Abstract
Interstellar carbonaceous dust is mainly formed in the innermost regions of circumstellar envelopes around carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. In these highly chemically stratified regions, atomic and diatomic carbon, along with acetylene are the most abundant species after H2 and CO. In a previous study, we addressed the chemistry of carbon (C and C2) with H2 showing that acetylene and aliphatic species form efficiently in the dust formation region of carbon-rich AGBs whereas aromatics do not. Still, acetylene is known to be a key ingredient in the formation of linear polyacetylenic chains, benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), as shown by previous experiments. However, these experiments have not considered the chemistry of carbon (C and C2) with C2H2.
In this work, by employing a sufficient amount of acetylene, we investigate its gas-phase interaction with atomic and diatomic carbon. We show that the chemistry involved produces linear polyacetylenic chains, benzene and other PAHs, which are observed with high abundances in the early evolutionary phase of planetary nebulae. More importantly, we have found a non-negligible amount of pure and hydrogenated carbon clusters as well as aromatics with aliphatic substitutions, both being a direct consequence of the addition of atomic carbon. The incorporation of alkyl substituents into aromatics can be rationalized by a mechanism involving hydrogen abstraction followed by methyl addition. All the species detected in gas phase are incorporated into the nanometric sized dust analogues, which consist of a complex mixture of sp, sp2 and sp3 hydrocarbons with amorphous morphology.
Keywords: stars: AGB and post-AGB; circumstellar matter; dust, extinction; ISM: lines and bands; methods: laboratory: molecular; methods: laboratory: solid state
1. Introduction
Carbonaceous dust is ubiquitously found in space, from the interstellar medium (ISM) to nova ejecta and circumstellar shells (Chiar et al. 2013). Astronomical observations in the Mid-Infrared (MIR) range reveal the presence of both aromatic and aliphatic dust components. In the diffuse ISM, the 3.4 µm absorption band (assigned to the CH vibrational stretching modes of CH2 and CH3 aliphatic moieties), along with the weaker absorption features at 6.8 and 7.3 µm (which correspond to the CH bending modes of aliphatic groups) have been attributed to hydrogenated amorphous carbon (Pendleton & Allamandola 2002; Dartois et al. 2004). On the other hand, the so-called aromatic infrared emission bands (AIBs) are widely observed in environments of our Galaxy that are submitted to ultraviolet photons (Peeters et al. 2002, 2004). The AIBs, which fall in the spectral range from 3 to 20 µm (main bands at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6 and 11.2 µm) have generally been assigned to polyaromatic carriers that are small enough to be stochastically heated by the absorption of a single ultraviolet (UV) photon, which constitutes the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) hypothesis (Leger & Puget 1984; Allamandola et al. 1985, 1989; Puget & Leger 1989). There are also observational evidences for an evolutionary scenario from aliphatics to aromatics calling for very small grains of mixed aliphatic-aromatic composition both in evolved star environments (Goto et al. 2003; Kwok & Zhang 2011) and in molecular clouds (Pilleri et al. 2015). Overall, these observations call for a better understanding on the formation of PAHs and of carbon dust in general in astrophysical environments.
In our Galaxy, carbon-rich (C-rich) asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are the major sources of carbonaceous dust (Gehrz 1989), thus chemical models have been developed to account for the formation of PAHs and hydrogenated carbon clusters in these environments (e.g. Pascoli & Polleux 2000; Cherchneff 2011). According to observations, acetylene (C2H2) is one of the most abundant molecules in the inner regions of circumstellar envelopes (CSEs) where dust is formed, presenting a relative abundance to H2 of 8 × 10−5 (Fonfría et al. 2008), while carbon atoms are also expected to be highly abundant. Chemical equilibrium calculations predict the concentration of carbon atoms to be 1-2 orders of magnitude below that of C2H2 in the region where carbon molecules are expected to condense into dust (Agúndez et al. 2020).
It is well known that the polymerization of C2H2 gives rise to polyacetylenic chains (Cernicharo 2004), whose formation mechanism has been recently mapped with ALMA in the outer regions of the C-star envelope IRC +10216 (Agúndez et al. 2017). Furthermore, diacetylene (C4H2) has been recently detected in this star through high spectral resolution MIR observations (Fonfría et al. 2018). Acetylene is also believed to play a crucial role in the formation of benzene and PAH compounds (Frenklach & Feigelson 1989). The formation of benzene in evolved stars has been rationalized from experiments of C2H2 pyrolysis by the reaction of two propargyl (C3H3) radicals (Miller & Melius 1992), a mechanism that requires high temperatures and high acetylene concentrations, which are not encountered in the dust nucleation zone of AGB stars. The temperature in the region between 2 and 4 stellar radii is estimated to range from 1500 K to 1000 K whereas a density of acetylene of 107-105 molecules/cm3 has been derived by Fonfría et al. (2008). This abundance for acetylene is in very good agreement with recent model predictions for for C-rich AGB stars (Agúndez et al. 2020).
Another chemical route for the formation of benzene, considering neutral-neutral reactions, and at much lower temperatures than those needed in the combustion theory, has been derived from acetylene discharges. It proceeds mainly by the addition of C2H2 to the C4H3 radical and to a lesser extent by the cyclization of C6H4 (De Bleecker et al. 2006a). Further growth from benzene to PAHs is assumed to take place through the so-called Hydrogen Abstraction Acetylene Addition (HACA) mechanism (Frenklach & Warnatz 1987; Frenklach & Feigelson 1989; Shukla & Koshi 2012; Yang et al. 2016). Recently, a chemical route for the growth of large benzoid-PAHs (comprised only of 6-membered ring structures) has been proposed through the so-called Hydrogen Abstraction Vinylacetylene Addition (HAVA) mechanism (Zhao et al. 2018). Thus, the complementary HACA/HAVA mechanisms might be needed for the molecular growth of PAHs in circumstellar environments.
Several laboratory experiments have dealt with the formation of stardust analogues from acetylene, either in dusty plasmas (Kovačević et al. 2005; Stefanović et al. 2005), in pyrolysis experiments (Jäger et al. 2009; Biennier et al. 2009) or in molecular jets exposed to plasma discharges (Contreras & Salama 2013). However, all of them lack of the addition of atomic carbon and therefore are not suitable to evaluate its impact on the growth of hydrocarbons with implications on, e.g., the formation of hydrocarbons with an odd number of carbon atoms (Cernicharo 2004).
Recently, we have shown that sputtering gas aggregation sources (SGAS) are particularly suited for studying dust formation in the CSE of AGBs (Martínez et al. 2020). In particular, we have demonstrated that the interaction of atomic carbon with molecular hydrogen promotes the formation of non-aromatic molecules, being acetylene one of the main gas phase products. Here, we expand our previous work to investigate the interaction of atomic carbon with acetylene due to its known importance in the formation and growth of hydrocarbons. In order to accelerate the chemistry between carbon and acetylene so as to have access to most of the reaction pathways, as well as to investigate different conditions which would pertain to different regions of the CSE, we have intentionally increased the concentration of acetylene. In addition, our experimental conditions are also of interest for studying the envelopes of C-rich protoplanetary nebulae (PPNe) in which the UV radiation from the central star provokes the photodissociation of acetylene and methane providing a high abundance of carbon initiating a rich chemistry involving C, C2H2, CH4 and other hydrocarbons (Cernicharo 2004).
We have found that, unlike what is commonly observed for dust analogues prepared in pyrolysis experiments or plasmas, a non-negligible amount of the produced material consists of carbon clusters (both pure and hydrogenated) with an odd number of carbon atoms, being a direct consequence of the interaction of atomic carbon with acetylene. Additionally, aromatics with aliphatic substitutions have been observed. We suggest that the formation of alkyl-substituted aromatics proceeds through the formation of CH3 radicals, which is also a consequence of the addition of atomic carbon.
2. Experiments
For the production and analysis of the dust analogues we employed the Stardust machine. The technical details of Stardust can be found elsewhere (Martínez et al. 2018, 2020). The particular experimental setup used in this work is schematically depicted in Fig. 1. A pictorial view of the CSE region simulated by our experimental setup can be found in Martínez et al. (2020). The base pressure of the system is in the 10−10 mbar range and the pressure during the production of the analogues at different positions of the machine is also indicated in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.
Scheme of the experimental setup used for the analog production and analysis. The pressure at each UHV chamber during the formation of the analogues is indicated.
Dust analogues were produced with a scaled-up Multiple Ion Cluster Source (MICS) (Martínez et al. 2012), a special type of sputtering gas aggregation source (SGAS), working in UHV conditions (Haberland et al. 1991). Atomic carbon was delivered by magnetron sputtering of a 2-inch graphite target (99.95 % purity) using Ar as sputtering gas with a flow rate of 150 sccm. The sputtered atoms coalesce inside the aggregation zone (aggregation length, i.e., distance from the magnetron target to the exit nozzle: 374 mm). C2H2 (purity ≥ 99.6 %, diluted in acetone) was injected in the aggregation zone of the MICS through a lateral entrance at constant flow rates of 0, 4×10−4, 0.15 and 1 sccm. The DC magnetron is regulated in current and 0.2 A (corresponding to 100 W) were applied.
Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) was performed inside the aggregation zone (at OES position in Fig. 1) and the light emitted by the sputtering plasma at a distance of around 1 cm from the magnetron target was collected through a fused silica window and a fused silica optical fibre. A 193 mm focal length, motorized Czerny-Turner spectrograph (Andor, model Shamrock SR-193-i-A) equipped with a CCD camera (iDus DU420A-BVF) was employed. Two diffraction gratings with 1200 and 1800 grooves/mm, installed in a movable turret, provide spectral ranges of 300-1200 nm and 200-950 nm, respectively, and nominal spectral resolutions of 0.22 nm and 0.15 nm, respectively (for an input slit width of 20 µm). The relative spectral efficiencies of the spectroscopic equipment were quantified for both diffraction gratings with a calibrated tungsten lamp.
Mass spectrometry was used for in-situ analysis of the gaseous species produced during the production of the dust analogues. This was performed at positions labelled as QMS1 and QMS2 in Fig. 1. At QMS1 a quadrupole mass spectrometer (PrismaPlus, Pfeiffer) with a mass range of 0-100 amu and a Faraday cup detector was used. At QMS2, a Pfeiffer HiQuad QMG 700 with QMA 400 mass spectrometer (mass range of 0 to 512 amu) equipped with a CP 400 ion counter preamplifier was used, which enables a higher sensitivity. The pressure in the UHV chamber at position QMS1 during the analogue production precludes the use of a more sensitive Secondary Electron Multiplier (SEM) detector. Specific chemical compounds have been tentatively assigned from mass spectra considering the fragmentation pattern by electron impact ionization available at the NIST database (NIST Mass Spectrometry Data Center 2020).
Morphological characterization of the analogues was performed ex-situ by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). In both cases the deposits were collected through Sample entry 1 of Fig 1. For the AFM measurements the dust analogues were collected on SiOx substrates whereas carbon grids were employed for TEM. The AFM measurements were carried out with Cervantes AFM System equipped with the Dulcinea electronics from Nanotec Electronica S.L. All images were recorded and analyzed using the WSxM software (Horcas et al. 2007). TEM was performed with a FEI-TITAN X-FEG transmission electron microscope used in scanning mode (STEM) and operated at 300 kV and at 120 kV. The images were acquired using a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector. The microscope was equipped with a monochromator, Gatan Energy Filter Tridiem 866 ERS, a spherical aberration corrector (CEOS) for the electron probe (which allows for an effective spatial resolution of 0.08 nm) and an energy dispersive X-ray detector for EDS analysis.
The composition of the dust analogues was investigated in-situ by infrared spectroscopy in transmission geometry. The dust analogues were deposited on KBr substrates and transferred to a separated UHV chamber by means of an UHV suitcase (P < 5×10−9 mbar). This protocol ensures that the inspected deposits were not air-contaminated. A VERTEX 70 V (Bruker) instrument was employed and the complete optical path was kept in vacuum. The spectral resolution was set to 2 cm−1 and 256 scans were coadded. A liquid nitrogen cooled Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) detector was used. For the analysis of the IR spectra, spectral deconvolution was performed when peaks were not resolved due to overlapping of IR bands.
Finally, the molecular composition of the analogues was investigated ex-situ by laser desorption/ionization mass-spectrometry (LDI-MS) employing the AROMA (Aromatic Research of Organics with Molecular Analyzer) setup (Sabbah et al. 2017) using the so-called laser desorption-laser ionization (L2MS) scheme in which desorption and ionization are separated in time and space and performed with two different lasers. The desorption step was performed with the fundamental mode of a Nd:YAG laser (λ = 1064 nm) whereas the ionization step was performed employing the fourth harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser (λ = 266 nm). This scheme is particularly sensitive to PAHs due to the wavelength of the ionization laser. The ions generated are stored and thermalized in a linear quadrupole ion trap and subsequently monitored by time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
3. Results
3.1. Gas-phase molecules produced during the formation of the dust analogues
Fig. 2a shows the optical emission spectra during the dust analogue formation inside the aggregation zone of the MICS in the spectral regions corresponding to the CH (A-X) band, the C2 Swan band (d3Πg-a3Πu) and the Hα line of the Balmer series for the different C2H2 flow rates employed. When no C2H2 was injected inside the aggregation zone, the molecular C2 Swan band is clearly observed. Since the sputtering of graphite in SGAS produces mainly atomic carbon, we rationalize that C2 is formed via the three body reaction C + C + Ar → C2 + Ar (Martínez et al. 2020), which involves Ar atoms from the sputtering gas used.
Figure 2.
a) Optical emission spectra in the spectral regions of the CH (A-X) band, C2 Swan band (D3Πg-a3Πu) and the Hα line of the Balmer series for the different C2H2 flow rates employed. The flow rates are indicated in the figure. The spectra are vertically shifted for clarity. b) Evolution of the CH, C2 and Hα line intensities with the C2H2 flow rate. The wavelength employed for each line is indicated in the figure.
As C2H2 is injected, the C2 Swan band vanishes and a clear signature of the presence of atomic hydrogen is observed through the appearance of the Hα line. This suggests that the excited C2 is consumed to some extent in the reaction C2 + C2H2 → C4H + H, which is known to be rapid even at low temperatures (Canosa et al. 2007; Daugey et al. 2008). In addition, as C2H2 is injected, it can directly react with atomic carbon through, e.g., C + C2H2 → C3H + H and/or C + C2H2 → C3 + H2 (Clary et al. 2002), which diminishes the amount of atomic carbon available to form C2 and releases atomic hydrogen as well. Furthermore, emission from the CH radical is detected for the two highest flow rates investigated. We have already shown that this radical can be formed by the interaction of atomic carbon with H2 at very low densities, even with the residual H2 in the UHV chamber (Martínez et al. 2020). The concurrent detection of the Hα line suggests an excess of atomic hydrogen, which, if it is not participating in further chemical reactions, will recombine into H2 by three-body reactions, thus increasing the overall H2 density. The bimolecular reaction C + H2 → CH + H is highly endothermic unless atomic carbon is electronically excited (Sato et al. 1998). The reaction of C with vibrationally excited H2 could help in overcoming the barrier energy but under the physical conditions of the Stardust machine we do not expect high abundance of H2 in the v=1, 2 vibrational levels. Therefore, CH is most probably formed by a three body reaction involving Ar (sputtering gas) as third body (C + H + Ar → CH + Ar), though we cannot completely rule out a contribution from the dissociation of C2H2 in the magnetron plasma. From gas flow calculations, we have estimated that around 2% of the injected acetylene reaches the magnetron and is therefore susceptible to dissociate by electron impact.
In order to investigate the molecular species that are formed during the dust analogue production, we have performed in-situ mass spectrometry at position QMS1 in Fig. 1. Once at this position, no further growth of the analogues takes place. When the production of the analogues is carried out in the absence of C2H2, only Ar, which is used as sputtering gas, and the residual gases in the chamber (H2, H2O and CO) were detected (Fig. 3a). The peak at m/z = 80 corresponds to the formation of Ar dimers (Ar2) during the gas expansion through the nozzle of the MICS.
Figure 3.
a) In-situ mass spectra at position QMS1 in Fig. 1 for the different C2H2 flow rates employed (indicated in the figure). The peaks labelled by a star correspond to the acetone impurity of the C2H2 gas. The curves have been shifted for clarity. b) and c) Expanded regions for the 1 sccm flow rate. d) In-situ gas phase detection of m/z = 2, 18, 26, 28, 43, 44, 50, 74, 76 and 78, which are indicated in the figure along with the assignment to the main contributing chemical species for the 1 sccm flow rate. The dashed vertical lines indicate the switching on and off of the magnetron. e) In-situ mass spectra for the 1 sccm C2H2 flow rate at position QMS2 in Fig.1. Peaks labeled in red are assigned to polyacetylenic chains, in blue to aromatic molecules and in green to aliphatics. In a) C2nH2 label mass peaks associated to the fragmentation of polyacetylenic chains by electron impact in the quadrupole.
On the contrary, when C2H2 is injected we detected diacetylene (C4H2) and for the highest flow rates employed also triacetylene (C6H2) (Fig. 3a). The polymerization of acetylene to larger linear polyacetylenic chains is known to occur through the reaction with the ethynil radical (C2H) via C2H + C2nH2 → C2n+2H2 + H. More interestingly, for the highest C2H2 flow rate we have clearly detected C6H4 and C6H6 (Fig. 3c). C6H4 has been suggested to be involved in the formation of benzene through a cyclization mechanism (De Bleecker et al. 2006a) and the concomitant detection of both species in our experiments seems to support this mechanism.
As shown in Fig. 3d, the formation of all the molecules detected by mass spectrometry is accompanied with the consumption of C2H2 once atomic carbon is released from the magnetron target. In addition, we have observed the production of H2 (m/z = 2). Atomic hydrogen is produced in high amounts by the polymerization reactions of C2H2, thus it is available to participating in further chemical reactions, including its recombination to molecular hydrogen by three body reactions.
The signals corresponding to H2O (m/z = 18) and CO2 (m/z = 44) were stable, indicating that they were not involved in the chemical reactions. However, we observed slight changes in the signal associated to the main fragment of acetone (m/z = 43), which is present as an impurity in the C2H2 (concentration lower than 0.3 %), along with a slight increase in the amount of CO (m/z = 28). Nevertheless, we have not detected any other gas-phase O-bearing molecule, implying that the acetone impurity in acetylene is only weakly (if any) contributing to the chemistry involved in the formation of the analogues. Moreover, the reaction between C and H2O has a very large barrier of ≃20000 K (Mayer et al. 1967) and that of C with CO2 has been measured at 300 K with a rate below 10−15 (Husain & Young 1975); thus, the formation of O-bearing species is very unlikely in our experiments.
Higher sensitivity gas-phase mass spectrometry was performed at position QMS2 in Fig. 1 for the highest C2H2 flow rate (Fig. 3e). The differences observed in the relative intensities among C6H2, C6H4, C6H6 and Ar2 in Figures 3 (c) and (e) are due to the different sensitivity of the QMS as well as the different pressures at locations QMS1 and QMS2. Concerning polyacetylenic chains, we detected up to C8H2. Furthermore, apart from C6H6, we observed the formation of larger aromatic molecules including naphthalene (C10H8), ace-naphthylene (C12H8) and biphenyl/ethenylnaphthalene (C12H10). These molecules are important for the growth of larger PAHs through different mechanisms including the well-known HACA mechanism (Shukla & Koshi 2012). We have also detected phenylacetylene (C8H6) which is a stable intermediate in the growth of naphthalene from benzene through the HACA mechanism. Interestingly, unlike what is observed in acetylene pyrolysis (Shukla & Koshi 2012) or acetylene discharges (Deschenaux et al. 1999) we have detected aromatic molecules with aliphatic substitutions (toluene (C7H8), styrene (C8H8) and xylene/ethylbenzene (C8H10)). The HACA mechanism does not explain the formation of aromatic compounds with aliphatic substituents. However, the addition of atomic carbon and its interaction with molecular hydrogen (both residual in the UHV system and formed by recombination of the released atomic hydrogen) promotes the formation of alkyl radicals, which open up chemical routes for the formation of alkyl-substituted aromatics (see Sec. 4).
Finally, we detected a number of hydrogenated carbon clusters (HC-clusters) of aliphatic nature with odd number of carbon atoms from C5 to C11, again differing from what is found in acetylene discharges/pyrolysis in which predominantly molecules with even number of carbon atoms are formed (see Fig. 3e). The apparent absence of C7 HC-clusters might be due to a blurring of the signal by the peaks associated to toluene and its main fragment (m/z = 91/92). For C3 clusters, it is the Ar signal which precludes its detection. The production of these C-clusters is a clear signature of the interaction of atomic carbon with C2H2. The reaction of C and C2H2 is known to be fast, yielding C3 and/or C3H (Liao & Herbst 1995; Clary et al. 2002). Analogous reactions of C with larger polyacetylenic chains are as well an efficient way to produce hydrocarbons with an odd number of carbon atoms in chemical environments where C and C2H2 are abundant (Cernicharo 2004). In addition, the reaction of C with other large hydrocarbons is also known to occur very fast and without barrier (Haider & Husain 1992; Liao & Herbst 1995; Husain & X. Ioannou 1997).
Overall, the results concerning in-situ mass spectrometry evidence the formation of three different families of gas-phase chemical compounds, namely, polyacetylenic chains, aromatic species, either pure and with aliphatic substitutions, as well as C- and HC-clusters of aliphatic nature. The identified masses are listed in Table 1 red along with their tentative assignments to chemical compounds (NIST Mass Spectrometry Data Center 2020). A detailed description of the possible formation mechanisms is provided in Sec. 4.
Table 1. Chemical species detected in the gas phase by mass spectrometry during the production of the dust analogues along with its tentative assignment to specific compounds.
m/z | Chemical formula | Compound |
---|---|---|
Polyacetilenic chains | ||
26 | C2H2 | acetylene |
50 | C4H2 | diacetylene |
74 | C6H2 | triacetylene |
98 | C8H2 | octatetrayne |
| ||
Aromatics | ||
78 | C6H6 | benzene |
91/92 | C7H8 | toluene |
102 | C8H6 | phenylacetylene |
104 | C8H8 | styrene |
106 | C8H10 | xylene/ethylbenzene |
128 | C10H8 | naphthalene |
152 | C12H8 | acenaphthylene |
153/154 | C12H10 | biphenyl/vinylnaphthalene |
| ||
Aliphatics | ||
62-68 | C5Hn | C5-clusters |
76 | C6H4 | 3-hexene-1,5-diyne |
115-123 | C9Hn | C9-clusters |
140-144 | C11Hn | C11-clusters |
3.2. Morphology of the dust analogues
Apart from the gas phase species, most of the material produced during the formation of the dust analogues consists of particles with diameters in the nanometer range (Fig. 4). Due to the low kinetic energy of the particles produced using gas aggregation sources, the particles soft land on the substrate and thus retain the gas phase morphology and structure.
Figure 4.
Morphology of the dust analogues without (top) and with (bottom) C2H2 injection (flow rate of 1 sccm). (a,b) AFM images. (c,d) Size distribution extracted from AFM images. The blue lines correspond to the fitting to log-normal distributions. (e-f) TEM images.
Fig. 4a and b show typical AFM images of the dust analogues when no C2H2 was injected in the aggregation zone (pure C particles) and for a C2H2 flow rate of 1 sccm, respectively. In both cases nanoparticles (NPs) are observed with mean NP diameters of 9.3 nm and 7.0 nm for pure C NP and for a C2H2 flow rate of 1 sccm, respectively. However, a broader size distribution is obtained when injecting C2H2 (see Fig. 4 c and d). Moreover, the production rate increased enormously when C2H2 was injected (by a factor around of 350 in terms of collected NPs/µm2s), which evidences the interaction of atomic C with C2H2, resulting in a manifest acceleration of the chemistry.
The TEM analysis of the NPs revealed the formation of amorphous NPs irrespective of the injection of C2H2 (Fig. 4e-f). The main difference consists in the shape of the particles. Pure C NPs present a well-defined round shape whereas those formed after C2H2 injection tend to agglomerate. This agglomeration is observed in the AFM images as well, but it is better seen in the TEM images. Diffusion of the NPs once deposited on the substrates is not expected, thus the agglomerates might be already formed in the gas-phase.
3.3. Composition of the dust analogues
For the highest C2H2 flow rate (1 sccm), we measured the IR spectrum of the dust analogues (Fig. 5). The IR spectrum reveals that the sample consists in a complex mixture of hydrocarbons with sp, sp2 and sp3 carbon hybridizations, thus the gas-phase products detected by mass spectrometry are incorporated into the solid dust analogues. The observed infrared bands are listed in Table 2 along with their tentative assignments.
Figure 5.
a) IR spectrum of the dust analogue. b) Spectral deconvolution in the range 1500-1750 cm−1. For the deconvolution, a baseline has been subtracted to remove the contribution from the very broad amorphous carbon band.
Table 2. Vibrational band assignments for the IR bands with optical depth higher than 0.0025.
ν | λ | Assignment | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|
cm−1 | µm | ||
3322 | 3.01 | sp alkyne CH str. | sh |
3300 | 3.03 | sp alkyne CH str. | s |
3100 | 3.23 | sp2 arom./olef. CH str. | sh |
3085 | 3.24 | sp2 arom./olef. CH str. | sh |
3056 | 3.27 | sp2 arom./olef. CH str. | m |
3029 | 3.30 | sp2 arom./olef. CH str. | m |
2973 | 3.36 | sp3 asym. CH3 str. | m-s |
2925 | 3.42 | sp3 asym. CH2 str. | s |
2870 | 3.48 | sp3 sym. CH3 str. | sh |
2845 | 3.51 | sp3 sym. CH2 str. | sh |
2200 | 4.55 | sp alkyne CC str. (conjugated alkynes) | w |
2105 | 4.75 | sp alkyne CC str | w |
1938 | 5.16 | Combination of out-of-plane and in-plane CH bend. modes | w |
1800-1000 | 5.56-10.00 | Amorphous carbon (π-band) | m-s |
1711 | 5.84 | Carbonyl CO str. | w |
1686 | 5.93 | Carbonyl CO str. | w |
1630 | 6.13 | sp2 olef. CC str. | sh |
1600 | 6.25 | sp2 arom. CC str. | m-s |
1578 | 6.34 | sp2 arom. CC str. | sh |
1492 | 6.70 | sp2 arom. CC str. | w |
1445 | 6.92 | sp3 CH3 asym. bend. / sp3 CH2 sci. | m-s |
1437 | 6.96 | sp2 arom. CC str | sh |
1379 | 7.25 | sp3 CH3 sym. bend. | sh |
1369 | 7.30 | sp3 CH3 sym. bend. | w-m |
1074 | 9.31 | sp2 arom. CH in-plane bend. / sp2 olef. CH2 rock. | w |
1029 | 9.72 | sp2 arom. CH in-plane bend. | w |
988 | 10.12 | sp2 olef. CH wag. | w |
968 | 10.33 | sp3 CH3 rock. | w |
910 | 10.99 | sp2 olef. CH wag. | sh |
890 | 11.24 | sp2 arom. CH out-of-plane bend. (solo) | m |
843 | 11.86 | sp2 arom. CH out-of-plane bend. (duo) | m |
776 | 12.89 | sp2 arom. CH out-of-plane bend. (trio) | sh |
756 | 13.23 | sp2 arom. CH out-of-plane bend. (quartet) | m-s |
700 | 14.29 | sp2 CH out-of-plane bend. | m |
640 | 15.63 | sp2 arom. CCC in-plane bend. | m |
Note—arom: aromatics; olef: olefins. The vibrational modes are abbreviated as str: stretching; bend: bending; sci: scissoring; rock: rocking; wag: wagging. Relative intensities are labelled as s: strong; m: medium; w: weak; sh: shoulder.
The presence of sp carbon is evidenced by the absorption bands at 3322 and 3300 cm−1 corresponding to the ≡C-H stretching modes, and by the band at 2105 cm−1, which corresponds to the -C≡C- stretching mode of monosubstituted acetylene. In addition, a second -C≡C-stretching mode is observed at 2200 cm−1 which is ascribed to the stretching mode of conjugated triple bonds -C≡C-C≡C- (Socrates 2001). This band is also found in dust from acetylene plasmas (Stoykov et al. 2001) but is often too weak to be observed (Kovačević et al. 2005; Stefanović et al. 2005). In addition, it is not commonly observed in dust analogues from acetylene pyrol-ysis (Biennier et al. 2009). The fact that we observe this band might be related to the addition of atomic carbon and the formation of C2, which in the end increases the formation of linear polyacetylenic chains via the C4H radical route (see Sec. 4).
On the other hand, numerous bands indicate the presence of sp3 carbon and aliphatic moieties. The bands at 1369 cm−1, 1379 cm−1 and 1445 cm−1, assigned to the CH3 symmetric bending and CH3 asymmetric bending / CH2 scissoring modes, respectively (see Table 2), are a clear signature of alkyl moieties. These bands are accompanied by the bands in the region between 3000 cm−1 and 2800 cm−1, which correspond to the CH2 and CH3 stretching modes. Moreover, the band at 968 cm−1 is ascribed to the CH3 rocking mode.
Concerning sp2 carbon, the bands at 1600 cm−1, 1578 cm−1, 1492 cm−1 and 1437 cm−1 reveal the presence of aromatics in the dust analogues. All are assigned to aromatic C=C stretching modes. In the case of alkyl substituted aromatics, the band at 1578 cm−1 is usually a shoulder of that at 1600 cm−1, as is our case. Moreover, the band at 1492 cm−1 is intense for substituted aromatics (Socrates 2001). These results are consistent with the detection of aromatics with aliphatic substituents by mass spectrometry and reveal that the aromatic compounds incorporated into the dust analogues are not only pure but present aliphatic substituents as well. We note that a similar result has been recently obtained by Gavilan et al. (2020) during the formation of dust analogues using small PAHs as precursors in a molecular jet exposed to an electrical discharge.
Other bands related to the aromatic compounds incorporated into the dust analogues are the CH out-of-plane bending modes. The different bands observed at 890 cm−1, 843 cm−1, 776 cm−1 and 756 cm−1 are related to different number of peripheral adjacent H atoms (solo, duo, trio and quartet, respectively) (Hony et al. 2001; Carpentier et al. 2012) and are characteristic of PAHs though insensitive to PAH substitution. However, the band at 700 cm−1 can be assigned to CH out-of-plane bending mode of substituted benzenes (Socrates 2001). Finally, the band at 640 cm−1 is attributed to the CCC in plane bending of aromatic compounds (Gadallah et al. 2012) and the combination band at 1938 cm−1 is ascribed to the combination of out-of-plane and in-plane CH bending modes (combination and overtone bands in the spectral region 2000-1700 cm−1 are characteristic of aromatic compounds).
Apart from aromatic compounds, there are also bands related to olefinic sp2 carbon. The sp2 CH stretching bands in the region 3100-3000 cm−1 are due to both aromatic and olefinic sp2 carbon, but the shoulder at 1630 cm−1 is unambiguously assigned to the C=C stretching modes of olefinic compounds (Fig. 5b) (Socrates 2001; Gavilan et al. 2017). The presence of olefinic moieties is further confirmed by the characteristic wagging modes of olefins at 988 cm−1 and 910 cm−1 (Socrates 2001). The band at 1074 cm−1 might be due to the CH2 rocking mode characteristic of vinyl groups, in accordance with the observation of styrene (and maybe also vinylnaphthalene) by mass spectrometry, though the aromatic inplane CH bending modes overlap in this region.
The broad band that appears in the 1800-1000 cm−1 region is characteristic of amorphous carbon (aC) and its intensity is related to the relative amount of sp2 to sp3 carbon hydridization (Ferrari et al. 2003; Rodil 2005). Its presence in the IR spectrum is consistent with the amorphous morphology observed by TEM and suggests that part of the dust analogues is made of aC material.
Finally, weak C=O carbonyl stretching bands are observed which we consider as related to the acetone impurity in the C2H2 bottle since the base pressure of the Stardust machine is 10−10 mbar and the sample was transferred to the IR UHV chamber by means of an UHV suitcase at a pressure lower than 5 × 10−9 mbar.
In addition, we have tested the stability of the analogues after air exposure and we have observed that they present a high reactivity (Fig. 6), whereas we did not observe any significant change in the IR spectrum of the analogues after 24 hours in UHV. Carbonaceous materials produced from unsaturated precursors are known to react swiftly with oxygen, leading to the formation of C-O-C moieties. Mainly, we have observed the incorporation of oxygen through the increase of the carbonyl C=O stretching modes and through the appearance and growth of a band at 1250 cm−1, assigned to the C-O-C stretching mode. In addition we have observed a reduction in the sp carbon content, which is evident by the decrease of the sp CH stretching modes (3300 cm−1) and of the -C≡C- stretching mode of conjugated alkynes (2200 cm−1). An increase in sp3 aliphatic moieties was also observed whereas the sp2 CH stretching modes remain unaltered (see e.g. the normalized optical depth (OD) for the bands at 2925 cm−1 and at 3056 cm−1 in Fig. 6b). Further changes in the 1000-600 cm−1 region can also be observed, though difficult to interpret. Anyhow, these results evidence the extreme importance of both working in ultra-clean environments (such as UHV conditions) and of in-situ characterizing the dust analogues produced from acetylene.
Figure 6.
a) IR spectra of the dust analogues in UHV and after air exposure for 15 min and 24 hours. The spectra have been vertically shifted for clarity. b) Temporal evolution of the normalized optical depth for some selected IR bands after exposing to air the dust analogue.
Albeit the tested chemical reactivity of the dust analogues towards atmospheric air, we have also performed ex-situ laser desorption/ionization mass-spectrometry (LDI-MS) of the dust analogue produced with a C2H2 flow rate of 1 sccm (Fig. 7), using the AROMA setup (Sabbah et al. 2017).The results are not quantitative in terms of the relative amount of the observed compounds because of the known chemical evolution of the analogues after air exposure, but they provide additional information on the chemical composition.
Figure 7.
a) Ex-situ laser desorption/ionization mass-spectrometry (LDI-MS) of the dust analogue using the AROMA setup (Sabbah et al. 2017). b) Double Bond Equivalent (DBE) analysis. The stacked bar graph in the inset summarizes the composition of each molecular family.
Linear polyacetylenic chains (in cationic form) were detected up to C8H2, which is somehow surprising due to the high volatility of these compounds and indicates that these species are trapped inside the dust particles and released by laser desorption. Other volatile species detected by in-situ mass spectrometry, such as benzene or toluene, were not detected by LDI-MS despite the high sensitivity of the technique to aromatics (Sabbah et al. 2017). C6H4 could be identified, which was also detected by in-situ mass spectrometry and is an important molecule for the formation of benzene. Moreover, C2H+ 2 and C3H+ 3 are believed to be produced during the laser desorption stage from the common C3H2 precursor (cf. supplementary material in Martínez et al. 2020).
On the other hand, C- and HC-clusters with carbon atoms from 5 to 20 dominate the mass spectrum, being C5H and C11 particularly abundant. Relatively large aromatics are also present in the dust analogue from C12H8 (acenaphthylene) to C20H12. Finally, the peaks assigned to C3HO and C7HO evidence oxidation of the sample likely due to air exposure. The results from LDI-MS are summarized in Fig. 7b by using a Double Bond Equivalent (DBE) analysis. Briefly, in the case of hydrocarbons, DBE can be defined as the sum of the number of double bonds involving carbon plus the number of rings for a particular species. A description of the DBE analysis can be found in, e.g, Sabbah et al. (2017), Gavilan et al. (2020) and in the Supplementary Information of Martínez et al. (2020). Three molecular families, namely aromatics, HC- and C-clusters, were considered and their relative intensities in terms of summed peak intensities are shown.
4. Discussion
4.1. Formation of polyacetylenic chains (C2nH2)
Linear polyacetylenic chains, C2nH2, are observed in the outer layers around C-rich stars and their formation involves the ethynyl radical (C2H), which is formed by the photodissociation of C2H2 in the outer layers of the CSE and triggers the chemistry of linear polyacetylenic chains (Cernicharo 2004; Agúndez et al. 2017). Once the C2H radical is formed, the formation of polyacetylenes proceeds mainly through reactions of the type
(R1) |
which are assumed to occur fast at low temperatures (see scheme in Fig. 8) (Chastaing et al. 1998; Agúndez et al. 2017). A second important chemical route for the formation of triacetylene and larger polyacetylenic chains involves the radical C4H through reactions of the type (Berteloite et al. 2010; Agúndez et al. 2017)
(R2) |
Figure 8.
Reaction pathway for the formation of linear polyacetylenic chains.
Besides the photodissociation of diacetylene, the C4H radical can be efficiently formed by the interaction with dicarbon through the bimolecular reaction
(R3) |
In CSEs around C-rich AGB stars, the interaction of C2H2 with energetic radiation can lead to dissociation but also to ionization. Taking into account that ionneutral reactions are usually faster than neutral-neutral reactions (e.g., the rate constant of C2H+ 2 + C2H2 → C4H+ 2 + H2 is 2.5-5 times higher than that of C2H + C2H2 → C4H2 + H; Anicich 1993; Chastaing et al. 1998), chemical reactions involving ions may also play a role in the synthesis of polyacetylenic chains. The polymerization of C2H2 in the external layers is dominated by neutral-neutral reactions involving C2H, rather than by ion-molecule reactions involving C2H+ 2, because photodissociation of C2H2 by the interstellar UV field is 5-10 times faster than photoionization (Heays et al. 2017; Agúndez et al. 2018). However, in the inner clumps of CSEs, where dust acts as an efficient shielding against UV photons but cosmic rays can penetrate, some C2H2 may be chemically processed due to cosmic-ray induced ionization and further ion-molecule reactions. The C-star envelope IRC +10216 is known to present a clumpy structure (Cernicharo et al. 2015) and, in fact, cation-neutral reactions have been suggested to play a role for the formation of, e.g., CH3CN, SiH3CN and CH3SiH3 (Agúndez et al. 2008; Cernicharo et al. 2017). However, the measured abundances of ions (cations and anions) is very low (X≤10−10), precluding an important role in the chemistry of the most abundant carbon-bearing species (note that the anions of all CnH radicals have been detected in the external and cold layers of the envelope but not in the inner warm regions).
In our experiments, as mentioned in the previous section, we estimate that around 2% of the injected acetylene reaches the magnetron and can therefore be dissociated into C2H by electron impact (see Fig. 9 for a scheme on the formation mechanism of radicals from atomic carbon and acetylene in SGAS). The interaction of C2 with H2 (either residual in the chamber as well as produced by recombination of the atomic hydrogen in excess) contributes as well to the formation of the C2H radical via the bimolecular reaction C2 + H2 → C2H + H (Cernicharo 2004; Martínez et al. 2020). In addition, and due to the higher cross section for electron impact ionization over electron impact dissociation (Mao et al. 2008), chemical reactions involving cations such as C2H+ 2 and C2H+ might take place. However, the electron temperature of the plasma in magnetron sputtering discharges and in SGAS sources is lower than 10 eV (Ivanov et al. 1992; Kousal et al. 2017), which favours electron impact dissociation over direct ionization or dissociative ionization events. This is different to the case of dusty plasmas in which apart from the neutral dissociative production of C2H, there is a higher probability for the formation of C2H+ 2 (from C2H2) and C2H+ (from C2H) by electron-knocking off and dissociative ionization processes, respectively. Thus, the chemistry of the formation of nanoparticles in C2H2 dusty plasmas presents a non-negligible ion-neutral contribution (Jimnez-Redondo et al. 2019). In addition, anionic polymeryzation routes can also be relevant in acetylene plasmas (Deschenaux et al. 1999; De Bleecker et al. 2006b; Jimnez-Redondo et al. 2019) due to the trapping of negative ions in the plasma potential, despite the electron attachment probability being several orders of magnitude lower than those for the electron impact dissociation/ionization. However, the chemistry involving anions is very unlikely in SGAS, in which it has been shown that the chemistry proceeds predominantly by neutral-neutral interactions (Haberland et al. 1991; Martínez et al. 2020).
Figure 9.
Formation mechanism of radicals from atomic carbon and acetylene in SGAS. Molecular hydrogen is both residual in the UHV system and formed by recombination of the released atomic hydrogen.
On the other hand, the results from OES suggest that the excited C2 is consumed to some extent in the reaction (R3) to produce the C4H radical. Therefore, during the production of the dust analogues the growth of polyacetylenic chains involves mainly the C2H and C4H radicals (Fig. 8). Moreover, the incorporation of conjugated polyalkynes to the dust analogues in higher amounts than those observed in acetylene discharges, as probed by IR spectroscopy, supports a significant contribution of the C4H chemical route, which is initiated by the addition of atomic carbon and subsequent formation of C2 in substantial amounts.
All the above mentioned reactions leading to the growth of polyacetylenic chains release either atomic or molecular hydrogen, which is consistent with the observed increase in the peak at m/z = 2 (Fig. 3c) and with the increase of the Hα line in the optical emission spectra (Fig. 2a), being therefore available in high amounts to participating in further chemical reactions. We assume that the atomic hydrogen that is not consumed in chemical reactions is recombined into H2 by three body reactions involving both Ar and the solid dust analogues.
4.2. Formation of PAHs
Benzene formation is considered as the bottleneck for the growth of PAHs, which have been proposed as the carriers of the AIBs and the seeds of carbonaceous cosmic dust. Benzene has been detected in protoplanetary nebulae (Cernicharo et al. 2001b; Malek et al. 2011) but not yet in the CSE of C-rich AGB stars, which constitute the main factories of cosmic dust. In addition, no specific PAH structure has been identified from observations. In particular, the apolar (or weakly polar) character of these molecules along with large rotational partition functions, hinder its detection by rotational emission spectroscopy (e.g. Joblin & Mulas 2009). Recently, benzonitrile has been detected in the ISM (McGuire et al. 2018), whose formation might be linked to cyanopolyynes in the same manner as benzene is believed to be related to polyynes.
Despite the lack of successful detection of benzene or PAHs in CSEs around C-rich AGB stars, a bottom-up chemical pathway, derived from combustion experiments, has been proposed for the formation of benzene and PAHs in the warm inner regions of C-rich CSEs (Cherchneff et al. 1992; Cherchneff 2012). In this scheme, the key reaction is the direct recombination of two propargyl radicals to form both cyclic and linear C6H6 as well as the phenyl radical (C6H5)
(R4a) |
(R4b) |
being reaction (R4a) more efficient than (R4b). A different chemical scheme involving hydrocarbon ions has been proposed to explain the formation of benzene in the protoplanetary nebula CRL 618 (Woods et al. 2002), where C6H6 has been detected. In this scheme, the synthesis is initiated with the proton transfer to C2H2 to form followed by successive reactions with C2H2 to form cyclic and ended with the reaction of with H2 to form which yield benzene upon dissociative recombination with electrons.
Apart from a top-down etching process (Merino et al. 2014) not considered here, another possible bottom-up mechanism for the formation of benzene involving neutral-neutral reactions has been derived from plasma discharges (De Bleecker et al. 2006a). In this case, C2H, which is also crucial to the formation of polyacetylenic chains, initiates the chemistry mainly by the termolecular association reaction
(R5) |
where M stands for a third-body.
In our case, due to the temperatures involved in the sputtering process in SGAS (in the order of 500 K) we rule out the formation of benzene via propargyl radicals (note that the observed by LDI-MS is formed during the laser desorption step by protonation of C3H2). In fact, the concurrent detection of C6H4 and C6H6 by in-situ mass spectrometry points towards a similar neutral-neutral route as that proposed for acetylene discharges, involving C2H and the formation of the butadienyl radical (C4H3). Moreover, the formation of C4H3 is less efficient than the formation of C4H2, which explains the observation of C6H6 only at the higher C2H2 flow rates employed in our experiments. Once C4H3 is formed, the main reactions with C2H2 produce C6H5 and C6H4 (Fig. 10), which account for about 75 % and 25% of the reaction mechanism towards C6H6, respectively (De Bleecker et al. 2006a). In our case, the detection of C6H5 is hindered due to the location of the mass spectrometers, which only allows stable species to be detected.
Figure 10.
Reaction pathway for the formation of PAHs.
Once C6H6 is formed, the growth towards PAHs has been considered in astrophysical models to proceed by the so-called HACA mechanism in which acetylene is the main species propagating the growth of aromatic rings (Fig. 10). In addition, the HAVA mechanism (Zhao et al. 2018) as well as fusion of PAHs (Shukla & Koshi 2010) have been proposed for the growth of large benzoid PAHs. However, none of them explains the formation of aromatics with aliphatic substituents (except those of acetylenic nature), such as those observed in our experiments, both in the gas-phase (by in-situ mass spectrometry) and in the solid dust analogues (by in-situ IR spectroscopy).
4.3. Formation of alkyl-substituted aromatics
Alkyl substituted aromatics have been proposed to be present in space based on the analysis of the 3.3/3.4 µm band intensity ratio (Joblin et al. 1996). Li & Draine (2012) estimated an upper limit of around 15 % for the aliphatic fraction in PAHs derived from the intensities of the 3.4 µm and 6.85 µm emission features. The formation of alkyl substituted aromatics is expected to involve the reactivity of the methyl radical (CH3) with aromatic units and/or aromatic radicals (Shukla et al. 2010).
In CSE around C-rich AGB stars, CH4 has been detected (Keady & Ridgway 1993) and it is likely that methyl radicals are present, although they have not been detected and their abundance is unknown. Chemical equilibrium predicts a relatively low abundance of 10−9 relative to H2 in the stellar atmosphere (Agúndez et al. 2020), and unfortunately chemical kinetics models of the inner wind (e.g., Cherchneff 2012) have not provided abundance estimates for CH3. A bottom-up synthesis of CH3 must involve the methylidyne radical (CH), which might arise from the interaction of atomic carbon with molecular hydrogen via C + H2 → CH + H. However, this reaction is endothermic by about 100 kJ/mol and necessitates temperatures in the range of several thousand Kelvin to be efficient. Thus, shock-wave induced chemistry would be needed to efficiently form the methylidyne radical from a bottom-up approach. Once CH radicals are formed, the interaction with H2 through the following reaction
(R6) |
where M stands for a third-body, can lead to CH3. If this is the case, cosmic dust might be needed as third body to efficiently produce CH3. On the other hand, CH3 radicals can be formed in the outer layers of the CSE by photodissociation of CH4 in the same way as C2H radicals are formed from C2H2.
Methylated species have been detected in the C-star AGB IRC+10216 (Cernicharo et al. 2000; Agúndez et al. 2015; Cernicharo et al. 2017). However, their low abundances suggest that they play a minor role in the chemistry of the envelope. A different situation has been found in the CRL618 PPN, where methylpolyynes (CH3C2H and CH3C4H) have been detected with abundances much larger than those observed in IRC+10216 (Cernicharo et al. 2001a)
Aromatic compounds with aliphatic moieties are neither produced in acetylene pyrolysis (Shukla & Koshi 2012) nor detected (or only very marginally) as neutral species in the gas phase of acetylene discharges (Deschenaux et al. 1999; Consoli et al. 2008). However, this is drastically different when other hydrocarbons are used, particularly in ethylene (C2H4) pyrolysis and ethylene plasmas (Jäger et al. 2006; Gillon & Houssiau 2014). This is related to the formation of alkyl radicals which enter into the chemistry, thus promoting the formation of alkyl moieties. Shukla et al. (2010) demonstrated that pyrolysis of aromatics in the presence of CH3 radicals can lead to aromatic growth through a Methyl-Addition Cyclization process and Gavilan et al. (2020) have recently proposed a route for PAH growth at low temperatures (150-200 K) by the addition of alkyl radicals.
In our case, the CH radical, which we observe by OES, is formed by the reaction
(R7) |
involving Ar and the solid dust analogues as third-body.
Once the CH radical is formed, subsequent three body associations with atomic H would lead to CH3. This chemical route continues to the formation of CH4, but the acetone impurity in the C2H2 bottle prevents its detection by in-situ mass spectrometry. Nevertheless, we have recently demonstrated the formation of CH4 and C2H4 by the interaction of atomic C and H2 even at very low H2 concentrations (Martínez et al. 2020).
The formation of toluene (C7H8) proceeds then by the reaction of phenyl (C6H5) and methyl (CH3) radicals through
(R8) |
being the phenyl radical formed as shown in Fig. 10.
The growth towards longer alkyl-chain substitutions to form e.g. ethylbenzene (C8H10) proceeds through hydrogen abstraction and methyl addition. This process is not limited to the phenyl radical but applies to any other aromatic radical formed during the growth of PAHs through the HACA mechanism (e.g., naphtyl: C10H7, acenaphtyl: C12H7,) and provides a route for the growth of alkyl substituted PAHs (Fig. 11), closely related to the Methyl-Addition Cyclization mechanism (Shukla et al. 2010).
Figure 11.
Reaction pathway for the formation of alkyl substituted aromatics through hydrogen abstraction and subsequent methyl addition.
On the other hand, the likely detection of styrene (C8H8) (maybe vinylnaphthalene (C12H10) as well) by in-situ mass spectrometry along with the identification of olefins by IR spectroscopy (including a band likely related to vinyl moieties) points towards the production of the vinyl radical (C2H3). Bimolecular reactions involving C, C2H2 and H2 to form C2H3 are highly endothermic for all the possible chemical routes. The same holds for the addition of C2H3 to PAHs and aromatic radicals. Therefore, we assume that the formation of aromatics with vinyl substitutions proceeds by three body reactions involving both Ar and the solid dust analogues.
4.4. Formation of C-clusters with odd C atoms
Molecules and carbon clusters with odd number of carbon atoms have been detected in the circumstellar environments of C-rich stars (Hinkle et al. 1988; Bernath et al. 1989) as well as in interstellar clouds (Maier et al. 2001). However, the growth of carbon clusters from C and C2 at the temperatures found in the CSE is still not well characterized since most chemical reactions involving small carbon clusters are still unknown. Up to date only the C2+C2 reaction has been measured at high temperature (Kruse & Roth 1997), which has been shown to present a high reaction rate. Therefore, although it potentially contributes to the chemistry, much is yet to be understood on the role of the Cn+Cm reactions in the formation of large carbon clusters. An alternative and efficient chemical route is provided by the interaction of atomic carbon with C2H2 through the reactions (Cernicharo 2004)
(R9a) |
(R9b) |
Additionally, C2H plays again an important role, as in the formation of polyacetylenic chains and benzene, as well as C4H by the interaction with atomic carbon via
(R10a) |
(R10b) |
Once C3 and C5 are formed by (R9) and (R10), the growth towards larger molecules with odd number of carbon atoms proceeds through the following reactions with acetylene
(R11a) |
(R11b) |
as well as by the following interactions with C2H and C4H
(R12a) |
(R12b) |
Therefore, the growth of C-clusters with an odd number of carbon atoms proceeds through two different chemical routes: an acetylenic route (R11) and a radical route (R12). In fact, these two chemical pathways do not apply only to C2n+1-clusters but also to C2n-clusters, providing a chemical way to the formation of hydrogenated C-clusters.
The above-mentioned mechanisms necessitate atomic carbon to initiate the chemistry, which is not present in acetylene combustion experiments or in acetylene discharges. In fact, in particle-forming acetylene discharges the dominant species are by far hydrocarbon molecules with even number of carbon atoms (Deschenaux et al. 1999; Consoli et al. 2008; Kovaevi et al. 2003; Benedikt 2010). On the contrary, the supply of atomic carbon in our case opens up both the acetylenic and the C2H/C4H radical routes described, resembling more closely the mechanism operating in the circumstellar environments of C-rich stars. Figure 12 summarizes the chemical network for the growth of C-clusters. Three body reactions involving Ar, which cannot be excluded in our experiments, are also shown.
Figure 12.
Reaction pathway for the formation of C2n+1Hm clusters.
5. Conclusions
In this article we present a thorough study of the gas-phase chemistry of acetylene in the presence of C and C2 which can pertain to the outer layers of C-rich AGB stars and protpplanetary nebulae. We have formed and studied in-situ cosmic dust analogues employing atomic carbon and acetylene as precursors, using a a well-controlled ultra-clean experimental set-up. Apart from the formation of linear polyacetylenic chains, we have observed the formation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). More importantly, aromatics with aliphatic substitutions as well as pure and hydrogenated carbon clusters were produced as a direct consequence of the addition of atomic carbon. The growth of carbon clusters proceeds from the interaction of atomic carbon with acetylene whereas the formation of alkyl-substituted aromatics is rationalized by the formation of methyl radicals and subsequent incorporation into aromatics by a hydrogen abstraction-methyl addition mechanism. In addition, the observed gas-phase species incorporate into the dust analogues, which consist in a complex mixture of sp, sp2 and sp3 hydrocarbons with an amorphous morphology. Our results are of particular interest for unveiling chemical routes leading to formation of acetylene-based molecular species in the external layers of AGB stars and in protoplanetary nebulae and foster the search for alkyl-substituted aromatics in these environments.
Acknowledgments
We thank the European Research Council for funding support under Synergy Grant ERC-2013-SyG, G.A. 610256 (NANOCOSMOS). Also, partial support from the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) through grants MAT2017-85089-c2-1R, FIS2016-77578-R, FIS2016-77726-C3-1-P, AYA2016-75066-C2-1-P, and RyC-2014-16277 is acknowledged. Support from the FotoArt-CM Project (P2018/NMT 4367) through the Program of R&D activities between research groups in Technologies 2013, co-financed by European Structural Funds, is also acknowledged. G.T-C. acknowledges funding from the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (PEJD-2018-PRE/IND-9029).
References
- Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, Quintana-Lacaci G, et al. The Astrophysical Journal. 2015;814:143. doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/814/2/143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agundez M, Fonfría JP, Cernicharo J, Pardo JR, Gúelin M. A&A. 2008;479:493. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Agúndez M, Martnéz JI, de Andrés PL, Cernicharo J, Martín-Gago JA. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & astrophysics. 2020 arXiv:2004.00519. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agúndez M, Roueff E, Le Petit F, Le Bourlot J. A&A. 2018;616:A19. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, Quintana-Lacaci G, et al. A&A. 2017;601:A4. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allamandola L, Tielens A, Barker J. The Astrophysical Journal. 1985;290:L25. doi: 10.1086/184435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Allamandola L, Tielens A, Barker J. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement series. 1989;71:733. doi: 10.1086/191396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anicich VG. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 1993;22:1469. doi: 10.1063/1.555940. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Benedikt J. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43:043001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/4/043001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bernath P, Hinkle K, Keady J. Science. 1989;244:562. doi: 10.1126/science.244.4904.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berteloite C, Le Picard SD, Balucani N, Canosa A, Sims IR. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:3677. doi: 10.1039/B923867K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biennier L, Georges R, Chandrasekaran V, et al. Carbon. 2009;47:3295. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Canosa A, Pramo A, Picard SDL, Sims IR. Icarus. 2007;187:558. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.10.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Carpentier Y, Féraud G, Dartois E, et al. A&A. 2012;548:A40. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J. The Astrophysical Journal. 2004;608:L41. doi: 10.1086/422170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J, Gúelin M, Kahane C. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser. 2000;142:181. doi: 10.1051/aas:2000147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J, Heras AM, Pardo JR, et al. The Astrophysical Journal. 2001a;546:L127. doi: 10.1086/318872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J, Heras AM, Tielens AGGM, et al. The Astrophysical Journal. 2001b;546:L123. doi: 10.1086/318871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Agúndez M, Gúelin M. A&A. 2015;575:A91. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cernicharo J, Agúndez M, Velilla Prieto L, et al. A&A. 2017;606:L5. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chastaing D, James PL, Sims IR, Smith IWM. Faraday Discuss. 1998;109:165. doi: 10.1039/A800495A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cherchneff I. Joblin C, Tielens AGGM, editors. EAS Publications Series. 2011;46:177–189. doi: 10.1051/eas/1146019. EAS Publications Series. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cherchneff I. A&A. 2012;545:A12. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cherchneff I, Barker JR, Tielens AGGM. ApJ. 1992;401:269. doi: 10.1086/172059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chiar JE, Tielens AGGM, Adamson AJ, Ricca A. The Astrophysical Journal. 2013;770:78. doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/78. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clary DC, Buonomo E, Sims IR, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2002;106:5541. doi: 10.1021/jp020310z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Consoli A, Benedikt J, von Keudell A. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2008;112:11319. doi: 10.1021/jp8042413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Contreras CS, Salama F. ApJS. 2013;208:6. doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dartois E, Muñoz Caro GM, Deboffle D, d’Hendecourt L. A&A. 2004;423:L33. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200400032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Daugey N, Caubet P, Bergeat A, Costes M, Hickson KM. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008;10:729. doi: 10.1039/B710796J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Bleecker K, Bogaerts A, Goedheer W. Applied Physics Letters. 2006a;88:151501. doi: 10.1063/1.2193796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- De Bleecker K, Bogaerts A, Goedheer W. Phys Rev E. 2006b;73:026405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deschenaux C, Affolter A, Magni D, Hollenstein C, Fayet P. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 1999;32:1876. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/32/15/316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrari AC, Rodil SE, Robertson J. Phys Rev B. 2003;67:155306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.155306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fonfría JP, Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, Richter MJ, Lacy JH. The Astrophysical Journal. 2018;852:80. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9ee0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonfría JP, Cernicharo J, Richter MJ, Lacy JH. The Astrophysical Journal. 2008;673:445. doi: 10.1086/523882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frenklach M, Feigelson E. The Astrophysical Journal. 1989;341:372. doi: 10.1086/167501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Frenklach M, Warnatz J. Combustion Science and Technology. 1987;51:265. doi: 10.1080/00102208708960325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gadallah KAK, Mutschke H, Jäger C. A&A. 2012;544:A107. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gavilan L, Bejaoui S, Haggmark M, et al. The Astrophysical Journal. 2020;889:101. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab62b7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gavilan L, Le KC, Pino T, et al. A&A. 2017;607:A73. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gehrz R. In: Allamandola LJ, Tielens AGGM, editors. Interstellar Dust; IAU Symposium; 1989. p. 445. [Google Scholar]
- Gillon X, Houssiau L. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2014;23 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/4/045010. 045010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Goto M, Gaessler W, Hayano Y, et al. ApJ. 2003;589:419. doi: 10.1086/368018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haberland H, Karrais M, Mall M. Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters. 1991;20:413. doi: 10.1007/BF01544025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haider N, Husain D. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIKALISCHE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL PHYSICS. 1992;176:133. [Google Scholar]
- Heays AN, Bosman AD, van Dishoeck EF. A&A. 2017;602:A105. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hinkle K, Keady J, Bernath P. Science. 1988;241:1319. doi: 10.1126/science.241.4871.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hony S, Van Kerckhoven C, Peeters E, et al. A&A. 2001;370:1030. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horcas I, Fernandez R, Gomez-Rodriguez JM, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2007;78 doi: 10.1063/1.2432410. 013705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husain D, Ioannou AX. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans. 1997;93:3625. doi: 10.1039/A704816E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Husain D, Young AN. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 2. 1975;71:525. doi: 10.1039/F29757100525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov I, Statev S, Orlinov V, Shkevov R. Vacuum. 1992;43:837. doi: 10.1016/0042-207X(92)90148-P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jäger C, Huisken F, Mutschke H, Jansa IL, Henning T. The Astrophysical Journal. 2009;696:706. doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/706. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jäger C, Krasnokutski S, Staicu A, et al. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2006;166:557. doi: 10.1086/507272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jimnez-Redondo M, Tanarro I, Pelez RJ, Daz-Prez L, Herrero VJ. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2019;123:8135. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b06399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joblin C, Mulas G. Boulanger F, Joblin C, Jones A, Madden S, editors. EAS Publications Series. 2009;35:133–152. doi: 10.1051/eas/0935008. EAS Publications Series. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Joblin C, Tielens AGGM, Allamandola LJ, Geballe TR. ApJ. 1996;458:610. doi: 10.1086/176843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keady JJ, Ridgway ST. ApJ. 1993;406:199. doi: 10.1086/172431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kousal J, Kolpaková A, Shelemin A, et al. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2017;26 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aa88e8. 105003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kovačević E, Stefanović I, Berndt J, Pendleton YJ, Winter J. The Astrophysical Journal. 2005;623:242. doi: 10.1086/428392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kovaevi E, Stefanovi I, Berndt J, Winter J. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;93:2924. doi: 10.1063/1.1541118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kruse T, Roth P. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 1997;101:2138. doi: 10.1021/jp963373o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kwok S, Zhang Y. Nature. 2011;479:80. doi: 10.1038/nature10542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leger A, Puget J. A&A. 1984;137:L5. [Google Scholar]
- Li A, Draine BT. ApJL. 2012;760:L35. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/760/2/L35. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liao Q, Herbst E. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL. 1995;444:694. [Google Scholar]
- Maier JP, Lakin NM, Walker GAH, Bohlender DA. The Astrophysical Journal. 2001;553:267. doi: 10.1086/320668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Malek SE, Cami J, Bernard-Salas J. The Astrophysical Journal. 2011;744:16. doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mao M, Benedikt J, Consoli A, Bogaerts A. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2008;41 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/22/225201. 225201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez L, Díaz M, Román E, et al. Langmuir. 2012;28:11241. doi: 10.1021/la3022134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez L, Lauwaet K, Santoro G, et al. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:7250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25472-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez L, Santoro G, Merino P, et al. Nature Astronomy. 2020;4:97. doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0899-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer S, Schieler L, Johnston H. Symposium (International) on Combustion; 1967. p. 837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McGuire BA, Burkhardt AM, Kalenskii S, et al. Science. 2018;359:202. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merino P, vec M, Martinez JI, et al. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3054. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller J, Melius C. Combustion and Flame. 1992;91:21. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(92)90124-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- NIST Mass Spectrometry Data Center. William E, Wallace d. In: NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Linstrom P, Mallard W, editors. National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pascoli G, Polleux A. A&A. 2000;359:799. [Google Scholar]
- Peeters E, Hony S, Van Kerckhoven C, et al. A&A. 2002;390:1089. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peeters E, Spoon HWW, Tielens AGGM. ApJ. 2004;613:986. doi: 10.1086/423237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pendleton YJ, Allamandola LJ. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2002;138:75. doi: 10.1086/322999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pilleri P, Joblin C, Boulanger F, Onaka T. A&A. 2015;577:A16. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puget J, Leger A. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1989;27:161. [Google Scholar]
- Rodil S. Diamond and Related Materials. 2005;14:1262. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2005.01.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sabbah H, Bonnamy A, Papanastasiou D, et al. The Astrophysical Journal. 2017;843:34. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa73dd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato K, Ishida N, Kurakata T, Iwasaki A, Tsunashima S. Chemical Physics. 1998;237:195. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0104(98)00183-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shukla B, Koshi M. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:2427. doi: 10.1039/B919644G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shukla B, Koshi M. Combustion and Flame. 2012;159:3589. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shukla B, Miyoshi A, Koshi M. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2010;21:534. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socrates G. Infrared characteristic group frequencies. John Wiley & Sons; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Stefanović I, Kovačević E, Berndt J, Pendleton Y, Winter J. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 2005;47:A179. doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5a/013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stoykov S, Eggs C, Kortshagen U. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2001;34:2160. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/34/14/312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Woods PM, Millar TJ, Zijlstra AA, Herbst E. ApJL. 2002;574:L167. doi: 10.1086/342503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang T, Troy TP, Xu B, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2016;55 doi: 10.1002/anie.201607509. 14983. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao L, Kaiser RI, Xu B, et al. Nature Astronomy. 2018;2:413. doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0399-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]