Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0231040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231040

MiRNA profiles in blood plasma from mother-child duos in human biobanks and the implication of sample quality: Circulating miRNAs as potential early markers of child health

Lene B Dypås 1,*, Kristine B Gützkow 1, Ann-Karin Olsen 1, Nur Duale 1,*
Editor: Zhong-Cheng Luo2
PMCID: PMC7117735  PMID: 32240265

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been linked to several diseases and to regulation of almost every biological process. This together with their stability while freely circulating in blood suggests that they could serve as minimal-invasive biomarkers for a wide range of diseases. Successful miRNA-based biomarker discovery in plasma is dependent on controlling sources of preanalytical variation, such as cellular contamination and hemolysis, as they can be major causes of altered miRNA expression levels. Analysis of plasma quality is therefore a crucial step for the best output when searching for novel miRNA biomarkers.

Methods

Plasma quality was assessed by three different methods in samples from mother-child duos (maternal and cord blood, N = 2x38), with collection and storage methods comparable to large cohort study biobanks. Total RNA was isolated and the expression profiles of 201 miRNAs was obtained by qPCR to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in cord and maternal plasma samples.

Results

All three methods for quality assurance indicate that the plasma samples used in this study are of high quality with very low levels of contamination, suitable for analysis of circulating miRNAs. We identified 19 significantly differentially expressed miRNAs between cord and maternal plasma samples (paired t-tests, FDR<0.05, and fold change>±1.5), and we observed low correlation of miRNA transcript levels between cord and maternal samples throughout our dataset.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that good quality plasma samples suitable for miRNA profiling can be achieved from samples collected and stored by large biobanks. Incorporation of extensive quality control measures, such as those established here, would be beneficial for future projects. The overall low correlation of miRNA expression between cord and maternal samples is an interesting observation, and promising for our future studies on identification of miRNA-based biomarkers in cord blood plasma, considering that these samples were collected at term and some exchange of blood components between cord and maternal blood frequently occur.

Introduction

The finding of circulating microRNAs (miRNA) in body fluids (blood plasma, serum or urine) [1, 2] has opened up for the possibility of using blood-based miRNAs as a new approach for diagnostic screening. MiRNAs have been linked to cancer and several other diseases [3], and they have been implicated in promoting neurodevelopmental processes, such as neurogenesis, synapse precursor formation, and synaptic plasticity [4, 5]. The stability of miRNAs circulating in blood, and their role as key regulators of almost every biological process, including precise control of neuronal gene expression and thus fine-tuning signaling pathways [6], suggests that they could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for a wide range of diseases [79], and possibly help explain basic disease etiology. Furthermore, miRNAs have been shown to be targeted by epigenetic modification, and in turn, miRNAs can target regulators of epigenetic pathways [10, 11].

Blood-based biobanks, which include collection of umbilical cord blood, such as the Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) biobank [12] at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), and other multi-center studies, increasingly incorporate studies identifying candidate mRNA and miRNA expression profile-based biomarkers for a wide range of disorders. The combination of biological specimens and questionnaire data on lifestyle and exposures in MoBa provide unique possibilities to study the effects of many factors of relevance for pregnancy outcome, health and disease. Identification of biomarkers in an easily accessible and minimally invasive biological sample such as umbilical cord blood would be a valuable complementing tool for early diagnostics and prognostics of different types of diseases and other potential adverse health effects. However, reliable quantification of mRNA and miRNA levels requires high-quality RNA, and compromised RNA integrity has been shown to influence such quantification [1315]. Previously, we reported that intact and high-quality RNA suitable for mRNA profiling analyses was obtained from blood samples collected in Tempus tubes and stored at -80°C over a period of up to six years [16]. Different RNA isolation methods have also been compared for quality and yield when isolating from blood samples collected in Tempus tubes and stored in biobanks [17]. However, the blood plasma RNA isolation protocol should be optimized in terms of RNA quality and the amount of plasma needed for miRNA expression profile analysis.

In this study we took advantage of plasma samples collected in an earlier pilot study, with routines for sample collection, preparation and storage comparable to those used in MoBa. The aim was to establish a suitable protocol for plasma quality control and isolation of total RNA (including miRNAs) from blood plasma, in order to optimize the use of precious samples collected in MoBa and other biobanks for studies on miRNA expression. When working with plasma it is essential to ensure that the isolated miRNA reflects freely circulating miRNA levels. Poor procedures for blood collection and plasma preparation can cause contamination from cells, blood platelets, other microparticles (MPs), or from hemolysis, and skew the resulting miRNA profiles [18, 19]. We therefore performed thorough plasma quality assessment using three different methods. In addition, we analyzed miRNA expression levels to investigate differences and similarities in cord and maternal blood plasma, as we are interested in using miRNA expression profiles in cord blood plasma as a reflection of epigenetic conditions in the newborn child.

The knowledge gained from this study will facilitate and optimize plasma quality assurance and total RNA isolation and analysis in future cohort studies on miRNA expression profiles in plasma samples, especially in cord blood. The protocol established in this study will be the basis for a large project where plasma miRNA profiles will be analyzed in 3600 samples to identify early potential markers of ADHD in children and help further elucidate the role of miRNAs in neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as many other complex disease etiologies. A limited literature search in PubMed did not result in any peer-reviewed publications on plasma miRNA profiling analyzed in cord and maternal samples (harvested around the time of birth) at the same time, and to our knowledge, this is the first time such analysis has been performed.

Methods

Study population and sample collection

The current study is based on a small pilot cohort study that was established by collecting maternal and cord blood samples from MoBa-enrolled mothers giving birth at the Oslo University Hospital at the ABC-clinic, Ullevål. MoBa is a prospective population-based pregnancy cohort study conducted by the NIPH. Participants were recruited from all over Norway from 1999 to 2008, and the cohort now includes more than 114.500 children, 95.200 mothers, and 75.200 fathers [12]. Biological material in the form of whole blood and plasma has been collected from the mother, the father, and the child (umbilical cord blood) and stored in the biobank, together with extracted DNA, for future use [16, 20, 21].

The pilot cohort study was initiated in order to develop good logistics and establish methods used for a larger sampling project at a later stage [22, 23]. Maternal and cord blood samples (50 pairs) were collected in CPT-tubes (BD Vacutainer® CPTTM Cell Preparation Tube, a blood collection tube containing citrate anticoagulant with FICOLLTM) at the hospital immediately after birth and the plasma was pulled off by centrifugation at 1700 g for 30 minutes without break. The plasma samples were aliquoted and stored at −20°C for later analysis. The samples were collected in the period between June 2007 and February 2008. Only 38 of the original 50 sample pairs were used in this study due to sufficient volumes not being available for both maternal and cord samples in some pairs.

The establishment of MoBa and initial data collection was based on a license from the Norwegian Data Protection Agency and approval from the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics. The MoBa cohort is currently regulated by the Norwegian Health Registry Act. The pilot study and this current study have been approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics and the Data Inspectorate in Norway. Informed consent was collected from pregnant mothers in week 17–19.

RNA extraction protocol

Total RNA from blood plasma (200 μl) was extracted using miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (QIAGEN, Norway) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with some modifications: (i) Thawed plasma samples were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 16,000 g at 4°C before supernatant was transferred to a new tube, (ii) 1.3 ng/μl MS2 carrier RNA was added to the QIAzol Lysis Reagent, and (iii) a custom spike-in control consisting of a pool of three synthetic C. elegans miRNAs (cel-miR-39, -45, and -238) was used. The isolated RNA was stored at– 80°C until further processing.

Quantitative real-time PCR assay

cDNA synthesis was performed with 5μl total RNA as template, using miScript II RT Kit (QIAGEN, Norway) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A no reverse transcriptase control (NRT) was included and samples were incubated at 37°C for 60 min and at 95°C for 5 min. The cDNA concentration and quality was assessed by a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Norway). The prepared cDNA was stored at -20°C until analysis.

The real-time qPCR analysis was carried out as previously described [17] in 384-well plates using miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Norway) on a CFX384 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Norway). Serial dilutions of cDNA were prepared to determine the optimal dilution and a 1:40 dilution was selected. All samples, 38 maternal and 38 cord (n = 76), were analyzed on the same 384‐well plate to reduce the influence of run-to-run variations. The expression profiles of 204 miRNA assays, including three spike-in controls (cel-miR-39, cel-miR-45, and cel-miR-238), were obtained using this qPCR layout. These miRNAs were selected based on their expression abundance in human blood plasma/serum and literature search [24, 25]. The miRNA-specific primers were designed based on sequences obtained from the miRBase database (miRBase 20 released; http://www.mirbase.org/)) and primers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Norway). Non-template controls (NTC) and melting curve (Tm) analysis were included in each qPCR run.

Plasma quality control

Plasma quality was assessed using three methods: (i) The presence of residual platelets and microparticles in the plasma samples was measured using a CASY Cell Counter and Analyzer Model TT (Roche, Norway). Analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a 45 μm capillary, a 1:2000 dilution with CASYton, a sample volume of 200 μl, and two repeated measurements. (ii) The degree of hemolysis was assessed by measuring oxyhemoglobin absorbance at 414 nm. Absorbance (220–750 nm) of the plasma (1.5 μl) was measured on a NanoDropTM 1000 Spectrophotometer (Fisher Scientific, Norway) using the UV-VIS module. (iii) Additional hemolysis control was assessed by comparing the expression of hsa-miR-451, known to be enriched in erythrocytes, with the expression of hsa-miR-23a, that has been found to be relatively stable in plasma and not affected by hemolysis [24]; i.e ΔCq (Cq: quantification cycle) = Cqhsa-miR-23a - Cqhsa-miR-451, as a measure of hemolysis. A ΔCq value below five, between five and seven, and above seven, indicates low, moderate, and high possibility of miRNA contamination from hemolysis, respectively.

In the two methods assessing degree of hemolysis, an additional plasma sample was included as reference for hemolysis. Blood was collected from an adult female volunteer and plasma was prepared after vigorously shaking the blood sample to introduce hemolysis.

Data analysis

The Cq-values were recorded with CFX Manager™ Software (Bio-Rad, Norway). The qPCR data analysis was performed as previously described [17] by the comparative Cq-method [26, 27] using cel-miR-39, -45, and -238 from the custom spike-in control as reference.

The raw Cq-values from 204 miRNAs (including cel-miR-39, -45, and -238) were pre-processed and miRNAs with inadequate measurements, such as miRNAs with contaminated NTCs, multiple melting temperature (Tm) peaks, and Tm variation > 1°C, were removed. Cq-values above 37 cycles were considered beyond the limit of detection (LOD) and removed from downstream analysis. Due to the nature of this study where we are investigating paired data, all miRNAs with missing values for one or more samples were removed to increase strength. The outcome of these strict quality assurance filtering criteria was an expression matrix consisting of 61 miRNAs x 76 samples (38 cord and 38 maternal) that was used in the downstream analysis (S1 Table). The Cq-values for target miRNAs were first normalized with the custom spike-in controls, and then normalized relative quantity (NRQ) was calculated by following the formula NRQ = 2Cq (where ΔCq = Cq (target)—Cq (global mean), and “global mean” is the mean for each target across all samples).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of miRNA expression levels was carried out by paired t-tests to compare the expression level in cord samples to maternal samples, followed by multiple testing correction using Benjamini-Hochberg with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%. A paired t-test was chosen due to dependency between the mother and child, and due to the objective being to find statistically significant differences within mother-child pairs. Linear regression analysis was also performed, both on the entire data set and for each miRNA, to investigate the degree of correlation for miRNA expression in cord and maternal blood plasma. NRQ-values were log2 transformed to obtain normal distribution prior to analysis, and normality was evaluated using Normal Quantile plots. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro version 14.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and R version 3.6.1 [28].

Results and discussion

Plasma quality control

Successful biomarker discovery depends on controlling sources of preanalytical variation. Plasma quality assessment is therefore important in order to assure that the isolated miRNA reflects freely circulating miRNA, and not contamination from cells or microparticles (MPs) leading to variations in analysis results not related to any biological differences. Suboptimal preanalytical handling of blood plasma can lead to miRNA contamination from cells not thoroughly removed or from high levels of blood platelets and MPs. Hemolysis is another issue that affects blood plasma quality, as contents from erythrocytes then leak out prior to isolation of the plasma. It has been shown that hemolysis may lead to large overestimations of the abundance of miRNAs present in plasma [18]. In addition to this, the concentration of miRNAs in plasma is very low, and combined with the limited availability of biological material from cohort biobanks, it is essential that these small volumes received from a biobank are of good quality.

Plasma quality was assessed using three different approaches; measuring the presence of MPs, assessing the degree of hemolysis by spectrophotometric analysis, and comparing transcript levels of a miRNA abundant in erythrocytes to transcript levels of a miRNA relatively stably expressed in plasma, as a complementary assessment of hemolysis.

First, the presence of residual platelets or MPs in plasma samples from cord and maternal blood was measured using a CASY Cell Counter and Analyzer Model TT. Detected particles were for the most part smaller than 2 μm in diameter, with counts/μl peaking at ~1 μm across samples (Fig 1). This peak is equivalent to blood MPs, which are smaller than 1.5 μm [29]. The source of MPs in blood is plasma membrane fragments, released from cellular components of blood due to cell stimulation, activation, degeneration, and apoptosis. Exosomes, smaller extracellular vesicles (size; 30–150 nm) that carry miRNA, are also present in plasma [30], but their size is below the limit of detection (LOD = 0.7 μm) for our assay. However, we are interested in the total levels of extracellular miRNAs present in plasma, including those encapsulated in exosomes, and no measures were made in the pre-analytical steps to remove these vesicles. An interesting mention regarding exosomes and miRNAs is a study investigating exosomes in serum from both maternal and cord blood where they found slightly higher concentrations of exosomes in maternal samples compared to cord samples [31].

Fig 1. The presence of residual platelets and microparticles in plasma samples.

Fig 1

The presence of residual platelets and microparticles in (A) plasma samples from cord (n = 38) and (B) maternal blood (n = 38) was measured using a CASY Cell Counter and Analyzer Model TT with LOD = 0.7. Results are presented as counts/μl by particle diameter (μm).

Blood platelets, on the other hand, are 2–5 μm in size [32], and as shown in Fig 1, blood platelets have been largely removed from the analyzed plasma samples by an extra centrifugation step added to the protocol prior to isolation of RNA. A normal platelet count in blood is between 150.000 and 450.000 platelets/μl, and the observed total particle count in the 2–5 μm size range for the analyzed plasma samples was between 252 and 46.008 counts/μl, with a median of 3.301 counts/μl, suggesting that blood platelets were largely removed from our plasma samples.

Furthermore, maternal samples contained more MPs compared to cord blood plasma (Fig 1) and displayed a large variance between samples. The cord blood samples seem to be more homogenous with respect to MP content. Nine maternal plasma samples (~12% of samples) had particle counts above 10.000 counts/μl, which is considerably higher than the remaining samples. The observed high particle counts in maternal samples is not unexpected, as the number of circulating blood MPs is usually elevated in pregnant women, with a peak in the 3rd trimester, due to enhanced release of MPs stimulated by inflammatory responses [33, 34]. Maternal blood samples used in this study were collected shortly after birth, and it is therefore reasonable to assume that the blood profile is reflective of pregnancy. MP concentration in newborn cord blood has been found comparable with MP concentration in adult (non-pregnant) plasma samples [35].

Secondly, the degree of hemolysis was assessed by measuring distinct oxyhemoglobin absorbance peaks at 414 nm. It has previously been proposed that data on the degree of hemolysis in plasma samples should always be provided when analyzing freely circulating miRNAs [36]. We agree that this is important in the reporting on this field of research, and a simple spectrophotometric analysis can easily be applied to achieve this. Absorbance (220–750 nm) of plasma from cord blood, maternal blood, and a reference sample (with intentionally induced hemolysis) was measured on a NanoDropTM 1000 Spectrophotometer using the UV-VIS module. Absorbance for the hemolyzed reference sample resulted in a distinct peak at 414 nm (Fig 2). When compared with the hemolyzed reference sample, cord and maternal samples had much lower absorbance at 414 nm (Fig 2). The average absorbance at 414 nm for the plasma samples from cord and maternal blood was 0.18 ±0.015 (range: 0.05–0.44) and 0.25 ±0.020 (range: 0.03–0.48), respectively. Absorbance at 414 nm for the hemolyzed reference sample was 1.12.

Fig 2. Spectrophotometric analysis of plasma to assess the degree of hemolysis from oxyhemoglobin absorbance at 414 nm.

Fig 2

Absorbance in plasma was measured for (A) cord blood (n = 38), (B) maternal blood (n = 38), and a hemolyzed reference sample (in red). Average absorbance at 414 nm for the plasma samples from cord and maternal blood was 0.18 ±0.015 (range: 0.05–0.44) and 0.25 ±0.020 (range: 0.03–0.48), respectively. Absorbance at 414 nm for the hemolyzed reference sample was 1.12.

Thirdly, an alternative and complementary hemolysis assessment was conducted by comparing the transcript level of hsa-miR-451, known to be abundant in erythrocytes, with the transcript level of hsa-miR-23a, which is relatively stably expressed in plasma and unaffected by hemolysis [24]. The calculated ΔCq value (Cqhsa-miR-23a - Cqhsa-miR-451) is a good indicator of the degree of hemolysis. A ΔCq value below five, between five and seven, and above seven, indicates low, moderate, and high probability of miRNA contamination from hemolysis, respectively. The average ΔCq values for the plasma samples from cord and maternal blood was 2.78 ±0.17 and 2.50 ±0.19, respectively, and all samples had a ΔCq below 5 (Fig 3). The ΔCq-value for the hemolyzed reference sample was 12.13.

Fig 3. Distribution of ΔCq = Cqhsa-miR-23a - Cqhsa-miR-451 in plasma samples as a measure of hemolysis.

Fig 3

The transcript level of hsa-miR-23a was compared with the transcript level of hsa-miR-451a to assess the degree of hemolysis in plasma samples from cord blood (n = 38), maternal blood (n = 38), and a hemolyzed reference sample. Average ΔCq for the plasma samples from cord and maternal blood was 2.78 ±0.17 and 2.50 ±0.19, respectively. The hemolyzed reference sample had a ΔCq of 12.13.

Overall, both hemolysis assessment assays suggest that the possibility of contamination by hemolysis is very low and, together with MP concentrations, the results indicate that the plasma samples used in this study are of high quality and suitable for analysis of circulating miRNAs. These are promising results for the MoBa-cohort and other cohorts worldwide, as these samples are collected in hospital settings combined with childbirth, and not in controlled laboratories. We suggest implementation of these plasma QC measures in other blood plasma based biobank studies investigating miRNA expression profiles and biomarker discovery to ensure plasma quality.

miRNA expression profiling

MiRNAs have been implicated in many diseases and they have been linked to pregnancy-related health outcomes and fetal programming. Their potential in biomarker identification when combined with the vast amount of information available for samples in large biobank cohort studies provides great opportunities, but these opportunities depend on reliable quantification of miRNA levels. Following an extensive plasma quality assurance, quantification and distribution analysis of circulating miRNAs in plasma from cord and maternal blood in the general population was performed.

The expression profiles of 201 human miRNAs were analyzed by qPCR. After raw data preprocessing and strict quality assurance filtering criteria, an expression matrix consisting of 61 miRNAs x 76 samples (38 cord and 38 maternal) remained and was used in the downstream analysis. Reproducibility is a major area of concern in miRNA research, and to increase strength for our data we removed all miRNAs with missing values, as the nature of this study is to investigate paired data. The quality of the resulting expression matrix is crucial in order to obtain reproducible and high quality data.

In order to compare the miRNA expression levels in cord blood plasma to that of their corresponding maternal sample, paired t-tests were carried out, followed by multiple testing correction using Benjamini-Hochberg with a 5% FDR threshold. Prior to multiple testing correction, the expression levels of 37 miRNAs (61%) were found to be significantly different (p<0.05) in plasma from cord compared to maternal blood samples, and following multiple testing correction this number was reduced to 32 miRNAs (52%). When an additional fold change cut-off (FC >± 1.5) was applied, 19 (31%) of the 32 miRNAs remained (Table 1). One interesting observation was that all these 19 miRNAs had higher transcript levels in cord samples compared to maternal samples

Table 1. miRNAs differentially expressed in cord and maternal blood plasma.

miRNA Mean ±SE Fold change p-value
Cord Maternal
hsa-miR-122-5p 3.54 ±0.60 2.29 ±0.60 1.54 0.0004
hsa-let-7d-3p 2.15 ±0.32 1.38 ±0.24 1.55 0.0005
hsa-miR-15b-5p 2.81 ±0.79 1.78 ±0.49 1.58 0.0144
hsa-miR-10b-5p 2.27 ±0.46 1.43 ±0.26 1.59 0.0089
hsa-miR-423-3p 3.15 ±0.59 1.76 ±0.40 1.79 0.0006
hsa-miR-423-5p 3.10 ±0.69 1.67 ±0.45 1.85 0.0007
hsa-miR-222-3p 2.95 ±0.71 1.50 ±0.35 1.96 0.0220
hsa-miR-335-5p 4.07 ±1.29 2.06 ±0.74 1.98 0.0013
hsa-miR-151a-5p 4.07 ±1.47 2.01 ±0.76 2.02 0.0037
hsa-miR-221-3p 3.80 ±1.04 1.75 ±0.46 2.17 0.0245
hsa-miR-373-5p 4.91 ±1.91 1.94 ±0.67 2.52 0.0007
hsa-miR-424-5p 4.85 ±2.21 1.92 ±0.37 2.52 0.0079
hsa-miR-652-3p 4.70 ±1.59 1.73 ±0.50 2.72 0.0017
hsa-miR-10a-5p 4.05 ±1.66 1.45 ±0.30 2.79 0.0240
hsa-miR-30e-5p 3.97 ±1.58 1.38 ±0.24 2.88 0.0080
hsa-miR-365a-3p 5.60 ±2.98 1.42 ±0.25 3.95 0.0118
hsa-miR-99a-5p 6.43 ±3.34 1.59 ±0.34 4.04 0.0200
hsa-miR-125a-5p 5.70 ±3.29 1.36 ±0.24 4.20 0.0209
hsa-miR-125b-5p 5.81 ±2.76 1.35 ±0.23 4.29 0.0072

Mean NRQ, standard error (SE) of the mean, fold change (NRQcord/NRQmaternal), and p-value. Paired t-tests followed by multiple testing correction using Benjamini-Hochberg with FDR = 5% and fold change >±1.5. Sorted by fold change.

Three samples, two from cord blood and one maternal sample, had consistently high transcript levels across several miRNAs, and may possibly be skewing the results. To confirm this, we generated bar plots and a Tukey box and whiskers plot of median NRQ values per sample, and all plots clearly identify the same three samples to have higher NRQ values when compared to the rest of the sample set (S1 Fig). Median NRQ for the three subjects was 11.45, 11.09, and 10.83, while the median across all subjects was only 1.19. The three identified samples could represent biological extremes, deviating from the general population.

We then performed linear regression analysis to investigate the correlation of expression levels in cord and maternal blood plasma. The observed correlation was low, and increased slightly after removal of the three samples with unusually high transcript levels (as identified above). Linear regression of the log2-transformed NRQ-values for cord against maternal plasma samples, before and after removal of the three high-expression samples, resulted in an R2 of 0.227 and 0.284, respectively (Fig 4). This lack of strong correlation in the miRNA expression profiles indicates low contamination of cord samples from mother’s blood during sample collection. This is an important observation in this study, as one of our future study goals is the utilization of cord blood plasma stored in biobanks to analyze miRNA profiles that may reflect epigenetic conditions in the newborn child. Similarly, low correlation was also observed when linear regression was performed for each miRNA (S2 Table) to find if any single miRNAs might have high correlation in their transcript levels between cord and maternal blood, with hsa-miR-142-3p demonstrating the highest correlation (R2 of 0.637). With low correlation between cord and maternal blood plasma samples, it would be interesting to build a predictive model to discriminate between cord and maternal samples, based on the nineteen-miRNA signature panel identified here. This should be attempted in a later study with a larger sample size, as our data set was too small for both training and validation of a robust predictive model.

Fig 4. Correlation of expression levels in plasma from cord and maternal blood.

Fig 4

Linear regression of log2-transformed NRQ-values for maternal plasma samples as a function of cord samples to assess correlation of expression levels (A) before and (B) after removal of potential outliers.

Another interesting observation regarding our studies on miRNAs and neurodevelopmental disorders is the miRNAs previously implicated in relation to ADHD. Through a literature search, we identified 30 miRNAs linked to ADHD (S3 Table), and among those 30, thirteen were present in our 61 miRNA expression profile data (Table 2). The presence of these miRNAs in cord blood plasma samples is promising for our future research where we will evaluate miRNA expression profiles in cord plasma as early biomarkers of ADHD, since most previous studies have been focused on whole blood or leukocytes, and on samples from children (6–17 years old) or adults [3739].

Table 2. MiRNAs implicated in ADHD and present in our data.

miRNA Mean ±SE In ADHD studies ADHD reference
Cord Maternal
hsa-let-7d-3p 2.15 ±0.32 1.38 ±0.24 Increased in serum, decreased in WB. [4042]
hsa-let-7d-5p 2.03 ±0.45 1.94 ±0.44 Increased in serum, decreased in WB. [4042]
hsa-let-7g-5p 3.23 ±1.24 2.87 ±1.32 Part of ADHD-prediction model in WBCs [43]
hsa-miR-101-3p 2.13 ±0.30 3.50 ±0.87 Part of ADHD-prediction model in WBCs, and increased in serum. [43, 44]
hsa-miR-107 2.27 ±0.39 1.87 ±0.44 Decreased in WB. [37]
hsa-miR-142-3p 2.13 ±0.37 4.66 ±1.79 Decreased in plasma when presence of psychiatric disease in the family of ADHD-subject. [45]
hsa-miR-151a-5p 4.07 ±1.47 2.01 ±0.76 Part of ADHD-prediction model in WBCs. [43]
hsa-miR-18a-5p 2.63 ±0.53 2.86 ±0.89 Decreased in WB. [37]
hsa-miR-191-5p 3.03 ±0.91 2.81 ±1.43 Increased in PBMCs. [38]
hsa-miR-22-3p 2.78 ±0.67 2.32 ±0.51 Decreased in WB. [37]
hsa-miR-24-3p 4.45 ±2.34 1.94 ±0.46 Decreased in WB. [37]
hsa-miR-26b-5p 2.95 ±0.78 1.67 ±0.41 Decreased in PBMCs. [38]
hsa-miR-30e-5p 3.97 ±1.58 1.38 ±0.24 Part of ADHD-prediction model in WBCs, and increased in WBCs. [39, 43]

Mean NRQ and standard error (SE) of the mean. WB: Whole blood; WBCs: White blood cells; PBMCs: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Concluding remarks

Overall, our findings suggest that good quality plasma samples suitable for miRNA profiling can be achieved from samples collected and stored by large biobanks, such as MoBa, and our extensive, although feasible, quality control measures established here can be incorporated in future projects. When working with large biobanks, the amount of biological material available is often limited, and obtaining high quality blood plasma samples is essential. Especially when studying circulating miRNAs in plasma, where the concentration of these molecules is very low. Employing a stepwise filtering approach removing non-informative miRNAs, we identified 19 miRNAs significantly differentially expressed in cord compared to maternal samples. By investigating cord and maternal samples simultaneously in future studies using a larger sample size, a predictive model to distinguish between cord and maternal samples could possibly be built, perhaps using these 19 miRNAs we identified. Furthermore, the low correlation of miRNA levels between cord and maternal samples holds promise for our future work where we will evaluate the potential of using miRNA expression profiles in cord blood plasma as early biomarkers of ADHD and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Identification of outlier subjects.

Median NRQ values per subject as bar plots for (A) cord and (B) maternal blood, and (C) all samples presented in a Tukey box and whiskers plot.

(TIF)

S1 Table. The 61 miRNAs of the final expression matrix.

Mean and standard error of the mean (SE) for raw Cq-values, Cq-values normalized with the custom spike-in, and NRQ. P-values from paired t-tests.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. R2 and p-values from linear regression analysis for each miRNA.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. MiRNAs whose expression levels have been implicated in ADHD in previous research.

WB: Whole blood; WBCs: White blood cells; PBMCs: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Ministry of Education and Research. We are grateful to all the participating families in Norway who take part in this on-going cohort study. We thank Maria Laura Amberger for her assistance in performing the spectrophotometric hemolysis assessment and the microparticle counts.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by The Research Council of Norway, NFR-FREE MEDBIO grant, POEMA - POTENTIAL EARLY DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR MARKERS OF ADHD: Analysis of miRNA profiles and DNA methylation status in triads (grant no.: 240763/F20). We would also like to thank the European Union Integrated Project NewGeneris, 6th Framework Programme, Priority 5: Food Quality and Safety; Newborns and Genotoxic exposure risks (FOOD-CT-2005-016320). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang K, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008;18(10):997–1006. 10.1038/cr.2008.282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(30):10513–8. 10.1073/pnas.0804549105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12):861–74. 10.1038/nrg3074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fiore R, Schratt G. Releasing a tiny molecular brake may improve memory. EMBO J. 2011;30(20):4116–8. 10.1038/emboj.2011.356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH. The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell. 2006;11(4):441–50. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(9):597–610. 10.1038/nrg2843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang Z, Huang D, Ni S, Peng Z, Sheng W, Du X. Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(1):118–26. 10.1002/ijc.25007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lu J, Xu Y, Quan Z, Chen Z, Sun Z, Qing H. Dysregulated microRNAs in neural system: Implication in pathogenesis and biomarker development in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2017;365:70–82. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang N, Zhou Z, Liao X, Zhang T. Role of microRNAs in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. IUBMB Life. 2009;61(6):566–71. 10.1002/iub.204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guil S, Esteller M. DNA methylomes, histone codes and miRNAs: tying it all together. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(1):87–95. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saito Y, Jones PA. Epigenetic activation of tumor suppressor microRNAs in human cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2006;5(19):2220–2. 10.4161/cc.5.19.3340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Magnus P, Birke C, Vejrup K, Haugan A, Alsaker E, Daltveit AK, et al. Cohort Profile Update: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(2):382–8. 10.1093/ije/dyw029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ibberson D, Benes V, Muckenthaler MU, Castoldi M. RNA degradation compromises the reliability of microRNA expression profiling. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:102 10.1186/1472-6750-9-102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fleige S, Pfaffl MW. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27(2–3):126–39. 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fleige S, Walf V, Huch S, Prgomet C, Sehm J, Pfaffl MW. Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28(19):1601–13. 10.1007/s10529-006-9127-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duale N, Lipkin WI, Briese T, Aarem J, Ronningen KS, Aas KK, et al. Long-term storage of blood RNA collected in RNA stabilizing Tempus tubes in a large biobank—evaluation of RNA quality and stability. BMC res notes. 2014;7:633 10.1186/1756-0500-7-633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aarem J, Brunborg G, Aas KK, Harbak K, Taipale MM, Magnus P, et al. Comparison of blood RNA isolation methods from samples stabilized in Tempus tubes and stored at a large human biobank. BMC res notes. 2016;9(1):430 10.1186/s13104-016-2224-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kirschner M, Edelman JJ, Kao S, Vallely M, Van Zandwijk N, Reid G. The Impact of Hemolysis on Cell-Free microRNA Biomarkers. Front Genet. 2013;4(94). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kirschner MB, Kao SC, Edelman JJ, Armstrong NJ, Vallely MP, van Zandwijk N, et al. Haemolysis during Sample Preparation Alters microRNA Content of Plasma. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24145 10.1371/journal.pone.0024145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paltiel L, Haugan A, Skjerden T, Harbak K, Bækken S, Stensrud NK, et al. The biobank of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study–present status. Nor Epidemiol. 2014;24:29–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ronningen KS, Paltiel L, Meltzer HM, Nordhagen R, Lie KK, Hovengen R, et al. The biobank of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study: a resource for the next 100 years. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(8):619–25. 10.1007/s10654-006-9041-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Merlo DF, Wild CP, Kogevinas M, Kyrtopoulos S, Kleinjans J. NewGeneris: a European study on maternal diet during pregnancy and child health. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(1):5–10. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gutzkow KB, Haug LS, Thomsen C, Sabaredzovic A, Becher G, Brunborg G. Placental transfer of perfluorinated compounds is selective—a Norwegian Mother and Child sub-cohort study. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2012;215(2):216–9. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blondal T, Jensby Nielsen S, Baker A, Andreasen D, Mouritzen P, Wrang Teilum M, et al. Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluids. Methods. 2013;59(1):S1–S6. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cheng HH, Yi HS, Kim Y, Kroh EM, Chien JW, Eaton KD, et al. Plasma processing conditions substantially influence circulating microRNA biomarker levels. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64795 10.1371/journal.pone.0064795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: URL http://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shet AS. Characterizing blood microparticles: technical aspects and challenges. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(4):769–74. 10.2147/vhrm.s955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chevillet JR, Kang Q, Ruf IK, Briggs HA, Vojtech LN, Hughes SM, et al. Quantitative and stoichiometric analysis of the microRNA content of exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(41):14888–93. 10.1073/pnas.1408301111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jia L, Zhou X, Huang X, Xu X, Jia Y, Wu Y, et al. Maternal and umbilical cord serum-derived exosomes enhance endothelial cell proliferation and migration. FASEB J. 2018;32(8):4534–43. 10.1096/fj.201701337RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.White JG. CHAPTER 3—Platelet Structure In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets (Second Edition). Burlington: Academic Press; 2007. p. 45–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Radu CM, Campello E, Spiezia L, Dhima S, Visentin S, Gavasso S, et al. Origin and levels of circulating microparticles in normal pregnancy: A longitudinal observation in healthy women. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015;75(6):487–95. 10.3109/00365513.2015.1052551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sacks GP, Studena K, Sargent IL, Redman CWG. Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):80–6. 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70254-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schweintzger S, Schlagenhauf A, Leschnik B, Rinner B, Bernhard H, Novak M, et al. Microparticles in newborn cord blood: Slight elevation after normal delivery. Thromb Res. 2011;128(1):62–7. 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kirschner MB, van Zandwijk N, Reid G. Cell-free microRNAs: potential biomarkers in need of standardized reporting. Front Genet. 2013;4:56 10.3389/fgene.2013.00056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kandemir H, Erdal ME, Selek S, Ay OI, Karababa IF, Kandemir SB, et al. Evaluation of several micro RNA (miRNA) levels in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2014;580:158–62. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.07.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanchez-Mora C, Soler Artigas M, Garcia-Martinez I, Pagerols M, Rovira P, Richarte V, et al. Epigenetic signature for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: identification of miR-26b-5p, miR-185-5p, and miR-191-5p as potential biomarkers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(5):890–7. 10.1038/s41386-018-0297-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang LJ, Li SC, Kuo HC, Chou WJ, Lee MJ, Chou MC, et al. Gray matter volume and microRNA levels in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aydin SU, Kabukcu Basay B, Cetin GO, Gungor Aydin A, Tepeli E. Altered microRNA 5692b and microRNA let-7d expression levels in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;115:158–64. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cao P, Wang L, Cheng Q, Sun X, Kang Q, Dai L, et al. Changes in serum miRNA-let-7 level in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder treated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or atomoxetine: An exploratory trial. Psychiatry Res. 2019;274:189–94. 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu LH, Peng M, Yu M, Zhao QL, Li C, Jin YT, et al. Circulating MicroRNA Let-7d in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Neuromolecular Med. 2015;17(2):137–46. 10.1007/s12017-015-8345-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang LJ, Li SC, Lee MJ, Chou MC, Chou WJ, Lee SY, et al. Blood-Bourne MicroRNA Biomarker Evaluation in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder of Han Chinese Individuals: An Exploratory Study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:227 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zadehbagheri F, Hosseini E, Bagheri-Hosseinabadi Z, Rekabdarkolaee HM, Sadeghi I. Profiling of miRNAs in serum of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder shows significant alterations. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;109:185–92. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karadag M, Gokcen C, Nacarkahya G, Namiduru D, Dandil F, Calisgan B, et al. Chronotypical characteristics and related miR-142-3p levels of children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2018;273:235–9. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Zhong-Cheng Luo

6 Feb 2020

PONE-D-19-35144

MiRNA profiles in blood plasma from mother-child duos in human biobanks and the implication of sample quality: Circulating miRNAs as potential early markers of child health

PLOS ONE

Dear Miss Dypås,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address the comments from the two reviewers carefully, and detail where/what changes have been made.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 22 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Zhong-Cheng Luo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dypas et. al. investigated the quality of a specific cohort of bio-banked plasma samples and the ability to reproducibly isolate miRNA from these samples for downstream quantitative analysis. Utilizing three independent techniques for determining plasma quality, they demonstrate that their plasma samples are of high quality (low MP, low hemolysis) and can be used for quantification of circulating miRNA levels. These experiments were properly controlled, and the manuscript is nicely written. My only major comment is the following:

Although the authors mention performing correlation analysis between each miRNA for the 38 pairs, these data are not included in manuscript. As the data in Figure 4 suggests that there may actually a large group of miRNAs with higher expression levels (>log2(0)) that correlate between cord and maternal samples, it would be important to include the R2 and p-values for each miRNA correlation as a supplement in the manuscript. P-value for the linear regression analysis in Figure 4 should also be included.

Minor comments

(1) In methods, the authors state that they collected 50 pairs of cord blood/maternal blood. However, there are only 38 pairs included in the miRNA analysis, with no explanation for the exclusion of other sample pairs. Please include a statement on why 12 pairs were excluded from miRNA analysis, as this could be an important technical caveat.

(2) No statement of patient consent prior to sample collection. This should be included.

(3) Figure 3: Individual points for each sample should be shown in the box plots.

(4) How might altered levels of exosomes affect miRNA analysis? Is there a difference in exosomes between cord blood and maternal blood?

Reviewer #2: The authors conducted thorough examination of the quality of the collected plasma samples by assessing microparticle counts and hemeolysis; and profiled many miRNAs to identified those expressed in cord and maternal blood plasma. The overall analysis procedure was strict and correct cautions were taken to ensure high quality of the obtained data. The quality of the manuscript is suitable to be published in PLOSOne.

One question:

Line 180 : NRQ = 2-ΔCq (where ΔCq = ΔCq (target) - Cq (global mean)).

Please confirm ΔCq (target) is used but not Cq (target); also “global mean” is not defined.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0231040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231040.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Mar 2020

Reviewer comments, author responses and manuscript changes

Reviewer #1

Comment 1: Although the authors mention performing correlation analysis between each miRNA for the 38 pairs, these data are not included in manuscript. As the data in Figure 4 suggests that there may actually a large group of miRNAs with higher expression levels (>log2(0)) that correlate between cord and maternal samples, it would be important to include the R2 and p-values for each miRNA correlation as a supplement in the manuscript. P-value for the linear regression analysis in Figure 4 should also be included.

Response: We agree that this is valuable information and Figure 4 has been revised to include the p-value for the linear regression analysis, and, a new table (S2 table) containing the R2 and p-values for each miRNA correlation has been included in supplementary information.

Comment 2: In methods, the authors state that they collected 50 pairs of cord blood/maternal blood. However, there are only 38 pairs included in the miRNA analysis, with no explanation for the exclusion of other sample pairs. Please include a statement on why 12 pairs were excluded from miRNA analysis, as this could be an important technical caveat.

Response: Thank you for pointing out that this important piece of information was missing. The manuscript has been revised to include a statement explaining that 12 pairs were excluded due to insufficient sample volume (line 111-112).

Comment 3: No statement of patient consent prior to sample collection. This should be included.

Response: A statement of patient consent prior to sample collection has been included in the methods section (line 117-118).

Comment 4: Figure 3: Individual points for each sample should be shown in the box plots.

Response: Figure 3 has been revised to include individual points for each sample as we agree that this enhances the readability of the plot and adds value.

Comment 5: How might altered levels of exosomes affect miRNA analysis? Is there a difference in exosomes between cord blood and maternal blood?

Response: The questions raised here is a very interesting topic, with no clear answers as of yet. The manuscript has been revised to include a paragraph on miRNAs in exosomes to clarify (line 224-229).

Early research hypothesized that extracellular miRNAs were protected by encapsulation in exosomes, and that the majority of miRNAs found in plasma or serum stemmed from these vesicles (1). Later it was discovered that 90-99% of extracellular miRNAs were actually associated with proteins in the argonaute family, not exosomes (2, 3). Moreover, it has also been shown that exosomes might actually contain very small amounts of miRNA, contrary to what was hypothesized before (4), and therefore might not affect analysis of total circulating miRNAs to such an extent as previously believed. Either way, when analyzing circulating miRNAs there is no precedence to remove exosomes from plasma, and miRNAs in exosomes are regarded as part of the circulating (i.e. extracellular) miRNAs, and altered levels of exosomes containing miRNAs then reflect changes in the individual’s physical state causing altered levels of circulating miRNAs. However, it is important to always include details of plasma preparation steps in your protocol so that readers know if exosomes are included in the plasma (or other sample material) for reproducibility and comparative purposes.

Regarding your question on a difference in exosomes between cord and maternal blood, not much is known. There is however one small study on this in serum, where they found slightly higher concentrations of exosomes in serum from maternal blood compared to cord blood (5).

Reviewer #2

Comment 1: Line 180 : NRQ = 2-ΔCq (where ΔCq = ΔCq (target) - Cq (global mean)). Please confirm ΔCq (target) is used but not Cq (target); also “global mean” is not defined.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. ΔCq(target) is a typo, and should be Cq(target) as you correctly assumed. The typo has been corrected and a definition of “global mean” has been added (line 183-184).

References

1. Hunter MP, Ismail N, Zhang X, Aguda BD, Lee EJ, Yu L, et al. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3694-e.

2. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, Ruf IK, Pritchard CC, Gibson DF, et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):5003-8.

3. Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Langheinz A, Burwinkel B. Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(16):7223-33.

4. Chevillet JR, Kang Q, Ruf IK, Briggs HA, Vojtech LN, Hughes SM, et al. Quantitative and stoichiometric analysis of the microRNA content of exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(41):14888-93.

5. Jia L, Zhou X, Huang X, Xu X, Jia Y, Wu Y, et al. Maternal and umbilical cord serum-derived exosomes enhance endothelial cell proliferation and migration. FASEB J. 2018;32(8):4534-43.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response_to_reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Zhong-Cheng Luo

16 Mar 2020

MiRNA profiles in blood plasma from mother-child duos in human biobanks and the implication of sample quality: Circulating miRNAs as potential early markers of child health

PONE-D-19-35144R1

Dear Dr. Dypås,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Zhong-Cheng Luo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Zhong-Cheng Luo

20 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-35144R1

MiRNA profiles in blood plasma from mother-child duos in human biobanks and the implication of sample quality: Circulating miRNAs as potential early markers of child health

Dear Dr. Dypås:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Zhong-Cheng Luo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Identification of outlier subjects.

    Median NRQ values per subject as bar plots for (A) cord and (B) maternal blood, and (C) all samples presented in a Tukey box and whiskers plot.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. The 61 miRNAs of the final expression matrix.

    Mean and standard error of the mean (SE) for raw Cq-values, Cq-values normalized with the custom spike-in, and NRQ. P-values from paired t-tests.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. R2 and p-values from linear regression analysis for each miRNA.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. MiRNAs whose expression levels have been implicated in ADHD in previous research.

    WB: Whole blood; WBCs: White blood cells; PBMCs: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response_to_reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES