolic disease. Although the role of DPP4 inhibition-mediated incretin effects has been well-reviewed, little information of its incretin-independent actions was introduced in cardiometabolic disease. In the current review, we will summarize the catalytic dependent and independent effects of DPP4 inhibition on cardiometabolic disease.

Highlights

• •Discuss the findings from recent large scale clinical trials (EXAMINE and SAVOR-TIMI 53)
• •Summarize the catalytic dependent and independent effects of DPP4 inhibition on cardiometabolic disease
• •Focus on recent evidence linking DPP4 inhibition therapy with cardiovascular disease
• •Provide mechanistic insights into the cardiovascular effect of DPP4

1. Introduction

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), also known as CD26 or adenosine deaminase binding protein (ADBP), is a type-II integral membrane glycoprotein that has recently gained attention owing to its role in the catalytic degradation of incretins. The development of DPP4 inhibitors as a class of anti-diabetic medications has been widely accepted due to their ease of administration and lack of serious side-effects. It's been widely believed that DPP4 inhibition has beneficial effect on cardiovascular diseases [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, recently completed large-scale phase 3 and phase 4 clinical trials (EXAMINE and SAVOR-TIMI 53) showed no significant improvements in primary cardiovascular endpoints in patients treated with DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors compared to those with placebo [7], [8], calling into question the cardiovascular efficacy of these agents. However it must be noted that these trials tested whether enzymatic inhibition of DPP4 is beneficial in the short term, and the importance of any of other non-enzymatic effects was not tested.

In addition to catalytic actions, DPP4 also exerts catalytic independent functions by interacting with a number of ligands such as adenosine deaminase (ADA), fibronectin, caveolin-1, and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus spike protein. The cardiovascular effect of DPP4 was believed to be majorly mediated through an incretin-dependent mechanism. Recent advances in DPP4 non-catalytic activities suggest that the incretin-independent actions of DPP4 may also play an essential role in cardiometabolic disease. However, little information of its incretin-independent actions in cardiometabolic disease was introduced in previous reviews. In this review, we will review the importance of DPP4 catalytic-dependent versus -independent activities in the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic disorders. We will also provide recent clinical trial evidence that have tested its effects in cardiovascular disease.

2. Overview of dipeptidyl peptidases of S9B family

DPP4 belongs to S9B family which consists of several structurally homologous serine peptidases, such as quiescent cell proline dipeptidase (QPP, also called DPP2), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), DPP8, and DPP9 [9]. Proteins in S9B family are able to cleave N-terminal dipeptides from proteins containing proline or alanine in the penultimate position [10]. DPP4 was first identified in 1966 as a glycylproline naphthylamidase [11] and was subsequently purified from rat liver [12] and pig kidney [13].

2.1. Structural and cellular biology of DPP4

Human DPP4 is a 766 amino acid membrane glycoprotein encoded by the human Dpp4 gene localized to chromosome 2q24, adjacent to GLP-1-encoding gene [14]. Sequence comparison reveals a very high degree of sequence conservation. The overall sequence identity is 88% between human and porcine DPP4, and 83% between human and mouse [15]. DPP4 has a large extracellular domain and a short cytoplasmic (AA 1–6) and transmembrane domain (AA7–29). The extracellular domain contains a α/β-hydrolase domain (Gln508-Pro766) and an eight-blade β-propeller domain (Arg54-Asn497) (Fig. 1 ) [16]. The C terminal extracellular domain is responsible for the catalytic activity (catalytic triad: Asp708, His740, and Ser630) and binding to a number of proteins including ADA and matrix proteins [16], [17], [18]. DPP4 functions as a homodimer, relying on broad intermolecule contacts contributed by the hydrolase domain and the extended strands in blade IV of the β-propeller [19]. The catalytic activity of DPP4 depends upon its dimerization state [20], with residues 630, residues 708 and 740 playing a critical role in substrate cleavage [21], [22], [23], [24]. Glycosylation of DPP4 also appears to be important in determining catalytic activity. Glycosylation of Asn-281 in human DPP4 has been proposed to control its assembly [25]. DPP4 can assemble into tetramers on the cell surface and in the circulation by linkage of two homodimers.

Fig. 1.

Structure of DPP4 Extracellular Domain: The extracellular portion of DPP4 is divided into an eight-bladed β-propeller (Arg54-Asn497) and a α/β-hydrolase domain (Gln508-Pro766). The backbone of catalytic triad (Ser630, Asp708, and Hsp740) is shown (Purple: C; Blue: N; Red: O).

2.2. Cellular and tissue distribution of DPP4

DPP4 is widely distributed throughout the body, with particularly high expression exocrine glands and absorptive epithelia. In humans, DPP4 is found at high levels in brush border of the small intestine, kidney proximal tubular cells and glomerular cells, hepatocytes, and activated leukocytes [26]. Significant amounts of DPP4 are also present in blood vessels, particularly in the endothelial cells. Among hematopoietic cells, DPP4 is expressed at the highest level on T cells especially CD4⁺ T cells, and at lower levels in monocytes and dendritic cells. DPP4 expression is increased as monocytes differentiate into macrophages as well as during T cell activation [27]. Indeed DPP4 was described as a T cell activation marker for a number of years. At organ level, DPP4 is highly expressed in solid organs, including kidney, spleen, lung, pancreas and prostate [20].

2.3. Soluble DPP4 in circulation

Soluble DPP4 is a homodimer with a molecular weight range of 210–290 kDa [28], but can form higher molecular weight assemblies migrating as 900-kDa complexes [29]. Soluble DPP4 lacks the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domain with preserved catalytic activity. The major cellular source of circulating DPP4 appears to be bone marrow cells and adipocytes [30], [31]. However, whether sDPP4 is cleaved from the membrane or is secreted is unclear. Studies investigating viral liver infection suggested that sDPP4 is shed from membrane bound DPP4 [32], while other studies suggest a secretory mechanism as evidenced by the fact that sDPP4 was detected in the lumen of secretory granules in pancreatic A cells and exocytic secretory lysosomes of natural killer cells [33], [34].

2.4. Other members of the DPP family

Other members of S9B family include FAP, DPP2, DPP8, and DPP9 [9]. FAP, also known as Seprase, is a 170 kDa membrane glycoprotein with dipeptidylpeptidase and type I collagenase activity [35]. It shares 54% sequence identity with DPP4 [36]. FAP is absent or produced at low levels in normal adult tissues under baseline conditions and is induced in response to inflammatory conditions and tumors. FAP expression levels correlate with prognosis in a number of malignancies and targeting FAP in epithelial-derived solid tumors has been shown to inhibit tumor growth [37]. FAP associates with thin-cap human coronary fibroatheromata and contributes to type I collagen breakdown in fibrous caps. The origin of FAP in plaque interestingly has been shown to derive from smooth muscle cells rather than macrophages and expression correlates with the degree of inflammation [38]. Plasma levels of FAP have been shown to inversely correlate with mortality in patients with ACS, pointing again to a divergent regulation of plasma vs. tissue levels of FAP [39].

DPP2 is widely distributed across a range of mammalian tissues. It is located in intracellular vesicles and can be secreted upon activation [40]. Interestingly it bears no significant nucleotide or amino acid homology with DPP4. Whereas the order of the catalytic amino acids, Ser-Asp-His, is identical in DPP4 and DPP2, the spacing of the catalytic triad is dissimilar, suggesting different substrate specificities. DPP2 knockout mice are embryonically lethal. Conditional knock-down of DPP2 in specific cell types such as neuroendocrine cells (expressing neurogenin 3, NGN3) in the pancreas as well as regions of the hypothalamus and brain stem displayed a phenotype which is in stark contrast to that of DPP4 knockout mice [41], [42]. NGN3-DPP2 knock-down mice had unaltered levels of active GLP-1 but presented with hyperinsulinemia, accompanied by marked impairment of glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, enhanced liver steatosis, and visceral obesity, whereas DPP4 knockout mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance [41], [42]. These findings suggest that dipeptidases DPP2 and DPP4 may have distinct substrate specificities and opposing functional roles.

Human DPP8 and DPP9 share significant homology (62% identity over 820 amino acids), whereas DPP4 is less homologous, e.g. 27% identical amino acids over a span of 677 amino acids with DPP8 [43]. In contrast to DPP4, both DPP8 and DPP9 are expressed in cytoplasma. They share substrate specificity with DPP4 based on in vitro assays utilizing native peptides or peptide pseudosubstrates. However, their physiologically relevant natural substrates and functions in vivo were not known until recently [44]. Utilizing cytosol-wide analysis of proteome in human ovarian cancer lines stably transfected with DPP8 or 9 using terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates approach, a recent study identified more than 29 candidate natural substrates and pathways affected by DPP8/DP9 overexpression. Cleavage of 14 substrates was investigated in vitro; 9/14 substrates for both DPP8 and DPP9 were confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, including two of high confidence, calreticulin and adenylate kinase 2. No unique cleavage was identified for DP8 or DP9 demonstrating similar enzyme specificity and large substrate overlap between these enzymes Adenylate kinase 2 plays key roles in cellular energy and nucleotide homeostasis [44]. While in vitro studies have demonstrated non-enzymatic roles for DPP8 and DPP9 in cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis, the exact physiologic role of these dipeptidases and their in-vivo substrates remain poorly defined [44].

3. Alteration of DPP4 expression in cardiometabolic disorders

3.1. DPP4 expression in the setting of cardiometabolic syndrome

The alteration of DPP4 expression has been studied in a variety of disease conditions including cardiometabolic disease. It has been shown that both expression and catalytic activity of DPP4 were enhanced in diabetes. When in vitro exposed to high glucose, human glomerular endothelial cells displayed an enhanced expression and activity of DPP4 [45], [46]. In line with this finding, circulating DPP4 activity was reported to be increased in patients with type 2 diabetes and positively correlated with HbA1c levels [47], [48]. In diabetic patients, the increase of circulating DPP4 activity results in a reduction of plasma GLP-1 both at fasting and in response to the meal [49]. In addition to circulating DPP4 activity, expression of DPP4 on T cells was reported to increase in patients with T2DM [50]. However, there are also reports suggesting a decrease of circulating DPP4 activity in patients with T2DM [51]. This is probably because most patients included in this study were on anti-diabetic agents, while those medications were reported to reduce circulating DPP4. Several widely-used anti-diabetic agents such as metformin, thiazolidinedione, and pioglitazone were reported to reduce circulating DPP4 [52], [53], [54] and DPP4 on T cells [50].

An enhanced expression of hepatic DPP4 was also reported in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its expression may adversely affect glucose metabolism in this liver disease [55]. In vitro stimulation of HepG2 cells with high glucose increased the expression of DPP4, whereas insulin, fatty acids and cholesterol did not [55]. In addition to cardiometabolic diseases, an altered DPP4 expression has also been reported in many other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis [56], [57], systemic lupus erythematosus [58], major depression [59], and allograft rejection [60].

3.2. Molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of DPP4 expression

The signaling pathways mediated by DPP4 are not completely understood and what is known may vary depending on the cell type, context and the microenvironment.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)− 1α, − 1β, and signal transducer and activator of transcription-α (STAT1α) were identified as transcription factors for DPP4 expression [61], [62], [63]. The expression of DPP4 was reduced by 60–80% by mutations of HNF1 [62]. The promoter of DPP4 contains a consensus GAS (interferon gamma-activated sequence) motif at bp − 35 to − 27, which has been shown to be a binding motif by STAT1α. Administrations of both interferon and retinoic acid result in the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1α, and subsequent nuclear translocation and binding to the GAS motif resulting in DPP4 transcription [61].

The regulation of DPP4 expression is highly dependent on cell types. DPP4 expression on T cells increases during activation, independent of CD4 or CD8 phenotype. IL-12 enhances the translation but not transcription of DPP4 in activated lymphocytes, while TNFα decrease cell surface expression of DPP4, suggesting a regulatory role of IL-12 and TNFα in the translation and probably translocation of DDP4 toward the cell surface [64]. When stimulated by IL-12, IFN-γ-producing T cells expressed higher levels of DPP4 compared with IFN-γ negative cells [27]. Both IFN-γ and retinoic acid could increase DPP4 transcription in malignant B lymphocytes through STAT1α pathway [61]. IFN-γ also induces DPP4 expression on renal epithelial cells [65]. In contrast, DPP4 expression on natural killer cells is induced by IL-2, IL-12, or IL-15, but not IFN-γ [66]. The expression of DPP4 on gingival fibroblasts is shown to be regulated by IL-1α [67]. A recent study demonstrates that IL-1α also contributes to the upregulation of DPP4 expression on epithelial cells and stromal cells in wounded dermis [68].

4. Catalytic and non-catalytic function of DPP4

4.1. Catalytic function

As a member of dipeptidyl peptidase family proteins, DPP4 functions as an N-terminal dipeptidase with a preference for a proline or alanine residue at the penultimate position (i.e., X-Pro-peptide, X means any amino acid). DPP4 thus cleaves X-Pro or X-Ala dipeptides from the N-terminal end of a diverse range of proteins including glucagon-like peptide (GLP) − 1 and − 2, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), CCL5, and CXCL9 can be cleaved by DPP4. The currently available DPP4 inhibitors in clinic suppress the dipeptidase function and preserve the function of its substrates.

Substrates of DPP4 can be categorized into 3 groups: regulatory peptides, chomokines and cytokines, and neuropeptides [48]. The regulatory peptide substrates include GLP-1, GLP-2, GIP, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), and growth-hormone-releasing factor (GHRF). The active form of GLP-1, GLP-1(7–36), could be rapidly converted to an inactive form GLP-1(9–36). Similarly, GLP-2(1–33), GIP(1–42) and GHRF(1–29) can be inactivated by DPP4 and converted to GLP-2(3–33), GIP(3–42), and GHRF(3–29) respectively. The chemokines that can be degraded by DPP4 include regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted (RANTES, also known as CCL5), macrophage derived chemokine (MDC, also known as CCL22), eotaxin (also known as CCL11), monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig, also known as CXCL9), IFN-γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10, also known as CXCL10), interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant (ITAC, also known as CXCL11), and stromal-cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1, also known as CXCL12). DPP4 alters the specificity of MDC on recruited cell types, while cleavage of N-terminal dipeptides inactivates the chemotactic activity of the other chemokines. A recent study suggests DPP4 also truncates a number of cytokines including GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-3, and Epo [69]. Genetic ablation of DPP4 or enzymatic inhibition DPP4 activities by inhibitors enhanced hematopoiesis and bone marrow engraftment in mice after irradiation or chemotherapy. More importantly, truncated GM-CSF could serve as an antagonist for full-length GM-CSF as truncated GM-CSF has higher affinity to its receptor but devoid of bioactivity [69]. The neuropeptide substrates of DPP4 include NPY, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), Peptide YY (PYY), and Substance P. Removal of N-terminal dipeptides by DPP4 alters the receptor subtype specificity of NPY and PYY, reduces activity of substance P and BNP.

4.2. Non-catalytic function

In addition to its well-known peptidase activity, DPP4 also possesses non-catalytic functions via interacting with a range of ligands including adenosine deaminase (ADA), caveolin-1, fibronectin, and CXCR4. By interacting with its ligands, DPP4 plays a role in a variety of processes such as immune regulatory function such as enhancing T-cell activation and functional modulation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs).

DPP4 is expressed on T cells and represents as a marker of T cell activation [70]. Upon activation, both the percentage of DPP4⁺ T cells and the number of molecules per cell are elevated [71]. DPP4 on the cell surface of T cells has been demonstrated to be able to directly provide co-stimulatory signal by binding to ADA [70], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76]. The engagement of ADA by DPP4 enhances T-cell activation by activating CD45 [77]. Activation of DPP4 by anti-DPP4 antibodies prolonged and enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of a variety of proteins activated in response to TCR/CD3 engagement [78]. In addition, ADA-independent non-catalytic activity of DPP4 also plays a role in T cell activation. Yu et al. reported that phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)- and Herpes simplex virus antigen (HSV Ag)-induced T-cell proliferation can be enhanced by soluble DPP4, although DPP4 showed no effect on anti-CD3-induced T cell proliferation. Moreover, both enzyme inactive mutant and ADA non-binding mutant promoted HSV Ag-induced T cell proliferation, indicating this effect of soluble DPP4 is mechanistically independent of both the enzymatic activity and ADA-binding capability of DPP4 [79].

Recent findings showed that DPP4 in a number of species including human, bat, macaque, horse, rabbit, and camel is able to bind spike protein on Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus (MERS-CoV) and mediates its entrance into host cells [69], [80]. More interestingly, there is an overlap between virus-DPP4 and ADA-DPP4 binding interface, indicating a possible manipulation of the host immune response by MERS-CoV through competition for the ADA-recognition site [81].

5. DPP4 and diabetes

5.1. Incretin-dependent function and diabetes

5.1.1. Incretin system

Orally introduced glucose induces a greater insulin response than intravenously administered glucose, a concept known as incretin effect [82], [83]. Incretin hormones include glucagons-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). GLP-1 and GIP are produced by enteroendocrine L cells and K cells, respectively.

As the major types of incretin peptides, one of the primary functions for GLP-1 and GIP is to promote postprandial insulin secretion (Fig. 2 ). Both GLP-1 and GIP increase the transcription and biosynthesis of insulin, promote β-cell proliferation, and suppress β-cell death [84], [85], [86]. GLP-1 is also shown to be able to enhance glucose sensitivity of β-cell and induce glucose competence in previously unresponsive β-cells [87], [88]. Clinical studies confirmed the blood glucose lowering effect of exogenous administration of GLP-1 [89], [90]. In addition to pancreas, GLP-1 also reduces blood sugar by acting on many other organs including liver, brain, adipose tissue, and intestine. GLP-1 decreases glycemia in subjects during a pancreatic clamp, a condition with fixed insulin and glucagons level, suggesting that GLP-1 can suppress glucose production independent of islet hormones [91]. GLP-1 diminishes hepatic glucose production, which also contributes to its anti-hyperglyciemia effect [92]. GLP-1 also acts as a neuropeptide to reduce food intake by inhibiting appetite and regulates muscle glucose utilization and insulin secretion by acting on brain GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) [93], [94], [95]. Furthermore, GLP-1 also suppresses gastric emptying, inhibits adipose inflammation and promotes adipocyte formation by acting on digestive duct and adipose tissue [96], [97], [98].

Fig. 2.

Regulatory function of GLP-1 on glucose metabolism.

In response to meal intake, GLP-1 is released by L cells distributed throughout the gastrointestinal tract (GI Tract). GLP-1 acts on GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) that is expressed in various organs and mediates multiple processes to maintain glucose homeostasis.

Despite plenty benefits, GLP-1/GIP treatment is limited by its short half-life. The half-life of GLP-1 is less than 2 min, while the half-life of GIP is less than 2 min in rodents and 7 min in human [84], [99], [100]. GLP-1(7–36) and GIP(1–42), the active forms of GLP-1 and GIP, are converted into inactive forms: GLP-1(9–36) and GIP(3–42) by a widely expressed enzyme, DPP4. The degradation of GLP-1 and GIP by DPP4 was first reported in early 1990s [101]. An enzymatic removal of N-terminal dipeptides His7-Ala8 from GLP-1 and Tyr1-Ala2 from GIP in plasma was observed in an in vitro experiment, using DPP4 purified from human placenta. Subsequent studies confirmed the metabolism of GLP-1 and GIP mediated by DPP4 did indeed occur in vivo [99], [102]. Accordingly, DPP4 inhibitors emerged as a novel therapeutic approach for type 2 diabetes in clinic [103].

5.1.2. DPP4 inhibitors and diabetes

Incretin response is found impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes and DPP4 enzymatic activity correlates with the degree of glucose homeostasis, suggesting that DPP4 mediated incretin degradation is involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. A significant correlation between DPP4 and HbA1c was observed in Type 2 diabetic subjects who also demonstrated higher DPP4 activity than controls or those with impaired glucose tolerance [47].

DPP4 inhibitors are a class of newly available oral agents for type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or in combination with oral medications such as metformin, glitazones, and sulphonylureas [104]. Treatment with DPP4 inhibitors is usually accompanied with improvement in β cell function: improved homeostasis model assessment beta cell function index (HOMA-β) and fasting proinsulin:insulin ratio [105]. The therapeutic effects of DPP4 inhibitors are based on the ability of DPP4 to degrade the incretin peptides. Inhibition of DPP4 conversely increases the half-life of incretins and contributes to glucose lowering in the post-prandial state [104]. DPP4 inhibitors are only modestly effective as sole glucose-lowering drugs, with a 0.6–0.8% lowering of HbA1C in patients with a starting level around 8% [106]. However, they are being increasingly used in clinic due to the safety of these drugs. The side effect incidence is very low with these agents [105], [107]. The most reported side effects of DPP4 inhibitors in clinical trials include nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and headache [108]. There are currently several DPP4 inhibitors approved or being approved by FDA or EU, which may be broadly divided into two classes based on structure: DPP4 dipeptide structure mimics and non-peptidomimetics. The first class includes Sitagliptin (β-amino acid-based), vildagliptin, and saxagliptin, whereas the non-peptidomimetics includes alogliptin (modified pyrimidinedione) and linagliptin (xanthine-based). The approved DPP4 inhibitors available in the market include: sitagliptin (approved by FDA in 2006), vildagliptin (approved by EU in 2007), saxagliptin (approved by FDA in 2009), linagliptin (approved by FDA in 2011), teneligliptin (approved in Japan 2012), anagliptin (approved in Japan 2012), and alogliptin (approved by FDA in 2013). In addition to those approved drugs, more DPP4 inhibitors including dutogliptin [109] and gemigliptin are under development and awaiting FDA approval.

5.2. Incretin-independent function and diabetes

It has been shown that inflammation is a major contributor to insulin resistance and T2DM [110], [111], [112]. Both innate immunity and adaptive immunity are responsible for the development of metaflammation (a metabolic inflammatory state) [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115]. Given the role of DPP4 in regulating T cell activation, DPP4 may be an important regulator of metaflammation. In addition, the binding of ADA to membrane-bound DPP4 may also promote T cell activation by clearing peri-cellular adenosine. Extracellular adenosine is generated from ATP by cell surface CD39 [116] and CD73. Excessive amount of adenosine suppresses T cell proliferation. Adenosine is degradated by ADA and generates to inosine, a nontoxic product [117]. Loss-of-function mutations in ADA could cause severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in both human and mouse by resulting in the accumulation of adenosine [118], [119], [120]. Jurkat cells with a DPP4 mutant devoid of ADA binding activity are vulnerable to inhibitory effect on proliferation [121], indicating that DPP4 on immune cells facilitates adenosine clearance by binding to ADA (Fig. 3 ). There are two isoforms of ADA, ADA1 and ADA2. ADA1 is ubiquitously expressed and present in cytosol as well as on the cell membrane. The primary role of ADA1 is to degrade adenosine and deoxyadenosine [122]. ADA2 is the predominant isoform found in plasma. Unlike ADA1, ADA2 possesses a much higher costimulatory activity than ADA1 [123] and has a much lower capacity to catalyze adenosine deamination [124].

Fig. 3.

ADA and its role in ATP metabolism.

ATP or ADP is converted into AMP by membrane-bound CD39. AMP is further catalyzed by CD73 and produce adenosine. Adenosine is then degraded by ADA bound to membrane-anchoring DPP4.

DPP4 on T cells may also interact with caveolin-1 present on APCs and initiates a signaling cascade in antigen loaded APCs, resulting in their activation [125], [126]. Upon binding to DPP4, caveolin-1 is phosphorylated, resulting in the phosphorylation of IRAK-1 and eventual NF-kappa B (NFkB) activation [127], [128]. Activated NFkB in turn upregulates CD86 [126]. The interaction between DPP4 and caveolin-1 has been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of arthritis [129]. DPP4 has been reported to bind multiple components of extracellular matrix such as collagen, fibronectin, and the HIV-1 Tat protein [9], [130]. Interactions with these matrix components may play a role in sequestration of DPP4 and allow additional functions such as matrix remodeling, metastasis and chemotaxis.

Our recent work suggests that DPP4 expressed on APCs (including macrophage and dendritic cell) also promotes metaflammation by interacting with ADA [27]. DPP4 levels in adipose tissue inflammatory cells were higher than their counterparts in the circulation. DPP4 expression in visceral adipose tissue increased in obese patients with a positive correlation between DPP4 levels and the degree of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Further evidence suggests that APC-expressing DPP4 promotes T cell proliferation and activation independent of its catalytic activity as catalytic inhibition of DPP4 or addition of exogenous soluble DPP4 did not have such effect. In vitro co-culture experiments suggest that DPP4 on APCs is able to anchor ADA on the cell surface and modulates peri-cellular microenvironment through clearing adenosine [27]. These results suggested an involvement of DPP4 non-catalytic function in adipose inflammation and diabetes.

6. Catalytic-dependent and -independent protective effects of DPP4 inhibition on cardiovascular system

Recently, we and others demonstrated that DPP4 inhibitors confer cardioprotective effects in addition to their anti-glycemia effect. These may include both incretin-dependent and -independent effects.

6.1. Incretin-dependent effect of DPP4 inhibition on cardiovascular disease

By including 18 randomized clinical trials with 4988 patients on DPP4 inhibition therapy and 3546 patients on control treatment (other diabetic treatments or placebo), a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that DPP4 inhibitors are safe from cardiovascular standpoint and have beneficial effects on decreasing adverse cardiovascular events compared to other diabetic medications or placebo [4]. Studies indicate that agonists of GLP-1, a substrate of DPP4, improve the outcome of cardiovascular disease. It has been suggested for some time that receptor for GLP-1 (GLP-1R) is expressed in cardiovascular cells including endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes and coronary smooth muscle cells [131]. GLP-1R belongs to G protein-coupled receptors. The engagement of GLP-1R leads to the activation of adenylate cyclase through stimulatory Gs subunit and subsequent accumulation of cAMP in classically responsive cells such as pancreatic β cells [132], [133]. For example, in β cell, the activation of GLP-1 activates PKA, which subsequently reduces Foxo1 and results in an increase of Foxa2. Foxa2 then increases PDX-1, an transcription factor for insulin [134], [135]. Via a cAMP-dependent pathway, GLP-1R signaling may also induce the activation of PI3K which further increases the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, two antiapoptotic proteins [136].

There is compelling evidence indicating that GLP-1 signaling is involved in the cardioprotective effects of DPP4 inhibition. For example, it has been shown that acute infusion of GLP-1 improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes [137], [138]. Exendin-4, a GLP-1R agonist, was also shown to stimulate proliferation of human coronary artery endothelial cells through eNOS-, PKA-, and PI3K/Akt-dependent pathways [139]. Both DPP4 inhibitor and GLP-1 can increase endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), suggesting a role of GLP-1-dependent pathway in the development of EPCs [140], [141]. Moreover, GLP-1 can increase left ventricular developed pressure and coronary flow in isolated mouse hearts [142]. Further studies confirmed that the protective effect of GLP-1 on endothelial cells is mediated through increasing nitric oxide (NO) production [143]. Those effects could be mediated by in both GLP-1R-dependent and -independent pathways [142].

There are several large scale phase 3 or phase 4 clinical trials to assess the cardiovascular effect of DPP4 inhibitors. Those trials include EXAMINE (EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptIN versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome) on alogliptin, TECOS (Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin) on sitagliptin, the SAVOR-TIMI 53(Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 trial) on saxagliptin, and CAROLINA (Cardiovascular Outcome Study of Linagliptin Versus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes) on linagliptin. Among those trials, EXAMINE and SAVOR-TIMI 53 were recently completed. In the EXAMINE study, 5380 diabetic patients with a recent (< 90 days) myocardial infarction or unstable angina requiring hospitalization were randomized to the treatment of alogliptin or placebo. The patients were followed for a period up to 40 months (a median of 18 months). Alogliptin treatment did not improve the outcome of primary endpoints including death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke [8]. A total of 16,492 diabetic subjects with a history of MI, or documented atherosclerosis, or at least one of hypertension, smoking, or dyslipidemia and HbA1c 6.5–12% were recruited in the trial of SAVOR-TIMI 53 to evaluate the effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes (a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal ischemic stroke). The patients were randomized to saxagliptin group or placebo group. Additional anti-diabetic agents were prescribed throughout the study. Median follow-up time was 2.1 years and maximum was 2.9 years. No improvements in cardiovascular outcomes were observed in saxagliptin treatment group compared to placebo-treated patients. However, hospitalization rate for heart failure was higher in saxagliptin-treated subjects (3.5% vs. 2.8%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51; P = 0.007) [7]. No differences in multiple safety endpoints (such as pancreatitis, cancer, and hypoglycemia) were observed across groups in both trials. These trials suggest that catalytic inhibition of DPP4 is basically safe from cardiovascular standpoint but also does not improve cardiovascular endpoints. There are several reasons for this discrepancy between these clinical trial results and previous reports that DPP4 inhibition possessed beneficial cardiovascular effect. One of the possible reasons is that the follow-up period of those trials is not long enough to observe the difference between treatment group and placebo group (Median follow-up periods were 1.5 years and 2.1 years for EXAMINE and SAVOR-TIMI 53 respectively). Another possible reason is that patients in both groups were receiving other anti-diabetic treatments throughout the study. The possible reason for this neutral effect on cardiovascular endpoints may involve other substrates of DPP4. As mentioned previously, the substrates of DPP4 include a variety of peptides. Those treatments might interfere with or cover the cardiovascular effects of DPP4 inhibition. Many of these substrates, such as SDF-1 and NPY, are implicated in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, it is also possible that catalytic inhibition alone is insufficient to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

6.2. Incretin-independent effect of DPP4 inhibition on cardiovascular disease

DPP4 is expressed in endothelial cells may mediate cardiovascular effects in both GLP-1-dependent or -independent manner, although the functional significance of these effects has not been fully elucidated. By incubating isolated aorta rings with DPP4 enzymatic inhibitor, we provided direct evidence showing DPP4 inhibition relaxes aorta through a GLP-1-independent pathway. Alogliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, but not GLP-1 induces eNOS and Akt phosphorylation (Ser¹¹⁷⁷ and Ser⁴⁷³ respectively) paralleled by a rapid increase in nitric oxide [144]. Inhibition of Src kinase decreased eNOS and Akt phosphorylation in response to alogliptin, in contrast to a lack of any effect on insulin mediated activation of the eNOS-Akt, suggesting that alogliptin mediates vasodilation through Src kinase mediated effects on eNOS-Akt. Whether DPP4 exerts effects directly on eNOS function and the mechanisms by which it exerts these effects remain to be seen [144].

DPP4 has also been shown to assist reconstruction of vasculature by promoting EPCs in a GLP-1-independent pathway. SDF-1α, a well-studied substrate of DPP4, is a regulator of EPCs. By comparing four weeks of sitagliptin versus no additional treatment added to baseline metformin and/or sulfonylurea therapy in 32 diabetic patients, Fadini and coworkers demonstrated patients with DPP4 inhibition had a 2-fold increase of EPCs, 50% increase of SDF-1α [145]. Animal hindlimb ischemia and myocardial infarction studies confirmed the promotive effect of DPP4 inhibition on vasculogenesis through SDF-1 [140], [146]. SDF-1 also mediates the homing and engraftment of progenitor cells in transplantation. Enzymatic inhibition or deletion of DPP4 greatly promotes the homing and engraftment of both mouse and human hematopoietic progenitor cells via a mechanism involving SDF-1 [147], [148], [149], [150]. Further study suggests that truncation of colony-stimulating factors (CSF) such as GM-CSF, G-CSF, erythropoietin, and IL-3 is also involved in DPP4-mediated regulation of progenitor cell homing and engraftment [69]. However, degradation of another substrate NPY(1–36) by DPP4 has been suggested to promote angiogenesis by enhancing the production of NPY(3–36). Both NPY(1–36) and NPY(3–36) have been shown to promote human umbilical endothelial cell migration in an endothelial wound assay [151]. Inhibition of DPP4 activity by a neutralizing antibody suppresses angiogenic activity of NPY(1–36) but not NPY(3–36), suggesting that the production of NPY(3–36) is required for angiogenic activity of NPY [151].

Another important mechanism by which DPP4 inhibition proffer cardiovascular benefits is through a reduction in inflammation. Inflammation plays an etiological role in the development and maintenance of cardiovascular disease [152]. DPP4 is also known as the T-cell antigen CD26. In addition to cardiovascular cells, DPP4 is also highly expressed on many inflammatory cells including T cells and monocytes, and regulates their biological processes and functions [48]. Both enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of DPP4 play an important role in T cell activation. T cell activation can be blocked by enzymatic inhibition of DPP4 [153], [154]. Suppression of dipeptidase activity of DPP4 resulted in a reduced production of cytokines including IL-2, IL-10, IL-12, and IFN-γ by peripheral blood mononuclear cells and T cells [153], [155], [156]. TGF-β1, an immunosuppressive cytokine, was shown to be up-regulated by DPP4 inhibition [155], [157], [158]. T cells transfected with mutant DPP4 devoid of enzymatic activity displayed reduced activation compared with that of transfected with wild-type DPP4 [159]. Consistent with that, the addition of soluble DPP4 promoted the recall antigen-induced proliferation of peripheral blood lymphocytes, while soluble DPP4 mutant without enzymatic activity did not, providing a direct evidence that enzymatic activity of DPP4 is involved in the T cell activation [160]. Other than its enzymatic activity, the non-enzymatic function of DPP4 is also important for T cell activation. DPP4 has been shown to be able to directly bind to several extracellular molecules such as ADA (adenosine deaminase), collagen and fibronectin [48]. Engagement of DPP4 by ADA or antibodies induces co-stimulatory signal and activates T-cell through interacting with CD45, a membrane-linked tyrosine phosphatase [77]. Following the activation of T cells, both the percentage of DPP4⁺ cells and the number of molecules per cell are elevated [71]. DPP4-induced T-cell activation requires TCR/CD3 complex. DPP4 engagement can induce cytotoxicity only in CD3-expressing clones but not CD3-negative clones [161]. Furthermore, down-regulation of CD3 by antibody pre-incubation markedly reduced DPP4-mediated T-cell proliferation [72]. The activation of DPP4 enhances the tyrosine phosphorylation of p56lck and ζ chain in CD3 and induces IL-2 production [77], [162]. In addition, the phosphorylation of a range of intracellular proteins which are involved in the TCR/CD3 signaling, such as p56lck, p59fyn, ZAP-70, MAP kinase, c-Cbl, and phospholipase Cγ was increased and prolonged by the cross-linking of DPP4 [78].

Other than T-cell, DPP4 also regulates the functionality of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) including macrophages and dendritic cells. Soluble DPP4 has been reported to be able to upregulate the expression of CD86 on APCs and thus enhance antigen presentation function [125]. Additional studies demonstrated that DPP4 directly binds caveolin-1 on the cell surface of APCs. The interaction between DPP4 and Caveolin-1 expressed on APCs mediates a signaling cascade in antigen loaded APCs, resulting in their activation [125], [126]. The binding of DPP4 to caveolin-1 induces its phosphorylation, which subsequently activates IRAK-1 and NFκB [126]. Recently, we showed that DPP4 on macrophages and dendritic cells is important for their inflammatory function. By binding ADA, APC-expressing DPP4 provides a microenvironment suitable for T cell proliferation and enhances visceral adipose inflammation [27]. In addition to ADA and caveolin-1, DPP4 has been reported to bind multiple extracellular matrix components including collagen and fibronectin [24], [74], [163]. The interaction between DPP4 and the matrix may play a role in matrix remodeling, metastasis and chemotaxis.

7. Conclusion

The development and application of specific DPP4 inhibitors in clinic reemphasized the importance of DPP4 in both physiological and pathological processes. Recent studies suggest an implication of DPP4 in cardiovascular disease and the non-catalytic activity of DPP4 may also play a role in metabolic dysfunction. However, the details of the involvement in various biological processes and diseases are not fully elucidated. Further studies are required to explore these implications.

Sources of funding

This work was supported by grants from AHA (15SDG25700381 and 13POST17210033) and NSFC (81101553/H1604) to Dr. Zhong.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interests in this paper.