Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Obes. 2019 Dec 27;15(5):e12608. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12608

Associations between dietary patterns, eating behaviours and body composition and adiposity in 3-year old children of mothers with obesity

Kathryn V Dalrymple 1, Angela C Flynn 1, Paul T Seed 1, Annette L Briley 1, Majella O’Keeffe 2, Keith M Godfrey 3, Lucilla Poston, on behalf of the UPBEAT Consortium1
PMCID: PMC7124886  EMSID: EMS85509  PMID: 31883218

Abstract

Background

The relationships between eating habits, behaviours and the development of obesity in pre-school children is not well established.

Objective

As children of mothers with obesity are themselves at risk of obesity, we examined these relationships in a cohort of 482 three-year-old children of mothers with obesity from the UPBEAT study.

Method

Dietary patterns were derived using factor analysis of an 85-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Eating behaviours were assessed using the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ). Measures of body composition included age-specific BMI cut-offs, WHO z-scores, sum of skinfolds, waist and arm circumferences and body fat percentage. Using adjusted regression analysis, we examined associations between dietary patterns, eating behaviours and measures of body composition.

Results

Three distinct dietary patterns were defined; “healthy/prudent”, “African/Caribbean” and “processed/snacking”. The “processed/snacking” pattern was associated with greater odds of obesity; OR 1.53 (95%CI: 1.07 to 2.19). The “African/Caribbean” and the “healthy/prudent” patterns were associated with a lower arm circumference (β=-0.23cm (-0.45 to -0.01)) and sum of skinfolds (β=-1.36cm (-2.88 to -0.37)), respectively. Lower enjoyment of food and food responsiveness, and greater slowness in eating and satiety, were associated with lower arm and waist circumferences, WHO z-scores and obesity (all p<0.05).

Conclusion

In children of mothers with obesity, those who had higher scores on a “processed/snacking” dietary pattern had greater odds of obesity. In contrast slowness in eating was associated with lower measures of body composition. These novel findings highlight modifiable behaviours in high-risk pre-school children which could contribute to public health strategies for prevention of childhood obesity.

Keywords: childhood obesity, dietary patterns, maternal obesity, eating behaviours

Introduction

Recent figures from the National Child Measurement Programme in England suggest that nearly a quarter of pre-school children have overweight or obesity1, with one in 40 children being affected by severe obesity. Obesity in early life is a predictor for adolescent and adulthood obesity 24, with a recent meta-analysis of 37 studies reporting that children classified as having obesity using body mass index (BMI) were five-times more likely to have obesity as adults compared to their healthy weight counterparts 5. Worldwide, there is intense focus on reducing rates of childhood obesity 6,7. The UK government recommend creating healthier food environments in schools, local areas and providing parents with information on healthy food choices for their families with the aim of halving rates of childhood obesity by 2030 6.

Several studies have independently suggested a relationship between eating behaviours 811 or dietary intake 12,13 and body composition in childhood. Associations between weight status in early life and food approach eating behaviours, such as food responsiveness and emotional overeating and consumption of energy dense foods have consistently been reported. Longitudinal studies suggest that eating habits and food choices established in childhood are likely to persist into adulthood 1418. Therefore, the early years provide a unique opportunity to develop and establish healthy eating habits and behaviours.

Since current guidelines for prevention of childhood obesity recommend identification of populations at risk and early engagement 6,7, we have addressed relationships between dietary habits and behaviours and childhood adiposity in children born to mothers with obesity. As recently reported by ourselves in a contemporary cohort 19, and previously in many mother-child cohort studies, children of mothers with obesity are at high-risk of developing obesity themselves 20.

The primary aims of this study were to investigate 1) associations of childhood dietary patterns with measures of body composition and 2) associations between child’s eating behaviours and measures of body composition in the 3-year old children born to mothers from inner city settings and ethnically diverse backgrounds (UK Pregnancy Better Eating and Activity Trial, UPBEAT). The role of socio-economic deprivation in these relationships was also examined.

Methods

UPBEAT was a randomised controlled trial which explored the effect of an intensive 8-week antenatal diet and physical activity intervention in 1555 women with a BMI ≥30kg/m2 21. The intervention focused on improving insulin sensitivity through reducing dietary glycaemic load, saturated fat intake, and increasing physical activity in comparison to standard antenatal care. The participants were from UK inner-city settings of ethnic diversity and high socioeconomic deprivation. Details of the intervention inclusion and exclusion criteria have been published previously 21,22.

The intervention had no effect on the primary outcomes of gestational diabetes and large for gestational age infants. However, it was effective at improving maternal dietary intake, reducing gestational weight gain and sum of skinfolds and increasing self-reported physical activity by 36 weeks’ gestation (all p≤0.04). In the infants at 6 months of age we have reported that the intervention was associated with a reduction in a measure of adiposity 23; as a cohort analysis in these infants, we have also shown positive assciations between measures of appetite, assessed by the Baby Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, and body fat percentage, weight and growth 24.

Between August 2014 and October 2017 participants in the UPBEAT study were invited to attend a 3-year post-delivery visit with their children. The study design and protocol of the follow-up were approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (UK Integrated Research Application System; reference 13/LO/1108). The children were included in this analysis if they had 1) attended the follow-up visit at 3-years of age; 2) had eating behaviour and food frequency questionnaires completed by the main caregiver; and 3) had body composition data recorded during the 3-year visit. Children were excluded if they were suffering from severe illness or if they were born before 34 weeks’ gestation.

Child Variables

Food Frequency Questionnaire

The child’s diet was assessed using an 85-item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The list of food and drink items were compiled from the 80-item validated Southampton Women’s Survey FFQ 25. In addition, three questions were extended to include culturally appropriate options, e.g. “Rice-boiled & fried” extended to “Rice-boiled & fried jollof, rice and peas”. Five extra food items were included which were culturally appropriate for the non-white ethnic subgroups in the UPBEAT cohort (Black – including Afro Caribbean and African) (Supplementary Table 1). The FFQ asked how often in the last three months the child had consumed each item with response options including: never, less than once per month, 1-3 times per month, number of times per week (1-7) or more than once per day. If the item was consumed more than once a day, the number of times was recorded. Food and drink items consumed more than once a week which were not included in the FFQ were recorded as additional items. Type of milk consumed as a drink or added to cereal and sugar added to drinks and cereal was also collected.

Dietary patterns of the children were derived using factor analysis. Food and drink items listed in the FFQ were categorised into 39 groups based on similar nutritional composition. On the basis of frequency consumption, three items recorded as additional foods were also included: porridge/shredded wheat, fast food (McDonalds, Burger King and KFC) and cereals bars (Supplementary Table 1). Factor analysis with orthogonal varimax rotation was performed to derive the patterns using the children’s weekly standardised frequency of each of the 39 food groups. The number of factors retained was chosen using the scree plot of eigenvalues. Within each factor, food groups with a factor loading coefficient ≥ ± 0.22 were chosen (Supplementary Table 2); this cut-off was selected so that each dietary pattern had equal distribution of food groups. Food groups with a factor loading coefficient ≥ ±0.32 were considered to have a strong association with that factor. Derived dietary pattern labels were selected based on foods with the highest factor loadings (≥ ±0.32).

Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire 26 (CEBQ) is a validated parent-reported psychometric method to assess child's eating style and behaviour 27. The questionnaire consists of 35 items divided into eight eating behaviours, further sub-divided into food approach and food avoidance questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale (Never=1, Rarely=2, Sometimes=3, Often=4, Always=5) Seven reverse scoring questions. Food approach behaviours include food responsiveness, emotional over-eating, enjoyment of food and desire to drink; food avoidance behaviours were satiety responsiveness, slowness in eating, emotional under-eating, and food fussiness. Higher scores indicate a higher level for the respective eating style.

Anthropometric measures and body fat percentage

The outcomes of interest for the offspring were measures of body composition and adiposity assessed by sum of skinfold thicknesses (addition of triceps, bicep, subscapular, suprailiac and abdominal skinfolds, measured in triplicate by trained research staff using children’s Holtain skinfold callipers), mid-upper arm and waist circumferences, body fat percentage assessed by ImpediMed Imp SFB7 bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and weight, height and BMI z-scores derived using the World Health Organisation (WHO) reference data 28. Childhood obesity was defined by International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) sex-specific centiles (boys obesity = 98.9th centile and girls obesity = 98.6th centile) 29.

Maternal variables

We also addressed relationships between maternal social and demographic variables (maternal age at trial entry, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, years in full-time education and early-pregnancy BMI) and offspring eating habits.

Statistical analysis

In this secondary analysis of the UPBEAT study there was no effect of the intervention on offspring eating patterns or behaviours, therefore the data was treated as a cohort. Demographic results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median and interquartile range or percent and number as appropriate. Depending on the outcome of interest, unadjusted and adjusted linear, logistic or quantile regression were used. Unadjusted regression (model 1) was performed to analyse the relationship between maternal social and demographic factors and dietary patterns at age 3-years, followed by adjusted regression (model 2) to investigate the relationship of the derived dietary patterns and the eight CEBQ subscale scores with the nine measures of body composition at age 3-years. For model 2 confounding variables were selected due to their association with dietary intake and body composition and included the minimisation variables from the main trial (maternal BMI at trial enrolment, parity and ethnicity), smoking status at baseline, maternal age, years spent in full time education, infant birthweight, child’s age at follow-up, sex and randomisation arm. Coefficients or odds ratios were presented with 95% confidence intervals. Data was analysed using Stata software, version 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).

Results

Figure 1 shows a flow chart of participants through the study. 514 children (33.0% of the original UPBEAT cohort) were followed up at age 3 years (3.5±0.28 years). 490 (95%) provided complete dietary data (FFQ and CEBQ), eight children were excluded as they were either born ≤34 weeks gestation or were suffering from severe illness, therefore the study population comprised of 482 children. Data for the majority of measures of anthropometry had less than 5% missingness except for BIA (20%) and sum of skinfolds (23%). Of the 482 included children, 243 (50%) were female and 234 (49%) were born to mothers who were randomised to the UPBEAT intervention arm. Mean maternal age was 31.2±5.2 years; 68% were White, 23% were Black African/Caribbean and 9% were from Asian or other ethnic backgrounds. 76% were from the index of multiple deprivation quintiles 4 and 5 (most deprived). 165 of the children (34%) were overweight or had obesity, and 6% were morbidly obese (defined using the IOTF sex specific centiles 29). For the WHO z-scores, the average height-for-age, weight-for-age and weight-for-height were above the mean of the reference population 0.38±1.1, 0.83±1.0 and 0.90±1.0, respectively (Table 1).

Figure 1. Consort diagram of participants enrolled in the UPBEAT trial at 3 years postpartum.

Figure 1

Table 1. Maternal and offspring demographics of the analysed sample (n=482).

Maternal demographics Mean (SD)/Median (IQR)/N (%)
Pre-pregnancy

Age (years) 31.2 (5.2)

Ethnicity White 329 (68)
Black 110 (23)
Asian 20 (4)
Other 23 (5)

Years in full time education 15.0 (2.8)
Maternal BMI (kg/m2) a 34.7 (32.5 to 37.9)
Nulliparous 229 (50)

Index of Multiple Deprivation Quintiles b 1 (least deprived) 30 (6)
2 31 (6)
3 55 (12)
4 172 (36)
5 (most deprived) 191 (40)

Maternal antenatal and neonatal demographics

Mother assigned to UPBEAT Intervention 234 (49)
Gestational diabetes mellitus c 116 (25)
Birthweight (g) 3499 (499)
Large for gestational age >90th centile d 61 (12)
Small for gestational age <10th centile d 34 (7)

Child 3-year follow-up demographics

Age (years) 3.5 (0.28)
Female 243 (50)
Mother living with a partner 387 (80)
Mother a current smoker 47 (9)

Mode of infant feeding at 4 months Breastfed 135 (52)
Formula fed 105 (41)
Mixed fed 18 (7)

BMI z-score d 472 0.88 (1.0)
Height-for-age z-score d 477 0.38 (1.1)
Weight-for-age z-score d 477 0.83 (1.0)
Weight-for-height z-score d 472 0.90 (1.0)

International Obesity Task Force gender specific cut-offs BMI categorises e Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2) 15 (3)
Healthy (18.5-24.9 kg/m2) 292 (62)
Overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2) 125 (26)
Obese (30.0-34.9 kg/m2) 14 (3)
Morbidly obese (≥35.0 kg/m2) 26 (6)

Sum of skinfolds (mm) a, f 371 41.3 (34.0 to 50)
Percentage body fat (%) 382 22.3 (6.5)
Arm circumference (cm) 462 17.7 (1.8)
Waist circumference (cm) 466 53.0 (4.3)
a

Median (interquartile range)

b

Scores were calculated for the region of residence, by fifths of the population. UK-wide scores were developed from English and Scottish data relating to employment and income domains

c

Gestational diabetes diagnosed using the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Group’s criteria at 24–28 weeks’ gestation

d

World Health Organisation (2007) z-score

e

IOTF International cut-off as BMI references

f

sum of triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac and abdominal skinfold thicknesses (mm).

Dietary pattern analysis

Factor analysis identified three dietary patterns in the children, summarised in Supplementary Figure 1 with the full list of factor loadings shown in Supplementary Table 2. The first dietary pattern was labelled ‘healthy/prudent’ due to high loadings (≥0.32) on brown bread, boiled and baked potatoes, rice and pasta, fish, vegetables, beans and pulses, fruit (fresh, tinned and dried) and nuts. The second dietary pattern was characterised as a diet high in white bread, crisps and savoury snacks, roast potatoes (including chips), processed foods, quiche and pizza, confectionary, desserts, cakes, biscuits and low and high sugary drinks and this pattern was termed ‘processed/snacking’. The third pattern, ‘African/Caribbean’ was characterised by yam/cassava/plantain, red meat, chicken and turkey, soups (including African and Caribbean soups) and rice/pasta, fish and offal and was low in cheese, yoghurts and spreads.

Maternal demographics

In a univariate analysis (model 1) different maternal social and demographic characteristics were associated with the three childhood dietary patterns. A higher number of years in full time education and a higher maternal age were associated with the child having a higher score on a healthy/prudent dietary pattern. Fewer years in full time education, lower maternal age and having a White mother were associated with the child having a higher score on a processed/snacking dietary pattern. Having a Black mother and a greater deprivation defined by index of multi-deprivation were associated with the child having a high score on an African/Caribbean dietary pattern (Supplementary Table 3, all p<0.05).

Dietary patterns and anthropometric measures and body fat percentage

In the adjusted regression model (model 2), the healthy/prudent dietary pattern was associated with a -1.76cm (95% confidence interval -3.30 to -0.14, p=0.03) lower sum of skinfolds. The processed/snacking pattern was associated with a higher odds of obesity [(BMI ≥30kg/m2), defined using the IOTF gender-specific cut-odds 29] (OR =1.53 (1.07 to 2.19) p=0.04). The African/Caribbean pattern was associated with a lower arm circumference (-0.23cm (-0.45 to -0.01), p=0.04) (Table 2). No other dietary pattern-body composition associations were found.

Table 2. Adjusted associations between offspring dietary patterns at age 3-years and body composition.

Healthy Processed and Snacking African and Caribbean
Coefficient/ Odds ratio+ (95% CI) Coefficient/ Odds ratio+ (95% CI) Coefficient/ Odds ratio+ (95% CI)
BMI z-score a, d 472 -0.01 (-0.12 to 0.09) P=0.82 0.06 (-0.04 to 0.16) P=0.23 -0.08 (-0.21 to 0.04) p=0.20
Body fat percentage (%) 382 -0.10 (-0.92 to 0.71) P=0.80 0.66 (-0.10 to 1.43) P=0.09 -0.64 (-1.41 to 0.48) p=0.33
Height-for-age z-score a, d 477 0.02 (-0.08 to 0.13) P=0.65 0.02 (-0.08 to 0.12) P=0.69 0.07 (-0.05 to 0.21) P=0.24
Height-for-weight z-score a, d 472 -0.02 (-0.12 to 0.08) p=0.72 0.08 (-0.01 to 0.18) p=0.09 -0.08 (-0.21 to 0.04) p=0.18
Weight-for-age z-score a, d 477 -0.01 (-0.12 to 0.09) P=0.75 0.05 (-0.04 to 0.15) P=0.28 -0.007 (-0.13 to 0.12) p=0.91
Arm (cm) 462 -0.1 (-0.29 to 0.08) P=0.28 0.15 (-0.03 to 0.33) P=0.10 -0.23 (-0.45 to -0.01) P=0.04
Waist (cm) 466 0.06 (-0.39 to 0.51) P=0.79 0.10 (-0.33 to 0.52) P=0.66 -0.45 (-0.98 to 0.08) P=0.09
Sum of skinfolds (mm) b 371 -1.76 (-3.30 to -0.14) P=0.03 0.63 (-1.59 to 2.86) P=0.57 -0.89 (-3.12 to 1.33) p=0.43
Obese (IOFT cut off) c, d 472 1.07 (0.73 to 1.56) P=0.70 1.53 (1.07 to 2.19) P=0.002 0.61 (0.37 to 1.01) p=0.056

IOTF: International Obesity Task Force, gender specific BMI cut-offs

a

Z-scores calculated using the WHO growth standards (2007)

b

sum of triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac and abdominal skinfold thicknesses (mm)

c

Odds ratio.

+

Adjusted for maternal ethnicity, socio-economic status, smoking and BMI at baseline (15-18 weeks’ gestation), years spent in full time education, maternal age, parity, infant birthweight, age at follow-up and sex and randomisation arm.

d

was not adjusted for infant sex or age at follow-up. Children were excluded if they were born ≤ 34 weeks gestation or suffering from major ill health.

Eating behaviour and body composition

There were no differences in the CEBQ scores according to gender or mode of infant feeding (Supplementary Table 4 & 5). For the food approach scales, following adjustment for confounders, lower enjoyment of food and food responsiveness were associated with lower arm and waist circumferences, weight-for-age, weight-for-height and BMI z-scores and obesity (all p<0.006, Figure 2 & Figure 3). For the food avoidance scales, greater slowness in eating and satiety responsiveness were associated with a lower BMI z-score, a lower odds of obesity, weight-for-age, weight-for-height and height-for-age z-scores and arm and waist circumferences (all p<0.009, Figures 2 & 3). Food fussiness was associated with a lower BMI, odds of obesity and weight-for-height z-score (all p<0.002, Figures 2 & 3). Emotional under eating was not associated with any measures of body composition or adiposity; emotional overeating was only associated with weight-for-height z-score (p=0.02). Body fat percentage and sum of skinfolds were not associated with any of the eating behaviour sub scales (data not shown).

Figure 2. Associations between measures of the CEBQ and waist and arm circumferences in children at 3-years of age.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Associations between measures of the CEBQ and the WHO z-scores in children at 3-years of age.

Figure 3

Grouping the children by BMI class, an obese BMI (IOTF BMI centile cut-off equivalent to ≥30kg/m2) vs healthy, after adjustment for confounders, the children with obesity showed higher food approach scales scores for food responsiveness (p=0.001), enjoyment of food (p=0.02) and desire to drink (p=0.03). In contrast, the food avoidance scale, slowness in eating, and satiety responsiveness (p<0.008) were inversely associated with obesity (Table 3, Supplementary Figure 2).

Table 3. Adjusted association between offspring dietary patterns at 3-years of age and eating behaviour.

Underweight Overweight Obese
Coefficient (95% CI) Coefficient (95% CI) Coefficient (95% CI)
Food approach scales (n=15) (n=125) (n=38)

Food responsiveness -0.25 (-0.68 to 0.18) P=0.25 0.27 (0.09 to 0.44) P=0.003 0.47 (0.19 to 0.74) P=0.001
Emotional overeating -0.21 (-0.47 to 0.03) P=0.096 0.05 (-0.04 to 0.15) P=0.29 0.07 (-0.09 to 0.23) P=0.39
Enjoyment of food -0.62 (-1.09 to -0.16) P=0.008 0.20 (0.02 to 0.399) P=0.02 0.34 (0.05 to 0.64) P=0.02
Desire to drink 0.20 (-0.40 to 0.81) P=0.508 0.10 (-0.14 to 0.35) P=0.418 0.42 (0.03 to 0.83) P=0.03
Food avoidance scales

Emotional under eating 0.008 (-0.49 to 0.50) P=0.94 -0.07 (-0.27 to 0.13) P=0.48 -0.20 (-0.52 to 0.11) P=0.213
Slowness in eating 0.46 (0.005 to 0.93) P=0.047 -0.08 (-0.27 to 0.09) P=0.36 -0.40 (-0.70 to -0.11) P=0.007
Food fussiness 0.71 (0.22 to 1.21) P=0.005 0.02 (-0.18 to 0.22) P=0.83 -0.28 (-0.60 to 0.03) P=0.08
Satiety responsiveness 0.19 (-0.20 to 0.58) P=0.34 -0.21 (-0.37 to -0.05) P=0.009 -0.461 (-0.71 to -0.20) P<0.001

Adjusted for maternal ethnicity, socio-economic status, smoking and BMI at baseline (15-18 weeks’ gestation), years spent in full time education, maternal age, parity, infant birthweight, sex age at follow-up and randomisation arm. Children were excluded if they were born ≤ 34 weeks gestation and suffering from major ill health.

Discussion

This study uniquely explores associations between dietary patterns and eating behaviours with BMI and measures of adiposity in 3-year-old children born to mothers with obesity from high social deprivation and ethnically diverse backgrounds.

Children with obesity had higher scores on a processed/snacking dietary pattern defined as a diet high in confectionary, crisps, processed foods, cakes and biscuits and greater food approach and less food avoidance eating behaviours. Dietary intake and body composition analyses in children have hitherto focused on specific food groups, such as sugar-sweetened beverages 30, high sugar/fat snacks 31 or fruit and vegetable intake 32. However, dietary patterns reduces dietary data into fewer variables by combining highly correlated food groups, therefore they may better define an individual’s habitual diet as they attempt to describe the whole diet rather than description of specific nutrients or foods 33. Whilst several studies have addressed relationships between dietary patterns and obesity in older children 34, we are unaware of previous reports addressing dietary patterns and adiposity in three-year olds even though at this age the children may already be on a trajectory to development of later life obesity 35. Arguably, prevention at this age through appropriate dietary intervention may have particular gain in terms of prevention of adult obesity, as previous studies have reported that dietary patterns track from early childhood to later life 36. A report of dietary patterns in the UK ALSPAC cohort of children described ‘healthy’, ‘traditional’ and ‘processed’ dietary patterns in children at 3-years of age 37, whilst the healthy and processed patterns are similar to the present study, other differences may reflect ethnic diversity of the UPBEAT cohort. Comparison in relations to body composition is not possible as the ALSPAC study did not include measurement of adiposity, although there was no association between dietary patterns at 3-years and body mass index when measured at age 7-years 38.

Our findings support those from the CHASE cohort who described that UK Black/African 9-10-year-old children benefit from maintaining a traditional African/Caribbean diet. This was evident from the observed association of high scores on an African/Caribbean dietary pattern with a lower arm circumference despite the Black women having a higher index of multi-deprivation. CHASE showed that a traditional African/Caribbean diet in late childhood was associated with an improved lipid profile, and compared to a White-European diet the overall nutrient content was lower in total fats and higher in carbohydrates 39, and lower in processed foods, which might explain the relationship with the lower measure of adiposity.

We have previously reported the maternal dietary patterns of 1023 women obtained during the UPBEAT study 40 in which four distinct patterns were identified, “snacks”, “processed”, “fruit and veg” and “African/Caribbean”. Whilst only three patterns were identified in this analysis of the diets of their children they were broadly similar to those of their mothers three years previously, highlighting commonality of diet within families, as reported previously in the UK Southampton Women’s Survey 41.

Similarly to dietary patterns, eating behaviours developed in early life track through childhood 42. The validated CEBQ questionnaire has greatly facilitated studies of relationships between appetite traits and body composition 18,26,43. Using this questionnaire, food responsiveness and enjoyment of food were associated with higher arm and waist circumferences, weight-for-age, weight-for-height and BMI z-scores and higher odds of obesity. In contrast slowness in eating and satiety responsiveness were inversely associated with the same measures of body composition, suggesting that these traits are protective against an obesogenic environment. Importantly, slower eating is a modifiable eating style which may reduce excessive weight gain in childhood. The associations between enjoyment of food and food responsiveness and increased body composition and rates of obesity, are consistent with previous studies suggesting that children with overweight or obesity are more responsive to food cues 4446, but amongst these the only report of children at a similar age to this study was from an Australian cohort of 2-5 year old children, although the results were based on parent reported measurements 46.

In agreement with BASELINE, an observational study in 1189 2-year old children from Ireland 43 we did not find associations between emotional under/over eating and desire to drink and measures of body composition. This could be because the children were too young to display emotion in relation to eating habits. Although, in older children a similar lack of an association has been found. 47 This may imply that these three measures from the CEBQ do not have a major impact on body composition and adiposity compared to the other sub-scales.

The offspring of mothers with obesity are particularly at risk of obesity and this is the first study to address dietary patterns and eating behaviours associated with obesity in such children. As previously described by ourselves 19 and others, there is a striking relationship between maternal obesity and offspring risk of obesity 20,48. Whether this arises from shared familial environment, shared genes or the maternal in-utero environment or a combination of all three is not established. Animal models and some of the human cohort studies however have argued for a major contribution of in-utero determinants through persistent effects on the developing fetus, including modification of the pathways of energy balance at the level of the hypothalamus 49,50. This is supported by the recent finding of an association between perinatal methylation of the SLC6A4 gene implicated in appetite regulation and obesity in later childhood 51. Whether the relationships between food approach and food avoidance variables with measures of childhood adiposity in these children are a direct result of the in-utero environment cannot be established from this study, although future comparisons of the strength of these relationships within cohorts of children from mothers of a healthy BMI, with appropriate adjustment for confounders, could shed light on the aetiology of these relationships.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths of the study include the rich UPBEAT dataset which provides comprehensive information on the eating habits and behavioural origins of early childhood obesity and multiple determinants of childhood body composition and adiposity. The sample of the mothers and their offspring included are ethnically diverse and of low socio-economic status. To our knowledge this the only study which has combined dietary patterns and eating behaviours in the same study of childhood obesity at any age. Limitations include loss to follow-up of the study population which may result in selection bias; however, there were no differences in the maternal population who completed the 3-year follow-up compared to those who did not, except for a higher proportion of white women returning for the 3-year visit. The CEBQ is a parent reported measure and is subject to recall bias and the main care giver’s own interpretation of eating behaviours, however the CEBQ is validated and previous trials have reported high internal validity. The dietary patterns, derived using factor analysis, involve a number of arbitrary decisions including consolidation of food items into groups, the number of factors to extract, rotation method and naming of the factors. FFQs are also associated with recall bias from the child’s main caregiver 52. The measures of body composition utilised in this study have limitations. BMI standardised cut-offs, z-scores, BIA and sum of skinfolds which was used to define obesity and adiposity in the children are indirect measures of fat mass; future studies should consider validating measures of body composition with DEXA, which is widely recognised as a good measure of adiposity 53. Lastly, our study was observational, so causality of the associations cannot be assumed.

In summary, we found that food approach eating behaviours and a diet high in processed and snacking foods were associated with obesity and measures of body composition at 3 years of age in children of mothers with obesity. Conversely slower eating, a “healthy/prudent” or a traditional “African/Caribbean” diet were associated with lower rates of obesity or adiposity. This study provides evidence for potentially modifiable determinants and adds credence to the view that promoting healthy food alternatives and eating behaviours should be considered for assimilation into public health strategies in high-risk children at risk of obesity in early life.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We thank all staff in the UPBEAT consortium and we are most grateful to all the women and their children who took part in the UPBEAT study.

Sources of support: This work was supported by the European Union's 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project EarlyNutrition; grant agreement no. 289346 and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (RP-0407-10452). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health or any other listed funders. Support was also provided from the Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, the Chief Scientist Office Scotland, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity and Tommy’s Charity (Registered charity no. 1060508). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the final report. The corresponding author had access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. LP, PTS, ACF and ALB are funded by Tommy’s Charity and KVD is supported by the British Heart Foundation FS/17/71/32953. KMG is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12011/4), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0515-10042) and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre), the European Union (Erasmus+ Capacity-Building ENeASEA Project and Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), projects EarlyNutrition and ODIN (Grant agreements 289346 and 613977), the US National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health (Award No. U24AG047867) and the UK ESRC and BBSRC (Award No. ES/M00919X/1).

Abbreviations

ALSPAC

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

BIA

bio-electrical impedance analysis

BMI

body mass index

CEBQ

Childhood Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

FFQ

Food frequency questionnaire

IOTF

International Obesity Task Force

UPBEAT

UK Pregnancy Better Eating and Activity Trial

SWS

Southampton Women’s Survey

WHO

World Health Organisation

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: KMG reports other from Nestle Nutrition Institute, grants from Nestec, outside the submitted work; In addition, KMG has a patent Phenotype prediction issued, a patent Predictive use of CpG methylation issued, a patent Maternal Nutrition Composition pending, and a patent Vitamin B6 in maternal administration for the prevention of overweight or obesity in the offspring issued. LP is part of an academic consortium that has received research funding from Abbott Nutrition and Danone. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors contribution: The authors responsibilities were as follows – PTS, ALB, KMG and LP conceptualised and designed the study. KVD, ACF, MOK and PTS drafted and carried out the analyses. KVD, ACF, MOK and LP had overall responsibility for the manuscript. KVD, ACF, PTS, ALB, MOK, KMG and LP critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Clinical Trial Registry Name and Registration Number: The UPBEAT trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN89971375.

References

  • 1.National Child Measurement Programme, England - 2017/18 School Year [PAS] NHS Digital; [Accessed July 26, 2019]. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/national-child-measurement-programme/2017-18-school-year. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, Van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Druet C, Ong KK. Early childhood predictors of adult body composition. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22(3):489–502. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geserick M, Vogel M, Gausche R, et al. Acceleration of BMI in Early Childhood and Risk of Sustained Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1303–1312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simmonds M, Llewellyn A, Owen C, Woolacott N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(2):95–107. doi: 10.1111/obr.12334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Childhood obesity: a plan for action. GOV.UK; [Accessed April 25, 2019]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childhood-obesity-a-plan-for-action/childhood-obesity-a-plan-for-action. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Geneva; 2016. [Accessed March 9, 2018]. http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van Jaarsveld CH, Boniface D, Llewellyn CH, Wardle J. Appetite and growth: a longitudinal sibling analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):345–350. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McCarthy EK, Chaoimh Cní, Murray DM, Hourihane JO, Kenny LC, Kiely M. Eating behaviour and weight status at 2 years of age: data from the Cork BASELINE Birth Cohort Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(12):1356–1359. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spence JC, Carson V, Casey L, Boule N. Examining behavioural susceptibility to obesity among Canadian pre-school children: the role of eating behaviours. Int J Pediatr Obes IJPO Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2011;6(2–2):e501–507. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2010.512087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eloranta A-M, Lindi V, Schwab U, et al. Dietary factors associated with overweight and body adiposity in Finnish children aged 6-8 years: the PANIC Study. Int J Obes 2005. 2012;36(7):950–955. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wolters M, Joslowski G, Plachta-Danielzik S, et al. Dietary Patterns in Primary School are of Prospective Relevance for the Development of Body Composition in Two German Pediatric Populations. Nutrients. 2018;10(10) doi: 10.3390/nu10101442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fernández-Alvira JM, Bammann K, Eiben G, et al. Prospective associations between dietary patterns and body composition changes in European children: the IDEFICS study. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(18):3257–3265. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nicklaus S, Boggio V, Chabanet C, Issanchou S. A prospective study of food variety seeking in childhood, adolescence and early adult life. Appetite. 2005;44(3):289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Northstone K, Emmett PM. Are dietary patterns stable throughout early and mid-childhood? A birth cohort study. Br J Nutr. 2008;100(5):1069–1076. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508968264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Skinner JD, Carruth BR, Bounds W, Ziegler P, Reidy K. Do food-related experiences in the first 2 years of life predict dietary variety in school-aged children? J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34(6):310–315. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwartz C, Scholtens PAMJ, Lalanne A, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite. 2011;57(3):796–807. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the Development of Children’s Eating Behaviours: From Infancy to Adolescence. Can J Diet Pract Res Publ Dietit Can Rev Can Prat Rech En Diet Une Publ Diet Can. 2007;68(1):s1–s56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dalrymple KV, Thompson JMD, Begum S, et al. Relationships of maternal body mass index and plasma biomarkers with childhood body mass index and adiposity at 6 years: The Children of SCOPE study. Pediatr Obes. 2019 Jun;:e12537. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heslehurst N, Vieira R, Akhter Z, et al. The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2019;16(6):e1002817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(10):767–777. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Briley AL, Barr S, Badger S, et al. A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women; the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Patel N, Godfrey K, Pasupathy D, et al. Infant adiposity following a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnancy. Int J Obes. 2017;41(7):1018–1026. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patel N, Dalrymple KV, Briley AL, et al. Mode of infant feeding, eating behaviour and anthropometry in infants at 6-months of age born to obese women – a secondary analysis of the UPBEAT trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1995-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jarman M, Fisk C, Ntani G, et al. Assessing diets of 3 year old children: evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(5):1069–1077. doi: 10.1017/S136898001300102X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L. Development of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42(7):963–970. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carnell S, Wardle J. Measuring behavioural susceptibility to obesity: validation of the child eating behaviour questionnaire. Appetite. 2007;48(1):104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.de Onis M. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(S450):76–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7(4):284–294. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scharf RJ, DeBoer MD. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Children’s Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37(1):273–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rollins BY, Loken E, Savage JS, Birch LL. Maternal controlling feeding practices and girls’ inhibitory control interact to predict changes in BMI and eating in the absence of hunger from 5 to 7 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(2):249–257. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.063545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kepper M, Tseng T-S, Volaufova J, Scribner R, Nuss H, Sothern M. Pre-school obesity is inversely associated with vegetable intake, grocery stores and outdoor play. Pediatr Obes. 2016;11(5):e6–e8. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ambrosini GL. Childhood dietary patterns and later obesity: a review of the evidence. Proc Nutr Soc. 2014;73(1):137–146. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113003765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ward ZJ, Long MW, Resch SC, Giles CM, Cradock AL, Gortmaker SL. Simulation of Growth Trajectories of Childhood Obesity into Adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2145–2153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mikkilä V, Räsänen L, Raitakari OT, Pietinen P, Viikari J. Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(6):923–931. doi: 10.1079/bjn20051418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.North K, Emmett P. Multivariate analysis of diet among three-year-old children and associations with socio-demographic characteristics. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ALSPAC) Study Team. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(1):73–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reilly JJ, Armstrong J, Dorosty AR, et al. Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study. BMJ. 2005;330(7504):1357. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38470.670903.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Donin AS, Nightingale CM, Owen CG, et al. Ethnic differences in blood lipids and dietary intake between UK children of black African, black Caribbean, South Asian, and white European origin: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE) Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(4):776–783. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Flynn AC, Seed PT, Patel N, et al. Dietary patterns in obese pregnant women; influence of a behavioral intervention of diet and physical activity in the UPBEAT randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0450-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fisk CM, Crozier SR, Inskip HM, et al. Influences on the quality of young children’s diets: the importance of maternal food choices. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(2):287–296. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510003302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ashcroft J, Semmler C, Carnell S, van Jaarsveld CHM, Wardle J. Continuity and stability of eating behaviour traits in children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62(8):985–990. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sleddens EF, Kremers SP, Thijs C. The children’s eating behaviour questionnaire: factorial validity and association with Body Mass Index in Dutch children aged 6-7. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Webber L, Hill C, Saxton J, Jaarsveld CHMV, Wardle J. Eating behaviour and weight in children. Int J Obes. 2009;33(1):21–28. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jansen A, Theunissen N, Slechten K, et al. Overweight children overeat after exposure to food cues. Eat Behav. 2003;4(2):197–209. doi: 10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Boswell N, Byrne R, Davies PSW. Eating behavior traits associated with demographic variables and implications for obesity outcomes in early childhood. Appetite. 2018;120:482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Viana V, Sinde S, Saxton JC. Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: associations with BMI in Portuguese children. Br J Nutr. 2008;100(2):445–450. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508894391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Catalano PM, Farrell K, Thomas A, et al. Perinatal risk factors for childhood obesity and metabolic dysregulation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1303–1313. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Taylor PD, Poston L. Developmental programming of obesity in mammals. Exp Physiol. 2007;92(2):287–298. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Molle RD, Bischoff AR, Portella AK, Silveira PP. The fetal programming of food preferences: current clinical and experimental evidence. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2016;7(3):222–230. doi: 10.1017/S2040174415007187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lillycrop KA, Garratt ES, Titcombe P, et al. Differential SLC6A4 methylation: a predictive epigenetic marker of adiposity from birth to adulthood. Int J Obes. 2019;43(5):974–988. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0254-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Martínez ME, Marshall JR, Sechrest L. Invited commentary: Factor analysis and the search for objectivity. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(1):17–19. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Eisenmann JC, Heelan KA, Welk GJ. Assessing body composition among 3-to 8-year-old children: Anthropometry, BIA and DXA. Obes Res. 2004;12(10):1633–1640. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

RESOURCES