Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 29.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Photonics. 2019 May 23;13(6):365–367. doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0448-9

Cellulose, so much more than paper

Bruno Frka-Petesic 1, Silvia Vignolini 1,*
PMCID: PMC7116276  EMSID: EMS97223  PMID: 33133230

While cellulose is one of the most exploited natural resources on the planet and serves mankind throughout its entire history for construction, clothing and paper, it is only in the last decades that it revealed its full potential as a functional material for photonic applications.13 In nature, cellulose has been long ago employed by the plant realm to provide mechanical strength, stiffness and toughness to biological tissues, but also as the key building blocks of sophisticated tissues with amazing optical properties. In several species, helicoidal architectures of cellulose are observed in the secondary cell wall of different plant tissues and provide incredibly bright colourations to their fruits or leaves.48

In the visible range, cellulose behaves as a transparent, dielectric, birefringent material, yet the value of its refractive index and birefringence strongly depend on its configuration, similarly to many other biopolymers.9,10 The generic term “cellulose” indeed summarises a wide diversity of materials displaying a variety of conformations and thus optical responses. Natural cellulose comes in hierarchical fibrillar form and consists of glucose polymer chains stabilised via hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.11 The native fibres hugely vary in size, crystal structure and crystallinity, depending on their biological origin. Mechanical or chemical treatments of these fibres allows producing mainly two types of cellulose nanomaterials: cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs).1214 As they partially retain the semi-crystalline nature of native cellulose, they both display high values of intrinsic birefringence and refractive index (Δn ≈ 0.074-0.08),9,15 while their high aspect ratio contributes to an even higher extrinsic birefringence when dispersed in a medium of lower optical index such as water (Δn/Φ ≈ 0.12, where Φ is the volume fraction of cellulose).15,16 Native fibres can also be chemically modified and functionalised to produce stable solutions of individual polymer chains, so-called cellulose derivatives, for which the refractive index and birefringence may be smaller,17,18 but remains comparable to soft materials used in photonics. When compared to other biopolymers and proteins, cellulose abundance and high refractive index make it an ideal material to produce next generation optical materials, especially when it comes to sustainability and bio-compatibility. Cellulose nanomaterials are for these reasons an industrial reality: the last decade has seen an increasing number of companies selling nano-cellulose products and research groups working towards the development of cellulose-based optics and photonics have consequently flourished.

Recently, considerable efforts have been provided in the development of CNC-based optical materials. The understanding of their cholesteric liquid crystalline behaviour in suspensions, observed for the first time in the early 90s,19 enabled only nowadays a good control of the optical response of photonic cellulose nanocrystal-based film. In analogy to liquid crystal molecules, these bio-sourced rod-like colloids spontaneously form, above a critical concentration, a chiral nematic structure whereby individual CNCs align along a helicoidally birefringent superstructure. This organisation can be maintained in the dry state upon solvent evaporation, and it gives rise to strong reflection peaks.1 The reflected wavelengths and the scattering properties of these films therefore depend on both the orientation of the cholesteric domains and the value of the pitch in the films.20,21 Recently, these features were found to be determined by the morphology of the mesophase at the kinetic arrest (including cholesteric droplets called tactoids2224) and the subsequent distortion that occurs as the superstructure is vertically compressed upon drying.20,21

While the chiral nature of such blocks is still a matter of debate,25 the chirality of the cellulose nanocrystals films is always left-handed.24 Instead, cellulose derivatives can self-assemble with both handedness.26 Coloured cholesteric films from cellulose derivatives can also be obtained,2729 and in laminates they proved suitable as low-cost and scalable mechano-chromic sensors for pressure mapping as they are compatible with roll-to-roll processing.18,30 On a different note, cellulose derivatives can also be directly patterned at the nanoscale via focused electron beam-induced conversion to fabricate cellulose-based nanostructured materials.31

However, as any biologically sourced material, cellulose nanocrystals can be batch-sensitive as their properties are related to the source and the methodology of extraction. While huge efforts have been done by the community to improve standardisation, significant differences in the characteristics of the material are still found in commercially available sources, and several challenges still need to be addressed for a wide exploitation of this resource into commercial applications.14,32

One of the current challenges in the exploitation of cellulose nanocrystals is controlling their size and shape polydispersity.3 As the phase separation from isotropic to chiral nematic during the self-assembly is connected to the aspect ratio of the nano-crystals,33 the polydispersity causes size fractionation within the assembly, leading to segregation within the films.3436 This issue can be addressed on lab-scale with the use of external fields or by increasing the evaporation times but it is not trivial when it comes to industrial scale up.24 A possible solution to this challenge is represented by moving away from films and control the assembly in confined geometries where various levels of structuration can be achieved at different length scales.37,38 Moreover, the unique combination of chemical, mechanical and optical properties of these biologically sourced building blocks encouraged the community to develop their utilisation in a broad range of applications: from printing and sensing,38 to their use as mesoporous chiral nanotemplates or highly scattering materials, to name just a few.39,40

As for cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibrils have been exploited on large scale and there is a huge literature on the preparation and fabrication of highly optically transparent cellulose nanofibril films (or “nanopapers”),41,42 which are also available commercially for flexible displays, electronic and solar cells, but also for packaging.43 Roll-to-roll compatible production processes have been in fact already established to fabricate films with different optical properties from fully transparent to opaque ones.44,45 The intrinsic high value of anisotropy of cellulose fibrils in terms of refractive index and aspect ratios shape makes them also very suited for highly scattering materials. The optical properties of membranes composed of cellulose nanofibrils can achieve highly bright white, even in thin coatings. This is extremely relevant for industrial applications as commercially available white products, such as paints and sun creams, are typically formulated with high refractive index nanoparticles (e.g. TiO2) as scattering enhancers, which had recently raised serious health and environmental concerns.46

Nature has been a tremendous source of inspiration when it comes to photonics. From light management in photosynthetic systems to control of appearance in living organisms, we can now look at nature not only for optical design strategies, but also for material exploitation: cellulose functionalities can be now engineered for optics and photonics in plants and bacteria. Moreover, as the most abundant bio-polymer on the planet, cellulose represents a truly renewable and biodegradable source for the manufacturing of sustainable products, especially nowadays in the context of growing microplastic pollution concerns worldwide.47,48

Figure 1. Cellulose photonic structure for controlling appearance.

Figure 1

The blue colour visible in the leaves and fruit are obtained with helicoidal cellulose architecture in the cell wall of the epidermal cells of the plants. A- Coloured leaves of Microsorum thailandicum, B- Pollia condensata and C- Margaritaria nobilis. Figure adapted from: A, ref. 5, RSC; B, ref. 6, NAS.

Figure 2. Cellulose-based photonic structures.

Figure 2

A- Coloured flexible film obtained with cellulose nanocrystals. B- Multicolour-printed microfilms of cellulose nanocrystals, the reflected light is circularly polarised so the colour is visible only in the circular left polarisation channel. C,D- Transparent and opaque cellulose nanofiber films and respective SEM in E,F showing that different morphology of the fibres leads to different light transport properties. G- Roll-to-roll photonic cellulose laminate. Figure adapted from: A, ref. 49; B, ref. 38; C–F, ref. 50, under a Creative Commons licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Panel G courtesy of Hsin-Ling Liang and Mélanie Bay.

Panel Figure. Artistic view of the hierarchical structuration of cellulose-based tissues in plants.

Panel Figure

Cellulose is found in the cell wall of every plant, such as in leaves as illustrated in the first section, as it is one of the main building blocks of the cell wall, schematically represented in the second part. Inside the cell wall, cellulose is organized in hierarchical fibres providing mechanical stability to the cell together with other polysaccharides and lignin, schematically represented in the third and fourth parts. In some species, these fibres are organized into cholesteric architectures capable of producing bright colours, as schematically represented in the final part. (Credits: Nicolò Mingolini).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable discussion with the group members and funding from the BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship [BB/K014617/1] and the European Research Council [ERC-2014-STG H2020 639088 and ERC-PoC-2017_790518 PixCell].

Footnotes

Final version freely available online on the Publisher website: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0448-9

References

  • 1.Revol J-F, Godbout DL, Gray DG. Solid self-assembled films of cellulose with chiral nematic order and optically variable properties. J pulp Pap Sci. 1998;24:146–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dumanli AG, et al. Controlled, Bio-inspired Self-Assembly of Cellulose-Based Chiral Reflectors. Adv Opt Mater. 2014;2:646–650. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lagerwall JPF, et al. Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater. 2014;6:e80. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wilts BD, Whitney HM, Glover BJ, Steiner U, Vignolini S. Natural Helicoidal Structures: Morphology, Self-assembly and Optical Properties. Mater Today Proc. 2014;1:177–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Steiner LM, et al. Structural colours in the frond of Microsorum thailandicum . J Roy Soc Interface (in press) 2018 doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2018.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vignolini S, et al. Pointillist structural color in Pollia fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:15712–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210105109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vignolini S, et al. Structural colour from helicoidal cell-wall architecture in fruits of Margaritaria nobilis. J R Soc Interface. 2016;13 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0645. 20160645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vignolini S, Moyroud E, Glover BJ, Steiner U. Analysing photonic structures in plants. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0394. 20130394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hermans PH. Refractive Power and Orientation. Elsevier publishing company, inc; 1946. Contribution to the physics of cellulose fibres A study of Sorption, Density. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greenwood CT, Hourston DJ. Specific refractive index increments of certain polysaccharide systems. Polymer (Guildf) 1975;16:474. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parthasarathi R, et al. Insights into Hydrogen Bonding and Stacking Interactions in Cellulose. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:14191–14202. doi: 10.1021/jp203620x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Foster EJ, et al. Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2018;47:2609–2679. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00895j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, et al. The Shape and Size Distribution of Crystalline Nanoparticles Prepared by Acid Hydrolysis of Native Cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:57–65. doi: 10.1021/bm700769p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED. Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. Langmuir. 2017;33:1583–1598. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y. Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose. 2008;15:425–433. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frka-Petesic B, Sugiyama J, Kimura S, Chanzy H, Maret G. Negative Diamagnetic Anisotropy and Birefringence of Cellulose Nanocrystals. Macromolecules. 2015;48:8844. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Onogi Y, Nishijima Y. Liquid crystalline structure of hydroxypropyl cellulose. Estimation of intrinsic anisotropy of rigid polymer chain. KOBUNSHI RONBUNSHU. 1986;43:223–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kamita G, et al. Biocompatible and Sustainable Optical Strain Sensors for Large-Area Applications. Adv Opt Mater. 2016;4:1950–1954. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int J Biol Macromol. 1992;14:170–172. doi: 10.1016/s0141-8130(05)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Frka-Petesic B, Guidetti G, Kamita G, Vignolini S. Controlling the Photonic Properties of Cholesteric Cellulose Nanocrystal Films with Magnets. Adv Mater. 2017;29 doi: 10.1002/adma.201701469. 1701469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Frka-Petesic B, Kamita G, Guidetti G, Vignolini S. The angular optical response of cellulose nanocrystal films explained by the distortion of the arrested suspension upon drying. (in Prep. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.045601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Revol J-F, et al. Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites; phase separation and magnetic field orientation. Liq Cryst. 1994;16:127–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang P-X, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ. Structure and transformation of tactoids in cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Nat Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11515. 11515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parker RM, et al. The Self-Assembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals: Hierarchical Design of Visual Appearance. Adv Mater. 2018;30 doi: 10.1002/adma.201704477. 1704477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Conley K, Godbout L, Whitehead MA, Van De Ven TGM. Origin of the twist of cellulosic materials. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;135:285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Godinho MH, Gray DG, Pieranski P. Revisiting (hydroxypropyl) cellulose (HPC)/water liquid crystalline system. Liq Cryst. 2017;44:2108–2120. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Werbowyj RS, Gray DG. Ordered Phase Formation in Concentrated Hydroxpropylcellulose Solutions. Macromolecules. 1980;13:69–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Asada T, Toda K, Onogi S. Deformation and Structural Re-formation of Lyotropic Cholesteric Liquid Crystal of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose + Water System. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst. 1981;68:231–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferreira AJ, Almeida PL, Costa I, Brogueira P, Godinho MH. Mechanically activated cholesteric polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Liq Cryst. 2007;34:1269–1273. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liang H-L, et al. Roll-to-roll fabrication of touch-responsive cellulose photonic laminates. Nat Commun (in press) 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07048-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ganner T, et al. Direct-Write Fabrication of Cellulose Nano-Structures via Focused Electron Beam Induced Nanosynthesis. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep32451. 32451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beck S, Méthot M, Bouchard J. General procedure for determining cellulose nanocrystal sulfate half-ester content by conductometric titration. Cellulose. 2015;22:101–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Onsager L. The Effects of Shape on the Interaction of Colloidal Particles. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1949;51:627–659. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dong XM, Kimura T, Revol J-F, Gray DG. Effects of Ionic Strength on the Isotropic−Chiral Nematic Phase Transition of Suspensions of Cellulose Crystallites. Langmuir. 1996;12:2076–2082. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Honorato-Rios C, et al. Fractionation of cellulose nanocrystals: enhancing liquid crystal ordering without promoting gelation. NPG Asia Mater. 2018;10:455–465. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fernandes SN, et al. Mind the Microgap in Iridescent Cellulose Nanocrystal Films. Adv Mater. 2017;29 doi: 10.1002/adma.201603560. 1603560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Parker RM, et al. Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals in a Confined Geometry. ACS Nano. 2016;10:8443–8449. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao TH, et al. Printing of Responsive Photonic Cellulose Nanocrystal Microfilm Arrays. Adv Funct Mater. 2018 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804531. 1804531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shopsowitz KE, Qi H, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ. Free-standing mesoporous silica films with tunable chiral nematic structures. Nature. 2010;468:422–425. doi: 10.1038/nature09540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Caixeiro S, Peruzzo M, Onelli OD, Vignolini S, Sapienza R. Disordered Cellulose-Based Nanostructures for Enhanced Light Scattering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:7885–7890. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b15986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T. Cellulose Nanopaper Structures of High Toughness. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:1579–1585. doi: 10.1021/bm800038n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang W. Nanopapers From Nanochemistry and Nanomanufacturing to Advanced Applications. William Andrew Publishing; 2017. pp. 121–173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Futamura Chemical Co. Ltd. NatureFlex™ packaging films [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kumar V, Elfving A, Koivula H, Bousfield D, Toivakka M. Roll-to-Roll Processed Cellulose Nanofiber Coatings. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55:3603–3613. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Koppolu R, et al. Continuous roll-to-roll coating of cellulose nanocrystals onto paperboard. Cellulose. 2018;25:6055–6069. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bettini S, et al. Food-grade TiO2 impairs intestinal and systemic immune homeostasis, initiates preneoplastic lesions and promotes aberrant crypt development in the rat colon. Sci Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/srep40373. 40373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Browne MA, et al. Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:9175–9179. doi: 10.1021/es201811s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Law KL, Thompson RC. Microplastics in the seas. Science (80-. ) 2014;345:144. doi: 10.1126/science.1254065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guidetti G, Atifi S, Vignolini S, Hamad WY. Flexible Photonic Cellulose Nanocrystal Films. Advanced Materials. 2016;28(45):10042–10047. doi: 10.1002/adma.201603386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Toivonen MS, et al. Anomalous‐Diffusion‐Assisted Brightness in White Cellulose Nanofibril Membranes. Advanced Materials. 2018;30(16):1704050. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES