Abstract
We report an enzymatic route for the formal regio- and stereoselective aminohydroxylation of β-methylstyrene that consumes only dioxygen, ammonia and formate; carbonate is the by-product. The biocascade entails highly selective epoxidation, hydrolysis and hydrogen-borrowing alcohol amination. Thus, β-methylstyrene was converted into 1R,2R and 1S,2R-phenylpropanolamine in 59–63% isolated yields, and up to >99.5: <0.5 dr and er.
Chiral 1,2-amino alcohol moieties are found in a plethora of natural products and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), including antibiotics, anti-asthma drugs, hormones, alkaloids, enzyme inhibitors, and β-adrenergic blockers.1–4 They also find application as ligands or auxiliaries in asymmetric organic synthesis.5–7 In this context, phenylpropanolamines (PPAs, 5) are particularly interesting as intermediates or final products due to their pharmaceutical properties. PPAs can be isolated as a mixture of diastereomers (1S,2S-5 and 1R,2S-5) from the leaves of Celastraceae and Ephedraceae plant families.8,9 Chemical synthesis of PPAs commonly consumes various reagents in suprastoichiometric amounts and leads to high yields yet modest optical purities or vice versa.2,3,10–14 Moreover, most of these methods require several steps of isolation and purification of intermediates along the synthetic route, thus increasing significantly E-factors, solvent demands, and energy consumption (e.g., for evaporation).15,16 In some cases, catalytic steps involving the use of toxic transition metals are needed, thereby contributing to an unfavorable environmental footprint of the process. For instance, trans-β-methylstyrene (trans-1) was converted into 1R,2R-5 through oxazoline intermediate in 75% overall yield, 99% de, but 86% ee.17 The synthesis of the four PPA isomers 5 was accomplished via a multi-step route, which comprised an asymmetric reduction of α-functionalized ketones using chiral reducing agents. Although yields ranged from 40% to 98%, a mixture of stereoisomers was always isolated.18 The PPA isomers 5 were also obtained in six steps in ca. 40% yield, 96% ee and dr starting from rac-2-phenyl-2-trimethylsilyloxyacetonitrile.10 In a recent study, the direct 1,2-aminohydroxylation of cis- and trans-1 using PivONH3OTf as aminating reagent was catalyzed by Fe(II)-phthalocyanine. Although the reaction proceeded with perfect regioselectivity, only moderate yields (up to 26%) of a mixture of diastereomers were obtained.19 With the aim of finding viable alternatives to the use of toxic reagents and reducing the processes’ generated waste to fulfill the criteria of green chemistry,15,16,20 a number of biocatalytic routes towards PPAs synthesis have been reported. For instance, chemo-enzymatic approaches for the preparation of PPAs have combined either hydroxynitrile lyases (HNL) or Baker’s yeasts with a chemical reduction step.3 In the former case, 1S,2R-5 and 1R, 2S-5 (35–47% yield) were obtained in high optical purities (99% ee, 90–92% de) through a five-step route.21,22 In the latter case, 1R,2R-5 and 1R,2S-5 were obtained as a mixture of diastereomers in moderate yields.23,24 Although fully enzymatic methods for the synthesis of 1,2-amino alcohols possessing one stereogenic center were recently developed,25–27 only three routes are currently available for the stereoselective preparation of PPAs to thereby create two stereogenic centers.3,4 The first route converts 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione into 1R,2S-5 or 1S, 2S-5 through a one-pot and sequential combination of an ω-transaminase (ωTA) with an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH).28 The second route comprises an enzymatic carboligation between benzaldehyde and pyruvate followed by a stereoselective transamination to yield 1R,2S-5 and 1R,2R-5 (up to >95% conversion; 98% de and >99% ee).11 A similar route was lately reported for the enzymatic synthesis of 1R,2S-5 (60% yield; ee and de >99.5%).29 Conversely, the synthesis of 1S,2R-5 using the two above-mentioned enzymatic approaches was reported with ca. 20% conversion and moderate levels of diastereomeric purities (60–80% de).28 The third enzymatic method entails the enantio-selective aminohydroxylation of styrene derivatives catalyzed by an engineered hemoprotein. Starting from trans-anethole, the 1,2-amino alcohol product was obtained with 95% ee and 87 : 13 dr.30
In this work, we report a strategy for the synthesis of 1S,2R-5 and 1R,2R-5 in elevated optical purity by implementing a biocatalytic dual-enzyme hydrogen-borrowing (HB) amination.31 Notably, HB-amination by pairing an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) with either an amine dehydrogenase (AmDH) or a reductive aminase (RedAm) was previously applied for the amination of molecules possessing only one hydroxyl moiety.31–35 Herein, we investigated the potential of the biocatalytic HB-amination for a concomitant regio- and stereoselective amination of the synthetically relevant 1-phenylpropane-1,2-diol (3). Furthermore, the selective bioamination was integrated in a multi-enzymatic route that starts from the inexpensive and easily available substrate 1.
All of the four diol isomers (3) were enzymatically synthesized from cis- or trans-1 through a one-pot cascade that combined our fused styrene monooxygenase (Fus-SMO)36 with either Sp(S)-EH or St(R)-EH as stereocomplementary epoxide hydrolases (Fig. 1A).37 The enzymes were expressed and used as E. coli lyophilized cells. The stereoselectivity of combined epoxidation and hydrolysis was initially studied in a one-pot concurrent cascade on analytical scale (ESI section 4.1†), in which trans-1 or cis-1 (20 mM) were incubated in a biphasic mixture of KPi buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0, 0.5 mL) and heptane (0.5 mL), containing E. coli/Fus-SMO (10 mg), either E. coli/Sp (S)-EH or E. coli/St(R)-EH (10 mg), FAD (50 μM), NAD+ (1 mM), and Cb-FDH (10 μM)/HCOONa (100 mM) for NADH recycling. The use of an aqueous/organic biphasic system limited the molecular toxicity of the epoxide intermediates to the enzymes, reduced the loss of volatile 1, and enabled a practical isolation of the final diol products by simple phase separation. The four stereoisomers of diol 3 were obtained with elevated diastereomeric ratios (ESI, Table S2†). Thus, we performed the one-pot cascade slightly above three hundreds milligrams scale, which yielded diols 3 in quantitative conversion, high isolated yields (78–85%), and high optical purity (Table 1). Fus-SMO and Cb-FDH were co-expressed in the same host (ESI section 4.2†) in this latter set of experiments.36
Fig. 1.
(A) One-pot cascade for the stereoselective dihydroxylation of 1 (20–50 mM) in KPi buffer (pH 8.0, 50 mM)/heptane (1 : 1 v/v) using E. coli/ Fus-SMO/FDH (5 mg mL−1), E. coli/Sp(S)-EH or St(R)-EH (20 mg mL−1), HCOONa (5 eq.), NAD+ (1 mM), FAD (50 μM). (B) One-pot regio- and stereospecific HB-amination (ADH/AmDH) of 3 (5–20 mM) in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M), NAD+ (1 mM). Note: The names of all wild-type strains from which the enzymes used in this study were recombinantly expressed (and, in case, engineered) are reported in ESI, Table S1.†
Table 1.
Conversion [%] of 1 (trans or cis) to chiral 3 through a biocatalytic cascade combining E. coli/Fus-SMO/Cb-FDH and E. coli/EHs
| Sub. | EH | Conv.a [%] | Isolated yield [%] | erb [%] | drb [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trans-1 | Sp(S) | >99 | 85 | 99 (1S,2R-3) | >99.5 : <0.5 |
| trans-1 | St(R) | >99 | 78 | >99.5 (1R,2S-3) | >99.5 : <0.5 |
| cis-1 | Sp(S) | >99 | 83 | 95.5 (1S,2S-3) | >99.5 : <0.5 |
| cis-1 | St(R) | >99 | 79 | >99.5 (1R,2R-3) | >99.5 : <0.5 |
GC-FID analysis.
Normal phase-HPLC (chiral column).
Next, we focused on the second part of the multi-enzymatic process, which is the conversion of a diol enantiomer 3 into optically active PPA (5, Fig. 1B). Initially, we investigated the single oxidation of diol 3 (as a mixture of the four stereoisomers) by screening a panel of eleven stereocomplementary ADHs (six NAD+ and five NADP+ dependent; ESI section 5†). The ADHs were tested either as purified enzymes (i.e., 50 μM Aa-ADH,38 Lbv-ADH,39 or Lb-ADH40) or lyophilized whole cells (i.e., 20 mg mL-1 of E. coli cells expressing Sy-ADH,41 Pp-ADH,42 Bs-BDHA,43 Ls-ADH,44 Te-ADH variant 1, 2, or 3,45 or Rs-ADH;46 for details, see ESI, Tables S1 and S4†). The reactions were run for 24 h in Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5, 50 mM) at 30 °C, with the only exception being the oxidation catalyzed by Ls-ADH, which was conducted in KPi buffer (pH 6.5, 100 mM) at 40 °C. The reactions were supplemented with NAD+ or NADP+ (1 mM), which were recycled by a specific NAD(P)H oxidase—i.e., NOX47 0.5 μM for NADH or YcnD48 5 μM for NADPH.
Only three NAD+-dependent ADHs, namely Aa-ADH, Bs-BDHA, and Ls-ADH, proved to be sufficiently active towards diol 3 isomers. In these three cases, the desired 1-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-2-one (4) was obtained as the main product (31%, 36%, and 15% conversions, respectively); however, 2-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-1-one (6) (9–22%) and fully oxidized di-ketone product (7) (2-5%) were also detected (ESI section 5†). Notably, the three ADHs exhibited varying stereo-selectivity; whereas Bs-ADH oxidized 1S,2R-3 and 1R,2S-3, Ls-ADH oxidized 1S,2R-3 and 1R,2R-3 and Aa-ADH oxidized 1R,2R-3, 1S,2S-3 and 1R,2S-3. It is important to note that the composition of the reaction mixture might be partly determined by a possible spontaneous chemical isomerization between 4 and 6 (and their enantiomers) due to tautomeric equilibrium.
In the next step, we investigated the biocatalytic reductive amination of the hydroxy-ketone intermediate (rac-4, 20 mM) by screening three ‘R-selective’ amine dehydrogenases49–51 (Ch1-AmDH, Rs-PhAmDH and Bb-AmDH; 100 μM) in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M; 1 mL reaction volume) in the presence of NAD+ (1 mM) and Cb-FDH (14.1 μM) at 30 °C for 24 h. Ch1-AmDH and Rs-PhAmDH showed conversion to 5 (24% and 79%, respectively) as a mixture of diastereomers (1S,2R and 1R,2R), whereas Bb-AmDH was inactive towards rac-4 (data not shown). Therefore, we initially tested the HB-amination on analytical scale using 1S,2S-3 (5 mM) as a substrate and combining Aa-ADH and AmDH (Ch1-AmDH or Rs-PhAmDH) in a 50 : 50 ratio (μM) in one pot. The reactions were conducted in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M, 0.5 mL final volume) supplemented with NAD+ (1 mM). Ch1-AmDH generally was the best performing AmDH for the HB-amination of 1S,2S-3 in combination with Aa-ADH. Quantitative conversion and high product yield (89 ± 2%) were consistently obtained at 30 °C for 48 h (ESI, Table S5†); therefore, this temperature and reaction time were kept for further studies. Notably, the combination of ADH and AmDH in one pot prevented the formation of the byproducts 6 and 7, which were previously detected in the single ADH-catalyzed oxidation of 3. However, other by-products were observed in this non-optimized HB-amination, particularly 2-amino-1-phenylpropan-1-one (8, ca. 8%) (ESI, Table S5†).
Next, we proceeded with the optimization of the HB-amination of 1S,2S-3 (5 mM) using varied molar ratios of Aa-ADH and either Ch1-AmDH or Rs-PhAmDH (ESI, Table S6†). Under these conditions, Aa-ADH (20 μM) and Ch1-AmDH (50 μM) were the best combination in terms of analytical yield into 1S,2R-5 (87 ± 1%), chemoselectivity (ca. 2% of by-products), and optical purity (er >99.5: <0.5 and dr 95 : 5). Notably, the intrinsic stereoselectivity of the HB-amination was perfect, as the dr of 95 : 5 reflects the level of optical purity of 1S,2S-3 obtained in the previous cascade (Table 1). Interestingly, the application of a higher substrate concentration further improved the chemoselectivity of the HB-amination. For instance, at 10 mM concentration of 1S,2S-3 substrate, 1S,2R-5 was obtained in 69 ± 1% analytical yield with ≤1% of by-products, while er and dr remained unaltered (ESI, Table S7†). However, a further increase of substrate concentration while maintaining the same concentrations of Aa-ADH and Ch1-AmDH resulted in reduced yields. A fine tuning of the reaction conditions (ESI, Tables S8†) by varying the relative amount of dehydrogenases and substrate concentration led to optimal conditions—1S,2S-3 (20 mM), Aa-ADH (70 μM), Ch1-AmDH (35 μM), under which 1S,2R-5 was obtained in 98 ± 1% analytical yield and high optical purity (Table 2, entry 1). Finally, we monitored the progress of the HB-amination of 1S,2S-3 (20 mM) over time under the optimized conditions. As depicted in Fig. 2, 42 hours are required for the reaction to reach completion.
Table 2.
Regio- and stereospecific HB-amination of optically active 3 in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M, 0.5 mL) containing NAD+ (1 mM) at 30 °C and different enzyme concentrations (ADH/Ch1-AmDH) for 48 h
| Entry | Sub. | Con. [mM] | ADH | ADH : Ch1-AmDH [μM] | Conv.a [%] | Producta [%] | erb [%] | dr [SS: RR/RS: SR]b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1S,2S-3 | 20 | Aa-ADH | 70:35 | >99 | 98 ± 1 | >99.5 : <0.5 | 1:4/0: 95c |
| 2 | 1S,2R-3 | 15 | Bs-BDHA | 50 : 50 | >99 | 95 ± 1 | >99.5 : <0.5 | 0 : 2.4/0 : 97.6c |
| 3 | 1R,2R-3 | 20 | Ls-ADH | 24 : 60 | >99 | 98 ± 1 | >99.5 : <0.5 | n.d. : >99.5/n.d. : n.d. |
| 4 | 1R,2R-3 | 20 | Ls-ADH | 35 : 70 | >99 | 99 ± 1 | >99.5 : <0.5 | n.d. : >99.5/n.d. : n.d. |
| 5 | 1R,2S-3 | 5 | Aa-ADH | 50 : 50 | 80 ± 5 | 75 ± 5 | >99.5 : <0.5 | 0: >99.5/0:0 |
Measured by GC-FID; the error represents experimental deviation over two independent measurements and it does not directly refer to the intrinsic instrumental detection limit that is even more accurate.
Measured by RP-HPLC after derivatization with a chiral reagent.
dr due to initial optical purity of substrate.
Fig. 2.
Progress of the regio- and stereospecific HB-amination of 1S,2S-3 (20 mM) to yield 1S,2R-5 catalyzed by Aa-ADH (70 μM) and Ch1-AmDH (35 μM) in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M, 0.5 mL) containing NAD+ (1 mM).
Next, the biocatalytic HB-amination was investigated on the other three diol isomers (3). Bs-BDHA and Ls-ADH (50 μM each) operated almost equally well in combination with Ch1-AmDH for the amination of 1S,2R-3 (5 mM) to give 1S,2R-5 at 30 °C (ESI, Table S10†). Bs-BDHA was used for further studies, as it provided a slightly higher average yield (91 ± 3% vs. 89 ± 1%). Increasing the substrate concentration at constant enzyme concentrations afforded 95 ± 1%, 91 ± 1%, 87 ± 1%, and 80 ± 1% analytical yields at 15, 20, 25, and 30 mM concentrations of 1S,2R-3, respectively (ESI, Table S11†). Stereoselectivity was also high with >99.5 : <0.5 er and 98 : 2 dr (Table 2, entry 2). Also in this case, the dr reflects the enantio-purity of the diol substrate, whereas the HB-amination is stereospecific. Further tuning of the enzyme ratio did not provide any further improvement (ESI, Table S12†). Ls-ADH with Ch1-AmDH was found to be the best combination for the amination of 1R,2R-3 at 30 °C, although Rs-PhAmDH also performed efficiently (ESI, Table S13†), yielding 1R,2R-5 with perfect regio- and stereo-selectivity (er >99.5: <0.5, dr >99.5 : <0.5). The Ls-ADH/Ch1-AmDH combination also tolerated higher substrate concentrations (87 ± 1% yield at 30 mM of 1R,2R-3; ESI, Table S14†). Under the optimized conditions (Ls-ADH 35 μM, Ch1-AmDH 70 μM, 20 mM 1R,2R-3), 1R,2R-5 was obtained in 99 ± 1% analytical yield and perfect stereoselectivity (Table 2, entry 4; details of ESI, Table S15†). The last case was the amination of 1R,2S-3 to yield 1R,2R-5 (also obtained previously starting from 1R,2R-3). Aa-ADH was again the optimal ADH, whereas Ch1-AmDH performed slightly better than Rs-PhAmDH (ESI, Table S16† and Table 2, entry 5; 75 ± 5% vs. 63 ± 3% analytical yield, with 50 μM of each enzyme and at 5 mM of 1R,2S-3). Further optimization did not lead to any significant improvement, which is likely due to the insufficient activity of Aa-ADH on 1R,2S-3. In fact, the other case reported in Table 2 (entries 3 and 4) clearly demonstrated that the 1R-4 intermediate is efficiently aminated by Ch1-AmDH.
In order to evaluate its applicability, the regio- and stereo-selective dual enzyme HB-amination of 1,2-diols was performed slightly above one hundred milligrams scale for 1R,2R-3 (20 mM, 105 mg, 0.690 mmol) and 1S,2R-3 (15 mM, 102 mg, 0.670 mmol) to yield 1R,2R-5 and 1S,2R-5, respectively. The reactions were performed in HCOONH4 buffer (pH 8.5, 1 M) supplemented with NAD+ (1 mM) at 30 °C for 48 h. Both amino alcohol products were quantitatively converted with high chemoselectivity (<2% by-products) as well as regio- and stereoselectivity. Upon extraction with MTBE, 1R,2R-5 and 1S,2R-5 could be isolated in elevated yield (74%), er (>99.5 : <0.5) and dr (>99.5 : <0.5 or 98 : 2, respectively). Therefore, considering the asymmetric dihydroxylation step (Table 1) along with the hydrogen-borrowing amination step, the overall yield for the conversion of 1 into optically active 5 were 59% and 63%, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3. Overall yields for the multi-enzymatic conversion [%] of 1 (trans or cis) into 1R,2R-5 or 1S,2R-5 .
| Entry | Sub. | Step 1 Yield [%] |
Step 2 Yield [%] |
Combined Yield [%] |
er [%] | dr [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | trans-1 | 85 | 74 | 63 (1S,2R-5) | >99.5 : <0.5 | 98 : 2a |
| 2 | cis-1 | 79 | 74 | 59 (1R,2R-5) | >99.5 : <0.5 | >99.5 : <0.5 |
Dependent on stereoselectivity of Step 1.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we developed a sequential multi-enzymatic process for the conversion of β-methylstyrene into phenylpropanolamines with high chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity. The use of multiple enzymes in one pot has several economic and environmental advantages as this eliminates the need for intermediate isolation steps, which generally lead to time-, solvent- and energy-consuming workups.52–55 The present approach consists of four enzymatic reactions but required the sole and easy isolation of the diol intermediates 3. The enzymatic route consumes only dioxygen and one equivalent of ammonia and formate and produces only one equivalent of carbonate as by-product.
With the aim of critically evaluating the greenness of our methodology to obtain optically active PPAs, we have estimated and compared the simple E-factors (i.e., sEF, without solvents contribution) and the solvent demand for: (1) our process; (2) a representative multi-step chemical route involving metallorganic complexes;17 (3) a recently reported direct and catalytic 1,2-aminohydroxylation of cis- and trans-1;19 (4) and another highly atom-efficient one-pot two-step biocatalytic route starting from benzaldehyde (for details, see ESI section 10†).11 The representative multi-step chemical route by Minakata et al.17 results in a sEF above 110, mainly due to the intermediate purification step and the required excess of starting material. The direct and catalytic 1,2-aminohydroxylation by Legnani et al.19 results in a sEF between ca. 50 and 80, depending on the reaction conditions; the main reason for this sEF value is the moderate conversion and the suprastoichiometric amount of a complex aminating agent. Notably, in these two chemical methods, the sEF associated to the preparation of the catalysts was not included as these data could not be accessed in a reliable manner; therefore, the actual sEF must be higher than estimated herein. Furthermore, as the final products are never obtained in optically pure form, an additional recrystallization step to upgrade er and dr would further increase the sEF of the process. In comparison, the biocatalytic route by Sehl et al.11 results in the lowest sEF of ca. 4 due to the internal recycling of pyruvate between the two steps. However, the data used for the calculation of this sEF relate to a reaction on analytical scale, for which a conversion was measured but the product was not isolated. The new biocatalytic route described in this work results in a sEF of ca. 10. However, in our case, the reactions were conducted slightly above 300 mg (step 1) and 100 mg (step 2) scale, and the products were isolated. Moreover, comparing our methodology with the other biocatalytic route by Sehl et al., the starting material is different (β-methylstyrene vs. benzaldehyde) and different biocatalyst’s forms were used (e.g., lyophilized cells, lyophilized crude cell extract, purified enzyme). By considering these factors, we deem the actual sEF values of the two biocatalytic processes to be essentially equivalent. Additionally, the solvent demand of the two biocatalytic processes was also from two to six-fold lower compared with the values calculated for the chemical processes.
Finally, this work reports the first case in which the regioselectivity of the dual-enzyme HB-amination was investigated and exploited in preparative scale, thus further demonstrating the potential of this reaction in asymmetric synthesis. The currently attainable number and diversity of enantiomeric products are limited by the availability of complementary regio- and stereoselective ADHs and AmDHs. However, protein engineering and the discovery of novel AmDHs and ADHs are expected to enhance the applicability of this synthetic methodology towards the synthesis of a wide variety of enantiopure PPAs as well as other structurally diverse 1,2-amino alcohols.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was financed by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Grant ECHO Chemistry in Relation to Technology and Sustainability 2013 CW, project number 717.014.007. F. G. M. and T. K. received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant (H2020, grant agreement 638271, BioSusAmin).
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
- 1.Breuer M, Ditrich K, Habicher T, Hauer B, Kesseler M, Sturmer R, Zelinski T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:788–824. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bergmeier SC. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:2561–2576. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sehl T, Maugeri Z, Rother D. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2015;114:65–71. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gupta P, Mahajan N. New J Chem. 2018;42:12296–12327. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vicario J, Badia D, Carrillo L, Reyes E, Etxebarria J. Curr Org Chem. 2005;9:219–235. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Everaere K, Mortreux A, Carpentier J-F. Adv Synth Catal. 2003;345:67–77. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ager DJ, Prakash I, Schaad DR. Chem Rev. 1996;96:835–876. doi: 10.1021/cr9500038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Krizevski R, Dudai N, Bar E, Lewinsohn E. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;114:432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grue-Soerensen G, Spenser ID. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:6195–6200. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee HK, Kang S, Choi EB. J Org Chem. 2012;77:5454–5460. doi: 10.1021/jo300867y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sehl T, Hailes HC, Ward JM, Wardenga R, von Lieres E, Offermann H, Westphal R, Pohl M, Rother D. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:6772–6775. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Groeper JA, Hitchcock SR, Ferrence GM. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2006;17:2884–2889. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sello G, Orsini F, Bernasconi S, Gennaro PD. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2006;17:372–376. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schrittwieser JH, Coccia F, Kara S, Grischek B, Kroutil W, d’Alessandro N, Hollmann F. Green Chem. 2013;15:3318–3331. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sheldon RA. Green Chem. 2017;19:18–43. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sheldon RA. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2017;6:32–48. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Minakata S, Nishimura M, Takahashi T, Oderaotoshi Y, Komatsu M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:9019–9022. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim DJ, Cho BT. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2003;24:1641–1648. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Legnani L, Morandi B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:2248–2251. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Erythropel HC, Zimmerman JB, de Winter TM, Petitjean L, Melnikov F, Lam CH, Lounsbury AW, Mellor KE, Janković NZ, Tu Q, Pincus LN, et al. Green Chem. 2018;20:1929–1961. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Effenberger F, Hörsch B, Förster S, Ziegler T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:1249–1252. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Effenberger F, Gutterer B, Ziegler T. Liebigs Ann Chem. 1991:269–273. 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kreutz OC, Moran PJS, Rodrigues JAR. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1997;8:2649–2653. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moran PJS, Rodrigues JAR, Joekes I, Brenelli ECS, Leite RA. Biocatalysis. 2009;9:321–328. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu S, Zhou Y, Li Z. Chem Commun. 2019;55:883–896. doi: 10.1039/c8cc07828a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu S, Zhou Y, Wang T, Too HP, Wang DI, Li Z. Nat Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11917. 11917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun ZB, Zhang ZJ, Li FL, Nie Y, Yu HL, Xu JH. ChemCatChem. 2019;11:3802–3807. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sehl T, Hailes HC, Ward JM, Menyes U, Pohl M, Rother D. Green Chem. 2014;16:3341–3348. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu X, Fei M, Chen Y, Wang Z, Chen Y. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:7399–7408. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5797-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cho I, Prier CK, Jia ZJ, Zhang RK, Gorbe T, Arnold FH. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2019;58:3138–3142. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mutti FG, Knaus T, Scrutton NS, Breuer M, Turner NJ. Science. 2015;349:1525–1529. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen F-F, Liu Y-Y, Zheng G-W, Xu J-H. ChemCatChem. 2015;7:3838–3841. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Böhmer W, Knaus T, Mutti FG. ChemCatChem. 2018;10:731–735. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201701366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thompson MP, Turner NJ. ChemCatChem. 2017;9:3833–3836. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Montgomery SL, Mangas-Sanchez J, Thompson MP, Aleku GA, Dominguez B, Turner NJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2017;56:10491–10494. doi: 10.1002/anie.201705848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Corrado ML, Knaus T, Mutti FG. ChemBioChem. 2018;19:679–686. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu S, Chen Y, Xu Y, Li A, Xu Q, Glieder A, Li Z. ACS Catal. 2014;4:409–420. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoffken HW, Duong M, Friedrich T, Breuer M, Hauer B, Reinhardt R, Rabus R, Heider J. Biochemistry. 2006;45:82–93. doi: 10.1021/bi051596b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schlieben NH, Niefind K, Muller J, Riebel B, Hummel W, Schomburg D. J Mol Biol. 2005;349:801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Niefind K, Muller J, Riebel B, Hummel W, Schomburg D. J Mol Biol. 2003;327:317–328. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lavandera I, Kern A, Resch V, Ferreira-Silva B, Glieder A, Fabian WM, de Wildeman S, Kroutil W. Org Lett. 2008;10:2155–2158. doi: 10.1021/ol800549f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lavandera I, Kern A, Schaffenberger M, Gross J, Glieder A, de Wildeman S, Kroutil W. ChemSusChem. 2008;1:431–436. doi: 10.1002/cssc.200800032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang J, Xu T, Li Z. Adv Synth Catal. 2013;355:3147–3153. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Inoue K, Makino Y, Itoh N. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:3633–3641. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3633-3641.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Knaus T, Cariati L, Masman MF, Mutti FG. Org Biomol Chem. 2017;15:8313–8325. doi: 10.1039/c7ob01927k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lavandera I, Kern A, Ferreira-Silva B, Glieder A, de Wildeman S, Kroutil W. J Org Chem. 2008;73:6003–6005. doi: 10.1021/jo800849d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matsumoto J, Higuchi M, Shimada M, Yamamoto Y, Kamio Y. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996;60:39–43. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morokutti A, Lyskowski A, Sollner S, Pointner E, Fitzpatrick TB, Kratky C, Gruber K, Macheroux P. Biochemistry. 2005;44:13724–13733. doi: 10.1021/bi0510835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bommarius BR, Schurmann M, Bommarius AS. Chem Commun. 2014;50:14953–14955. doi: 10.1039/c4cc06527a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ye LJ, Toh HH, Yang Y, Adams JP, Snajdrova R, Li Z. ACS Catal. 2015;5:1119–1122. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abrahamson MJ, Wong JW, Bommarius AS. Adv Synth Catal. 2013;355:1780–1786. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schrittwieser JH, Velikogne S, Hall M, Kroutil W. Chem Rev. 2018;118:270–348. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sheldon RA, Woodley JM. Chem Rev. 2018;118:801–838. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sheldon RA, Brady D. ChemSusChem. 2019;12:2859–2881. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201900351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Knaus T, Mutti FG. Chim Oggi-Chem Today. 2017;35:34–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


