Abstract
Allergic conjunctival diseases (ACDs), are a group of ocular allergies that includes allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis. While a large body of information exist on the pathophysiology of ACDs, this has not yet lead to the development of clear recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis of ACDs or development of conclusive and objective diagnostic tools. Identification of objectively measurable biomarkers that represent the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with ACDs will be an important step towards achieving these aims. This is a comprehensive review of biological markers that have the potential to become ‘biomarker(s)’ for ACDs and aid in the classification, diagnosis and development of new therapeutic strategies for these group of allergic conditions.
Introduction
Allergic conjunctival Diseases (ACDs) are a group of conjunctival inflammatory diseases spanning different classes of hypersensitivity reactions and are accompanied by some subjective and objective symptoms1 and affect approximately 10% to 20% of the US population2. Importantly, ACDs occur as comorbidity of atopic diseases which affects 5% to 20% of the general population and therefore represents a major economic burden worldwide3–5 . The diagnosis of ACDs are based on a combination of clinical history, signs and symptoms and wherever possible, in vivo and in vitro tests to identify specific allergens6. However, there are several complicating factors in the diagnosis of ACDs, the main one being the presence of clinical manifestations that overlap with other nonallergic ocular surface diseases like dry eye disease7, conjunctivitis associated with blepharitis, infections, amongst others8. Consequently, there is a lack of clear recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis of ACDs, which is further compounded by the paucity of accurate and rapid diagnostics tools. Identification of biomarkers that represent molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with ACDs will be an important step towards achieving that. Objectively measurable biomarkers in combination with patient symptoms and currently available measures of signs may produce algorithms for diagnosis as well as provide direction towards developing new diagnostic tools and therapies for ACDs. This review will focus on existing insights into the pathophysiology of ACDs and the current status on potential biomarkers for ACDs.
Classification of ACDs
ACDs are classified into 4 main types based on signs, symptoms and the presence of atopic comorbidities.
1. Allergic conjunctivitis (AC).
This includes seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) where symptoms appear in a seasonal manner and perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC) where symptoms persist throughout the year. This group represents 25% to 50% of all cases of ACDs and is the most common allergic disease of the eye. SAC is associated with hypersensitivity to airborne allergens, such as tree and weed pollens or environmental antigens specific to a certain geographic area. PAC is associated with indoor antigens, such as dust mites, animal dander, and molds. Both SAC and PAC are primarily associated with IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation and consequent release of proinflammatory mediators and recruitment of eosinophils.
2. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC).
AKC is a severe chronic allergic conjunctival disease that requires prompt and effective treatment to prevent permanent vision loss. Complications of atopic keratoconjunctivitis include infectious keratitis, keratoconus, blepharitis, and cataracts. AKC is a comorbidity in 20% to 43% of individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD)4,9. The immunopathology of AKC is complex, with both type I and IV hypersensitivity reactions contributing to the condition.
3. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).
VKC represents 0.5% of allergic ocular disease10 and like AKC, many cases are associated with AD. VKC predominantly affects males, mainly children and young adolescents ages 11 to 13 years. Approximately 50% of patients have a history of atopy, such as AD, asthma and allergic rhinitis. Along with AKC, VKC it is primarily responsible for the blinding corneal complications of ACDs. Like AKC, both type I and IV hypersensitivity reactions contribute to the pathogenesis of VKC, with Th2 lymphocyte activation in association with high eosinophilic infiltration being predominant contributors to the pathophysiology.
4. Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC).
GPC is commonly present in contact lens wearers. Patients with history of atopy are at higher risk for GPC, as well as those exposed to materials such as ocular prostheses and sutures. Protein deposits on contact lenses or prostheses may serve as allergens creating a type I hypersensitivity or type IV hypersensitivity. The main underlying pathophysiology of GPS is Th2 lymphocyte mediated response to the mechanical trauma of the conjunctival epithelium.
Overview of the pathophysiology of ACDs
The conjunctiva is an immunologically primed barrier that consists mainly of an epithelial layer that is populated with goblet cells, lymphocytes and Langerhans cells and a subepithelial layer populated with a rich network of blood vessels, resident antigen presenting cells (APC) like dendritic (DCs) and mast cells11,12. Collectively the components of the conjunctiva are equipped to mount a complex signaling cascade via their expression of toll-like receptors (TLR), histamine, histamine receptors, cytokines, chemokines, matrix metalloproteinases, and adhesion molecules11,13–17. These together are some of the key mediators in the immunopathogenesis of ACDs, which is classically considered to have a sensitization phase, an early phase and a late phase.
Following the initial exposure of allergen specific IgE to conjunctival mast cells, the sensitization phase is initiated. Studies show that the initial breakdown of the epithelial layer cell junctions, mainly mediated by protease-activated receptor-2, exposes the allergens to DCs resulting in the subsequent differentiation of CD4 cells into allergen specific Th2 cells. This leads to the production of IL-4, differentiation of B-cells to plasma cells to produce allergen specific IgE and mast cell activation18,19. Damaged epithelial cells produce IL-33, a potent Th2 cytokine that promotes IgE isotype switch and eosinophil infiltration. A study has shown the expression of IL-33 by epithelial and vascular endothelial cells in ACD patient conjunctival tissues5,20. Additionally , IL-33 is a ligand for suppression of tumorigenity 2L (ST2L), and the ST2L gene has been found to be associated with a number of atopic conditions20. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is another cytokine that is produced by activated conjunctival epithelium through a TLR4-dependent pathway21. TSLP in turn can activate conjunctival DCs to express OX40 ligand and migrate to the regional lymph node to promote Th2 differentiation22,23. Finally, Th2 cells along with conjunctival epithelial cells push conjunctival mast cells into the sensitization phase of allergic conjunctivitis22. While Th2 cells are considered to be the predominant mediators in ocular allergy, evidence exists for the involvement of Th1 and Th17 in severe chronic forms of AKC and VKC24.
The early phase is primarily initiated by re-exposure and binding of allergens to the IgE–FcεRI complex on primed conjunctival mast cells25,26. Mast cell degranulation leads to the release of histamine and neutral proteases like tryptase followed by release of lipid mediators that include prostaglandins and leukotrines. At this point a number of cytokines are produced, with IL-4 being the major one released18,27. Studies have shown higher levels of IL-4 in the tears of patients with AKC, VKC, SAC compared to normal28,29. Released histamine binds with H1 and H4 receptors on conjunctival epithelium, mast cells and Th2 cells to further perpetuate conjunctival inflammation30,31. In this regards histamine H1 receptor antagonists are used for the treatment of SAC and PAC32. Also histamine and tryptase have been specifically shown to be associated with IgE-mediated mast cell activation and degranulation in the early phase of allergic conjunctivitis27.
The late phase involves the downstream effect of mast cell degranulation and the released lipid mediators, including prostaglandins and leukotrienes both of which have been shown to potentiate the histamine-mediated vasodilation of conjunctival blood vessels, one of the major clinical signs of allergic conjunctivitis19. Cytokines and chemokines, including, IL-4, IL-5, IL-8 , IL-13 and CCL17, released from degranulated conjunctival mast cells initiate the recruitment of eosinophils into the late phase. IL-5 in particular has been shown to be important in the recruitment and activation of eosinophils in allergic conjunctivitis (AC), where it is involved in ocular surface remodeling, especially in PAC, AKC and VKC19. A study has shown that concentration of histamine in the tears of ACD patients reportedly increases during the late phase of immediate hypersensitivity33. A study by Enriquez et al have demonstrated increased expression of IL-8 in the conjunctival epithelium of VKC and AKC patients and has been shown to be potent attractor of T-cells, eosinophils and neutrophils34.
Putative Biomarkers for ACD
Studies with patient biological materials including tear, serum and tissue have yielded a number of potential biomarkers. Table 1 summarizes key studies that have aided in highlighting important potential biomarkers and Table 2 is a list of putative ‘biomarkers’ for ACDs that have immerged from these studies.
Table 1.
Summary of key studies providing insights into putative biomarkers for ACDs
| Study | Purpose | Patient | Assay | Results/Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matsuda et al, 2019108 | Gene expression profiles of giant papillae tissues obtained from patients with AKC | n=3 AKC n=3 controls |
RNA sequencing performed with Illumina HiSeq 1500 | High number of immunoglobulin-encoded transcripts -suggesting that local immunoglobulin production is feature of AKC Genes within the S aureus infection pathway, ICAM1, complement-associated transcripts (C1QC, C1QB, and CFI), and formyl peptide receptors (FPR1 and FPR2), known to be associated with process host defense against S aureus Differentially expressed genes included TH2 cytokines, epithelial cell-derived type 2 initiate cytokines, and eosinophil-, macrophage-, and neutrophil-attracting chemokines Signature genes of mast cells (TPSAB1, CPA3, and FCER1A), eosinophils (PRG2, encoding eosinophil major basic protein), T cells(CD4), dendritic cells (ITGAX encoding CD11c), and Langerhans cells (CD207) |
| Shoji et al, 201850 | To evaluate the relationship between clinical severity and tear levels of ECP and CCL23 in patients with chronic ACD | n=21 ACD n=14 controls |
ELIAS for ECP and CCL23 | In chronic ACD patients, tear ECP level significantly correlated with the clinical severity score. Clinical severity scores and tear ECP levels in the CCL23-positive subgroup were significantly higher than those in the CCL23-negative subgroup. |
| Andrade et al, 2018101 | To evaluate Gal-3, a β-galactoside binding protein, as a possible biomarker in ocular allergy | n=29 ACD chronic n=3 controls |
Immunostaining for Gal-3 in impression cytology samples | Higher levels of Gal-3 in ACD chronic vs controls |
| Shoji et al , 201739 | Clinical usefulness of simultaneously determination of tear levels of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 for assessing acute and chronic allergic inflammation in ACDs | n=17 AC n= 6 AKC n=14 VKC n=11 controls |
Magnetic bead assay CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 ELISA for ECP |
Positive rates of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 were higher in patients with AC, AKC, and VKC compared to controls. Levels of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 in patients with AKC and VKC were significantly higher than those in patients with AC. Patients with AKC and VKC showed significant correlation between levels of CCL24/eotaxin-2 and ECP |
| Inada et al, 201756 | This study investigated the histamine H1 and H4 receptors mRNA (H1R and H4R, respectively) expression on the ocular surface of patients with chronic forms of allergic conjunctival diseases in the conjunctiva. | n=7 AKC/VKC stable n=12 AKC/VKC active n=15 control |
Real-time RT-PCR H1R, H4R, and eotaxin-1, −2, and −3 Immunohistochemistry for ECP, eosinophil MBP, eotaxin-2, and H4R |
The number of H4R-positive patients was higher in the active than the stable stage subgroup and control group, whereas no difference was observed for H1R. H1R levels were higher in the active than in the stable stage subgroup, while those of H4R were higher in the active stage subgroup than in the control group. H1R and H4R levels were correlated with eotaxin-2 level. Immunohistochemical analysis, H4R revealed their expression on in conjunctival smears of patients with AKC/VKC. |
| Fujishima et al, 201640 | Tear periostin in patients with SAC, VKC, and AKC and allergic patients without conjunctivitis and compared it with tear IL-13 and serum periostin. Tear periostin in AKC before and after topical treatment with tacrolimus. | n=26 AKC n=4 VKC n=15 SAC n=14 control |
ELISA for periostin and IL-13 | IL-13 elevated in tears of AKC, but not VKC or SAC Periostin levels were high in AKC, VKC and SAC Vs control Periostin and IL-13 levels in the tears of all patients with ocular allergic disease and healthy controls showed significant correlation |
| Dadaci et al, 201570 | To evaluate serum MDA, adjusted IMA, and Mg levels in SAC patients | n=35 SAC n=38 control |
Mg concentrations with Cobas Integra 400 analyzer MDA with thiobarbituric acid IMA binding of exogenous cobalt to albumin for |
Serum MDA and adjusted IMA levels of the subjects with SAC were significantly higher than the control group. There was no significant difference for serum Mg levels between the groups. |
| Leonardi et al 201544 | Measurement of specific IgE in tears using a multiplex allergen microarray | n=10 VKC n=10 control |
Multiplex | Normal subjects resulted negative for the presence of specific IgE both in serum and in tears. VKC, six samples were positive to specific IgE in serum and/or tears. |
| Leonardi et al, 20146 | Analyze peptide profiles in human tears using mass spectrometry to elucidate compositional differences between healthy subjects and patients with VKC. | n=10 VKC n=10 control |
iTRAQ 4-plex | 78 proteins were identified Levels of albumin, transferrin, hemopexin, mammaglobin B, and secretoglobin 1D1 were found significantly higher in VKC compared with normal subjects. |
| Wakamatsu et al, 201245 | Evaluate tear and serum IgE and ECP as severity markers for AKC | n=30 AKC n=10 controls |
ELISA for ECP and IgE | Higher total IgE and ECP levels in AKC tears compared with the control group. Tear ECP levels significantly correlated with fluorescein and conjunctival scores (r=0.70 and 0.62, respectively). Tear IgE had no correlation with clinical signs. Seum IgE and ECP levels were elevated in AKC patients but no correlation with clinical signs. |
| Wakamatsu et al, 2011109 | To examine the clinical efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of tacrolimus eye drops on tear ECP levels in AKC patients | n=9 AKC | ELISA for ECP | Post-treatment tear ECP levels were significantly reduced (195.71±164.46) ng/ml compared to the pre-treatment level (2,680.22±2,342.7 ng/ml. Significant positive correlation between tear ECP with corneal fluorescein staining (r=0.70, p=0.0039). |
| Wakamatsu et al, 201038 | To evaluate the ocular surface lipid oxidative stress status and inflammation in AKC patients and normal subjects | n=14 AKC n=9 controls |
Immunohistochemistry for HEL and 4-HNE in brush cytology samples ELISA for HEL and IL-4,IL-5, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ in tears |
HEL and 4-HNE significantly elevated in AKC patients. Significantly higher levels of HEL IL-4,IL-5, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were detected in tears of AKC compared to controls. Significant linear positive correlation between conjunctival inflammation and epithelial lipid oxidative stress status was observed. |
| Pong et al, 2010110 | Association of hemopexin in tear film in VKC patients | n=29 VKC n=8 control |
ELISA | Hemopexin was elevated in the tear film of patients with VKC. The increased hemopexin concentration in VKC tears was significantly associated with disease severity. |
| Leonardi, 200967 | Multiple mediators and growth factors in tears of VKC patients with active disease | n=24 VKC n=12 control |
stationary phase antibody arrays. | Interleukin-8 signals were highly detected in all VKC IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 detected only in VKC bFGF, HB-EGF, VEGF and HGF detected in 41-87% of VKC MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9 and MMP-10 were highly present in all VKC samples as compared to control |
| Shoji et al, 2009111 | evaluate the in vivo expression of, eotaxin-1, −2, and −3, patients with VKC and in those of healthy individuals. | n=25 VKC n=11 control |
ELISA and RT=PCR for eotaxin-1, −2, and −3 | Expression ratio of eotaxin-1 (P < 0.01) and −2 (P < 0.001) significantly higher in VKC compared to control. In the VKC group, the concentration of eotaxin-2 was higher than eotaxin-1. There was a significant correlation between the concentration of eotaxin-2 and ECP in the VKC group |
| Matsuda, et al, 200919 | To study genetic association between the ST2L gene and atopy by looking at expression of IL-33. | n=6 AKC n=5 conjunctivochalasis n=4 superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis n=2 Mooren Ulcer |
Immunohistochemistry for IL-33 | IL-33 expressed in vascular endothelial cells in the giant papillae and in the control conjunctivae. IL-33 expression was also observed in conjunctival epithelium of the giant papillae but not in the control conjunctivae. |
| Dogru et al, 200897 | Investigate MUC16 and MUC5AC in ocular surface of patients with AKC | n=18 AKC n=14 control |
Immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR for MUC16 and MUC5AC in impression cytology samples | Patient eyes showed positive staining for MUC5AC and MUC16. MUC16 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated and MUC5AC mRNA significant downregulation in eyes of AKC compared to control. |
| Inada et al, 200727 | Variations in total secretory IgA and house dust mite specific IgA antibodies in tears of patients with ACD. | n=13 VKC n=11 AKC n=16 PAC n=21 normal |
ELISA | Total sIgA values were significantly lower in the VKC group than in the control group |
| Shoji et al, 2007112 | Evaluate the significance of soluble IL-6R in tears as a clinical indicator of disease exacerbation in patients with ACD. | n=13 VKC n=13 AKC n=11 GPC n=10 normal |
ELISA | The concentrations of soluble IL-6R in VKC and GPC groups were significantly higher than those in the control group. The concentration of soluble IL-6R and the clinical score of allergic inflammation of the ocular surface were significantly correlated in the VKC group. |
| Soji et al, 200635 | To investigate differences in the cytokine and chemokine profiles of patients with VKC or GPC | n=6 VKC n=5 GPC n=5 normal |
40 marker Antibody array | VKC, eotaxin, IL-11, MCP-1, and M-CSF increased four fold the values to control group, VKC, Eotaxin-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-6sR, IL-7, MIP-1δ,and TIMP-2, increased to eight fold control values GPC, IL-6, M-CSF, and MIG increased to four fold to control group, GPC, eotaxin-2, IL-6sR, IL-11, MIP-1δ,and TIMP-2, increased to eight fold to control values. Increase in IL-6sR compared to controls was statistically significant in both VKC and GPC groups |
| Dogru et al, 200699 | MUC 1, 2 and 4 alterations, tear function and the ocular surface in patients with AKC | n=14 AKC n=11 control |
Immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR for MUC 1, 2 and 4 in impression cytology samples. | Specimens from patient eyes showed positive staining for MUC 1, 2 and 4. MUC 1, 2 and 4 mRNA expressions were significantly higher in eyes with significant epithelial disease compared with eyes with insignificant epithelial disease and eyes of control subjects. |
| Motterle et al, 200673 | Expression of neurotransmitters and neurotransmitter receptors in VKC tissues to evaluate whether neurogenic inflammation plays a role in this ocular atopic-related disorder. | n=8 VKC n=4 control |
Immunohistochemistry for M1, M2, and M3 muscarinic receptors; β1-adrenergic receptor; vasoactive intestinal peptide; nerve growth factor; and protein gene product 9.5. | M1muscarinic receptor, nerve growth factor, and protein gene product 9.5 expression were decreased compared with control subjects. |
| Kitaichi, et al. 2006113 | To Determine the quantity of MIF in regional ocular fluid of ACDs and AD | n=16 AD n=10 ACD n=15 control |
ELISA for MIF | MIF concentration in controls was 0.69+/−0.2 ng/ml Vs 17.87+/−6.3 ng/ml in moderate-to-severe, 0.93+/−0.08 ng/ml in mild atopic dermatitis and 2.76+/−0.86 ng/ml in ACDs |
| Yamagami, et al. 2005114 | To evaluate chemokine receptor genes and their ligand expressions in upper tarsal conjunctival giant papillae of AKC with atopic dermatitis and/or asthma | n=5 AKC n=3 controls |
Gene expression for CXCR4 and CCR4, TARC/CCL17, SDF-1/CXCL12, IL-4 and IL-13 | CXCR4 and CCR4 are the major chemokine receptor genes expressed in the giant papillae of AKC with atopic dermatitis and/or asthma. Giant papillae with high CCR4 gene expression levels showed high IL-4 and IL-13 expression |
| Ebihara et al, 200457 | Levels of mast cell chymase and tryptase activity in the tears of patients with VKC | n=38 VKC n=14 control |
chymase and tryptase enzyme activity | High tryptase and chymase activity in VKC tears compared to control Only chymase activity correlated to clinical signs. |
| Nivenius et al, 200436 | To investigate the possibility that microorganisms may be important in the inflammatory activity in AKC. | n=15 AKC n=12 control |
Bead array for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 | AKC patients showed significantly higher levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 than controls. An association was found between conjunctival signs and the levels of all cytokines except IL-5. |
| Leonardi et al, 2004115 | Measure Th1-type and Th2-type cytokine and chemokine levels in tears of patients with different types of allergic conjunctivitis | n=18 VKC n=12 SAC n=6 AKC n=3 GPC n=14 control |
Multiplexed bead assay IL-;1ß, -2, -4, -5, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, IFNγ, TNF-α, Eotaxin, RANTES and MCP-1 | Controls:low levels of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 and RANTES VKC: significant increase over control of IL-1ß, -2, -4, -5, -6, -10, -12, -13, IFNγ, MCP-1 and eotaxin, SAC: significant increase over control of IL-1ß and IL-2, and AKC of IL-1ß, -6, -8 and MCP-1 AKC: significant increase over control of IL-1ß, -6, -8 and MCP-1 GPC: IL-8 was increased over control, VKC and SAC IL-5 was significantly increased in VKC over all the other groups |
| Leonardi et al, 2003116 | Quantify the presence of TNF-a in tear and serum in ACDs | n=12 control n=12 VKC n=6 SAC |
ELISA | Serum and tear TNF-α levels in VKC were significantly increased compared to control and significantly correlated with the severity of the disease. |
| Leonardi et al, 200364 | To study levels MMP-1 and −9 and TIMP-1 in tears of patients with VKC, with and without severe corneal damage. | n=16 VKC n=10 control |
ELISA MMP-1, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 Activity assay for MMP-1 and MMP-9 |
Levels of MMP-1 and MMP-9 were significantly increased in patients with VKC compared with control subjects (P < 0.001). MMP-1/TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 molar ratios were significantly increased (P < 0.001) in VKC. MMP-1 and MMP-9 activities were significantly increased in VKC tears compared with control samples (P < 0.005). MMP-9 activity correlated significantly with corneal involvement and giant papillae formation. |
| Leonardi, et al, 2003117 | To measure Eotaxin-1 and Eotaxin-2 in tear and mucus of AKC and VKC patients | n=13 VKC n=3 AKC n=6 control |
ELISA Eotaxin-1 and Eotaxin-2 Eosinophil numbers |
High levels of eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 were found in mucus of VKC patients, only eotaxin-2 was increased significantly in tears of VKC and AKC patients compared with those of normal patients. Tear eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 were correlated significantly with the percent of eosinophils. Eotaxin-1 also was correlated significantly with the sum clinical score and corneal involvement in VKC patients |
| Anderson, et al. 200154 | Distribution IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-13 between mast cell subsets in conjunctival biopsy specimens from nor- mal subjects and those with SAC during and outside of the grass pollen season | n=8 symptomatic, SAC in season n=8 non-sympotmatic, SAC out of season n=22 control |
In situ hybridization mRNA IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-13 Immunohistochemistry IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-13 | > 90% of IL-4+ cells were observed to be mast cells in biopsy of all patient groups. Majority of IL-5+, IL-6+, and IL-13+ cells were mast cells for each group. IL-4 preferentially colocalized to the MCTC with MCTC cells comprising 93.3% of cytokine+ mast cells in symptomatic SAC, 89.2% in asymptomatic SAC, and 77.8% in normal subjects. IL-13 appeared to colocalize preferentially to the MCTC phenotype and IL-5 and IL-6 to the MCT phenotype. 75.8% of mast cells in normal subjects, 78.7% in subjects with symptomatic SAC, and 18.7% in subjects with asymptomatic SAC expressed mRNA for IL-4. |
| Uchio et al, 200028 | Interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4 and IL-5 levels in tears in ACDs | n=7 VKC n=28 AKC n=14 AC |
ELISA | IL-4 level in patients with AKC was significantly higher than those in VKC, AC and controls Tear IL-5 levels in VKC and AKC-proliferative, were higher than those in AC and normal controls. |
| Leonardi et al, 200053 | To measure markers of leukocyte activation in serum and tears of patients with ocular inflammatory | n=17 VKC n=7 AKC n=11 SAC n=7 GPC n=13 BKC n=7 BC n=13 controls |
RIA for Neutrophil myeloperoxidase, ECP, eosinophil neurotoxin, and soluble Chemiluminescence assay for IL-2R | In tears of VKC, AKC, SAC, BKC and BC levels of ECP, eosinophil neurotoxin, and IL-2R were significantly increased compared with control subjects with the highest values in VKC. In VKC markers correlateded to the clinical score of the disease. In serum VKC and AKClevels of ECP, eosinophil neurotoxin, and IL-2R were significantly increased compared with control subject but no correlation of marker levels with the severity of ocular symptoms. Neutrophil myeloperoxidase was significantly increased in VKC, AKC, BKC and BC |
| Fukagawa et al, 1999118 | Compare the levels of eotaxin and eosinophils in tears of patients with allergic corneal damage | n=8 controls n=24 AKC (38 eyes in this group 15 eyes with corneal erosion or ulcer (erosion group) 9 eyes with superficial corneal damage (SPK group) 13 eyes with clear corneas (clear group) |
ELISA for Eotaxin | Eotaxin in the erosion group (1475.4 ± 870.5 pg/mL was significantly greater than that from the SPK group (163.4 ± 81.7 pg/mL), the clear group (24.3 ± 12.7 pg/mL), and the nonallergic control subjects (21.7 ± 9.7 pg/mL) Erosion group had greater numbers of eosinophils (42.2 ± 52.2 cells/field, n = 9) compared to SPK group (0.3 ± 0.4 cells/field, n = 5), clear group ( (0 ± 0 cells/field, n = 8) and control group (0 ± 0 cells/field, n = 13) The number of eosinophils correlated with eotaxin concentration |
AKC (atopic keratoconjunctivitis); ACDs(allergic conjunctival disease); ECP (eosinophil cationic protein); CCL (CC chemokine ligand); Gal-3 (galectin-3); ECP (eosinophil cationic protein); TARC (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine); VKC (vernal keratoconjunctivitis);; H4R(histamine H4 receptor); SAC (seasonal allergic conjunctivitis); MCP (mono-cyte chemoattractant protein); M-CSF (macrophage-colony stimulating factor ); MIG (monokine-induced gamma interferon); MDA (serum malondialdehyde), IMA (ischemia modified albumin); HEL (hexanoyl-lysine); 4-HNE (4-hydroxy-2-nonenal); MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor); Atopic Dermatitis (AD); GPC (giant papillary conjunctivitis); TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha); MMP (matrix metalloproteinase); TIMP (tissue inhibitor of MMP); MCTC(tryptase+-chymase+ mast cell phenotype); MCT (tryptase+ mast cell phenotype); BKC (blepharokeratoconjunctivitis); BC(bacterial conjunctivitis); RIA (Radioimmunoassay T-helper (TH); SPK (superficial corneal ); MBP (major basic protein), SDF-1/CXCL12 (stromal cell derived factor-1)
Table 2:
Putative “Biomarkers’ for allergic conjunctival diseases
| Molecules | References |
|---|---|
| Th1/Th17 pathway | |
| IFNγ | 28,36,115 |
| IL-1β | 36,115 |
| IL-6 | 54,115 |
| IL-8 | 115 |
| IL-12 | 115 |
| IL-33 | 19 |
| TNF-α | 36,115,116 |
| Th2 pathway | |
| IL-4 | 28,36,54,114 |
| IL-5 | 36 |
| IL-13 | 40,54,111,114 |
| Eotaxin-1, Eotaxin-2, Eotaxin-3 | 39,115,117,118 |
| TARC | 39,114 |
| Periostin, | 40,119 |
| IgE | 41,42,45 |
| CCL23 | 50 |
| Eosinophil activity marker | |
| ECP | 32,45,50,53,109,111 |
| Eosinophil neurotoxin | 120 |
| Eosinophil granule major basic protein (MBP) | 62 |
| Mast cell mediator | |
| Histamine | 53,117,121 |
| Tryptase and chymase | 53,57,58 |
| LTC4, LTB4 | 59 |
| H1 and H4 receptors | 56 |
| Neutrophil activity marker | |
| Neutrophil elastase, Neutrophil myeloperoxidase | 53 |
| PAI-1 | 7 |
| Proteases and their inhibitors | |
| MMP-1, MMP-9 | 64 |
| TIMP-2 | 35,64 |
| PAI-1 | 7 |
| Oxidative stress | |
| MDA | 70 |
| 4-HNE, HEL | 38,70 |
| Neuromediators | |
| CGRP, VIP, SP | 6,73 |
| M1muscarinic receptor, NGF, and protein gene product 9.5 | 73 |
| Others | |
| MUC 1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC16, MUC5AC | 97,99 |
| MIF | 113 |
| Gal-3 | 101 |
| Hemopexin | 110 |
TARC (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine); ECP (eosinophil cationic protein); PAI-1(plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) AKC (atopic keratoconjunctivitis); ECP (eosinophil cationic protein); CCL (CC chemokine ligand); Gal-3 (galectin-3); ECP (eosinophil cationic protein); TARC (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine); H4R(histamine H4 receptor); MCP (mono-cyte chemoattractant protein); M-CSF (macrophage-colony stimulating factor ); MIG (monokine-induced gamma interferon); MDA (serum malondialdehyde), IMA (ischemia modified albumin); HEL (hexanoyl-lysine); 4-HNE (4-hydroxy-2-nonenal); MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor); Atopic Dermatitis (AD); GPC (giant papillary conjunctivitis); TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha); MMP (matrix metalloproteinase); TIMP (tissue inhibitor of MMP); MCTC(tryptase+-chymase+ mast cell phenotype); MCT (tryptase+ mast cell phenotype); T-helper (TH); MBP (major basic protein), SDF-1/CXCL12 (stromal cell derived factor-1)
(A). Cytokines and Chemokine of the TH1, TH2 and TH17 pathway:
Using ELISA, multiplex bead assay systems, protein arrays and proteomics a number of cytokines and chemokines involved in TH1, TH2 and TH17 immune pathways have been demonstrated in biological samples from ACD patients. Sack et al35, in an early study, looked at the presence of GM-CSF, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, INF-γ, MCP-1/CCL2 and TNF-α and showed detectable levels of most of these proteins in tears from allergic patients35. In a 40 molecule array study by Soji et al36, expression of eotaxin-1, eotaxin-2, IL-11, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF),IL-4, IL-6, IL-6sR, IL-7, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1δ and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-2 were increased more than 4 fold in VKC patient tears as compared to normal. In patients with GPC, IL-6, M-CSF, and monokine-induced gamma interferon6, eotaxin-2, IL-6sR, IL-11, MIP-1δ,and TIMP-2, were increased as compared to control values36. Another study found that tear IL-4 levels in AKC patients were significantly higher than those in VKC, AC and controls. Further the IL-4 tear levels differed significantly in AKC patients with proliferative lesions versus VKC patients. Also, tear IL-5 levels in patients with disease associated with proliferative lesions were found to be higher than those in AC and normal controls29. Nivenius et al37 have demonstrated the presence of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 in tears from AKC patients. Leonardi et al38, in a comparison of tear cytokine levels between VKC, AKC, PAC and SAC, found significant increase in IL-1β, IL-2, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12, IL-13 and MCP-1/CCL2 in all groups compared to normal. Further, IL-4, IFN-γ and IL-10 were elevated in SAC and VKC, while eotaxin-1/CCL11 and TNF-α were only increased in VKC patient group. Significant differences in expression of IL-5, RANTES/CCL5 and eotaxin-1/CCL11 in VKC patients, compared to SAC patients was also observed38. In another study, IL-4, IL-5, and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the eyes of patients with AKC compared with the eyes of healthy control39. A recent study40 has investigated the clinical usefulness of simultaneous assessment of tear levels of CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17)/thymus, activation regulated chemokine (TARC), CCL24/eotaxin-2, and interleukin-16 (IL-16) for determining differences in ACDs. They found that tear positive rates of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 were higher in patients with AC, AKC, and VKC compared with controls. Tear levels of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 in patients with AKC and VKC were significantly higher than those in patients with AC. Moreover, tear levels of IL-16 decreased in patients with AC showing improvement of their clinical score following treatment for 7 days with epinastine ophthalmic solution as compared with levels at baseline. In patients with AKC and VKC, a significant correlation was observed between the tear levels of CCL24/eotaxin-2 and ECP40. The conclusion was that simultaneous measurement of the tear levels of CCL17/TARC, CCL24/eotaxin-2, and IL-16 may be a useful test for assessing acute verses chronic allergic inflammation in ACDs40. Another recent study showed higher levels of IL-13 in tears of AKC, but not VKC or SAC, while periostin levels were high in AKC, VKC and SAC compared to control41. Further, periostin and IL-13 levels in tears of ACD patients showed significant correlation with each other41. Taken together these studies have identified a number of cytokines and chemokines with the potential to serve as biomarkers, especially those that may help distinguish different types of ACDs.
(B). IgE:
IgE is important in the immunopathology of atopic diseases, and is therefore considered as a constitutional marker; both serum and tear IgE levels are routinely measured in the clinic42. Using an immunosorbent method, tear IgE concentrations have been shown to be significantly increased in VKC, SAC and PAC compared to normal subjects43. A study has also shown that IgE levels in tear and serum correlate to each other in VKC, AKC and SAC patients44. More recently, using a multiplex specific microarray technique for direct measurement of IgE, Leonardi et al have shown the presence of allergen-specific IgE antibodies in tears from active VKC patients45. In another study, tear and serum IgE along with eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were measured to determine their use as severity biomarkers for AKC. Higher levels of total IgE and ECP were detected in AKC tears compared with the control group. While tear ECP levels showed significant correlations with fluorescein staining and oedema scores, tear IgE levels showed no correlation to clinical signs. Serum IgE and ECP levels were elevated in AKC patients but did not show any correlation with clinical signs46. While the technology for measuring IgE in an objective and reproducible manner is already available, the studies indicate that its utility as a biomarker for ACDs is inconclusive.
(C). Eosinophil activity markers:
Eosinophils are major constituents of the allergic immune response and therefore proteins associated with eosinophil activity have the potential to be biomarker for ACDs. As such, the presence of ECP and eosinophil neurotoxin (EPX/EDN) in patient biological material is considered a sign of eosinophil activation47,48. Tear ECP levels have been linked to the severity of eosinophilic inflammation in patients with ACD33,46,49. It has also been shown that immunosuppressant ophthalmic solutions reduce tear ECP levels50. In a study looking at IgE and ECP in tears and serum showed that only tear ECP significantly correlated with patient signs including fluorescein staining, conjunctival injection and oedema scores. This indicated that tear ECP, in contrast to tear and serum IgE and serum ECP, was a good marker to delineate the severity of ocular surface disease in AKC and may therefore be useful in clinical trials and follow-up46. In a recent study with chronic ACD patients, tear ECP grade was shown to significantly correlate with clinical severity score. Further clinical severity scores and tear ECP grades in CCL23-positive subgroup among the patients studied was significantly higher than those in CCL23-negative subgroup51. CCL23 is a member of the CC chemokine family and interacts with the CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1)52. CCL23 expression has been observed with eosinophils in addition to monocytes and dendritic cells53. In a study with patients with SAC, VKC, AKC and bacterial conjunctivitis, both ECP and EPX/EDN were significantly increased in both serum and tears further underlining the role of eosinophils in ACDs54. These studies indicate that ECP may have potential as a biomarker to monitor efficacy of therapeutic agents.
(D). Mast cell derived mediators:
An increase in the number of mast cells in the human conjunctiva is one of the earliest events in the immunopathology of allergy55. Consequently, the most common mediator of early phase of hypersensitivity is the histamine released from degranulated mast cells and is therefore a target for the management of a number of allergic diseases56. The concentration of histamine produced by basophils in the tears of ACD patients reportedly increases during the late phase of immediate hypersensitivity33. A number of agonists for H1, one of the receptors for histamine, are used for the management of SAC and PAC32. A recent study57 investigating the potential of histamine receptors as biomarkers for ACDs, looked at the expression of H1 and H4 receptors mRNA (H1R and H4R, respectively) on the ocular surface of patients with AKC/VKC. They found that the number of H4R-mRNA positive patients was higher in patients with active stage AKC/VKC than in patients with the stable stage AKC/VKC and control group, whereas no difference was observed for H1R mRNA levels. H1R mRNA levels were also higher in the active stage AKC/VKC than in the stable stage AKC/VKC subgroup, while H4R mRNA was higher in the active stage subgroup than in the control group. H1R and H4R mRNA levels also correlated with eotaxin-2 mRNA levels57.
In human there are two mast cell subtypes, mast cell T (MCT) and mast cell TC (MCTC) that can be differentiated on the basis of the neutral proteases they produced. MCT subtype express tryptase, while the MCTC subtype expresses both tryptase and chymase. On the basis of this difference, Ebihara et al58 have showed that the levels of tryptase and chymase are increased in VKC patient tears, though only chymase levels show correlation with clinical signs58. Another study has also shown increased levels of tryptase in tears of VKC patients and a decrease in levels following treatment with topical 4% disodium cromoglycate and 0.1% fluorometholone eyedrops59. Mast cells also produce cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT), LTB4 and LTC4 which have been shown in tears of contact lens associated inflammation and ocular prosthesis associated GPC60.
(E). Neutrophil activity marker:
Prominent roles for neutrophils in ocular surface diseases like dry eye disease is increasingly being recognized61,62. Evidence for involvement of neutrophils in ACDs comes from some studies that demonstrated an increase in neutrophil myeloperoxidase in VKC and AKC patient tears as compared to normal54. A study by Trocme et al63 shows the presence of extracellular deposition of neutrophil elastase (NE) in conjunctival specimen from patient with VKC and AKC. Notably, when the levels of NE were compared in the same patients with the presence of eosinophil granule major basic protein (MBP), AKC patients had higher levels of NE as compared to MBP while the reverse was true for VKC patient63. It remains to be seen if neutrophil related markers have the potential to serve as biomarkers for ACDs.
(F). Proteases and their inhibitors:
The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) enzymes are responsible for corneal collagen degradation and inhibited by tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP) enzymes. A study looking at MMP-1, mainly responsible for tissue remodeling, MMP-9, implicated as an inflammatory mediator in ocular surface disease64, and TIMP-1 showed that both MMP-1 and MMP-9 are increased in tears of VKC patients. Further, the MMP-1/TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 molar ratios are significantly increased in VKC and MMP-9 activity correlates significantly with some patient signs65. A similar observation of higher MMP-1 and MMP-9 in tears of VCK patients was observed in a study by Ghavami et al66. They also showed that α−1 Antitrypsin (AAT), a serine protease inhibitor, activity was lower in tears from AKC patients. Another study analyzing tears from VKC found MMP-2 and MMP-9 to be present in all patient samples67. It has also been shown that (MMP)-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-10, MMP-13, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 are present in tears from VKC patients while absent in normal tears68. Plasminogen activators, a group of serine proteases, have important roles in facilitating the migration of inflammatory cell, tissue remodeling and cell adhesion among others69. A study looking at the presence of urokinase-type (uPA) and tissue type (tPA) plasminogen activators found that these two proteins were highly expressed in conjunctival tissue of VKC patients as compared to normal individuals7.
(G). Oxidative stress markers:
Oxidative stress is considered a key event in the pathophysiology of various diseases including allergies70. End products generated by modification of lipids, proteins, and DNA by oxidants are used as markers of oxidative stress and include products of lipid peroxidation like hexanoyl-lysine (HEL) 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA) and products of protein modification like ischemia modified albumin (IMA). A recent study by Dadaci et al71 has shown that serum levels of MDA and IMA is higher in SAG patients as compared to control. Similarly, another study has shown that the levels of HEL and 4-HNE are significantly higher in AKC conjunctival cell samples. Further the levels of HEL and 4-HNE correlated positively with levels of IL-5 and TNF-α39. Recent studies with other ocular surface diseases like dry eye disease have also demonstrated elevated levels of HEL, MDA and 4-HNE in patient tears along with positive correlation with a number of patient signs72. While more studies are needed with patients from all ACDs groups to determine the validity of oxidative stress markers as biomarkers, on a technical level they may present a challenge due their very short half-lives71.
(H). Neuro-mediators:
Burning and stinging are key symptoms that characterizes ACDs and are attributed to chronic neuropathic pain. There is increasing evidence that neurogenic mechanisms may have a significant role in allergic inflammation73. A study looking at the presence of M1, M2, and M3 cholinergic muscarinic receptors, β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and nerve growth factor (NGF) in the conjunctival cells found that in VKC patients the level of M1muscarinic receptor and NGF was reduced whereas neurotransmitter receptors and VIP was increased74. Sacchetti et al75 have shown that following conjunctival allergen provocation test, tear levels of substance P, CGRP and VIP is significantly increased in allergic patients compared to baseline. Another study has shown that levels of Substance P (SP) is high in SAC and VKC compared to normal76, while another study has shown increased levels of NGF and SP in plasma from AKC and VKC as compared to matched controls77. A better understanding of the ocular surface neuro-immune cross-talk may lead to newer insights into the pathophysiology of chronic neuropathic pain, a hallmark of a number or ocular surface diseases, and perhaps identified biomarkers related to chronic neuropathic pain.
(I). Cell markers.
Evaluation of cell surface markers of inflammation and immune cell phenotypes and their proportions in conjunctival cell preparations are being used to monitor the efficacy of treatment for dry eye disease and other ocular conditions64,78. The cellular constitution of the tear film has been investigated in patients with ACDs for the presence of neutrophils, eosinophils and lymphocytes79. Another study has mapped the cellular profiles of secondary immediate, late and delayed conjunctival responses in the tears induced by a nasal provocation test with allergen80. A study has shown that percentages of T cells, activated B cells, and Th1/Th2 cell ratios are higher in tears of patients with AKC than in controls81,82. The presence of Th2 lymphocytes in tear fluid of patients with VKC have also been demonstrate83.
(f). Others:
Periostin a key mediator in allergic inflammation84, is largely produced by epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells in response to IL-4 or IL-13 and has important roles in wound repair85,86,87–89. Periostin overexpression has been shown to plays critical roles in allergic inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD), and bronchial asthma to name a few90,91. Periostin is considered a strong potential biomarker in allergic diseases as studies have shown that serum periostin levels are elevated in patients with bronchial asthma and AD91–93. Measures of serum periostin levels have been used to predict the efficacy of anti–IL-13 antibodies or anti-IgE antibodies therapy94,95(Corren 2011; Kanemitsu 2013). A recent study by Fujishima et al41, has shown that tears from patients with ACDs showed significantly higher periostin levels as compared to tears from allergic patients without conjunctivitis. Further, tear periostin level was shown to be associated with serious comorbidities such as corneal damage in AKC. This study also showed that following topical tacrolimus treatment, tear periostin decreased in most patients with AKC and was associated with clinical improvement.
Mucins are glycoproteins present on the ocular surface. Besides functioning as a lubricant with protective functions96, there is evidence that mucins also play important roles in immune regulation. Mucins MUC1, MUC4, MUC16, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6, and MUC7 are present in the lacrimal glands97. Patients with AKC have been shown to have decreased levels of the goblet cell-specific mucin MUC5AC98–100 , with concomitant increase in the expression of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC4100. Anti-inflammatory treatment of VKC patients has been shown to result in a decrease in the levels of MUC5AC levels on the conjunctival surface and in tears28,101
Recently a role for galectin-3 (Gal-3), a β-galactoside binding protein, as a possible biomarker in ocular allergy has been demonstrated. Conjunctival impression cytology specimens from control and VKC patients showed increased levels of Gal-3. The protein was also increased in murine model of AC. Interestingly the influx of eosinophils, CD4+ expression, levels of eotaxin, IL-4, IL-13 and interferon-γ in the tears of Gal-3−/− animals with AC was several fold higher than its wild type countertype102.
Global protein “expression profiling” using proteomics is an approach that is currently being used to study a number of diseases including ocular surface diseses103. This approach has the potential to help identify putative ‘markers’, that can be further developed as biomarkers. Using iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) Leonardi et al6 have analyzed quantitative and qualitative proteomic profiles of tears from VKC patients and healthy subjects. They identified 78 proteins differentially expressed in VKC tears. Levels of albumin, transferrin, hemopexin, mammaglobin B, and secretoglobin 1D1 were found significantly higher in VKC compared with normal subjects and of these albumin, transferrin, and hemopexin levels were 10–100 times higher than in normal tears6
AKC as a complication of anti-IL-4 and IL-13 therapy for AD
AD, also known as atopic eczema, is the most common inflammatory skin disorder in the world, with a world prevalence of 15–20%104. AD is a significant cause of ocular morbidity occurring in 20% to 43% of patients3–5 and AKC is the most severe ocular complication associated with AD. Dupilumab a monoclonal antibody approved in the US and the EU is being currently used extensively for the treatment of atopic dermatitis105. The mode of action includes binding to the common α chain of the IL-4/IL-13 receptor which results in the inhibition of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathways. These signaling pathways have been shown to be involved in B cell differentiation and IgE production, activation of the Th2-dominant immune response and downregulation of filaggrin, a filament-associated protein that binds to keratin fibers in epithelial cells, with subsequent impairment of the skin’s barrier function and the pathophysiology of AD106. A number of recently published reports have shown a higher incidence of AKC in patients receiving dupilumab. The cause of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis as well as the relationship between its various pathogenetic mechanisms are currently unclear. One of the hypotheses speculate that inhibition of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathways leads to a deviation in the OX40L/OX40 signaling pathway which has shown has to be important in the pathogenesis of atopic keratoconjunctivitis107 and another proposes a transient dupilumab-induced increase in eosinophils, key cells in the pathophysiology of AKC108. Studies investigating AKC on a background of IL-4/IL-13 suppression for AD provides a unique opportunity for novel insights into the pathophysiology of AKC in specific and ACDs in general.
Conclusion
Studies to date have added to the extensive database on the biological processes associated with ACDs and provided critical insights into the pathophysiology of ACDs. Based on these studies a number of strong potential ‘biomarker’ candidates have emerged. However, a number of important aspects have to be addressed before one or combinations thereof of these potential ‘biomarker(s)’ meets the definition of ‘a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or biological responses to a therapeutic intervention’. These includes studies with larger patient cohorts, demonstration of reproducibility of methodology and data obtained, establishing the use of the biomarker, i.e., for diagnosis, establishing severity, assessing change, clinical trial surrogate endpoint and ease of use in a clinical setting. It is hoped that studies with larger patient cohorts that also combine the ‘omics’ approach for wider information will continue to add to our understanding of ACDs and address the important criteria needed to validate ‘biomarker’ candidates for diagnosis, management and assessment of therapeutic effect.
Support:
Grants U10EY022881 and U10EY022879 from the National Eye Institute and supplemental funding from the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Disclosure. Neeta Roy: MC2 Therapeutics (F); Mitotech (F) | Penny Asbell: Compounded Solutions in Pharmacy (F); Immco Diagnostics Inc. (F); Mitotech (F); Novartis (C, F, R); Nutrilite Health Institute (F); Santen (R); ScientiaCME (C, R); Shire (C, R); TearScience (F); WebMd (C); MC2 Therapeutics (F); OCULUS Inc. (F); RPS Diagnostics, Inc. (F); TearLab Corporation (F). All other authors: None.
Reference
- 1.Takamura E, Uchio E, Ebihara N, et al. Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2017. Allergol Int 2017;66:220–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miraldi Utz V, Kaufman AR. Allergic eye disease. Pediatr Clin North Am 2014;61:607–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bielory B, Bielory L. Atopic dermatitis and keratoconjunctivitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2010;30:323–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dogru M, Nakagawa N, Tetsumoto K, Katakami C, Yamamoto M. Ocular surface disease in atopic dermatitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999;43:53–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guglielmetti S, Dart JK, Calder V. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;10:478–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leonardi A, Palmigiano A, Mazzola EA, et al. Identification of human tear fluid biomarkers in vernal keratoconjunctivitis using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. Allergy 2014;69:254–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leonardi A, Brun P, Sartori MT, et al. Urokinase plasminogen activator, uPa receptor, and its inhibitor in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1364–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leonardi A, Bogacka E, Fauquert JL, et al. Ocular allergy: recognizing and diagnosing hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface. Allergy 2012;67:1327–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hogan MJ. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1952;50:265–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lambiase A, Minchiotti S, Leonardi A, et al. Prospective, multicenter demographic and epidemiological study on vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a glimpse of ocular surface in Italian population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:38–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Galicia-Carreon J, Santacruz C, Hong E, Jimenez-Martinez MC. The ocular surface: from physiology to the ocular allergic diseases. Rev Alerg Mex 2013;60:172–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Forrester JV, Xu H, Kuffova L, Dick AD, McMenamin PG. Dendritic cell physiology and function in the eye. Immunol Rev 2010;234:282–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Criado PR, Criado RF, Maruta CW, Machado Filho C. Histamine, histamine receptors and antihistamines: new concepts. An Bras Dermatol 2010;85:195–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Damaj BB, Becerra CB, Esber HJ, Wen Y, Maghazachi AA. Functional expression of H4 histamine receptor in human natural killer cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells. J Immunol 2007;179:7907–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonini S, Micera A, Iovieno A, Lambiase A, Bonini S. Expression of Toll-like receptors in healthy and allergic conjunctiva. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1528; discussion 48–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fukuda K, Kumagai N, Fujitsu Y, Nishida T. Fibroblasts as local immune modulators in ocular allergic disease. Allergol Int 2006;55:121–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumagai N, Fukuda K, Fujitsu Y, Yamamoto K, Nishida T. Role of structural cells of the cornea and conjunctiva in the pathogenesis of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:165–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Butrus S, Portela R. Ocular allergy: diagnosis and treatment. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2005;18:485–92, v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Irkec MT, Bozkurt B. Molecular immunology of allergic conjunctivitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;12:534–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsuda A, Okayama Y, Terai N, et al. The role of interleukin-33 in chronic allergic conjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4646–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li DQ, Zhang L, Pflugfelder SC, et al. Short ragweed pollen triggers allergic inflammation through Toll-like receptor 4-dependent thymic stromal lymphopoietin/OX40 ligand/OX40 signaling pathways. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:1318–25 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takai T. TSLP expression: cellular sources, triggers, and regulatory mechanisms. Allergol Int 2012;61:3–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zheng X, Ma P, de Paiva CS, et al. TSLP and downstream molecules in experimental mouse allergic conjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3076–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reyes NJ, Saban DR. T helper subsets in allergic eye disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;14:477–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Broide DH. Immunomodulation of allergic disease. Annu Rev Med 2009;60:279–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leonardi A, Di Stefano A, Vicari C, Motterle L, Brun P. Histamine H4 receptors in normal conjunctiva and in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy 2011;66:1360–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leonardi A. Allergy and allergic mediators in tears. Exp Eye Res 2013;117:106–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Y, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, et al. The differences of tear function and ocular surface findings in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy 2007;62:917–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Uchio E, Ono SY, Ikezawa Z, Ohno S. Tear levels of interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL) −2, IL-4 and IL-5 in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis and allergic conjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:103–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marson CM. Targeting the histamine H4 receptor. Chem Rev 2011;111:7121–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ohbayashi M, Manzouri B, Morohoshi K, Fukuda K, Ono SJ. The role of histamine in ocular allergy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010;709:43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.del Cuvillo A, Sastre J, Montoro J, et al. Allergic conjunctivitis and H1 antihistamines. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2009;19 Suppl 1:11–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Montan PG, van Hage-Hamsten M. Eosinophil cationic protein in tears in allergic conjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:556–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Enriquez-de-Salamanca A, Calder V, Gao J, et al. Cytokine responses by conjunctival epithelial cells: an in vitro model of ocular inflammation. Cytokine 2008;44:160–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sack R, Conradi L, Beaton A, Sathe S, McNamara N, Leonardi A. Antibody array characterization of inflammatory mediators in allergic and normal tears in the open and closed eye environments. Exp Eye Res 2007;85:528–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shoji J, Inada N, Sawa M. Antibody array-generated cytokine profiles of tears of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis or giant papillary conjunctivitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nivenius E, Montan PG, Chryssanthou E, Jung K, van Hage-Hamsten M, van der Ploeg I. No apparent association between periocular and ocular microcolonization and the degree of inflammation in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:725–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Leonardi A, Curnow SJ, Zhan H, Calder VL. Multiple cytokines in human tear specimens in seasonal and chronic allergic eye disease and in conjunctival fibroblast cultures. Clin Exp Allergy 2006;36:777–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wakamatsu TH, Dogru M, Ayako I, et al. Evaluation of lipid oxidative stress status and inflammation in atopic ocular surface disease. Mol Vis 2010;16:2465–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shoji J, Aso H, Inada N. Clinical Usefulness of Simultaneous Measurement of the Tear Levels of CCL17, CCL24, and IL-16 for the Biomarkers of Allergic Conjunctival Disorders. Curr Eye Res 2017;42:677–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fujishima H, Okada N, Matsumoto K, et al. The usefulness of measuring tear periostin for the diagnosis and management of ocular allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;138:459–67 e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mimura T, Usui T, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Amano S. Relation between total tear IgE and severity of acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:864–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nomura K, Takamura E. Tear IgE concentrations in allergic conjunctivitis. Eye (Lond) 1998;12 (Pt 2):296–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Inada N, Shoji J, Kato H, Kiely S, Mulyanto, Sawa M. Clinical evaluation of total IgE in tears of patients with allergic conjunctivitis disease using a novel application of the immunochromatography method. Allergol Int 2009;58:585–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Leonardi A, Borghesan F, Faggian D, Plebani M. Microarray-based IgE detection in tears of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015;26:641–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wakamatsu TH, Satake Y, Igarashi A, et al. IgE and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) as markers of severity in the diagnosis of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:581–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Venge P, Bystrom J, Carlson M, et al. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP): molecular and biological properties and the use of ECP as a marker of eosinophil activation in disease. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:1172–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Acharya KR, Ackerman SJ. Eosinophil granule proteins: form and function. J Biol Chem 2014;289:17406–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shoji J, Kitazawa M, Inada N, et al. Efficacy of tear eosinophil cationic protein level measurement using filter paper for diagnosing allergic conjunctival disorders. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:64–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Leonardi A, Borghesan F, Faggian D, Secchi A, Plebani M. Eosinophil cationic protein in tears of normal subjects and patients affected by vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy 1995;50:610–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shoji M, Shoji J, Inada N. Clinical Severity and Tear Biomarkers, Eosinophil Cationic Protein and CCL23, in Chronic Allergic Conjunctival Diseases. Semin Ophthalmol 2018;33:325–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Patel VP, Kreider BL, Li Y, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of two novel human C-C chemokines as inhibitors of two distinct classes of myeloid progenitors. J Exp Med 1997;185:1163–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matsumoto K, Fukuda S, Hashimoto N, Saito H. Human eosinophils produce and release a novel chemokine, CCL23, in vitro. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;155 Suppl 1:34–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Leonardi A, Borghesan F, Faggian D, Depaoli M, Secchi AG, Plebani M. Tear and serum soluble leukocyte activation markers in conjunctival allergic diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:151–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Anderson DF, Zhang S, Bradding P, McGill JI, Holgate ST, Roche WR. The relative contribution of mast cell subsets to conjunctival TH2-like cytokines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:995–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thangam EB, Jemima EA, Singh H, et al. The Role of Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Mast Cell-Mediated Allergy and Inflammation: The Hunt for New Therapeutic Targets. Front Immunol 2018;9:1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Inada N, Shoji J, Shiraki Y, Aso H, Yamagami S. Histamine H1 and H4 receptor expression on the ocular surface of patients with chronic allergic conjunctival diseases. Allergol Int 2017;66:586–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ebihara N, Funaki T, Takai S, Miyazaki M, Fujiki K, Murakami A. Tear chymase in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:417–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tabbara KF. Tear tryptase in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:338–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Irkec MT, Orhan M, Erdener U. Role of tear inflammatory mediators in contact lens-associated giant papillary conjunctivitis in soft contact lens wearers. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 1999;7:35–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.An S, Raju I, Surenkhuu B, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to pathological changes of ocular graft-vs.-host disease (oGVHD) dry eye: Implications for novel biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. Ocul Surf 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Reyes JL, Vannan DT, Eksteen B, et al. Innate and Adaptive Cell Populations Driving Inflammation in Dry Eye Disease. Mediators Inflamm 2018;2018:2532314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Trocme SD, Leiferman KM, George T, et al. Neutrophil and eosinophil participation in atopic and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Curr Eye Res 2003;26:319–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Roy NS, Wei Y, Kuklinski E, Asbell PA. The Growing Need for Validated Biomarkers and Endpoints for Dry Eye Clinical Research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:BIO1–BIO19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Leonardi A, Brun P, Abatangelo G, Plebani M, Secchi AG. Tear levels and activity of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-9 in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3052–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ghavami S, Hashemi M, de Serres FJ, Bajestani SN, Mehrabifar H, Leonardi A. Trypsin inhibitory capacity in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:264–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kumagai N, Yamamoto K, Fukuda K, et al. Active matrix metalloproteinases in the tear fluid of individuals with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:489–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Leonardi A, Sathe S, Bortolotti M, Beaton A, Sack R. Cytokines, matrix metalloproteases, angiogenic and growth factors in tears of normal subjects and vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Allergy 2009;64:710–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Memarzadeh S, Kozak KR, Chang L, et al. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: Prognostic biomarker for endometrial cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:10647–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ozkaya E, Akduman H, Erenberk U, Demir A, Dundaroz MR. Plasma paraoxonase activity and oxidative stress and their relationship to disease severity in children with allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013;27:13–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dadaci Z, Oncel M, Oncel Acir N, Sahin E, Borazan M. Oxidative stress parameters and serum magnesium levels in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2016;35:270–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Choi W, Lian C, Ying L, et al. Expression of Lipid Peroxidation Markers in the Tear Film and Ocular Surface of Patients with Non-Sjogren Syndrome: Potential Biomarkers for Dry Eye Disease. Curr Eye Res 2016;41:1143–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kuruvilla M, Kalangara J, Lee FE. Neuropathic Pain and Itch Mechanisms Underlying Allergic Conjunctivitis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2018:0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Motterle L, Diebold Y, Enriquez de Salamanca A, et al. Altered expression of neurotransmitter receptors and neuromediators in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:462–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sacchetti M, Micera A, Lambiase A, et al. Tear levels of neuropeptides increase after specific allergen challenge in allergic conjunctivitis. Mol Vis 2011;17:47–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fujishima H, Takeyama M, Takeuchi T, Saito I, Tsubota K. Elevated levels of substance P in tears of patients with allergic conjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:372–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lambiase A, Bonini S, Micera A, et al. Increased plasma levels of substance P in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:2161–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Roy NS WY YX, Ying G, Kuklinski E, Barry B,, Maguire MGDR, Brightwell-Arnold M, and Asbell PA; for, Group tDEAaMDS. Conjunctival HLA-DR Expression and Its Association With Symptoms and Signs in DREAM study. Transl Vis Sci & Tech 2019;In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bonini S, Bonini S, Bucci MG, et al. Allergen dose response and late symptoms in a human model of ocular allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:869–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pelikan Z. Cytological changes in tears during the secondary conjunctival response induced by nasal allergy. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:941–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Avunduk AM, Avunduk MC, Dayanir V, Tekelioglu Y, Dayioglu YS. A flow cytometric study about the immunopathology of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:821–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Avunduk AM, Avunduk MC, Tekelioglu Y. Analysis of tears in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis, using flow cytometry. Ophthalmic Res 1998;30:44–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Leonardi A, DeFranchis G, Zancanaro F, et al. Identification of local Th2 and Th0 lymphocytes in vernal conjunctivitis by cytokine flow cytometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3036–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Izuhara K, Arima K, Ohta S, Suzuki S, Inamitsu M, Yamamoto KI. Periostin in Allergic Inflammation. Allergol Int 2014;63:143–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Shoda T, Futamura K, Kobayashi F, Saito H, Matsumoto K, Matsuda A. Cell type-dependent effects of corticosteroid on periostin production by primary human tissue cells. Allergy 2013;68:1467–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sidhu SS, Yuan S, Innes AL, et al. Roles of epithelial cell-derived periostin in TGF-beta activation, collagen production, and collagen gel elasticity in asthma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:14170–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Elliott CG, Wang J, Guo X, et al. Periostin modulates myofibroblast differentiation during full-thickness cutaneous wound repair. J Cell Sci 2012;125:121–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nakamura Y, Nagashima H, Ohta S, Ono J, Yamauchi K, Izuhara K. Periostin in the bronchial lavage fluid of asthma patients. Allergol Int 2015;64:209–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ontsuka K, Kotobuki Y, Shiraishi H, et al. Periostin, a matricellular protein, accelerates cutaneous wound repair by activating dermal fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol 2012;21:331–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bentley JK, Chen Q, Hong JY, et al. Periostin is required for maximal airways inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;134:1433–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Matsumoto H. Serum periostin: a novel biomarker for asthma management. Allergol Int 2014;63:153–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kou K, Okawa T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Periostin levels correlate with disease severity and chronicity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2014;171:283–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Masuoka M, Shiraishi H, Ohta S, et al. Periostin promotes chronic allergic inflammation in response to Th2 cytokines. J Clin Invest 2012;122:2590–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Corren J, Lemanske RF, Hanania NA, et al. Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with asthma. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1088–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kanemitsu Y, Matsumoto H, Izuhara K, et al. Increased periostin associates with greater airflow limitation in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;132:305–12 e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mantelli F, Argueso P. Functions of ocular surface mucins in health and disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;8:477–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Paulsen F, Langer G, Hoffmann W, Berry M. Human lacrimal gland mucins. Cell Tissue Res 2004;316:167–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dogru M, Matsumoto Y, Okada N, et al. Alterations of the ocular surface epithelial MUC16 and goblet cell MUC5AC in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy 2008;63:1324–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dogru M, Okada N, Asano-Kato N, et al. Atopic ocular surface disease: implications on tear function and ocular surface mucins. Cornea 2005;24:S18–S23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dogru M, Okada N, Asano-Kato N, et al. Alterations of the ocular surface epithelial mucins 1, 2, 4 and the tear functions in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2006;36:1556–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Corum I, Yeniad B, Bilgin LK, Ilhan R. Efficiency of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis and goblet cell density. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:400–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Andrade FEC, Correa MP, Gimenes AD, et al. Galectin-3: role in ocular allergy and potential as a predictive biomarker. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:1003–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kuo MT, Fang PC, Chao TL, et al. Tear Proteomics Approach to Monitoring Sjogren Syndrome or Dry Eye Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Deckers IA, McLean S, Linssen S, Mommers M, van Schayck CP, Sheikh A. Investigating international time trends in the incidence and prevalence of atopic eczema 1990–2010: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. PLoS One 2012;7:e39803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wollenberg A, Ariens L, Thurau S, van Luijk C, Seegraber M, de Bruin-Weller M. Conjunctivitis occurring in atopic dermatitis patients treated with dupilumab-clinical characteristics and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2018;6:1778–80 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Seegraber M, Srour J, Walter A, Knop M, Wollenberg A. Dupilumab for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018;11:467–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Fukushima A, Yamaguchi T, Ishida W, Fukata K, Yagita H, Ueno H. Roles of OX40 in the development of murine experimental allergic conjunctivitis: exacerbation and attenuation by stimulation and blocking of OX40. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:657–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Thyssen JP, Toft PB, Halling-Overgaard AS, Gislason GH, Skov L, Egeberg A. Incidence, prevalence, and risk of selected ocular disease in adults with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;77:280–6 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Matsuda A, Asada Y, Suita N, et al. Transcriptome profiling of refractory atopic keratoconjunctivitis by RNA sequencing. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019;143:1610–4 e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wakamatsu TH, Tanaka M, Satake Y, et al. Eosinophil cationic protein as a marker for assessing the efficacy of tacrolimus ophthalmic solution in the treatment of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Mol Vis 2011;17:932–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Pong JC, Chu CY, Chu KO, et al. Identification of hemopexin in tear film. Anal Biochem 2010;404:82–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Shoji J, Inada N, Sawa M. Evaluation of eotaxin-1, −2, and −3 protein production and messenger RNA expression in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2009;53:92–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Shoji J, Kawaguchi A, Gotoh A, Inada N, Sawa M. Concentration of soluble interleukin-6 receptors in tears of allergic conjunctival disease patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:332–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kitaichi N, Shimizu T, Honda A, et al. Increase in macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels in lacrimal fluid of patients with severe atopic dermatitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:825–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Yamagami S, Ebihara N, Amano SY. Chemokine receptor gene expression in giant papillae of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Mol Vis 2005;11:192–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Leonardi ACJCV. Multiple cytokine evaluation in tears of allergic conjunctivitis patients by Multi–Cytokine Bead Assay Invet Ophthalmol @ vis sci 2004;45:625. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Leonardi A, Brun P, Tavolato M, Plebani M, Abatangelo G, Secchi AG. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003;13:606–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Leonardi A, Jose PJ, Zhan H, Calder VL. Tear and mucus eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 in allergic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 2003;110:487–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Fukagawa K, Nakajima T, Tsubota K, Shimmura S, Saito H, Hirai K. Presence of eotaxin in tears of patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis with severe corneal damage. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:1220–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Izuhara K, Nunomura S, Nanri Y, et al. Periostin in inflammation and allergy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2017;74:4293–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Abelson MB, Leonardi AA, Smith LM, Fregona IA, George MA, Secchi AG. Histaminase activity in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1958–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Martinez R, Acera A, Soria J, Gonzalez N, Suarez T. [Allergic mediators in tear from children with seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2011;86:187–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
