Skip to main content
Future Science OA logoLink to Future Science OA
. 2020 Jan 29;6(4):FSO456. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2019-0117

Differential gene expression profile of Shigella dysenteriae causing bacteremia in an immunocompromised individual

Dhiviya Prabaa Muthuirulandi Sethuvel 1, Naveen Kumar Devanga Ragupathi 1, Marilyn M Ninan 1, Joy Sarojini Michael 1, Shalini Anandan 1, Balaji Veeraraghavan 1,*
PMCID: PMC7117556  PMID: 32257369

Abstract

Aim:

Shigella species has varying levels of virulence gene expression with respect to different sites of infection. In this study, the differential gene expression of S. dysenteriae in response to its site of infection was analyzed by transcriptomics.

Methods:

This study includes four clinical Shigella isolates. Transcriptomics was done for the stool and blood samples of a single patient. Isolates were screened for the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes.

Results:

The majority of genes involved in invasion were highly expressed in the strain isolated from the primary site of infection. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance (dhfr1A, sulII, blaOXA. blaCTX-M-1 and qnrS) genes were identified.

Conclusion:

This study provides a concise view of the transcriptional expression of clinical strains and provides a basis for future functional studies on Shigella spp.

Keywords: : gene expression, IcsA, invasive, RNA-Seq analysis, Shigella

Lay abstract

Shigella infection is restricted to the gastrointestinal tract and rarely causes fatal extra-intestinal complications like bacteremia. There are limited studies available from India on molecular characterization of Shigella spp. In this study, we characterized four Shigella isolates obtained from bloodstream infections. Shigella spp. isolated from the stool and blood of one representative patient was further sequenced to study the differential gene expression profile. The differential protein expression by S. dysenteriae observed in this study demonstrates that it has a specific response to particular intracellular environments. Further, the in vivo mechanism of Shigellae invasion are difficult to fully study until the intracellular environment is mimicked in vitro. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Indian study that compared the gene expression profile of clinical Shigella strains.


Diarrheal disease is the second leading cause of mortality in children according to WHO [1]. Shigella spp. is one of the important causes of dysentery globally and causes severe and occasionally life-threatening diarrheal infection. In Asia, it is estimated that there are 125 million infections and 14,000 deaths due to shigellosis annually [2]. Clinically, the infection may lead to rare but potentially fatal extra-intestinal complications like bacteremia. Though, bacteremia due to Shigella spp. is rare, it is reported in 0.4–7% of the cases. Notably, young age, malnutrition and immunosuppression are known to be the risk factors for Shigella spp. bacteremia [3].

Bacteria have developed various mechanisms to adhere to the organ surfaces. Some bacteria can adopt an intracellular lifestyle and get internalized inside various host cell types to replicate. Finally, pathogenic bacteria can get access to deeper tissues using various mechanisms to cross mucosal barriers and access the bloodstream, which is a gateway for all host organs [4].

Pathogens showing a variable expression of virulence factors have been observed. In fact, the expression of virulence factors depends largely on the environmental conditions. This expression of virulence genes is induced under conditions similar to those found at the site of invasion. Studies have demonstrated that a temperature of 37°C is a favorable growth condition for bacteria in intestinal epithelial cells, but bacteria grown at 30°C can be phenotypically avirulent and noninvasive [5]. The bacterium can be found either in the intestinal lumen, inside epithelial cells, phagocytes or in the bloodstream. The expression level of virulence factors in these different locations varies accordingly in order to counteract different host defense mechanisms, as reported earlier by Ribet and Cossart [4].

In this study, Shigella strains causing bacteremia were characterized using RNA-Sequencing to identify genes that are differentially expressed based on the site of infection. The genes responsible for invasion, virulence, stress, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and other genes involved in cellular metabolism are also discussed.

Materials & methods

Strains

This study reports four cases of Shigella bacteremia diagnosed between the years 2015 and 2018. The identified isolates include two isolates each of S. flexneri serotype 2 and S. dysenteriae serotype 9. The isolates were confirmed by standard biochemical tests [6]. The isolate was serotyped using commercial antisera as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). For transcriptome analysis, stool (FC3355) and blood (BA42767) samples of the sole patient were studied further. Patient’s symptoms, clinical diagnosis and outcome were detailed in Table 1. The term invasive (sterile site) and noninvasive (nonsterile site) refer to the pathogen isolation site in this study.

Table 1. . Case details of Shigellemia reported in this study.

ID Year Species Age/sex Unit GI symptoms Clinical diagnosis Outcome
BA12827 2015 S. flexneri 2 68/M Medicine No symptoms DM uncontrolled Expired
BA42767 FC3355 2015 S. dysenteriae 9 54/M Nephrology Fever, loose stool, vomiting Renal transplant on immunosuppressants Alive
BA21871 2016 S. dysenteriae 9 65/M Hematology Acute gastroenteritis Multiple myloma, Shigella septicemia Alive
BA10746 2018 S. flexneri 2 27/M Medicine No symptoms Presented with cognitive behavior, decreased appetite Alive

Isolate sequenced.

BA: Blood; DM: Diabetes mellitus; FC: Feces; GI: Gastrointestinal.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates against ampicillin (10 μg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), cefpodoxime (10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg) and piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg) was performed using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. The results were interpreted using breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Guidelines 2018 [7]. Quality control strains used were Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 for the antibiotics tested.

AMR genes PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted using the QiaSymphony DNA extraction platform (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The isolates were screened for the presence of AMR (dhfr1A, sulII, blaOXA. blaCTX-M-1 and qnrS) genes by PCR as described earlier [8,9].

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit (Cat#74106, Qiagen, GmBH, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The RNA was checked using the Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometric Quantitation kit (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium).

RNA-sequencing & analysis

The invasive traits of selected isolates were studied by comparing the differential gene expression profile of the strain isolated exclusively from stool and blood specimen concurrently by transcriptomics. RNA-sequencing procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Ion Torrent (PGM) sequencer with 400-bp read chemistry (Life Technologies, CA, USA) [10]. The quality and quantity of each library was determined at each step with a Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer. De novo assembly using AssemblerSPAdes and annotation through RNA-Seq analysis was performed in PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource.

Statistical analysis

In this study, greater than twofold changes in the gene expression level between two variables was considered significant. Results were analyzed for correlation and tested for significance by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). SPSS 16.0 and Microsoft Excel 2007 (IL, USA) were used for the statistical evaluation.

Results & discussion

Shigella infection is in the majority confined to the GI tract which invades the colonic mucosa but rarely penetrates further into deeper tissues [11]. This study discusses four cases of Shigella bacteremia. The risk factors observed in these patients were diabetes, malignancy and immunosuppressant therapy. Previous literatures on mechanisms of pathogenesis have been described for S. flexneri. However, the present study has shown the invasion process of S. dysenteriae serotype 9.

AMR gene PCR

Among the four isolates studied, only two isolates harbored AMR genes that codes for β-lactams, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, fluroquinolones and cephalosporins, whereas no AMR genes were identified in the other two isolates. The resistance genes obtained in this study were found to be a common profile seen in the genus. The results were given in Table 2. AMR was generally more common in Shigella than in other enteric bacteria [12].

Table 2. . Antimicrobial resistance profile of the study isolates.

Sample ID Species Resistant profile AMR genes
BA12827 S. flexneri 2 R– CPD, CIP; MS - GEN, AK, P/T blaOXA. sulII, dhfr1a, qnrS, blaCTX-M-1
BA42767 F3355 S. dysenteriae 9 R – NAL, GEN, AK
BA21871 S. dysenteriae 9 R – SXT; MS - CIP, OFL, TAX, FEP, NAL sulII, dhfr1a, qnrS
BA10746 S. flexneri 2 R – AMP

AMP: Ampicillin; AK: Amikacin; BA: Blood; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; CPD: Cefpodoxime; FC: Feces; FEP: Cefepime; GEN: Gentamicin; MS: Moderate susceptible; NAL: Nalidixic acid; OFL: Ofloxacin; P/T: Piperacillin/tazobactam; R: Resistant; SXT: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TAX: Cefotaxime.

Differential gene expression analysis

S. dysenteriae serotype 9 obtained from stool and blood specimen of the single patient was studied. In RNA-Seq analysis, significant fold change was observed between non-invasive Sd_FC3355 and invasive Sd_BA42767 strains for the genes involved in invasion, virulence, motility and other cellular processes. Totally 56 genes were differentially expressed between the strains. Of these, few genes were expressed only in invasive strain Sd_BA42767 like csp, dcm, hisE and enterotoxin genes with reduced expression, this showed the significance of these genes in the invasive phenotype of the strain. The majority of the genes (44/56 genes) were highly expressed in non-invasive isolate from the gut, which is the primary site of invasion for Shigella infection. Genes with no expression data were excluded from the analysis. The genes analysed were given as a supplementary material.

Motility-associated genes

Shigella pathogenesis involves bacterial invasion and spread through colonic mucosa [13]. Shigella spp. are able to move through the cytoplasm of host cells and into adjacent cells by polymerizing actin [14] which is mediated by IcsA (virG), encoded on the 220-kb virulence plasmid [15,16]. We observed that IcsA protein was expressed only in noninvasive Shigella isolate (Table 3). This correlates with the fact that IcsA is required for inter- and intracellular spreading of Shigella within the host intestinal epithelium. VirK gene, which is required for post-transcriptional regulation of icsA expression, has also been expressed.

Table 3. . Gene expression profile of the two selected isolates represented in fold change.

Genes Product Fold change
    Sd_FC3355 Sd_BA42767
SDY_0834/ipaH_1 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 6 61
SDY_1062/ipaH_3 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 2 17
SDY_2001/ipaH_4 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 3 0
SDY_2003/ipaH_5 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 11 0
SDY_2753/ipaH_6 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 26 0
SDY_P003/ospB Hypothetical protein 5 0
SDY_P004/phoN2/apy  Hypothetical protein 18 0
SDY_P010/ospD2 Enterotoxin 40 45
SDY_P023/ospD1 OspD1 361 0
SDY_P025/ipgB2 Putative chaperone (IpgB2) 1672 0
SDY_P037/ipaH4.5 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 20 0
SDY_P038/ipaH7.8 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 23 0
SDY_P045/ipaH1.4 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 21 0
SDY_P055/ospC1 Hypothetical protein 15 0
SDY_P056/ospD3 Enterotoxin 16 10
SDY_P070/ospC2 Hypothetical protein 1111 0
SDY_P099/ipaH9.8 Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 17 0
SDY_P109/virK Virulence factor VirK 365 236
SDY_P140/ipaH Invasion plasmid antigen/internalin, putative 98 0
SDY_P151/ospC3 Hypothetical protein 224 0
SDY_P160/ipaJ UDP-sugar hydrolase (EC 3.6.1.45); 5′-nucleotidase (EC 3.1.3.5) 1170 0
SDY_P161/virB Chromosome (plasmid) partitioning protein ParB 76 0
SDY_P163/ipaA Hypothetical protein 54 0
SDY_P164/ipaD Type III secretion host injection protein (YopB) 179 0
SDY_P165/ipaC Hypothetical protein 1244 0
SDY_P166/ipaB Cell invasion protein SipB 1582 0
SDY_P167/ipgC Type III secretion chaperone protein for YopD (SycD) 937 0
SDY_P169/ipgA Chaperone ipgA 613 0
SDY_P170/icsB Hypothetical protein 495 0
SDY_P171/ipgD Inositol phosphate phosphatase ipgD (EC 3.1.3) 3399 0
SDY_P173/ipgF Invasion protein IagB precursor 3235 0
SDY_P174/mxiG Hypothetical protein 1611 0
SDY_P175/mxiH MxiH protein 1450 0
SDY_P177/mxiJ Type III secretion bridge between inner and outermembrane lipoprotein (YscJ, HrcJ, EscJ, PscJ) 1457 0
SDY_P179/mxiN MxiN 1476 0
SDY_P183/mxiD Type III secretion outermembrane pore-forming protein (YscC, MxiD, HrcC, InvG) 334 0
SDY_P184/mxiC Type III secretion outermembrane contact-sensing protein (yopN, Yop4b, LcrE) 355 0
SDY_P185/mxiA Type III secretion inner membrane channel protein (LcrD, HrcV, EscV, SsaV) 160 0
SDY_P186/spa15 Spa15 185 0
SDY_P187/spa47 Type III secretion cytoplasmic ATP synthase (EC 3.6.3.14, YscN, SpaL, MxiB, HrcN, EscN) 483 0
SDY_P189/spa32 Hypothetical protein 308 0
SDY_P190/spa33 Type III secretion innermembrane protein (YscQ, homologous to flagellar export components) 233 0
SDY_P191/spaP Type III secretion innermembrane protein (YscR, SpaR, HrcR, EscR, homologous to flagellar export components); surface presentation of antigens protein SpaP 116 0
SDY_P191a/spa9 Surface presentation of antigens protein SpaQ 71 0
SDY_P192/spa29 Type III secretion innermembrane protein (YscT, HrcT, SpaR, EscT, EpaR1, homologous to flagellar export components) 28 0
SDY_P193/spa40 Type III secretion innermembrane protein (YscU, SpaS, EscU, HrcU, SsaU, homologous to flagellar export components) 33 0
SDY_P211/virA Hypothetical protein 43 0
SDY_P214/icsA Hypothetical protein 469 0
SDY_P224/icsP Protease VII (Omptin) precursor (EC 3.4.23.49) 461 0
SD1617_4624/ Virulence factor MviM 0 95
SD1617_3340/ Enterotoxin 0 3
/ Enterotoxin 0 2
SD1617_0737/ilvB Acetolactate synthase large subunit (EC 2.2.1.6) 81 476
SD1617_0939/ilvD Dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.9) 91 405
SD1617_0940/ilvA Threonine dehydratase biosynthetic (EC 4.3.1.19) 59 380
SD1617_0942/ilvC Ketol-acid reductoisomerase (EC 1.1.1.86) 133 268
SD1617_0938/ilvE Branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.42) 58 225
SD1617_3738/ilvN Acetolactate synthase small subunit (EC 2.2.1.6) 41 7
/ IlvBN operon leader peptide 0 687
SDY_2022/phoP Transcriptional regulatory protein PhoP 222 472
SDY_2023/phoQ Sensor histidine kinase PhoQ (EC 2.7.13.3) 136 117
SDY_3003/barA Signal transduction histidine-protein kinase BarA (EC 2.7.13.3) 24 13
SDY_1104/uvrY BarA-associated response regulator UvrY (= GacA = SirA) 261 314
SDY_2892/csrA Carbon storage regulator 1021 662
SD1617_4387/hisF Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase cyclase subunit (EC 4.1.3) 31 189
SD1617_4390/hisB Histidinol-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.15)/imidazoleglycerol-phosphate dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.19) 28 186
SD1617_4391/hisC Histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.9) 13 161
SD1617_4388/hisA Phosphoribosylformimino-5-aminoimidazole carboxamide ribotide isomerase (EC 5.3.1.16) 28 132
SD1617_4392/hisD Histidinol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.23) 3 132
SD1617_4386/hisE Phosphoribosyl-AMP cyclohydrolase (EC 3.5.4.19)/phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase (EC 3.6.1.31) 0 96
SD1617_4393/hisG ATP phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.17) - HisGl 5 399
SDY_2218/hisH Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase amidotransferase subunit (EC 2.4.2) 22 254
SD1617_4262/ Cold shock protein of CSP family - CspA (naming convention as in E. coli) 3991 2120
SDY_2381/cspD Cold shock protein CspD 229 145
SDY_0546/cspE Cold shock protein CspE 1714 222
SD1617_4774/ Cold shock protein of CSP family - CspC (naming convention as in E. coli) 0 2569
SDY_4448/groES Heat shock protein 60 family co-chaperone GroES 3531 2405
SDY_4449/groEL Heat shock protein 60 family chaperone GroEL 3994 3209
SDY_4172/ibpB 16 kDa heat shock protein B 146 91
SDY_4173/ibpA 16 kDa heat shock protein A 190 170
SDY_2787/grpE Heat shock protein GrpE 491 409
  Heat shock protein C 6 15
SDY_3677/hslO 33 kDa chaperonin (Heat shock protein 33) (HSP33) 274 133
SD1617_5932/dcm DNA-cytosine methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.37) 0 117
SDY_4150/uhpA Transcriptional regulatory protein UhpA 17 55
SDY_4659/creB Response regulator CreB of two-component signal transduction system CreBC 42 25
SDY_4658/creA Conserved uncharacterized protein CreA 120 122
SDY_4477/evgA Positive transcription regulator EvgA 176 41
SDY_4478/evgS Hybrid sensory histidine kinase in two-component regulatory system with EvgA 12 12
SDY_3723/hydH Sensor protein of zinc sigma-54-dependent two-component system 68 54
SDY_3722/hydG Response regulator of zinc sigma-54-dependent two-component system 76 40
SDY_1275/narL Nitrate/nitrite response regulator protein NarL 66 19
SDY_1276/narX Nitrate/nitrite sensor protein NarX 31 34
SDY_3874/glnL Nitrogen regulation protein NtrB (EC 2.7.13.3) 69 67
SDY_3875/glnG Nitrogen regulation protein NtrC 82 106
SDY_3214/ygiX Two-component system response regulator QseB 25 33
SDY_3213/qseC Sensory histidine kinase QseC 21 24
SDY_0856/rcsC Sensor histidine kinase RcsC (EC 2.7.13.3) 32 32
SDY_0857/rcsB DNA-binding capsular synthesis response regulator RcsB 870 899
SDY_1824/rstA Transcriptional regulatory protein RstA 86 54
SDY_1825/rstB Sensory histidine kinase in two-component regulatory system with RstA 60 56
SDY_2744/yfhA Transcriptional response regulatory protein GlrR 44 41
SDY_2746/yfhK Sensor histidine kinase GlrK 64 48
SDY_4443/dcuA C4-dicarboxylate transporter DcuA 225 250
SDY_2186/baeR Response regulator BaeR 53 34
SDY_2187/baeS Sensory histidine kinase BaeS 6 1
SDY_1046/vsr Very-short-patch mismatch repair endonuclease (Guanine–Thymine [G–T] specific) 0 28
SDY_1047/yedA Uncharacterized innermembrane transporter YedA 0 0
SDY_1048/yedI Innermembrane protein YedI 0 0
SDY_1970/ Uncharacterized protein YobF 30 2205

0: Not expressed.

Virulence/invasion associated genes

Shigella virulence plasmid is an essential virulence determinant of the species and encodes the molecular machinery necessary for tissue invasion and intracellular survival. The virulence plasmid encodes the 30 kb Mxi-Spa type III secretion system (T3SS) and invasion plasmid antigens (Ipa proteins) required for invasion of the colonic and rectal epithelial cells and cell-to-cell spread of the bacteria, resulting in the symptoms of bacillary dysentery [17,18]. Shigella pathogenesis mainly relies on the Mxi-Spa T3SS and its effector proteins [19]. The invasion plasmid antigen (ipaH) gene, which was reported to be carried by all four Shigella species, was found to be highly expressed in invasive isolate in this study, whereas ipaD, a host injection protein was expressed only in noninvasive isolate. Further, ipgA, B, C, D, F known to facilitate local invasion in to epithelial cells, were also expressed only in noninvasive isolates (Table 3). Therefore, the virulence plasmid is the key molecular signature of Shigella spp. pathogenesis and is fundamental for initiating infection and manipulating the immune response of the host [18].

PhoQ/PhoP is a two-component system that governs virulence and regulates several cellular activities in Shigella spp. [20]. In the present study, PhoP was highly expressed in invasive isolate, whereas PhoQ showed no significant difference in the expression level. In addition, BarA-UvrY two-component system was shown to have increased expression in invasive isolate. This system also controls the activity of CsrA (carbon storage regulator) protein which regulates carbon metabolism, flagellar biosynthesis and biofilm formation. This process has been previously reported in uropathogenic E. coli [21]. We observed that CsrA protein was upregulated in noninvasive isolate.

Stress-associated genes

Bacteria have developed a number of mechanisms to adapt the changing environmental conditions within the cells. One such mechanism is the production of small cold shock proteins (Csp) to counteract the sudden temperature downshift. Csps have been shown to contribute to osmotic, oxidative, starvation, pH and ethanol stress tolerance as well as to host cell invasion [22]. CspA is a major cold shock protein, first described in E. coli [22] was found to have significant differences in the expression level between the invasive and noninvasive isolate. Similarly, CspD and CspE proteins showed significant differences in their expressions, whereas CspC was highly and solely expressed in invasive isolate (Table 3). Another defense mechanism against various environmental stresses is the production of heat shock proteins. Heat shock proteins that are important for cell survival and are usually related to the virulence of the pathogens have been expressed in both the isolates [23].

Genes involved in metabolism

In this study, ilv proteins such as ilvA, B, C, D, E and N involved in amino acid biosynthesis showed significantly increased expression in invasive isolate. Histidine (his) proteins like hisA, B, C, D, E, F, G and H were found to have significant upregulation in invasive isolate. Further, member of the two-component regulatory system NtrB/NtrC and other regulator proteins like NarL and NarX involved in the regulation of nitrogen was expressed in both the isolates with no significant difference in the expression level. Similarly, several other genes such as (ygiX, qseC, rcsC, rcsB, rstA, rstB, yfhA, yfhK, dcuA, baeR, baeS, vsr) were present but showed no significant difference between the isolates.

Cellular process & signaling

During Shigella infection, certain effector proteins promote cell survival. IpgD which associated with increased intracellular bacterial replication [24] was highly and solely expressed in noninvasive isolate as expected. Further ospC and virA were also found to be expressed in noninvasive isolate [24]. DNA methylation is an important component in numerous cellular processes and plays an important role in regulating gene expression [25,26]. DNA cytosine methyltransferase protein was only slightly expressed in invasive isolate in this study.

Uncharacterized genes

Two genes encoding uncharacterized proteins were identified. Uncharacterized innermembrane transporter YedA gene was not expressed in the study isolates, which has been previously identified as hypothetical protein in S. dysenteriae strain Sd197. Another gene named YobF, which is a small protein with no known function showed significantly increased expression in invasive isolate. Yet the functions of these genes remain obscure.

Conclusion & future perspective

Shigella spp. is a highly contagious pathogen and humans are the only reservoir that spreads through fecal–oral contamination. The invasive ability of this pathogen is a key determinant in the establishment of the disease. The invasive phenotype of Shigella spp. is linked to the expression of various effector/regulatory genes. The differential protein expression by S. dysenteriae serotype 9 observed in this study suggests that it has a specific response to particular intracellular environment. Notably, many uncharacterized genes with unknown functions demonstrate the complexity of the regulatory network in S. dysenteriae. These genes needs to be further characterized to understand unidentified strategies for infection and successful survival of this pathogen. Further, the in vivo mechanism of S. dysenteriae invasion are difficult to fully study until the intracellular environment is mimicked in vitro. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Indian study that compares the gene expression profile of clinical S. dysenteriae serotype 9 with respect to their invasion.

Executive summary.

  • Most of the earlier studies on mechanisms underlying pathogenesis was derived from Shigella flexneri. However, the present study shows the invasion process of Shigella dysenteriae serotype 9.

  • RNA sequencing was done to study the differential expression of genes involved in the invasion process of the pathogen with the respect to the infection site.

  • On virulence analysis, enterotoxin gene (set) and invasion associated genes such as ipaH and ial was identified in two, one and three isolates, respectively.

  • For antimicrobial resistance, only two isolates harbored genes that codes for β-lactams, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, fluroquinolones and cephalosporins resistance.

  • RNA-Seq analysis showed significant fold change between noninvasive Sd_FC3355 and invasive Sd_BA42767 strains for the genes involved in invasion, virulence, motility and other cellular processes.

  • Majority of the genes (44/56 genes) were highly expressed in noninvasive isolate, which is the primary site of invasion for Shigella spp. Few genes were expressed only in invasive isolate Sd_BA42767, which shows the significance of these genes in the invasive phenotype of the strain.

  • This study explores that Shigella spp. has a specific response to particular intracellular environment.

  • The identification of genes with uncharacterized functions demonstrates the complexity of the regulatory network in S. dysenteriae.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Institutional Review Board for approving the study and the department of Clinical Microbiology for providing lab space and facilities.

Footnotes

Author contributions

B Veeraraghavan and S Anandan conceptualized the study. DP Muthuirulandi Sethuvel and NK Devanga Ragupathi analyzed, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. DP Muthuirulandi Sethuvel carried out bench work and generated data. B Veeraraghavan, MM Ninan and JS Michael critically revised and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Open access

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The raw sequence data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under Accession No. SRR6031691 (BA42767) and SRR6031692 (FC3355).

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

  • 1.Sambe-Ba B, Espie E, Faye ME. et al. Community-acquired diarrhea among children and adults in urban settings in Senegal: clinical, epidemiological and microbiological aspects. BMC Infect. Dis. 13, 580 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thompson CN, Duy PT, Baker S. The rising dominance of Shigella sonnei: an intercontinental shift in the etiology of bacillary dysentery. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003708 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jain S, Sharma M, Gupta R, Shree N, Kumar M. Multidrug resistant Shigella flexneri: a rare case of septicemia in an infant. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 8, DD03 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ribet D, Cossart P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microb. Infect. 17, 173–183 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Provides the detailed description of pathogenesis of Shigella in humans.
  • 5.Zhao G, Zhu L, Feng E. et al. A novel anti-virulence gene revealed by proteomic analysis in Shigella flexneri 2a. Proteome Sci. 8, 30 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bopp CA, Brenner FW, Fields PL. et al. Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella. : Manual of Clinical Microbiology (8th Edition). Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen J, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH. (). American Society for Microbiology, DC, USA, 654–671 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement M100-S28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, MI, USA: (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thong KL, Hoe SLL, Puthucheary SD, Yasin RM. Detection of virulence genes in Malaysian Shigella species by multiplex PCR assay. BMC Infect. Dis. 5, 8 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Describes the application of multiplex PCR for the detection of important Shigella virulence genes.
  • 9.Anandan S, Sethuvel DPM, Gajendiren R, Verghese VP, Walia K, Veeraraghavan B. Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in clinical Shigella isolates during 2014 and 2015: trends in South India. Germs 7, 115 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Reports the prevalence of various antimicrobial resistance genes among Shigella spp. in India.
  • 10.Castro TL, Seyffert N, Ramos RT. et al. Ion Torrent-based transcriptional assessment of a Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis equi strain reveals denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography a promising rRNA depletion method. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 168–177 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carayol N, Van Nhieu GT. The inside story of Shigella invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 3, a016717 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mamatha B, Rituparna C. Decreased susceptibility to antimicrobials among Shigella flexneri isolates in Manipal, South India – a 5 year hospital based study. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 43, 1447 (2012). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldberg MB, Theriot JA. Shigella flexneri surface protein IcsA is sufficient to direct actin-based motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6572–6576 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Magdalena J, Goldberg MB. Quantification of Shigella IcsA required for bacterial actin polymerization. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 51, 187–196 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Purdy GE, Fisher CR, Payne SM. IcsA surface presentation in Shigella flexneri requires the periplasmic chaperones DegP, Skp, and SurA. J. Bacteriol. 189, 5566–5573 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teh MY, Morona R. Identification of Shigella flexneri IcsA residues affecting interaction with N-WASP, and evidence for IcsA–IcsA co-operative interaction. PLoS ONE 8, e55152 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang F, Yang J, Zhang X. et al. Genome dynamics and diversity of Shigella species, the etiologic agents of bacillary dysentery. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6445–6458 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 235 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yang SC, Hung CF, Aljuffali IA, Fang JY. The roles of the virulence factor IpaB in Shigella spp. in the escape from immune cells and invasion of epithelial cells. Microbiol. Res. 181, 43–51 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cai X, Zhang J, Chen M. et al. The effect of the potential PhoQ histidine kinase inhibitors on Shigella flexneri virulence. PLoS ONE 6, e23100 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Palaniyandi S, Mitra A, Herren CD. et al. BarA-UvrY two-component system regulates virulence of uropathogenic E. coli CFT073. PLoS ONE 7, e31348 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keto-Timonen R, Hietala N, Palonen E, Hakakorpi A, Lindstrom M, Korkeala H. Cold shock proteins: a minireview with special emphasis on Csp-family of enteropathogenic Yersinia. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1151 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harikrishnan H, Ismail A, Singh KKB. Temperature-regulated expression of outer membrane proteins in Shigella flexneri. Gut Pathog. 5, 38 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lu R, Herrera BB, Eshleman HD. et al. Shigella effector OspB activates mTORC1 in a manner that depends on IQGAP1 and promotes cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005200 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lim DH, Maher ER. DNA methylation: a form of epigenetic control of gene expression. Obstet. Gynecol. 12, 37–42 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gomez-Eichelmann MC, Levy-Mustri A, Ramirez-Santos J. Presence of 5-methylcytosine in CC (A/T) GG sequences (Dcm methylation) in DNAs from different bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 173, 7692–7694 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Future Science OA are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES