Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2005 Jun 25;47(4):230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2005.01.001

Chlamydia Pneumoniae and Atherosclerosis: From Koch Postulates to Clinical Trials

Catherine Liu 1,2,3, David D Waters 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC7118749  PMID: 15991152

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is increasingly viewed as an inflammatory process. A number of infectious agents have been implicated in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. Chlamydia pneumoniae has been the most popular and well-studied of these pathogens. It is difficult to prove a causal relationship which requires the fulfillment of Koch's postulates, first developed in the late 1800s, to establish an infectious agent as the cause of a disease process. This paper reviews the evidence for and against Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a contributing factor to atherosclerosis disease. It examines seroepidemiologic and histopathologic studies as well as animal models using Koch's postulates and then provides an analysis of current clinical trial data.


Infectious agents have been proposed as a potential cause of atherosclerosis since the late 1800s and early 1900s (Table 1 ). In a paper published in 1911, Frothingham1 stated, “Acute infectious diseases may cause some pretty general lesion throughout the arterial system, either from the diffuse action of toxins or from a widespread invasion of the arterial system by the infecting organisms. The exact nature of these lesions in human cases and their final result have not been so well worked out.” Nearly 100 years later, we are still grappling with the same question. This certainly is not the first instance of an infection being linked to a chronic disease. Well-documented associations that have revolutionized disease management include Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease, human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, human herpesvirus 8 and Kaposi sarcoma, and hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although diseases such as scarlet fever, diphtheria, and measles were cited as plausible contributors to the atherosclerotic process in the early 20th century, the control of these pathogens over the ensuing years has given rise to a new cast of suspect agents.

Table 1.

Infection as a Cause of Atherosclerosis: A Historical Perspective

Huchard (1891): infectious diseases of childhood as a cause of atherosclerosis
Wiesner (1906): endocarditis and osteomyelitis associated with coronary arterial calcification
Weisel (1906): typhoid, scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, sepsis, pneumonia, and osteomyelitis associated with atherosclerosis
Osler (1908): “acute infections” including scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, smallpox, and influenza as a cause of atherosclerosis
Burch (1960s): coxsackie B virus linked with atherosclerosis in animal studies
Minick and Fabricant (1980s): Marek disease herpesvirus linked with atherosclerotic lesions is chickens
Ross (1990s): “response to injury” theory of atherogenesis

Infectious Agents Linked to Atherosclerosis in Recent Literature

Infectious agents implicated in atherosclerosis over the past 10 to 15 years include cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), H pylori, and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Like the pathogens formerly under question, exposure to these organisms occurs relatively early on in life, setting the stage for their potential role in the initiation and pathogenesis of the atherosclerotic process. Furthermore, these organisms are similar in that they are all obligate intracellular pathogens capable of maintaining a chronic persistent state in the host.

Data linking herpes viruses to atherosclerosis first came from Marek avian herpes virus, where infection of disease-free chickens with the virus produced arterial lesion.2 A member of the Herpesviridae family, CMV has been associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis and death from coronary disease after cardiac transplant.3, 4, 5 Prior CMV infection has also been linked to increased risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.6 However, data are conflicting with several prospective, nested, case-control studies showing disparate results. Whereas the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study found that high levels of CMV antibodies correlated with an increased risk of coranary artery disease (CAD) during a 5-year follow-up,7 the Physicians Health Study did not find any association between CMV or HSV antibodies and myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke over a 12-year follow-up period.8 The Cardiovascular Health Study found that antibodies to HSV but not CMV were associated with increased risk of MI and cardiovascular death in elderly patients.9

A number of seroepidemiological studies have suggested an association between H pylori and coronary disease, but many of these studies did not adjust appropriately for potential confounders such as socioeconomic status.10 However, 1 case-control study which did adjust for age, sex, other cardiac risk factors, and social class found a correlation between H pylori and coronary disease; this relationship may have been caused by an increased prevalence of more virulent H pylori strains in these patients.11 Unlike the other organisms in question, H pylori has not been detected in atherosclerotic plaque.

In addition, several studies have shown that infectious burden, for example, the number of pathogens to which an individual has been exposed as determined by serology, is associated with the extent of atherosclerotic disease and risk for cardiovascular death.12, 13 The presence of chronic respiratory tract, urinary tract, dental, or other infection was associated in 1 study with a 4-fold increase in the risk of carotid atherosclerosis.14

Conflicting data in the literature regarding the association between infectious pathogens and coronary events make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding their role in disease pathogenesis and therefore potential therapeutic interventions. C pneumoniae has been the best described of these pathogens, and this paper will thus review the current data on C pneumoniae and its potential role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic disease.

Microbiology and Epidemiology of C Pneumoniae

C pneumoniae is an obligate intracellular bacterium capable of chronic or persistent infection. It was first identified 20 years ago as a cause of acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections.15 It has a unique developmental cycle involving 2 morphological forms, the elementary body, and the reticulate body. The former is the infectious form and adapted to extracellular survival, whereas the latter is the metabolically active and dividing form, adapted for intracellular multiplication. In addition, the organism may evolve into a “persistent body,” an intracellular, metabolically inactive, nonreplicating but viable form that allows it to maintain chronic infection and thereby a state of chronic inflammation that may contribute to the atherosclerotic process.

C pneumoniae infection is ubiquitous, with an antibody prevalence of 50% by age 20 and 70% to 80% at age 60 to 70. It accounts for 10% of community-acquired pneumonia and 5% of pharyngitis, bronchitis, and sinusitis.16

Koch's Postulates

In 1886, Robert Koch developed the following criteria that must be satisfied to prove that a specific organism causes a specific disease:

  • 1.

    The pathogen must be present in nearly all cases of disease.

  • 2.

    The pathogen must be isolated from the diseased host and grown in culture.

  • 3.

    The disease must be reproduced when the culture is inoculated into the healthy host.

  • 4.

    The organism must be recovered from the experimentally infected host.

Koch used these criteria to establish bacillus anthracis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and vibrio cholerae as etiologies of anthrax, tuberculosis, and cholera, respectively. Since then, these postulates have been used to determine the causal relationship between an organism and a clinical disease or syndrome, including HIV and AIDS, as well as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–associated coronavirus with SARS.

However, there are several limitations to Koch's postulates. First, bacteria that are part of the normal flora and do not usually cause disease can become pathogenic in certain situations, such as in an immunocompromised host or with penetration into deep tissue. Second, not all of those infected with these organisms will develop overt clinical disease, as the host immune system may clear the organism or the host may develop only subclinical infection. Third, some organisms are difficult to culture or are not culturable in vitro (eg, Mycobacterium leprae) and may lack an animal model of infection. Finally, something not described in Koch postulates that may be useful in proving causality is if eradication of the pathogen results in cure or impedes disease progression. Keeping these considerations in mind, we will use Koch postulates as a framework to assess the potential role of C pneumoniae in atherogenesis in the discussion below.

Koch's Postulate 1: The Pathogen Must be Present in Nearly All Cases of Disease

Seroepidemiological Studies

Lines of evidence supporting Koch's first postulate include seroepidemiological studies and histopathological detection of the organism in atherosclerotic lesions. The first report of a possible association between C pneumoniae and atherosclerosis was described in 1988: in a case-control study of 40 Finnish men admitted for acute MI (AMI) and 41 matched controls, 68% of the AMI patients had elevated chlamydial immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA titers compared with 17% of the controls.17 In a separate nested case-control study of 206 patients from the Helsinki Heart Study, the same group noted a 2 to 3 times increased risk in cardiac events among patients with chronic chlamydial infection after adjusting for classic coronary risk factors.18 A study published by the same authors in 2003 showed that concurrent elevations in CRP in patients with chlamydial seropositivity increased coronary risk from 2- to 3-fold to 4.5-fold.19

Danesh et al10 reviewed 18 seroepidemiological studies (including the 2 described above) in the literature which included 2700 cases and 5000 controls. C pneumoniae antibodies were positively associated with coronary disease in 15 of 16 studies and cerebrovascular diseases in 2 of 2 studies. In the majority of the studies, odds ratios exceeded 2.0. All but 3 of these studies did not adjust for potential confounders. These studies were fairly heterogeneous, varying in the populations studied, the criteria used in defining cardiovascular disease, and the degree of adjustment for confounding variables. However, the overall consistency of their findings suggested a possible association between C pneumoniae and coronary disease.

However, these positive findings have been criticized for a lack of standardized serological methods across studies. The majority of the studies used microimmunofluorescence (MIF) as the serology test. Since it was first developed, this assay has been recognized to be problematic as the test is not standardized and subject to interlaboratory variation.20 Interpretation of the slides requires an experienced microscopist, and there is a large subjective component to this assay, leading to poor reproducibility. It is difficult to establish or rule out a diagnosis of C pneumoniae infection by a single MIF titer. Especially in children, acute culture-documented infection can occur without a positive MIF.21 The high prevalence of infection among the adult population also complicates interpretation of MIF results. One study of healthy adults found that 17% of culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–negative individuals had evidence of “acute” infection by MIF.22

In addition to the problems inherent to the assay, the abovementioned studies were inconsistent in the serological criteria used to define past or chronic persistent infection by the MIF assay. IgG and IgA antibody titer cutoffs varied between studies, and in some cases, titers were selected post hoc after data analysis determined which cutoff provided the strongest association. In a few cases, the same investigators used different criteria in different studies. Another source of potential bias is the lack of blinding of the microscopist performing the MIF assay to the disease status of the patient; only 4 of the studies indicated that blinding occurred.

Furthermore, the majority of these earlier studies were cross-sectional, case-control, or retrospective. More recent prospective studies have not confirmed the association between seropositivity for C pneumoniae and atherosclerosis. Danesh et al23 published a large case-control study nested in a prospective cohort of British men followed over a 16-year period, including 496 men with fatal or nonfatal MI and 989 age- and frequency-matched controls; 40% of the cases compared with 33% of the controls had positive C pneumoniae titers, yielding an odds ratio for coronary heart disease of 1.66 and 1.22 after adjusting for smoking and socioeconomic status. The same group performed an updated meta-analysis including this study and 14 other prospective studies published through May 2000. These studies included a total of 3169 cases of nonfatal MI or coronary death, and all were adjusted for classic coronary risk factors. The combined odds ratio for coronary disease in these 15 prospective studies was 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.97-1.36) compared with 2.0 observed in the earlier meta-analysis published by this group. A recent meta-analysis of 38 seroepidemiological studies between January 1997 and December 2000 also found that the odds ratio for cross-sectional or case-control studies was higher than that of prospective studies (2.0 vs 1.1), with an overall odds ratio of 1.6.24

Although it does not entirely rule out the possibility of an association between C pneumoniae and atherosclerosis, this more recent data suggest that a strong causal relationship is less likely.

Histopathological Studies

The presence of C pneumoniae in atherosclerotic plaques was first described by Shor et al.25 The organism was identified by electron microscopy (EM) and Chlamydia immunoperoxidase staining with genus-specific and species-specific monoclonal antibody in 7 of 7 and 5 of 7 postmortem atheromas, respectively, and in none of the 5 control cases. Gibbs et al26 reviewed 17 studies on the detection of C pneumoniae in atherosclerotic specimens using a variety of detection techniques including PCR, immunocytochemical staining, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization (ISH), and direct culture. The organism was identified in 303 (50.8%) of 597 specimens with atherosclerosis versus only 5 (3.8%) of 131 specimens without atherosclerosis.

Boman and Hammerschlag20 performed an even more extensive review of 43 studies published between 1992 and 2000, including a total of 2644 atherosclerotic specimens. The prevalence of C pneumoniae in atheromas varied significantly depending on the particular detection method used. Immunocytochemistry and PCR were the most commonly used; other techniques included direct cell culture, EM, and ISH. A total of 336 (49.7%) of 676 specimens were positive by immunostaining using Chlamydia genus-specific antibody, and 202 (45.6%) of 443 specimens were positive by immunostaining using C pneumoniae–specific antibody. EM gave positive results in 38 (39.2%) of 97 specimens. The percentage positive by PCR was significantly less, 558 (24.3%) of 2294 specimens, whereas direct culture yielded a prevalence of only 7.3% (33/451 specimens), and ISH was positive in only 1 of 60 specimens examined.

Direct culture of the organism is the gold standard; however, C pneumoniae is difficult to grow in cell culture, making this a very insensitive test and reflecting 1 of the limitations of Koch postulates. The lack of a proper “gold standard” makes interpretation of these results difficult, although the prevalence of the organism in atheromas may be as high as 50%. However, if only those specimens that tested positive by 2 or more independent techniques were considered true positives, the prevalence was reduced significantly. Of the 502 specimens analyzed by 2 or more C pneumoniae techniques, only 76 (16.7%) tested positive on at least 2 assays.

Koch's Postulate 2: The Pathogen Must be Isolated from the Diseased Host and Grown in Culture

Although recovery of C pneumoniae by direct culture is difficult, a number of groups have isolated the organism from atherosclerotic plaque. C pneumoniae was first isolated by direct culture in 1996 from the atheroma of a patient with severe coronary disease.27 Maas et al28 isolated viable C pneumoniae from 16% (11/70) of atheromas from patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, with half of these isolates capable of being permanently propagated by serial subcultures. The organism was not found in any of the nonatherosclerotic control samples. However, 1 group failed to identify any C pneumoniae in patients undergoing atherectomy.29

Koch's Postulate 3: The Disease Must be Reproduced when the Culture is Inoculated into the Healthy Host

There have been no studies that have carried out Koch's third postulate exactly as described, for example, isolated the organism from a diseased host, grown it in culture, and subsequently inoculated the cultured isolate into a healthy host, causing atherosclerotic disease. However, there have been a number of animal studies that have shown that inoculation of C pneumoniae into a healthy host leads to atherosclerotic disease compared with uninfected control animals. Fong et al30 and Laitinen et al31 demonstrated that intranasal inoculation of C pneumoniae into New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits fed a normal diet led to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque compared with uninfected control NZW rabbits. These changes were observed after 1 to 2 weeks in one study and 5 to 7 weeks in the other. A few animals were noted to have lesions containing foamy macrophages and spindle cell proliferation of smooth muscle cells.

Moazed et al32 found that intranasal inoculation of C pneumoniae into apolipoprotein E–deficient mice (a hyperlipidemic mouse model) fed a normal diet accelerated the progression of atherosclerotic lesions compared with uninfected control mice. Lesion area in the inner curvature of the aortic arch was 2.4 and 1.6 times greater at 16 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively, in the infected compared with the control mice.

Muhlstein et al33 randomized 30 NZW rabbits fed a cholesterol-enhanced diet to receive intranasal inoculations of C pneumoniae or saline. Each group was then randomized to a 7-week course of azithromycin or no therapy. Maximal intimal thickening and plaque area index were significantly greater in infected untreated rabbits compared with uninfected controls. Maximal intimal thickening and plaque area index in infected treated rabbits and in uninfected controls did not differ.

Koch's Postulate 4: The Organism Must be Recovered from the Experimentally Infected Host

In the animal studies described above, C pneumoniae could be demonstrated in the vessel walls by immunohistochemical staining and by direct culture after intranasal inoculation.

A Model of Pathogenesis

There are several ways in which C pneumoniae may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic disease.16 First, C pneumoniae may cause the initial injury, inducing the atherosclerotic process. Second, the organism may accelerate the progression of preexisting disease. Third, it may contribute to a disease complication, such as plaque rupture and MI. Finally, it may be an innocent bystander that persists in vascular cells but does not contribute to any pathological abnormality.

A proposed model of pathogenesis is described as follows. First, the organism gains access to the vascular endothelium during local infections of the respiratory tract. Infected leukocytes may disseminate the organism throughout the body with activated macrophages carrying the organism infiltrating the subendothelial layer of the coronary arteries. The organism acts as a stimulus for chronic inflammation, inducing the production of tissue factor, leukocyte adhesion molecules, and inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, and interleukins 1, 2, and 6.26 TNF-α has been observed to increase the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules34 and inhibit lipoprotein lipase, leading to altered lipid metabolism and accumulation of triglycerides in the bloodstream.35 Increased expression of adhesion molecules promotes leukocyte adherence, migration, and intimal inflammation. These inflammatory cytokines together act to stimulate fibroblast and smooth muscle cell proliferation. They also promote a hypercoagulable state by activating platelets, increasing hepatic synthesis of acute-phase proteins, and inducing tissue factor release from the endothelium with activation of the coagulation cascade. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide antigen acts as a potent stimulus for macrophage activation.36 In addition, it binds to low-density lipoprotein, which could modify the lipoprotein, making it toxic or immunogenic to endothelial cells, and subsequently lead to foam cell formation.38 Persistent growth of the organism in situ leads to a state of chronic inflammation, platelet activation, vasospasm, and thrombosis.

C pneumoniae may contribute to atherosclerosis via antigenic mimicry and autoimmunity. Chlamydial heat shock protein 60 (cHsp60) has been isolated in macrophages within atheromatous tissue, colocalizing with its homolog, human hsp.37 A potential mechanism of atherogenesis that has been suggested is that persistent infection with C pneumoniae through the expression of cHsp60 may trigger an autoimmune reaction against human hsp. cHsp60 has also been observed to activate macrophages stimulating TNF-α and matrix metalloproteinase expression, which may contribute to plaque weakening and subsequent rupture.37

Clinical Trials

Although not described in Koch's original postulates, other lines of evidence that may be useful in determining the role of C pneumoniae in the pathogenesis of coronary disease include data from secondary prevention trials in human beings. If C pneumoniae is involved in atherogenesis, then presumably, it can be viewed as a modifiable risk factor treatable with antibiotic therapy in the same way hyperlipidemia is managed with lipid-lowering agents. Completed clinical trials are summarized in Table 2 and ongoing trials in Table 3 .

Table 2.

Completed Clinical Trials

Trial Population Size Follow-up Regimen (vs Placebo) End Points Results
Gupta et al38 Post-MI patients seropositive for Cp antibodies 60 18 mo Azithromycin 500 mg × 3-6 d Composite CV events, Cp antibody titers ↓ CV events, ↓ antibody titers with Rx
ROXIS39 Unstable angina patients 202 1, 6 mo Roxithromycin 150 mg bid ×30 d Composite CV events, Cp antibody titers, CRP levels ↓ CV events at 1 and 6 mo, no change in antibody titers, ↓ CRP levels
ACADEMIC40 CAD patients seropositive for Cp antibodies 302 6 mo, 2 y Azithromycin 500 mg × 3 d, then 500 mg/wk ×3 mo Composite CV events, inflammatory markers No difference in CV events, ↓ CRP and IL-6 at 6 mo
ISAR-344 Coronary-stented patients seropositive for Cp antibodies 1010 1 y Roxithromycin 300 mg every day × 28 d Rate of restenosis, MI, CV death No difference for restenosis, MI or CV death, but ↓ restenosis in patients with high Cp titers
CLARIFY41 Unstable angina/NQWMI patients 148 3 mo, median 555 d Clarithromycin 500 mg every day × 3 mo Composite CV events during treatment and follow-up ↓ CV events at 3 mo and during follow-up
WIZARD42 Post-MI patients seropositive for Cp antibodies 7747 2.5 y Azithromycin 600 mg 4 times a day × 3 d, 600 mg/wk ×11 wk Composite CV events Trend toward ↓ CV events (P = NS); possible early benefit

Cp indicates C pneumoniae; CV, cardiovascular; CRP, C-reactive protein. Composite CV event reflects a combination of at least 3 of the following clinical end points: fatal/nonfatal MI, unstable angina, unplanned revascularization, stroke, or all-cause mortality. All of these studies included cardiovascular death as an end point.

The decrease in CV events was only statistically significant at 1 month, although the difference persisted at 6 months.

Table 3.

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Trial Population Size Follow-up Regimen (vs Placebo) End Points
ACES46 Stable CAD patients 4000 4 y Azithromycin 600 mg every wk × 1 y Composite CV events
MARBLE Patients awaiting CABG 1200 Azithromycin Composite CV events
PROVE-IT46 Acute coronary syndrome 4000 2 y Gatifloxacin ± statin Composite CV events
ANTIBIO Acute MI 872 Roxithromycin Composite CV events

CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; ACES, Azithromycin and Coronary Events; MARBLW, Might Azithromycin Reduce Bypass List Events; PROVE-IT, Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy; ANTIBIO, Antibiotic Therapy After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Gupta et al38 published the first randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled secondary prevention trial of 60 stable post-MI male patients known to be seropositive for C pneumoniae. Subjects were randomized to receive a 3- to 6-day course of azithromycin or placebo. After 18 months of follow-up, the event rate was 8% in the treatment group compared with 28% in the placebo group, a statistically significant reduction, albeit with very small numbers.

The Roxithromycin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Syndromes (ROXIS) study39 was a secondary prevention trial of 202 patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction(NQWMI) randomized to receive a 1-month course of roxithromycin or placebo. Of note, C pneumoniae seropositivity was not used as an entry criterion. There was a statistically significant reduction in recurrent cardiovascular events with 2% of the treatment group compared with 9% of the placebo arm having the triple end point of recurrent angina, AMI, or death. After 6 months of follow-up, this difference persisted but was no longer statistically significant.

The Azithromycin in Coronary Artery Disease: Elimination of Myocardial Infection with Chlamydia (ACADEMIC) trial39 was a secondary prevention trial of 302 coronary patients who were seropositive for C pneumoniae. They were randomized to receive a 3-month course of azithromycin or placebo. After 6 months of follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in C-reactive protein and IL-6 compared with placebo; however, no difference in clinical events (fatal/nonfatal MI, unstable angina, unplanned coronary revascularization, stroke) or antibody titers was observed between the 2 groups. After 2 years of follow-up, there continued to be no difference in clinical end points.

The Clarithmyocin in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Finland (CLARIFY) study41 demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with unstable angina or NQWMI after a 3-month treatment period with clarithromycin initiated at the time of presentation, compared with placebo. Over a median period of 555 days, treated patients had a relative risk ratio of 0.49 for a cardiovascular event.

The Weekly Intervention with Zithromax for Atherosclerosis and its Related Disorders (WIZARD) trial42 is the largest clinical trial published to date. It included 3300 patients with a prior MI and positive serologies who were randomized to receive placebo or azithromycin 600 mg 4 times a day for the first 3 days followed by 600 mg once a week for 11 weeks. Although there was a nonsignificant early treatment benefit, this was not sustained throughout the entire 3-year follow-up period.

Brassard et al43 conducted a nested case-control study of 30 000 subjects status post-MI and noted a nonstatistically significant reduction in risk of acute MI in patients receiving a prescription for antichlamydial antibiotics in the preceding 3 months. The Intraconary Stenting and Antibiotic Regimen (ISAR-3) study44 of poststent patients found that although there was no overall difference in the rate of angiographic restenosis in patients receiving roxithromycin compared with placebo, those patients with high C pneumoniae antibody titers who received the antibiotic had a significantly lower restenosis rate compared with those who did not.

The results of these clinical trials with respect to the potential role of antibiotics in the management of coronary artery disease are inconclusive. These studies varied in a number of ways, including the patient population selected, C pneumoniae seropositivity, the duration of follow-up, the antibiotic used, dosage, and the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients with stable coronary disease differ from those presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. Patients with unstable plaque may have a higher infective burden or be more likely to have active infection and thus may benefit more directly from antibiotic therapy. Two of the published trials, ROXIS and CLARIFY, involved patients with unstable angina or NQWMI, and both demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events with treatment. The ACADEMIC and WIZARD trials, conducted in patients with relatively stable coronary disease, yielded negative results. One potential explanation for this disparity is that the organism may remain in its inactive nonreplicating form in stable atherosclerotic plaque, making it less susceptible to the effects of antibiotics.

Areas of Uncertainty and Future Directions

Does C pneumoniae play a role in coronary artery disease? Although the 4 traditional criteria in Koch postulates are not entirely fulfilled, there is evidence to suggest that the organism may be more than simply an innocent bystander.

Seroepidemiological data have provided modest support for an association between atherosclerosis and C pneumoniae, although more recent prospective studies have not been as convincing. When interpreting these findings as well as the findings of clinical trials, it is important to consider the limitations of current serological tests, which are unable to distinguish between previous exposure and active persistent endovascular infection. Several studies have shown that positive serology does not necessarily correlate with presence of the organism in atheroma.20 Although serologies may be used as a screening test, we lack a gold standard that is able to confirm the presence of active infection in the vascular wall. In the same way that cholesterol levels can be accurately tested to evaluate for hyperlipidemia as a potential modifiable risk factor, we need a sensitive and standardized means of identifying active endovascular infection. PCR to detect C pneumoniae DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells may be a better marker of persistent infection and measure of the effect of antichlamydial therapy.20, 45

Although the organism is not present in all atheromatous plaque (Koch's first postulate), histopathological data suggest that the organism has a tropism for atherosclerotic vascular tissues, with viable organism being cultured from these tissues (Koch's second postulate). However, the difficulty in culturing the organism in vitro and, as described above, the absence of a surrogate marker of active infection pose a diagnostic challenge to determine the presence of an active endovascular infection. Data from animal models provide support for Koch's third postulate as inoculation of the organism into a healthy host has been observed to cause atherosclerotic disease or increase the progression of atherosclerotic lesions in those with preexisting disease. In these same animal studies, after inoculation with the organism, the presence of C pneumoniae in the vessel walls has been confirmed (Koch's fourth postulate.)

Because of the limitations of Koch's postulates in determining an association between C pneumoniae and coronary disease, data from clinical trials have become of paramount importance. A positive clinical trial would provide additional evidence in favor of a causal relationship, whereas a negative trial would suggest the opposite. However, results from current antibiotic clinical trials are inconclusive, and the effectiveness of therapy may vary between different subsets of patients as seen in the ROXIS and CLARIFY studies compared with the ACADEMIC and WIZARD trials. Patients who present with acute coronary syndrome may derive more direct benefit from antibiotic therapy than those with stable coronary disease. Active chlamydial infection may be involved in plaque rupture, and antibiotics may be an important initial therapy in those presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the same way that aspirin, antiplatelet agents, β-blockers, and statins are used. The results of the PROVE-IT and ACES trials and other ongoing large-scale clinical trials (Table 3) will be important in clarifying the potential role for antibiotics in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary disease, respectively.46

There are several other important issues raised by these clinical trials. The metabolically inactive, persistent form of the organism may make its eradication difficult, raising the question of the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. A longer duration of therapy may be needed to provide bactericidal effects against the organism. If these trials demonstrate a positive treatment benefit, we will need to weigh these benefits against the risk of increasing antimicrobial resistance. An additional area of uncertainty is the degree to which the anti-inflammatory effects of antibiotics account for any of the benefit seen in cardiovascular outcomes.

Addendum

Since this manuscript was written, the result of the ANTIBIO and PROVE-IT trial have been released. The ANTIBIO study examined over 800 acute MI patients randomized to roxithromycin or placebo for 6 weeks and found no difference in mortality or other secondary end points between the two groups at 12 months. The PROVE-IT study was a trial of over 4000 patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome and did not show any cardiovascular benefit associated with long-term (2 years) treatment with azithromycin. The lack of any benefit seen in these trials suggests that there is currently no role for long term antibiotic treatment (at least with the current antichlamydial therapies available) in the management of coronary artery disease.

References

  • 1.Frothingham C. The relation between acute infectious diseases and arterial lesions. Arch Intern Med. 1911;8:153–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Minick C.R., Fabricant C.G., Fabricant J. Atheroarteriosclerosis induced by infection with a herpesvirus. Am J Pathol. 1979;96:673–706. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grattan M.T., Moreno-Cabral C.E., Starnes V.A. Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with cardiac allograft rejection and atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1989;261:3561–3566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grattan M.T. Accelerated graft atherosclerosis following cardiac transplantation: Clinical perspectives. Clin Cardiol. 1991;14:16–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McDonald K.M., Rector T.S., Braunlin E.A. Association of coronary artery disease in cardiac transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:359–362. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90535-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou Y.F., Leon M.B., Waclawiw M.A. Association between prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of restenosis after coronary atherectomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:624–630. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608293350903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sorlie P.D., Nieto F.J., Adam E. A prospective study of cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus 1, and coronary heart disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2027–2032. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.13.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ridker P.M., Hennekens C.H., Stampfer M.J. Prospective study of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and the risk of future myocardial infarction and stroke. Circulation. 1998;98:2796–2799. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.25.2796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siscovick D.S., Schwartz S.M., Corey L. Chlamydia pneumoniae, herpes simplex virus type 1, and cytomegalovirus, and incident myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease death in older adults: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2000;102:2335–2340. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.19.2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Danesh J., Collins R., Peto R. Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: Is there a link? Lancet. 1997;350:430–436. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03079-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pasceri V., Cammarota G., Patti G. Association of virulent Helicobacter pylori strains with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1998;97:1675–1679. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Espinola-Klein C., Rupprecht H.J., Blankenberg S. Impact of infectious burden on extent and long-term prognosis of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:15–21. doi: 10.1161/hc0102.101362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rupprecht H.J., Blankenberg S., Bickel C. Impact of viral and bacterial infectious burden on long-term prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001;104:25–31. doi: 10.1161/hc2601.091703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kiechl S., Egger G., Mayr M. Chronic infections and the risk of carotid atherosclerosis: Prospective results from a large population study. Circulation. 2001;103:1064–1070. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.8.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuo C.C., Jackson L.A., Campbell L.A. Chlamydia pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:451–461. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.4.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campbell L.A., Kuo C.C., Grayston J.T. Chlamydia pneumoniae and cardiovascular disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:571–579. doi: 10.3201/eid0404.980407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saikku P., Leinonen M., Mattila K. Serologic evidence for an association of a novel Chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1988;2:983–986. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90741-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saikku P., Leinonen M., Tenkanen L. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:273–278. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huittinen T., Leinonen M., Tenkanen L. Synergistic effect of persistent Chlamydia pneumoniae infection, autoimmunity, and inflammation on coronary risk. Circulation. 2003;107:2566–2570. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068338.17948.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boman J., Hammerschlag M.R. Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: Critical assessment of diagnostic methods and relevance to treatment studies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:1–20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.1-20.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kutlin A., Roblin P.M., Hammerschlag M.R. Antibody response to Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in children with respiratory illness. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:720–724. doi: 10.1086/514223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hyman C.L., Roblin P.M., Gaydos C.A. Prevalence of asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carriage of Chlamydia pneumoniae in subjectively healthy adults: Assessment by polymerase chain reaction–enzyme immunoassay and culture. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1174–1178. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.5.1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Danesh J., Whincup P., Walker M. Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG titres and coronary heart disease: Prospective study and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2000;321:208–213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7255.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bloemenkamp D.G., Mali W.P., Visseren F.L. Meta-analysis of sero-epidemiologic studies of the relation between Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: Does design influence results? Am Heart J. 2003;145:409–417. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shor A., Kuo C.C., Patton D.L. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in coronary arterial fatty streaks and atheromatous plaques. S Afr Med J. 1992;82:158–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gibbs R.G., Carey N., Davies A.H. Chlamydia pneumoniae and vascular disease. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1191–1197. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramirez J.A. Isolation of Chlamydia pneumoniae from the coronary artery of a patient with coronary atherosclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:979–982. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maas M., Bartels C., Engel P.M. Endovascular presence of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common phenomenon in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:827–832. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weiss S.M., Roblin P.M., Gaydos C.A. Failure to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae in coronary atheromas of patients undergoing atherectomy. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:957–962. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.4.957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fong I.W., Chiu B., Viira E. Rabbit model for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:48–52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.48-52.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laitinen K., Laurila A., Pyhala L. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection induces inflammatory changes in the aortas of rabbits. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4832–4835. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.11.4832-4835.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moazed T.C., Campbell L.A., Rosenfeld M.E. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:238–241. doi: 10.1086/314855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Muhlstein J.B., Anderson J.L., Hammond E.H. Infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae accelerates the development of atherosclerosis and treatment with azithromycin prevents it in a rabbit model. Circulation. 1998;97:633–636. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.7.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dosquet C., Weill D., Wautier J.L. Cytokines and thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;25:13–19. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199500252-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sakayama K., Masuno H., Okumura H. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppresses synthesis, activity, and secretion of lipoprotein lipase in cultures of human osteosarcoma cell line. Biochem J. 1996;316:813–817. doi: 10.1042/bj3160813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Libby P., Egan D., Skarlatos S. Role of infectious agents in atherosclerosis and restenosis: An assessment of the evidence and need for future research. Circulation. 1997;96:4095–4103. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.11.4095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kol A., Sukhova G.K., Lichtman A.H. Chlamydial heat shock protein 60 localizes in human atheroma and regulates macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase expression. Circulation. 1998;98:300–307. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.4.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gupta S., Leatham E.W., Carrington D. Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies, cardiovascular events, and azithromycin in male survivors of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:404–407. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gurfinkel E., Bozovich G., Beck E. Treatment with the antibiotic roxithromycin in patients with acute non–Q-wave coronary syndromes. The final report of the ROXIS Study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:121–127. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muhlstein J.B., Anderson J.L., Carlquist J.F. Randomized secondary prevention trial of azithromycin in patients with coronary artery disease: Preliminary clinical results of the ACADEMIC study. Circulation. 2000;102:1755–1760. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sinisalo J., Mattila K., Valtonen V. Effect of 3 months of antimicrobial treatment with clarithromycin in acute non–Q-wave coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2002;105:1555–1560. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000012544.07696.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.O'Connor C., Dunne M.W., Pfeffer M.A. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease events. The WIZARD study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1459–1466. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brassard P., Bourgault C., Brophy J. Antibiotics in primary prevention of myocardial infarction in elderly patients with hypertension. Am Heart J. 2003;145:E20. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Neumann F., Kastrati A., Miethke T. Treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection with roxithromycin and effect on neointimal proliferation after coronary stent placement (ISAR-3): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357:2085–2089. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ngeh J., Anand V., Gupta S. Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis—what we know and what we don't. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:2–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gelfand E.V., Cannon C.P. Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: An ACES hypothesis but we need to PROVE IT. Am Heart J. 2004;147:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES