Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Mar 23;16(3):e1008685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008685

pH-dependent activation of cytokinesis modulates Escherichia coli cell size

Elizabeth A Mueller 1, Corey S Westfall 1, Petra Anne Levin 1,*
Editor: Kristina Jonas2
PMCID: PMC7117782  PMID: 32203516

Abstract

Cell size is a complex trait, derived from both genetic and environmental factors. Environmental determinants of bacterial cell size identified to date primarily target assembly of cytosolic components of the cell division machinery. Whether certain environmental cues also impact cell size through changes in the assembly or activity of extracytoplasmic division proteins remains an open question. Here, we identify extracellular pH as a modulator of cell division and a significant determinant of cell size across evolutionarily distant bacterial species. In the Gram-negative model organism Escherichia coli, our data indicate environmental pH impacts the length at which cells divide by altering the ability of the terminal cell division protein FtsN to localize to the cytokinetic ring where it activates division. Acidic environments lead to enrichment of FtsN at the septum and activation of division at a reduced cell length. Alkaline pH inhibits FtsN localization and suppresses division activation. Altogether, our work reveals a previously unappreciated role for pH in bacterial cell size control.

Author summary

Bacteria are constantly under assault from endogenous and environmental stressors. To ensure viability and reproductive fitness, many bacteria alter their growth and replication in response to stressful conditions. Previous work from many groups has identified regulatory mechanisms linking cell division with nutrient availability and metabolic state. However, comparatively little is known about how the cell division machinery responds to physical and chemical cues in the environment. Here, we identify a fundamental property of the extracellular environment—environmental pH—as a significant contributor to bacterial cell size. Our genetic and cytological data indicate pH-dependent changes in E. coli cell size are in part due to differential localization of the cell division activator FtsN across pH environments. Increased abundance of FtsN at midcell in acidic environments promotes cell division at a reduced cell volume, while decreased abundance of FtsN at midcell in alkaline environments effectively delays cell division until a larger size is reached. Altogether, our work identifies pH as an environmental determinant of E. coli cell division and illuminates FtsN recruitment as a mediator of cell size.

Introduction

Size is a fundamental property of cells and is tightly linked to physiological state. With few exceptions, two processes dictate cell size: cell growth and cell cycle progression. During steady state or “balanced” growth, bacteria add on average the same volume between cell birth and division regardless of their size at birth. This phenomenon, referred to as the ‘adder’ model for bacterial cell size homeostasis, results in convergence to an average cell size [1,2]. Simulations and experimental data suggest that adder is an emergent property of two processes: 1) growth rate-dependent synthesis of rate-limiting components of the cell division machinery and 2) accumulation of these proteins to threshold numbers necessary to support cytokinesis. Consistent with this model, perturbing accumulation of one such protein, the tubulin homolog FtsZ, disrupts the volume added between divisions. Altering the onset of DNA replication fails to disrupt homeostatic cell size. Therefore, cell division—and not cell cycle progression generally—ultimately controls the volume of new material cells add during steady state growth [3].

Although there is little variation in size during steady state growth under a single, constant condition, changes in the environment can drastically affect the average cell size of single celled organisms. Nutrient availability, in particular, has a dramatic and positive impact on the size of evolutionarily distant bacteria—including Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Bacillus subtilis—as well as on budding and fission yeast [46]. Bacteria undergo a three-fold increase in cell volume when cultured in nutrient-rich conditions as compared to nutrient-poor conditions. Cell length and cell width both scale with nutrient availability in E. coli [7], while width remains nearly constant for B. subtilis [8]. The molecular basis of the positive relationship between nutrients and cell size is multifactorial, involving changes in biosynthetic processes that underlie cell growth [9,10] and the pathways mediating cell cycle progression [4,5,11,12]. Notably, nutrient-dependent changes in cell cycle progression identified to date all impinge on FtsZ assembly. In B. subtilis and E. coli, accumulation of the metabolite uridine disphosphate (UDP)-glucose during growth in carbon-rich media activates two unrelated glucosyltransferases, UgtP and OpgH, which antagonize FtsZ ring assembly. Although mechanistically distinct, both antagonists functionally increase the threshold quantity of FtsZ that must accumulate prior to cytokinesis [4,5].

While regulatory mechanisms coordinating division, nutrient availability, and size are well documented, comparatively little is known about how the cell division apparatus responds to other environmental cues. The division machinery in E. coli consists of over 20 proteins, collectively referred to as the divisome. These proteins assemble in a hierarchical fashion, beginning with midcell polymerization of FtsZ in the cytosol and ending with recruitment of septal cell wall synthesis enzymes and their regulators in the periplasm [13,14]. Similar to true extracellular processes, the periplasm is sensitive to changes in the abundance of ions and other small molecules due to the semi-permeable outer membrane and assumes the environmental pH while the cytosol remains relatively buffered at steady state [1517]. Thus, the division proteins with domains in the periplasm are directly exposed to dynamic and potentially extreme environmental conditions—including changes in pH, osmolarity, and ionic strength—that may impact their ability to activate and complete cross wall synthesis. Differential activation of periplasmic components of the cell division machinery is sufficient to alter cell size at steady state: in E. coli and Caulobacter crescentus, gain-of-function mutations that affect the initiation or rate of septal cell wall synthesis consistently reduce size independent of changes to growth rate [1822]. However, whether extracytoplasmic division proteins represent native integration points for environmental modulation of cell size remains unclear.

Here, we identify environmental pH as a conserved, growth rate-independent determinant of cell size in evolutionarily distant bacterial species. Distinct from nutrient-dependent changes in size, which stem from changes in FtsZ assembly, pH predominately affects periplasmic components of the division machinery. Specifically, pH-dependent changes in E. coli cell length appear to stem from differential localization of the terminal division protein and cell wall synthesis activator, FtsN. Collectively, our data support a model in which pH-dependent changes in accumulation of FtsN at the cytokinetic ring impact the volume at which cells initiate division, thereby altering average cell size.

Results

pH influences cell size in diverse bacteria

To investigate the impact of pH on cell size, we cultured E. coli strain MG1655 at steady state in nutrient-rich media (LB + 0.2% glucose) under a physiologically relevant range of pH conditions (pH 4.5–8.5) [23,24]. We sampled cultures and fixed the cells during early exponential phase (OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2) for cell size analysis. At this time point, the pH of the culture had not significantly deviated from the starting pH (S1 Fig). Strikingly, cells cultured at pH 4.5 were ~75% of the area of their counterparts grown at pH 7.0. In contrast, cells cultured at pH 8.5 were ~120% of the area of cells grown at pH 7.0 (Fig 1A and 1B; S2 Fig and S2 Table). For comparison, loss of the metabolic cell size regulators opgH and pgm only leads to a 12 and 25% difference in cell area, respectively [5]. Apart from the most extreme acidic conditions, nearly all of the pH-dependent changes in size were restricted to changes in cell length and were independent of changes in growth rate, media composition, or buffering capacity (Fig 1C and 1D; S1 Fig, S2 Table). To independently validate that pH alters cell size homeostasis in live cells, we used time lapse imaging to measure the cell length added between divisions, a property of the adder model of cell size homeostasis [1,2]. Consistent with our findings in fixed cells, cells cultured in acidic medium added a shorter length from birth to division than cells grown at neutral and alkaline pH (Fig 1E).

Fig 1. Environmental pH influences E. coli cell size.

Fig 1

A) Representative micrographs of MG1655 grown to steady state in LB media + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected at OD600 ~0.1–0.2 for imaging. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. B-D) Mean cell area (B), cell length (C), and cell width (D) for MG1655 grown in LB media + 0.2% glucose from pH 4.5–8.5. Individual points denote mean population measurement for each biological replicate. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Significance shown in S2 Table. E) Change in length from beginning to end of the cell cycle for individual cells grown in LB media + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5 (n = 450), pH 7.0 (n = 489), or pH 8.0 (n = 461) from two independent experiments. Dotted line represents median length added, and straight lines indicate quartiles. Significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test, corrected for multiple comparisons with Dunn’s test.

pH-dependent changes in size were not unique to MG1655 or even to E. coli. We observed similar effects of pH on cell area in E. coli strain W3110, another commonly used K-12 laboratory isolate, and in the evolutionarily distant Gram-positive coccus Staphylococcus aureus (S3 Fig). The average volume of S. aureus cells was reduced by ~48% during growth in acidic (pH 5.5) medium compared to alkaline (pH 8.0) medium (average volume of 1.02 ± 0.03 compared to 2.10 ± 0.17 μm3). Likewise, during this work two separate studies noted the size of Streptococcus pneumoniae and C. crescentus also increases during growth in alkaline medium [25,26]. Altogether, these findings establish environmental pH as a mediator of size across evolutionarily distant bacterial species.

Acidic pH suppresses conditional mutants of late divisome proteins and bypasses the essentiality of FtsK

Our observation that pH-dependent changes in E. coli cell size were restricted to changes in cell length and were independent of changes in mass doubling time (Fig 1C; S2 Table) indicated divisome assembly and/or activity may be pH sensitive. In E. coli assembly of the ‘core’ cell division machinery is a sequential process [13]. First, the so-called “early” division proteins—including the cytosolic tubulin homolog FtsZ, membrane anchor ZipA, and membrane-associated actin homolog FtsA—form a dynamic, discontinuous ring-like structure at midcell [2729]. Subsequently, a series of “late” division proteins containing transmembrane and periplasmic domains becomes enriched at the septal ring; these include the DNA translocase FtsK [30,31], the regulatory FtsQLB complex [20,21,32], and the septal cell wall synthesis transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase pair, FtsI (also known as PBP3) and FtsW [33]. In the final phase of division in E. coli, FtsN accumulates at midcell and is believed to “trigger” septal cell wall synthesis and constriction through interactions with the early and late divisome components [20,21,3436]. In addition to the essential division proteins described above, there are nearly a dozen non-essential or conditionally essential factors involved in divisome stabilization (e.g., ZapBCD and FtsP) [3740], cell wall synthesis (e.g., PBP1a and PBP1b) [41,42], cell wall hydrolysis (e.g., AmiA, AmiB, and AmiC) [43], and regulation of cell wall remodeling (e.g., FtsEX) [44,45]. The sheer number of proteins involved in division imply many possible integration points through which pH may modulate division to tune cell size. Based on our previous finding that pH impacts the activity of periplasmic cell wall enzymes [46], we speculated that division proteins with periplasmic domains would be the most likely regulatory targets of pH.

To identify the specific stage(s) of cell division influenced by pH, we took advantage of a set of heat-sensitive alleles of essential cell division genes. These conditional mutants played a historically important role in parsing the key functions of the essential components of divisome and associated modulatory proteins [47,48]. Suppression of the heat-sensitive phenotype of these conditional mutants under growth-restrictive conditions (LB- no salt, 37 or 42°C) suggests a positive influence on the division machinery while enhancement of heat sensitivity under typically growth-permissive conditions (LB, 30°C) indicates a negative influence on the division machinery. We assessed the impact of pH on the growth of a subset of heat-sensitive mutants, including alleles of both early cytoplasmic division genes [ftsZ84 (G105S) and ftsA27 (S195P)] and late periplasmic division genes [ftsK44 (G80A), ftsQ1 (E125K), and ftsI23 (Y380D)].

Although growth of the early cytoplasmic division mutants was insensitive to pH, low pH (5.5) suppressed the heat sensitivity of the late periplasmic division mutants, and conversely, high pH (8.0) enhanced it (Fig 2A and 2B). Importantly, this effect was not allele specific. Additional heat-sensitive variants of FtsZ (ftsZ25), FtsA (ftsA12), and FtsI (ftsI2158) behaved similarly to their previously tested cognates, although ftsA12 heat sensitivity was modestly enhanced at pH 8.0 (S5 Fig). When we expanded the tested pH range from pH 4.5–9.0, the heat sensitivity of the strains encoding ftsK44, ftsQ1, and ftsI23 was consistently suppressed between pH 5.0 and pH 6.5 and enhanced between pH 7.5 and pH 9.0 (S5 Fig). Notably, these pH ranges correspond to conditions in which the wild type cells have decreased and increased average cell lengths, respectively (Fig 1C). We did not observe changes in heat sensitivity in strains encoding ftsZ84 or ftsA27 in the expanded pH range (S5 Fig). We also ruled out the contribution of the accessory periplasmic divisome proteins FtsP, PBP1a, and PBP1b, which had been previously shown to be stress or pH responsive [40,46]; cells defective in each of the aforementioned proteins still exhibited pH-dependent changes in cell size (S4 Fig).

Fig 2. Acidic pH stabilizes late division proteins and bypasses the essentiality of FtsK.

Fig 2

A-B) Representative plating efficiency for strains producing heat-sensitive variants of early division proteins (PAL2452, ftsZ84; WM4107, ftsA27) and late division proteins (WM2101, ftsK44; EC3433, ftsQ1; WM4649, ftsI23) when grown under non-permissive conditions (A) or permissive conditions (B) as a function of agar plate pH. Image is representative of three biological replicates. C) Comparison of growth of MG1655 ΔftsK::kan strain (EAM1311) cultured on LB agarose plate at neutral (left) or acidic pH (right) at 30 °C. D) Comparison of cell morphology of MG1655 ΔftsK::kan strain (EAM1311) grown for 2 hours in LB liquid media at neutral (top) or acidic pH (bottom). Arrowheads indicate lysed cells. Scale bar denotes 20 μm.

The complete suppression of heat sensitivity in ftsK44 and ftsI23 mutants at very high temperature (42°C) suggested these genes may be dispensable for divisome activity in acidic media. To test this, we attempted to transduce deletion alleles of each gene into wild type cells under acidic (pH 5.5) and neutral conditions at 30°C. Although we were unable to delete the native ftsI even when we produced a catalytically inactive variant of FtsI (S307A) from a plasmid [49], we were able generate stable transductants with the ftsK::kan allele when the cells were grown in acidic media (Fig 2C). FtsK null mutants were slightly elongated when cultured in acidic media but rapidly filamented and lysed when transferred to neutral pH (Fig 2D). In total, these findings are consistent with acidic pH stabilizing one or more late division proteins, and this is sufficient to bypass the essential activity of FtsK.

Septal recruitment of the terminal division protein FtsN is pH sensitive

To directly visualize the effect of pH on the assembly of the division machinery and narrow down which phase(s) of division may be pH responsive, we imaged midcell recruitment of a subset of GFP-tagged division proteins. We selected fusion proteins that spanned the divisome assembly hierarchy, including early cytoplasmic proteins FtsZ and FtsA, late periplasmic proteins FtsL and FtsI, and the terminal periplasmic division protein FtsN (Fig 3A). All constructs were integrated at the lambda locus in otherwise wild type MG1655 cells with the gene of interest expressed from an IPTG-inducible promoter. Production of these fusion proteins leads to a characteristic midcell ring of fluorescence for a fraction of the cell cycle proportional to their lifetime at the septum [50]. Because populations of E. coli cells are unsynchronized and thus all cell cycle stages are represented at a single time point, comparison of septal ring frequency (i.e., the percentage of cells that exhibit midcell localization of the protein of interest) across conditions can be used as a proxy for changes in assembly dynamics and/or enrichment of division proteins at midcell [50]. IPTG levels were titrated such that fusion protein production did not disrupt pH-dependent changes in size (S6 Fig).

Fig 3. Septal recruitment of the terminal division protein FtsN is pH sensitive.

Fig 3

A) Schematic depicting recruitment hierarchy of the early division proteins (green), late division proteins (purple), and final division protein FtsN (blue) to midcell. B) Representative micrographs of MG1655 derivatives producing the indicated GFP-tagged division proteins (BH330, FtsZ-GFP; EAM410, GFP-FtsA; PAL3700, GFP-FtsL; EAM412, GFP-FtsI; EAM621, GFP-FtsN). Cells were cultured to steady state in LB media at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. C-D) Mean percentage of cells that score positive for a GFP septal ring of the indicated early (C) and late (D) GFP-tagged division proteins in LB media at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Individual points depict population mean of individual biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons with Sidak’s test. E) Comparison of mean GFP-FtsN septal ring frequency (EAM621) and mean cell length (MG1655) from pH 4.5–8.5. Cell length data is from Fig 1C. Shaded region denotes the error of the measurement (SD for ring frequency; SEM for cell length). F) Representative immunoblot for FtsN and FtsZ levels in MG1655 ΔmalE::kan (CW142) cultured to steady state in LB media at pH 5.0, 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Quantification shown in SI Appendix, S9 Fig.

When we compared the septal ring frequency of the fusion proteins at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0, cells producing GFP-FtsN exhibited a striking pH-dependent difference in midcell localization of the protein (Fig 3B–3D; S3 Table). GFP-FtsN was significantly enriched at midcell in acidic media (~30% septal localization frequency) and reduced in alkaline media (~15% septal localization frequency). This trend held across an expanded pH range (4.5–8.5) and was inversely proportional to changes in cell length (Fig 3E). To validate the septal ring frequency analysis, we quantified midcell GFP-FtsN intensity across pH conditions using the ImageJ plugin Coli Inspector [50]. This analysis confirmed midcell enrichment of FtsN at a reduced cell size in acidic media (S7 Fig). This analysis also revealed a modest increase in GFP-FtsI intensity (S7 Fig); however, subsequent assessment of GFP-FtsI’s septal localization frequency across a wider pH range did not uncover a consistent correlation between pH and ring frequency, as we observed for GFP-FtsN (Fig 3D; SI Appendix, S8 Fig). Consequently, we elected to focus on FtsN’s contribution to pH-dependent changes in size in the present investigation.

Two models explain pH-dependent changes in midcell localization of FtsN: 1) increased expression, production, or stability of FtsN in acidic conditions and/or 2) changes in FtsN’s affinity for the cytokinetic machinery. To address the former possibilities, we compared bulk levels of FtsN from cells grown in different pH environments. Neither the levels of the native or GFP-FtsN fusion protein varied as a function of pH by immunoblot (Fig 3F; SI Appendix, S9 and S10 Figs). We did observe the appearance of an FtsN degradation or processed product, but its abundance was not predictably correlated with pH (SI Appendix, S9 Fig). Altogether, these data indicate observed changes in ring frequency are likely due to an increase in affinity for the septal ring under acidic conditions.

Enrichment of septal FtsN in acidic media does not require its glycan binding domain

We next sought to determine the regions of FtsN required for pH-dependent recruitment to midcell. FtsN is a bitopic inner membrane protein with no known enzymatic activity. It possesses three regions with characterized roles in cell division: 1) a short, N-terminal cytoplasmic patch that directly interacts with the early division protein FtsA [51,52]; 2) an alpha helical region in the periplasm referred to as the constriction control domain (CCD, amino acids 75–93) that is believed to activate the septal cell wall synthesis machinery [20,35,52]; and 3) a periplasmic C-terminal SPOR domain that binds denuded cell wall glycans produced upon constriction initiation [35,53] (Fig 4A). While the SPOR domain is the primary septal localization determinant of FtsN, the FtsA interaction interface and CCD are believed to a play a role in the initial recruitment of FtsN to the septum, at least prior to the onset of constriction [5254]. The CCD is the only region of FtsN strictly essential for viability [20,35].

Fig 4. pH-dependent recruitment of FtsN to midcell does not require the SPOR domain.

Fig 4

A) Schematic depicting the major features of FtsN, including an FtsA interaction interface (green), essential constriction control domain (CCD, purple), and peptidoglycan-binding SPOR domain (orange). B) Mean percentage cells that score positive for a GFP-FtsN septal ring when producing either full length GFP-FtsN (pCH201), GFP-FtsN(1–243) (pCH354), GFP-FtsN(1–105) (pMG12), GFP-FtsN(1–81) (pMG13), or GFP-FtsN(1–105) RRKK>DDEE (pMG12-RRKK>DDEE) from a plasmid in the wild type background (MG1655) Cells were grown to steady state in LB media with 25 μM IPTG and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Individual points depict population mean of individual biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation.

To clarify which, if any, of these interactions are required for pH-sensitize recruitment of FtsN to midcell, we compared the septal localization frequency of truncations containing both the FtsA interaction interface and CCD (1–243 and 1–105) or only the FtsA interaction interface (1–81) fused to GFP at the N-terminus and expressed from a plasmid at low induction levels. We could not visualize the SPOR domain alone, as periplasmic GFP fusions exhibit pH-dependent changes in brightness even after fixation [55]. If any of these regions affects FtsN septal recruitment across pH environments, we expect to observe an increase in septal localization in acidic conditions, similar to what we previously observed for the full length GFP-FtsN (Figs 3 and 4B).

Surprisingly, although loss of the SPOR domain decreased the overall percentage of cells scoring positive for a GFP-FtsN ring, it was not required for pH-dependent differences in septal localization frequency. Truncations containing just the FtsA interaction domain and the CCD—GFP-FtsN(1–243) and GFP-FtsN(1–105)—remained pH sensitive (Fig 4B). In contrast, cells producing GFP-FtsN(1–81) rarely were scored positive for a septal ring under any pH condition, similar to what had been previously observed [35]. To interrogate the contribution of the FtsA interface, we compared the septal ring frequency of a GFP-FtsN(1–105) variant in which a patch of conserved basic residues in the N-terminus was mutated to acidic amino acids (residues 16–19, RRKK>DDEE). This charge swap has been shown to impair the FtsN-FtsA interaction both in vitro [56] and in vivo [52]. Consistent with a role for FtsA interaction in septal recruitment, this variant failed to localize to midcell under any pH condition (Fig 4B). Overall, our data indicate that the CCD and FtsA interaction interface—but not the SPOR domain—are required for differential recruitment of FtsN to the septum across pH environments.

Overexpression of ftsN decreases cell length in rich media

If FtsN localization to the otherwise mature divisome is sufficient to trigger constriction, increasing FtsN’s likelihood of interaction with other components of the division machinery via overexpression should lead to reductions in cell length. To test this model, we overexpressed gfp-ftsN from a plasmid in the wild type background at neutral pH. Consistent with FtsN serving as a division “trigger” and with previous work in C. crescentus [19], we observed an induction-dependent decrease in cell length of up to ~15%, which correlated with an increase in septal localization frequency (Fig 5A, 5B and 5D; S3 Table). Cell width did not decrease upon ftsN overexpression and in fact, modestly increased (Fig 5C), possibly reflecting a competition between the cell division and cell elongation machineries for a shared pool of precursors [28]. These results conflict with some studies reporting toxicity and a modest increase in cell length with ftsN overexpression [13,48,57]. To confirm our findings, we repeated this experiment using a separate untagged expression construct and again observed a similar reduction in cell length (S12 Fig). Differences in growth conditions likely explain at least part of the discrepancy between ftsN overexpression phenotypes [13,19,48,57]. While overproduction of FtsN in rich medium reduces size and does not impact mass doubling time (Fig 5; S12 Fig and S4 Table), we find overproduction of FtsN in minimal medium (AB + 0.2% glycerol) results in a severe growth defect (S12 Fig).

Fig 5. Overexpression of ftsN reduces cell length.

Fig 5

A) Representative micrographs of MG1655 overexpressing gfp-ftsN (MG1655/pCH201) grown to steady state with varying levels of inducer (IPTG) and collected for imaging at OD600 ~0.1–0.2. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. B-D) Mean cell length (B), cell width (C), and GFP-FtsN septal ring frequency (D) of cells overexpressing gfp-ftsN grown to steady state LB media (MG1655/pCH201) with varying levels of inducer (IPTG). Individual points depict population mean from each biological replicate. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (B, C) or standard deviation (D). Significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA, normalized for multiple comparisons with Dunnett’s test. E) Mean cell length of MG1655 overexpressing the indicated gfp-ftsN truncations and point mutants from a plasmid during growth in LB media. All strains harboring a construct were induced with 1 mM IPTG. Individual points depict population mean from each biological replicate. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA, normalized for multiple comparisons with Dunnett’s test.

To identify the regions of FtsN that are sufficient to reduce length in rich media, we overexpressed a series of ftsN truncation mutants in wild type cells at neutral pH and measured their size [35]. Our data demonstrate the N-terminal 105 amino acids of FtsN, which include both the FtsA interaction interface and the CCD, are sufficient for overexpression-dependent reductions in cell length (Fig 5E). Overexpression of ftsN encoding only part of the CCD (1–81, 1–90), the CCD alone (71–105 targeted to the periplasm with a TorA signal peptide), or the SPOR domain alone (243–319 targeted to the periplasm with a TorA signal peptide) did not significantly reduce length despite being produced at similar levels (S13 Fig). Somewhat surprisingly, the SPOR domain was not required for reductions in length, suggesting a direct interaction with the peptidoglycan is not necessary for FtsN’s role in size control [53]. Overexpression of ftsN(1–105) mutants impaired for FtsA interaction (D5N, RRKK>DDEE) [51,52,56] or essential CCD activity (Y83A, W85A) [20] failed to reduce length despite being stably produced (Fig 5E and 5F; S13 Fig). Collectively, this functional analysis establishes the FtsA interaction interface and the CCD as requirements for FtsN-mediated reductions in cell length.

The size of cells expressing gain-of-function mutants ftsA* and ftsL* is insensitive to pH

Gain-of-function alleles of ftsA, ftsL, ftsB and ftsW have been identified that mimic the stimulatory effect of FtsN on the divisome and consequently bypass FtsN’s essential function in E. coli. Cells expressing these mutants are constitutively short, independent of changes in growth rate [18,20,21,45,58]. We reasoned that if environmental pH modulates division through a related mechanism, the size of cells expressing hypermorphic alleles would be insensitive to pH (Fig 6A). To test this model, we compared size and FtsN localization in two of most well-studied division hypermorphs, ftsA* (R286W) and ftsL* (E88K), at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. The size of ftsA* and ftsL* mutants was invariant across pH conditions (Fig 6B). At the same time, the frequency of septal GFP-FtsN was higher in the hypermorphic strains (41% and 38%, respectively, compared to 21% of wild type cells) independent of differences in GFP-FtsN protein levels (Fig 6C; S12 Fig). GFP-FtsN septal localization remained high across all tested pH conditions (S3 Table).

Fig 6. ftsA* and ftsL* gain-of-function mutants are insensitive to pH.

Fig 6

A) Genetic model for pH-dependent reductions in cell length. B) Mean cell length of ftsA* (BH142) and ftsL* (MT13) grown to steady state LB media + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2 for imaging. MG1655 data from Fig 1C is shown for comparison. Individual points denote population mean for each biological replicate. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons with Sidak’s test. C) Mean GFP-FtsN septal ring frequency for ftsA* (EAM747) and ftsL* (EAM749) cultured to steady state in LB media at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2 for imaging. EAM621 (MG1655 GFP-FtsN) data Fig 3D is shown for comparison. D) Representative plating efficiency for ftsN depletion in WT (HSC074/pBAD33-ftsN), ftsA* (EAM719/pBAD33-ftsN), and ftsL* (EAM723/pBAD33-ftsN) cells at pH 5.5 (middle), 7.0 (left), and 8.0 (right). Image is representative of three biological replicates.

These data are consistent with two models for pH-mediated division activation: 1) growth in acidic media recruits FtsN to the septum more efficiently, causing activation of the divisome at a reduced cell size, or 2) pH influences the divisome activation state independent of FtsN. In the latter model, enhanced FtsN recruitment under acidic conditions may be a consequence, rather than the cause, of pH-dependent activation of one or more upstream division proteins, possibly due to the proposed self-reinforcing nature of the divisome [59]. To differentiate between these models, we attempted to deplete FtsN in wild type cells in acidic media. If acidic pH activates the divisome independent of FtsN, we anticipated that less FtsN would be required to sustain growth in acidic media, as is seen for the hypermorph mutants. Consistent with previous work [20,36,60], ftsA* and ftsL* mutants tolerated significant depletion of FtsN irrespective of pH environment. However, we were unable to deplete FtsN in wild type cells in any pH condition tested (Fig D; S14 Fig). This result indicates FtsN is required for low pH-mediated division activation, favoring model in which acidic pH activates division either through FtsN alone or FtsN together with upstream divisome proteins (Fig 6A).

Discussion

While metabolic control of cell size has been a topic of investigation for nearly sixty years [61], comparatively little is known about the impact of the physical and chemical environment on cell size. Here, we make the surprisingly observation that E. coli cell division and cell size are remarkably sensitive to environmental pH, a property that varies widely across the niches this organism inhabits in the wild [23,24]. Specifically, we find that growth in acidic media stimulates cytokinesis in E. coli at a smaller volume than that of cells grown in neutral media; conversely, alkaline conditions increase the size at division (Fig 1). The differences in average length between cells cultured at pH 4.5 and pH 8.5 exceeds 40%, over three times the contribution of metabolic regulator OpgH to cell size [5]. Significantly, pH impacts cell length independent of changes in mass doubling time (S2 Table), contributing to a growing body of evidence suggesting size is not necessarily coupled to growth rate [12,62,63].

FtsN as an integration point for pH-dependent changes in cell size

Our data indicate acid-dependent division activation is governed at least in part by increases in the affinity of the E. coli terminal division protein and so-called division “trigger,” FtsN, for other periplasmic components of the cytokinetic ring. An alkaline environment likely has the opposite effect—reducing affinity between divisome components and inhibiting FtsN recruitment (Fig 7). Several independent lines of inquiry support this conclusion. First, we find that FtsN septal accumulation is inversely proportional to pH-dependent changes in cell length. During growth in acidic conditions, cells are short, and septal FtsN is abundant. Conversely, during growth in alkaline media, cells are long, and septal FtsN is depleted (Fig 3). Secondly, consistent with changes in midcell FtsN accumulation driving pH-dependent differences in cell length, overexpression of FtsN is sufficient to promote cytokinesis at a reduced cell volume, at least during growth in rich media (Fig 5; S12 Fig). Importantly, overexpression of other late division proteins has not been associated with reductions in cell size. Simultaneous overexpression of the ftsQ, ftsL, and ftsB causes cell filamentation [64], and overexpression of ftsI also modestly increases cell length (S12 Fig). Finally, in further support of a direct role for FtsN in low pH-mediated division activation, FtsN cannot be depleted in acidic media (Fig 6D), which would be expected if division activation occurred in an FtsN-independent manner [20,36,60].

Fig 7. Simplified model of known environmental regulators of cell division and cell size in Escherichia coli.

Fig 7

1) Growth in carbon-rich media leads to intracellular accumulation of the metabolite uridine disphosphate (UDP)-glucose. UDP-glucose activates moonlighting glucosyltransferase OpgH, which antagonizes FtsZ assembly and leads to an increase in cell length. 2) Environmental pH alters in the affinity for FtsN for the midcell. Growth in acidic medium enhances recruitment of FtsN to midcell, reducing cell length. Conversely, growth in alkaline medium inhibits FtsN accumulation at the midcell, increasing cell length.

Several additional, less direct pieces of evidence also implicate FtsN’s involvement in pH-dependent divisome activation. Overexpression of FtsN suppresses the heat sensitivity of cells encoding variants of FtsA, FtsK, FtsQ, and FtsI and bypasses the essentiality of FtsK (S11 Fig) [48,65,66], similar to the phenotypes we observe when culturing the mutants in acidic media (Fig 2). We also observed an increase in cell chaining in alkaline pH, particularly during growth in MOPS minimal media (S1 Fig). This latter observation is consistent with FtsN’s role in recruiting the septal amidases, which are required for efficient daughter cell separation following constriction [43,67].

FtsN is an attractive integration point for cell size control. As the final essential division protein enriched at the septum [34,68], FtsN has long been believed to “trigger” cytokinesis, and its presence at the septum is correlated with visible constriction [35,69,70]. Intriguingly, FtsN interacts with and regulates both early cytoplasmic and late periplasmic divisome proteins [20,21,71,72], potentially allowing it coordinate the activities of disparate components of the cell division apparatus. Indeed, recent work suggests FtsN may promote cytokinesis through two mechanisms: 1) stabilizing FtsZ filaments through its FtsA interaction interface [56], and 2) activating the septal cell wall synthesis enzymes FtsI and FtsW in the periplasm through its essential constriction control domain (CCD) [20,73]. Our data reinforce contribution of both the FtsA interaction interface and the CCD in FtsN’s ability to promote cytokinesis. FtsN mutants defective for either domain fail to localize to the cytokinetic ring or to reduce size when overexpressed (Figs 4 and 5). Apart from promoting cytokinesis, FtsN also activates PBP1b [64,74,75], a nonessential cell wall synthesis enzyme speculated to play a role in cell wall repair during normal growth of the E. coli peptidoglycan sacculus [46,7678]. Midcell enrichment of FtsN in acidic media may also augment PBP1b activity at the septum and thus direct it to the region with the highest rates of peptidoglycan synthesis. In support of this model, PBP1b defective cells form septal bulges and lyse upon exposure to extremely acidic (pH < 4.8) conditions [46].

Our data suggest a model for pH-mediated division activation in E. coli. Acidic growth conditions enhance recruitment of FtsN to the septum through an as of yet unknown mechanism. On the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane, the FtsN-FtsA interaction stabilizes treadmilling FtsZ filaments, possibly by modulating FtsA turnover and/or polymeric state [56,59]. In the periplasm, the CCD of FtsN converts the septal cell wall synthesis enzymes into an active state either through direct interaction with septal cell wall synthases FtsI and/or FtsW or indirectly through the regulatory FtsQLB complex [20,21,64,73]. Cytoplasmic and periplasmic interactions initiate a positive feedback loop, promoting FtsN accumulation iteratively until a threshold level of divisome activity is reached to promote constriction. Constriction exposes denuded glycans in the septal peptidoglycan through the action of the amidases and further enhances FtsN recruitment via the SPOR domain [53]. The iterative, self-reinforcing nature of this activation cascade ensures completion of cross-wall synthesis and the viability of the two daughter cells. Under alkaline conditions, impaired FtsN recruitment delays initiation of constriction until a larger cell size is reached.

While our data favor a specific role for FtsN in driving pH-dependent changes in E. coli size, we anticipate that pH has pleiotropic effects on the division machinery. In particular, we speculate that pH affects many, if not all, of the extracellular divisome proteins either by directly impacting activity or through more subtle changes in protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this model, we and others have previously identified a handful of pH sensitive extracellular cell wall enzymes with diverse enzymatic functions [46,7981]. S. aureus and S. pneumoniae still undergo pH-dependent changes in size but lack identifiable homologs of FtsN (S3 Fig) [25], indicating the existence of additional pH-responsive divisome components at least in these organisms. Recent technological advancements, including the use of FRET biosensors to probe interactions between division proteins and new methods to assay activity and interactions between the membrane-associated divisome components, offer promising avenues to dissect the impact of pH specific divisome interactions in future studies [64,82].

A threshold level of divisome activity dictates cell size

Our data support a refinement of the threshold model for cytokinesis. As first proposed by the Jun lab, the current threshold model states division is coordinated with cell size via growth rate-dependent accumulation of key division proteins to threshold numbers at the future site of septation [3]. In light of our findings, we favor a “general threshold” model, in which a threshold level of divisome activity must be attained prior to cytokinesis and thus dictates homeostatic cell size. In this revised model, cell division can be coordinated with cell size through disparate, if complementary, mechanisms. These mechanisms include changes in the specific number of critical divisome proteins at midcell as proposed by Si et al. and others [35,19,83,84], alterations in the affinity of divisome proteins for the cytokinetic ring (this work), and changes in the activation state of key regulatory proteins within the ring itself [20,21,85]. Significantly, tuning divisome activity through a variety of mechanisms increases flexibility and allows cells to modulate size in response to a variety of signals. Cytosolic signals (e.g., metabolic state, DNA replication status) may be communicated to the division machinery via regulation of FtsZ or other cytosolic divisome components [4,5], whereas environmental signals that preferentially affect the properties of the periplasm (e.g., pH, osmolarity) could be relayed through differential assembly or activation of the late division machinery rather than through canonical signal transduction cascades (Fig 7).

The physical and chemical environment as a mediator of extracellular processes

More broadly, our results point to the chemical and physical environment as an important mediator of extracytoplasmic processes [86]. Environmental pH, in particular, appears to modulate the activity of several cell wall enzymes in E. coli, including the class A PBPs [46], the lytic transglycosylase MltA [79], and the carboxypeptidases PBP5 and PBP6b [80]. The septal cell wall synthesis machinery in Salmonella is similarly pH sensitive [81]. However, pH sensitivity may represent just the ‘tip of the iceberg’. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear, media osmolarity affects the growth of cells harboring conditional mutants of division genes, dictates essentiality of FtsEX for division, and modulates cell size in E. coli [47,87,88]. Extracellular metal availability also alters the activity of several nonessential cell wall enzymes [8991]. Improved understanding of how extracellular processes cope with dynamic environments promises to shed light on how single celled organisms survive—and thrive—across a wide range of ecological niches.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions

Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals, media components, and antibiotics were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S1 Table, respectively. All E. coli experiments, with the exception of Fig 6D and SI Appendix S3 Fig, were performed in the MG1655 background, referred to as ‘wild type’ in the text. P1 transduction was used to move alleles of interest between strains, and transductants were confirmed with diagnostic PCR. Mutants were generated using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (New England Biolabs) and confirmed with sequencing. Unless otherwise indicated, E. coli strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) media (1% tryptone, 1% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract) with the pH fixed with concentrated NaOH or HCl prior to autoclaving and supplemented with 0.2% glucose. Media pH was confirmed after sterilization. S. aureus strains were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with the pH fixed with concentrated NaOH or HCl prior to autoclaving. Where indicated, media was supplemented with 100 mM MES (pH 5.0) or HEPES (pH 7.0 or 8.0) buffers. Cells were cultured in the indicated media at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm. When selection was necessary, cultures were supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin (Kan), 30 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Cm), 12.5 μg/mL tetracycline (Tet), and/or 25–100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp).

Image acquisition

Phase contrast and fluorescence images of fixed cells were acquired from samples on 1% agarose/PBS pads with an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with a 100X Plan N (N.A. = 1.25) Ph3 objective (Olympus), X-Cite 120 LED light source (Lumen Dynamics), and an OrcaERG CCD camera (Hammamatsu Photonics) or a Nikon TiE inverted microscope equipped with a 100X Plan N (N.A. = 1.25) objective (Nikon), SOLA SE Light Engine (Lumencor), heated control chamber (OKO Labs), and ORCA-Flash4.0 sCMOS camera (Hammamatsu Photonics). Filter sets for fluorescence were purchased from Chroma Technology Corporation. Nikon Elements software (Nikon Instruments) was used for image capture.

Cell size analysis

To achieve balanced growth, cells were cultured from a single colony and grown to exponential phase (OD600 ~ 0.2–0.6). Cultures were then back-diluted into fresh media to an OD600 = 0.005 and grown to early exponential phase (OD600 between 0.1–0.2) prior to being sampled and fixed for analysis. Cells (500 uL) were fixed by adding 20 μL of 1M NaPO4 (pH 7.4) and 100 μL of fixative (16% paraformaldehyde and 8% glutaraldehyde). Samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min then on ice for 30 min. Fixed cells were pelleted, washed three times in 1 mL 1X PBS (pH 7.4), then resuspended in GTE buffer (glucose-tris-EDTA) and stored at 4°C. Images were acquired for analysis within 48 hr of fixation. Cell length, width, and area of E. coli cells were determined from phase contrast images using either the ImageJ plugin Coli-Inspector (Figs 1 and 6) [50] or the MATLAB software SuperSegger (Fig 5) [92]. For S. aureus, cell radii were manually measured and used to calculate cell area. Cell measurements from at least 200 cells from each of at least 3 biological replicates were used to generate single point plots and histograms. Wild type or reference controls were performed during each experiment.

Time lapse microscopy

Wild type cells in early exponential phase (OD600 between 0.1–0.2; 5 μl) were transferred to a 1% agarose/LB + 0.2% glucose pad at the indicated pH, allowed to dry for 10 minutes, and then imaged on a Nikon TiE inverted microscope heated to 37°C. Phase contrast images were acquired every 2 minutes for 2 hours. ΔL (change in length) for each cell was calculated from Ldivision−Lbirth in SuperSegger [92]. Cells that existed for fewer than 2 frames or more than 20 frames or grew by less than 0.5 uM between birth and death were excluded from the analysis.

Septal ring frequency analysis

Strains producing GFP fusions were cultured, sampled, and fixed as in the section entitled ‘Cell size analysis.’ Induction conditions for each strain are provided in S3 Table. Phase contrast and fluorescence images were acquired on either a Nikon TiE inverted microscope or Olympus BX51 microscope. The presence of a GFP ‘ring’ for each cell was determined manually: cells were considered positive for a septal ring if they contained a visible band of GFP across the width of the cells or if a single spot of GFP was visible at the midpoint of an invaginating septum. Septal ring frequencies were determined from at least 200 cells from each of at least 3 biological replicates to generate single point plots.

Heat-sensitivity assays

Strains harboring alleles that encode for heat-sensitive variants of division proteins were grown in LB (pH 7.0) at 30°C until mid-log phase (OD600 ~ 0.2–0.6). Cells were pelleted, washed 1x in LB- no salt medium, and resuspend in LB-no salt media to an OD600 = 1.0. Cells were diluted in LB-no salt medium, and serial dilutions 10−1 to 10−6 were plated under permissive and non-permissive conditions for each mutant with the pH of the plate varying. Plates were incubated for 20 hours. Each experiment was performed at least three times with representative images shown. The permissive condition shown for strains harboring the ftsZ84, ftsA27, and ftsQ1 alleles is LB-no salt plates incubated at 30°C; the non-permissive condition shown for these strains is LB-no salt plates incubated at 37°C. The permissive conditions shown for strains harboring the ftsI23 and ftsK44 alleles are LB-no salt plates incubated at 37°C; the non-permissive condition shown for these strains is LB-no salt plates incubated at 42°C.

Immunoblotting

Strains were grown from a single colony in LB at the indicated pH to mid-log phase (OD600 ~0.2–0.6), back-diluted to 0.005 in 5 mL of media and grown to an OD600 between 0.2–0.3. For experiments measuring native FtsN levels, a MG1655 malE::kan strain was used to eliminate cross-reactivity with the similarly sized maltose binding protein, as antiserum was raised against a FtsN-MBP fusion protein. Samples were pelleted, re-suspended in 2x Laemmli buffer to an OD600 ~20, and boiled for ten minutes. Samples of equivalent volumes were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels by standard electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were probed with FtsN (1:5000), GFP (1:2000; Abcam), and FtsZ (1:5000) rabbit antiserum and HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000–1:10000; goat anti-rabbit). Blots were imaged on a LiCor Odyssey imager. Quantitation was determined in FIJI on background subtracted images and normalized to Ponceau staining as a total protein loading control [93].

FtsN depletion

Strains were grown from a single colony in LB (pH 7.0) in the presence of inducer (0.2% arabinose) at the indicated pH to mid-log phase (OD600 ~0.2–0.6). Cells were pelleted, washed 3x in LB media (no inducer), and resuspend in LB to an OD600 = 1.0. Cells were diluted in LB pH 7.0 media, and serial dilutions 10−2 to 10−7 were plated onto plates with and without inducer (0.2% arabinose) at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Plates were incubated for 20 hours. Each experiment was performed at least three times with representative images shown.

Statistical analysis

A minimum of three biological replicates were performed for each experimental condition unless otherwise indicated. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SE). Statistical tests employed are indicated in the text and corresponding Fig legend. Analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. Asterisks indicate significance as follows: *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. pH-dependent changes in cell size are independent of growth medium and buffering capacity.

A-C) Cell area distribution of MG1655 grown to steady state in AB minimal medium + 0.2% glucose (A), MOPS minimal medium + 0.2% glucose (B), or LB medium supplemented with 100 mM MES (pH 5.5) or HEPES (pH 7.0 or pH 8.0) (C) and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. D) Fraction of cells present in chains as a function of medium pH during growth in MOPS minimal medium + 0.2% glucose. E) Change in pH as a function of optical density in unbuffered LB medium. Cells were inoculated at an OD600 = 0.005.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Distribution of MG1655 cell lengths as a function of pH (A) or upon gfp-ftsN overexpression from pCH201 plasmid (B).

Related to Figs 1 and 5.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Evolutionarily distant bacteria undergo pH-dependent changes in cell size.

A-B) Representative micrographs and cell area distributions for E. coli strain W3110 grown to steady state in LB + 0.2% glucose (A) and S. aureus strain Newman grown in TSB (B) at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Scale bar denotes 5 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Accessory divisome factors do not participate in pH-dependent changes in cell size.

A-B) Cell area distributions for MG1655 strains defective for PBP1a (mrcA::frt, EAM899) and PBP1b (mrcB::frt, EAM696) production during steady state growth in LB + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. C) Representative micrographs of MG1655 strain defective for FtsP (ftsP::kan, EAM1081) during steady state growth in LB + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5 (left) and pH 8.0 (right). Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Mutants producing heat-sensitive variants of late division proteins are suppressed in acidic conditions and enhanced in alkaline conditions.

A) Representative plating efficiency for cells producing unique heat-sensitive variants of FtsZ (PAL2452, PAM161), FtsA (WM4107, MM61), and FtsI (WM4649, AX655) during growth at permissive (left) or non-permissive (right) conditions. B) Representative plating efficiency for cells harboring the ftsQ1 allele (EC433) upon exposure to a wide pH range under permissive (left) and non-permissive (right) conditions. C) Table summarizing suppression and enhancement data for strains harboring temperature sensitive variants in late division proteins (EC433, ftsQ1; WM2101, ftsK44; WM4649, ftsI23) across a range of pH conditions. ++, +, and −denote complete, partial, or no suppression at the indicated pH. **, *, and −denote complete, partial, or no enhancement at the indicated pH.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Production of GFP-tagged division proteins does not eliminate pH-dependent changes in cell length.

A-E) Cell length distributions of cells overexpressing tagged division proteins, including FtsZ-GFP (A, BH330), GFP-FtsA (B, EAM410), GFP-FtsL (C, PAL3700), GFP-FtsI (D, EAM412), and FtsN (E, EAM621) during steady state growth in LB medium at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Midcell intensity of GFP-tagged late division proteins across pH conditions.

A-C) Mid-cell intensity quantifications (right) and demographs (left) for cells producing GFP-FtsN (A, EAM621), GFP-FtsI (B, EAM412), or GFP-FtsL (C, PAL3700).

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Septal ring frequency of FtsZ-GFP (BH330), GFP-FtsA (EAM410), GFP-FtsL (PAL3700), and GFP-FtsI (EAM412) across a wider pH range.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Production of FtsN does not vary across pH conditions.

A) Uncropped membrane shown in Fig 3 probed with anti-MBP-FtsN sera (top) and anti-FtsZ sera (middle) or strained with Ponceau reagent for total protein levels (bottom). Arrow indicates degradation or processed FtsN band. B) Quantification of relative FtsN and FtsZ levels as a function of pH. Bars depict mean relative levels of each protein ± SD relative to pH 7.0 from three independent cultures and normalized for total protein load as determined by Ponceau stain. C) FtsN degradation product as a percentage of total FtsN across pH conditions.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Production of GFP-FtsN does not vary across pH conditions or strain background.

A) Western blot for GFP-FtsN levels (EAM621) from cells grown to steady state in LB medium at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Three replicates for each pH condition are shown. B) Western blot depicting GFP-FtsN levels from MG1655 (EAM621), ftsA* (EAM747), and ftsL* (EAM749) grown to steady state in LB medium (pH 7.0). Three biological replicates are shown for each strain.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. ftsN overexpression suppresses the heat sensitivity of late division protein variants and bypasses the essential function of FtsK.

A) Representative plating efficiency for cells producing heat sensitive variants of division proteins (PAL2452, ftsZ84; WM4107, ftsA27; WM2101, ftsK44; EC433, ftsQ1; WM4649, ftsI23) under non-permissive growth conditions in the presence (right) or absence (left) of ftsN overexpression (pCH201; 1 mM IPTG). B) MG1655 can grow in the absence of FtsK (EAM1311) upon ftsN overexpression (1 mM IPTG).

(TIF)

S12 Fig. Impact of late division protein overproduction on cell length and growth.

A-B) Cell length of MG1655 producing excess FtsN (pBAD33-ftsN; A) or FtsI (pBAD18-ftsI; B) during steady state growth in LB medium. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Bars represent mean cell length ± SEM from three independent biological replicates (n > 200 cells per replicate). C) Representative growth curves for WT (MG1655) cells +/- ftsN overexpression plasmids during growth in LB medium or AB minimal medium + 0.2% glycerol. Cells were grown to steady state in LB medium (uninduced) then inoculated into a 96-well plate in the indicated medium with and without inducer.

(TIF)

S13 Fig. Production of GFP-FtsN variants.

A-B) Representative Western blots for GFP-FtsN truncations (A) or point mutants (B) expressed in MG1655 during steady state growth in LB medium (+1 mM IPTG) and probed with anti-GFP.

(TIF)

S14 Fig. ftsN depletion across pH conditions.

A) Representative plating efficiency for ftsN depletion in WT (HSC074/pBAD33-ftsN), ftsA* (EAM719/pBAD33-ftsN), and ftsL* (EAM723/pBAD33-ftsN) cells at pH 5.5 (bottom) or neutral pH (right) across induction conditions. Image is representative of three biological replicates. B) Representative plating efficiency for temperature-dependent ftsN depletion in WT (MG1655/ Psyn135::ftsN) at pH 5.5 (bottom) or neutral pH (right). Image is representative of three biological replicates.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Impact of pH on cell dimensions of MG1655 in LB medium.

(PDF)

S3 Table. GFP septal ring frequencies across pH conditions in LB medium.

(PDF)

S4 Table. Impact of ftsN overexpression on cell size in LB medium.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank David Weiss, Thomas Bernhardt, Piet de Boer, Bill Margolin, and Joe Lutkenhaus for kind gifts of strains, plasmids, and antibodies necessary to carry out this work. We thank David Weiss and members of the Levin lab for helpful discussions, as well as Stephen Vadia for critical reading of the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM127331 to PAL (https://www.nigms.nih.gov), an Arnold O. Beckman postdoctoral fellowship to CSW (http://www.beckman-foundation.org/programs/beckman-postdoctoral-fellows), National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship DGE-1745038 to EAM (https://www.nsfgrfp.org), and a Center for Science and Engineering of Living Systems graduate scholar fellowship to EAM (https://livingsystems.wustl.edu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Campos M, Surovtsev IV, Kato S, Paintdakhi A, Beltran B, Ebmeier SE, et al. A constant size extension drives bacterial cell size homeostasis. Cell. 2014;159: 1433–1446. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taheri-Araghi S, Bradde S, Sauls JT, Hill NS, Levin PA, Paulsson J, et al. Cell-Size Control and Homeostasis in Bacteria. Curr Biol. 2017;27: 1392 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Si F, Le Treut G, Sauls JT, Vadia S, Levin PA, Jun S. Mechanistic Origin of Cell-Size Control and Homeostasis in Bacteria. Curr Biol. 2019;29: 1760–1770.e7. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weart RB, Lee AH, Chien A-C, Haeusser DP, Hill NS, Levin PA. A metabolic sensor governing cell size in bacteria. Cell. 2007;130: 335–347. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hill NS, Buske PJ, Shi Y, Levin PA. A moonlighting enzyme links Escherichia coli cell size with central metabolism. Casadesús J, editor. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003663 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fantes P, Nurse P. Control of cell size at division in fission yeast by a growth-modulated size control over nuclear division. Exp Cell Res. 1977;107: 377–386. 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90359-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bachmann BJ. Pedigrees of some mutant strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Bacteriol Rev. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 1972;36: 525–557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Casadaban MJ. Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J Mol Biol. 1976;104: 541–555. 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90119-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vadia S, Tse JL, Lucena R, Yang Z, Kellogg DR, Wang JD, et al. Fatty Acid Availability Sets Cell Envelope Capacity and Dictates Microbial Cell Size. Curr Biol. 2017;27: 1757–1767.e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Billaudeau C, Chastanet A, Yao Z, Cornilleau C, Mirouze N, Fromion V, et al. Contrasting mechanisms of growth in two model rod-shaped bacteria. Nature Communications 2016 7. Nature Publishing Group; 2017;8: 15370 10.1038/ncomms15370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Monahan LG, Hajduk IV, Blaber SP, Charles IG, Harry EJ. Coordinating bacterial cell division with nutrient availability: a role for glycolysis. Gottesman S, editor. MBio. 3rd ed. 2014;5: e00935–14. 10.1128/mBio.00935-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Westfall CS, Levin PA. Comprehensive analysis of central carbon metabolism illuminates connections between nutrient availability, growth rate, and cell morphology in Escherichia coli. Søgaard-Andersen L, editor. PLoS Genet. Public Library of Science; 2018;14: e1007205 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aarsman MEG, Piette A, Fraipont C, Vinkenvleugel TMF, Nguyen-Distèche M, Blaauwen den T. Maturation of the Escherichia coli divisome occurs in two steps. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2005;55: 1631–1645. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04502.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haeusser DP, Margolin W. Splitsville: structural and functional insights into the dynamic bacterial Z ring. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2011 10:2. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;14: 305–319. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Slonczewski JL, Rosen BP, Alger JR, Macnab RM. pH homeostasis in Escherichia coli: measurement by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance of methylphosphonate and phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Academy of Sciences; 1981;78: 6271–6275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilks JC, Slonczewski JL. pH of the cytoplasm and periplasm of Escherichia coli: rapid measurement by green fluorescent protein fluorimetry. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology; 2007;189: 5601–5607. 10.1128/JB.00615-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chakraborty S, Winardhi RS, Morgan LK, Yan J, Kenney LJ. Non-canonical activation of OmpR drives acid and osmotic stress responses in single bacterial cells. Nature Communications 2016 7. Nature Publishing Group; 2017;8: 1587 10.1038/s41467-017-02030-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ishino F, Jung HK, Ikeda M, Doi M, Wachi M, Matsuhashi M. New mutations fts-36, lts-33, and ftsW clustered in the mra region of the Escherichia coli chromosome induce thermosensitive cell growth and division. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 1989;171: 5523–5530. 10.1128/jb.171.10.5523-5530.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Modell JW, Kambara TK, Perchuk BS, Laub MT. A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. Michel B, editor. PLoS Biol. 2014;12: e1001977 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu B, Persons L, Lee L, de Boer PAJ. Roles for both FtsA and the FtsBLQ subcomplex in FtsN-stimulated cell constriction in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2015;95: 945–970. 10.1111/mmi.12906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsang M-J, Bernhardt TG. A role for the FtsQLB complex in cytokinetic ring activation revealed by an ftsL allele that accelerates division. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2015;95: 925–944. 10.1111/mmi.12905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lambert A, Vanhecke A, Archetti A, Holden S, Schaber F, Pincus Z, et al. Constriction Rate Modulation Can Drive Cell Size Control and Homeostasis in C. crescentus. iScience. 2018;4: 180–189. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.05.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bilobrov VM, Chugaj AV, Bessarabov VI. Urine pH variation dynamics in healthy individuals and stone formers. Urol Int. Karger Publishers; 1990;45: 326–331. 10.1159/000281730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Watson BW, Meldrum SJ, Riddle HC, Brown RL, Sladen GE. pH profile of gut as measured by radiotelemetry capsule. Br Med J. BMJ Publishing Group; 1972;2: 104–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perez AJ, Cesbron Y, Shaw SL, Bazan Villicana J, Tsui H-CT, Boersma MJ, et al. Movement dynamics of divisome proteins and PBP2x:FtsW in cells of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116: 3211–3220. 10.1073/pnas.1816018116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heinrich K, Leslie DJ, Morlock M, Bertilsson S, Jonas K. Molecular Basis and Ecological Relevance of Caulobacter Cell Filamentation in Freshwater Habitats. Justice S, editor. MBio. American Society for Microbiology; 2019;10: 162 10.1128/mBio.01557-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hale CA, de Boer PA. Direct binding of FtsZ to ZipA, an essential component of the septal ring structure that mediates cell division in E. coli. Cell. 1997;88: 175–185. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81838-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coltharp C, Buss J, Plumer TM, Xiao J. Defining the rate-limiting processes of bacterial cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Academy of Sciences; 2016;113: E1044–53. 10.1073/pnas.1514296113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang X, Lyu Z, Miguel A, McQuillen R, Huang KC, Xiao J. GTPase activity-coupled treadmilling of the bacterial tubulin FtsZ organizes septal cell wall synthesis. Science. 2017;355: 744–747. 10.1126/science.aak9995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu G, Draper GC, Donachie WD. FtsK is a bifunctional protein involved in cell division and chromosome localization in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 1998;29: 893–903. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00986.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen JC, Beckwith J. FtsQ, FtsL and FtsI require FtsK, but not FtsN, for co-localization with FtsZ during Escherichia coli cell division. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2001;42: 395–413. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02640.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guzman LM, Weiss DS, Beckwith J. Domain-swapping analysis of FtsI, FtsL, and FtsQ, bitopic membrane proteins essential for cell division in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 1997;179: 5094–5103. 10.1128/jb.179.16.5094-5103.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taguchi A, Welsh MA, Marmont LS, Lee W, Sjodt M, Kruse AC, et al. FtsW is a peptidoglycan polymerase that is functional only in complex with its cognate penicillin-binding protein. Nat Microbiol. Nature Publishing Group; 2019;2: a000414 10.1038/s41564-018-0345-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Addinall SG, Cao C, Lutkenhaus J. FtsN, a late recruit to the septum in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 1997;25: 303–309. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4641833.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gerding MA, Liu B, Bendezú FO, Hale CA, Bernhardt TG, de Boer PAJ. Self-enhanced accumulation of FtsN at Division Sites and Roles for Other Proteins with a SPOR domain (DamX, DedD, and RlpA) in Escherichia coli cell constriction. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2009;191: 7383–7401. 10.1128/JB.00811-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Du S, Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J. FtsEX acts on FtsA to regulate divisome assembly and activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113: E5052–61. 10.1073/pnas.1606656113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Durand-Heredia JM, Yu HH, De Carlo S, Lesser CF, Janakiraman A. Identification and characterization of ZapC, a stabilizer of the FtsZ ring in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2011;193: 1405–1413. 10.1128/JB.01258-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hale CA, Shiomi D, Liu B, Bernhardt TG, Margolin W, Niki H, et al. Identification of Escherichia coli ZapC (YcbW) as a component of the division apparatus that binds and bundles FtsZ polymers. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2011;193: 1393–1404. 10.1128/JB.01245-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Durand-Heredia J, Rivkin E, Fan G, Morales J, Janakiraman A. Identification of ZapD as a cell division factor that promotes the assembly of FtsZ in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2012;194: 3189–3198. 10.1128/JB.00176-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Samaluru H, SaiSree L, Reddy M. Role of SufI (FtsP) in cell division of Escherichia coli: evidence for its involvement in stabilizing the assembly of the divisome. J Bacteriol. 2007;189: 8044–8052. 10.1128/JB.00773-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bertsche U, Kast T, Wolf B, Fraipont C, Aarsman MEG, Kannenberg K, et al. Interaction between two murein (peptidoglycan) synthases, PBP3 and PBP1B, in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2006;61: 675–690. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05280.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Banzhaf M, van den Berg van Saparoea B, Terrak M, Fraipont C, Egan A, Philippe J, et al. Cooperativity of peptidoglycan synthases active in bacterial cell elongation. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2012;85: 179–194. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08103.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bernhardt TG, de Boer PAJ. The Escherichia coli amidase AmiC is a periplasmic septal ring component exported via the twin-arginine transport pathway. Mol Microbiol. NIH Public Access; 2003;48: 1171–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schmidt KL, Peterson ND, Kustusch RJ, Wissel MC, Graham B, Phillips GJ, et al. A predicted ABC transporter, FtsEX, is needed for cell division in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 785–793. 10.1128/JB.186.3.785-793.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Du S, Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J. FtsEX acts on FtsA to regulate divisome assembly and activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Academy of Sciences; 2016;113: E5052–61. 10.1073/pnas.1606656113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mueller EA, Egan AJ, Breukink E, Vollmer W, Levin PA. Plasticity of Escherichia coli cell wall metabolism promotes fitness and antibiotic resistance across environmental conditions. eLife. eLife Sciences Publications Limited; 2019;8: 492 10.7554/eLife.40754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ricard M, Hirota Y. Process of cellular division in Escherichia coli: physiological study on thermosensitive mutants defective in cell division. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 1973;116: 314–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dai K, Xu Y, Lutkenhaus J. Cloning and characterization of ftsN, an essential cell division gene in Escherichia coli isolated as a multicopy suppressor of ftsA12(Ts). J Bacteriol. 1993;175: 3790–3797. 10.1128/jb.175.12.3790-3797.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Broome-Smith JK, Hedge PJ, Spratt BG. Production of thiol-penicillin-binding protein 3 of Escherichia coli using a two primer method of site-directed mutagenesis. EMBO J. European Molecular Biology Organization; 1985;4: 231–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vischer NOE, Verheul J, Postma M, van den Berg van Saparoea B, Galli E, Natale P, et al. Cell age dependent concentration of Escherichia coli divisome proteins analyzed with ImageJ and ObjectJ. Front Microbiol. Frontiers; 2015;6: 586 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pichoff S, Du S, Lutkenhaus J. The bypass of ZipA by overexpression of FtsN requires a previously unknown conserved FtsN motif essential for FtsA-FtsN interaction supporting a model in which FtsA monomers recruit late cell division proteins to the Z ring. Mol Microbiol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2015;95: 971–987. 10.1111/mmi.12907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Busiek KK, Eraso JM, Wang Y, Margolin W. The early divisome protein FtsA interacts directly through its 1c subdomain with the cytoplasmic domain of the late divisome protein FtsN. J Bacteriol. 2012;194: 1989–2000. 10.1128/JB.06683-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yahashiri A, Jorgenson MA, Weiss DS. Bacterial SPOR domains are recruited to septal peptidoglycan by binding to glycan strands that lack stem peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112: 11347–11352. 10.1073/pnas.1508536112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pichoff S, Du S, Lutkenhaus J. Disruption of divisome assembly rescued by FtsN-FtsA interaction in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Academy of Sciences; 2018;180: 201806450 10.1073/pnas.1806450115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stoddard A, Rolland V. I see the light! Fluorescent proteins suitable for cell wall/apoplast targeting in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plant Direct. 2019;3: e00112 10.1002/pld3.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Baranova N, Radler P, Hernández-Rocamora VM, Alfonso C, López-Pelegrín M, Rivas G, et al. Diffusion and capture permits dynamic coupling between treadmilling FtsZ filaments and cell division proteins. Nat Microbiol. Nature Publishing Group; 2020;16: 38–11. 10.1038/s41564-019-0657-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sekar K, Rusconi R, Sauls JT, Fuhrer T, Noor E, Nguyen J, et al. Synthesis and degradation of FtsZ quantitatively predict the first cell division in starved bacteria. Molecular Systems Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018;14: e8623 10.15252/msb.20188623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Geissler B, Shiomi D, Margolin W. The ftsA* gain-of-function allele of Escherichia coli and its effects on the stability and dynamics of the Z ring. Microbiology (Reading, Engl). Microbiology Society; 2007;153: 814–825. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/001834-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Krupka M, Rowlett VW, Morado D, Vitrac H, Schoenemann K, Liu J, et al. Escherichia coli FtsA forms lipid-bound minirings that antagonize lateral interactions between FtsZ protofilaments. Nature Communications 2016 7. Nature Publishing Group; 2017;8: 305–12. 10.1038/ncomms15957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bernard CS, Sadasivam M, Shiomi D, Margolin W. An altered FtsA can compensate for the loss of essential cell division protein FtsN in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2007;64: 1289–1305. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05738.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.SCHAECHTER M, MAALOE O, KJELDGAARD NO. Dependency on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balanced grown of Salmonella typhimurium. J Gen Microbiol. Microbiology Society; 1958;19: 592–606. 10.1099/00221287-19-3-592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ursell T, Lee TK, Shiomi D, Shi H, Tropini C, Monds RD, et al. Rapid, precise quantification of bacterial cellular dimensions across a genomic-scale knockout library. BMC Biol. BioMed Central; 2017;15: 17–15. 10.1186/s12915-017-0348-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Campos M, Govers SK, Irnov I, Dobihal GS, Cornet F, Jacobs-Wagner C. Genomewide phenotypic analysis of growth, cell morphogenesis, and cell cycle events in Escherichia coli. Molecular Systems Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018;14: e7573 10.15252/msb.20177573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Boes A, Olatunji S, Breukink E, Terrak M. Regulation of the Peptidoglycan Polymerase Activity of PBP1b by Antagonist Actions of the Core Divisome Proteins FtsBLQ and FtsN. den Blaauwen T, Salama NR, editors. MBio. 2019;10: 220 10.1128/mBio.01912-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Draper GC, McLennan N, Begg K, Masters M, Donachie WD. Only the N-terminal domain of FtsK functions in cell division. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 1998;180: 4621–4627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Goehring NW, Robichon C, Beckwith J. Role for the nonessential N terminus of FtsN in divisome assembly. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2007;189: 646–649. 10.1128/JB.00992-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Peters NT, Dinh T, Bernhardt TG. A Fail-Safe Mechanism in the Septal Ring Assembly Pathway Generated by the Sequential Recruitment of Cell Separation Amidases and Their Activators. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2011;193: 4973–4983. 10.1128/JB.00316-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goehring NW, Gueiros-Filho F, Beckwith J. Premature targeting of a cell division protein to midcell allows dissection of divisome assembly in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2005;19: 127–137. 10.1101/gad.1253805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Corbin BD, Geissler B, Sadasivam M, Margolin W. Z-ring-independent interaction between a subdomain of FtsA and late septation proteins as revealed by a polar recruitment assay. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 7736–7744. 10.1128/JB.186.22.7736-7744.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Daley DO, Skoglund U, Söderström B. FtsZ does not initiate membrane constriction at the onset of division. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6: 33138 10.1038/srep33138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wissel MC, Weiss DS. Genetic analysis of the cell division protein FtsI (PBP3): amino acid substitutions that impair septal localization of FtsI and recruitment of FtsN. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2004;186: 490–502. 10.1128/jb.186.2.490-502.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Busiek KK, Margolin W. A role for FtsA in SPOR-independent localization of the essential Escherichia coli cell division protein FtsN. Mol Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2014;92: 1212–1226. 10.1111/mmi.12623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yang X, McQuillen R, Lyu Z, Phillips-Mason P, La Cruz De A, McCausland JW, et al. FtsW exhibits distinct processive movements driven by either septal cell wall synthesis or FtsZ treadmilling in E. coli. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2019;1: 850073 10.1101/850073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Müller P, Ewers C, Bertsche U, Anstett M, Kallis T, Breukink E, et al. The essential cell division protein FtsN interacts with the murein (peptidoglycan) synthase PBP1B in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 36394–36402. 10.1074/jbc.M706390200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pazos M, Peters K, Casanova M, Palacios P, VanNieuwenhze M, Breukink E, et al. Z-ring membrane anchors associate with cell wall synthases to initiate bacterial cell division. Nature Communications 2016 7. Nature Publishing Group; 2018;9: 5090–12. 10.1038/s41467-018-07559-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cho H, Wivagg CN, Kapoor M, Barry Z, Rohs PDA, Suh H, et al. Bacterial cell wall biogenesis is mediated by SEDS and PBP polymerase families functioning semi-autonomously. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1: 16172–33. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Morè N, Martorana AM, Biboy J, Otten C, Winkle M, Serrano CKG, et al. Peptidoglycan Remodeling Enables Escherichia coli To Survive Severe Outer Membrane Assembly Defect. Kline KA, editor. MBio. 2019;10: a000414 10.1128/mBio.02729-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vigouroux A, Cordier B, Aristov A, Oldewurtel E, Özbaykal G, Chaze T, et al. Cell-wall synthases contribute to bacterial cell-envelope integrity by actively repairing defects. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2019;98: 763508 10.1101/763508 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.van Straaten KE, Dijkstra BW, Vollmer W, Thunnissen A-MWH. Crystal structure of MltA from Escherichia coli reveals a unique lytic transglycosylase fold. J Mol Biol. 2005;352: 1068–1080. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Peters K, Kannan S, Rao VA, Biboy J, Vollmer D, Erickson SW, et al. The Redundancy of Peptidoglycan Carboxypeptidases Ensures Robust Cell Shape Maintenance in Escherichia coli. MBio. 2016;7: e00819–16. 10.1128/mBio.00819-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Castanheira S, Cestero JJ, Rico-Pérez G, García P, Cava F, Ayala JA, et al. A Specialized Peptidoglycan Synthase PromotesSalmonellaCell Division inside Host Cells. Sansonetti PJ, editor. MBio. American Society for Microbiology; 2017;8: e01685–17. 10.1128/mBio.01685-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Meiresonne NY, Consoli E, Mertens LMY, Chertkova AO, Goedhart J, Blaauwen den T. Superfolder mTurquoise2ox optimized for the bacterial periplasm allows high efficiency in vivo FRET of cell division antibiotic targets. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111: 1025–1038. 10.1111/mmi.14206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Weart RB, Levin PA. Growth rate-dependent regulation of medial FtsZ ring formation. J Bacteriol. 2003;185: 2826–2834. 10.1128/JB.185.9.2826-2834.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Modell JW, Hopkins AC, Laub MT. A DNA damage checkpoint in Caulobacter crescentus inhibits cell division through a direct interaction with FtsW. Genes Dev. Cold Spring Harbor Lab; 2011;25: 1328–1343. 10.1101/gad.2038911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Geissler B, Elraheb D, Margolin W. A gain-of-function mutation in ftsA bypasses the requirement for the essential cell division gene zipA in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100: 4197–4202. 10.1073/pnas.0635003100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pazos M, Peters K, Vollmer W. Robust peptidoglycan growth by dynamic and variable multi-protein complexes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;36: 55–61. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Reddy M. Role of FtsEX in cell division of Escherichia coli: viability of ftsEX mutants is dependent on functional SufI or high osmotic strength. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2007;189: 98–108. 10.1128/JB.01347-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dai X, Zhu M. High Osmolarity Modulates Bacterial Cell Size through Reducing Initiation Volume in Escherichia coli. Bowman GR, editor. mSphere. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2018;3: R340 10.1128/mSphere.00430-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Peters K, Pazos M, Edoo Z, Hugonnet J-E, Martorana AM, Polissi A, et al. Copper inhibits peptidoglycan LD-transpeptidases suppressing β-lactam resistance due to bypass of penicillin-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115: 10786–10791. 10.1073/pnas.1809285115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Murphy SG, Alvarez L, Adams MC, Liu S, Chappie JS, Cava F, et al. Endopeptidase Regulation as a Novel Function of the Zur-Dependent Zinc Starvation Response. Salama NR, editor. MBio. 2019;10: 161 10.1128/mBio.02620-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lonergan ZR, Nairn BL, Wang J, Hsu Y-P, Hesse LE, Beavers WN, et al. An Acinetobacter baumannii, Zinc-Regulated Peptidase Maintains Cell Wall Integrity during Immune-Mediated Nutrient Sequestration. Cell Rep. 2019;26: 2009–2018.e6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Stylianidou S, Brennan C, Nissen SB, Kuwada NJ, Wiggins PA. SuperSegger: robust image segmentation, analysis and lineage tracking of bacterial cells. Mol Microbiol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2016;102: 690–700. 10.1111/mmi.13486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. Nature Publishing Group; 2012;9: 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory P Copenhaver, Kristina Jonas

25 Oct 2019

Dear Petra,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Environmental pH impacts division assembly and cell size in Escherichia coli' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciate the attention to an important problem, but agree that some significant modifications are required to improve this manuscript. In particular, reviewer 1 raised substantial concerns regarding the data implicating FtsN in pH-responsiveness and provides suggestions on how these issues can be addressed experimentally and by modifying the text. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Kristina Jonas, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, Mueller and colleagues establish and explore mechanistically the relationship between extracellular pH and cell size in Escherichia coli. They find that cell length is correlated with extracellular pH (lower pH = shorter cells, higher pH = longer cells) implying that cell division is responsive to extracellular pH. They use genetics and imaging to implicate the late-arriving division protein FtsN as a potential mediator of this response. FtsN localizes more frequently and robustly to the division site at low pH than at high pH. In addition, overexpression of ftsN or ftsN truncation variants that include the cytoplasmic domain and CCD is sufficient to induce cell shortening at neutral pH. Hyperactivating mutants in ftsA or ftsL previously shown to bypass essentiality of ftsN render cell division insensitive to pH, though FtsN is more robustly recruited to the division site in those mutants. Collectively, their data lead the authors to propose that in E. coli, acidic pH leads to hyper-recruitment of FtsN, which then leads to activation of the division machinery. They further propose positive feedback from division activation to recruitment of FtsN to robustly trigger cell division.

Overall, the manuscript is clearly presented and, for the most part, logical. The conclusion that activation of cell division is responsive to extracellular pH is well-supported and likely to be of broad interest. However, the conclusion that FtsN is the critical mediator of this regulation in E coli is not sufficiently supported by the data presented. My specific comments are as follows:

Major:

1. The implication of FtsN in mediating pH-responsiveness of the division machinery came initially from localization analysis of 5 division proteins (FtsZ, FtsA, FtsL, FtsI, and FtsN) at varying pH. Ideally localization of other late division proteins should be tested, as well (i.e. FtsW and FtsQ), to gain confidence in the specificity of FtsN enrichment at low pH. Although FtsN is canonically thought to be the last recruit to the divisome in E coli, following FtsI, alternative routes to FtsN recruitment have been suggested under some conditions. Moreover, from supplementary figure S7, GFP-FtsI appears moderately enriched at midcell at lower pH, as well. In addition, it would be useful to have the same full set of data/data analysis presented for each protein imaged either in a main figure or supplement (i.e. for FtsZ, there are images shown in Figure 3D but no demograph or fluorescence quantification as in Figure S7 and, conversely, for FtsI no cell images are shown, but demograph and fluorescence quantification is included). Finally, in the images shown in Figure 3D and E, the total fluorescence appears to decrease as pH increases for both FtsZ-GFP and GFP-FtsN. Is that the case?

2. The second piece of evidence implicating FtsN in pH-responsiveness of division is the observation that overexpression of ftsN or ftsN truncations encoding the cytoplasmic region and CCD cause cell shortening at neutral pH. The authors note that two other previous reports of ftsN overexpression in E. coli did not observe cell shortening and actually reported toxicity and cell lengthening. The authors do not discuss why their results might differ from previously published work. Given that this is the only functional evidence presented in the current manuscript directly linking FtsN enrichment to divisome activation, this requires further elaboration. Did the authors try to acquire the constructs used in prior work and test them in their hands? Did they test overexpression of untagged ftsN truncation/mutant variants?

3. The authors demonstrate that E. coli bearing hyperactivating mutants of ftsA and ftsL that bypass essentiality of ftsN do not change their length in response to pH. In those strains, GFP-FtsN is hyper-enriched at midcell. This led the authors to suggest positive feedback from division activation to FtsN recruitment, which makes sense. However, this brings the chicken-or-egg problem to the pH responsiveness, as the authors note on page 12. Is GFP-FtsN enriched at midcell at low pH, leading to division activation as the authors propose? Or is the divisome hyperactivated at low pH through an FtsN-independent mechanism, causing enrichment of GFP-FtsN at midcell through positive feedback? The authors try to test this by determining if lower levels of FtsN might be sufficient for growth at low pH, as they are in ftsA* and ftsL* mutants, and find that they are not (at least at the arabinose concentration tested - might testing intermediate concentrations be informative?). This suggests that low pH does not hyperactivate division in the same way the ftsA or ftsL mutants that bypass ftsN do, but given the lack of mechanistic detail of the activation pathway for division, a negative result here is insufficient to rule out the possibility that division is hyper activated at low pH through a mechanism independent of FtsN enrichment. Given the broad conservation of pH-responsiveness of cell division, but lack of broad conservation of FtsN, an FtsN-independent mechanism of pH responsiveness seems likely (perhaps working in concert with low pH-mediated FtsN enrichment in E. coli).

4. A number of conclusions are overstated:

a. lines 34-36: “…environmental pH impacts the length at which cells divide by altering the ability of the terminal cell division protein FtsN to localize to the cytokinetic machinery and activate division.” The localization is fairly well-supported, but there is no evidence presented that supports the conclusion that pH impacts the ability of FtsN to activate division. Do the authors mean “to localize to the cytokinetic machinery where it activates division”?

b. lines 282 and 927: “Acidic pH activates division through FtsN”. This section and figure title are overstated. The authors show that ftsA and ftsL hypermorphs are not responsive to pH, that FtsN is enriched at midcell in those backgrounds, and that FtsN is not dispensable at low pH. These data are not sufficient to draw the conclusion that low pH activates division through FtsN.

c. line 310: “…our data indicate FtsN is necessary and sufficient for low pH-mediated division activation…”. The overexpression suggests that FtsN is sufficient to induce division hyper-activation, but as that experiment was performed at neutral pH it does not show that FtsN is sufficient to activate division at low pH. Necessity would derive from non-responsiveness of cells lacking FtsN to pH, but as ftsN is apparently essential for growth at all pHs, this cannot be directly assessed.

Other specific points:

5. line 153: “In the final phase of division in proteobacteria, FtsN accumulates at mid-cell and is believed to “trigger” septal PG synthesis…” This has only been shown in E. coli. Though FtsN is conserved in proteobacteria, in Caulobacter it is recruited well before FtsW or FtsI. I know of no evidence in organisms outside of E. coli that implicates FtsN as a trigger for division.

6. line 217: “Because populations of E. coli cell…” should be “E. coli cells”

7. line 248-9. Which strain in Table S4 is this section referring to? Was this supposed to be Table S5?

8. Related to point 7 - it would be really helpful to have brief strain descriptions in each of the tables (e.g. Table S4, S5) to allow the reader to quickly determine what is being expressed in each case. In addition, having relevant strain numbers listed in the figure legends to allow the reader to determine what strain is being used in each experiment would be helpful.

9. line 313: “… influence in its septal…” should be “influence on”

10. lines 337-338: It seems relevant to cite reference 20 here, as they demonstrated an effect of division hypermorphs on cell size homeostasis.

11. Figure 5 legend - there is no legend for 5C, and the legend for 5D is mislabeled as C. At what pH was GFP-FtsN localization assessed in 5C?

12. Figure 6. Label on the Y-axis of the graph in A should be “septal” not “septa”

13. Supplemental tables S1 and S2. Arranging strains and plasmids alphabetically by name would help with ease of reference.

14. Tables S3 and S5. Please define “MDT” in the legend.

Reviewer #2: This well written manuscript of Mueller et al. describes the effect of medium pH on cell division and pin-point the activity to FtsN in an intelligent stepwise genetic dissection approach. The importance resides in the fact that they show that cell size is not simply determined by growth rate, and that several cell division mutants can be bypassed or enhanced by changing the pH. This will facilitate the research in cell division since it opens new avenues to create conditional lethal mutations, a key tool in the investigation of bacterial cell division.

The results are clearly presented and build up logically, except for the last two figures, which might be more logical to reverse. Also, I do not necessarily agree with some of the sub-conclusion they pose (see details below). One additional result that I completely cannot understand is how the SPOR domain by itself (GFP-FtsN(243-319)) can localize at the cell division site (Figure 6A) since this domain would than need an N-terminal signal peptide to get transported into the periplasm. Maybe I missed something, but the authors have to make clear how this is possible.

Detailed comments:

l.59: , size, is

l.71: added

l.83-86: it would be reasonable to add the effect of pyruvate kinase in B. subtilis (Monahan, 2014, MBio).

l.95: as divisome

l.122: size iso area?

Indicate in S3 what MDT is

l.135: maybe mention why W3110 was chosen?

l.225: This conclusion is not correct since the localization of FtsA increases slightly but significantly in Fig. 3B

l.232: in Figure S7 there is also a slight enhancement in FtsI?

l.244: you cannot enhance an interaction by overexpression (you can increase the chance of interaction).

Since Figure 4 discusses the truncation study, the question immediately arises how these truncations behave at different pHs. Therefore it might make more sense to follow with the results that are now presented in Figure 6A. This might make the reasoning also easier (see comments below).

l.286: This reasoning is confusing. Firstly, the explanation stated here is not in line with the two models listed on page 10 line 234-236. Secondly, the suggested activation of FtsA by FtsN has not been mentioned before. Only that FtsN interacts with FtsA. The activation, which is not the same as binding, of FtsQLB, has also not been mentioned earlier on. In any case, because it is not known how those hypermorphic FtsA and FtsL mutants bypasses the need for FtsN it is very hard to draw clear conclusions from negative results, i.e. no effect of pH in these mutants.

l.298: The model that pH regulates FtsA does not make sense since it is dismissed on forehand as it is a cytoplasmic protein, as is also stated in line 323.

l.316: How does GFP-FtsN241-319 gets out of the cell without a signal sequence?

In the Discussion it would be good to mention that FtsN is not present in Staphylococci, so that other late proteins must be affected in this organism.

l.410: references?

l.411-413: Where is the evidence for the first conclusion? Not in Figure 5.

Reviewer #3: This is a well-written and clearly presented study on the effects of environmental pH on cell size in E. coli, showing that growth in acidic pH results in smaller cells compared to neutral and basic pH growth conditions, irrespective of growth rate. Such behavior strongly points towards enhanced cell division at lower pH. The authors present compelling evidence for the enhanced accumulation of FtsN at division sites at low pH as the mechanism underlying the observed reduced cell length. The enhanced localization is dependent on the presence of FtsN’s cytoplasmic FtsA-binding and periplasmic CCD domains, and can partially suppress or totally bypass the essentiality of late division proteins, including FtsI, FtsQ, and FtsK. Although the actual mechanism that triggers enhanced FtsN recruitment by low pH conditions remains unclear, this study contributes more to our understanding of the mechanistic regulation and assembly of the divisome and how extracellular factors can perturb the balance between division and cell size control. However, the manuscript requires some modifications, as indicated below.

Major comments:

1. Given the authors’ previous work on the differential fitness contributions of the Class A PBPs in acidic and basic media, and the recent publication (PMID: 30504892) linking FtsN to the PBPs (which should certainly be cited), the authors need to include some discussion on how their interpretation of their data fits into the previous studies.

2. Fig. 4D is confusing. The histogram actually shows the % of GFP-FtsN at the septum, not FtsN. The % of FtsN at the septal ring is not 0 in WT cells, as it must already be at the septum in order for them to divide. A better measure would be IFM using Anti-FtsN, or to change the Y axis to “GFP-FtsN” and to state more clearly that this is a measure of how much GFP-FtsN localizing to the septum, not total FtsN. The same is true for Fig. 5C.

3. The legend for figure 5 needs to be corrected; the description of panel C is missing and the description for panel D is mislabeled.

4. Can the authors explain why they see stimulation of division by excess FtsN (or GFP-FtsN) whereas previously this was not seen (or excess FtsN inhibited division)? The WT (or uninduced) cell length of >4 µm seems high. Could that be why?

5. Supplementary Figure 4. The authors attempt to show that the pH-dependent changes in cell length are due solely to FtsN by demonstrating that cells deficient in other periplasmic pH-responsive proteins show the same phenotype. However, in their previous publication (ref. 8), ΔmrcB cells did not grow in acidic media and eventually lysed. It seems that this is an inappropriate conclusion to draw from this experiment based on what the authors reported previously.

6. Figures 6A and 4E; lines 321-329. Based on their truncation mutants, the authors conclude that the FtsA-binding domain and CCD domain of FtsN are both required for the cell-shortening phenotype, as well as localization to the septum. They reason that the FtsA binding domain is less important in this interaction since the truncation mutant 1-81 does not exhibit pH-dependent localization. However, this conclusion may be erroneous, as GFP-FtsN(1-55) localizes quite efficiently to the septum as reported in ref. 60. Is the GFP used here different? Or perhaps the region between 55 and 81 of FtsN inhibits its septal localization?

7. The title should be reworded—“division assembly” is an ambiguous term. I suggest replacing “division assembly” with something more specific, such as “cell division”, “division septum formation”, or “cytokinesis”. I am also not a fan of using “impacts” as a verb, but realize that it is now in common usage.

Additional comments:

1. Figure 2: In panel A, the temperature sensitive allele of FtsA is labeled “ftsA12”; however, in the text the primary ts allele of FtsA referenced is FtsA27 (line 180), with FtsA12 being mentioned for the supplementary figure S5 (line 186).

2. Line 192: Fig. 2B is cited here, but it does not show data for ftsA27 or ftsZ84 as stated.

3. Figure 5D. Can the authors comment on why there seems to be a 10-fold increase in growth of WT cells when depleted for FtsN at pH 8.0 compared to pH 5.5 or pH 7.0?

4. Figure 5C; lines 291-292. The authors state that the frequency of GFP-FtsN localization at the septum was similar between FtsA* and FtsL* cells, but it is not clear if they tested or showed this at each pH condition.

5. The “inactive state of divisome proteins in discrete complexes” (lines 400-405) model proposed is similar to that described in Krupka et al. (PMID: 28695917), who proposed that FtsA is maintained in a “locked” mini-ring state prior to divisome activation based on direct visualization of oligomeric structures of FtsA and FtsA* on membranes. That paper also proposed a positive feedback loop among early divisome proteins to activate cytokinesis. The authors should mention this as a possible mechanism, especially given that transition of FtsA from the OFF to ON state is contributing to their model.

6. Lines 237-238: It looks like levels of GFP-FtsN are lower at high pH compared with neutral pH in both Fig. 3E (S8) and Fig. S6. There is also a more prominent degradation/processed band at higher pH. This may or may not be a factor in the sensitivity to high pH, and should be mentioned.

7. Line 249-250: Do the authors have any thoughts as to why cell width increases upon induction of GFP-FtsN?

8. Line 286: The original paper that reported shorter cell lengths from hypermorphic alleles of cell division genes should be cited as well (PMID: 17322202).

9. Line 296: Does the enhanced recruitment of FtsN to the septum cause hyperactivation of FtsA/FtsQLB, or mimic their hyperactivation through some other mechanism? This would seem to be an important distinction.

10. Line 302: The first report that certain alleles of FtsA including FtsA* can survive without functional FtsN should be cited here (PMID: 17542921).

Typos:

Line 217: should be “cells”

Line 313: delete “in”

Figure 2A: “fsK44” should be “ftsK44”.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Gregory P Copenhaver, Kristina Jonas

17 Feb 2020

* Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. *

Dear Petra,

Thank you very much for submitting a revised version of your Research Article entitled 'pH-dependent activation of cytokinesis modulates Escherichia coli cell size' to PLOS Genetics. We have returned your manuscript to reviewer 1, who was satisfied with the changes that you have made, but has suggested a few minor text changes - please address these and we'll be ready to render a decision without further external review.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by the reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Kristina Jonas, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The authors have responded appropriately to my prior concerns. The study is nicely done, and the manuscript is logically and clearly presented. I have only a couple of minor changes to suggest.

1. Lines 136 and 142: "evolutionary distant" should be "evolutionarily distant"

2. Line 223: "differences in in midcell localization" has an extra "in"

3. Line 233: should the figure reference be to Figure 3D, not 3E?

4. Also line 233: "SI Appendix, S8" should be "SI Appendix, Fig. S8" I think

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Decision Letter 2

Gregory P Copenhaver, Kristina Jonas

19 Feb 2020

Dear Petra,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "pH-dependent activation of cytokinesis modulates Escherichia coli cell size" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Kristina Jonas, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-19-01602R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory P Copenhaver, Kristina Jonas

13 Mar 2020

PGENETICS-D-19-01602R2

pH-dependent activation of cytokinesis modulates Escherichia coli cell size

Dear Dr Levin,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "pH-dependent activation of cytokinesis modulates Escherichia coli cell size" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Kaitlin Butler

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. pH-dependent changes in cell size are independent of growth medium and buffering capacity.

    A-C) Cell area distribution of MG1655 grown to steady state in AB minimal medium + 0.2% glucose (A), MOPS minimal medium + 0.2% glucose (B), or LB medium supplemented with 100 mM MES (pH 5.5) or HEPES (pH 7.0 or pH 8.0) (C) and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. D) Fraction of cells present in chains as a function of medium pH during growth in MOPS minimal medium + 0.2% glucose. E) Change in pH as a function of optical density in unbuffered LB medium. Cells were inoculated at an OD600 = 0.005.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Distribution of MG1655 cell lengths as a function of pH (A) or upon gfp-ftsN overexpression from pCH201 plasmid (B).

    Related to Figs 1 and 5.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Evolutionarily distant bacteria undergo pH-dependent changes in cell size.

    A-B) Representative micrographs and cell area distributions for E. coli strain W3110 grown to steady state in LB + 0.2% glucose (A) and S. aureus strain Newman grown in TSB (B) at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0 and collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Scale bar denotes 5 μm.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Accessory divisome factors do not participate in pH-dependent changes in cell size.

    A-B) Cell area distributions for MG1655 strains defective for PBP1a (mrcA::frt, EAM899) and PBP1b (mrcB::frt, EAM696) production during steady state growth in LB + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. C) Representative micrographs of MG1655 strain defective for FtsP (ftsP::kan, EAM1081) during steady state growth in LB + 0.2% glucose at pH 5.5 (left) and pH 8.0 (right). Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Mutants producing heat-sensitive variants of late division proteins are suppressed in acidic conditions and enhanced in alkaline conditions.

    A) Representative plating efficiency for cells producing unique heat-sensitive variants of FtsZ (PAL2452, PAM161), FtsA (WM4107, MM61), and FtsI (WM4649, AX655) during growth at permissive (left) or non-permissive (right) conditions. B) Representative plating efficiency for cells harboring the ftsQ1 allele (EC433) upon exposure to a wide pH range under permissive (left) and non-permissive (right) conditions. C) Table summarizing suppression and enhancement data for strains harboring temperature sensitive variants in late division proteins (EC433, ftsQ1; WM2101, ftsK44; WM4649, ftsI23) across a range of pH conditions. ++, +, and −denote complete, partial, or no suppression at the indicated pH. **, *, and −denote complete, partial, or no enhancement at the indicated pH.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Production of GFP-tagged division proteins does not eliminate pH-dependent changes in cell length.

    A-E) Cell length distributions of cells overexpressing tagged division proteins, including FtsZ-GFP (A, BH330), GFP-FtsA (B, EAM410), GFP-FtsL (C, PAL3700), GFP-FtsI (D, EAM412), and FtsN (E, EAM621) during steady state growth in LB medium at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Midcell intensity of GFP-tagged late division proteins across pH conditions.

    A-C) Mid-cell intensity quantifications (right) and demographs (left) for cells producing GFP-FtsN (A, EAM621), GFP-FtsI (B, EAM412), or GFP-FtsL (C, PAL3700).

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Septal ring frequency of FtsZ-GFP (BH330), GFP-FtsA (EAM410), GFP-FtsL (PAL3700), and GFP-FtsI (EAM412) across a wider pH range.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Production of FtsN does not vary across pH conditions.

    A) Uncropped membrane shown in Fig 3 probed with anti-MBP-FtsN sera (top) and anti-FtsZ sera (middle) or strained with Ponceau reagent for total protein levels (bottom). Arrow indicates degradation or processed FtsN band. B) Quantification of relative FtsN and FtsZ levels as a function of pH. Bars depict mean relative levels of each protein ± SD relative to pH 7.0 from three independent cultures and normalized for total protein load as determined by Ponceau stain. C) FtsN degradation product as a percentage of total FtsN across pH conditions.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Production of GFP-FtsN does not vary across pH conditions or strain background.

    A) Western blot for GFP-FtsN levels (EAM621) from cells grown to steady state in LB medium at pH 5.5, 7.0, and 8.0. Three replicates for each pH condition are shown. B) Western blot depicting GFP-FtsN levels from MG1655 (EAM621), ftsA* (EAM747), and ftsL* (EAM749) grown to steady state in LB medium (pH 7.0). Three biological replicates are shown for each strain.

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. ftsN overexpression suppresses the heat sensitivity of late division protein variants and bypasses the essential function of FtsK.

    A) Representative plating efficiency for cells producing heat sensitive variants of division proteins (PAL2452, ftsZ84; WM4107, ftsA27; WM2101, ftsK44; EC433, ftsQ1; WM4649, ftsI23) under non-permissive growth conditions in the presence (right) or absence (left) of ftsN overexpression (pCH201; 1 mM IPTG). B) MG1655 can grow in the absence of FtsK (EAM1311) upon ftsN overexpression (1 mM IPTG).

    (TIF)

    S12 Fig. Impact of late division protein overproduction on cell length and growth.

    A-B) Cell length of MG1655 producing excess FtsN (pBAD33-ftsN; A) or FtsI (pBAD18-ftsI; B) during steady state growth in LB medium. Cells were collected for imaging at OD600 ~ 0.1–0.2. Bars represent mean cell length ± SEM from three independent biological replicates (n > 200 cells per replicate). C) Representative growth curves for WT (MG1655) cells +/- ftsN overexpression plasmids during growth in LB medium or AB minimal medium + 0.2% glycerol. Cells were grown to steady state in LB medium (uninduced) then inoculated into a 96-well plate in the indicated medium with and without inducer.

    (TIF)

    S13 Fig. Production of GFP-FtsN variants.

    A-B) Representative Western blots for GFP-FtsN truncations (A) or point mutants (B) expressed in MG1655 during steady state growth in LB medium (+1 mM IPTG) and probed with anti-GFP.

    (TIF)

    S14 Fig. ftsN depletion across pH conditions.

    A) Representative plating efficiency for ftsN depletion in WT (HSC074/pBAD33-ftsN), ftsA* (EAM719/pBAD33-ftsN), and ftsL* (EAM723/pBAD33-ftsN) cells at pH 5.5 (bottom) or neutral pH (right) across induction conditions. Image is representative of three biological replicates. B) Representative plating efficiency for temperature-dependent ftsN depletion in WT (MG1655/ Psyn135::ftsN) at pH 5.5 (bottom) or neutral pH (right). Image is representative of three biological replicates.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Impact of pH on cell dimensions of MG1655 in LB medium.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. GFP septal ring frequencies across pH conditions in LB medium.

    (PDF)

    S4 Table. Impact of ftsN overexpression on cell size in LB medium.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponsestoReviews_V3.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponsestoReviews_Round2.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES