Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases lead to 31.5% of deaths globally, and particularly myocardial infarction (MI) results in 7.4 million deaths per year. Diagnosis of MI and monitoring for prognostic use are critical for clinical management and biomedical research, which require advanced tools with accuracy and speed. Herein, we developed a plasmonic gold nano-island (pGold) chip assay for diagnosis and monitoring of MI. On-chip microarray analysis of serum biomarkers (e.g., cardiac troponin I) afforded up to 130-fold enhancement of near-infrared fluorescence for ultra-sensitive and quantitative detection within controlled periods, using 10 μL of serum only. The pGold chip assay achieved MI diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95.54%, superior to the standard chemiluminescence immunoassay in cardiovascular clinics. Further, we monitored biomarker concentrations regarding percutaneous coronary intervention for prognostic purpose. Our work demonstrated a designed approach using plasmonic materials for enhanced diagnosis and monitoring for prognostic use towards point-of-care testing.
Subject terms: Biomarkers, Myocardial infarction, Surface chemistry, Biomedical engineering
The gold standard for diagnosis and monitoring of myocardial infarction is a chemiluminescence assay based on the detection of cardian troponin I (cTnI). Here, the authors develop a plasmonic gold nano-island chip assay for ultrasensitive detection of cTnI in as little as 10 μL of serum.
Introduction
While cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) threaten human health with the lifetime risk exceeding 30%, myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of death for CVDs nowadays1,2. Notably, the influence of MI is becoming more severe in recent decades with an annual growth rate of over 3.6%3,4, due to changes in human behavior and lifestyle, particularly in developing countries5,6. Considering the substantial progress in the treatment of MI, current management of MI is focused on diagnostic and prognostic approaches, which can reduce the medical costs and raise the survival ratio as well as life quality of patients7,8. Therefore, an advanced analytical tool would be of key significance toward efficient management of MI.
Blood test serves as the major clinical method for monitoring of diseases including but not limited to MI9,10. Blood tests are convenient, noninvasive, and accurate, superior to the conventional methods such as the electrocardiogram (ECG) and physical examination (PE)11,12. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of blood tests in clinics relies on designed materials and device, considering the following aspects: (I) high sensitivity and specificity for precision diagnostics; (II) low sample volume for point-of-care testing (POCT); (III) disease-specific performance with tailored analytical features (e.g., speed and selection of biomarkers); and (IV) multi-functions in clinical application, such as monitoring for prognostic use13,14. To date, the present blood tests are still far from ideal for monitoring of MI and call for new platforms addressing the above aspects.
Plasmonic materials are usually noble metals and afford unique optical properties for diverse biomedical use15–17. Particularly, near-infrared fluorescence enhanced (NIR-FE, the wavelength of 650–1700 nm) detection promises the state-of-the-art in vivo imaging and in vitro diagnosis, through a series of pre-selected materials interfaces18–20. For example, given characteristic gold nano-islands and immobilized immunoassays on the surface, plasmonic gold nano-island (pGold) chips afford NIR-FE detection of target molecules by high-performance microarrays21. NIR-FE detection has engaged in diagnostics including cancer22, diabetes23,24, hypertensive heart disease25, and infectious diseases etc26. To date, the application of NIR-FE in MI has not been established and a further obstacle is monitoring for prognostic use in clinics, both of which should be tackled due to the urgent needs for better MI management and multi-use in clinical laboratory and POCT.
Herein, a plasmonic gold nano-island chip based assay was developed for the diagnosis and monitoring of MI. On-chip microarray analysis of serum biomarkers (e.g., cardiac troponin I) afforded up to 130-fold enhancement of near-infrared fluorescence for ultrasensitive and quantitative detection within controlled periods (down to 30 min), using 10 μL of serum only. We achieved MI diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95.54% with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.976 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.950–1.000, p = 2.85 × 10−11), superior to the standard chemiluminescence immunoassay in cardiovascular clinics. We performed post-operative monitoring of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, the universal treatment procedure for MI). Our work demonstrated a designed approach using plasmonic materials for enhanced diagnosis and monitoring for prognostic use toward point-of-care testing.
Results
Construction and characterization of pGold chip assay
The sandwich immunoassay was constructed toward selected biomarkers on pGold chips (Fig. 1a). pGold chips (obtained from Nirmidas Biotech Inc.) afforded unique extinction spectra (Fig. 1b) and discontinuous gold nano-islands on the surface for NIR-FE detection (Fig. 1c). As shown in the high-resolution top-view SEM image inset of Fig. 1c, there are gold nano-islands with size of 80–200 nm and gaps of 10–30 nm. The wavelength of the plasmon band was ~610 nm for plasmonic gold nano-island chip and ~570 nm for sputter gold (sGold) chip21,27. We printed the triplicate microarrays of antibodies on the pGold chip (digital images in Fig. 1d, e) and assembled the device capable of 16 samples detection in parallel (Supplementary Fig. 1) for high throughput application.
The pGold chips had a surface layer of gold with a thickness of ~80 nm and microarray printing introduced the additional layer of antibodies, according to the cross-section SEM in Fig. 1d, e. The distribution of antibodies aggregates on the surface was revealed by the top-view SEM in Fig. 1f, consistent with the cross-section SEM. Therefore, using the as-printed pGold chips to quantitate serum biomarkers, immunoassays can be conducted within the optimized proximity to plasmonic surface (~hundreds of nanometers)21,22 for NIR-FE detection.
NIR-FE detection of serum biomarkers on-chip
The pGold chips enhanced NIR fluorescence up to 130-fold in the detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), compared with the glass chips according to fluorescence mapping results (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Tables 1, 2). The sGold chips with continuous gold film afforded reduced fluorescence due to the surface quenching effect28. For glass chips, the silica glass afforded no fluorescence enhancement due to non-plasmonic resonances of bulk silicate29,30 and only weak signals of fluorophore IRDye800 with a quantum yield of 0.05–0.1%21,31 can be observed, for 0.3 ng mL−1 cTnI with average fluorescence intensity of 43.84 after background noise subtraction. For sGold chips, the continuous gold film resulted in a decrease of quantum yield and quenching of fluorescence32,33, for 0.3 ng mL−1 cTnI with average fluorescence intensity of ~0 after background noise subtraction. For pGold chips, the discontinuous gold nano-islands produced surface plasmon resonance under laser22,25 and the enhanced near-infrared fluorescence can be obtained, for 0.3 ng mL−1 cTnI with average fluorescence intensity of 5727.22 after background noise subtraction. Consequently, near-infrared fluorescence enhanced detection can be obtained on pGold chips, compared with the glass chips (p < 0.0001) and sGold chips (p < 0.0001), respectively. Therefore, only the gold nano-island platform (pGold chips) yielded the expected results.
Calibration curves were recorded for cTnI in a dynamic range of 0.01–1.20 ng mL−1 on the pGold chips (Fig. 2b, superior to glass and sGold chips), with limit-of-detection (LOD) and limit-of-quantification (LOQ) of 0.0100 and 0.0157 ng mL−1, respectively (Table 1). The results demonstrated the improved LOD and LOQ of pGold chip in detecting cTnI (p < 0.05), compared with the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA, the current gold standard in serum biomarkers based MI diagnosis) in Fig. 2c, Table 1, and Supplementary Table 1. Specifically, we calculated the LOD of pGold chip assay using the following Eq. (1):
1 |
which had been reported in previous literatures22,23,26.
Table 1.
cTnI (ng mL−1) | CK-Mb (ng mL−1) | |
---|---|---|
CIA-LODa | 0.0152 | 1.3245 |
CIA-LOQb | 0.0208 | 2.8393 |
CIA-cutoffs | 0.04 | 4.00 |
pGold-LODa | 0.0100 | 0.2715 |
pGold-LOQb | 0.0157 | 1.1348 |
pGold-cutoffs | 0.03 | 3.13 |
aLODs were calculated by applying the mean blank value plus 3 times of s.d. to the fitting line of calibration curves.
bLOQs were calculated by applying the mean blank value plus 10 times of s.d. to the fitting line of calibration curves.
For comparison, the LOD in high-sensitivity cTnI assays was calculated using the following Eqs. (2) and (3):
2 |
3 |
which was also reported in previous literatures34–36.
Notably, the LOD of pGold chip assay was calculated to be 0.0030 ng mL−1 (3 ng L−1) based on the same equation as high-sensitivity cTnI assays (Eq. (2)), comparable to the LOD of current high-sensitivity cTnI assays (1–5 ng L−1). Moreover, the cutoffs of current high-sensitivity cTnI assays are set to be 14–52 ng L−1 (refs. 37–39), even for 0/1h-algorithm or 0/2h-algorithm, according to the guidelines of commercial diagnostic kits and literature reports, to avoid false positives and achieve high diagnostic specificity (>95%). Therefore, the LOD of pGold chip assay (3 ng L−1) is comparable to the LOD of current high-sensitivity cTnI assays (1–5 ng L−1) and sufficient for clinical use considering the recommended cutoffs (14–52 ng L−1).
Sensitivity is fundamentally important for the detection of serum biomarkers for efficient diagnosis of MI, due to the low concentration of biomarkers in the early stages of the disease. Similar results were obtained through NIR-FE detection of creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB, Fig. 2d) on the pGold chips, showing advantages of pGold as a platform technology (Fig. 2e, f, Table 1, Supplementary Table 3). Notably, NIR-FE of cTnI and CK-MB on pGold chips yielded coefficient variation < 15% (Supplementary Tables 4, 5) in the calibration curve for low concentrations (0.01–1.20 ng mL−1 for cTnI and 0.25–64.00 ng mL−1 for CK-MB, Supplementary Tables 1, 3), validating the reproducibility and accuracy of our assay for clinical use.
Diagnosis of MI patients by serum biomarkers
We detected 10 μL of serum samples from 112 MI patients (75 males and 37 females, with median age of 64.39, who were diagnosed with MI and without other major diseases on the basis of symptoms of myocardial ischemia, elevated cardiac biomarker, the electrocardiogram (ECG), and angiography) and 112 healthy controls (81 males and 31 females with median age of 61.66, who were diagnosed without MI and other major diseases) by the pGold chip assay for diagnosis of MI (Supplementary Table 6). Patients/controls known to have other medical conditions (such as active bleeding) were excluded. Both age and gender were matched with p > 0.05 (Supplementary Table 6, according to Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test), between the MI patients and healthy controls.
According to the fluorescence intensity from patients and controls (NIR-FE detection in Fig. 3a, CIA results in Supplementary Fig. 2a), the corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of cTnI were plotted for MI diagnosis (Fig. 3b). The pGold chip assay and CIA afforded AUC of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.950–1.000, p = 2.85 × 10−11) and 0.662 (95% CI: 0.590–0.734, p = 0.000023), respectively, in Table 2. The serum samples were diluted to the same volume (90 μL) by fetal bovine serum (FBS) for both plasmonic sensing platform and conventional approach (CIA), to test these two different methods under the same sample conditions. We used the CIA on the UniCel DxI 800 platform (Beckman Coulter), which is a reported high-sensitivity cTnI assay in clinic use according to current guidelines40 and requires 200 μL of serum for the optimal standard of care use. The decrease of sample volume (10 μL of serum in this work) resulted in the poor performance of the test. We used the same sample volume (10 μL of serum) for both CIA and pGold chip assays, to make a valid comparison.
Table 2.
CIAa | pGoldb | |
---|---|---|
Sensitivity-cTnI | 59.82% | 100% |
Specificity-cTnI | 70.54% | 95.54% |
AUC-cTnIc | 0.662 | 0.976 |
95% CId | 0.590–0.734 | 0.950–1.000 |
p value-cTnIe | 0.000023 | 2.85 × E−11 |
Sensitivity-CK-MB | 24.11% | 86.61% |
Specificity-CK-MB | 98.21% | 66.07% |
AUC-CK-MBc | 0.614 | 0.821 |
95% CId | 0.537–0.692 | 0.786–0.886 |
p value-CK-MBe | 0.000493 | 0.000338 |
aSensitivity and specificity by CIA were obtained at the cutoffs of 0.04 ng mL−1 for cTnI and 4 ng mL−1 for CK-MB.
bSensitivity and specificity by pGold chip were obtained at the lowered cutoffs of 0.03 ng mL−1 for cTnI and 3.13 ng mL−1 for CK-MB.
cAUCs were obtained using the SPSS software (version 19.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago).
dCI was calculated based on the Clopper–Pearson method.
ep-Value was calculated based on the two-sided Student’s t-test.
Superior to CIA with diagnostic sensitivity of 59.82% and specificity of 70.54%, the pGold chip assay afforded markedly improved diagnostic sensitivity of 92.86% and specificity of 97.32%, based on the recommended cutoff concentration by CIA (0.04 ng mL−1 for cTnI, Tables 1, 2)41–43, due to the enhanced LOD and LOQ. Notably, we achieved further enhanced diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95.54%, based on the lowered cutoff concentration by pGold (0.03 ng mL−1 for cTnI, Fig. 3, Tables 1, 2), which is sufficient to be of clinical use and comparable to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved assays for MI (with sensitivity > 95% and AUC > 0.96)44,45. We have also added the results using 200 μL of serum for cTnI detection by CIA (Supplementary Fig. 3, with diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.43% based on the lowered cutoff concentration of 0.03 ng mL−1 for cTnI), as the supporting data for the direct comparison. Also, we used Abbott Architect kit and i2000SR platform (consuming 200 μL of serum), which is a reported high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay according to the current guidelines37,40,46. The hs-cTnI assay (Architect) afforded the diagnostic sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 94.64%, and AUC of 0.994 (95% CI: 0.987–1.000) based on the cutoff concentration of 0.03 ng mL−1 (CIA* in Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4). Therefore, the pGold chip platform achieved high-sensitivity cTnI detection using 10 μL of serum only, compared with CIA using 200 μL of serum. And the diagnostic performances of two assays were comparable. The success can be due to the highly sensitive troponin testing based on the plasmonic platform with NIR-FE detection, which is highly sensitive and accurate even at very low concentrations.
In parallel, the diagnostic performance of CK-MB (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 2b) was studied and the corresponding ROC curves were recorded (Fig. 3d). Limited AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.786–0.886, p = 0.000338, sensitivity of 86.61% and specificity of 66.07%) was obtained for CK-MB using the pGold chip assay superior to CIA with AUC of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.537–0.692, p = 0.000493, sensitivity of 24.11% and specificity of 98.21%), based on the recommended cutoff concentration by CIA (4 ng mL−1 for CK-MB, Tables 1, 2). Still unsatisfactory diagnostic sensitivity of 86.61% and specificity of 66.07% were obtained using the pGold chip assay, based on the lowered cutoff concentration by pGold (3.13 ng mL−1 for CK-MB, Fig. 3, Tables 1, 2), which was consistent with previous literatures47,48 and confirmed the key role of cTnI over CK-MB in the diagnosis of MI. Therefore, it was demonstrated that NIR-FE detection of selected biomarkers (cTnI) by the pGold chip assay achieved high diagnostic capability (AUC of 0.976) with a low sample volume of 10 μL of serum only, in screening of MI toward potential POCT, which is consistent with previous literature and confirms the key role of cTnI in the diagnosis of MI.
The high specificity of >95% referred to the diagnostic specificity, which can be attributed to both the rational selection of biomarker (cTnI for MI patients) and sensitive detection of biomarker (LOD of 0.01 ng mL−1). For selection of biomarker, the cTnI was a better biomarker for MI patients due to the characteristic release of cTnI from myocardial cell to blood, compared with other biomarkers (e.g., CK-MB), according to literature reports47,48. For detection of biomarker, sensitive detection of cTnI with LOD of 0.01 ng mL−1 may lead to the clear differentiation between early MI patients with higher cTnI concentrations and healthy controls with lower cTnI concentrations49,50, superior to other platforms (e.g., glass chips and sGold chips) with lower detection sensitivity. Therefore, we identified healthy controls with lower cTnI concentrations at high confidence (specificity of >95%) by the rational selection and sensitive detection of the biomarker.
Speed and multiplexity of pGold chip assay
Considering emergencies in real case calling for fast diagnosis of MI, the speed of the pGold chip assay was investigated. NIR-FE detection of cTnI was performed at low concentrations of 0.01–0.08 ng mL−1 (Fig. 4a), with controlled overall immuno-reaction time of 150/60/30 min on-chip. The corresponding calibration curves displayed reduced NIR fluorescence intensities by 15–50% (Fig. 4b). Notably, the LOD and LOQ reached 0.0152 and 0.0331 ng mL−1, based on 30 min immuno-reaction on chip (Supplementary Table 7). It has been anticipated that with further instrumentation and automation, our pGold chip assay can engage the requirement for the diagnosis of MI in a much shorter time for emergencies.
Also, multiplex detection of biomarkers was conducted on the pGold chips. Capture antibodies for cTnI and CK-MB were applied in a 3 × 2 spot matrix format with each row containing one type of capture antibodies. For specificity tests, we implemented one detection antibody for biomarkers with different concentrations (0.3–1.2 ng mL−1 for cTnI, 4.0–64.0 ng mL−1 for CK-MB) and observed bright fluorescent spots in the target row only (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 5a). Averaged fluorescence intensities of spots in each row were summarized in Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 5b. These data demonstrated the capability of pGold chip assay to carry out multiplex biomarker analysis.
Post-operative monitoring of MI patients after PCI
Further, the serum concentrations of cTnI were monitored to check the health conditions of MI patients after PCI (Fig. 5). A cohort of 25 MI patients (19 males and 6 females) were analyzed with a median age of 68 (41–92). For past medical history, 5 patients had high blood pressure, 14 patients had no related diseases, and 6 patients had MI within recent 3 years (Supplementary Table 8). Three blood samples per patient were collected and monitored including one blood sample before PCI and two blood samples within 10 days (one on day 5 and the other on day 10) after PCI. Specifically, it was found that serum concentrations of cTnI gradually decreased for the subsequent two tests after PCI for MI patients (p < 0.05), compared with levels of cTnI before PCI (p < 0.0001). The gradual decrease of cTnI concentrations can be obtained in serum for all the 25 patients in three consecutive tests for short-term (10 days) outcome assessment that would be relevant to long-term (from 3 months to 8 years) morbidity and mortality for potential prognostic use51–54.
PCI with around millions of cases per year (known as a preferred method of myocardial revascularization), is a commonly used technique for treating MI55. Notably, monitoring of PCI is crucial and decides the life quality for MI patients, while the cTnI level in serum serves as the main indicator in clinics. Considering the key role of cTnI and application benefit of our assay, the pGold chip assay may help to address the technical challenges and application needs dealing with MI from a clinical perspective, toward efficient detection and monitoring of MI in daily life.
To better put our findings into perspective, we included a small cohort of 10 patients (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 9) presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department of Shanghai Chest Hospital (intended use Population) and adjudicated the final diagnosis according to the universal definition using serial measurements of cTnI by pGold. In monitoring of cTnI, five patients (No. 1–5) with acute chest pain showed a significant elevation (≥20%, according to the literature)56,57 between two consecutive time points (0 h/1 h and 0 h/3 h), who were diagnosed with MI (in conjunction with clinical history, physical examination, and ECG) and required intervention treatment. For comparison, another five patients (No. 6–10) with acute chest pain showed no significant elevation between two consecutive time points (0 h/1 h and 0 h/3 h), who were diagnosed without MI (in conjunction with clinical history, physical examination, and ECG) and required no intervention treatment.
Our approach is different from previous reports owing to two major aspects, including disease diagnostics and application design. For disease diagnosis, we reported the assay based on plasmonic nanochips for diagnosis of myocardial infarction, distinct from previous reports using the similar plasmonic platform, such as diagnosis of type I child diabetes23 and Zika virus infection26. For application design, this work contained the analytical features (compared with previous reports)58,59 as tailored, including multi-functions (monitoring for prognostic use) in clinics, selection of specific biomarkers (cTnI and CK-MB), and low sample consumption in high speed (10 μL of serum for 30 min reaction). In addition, our plasmonic gold nano-island platform afforded enhancement factors of ~130-fold, compared with the typical literatures58,59 with optimized enhancement factors of 50-fold and 99-fold using plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Therefore, our approach addressed the application needs and technical challenges from a clinical perspective, different from typical literatures58,59 on sensing mechanism and device structure using plasmonic nanostructures to enhance the fluorescence of dyes from pure chemical/physical perspective.
In summary, we introduced pGold chips as a platform in the management of MI. Our approach featured for (1) quantitation of selected biomarkers (e.g., cTnI) at low concentrations down to 0.01 ng mL−1; (2) capability for detection of trace serum samples (10 μL) toward POCT; (3) diagnosis of MI with the optimized sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95.54%; and (4) desirable speed and multiplexity for diagnostics and monitoring for prognostic use. This work contributed to the design of materials/device based POCT and the development of precision medicine for diverse diseases with tailored characteristics in near future.
Methods
Preparation of chips
Three types of chips were used, including glass chips, sputtered gold (sGold) chips, and plasmonic gold nano-island (pGold) chips. Glass chips with epoxy group were obtained from CapitalBio Company, China. pGold chips with gold nano-islands were obtained from Nirmidas Biotech Inc. and sGold chips were prepared by the magnetic sputtering method28. Glass slides were sputtered with gold using a magnetic control sputtering coater (GSL-1100X-SPC-16M) from Shenyang Kejing Auto-instrument Co., Ltd, China. Sputtering process was carried out at 40 mA current for 4 min under vacuum. Gold plate (99.99%) for sputtering was ordered from Shanghai Daheng Optical Precision Machinery CO., LTD. Glass slides were immersed in chloroauric acid solution at the concentration of 3 × 10−3 M. NH4OH was added by the volume ratio of 1:50 with rapid shaking for 1 min and immerged into deionized water for washing. Then slides were put into sodium borohydride solution at a concentration of 1 × 10−3 M for 1 min and washed with deionized water again. Finally, the slides were shifted to chloroauric acid solution and hydroxylamine solution at the mole ratio of 1:1 for 5 min of shaking and 10 min of incubation. Slides were dried after washing and stored in a sealable container.
Construction of device
Device was built in a manner for easy assembling. FAST frame slide holder and incubation chamber were ordered from Grace Bio-Labs, America. First, the chip was embedded into the incubation chamber and divided into 16 independent reaction wells. Then installed chip was loaded into FAST frame slide holder along two side grooves. The assembled device can be used to conduct immunoassays.
Microarray printing
Nano-Plotter TM 2.1 (GeSim Co., Germany) was applied to immobilize the capture antibodies on the chips (including glass, sGold, and pGold chips). Chips with immobilized antibodies were prepared by the non-contact micro-dispensing method. Capture antibodies were diluted with 1 × phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) to the concentration of 3 μM. Then capture antibodies were printed in triplicate with each spot volume of 3 nL by running the designed printing program. The diameter of each spot was about 400 μm. The chip was placed at 4 °C before use.
Characterization
For characterizations of chips, the extinction spectra of various chips were recorded with a UV1900 UV-Vis spectrometer (Aucybest, China). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were acquired on Hitachi S-4800 with field emission gun (FEG) source at acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV. Digital images were recorded by iPhone 7.
Antibody labeling by IRDye800
Detection antibodies were labeled with IRDye800 though 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC-NHS) conjugation. Illustra NAP-5 columns were ordered from GE Healthcare and IRDye 800CW N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester was purchased from LI-COR Biosciences. IRDye 800CW NHS ester was diluted with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and detection antibody was mixed at the mole ratio of 1:4 and shaking for 1.5 h in the dark. First, 10 mL of 1 × PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) was added into the column. Then the mixture was added with 1 × PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) to make the total volume of 500 μL after dripping. Finally, IRDye800 labeled detection antibody solution was collected with 500 μL of 1 × PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) and stored at −20 °C in dark before use.
Harvest of serum samples
All of the investigation protocols in this study were approved by the institutional ethics committees of the Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Reference No. KS(P)1703). All serum samples detected in the experiment were collected in Shanghai Chest Hospital according to the established protocol60. Three milliliters of blood was drawn to a serum tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. Aliquots of supernatant were collected and stored at −20 °C before use.
Immunoassay on chip
A sandwich structure was applied to detect serum biomarkers. Capture antibodies for cTnI (cat. # 14T21, mAb: M18)/CK-MB (mAb: 1C11), Detection antibodies for cTnI (cat. # 14T21, mAb: 19C7)/CK-MB (mAb: 1D10), and calibration materials for cTnI/CK-MB were obtained from Shanghai Tellgen Life Science Company. Printed chips (including glass, sGold, and pGold chips) were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution (diluted with 1 × PBS buffer containing 0.05% tween-20) for 1 h shaking to reduce non-specific binding. Then, 150 μL of 1 × PBS buffer containing 0.05% tween-20 (PBST) was used to wash each reaction well. For calibration curves detection, calibration samples containing known concentrations of cTnI and CK-MB were diluted in pure water as the kit (Tellgen) suggested to a certain concentration. For serum samples detection, 10 μL of human serum was diluted into 90 μL of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) solution. Hundred microliters of solution from calibration sample and serum sample were added in each reaction well for 120 min of shaking at room temperature. After washing with PBST for five times, the chip was then stained IRDye800 labeled antibodies for anti-cTnI and anti-CK-MB at a concentration of 10 × 10−9 M for 30 min shaking in the dark. Obtained chips were washed three times by PBST. Hundred microliters of PBST and PBS were added into each reaction well for 15 min and 5 min shaking in the dark, subsequently. The chips were finally washed with deionized water and dried with compressed air before scanning.
NIR fluorescence measurement
The chips were scanned by InnoScan 710-IR microarray scanner using the 785 nm channel with a resolution of 10 μm per pixel. A 16-bit grayscale image can be exported after scanning. Then images were analyzed by Image Studio Version 3.1.4. Spot features were automatically identified by the program and then manually defined22. The intensity of each feature was calculated as the total signal divided by the area. The mean intensity of the three spots was used for quantitation.
Chemiluminescence immunoassay
Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) was conducted on the UniCel DxI 800 (Beckman Coulter Inc.) using both 200 μL (for the standard of care) and 10 μL of serum. The CIA on the UniCel DxI 800 platform (Beckman Coulter) is a reported high-sensitivity cTnI assay in clinic use61–63 and requires 200 μL of serum for the optimal standard of care use to make the clinical diagnosis. Also, CIA based on one high-sensitivity cTnI assay (as recommended in the current guidelines37,40,46) was conducted using Abbott Architect kit (Abbott Architect STAT high-sensitivity cTnI reagent kit) and i2000SR platform (consuming 200 μL of serum). For calibration curves, standard samples (containing known concentrations of cTnI/CK-MB) were re-dissolved by pure water. In serum analysis, 10 μL of human serum was diluted into 90 μL of 10% FBS solution (same as the gGold chip assay). Standard or serum samples were mixed with detection antibody for cTnI/CK-MB (conjugated with alkaline phosphatase) in a surfactant-containing buffer. Then magnetic particles with capture antibodies were added. After incubation, magnetic particles were collected to measure the fluorescence based on the chemiluminescent substrate Lumi-Phos* 530 for quantitation.
LODs, LOQs, and cutoffs
LODs and LOQs were calculated for cTnI and CK-MB, according to the calibration curves by the pGold chips and CIA. The linear fitting equation of each calibration curve of two platforms was computed by OriginPro 8. LOD was measured as the mean blank value plus 3 times of s.d. and LOQ was measured as the mean blank value plus 10 times of s.d. The intensity cutoffs were corresponding to serum concentrations of 0.04 ng mL−1 (recommended cutoff by CIA) and 0.03 ng mL−1 (lowered cutoff by pGold) for cTnI, 4 ng mL−1 (recommended cutoff by CIA) and 3.13 ng mL−1 (lowered cutoff by pGold) for CK-MB.
Diagnostic and monitoring experiments
Myocardial infarction (MI) was defined as pathologically as the death of myocardial cell due to the prolonged ischaemia57, which can be diagnosed on the basis of the 99th percentile of cTnI, clinical manifestation, ECG, and angiography according to the literature reports40,57. A case-control design was used and the 99th percentile of cTnI can be obtained using controls. The blood samples were obtained during an early screening of initial MI patients with chest pain and without treatment, who were later diagnosed with MI on the basis of the 99th percentile of cTnI, clinical manifestation, ECG, and angiography40,57. The cTnI concentration representing the 99th percentile of the overall study population was 0.036 ng mL−1 (36 ng L−1), consistent with the cutoffs of the current high-sensitivity cTnI assays (14–52 ng L−1). An elevation above the 99th percentile of cTnI is a mandatory criteria for the diagnosis of MI in vivo.
Typically, MI patients in China would first take blood tests for early screening purpose, then have coronary angiography for validation and potential percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), according to the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization as reported64,65. For diagnostic application, MI serum samples were from 112 MI patients (75 males and 37 females) with a median age of 64.39, who were diagnosed without malignant tumor, autoimmune disorders, severe infectious diseases, trauma, heart diseases, and other major diseases. Control serum samples were collected from 112 healthy controls (81 males and 31 females) with a median age of 61.66, who were diagnosed without MI and other major diseases. Patients/controls known to have other medical conditions (such as active bleeding) were excluded. Both age and gender were matched with p > 0.05 (according to Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test), between the MI patients and healthy controls.
For monitoring application, a cohort of 25 MI patients (19 males and 6 females) were analyzed with a median age of 68 (41–92). For past medical history, 5 patients had high blood pressure, 14 patients had no related diseases, and 6 patients had MI within recent 3 years. Three blood samples per patient were collected and monitored including one blood sample before PCI and two blood samples within 10 days (one on day 5 and the other on day 10) after PCI. Monitoring concentrations of cTnI after PCI can be critical in short-term (10 days in this work) outcome assessment that would be relevant to long-term (from 3 months to 8 years) morbidity and mortality according to literature reports51–54. Also, a small cohort of 10 patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department of Shanghai Chest Hospital (intended use Population) was added and the final diagnosis was adjudicated according to the universal definition using serial measurements.
Control of reaction time
Reaction time of immunoassay was controlled to be 150, 60, and 30 min on pGold chips, including the capture and detection steps. Specifically, in the capture step, calibration samples containing known concentrations of cTnI (0.08, 0.02, and 0.01 ng mL−1) were incubated for 120, 40, and 20 min, individually. In the detection step, antibody staining (by 2 nM IRDye800 labeled detection antibodies) time was set to be 30, 20, and 10 min, individually.
Cross reactivity tests
The procedure was the same with standards or serum detection on pGold chips except for the detection step. Calibration samples containing a mixture of cTnI (0.3–1.2 ng mL−1) and CK-MB (4.0–64.0 ng mL−1) were applied to the pGold chips. In the detection step, one group of wells was added with only one IRDye800 labeled antibody, another group of wells added with the other antibody instead.
Statistical analysis
Coefficient variation was calculated as standard deviation divided by mean intensity. Positive cases among patient samples and negative cases among control samples were used to calculate the sensitivity (as true positive/(true positive + false negative)) and specificity (as true negative/(true negative + false positive)). Statistical Product and Service Solutions 19 (SPSS 19.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago) was used to plot and analyze the ROC curve. The CI and p-value were calculated using the SPSS software based on the Clopper–Pearson method, Fisher’s exact test, unpaired Student’s t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test66–69.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank the financial support from Project 81771983, 81971771, 81750410695, 81750110544, 81650110523, 81851110764, and 61425006 by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), Project 16441909300 by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, Project YS2017YFGH002082, 2017YFC0909000 by Ministry of Science and Technology of China. This work is also sponsored by Shanghai Rising-Star Program (19QA1404800), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (16CR2011A), and Innovation Group Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2019CXJQ03).
Source Data
Author contributions
K.Q. and J.L. foresaw this work and designed the overall approach. W.X. and L.W. contributed equally. W.X., L.W., and R.Z. carried out experiments and wrote the paper. X.S., L.H., H.S., C.C., X.W., J.L., and H.D. contributed to the data analysis. All authors joined in the critical discussion and edited the paper.
Data availability
The datasets obtained and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The source data for Figs. 1b, 2b, c, e, f, 3a, c, 4b, d, and 5, and Supplementary Figs. 2a, b, 3, 4, 5b, and 6 were provided as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing interests. H.D. is a scientific adviser for Nirmidas Biotech Inc. and contributed to this work in that capacity. The authors declare no other competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Christian Mueller and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Jiatao Lou, Email: loujiatao@shchest.org.
Kun Qian, Email: k.qian@sjtu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-15487-3.
References
- 1.Mendis, S., Puska, P. & Norrving, B. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control (WHO, 2011).
- 2.Reiner Z. Hypertriglyceridaemia and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017;14:401–411. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prabhakaran D, et al. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders: key messages from disease control priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2018;391:1224–1236. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32471-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roth GA, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017;70:1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sacks FM, et al. Dietary fats and cardiovascular disease: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e1–e23. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Braunwald E. The war against heart failure: the Lancet lecture. Lancet. 2015;385:812–824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61889-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jansen F, Nickenig G, Werner N. Extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular disease: potential applications in diagnosis, prognosis, and epidemiology. Circ. Res. 2017;120:1649–1657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cohen JD, et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science. 2018;359:926–930. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakamura A, et al. High performance plasma amyloid-beta biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2018;554:249–254. doi: 10.1038/nature25456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wei M, et al. Fasting-mimicking diet and markers/risk factors for aging, diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;9:377–388. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chaudhury A, Noiret L, Higgins JM. White blood cell population dynamics for risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:12344–12349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1709228114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu C, et al. Quantification of circulating mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen peptides allows rapid diagnosis of active disease and treatment monitoring. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:3969–3974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621360114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ngo TTM, et al. Noninvasive blood tests for fetal development predict gestational age and preterm delivery. Science. 2018;360:1133–1136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Su H, et al. Janus particles: design, preparation, and biomedical applications. Mater. Today Bio. 2019;4:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vedarethinam V, et al. Detection and inhibition of bacteria on a dual-functional silver platform. Small. 2019;15:1803051. doi: 10.1002/smll.201803051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang L, et al. A multifunctional platinum nanoreactor for point-of-care metabolic analysis. Matter. 2019;1:1669–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hong G, Antaris AL, Dai H. Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging. Nat. Bio. Eng. 2017;1:0010. doi: 10.1038/s41551-016-0010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shu, W. et al. Construction of a plasmonic chip for metabolic analysis in cervical cancer screening and evaluation. Small Methods. 10.1002/smtd.201900469 (2019).
- 20.Zhang R, et al. Magnetic “squashing” of circulating tumor cells on plasmonic substrates for ultrasensitive NIR fluorescence detection. Small Methods. 2019;3:1800474. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800474. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tabakman SM, et al. Plasmonic substrates for multiplexed protein microarrays with femtomolar sensitivity and broad dynamic range. Nat. Commun. 2011;2:466. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu B, et al. High performance, multiplexed lung cancer biomarker detection on a plasmonic gold chip. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:7994–8002. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201603547. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang B, Kumar RB, Dai H, Feldman BJ. A plasmonic chip for biomarker discovery and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Med. 2014;20:948–953. doi: 10.1038/nm.3619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wan H, et al. Proteoliposome-based full-length ZnT8 self-antigen for type 1 diabetes diagnosis on a plasmonic platform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10196–10201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711169114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li X, et al. Autoantibody profiling on a plasmonic nano-gold chip for the early detection of hypertensive heart disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:7089–7094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621457114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang B, et al. Diagnosis of Zika virus infection on a nanotechnology platform. Nat. Med. 2017;23:548–550. doi: 10.1038/nm.4302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guidelli EJ, Ramos AP, Baffa O. Enhancing and quenching luminescence with gold nanoparticle films: the influence of substrate on the luminescent properties. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:015503. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/1/015503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun X, et al. Metabolic fingerprinting on a plasmonic gold chip for mass spectrometry based in vitro diagnostics. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018;4:223–229. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Caldarola M, et al. Non-plasmonic nanoantennas for surface enhanced spectroscopies with ultra-low heat conversion. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7915. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu X, Zhou J, Zhou S, Yue Y, Qiu J. Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018;97:38–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peng X, et al. A nonfluorescent, broad-range quencher dye for Förster resonance energy transfer assays. Anal. Biochem. 2009;388:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mayilo S, et al. Long-range fluorescence quenching by gold nanoparticles in a sandwich immunoassay for cardiac troponin T. Nano Lett. 2009;9:4558–4563. doi: 10.1021/nl903178n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xue C, Xue Y, Dai L, Urbas A, Li Q. Size- and shape-dependent fluorescence quenching of gold nanoparticles on perylene dye. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2013;1:581–587. doi: 10.1002/adom.201300175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2008;29:S49–S52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boeckel JN, et al. Estimation of values below the limit of detection of a contemporary sensitive troponin I assay improves diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin. Chem. 2015;61:1197–1206. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.238949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lippi G, et al. Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017;56:157–161. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ungerer JPJ, Tate JR, Pretorius CJ. Discordance with 3 cardiac troponin I and T assays: implications for the 99th percentile cutoff. Clin. Chem. 2016;62:1106–1114. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Badertscher P, et al. Effect of acute coronary syndrome probability on diagnostic and prognostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Clin. Chem. 2018;64:515–525. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.279513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gimenez MR, et al. Impact of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved sex-specific cutoff values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T to diagnose myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018;137:1867–1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roffi M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2016;37:267–315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Keller T, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:868–877. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keller T, et al. Defining a reference population to determine the 99th percentile of a contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin I assay. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;167:1423–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shah ASV, et al. High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392:919–928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31923-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reichlin T, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:858–867. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Giménez MR, et al. Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;168:3896–3901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Love SA, et al. Incidence of undetectable, measurable, and increased cardiac troponin I concentrations above the 99th percentile using a high-sensitivity vs a contemporary assay in patients presenting to the emergency department. Clin. Chem. 2016;62:1115–1119. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.256305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chiara AD, et al. Predictive value of cardiac troponin-I compared to creatine kinase-myocardial band for the assessment of infarct size as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2010;11:587–592. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283383153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Søraas CL, et al. Troponin T is a better predictor than creatine kinase-MB of long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am. Heart J. 2012;164:779–785. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Neumann JT, et al. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity troponin I 1-hour algorithm. JAMA Cardio. 2016;1:397–404. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Boeddinghaus J, et al. Two-hour algorithm for triage toward rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction by use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Clin. Chem. 2016;62:494–504. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.249508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kizer JR, et al. Role of cardiac troponin T in the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur. Heart J. 2003;24:1314–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00258-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tricoci P, et al. Cardiac troponin after percutaneous coronary intervention and 1-year mortality in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome using systematic evaluation of biomarker trends. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013;62:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hall TS, et al. Cardiac troponin I for prediction of clinical outcomes and cardiac function through 3-month follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J. 2015;169:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ndrepepa G, et al. Markers of reperfusion and long-term (8-year) prognosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2018;122:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shah RU, et al. Increasing percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: progress and opportunity. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015;8:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang Y, et al. Chinese experts’ consensus on the clinical application of cTnI. Chin. J. Inter. Med. 2015;54:899–904. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thygesen K, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;72:2231–2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chekini M, et al. Fluorescence enhancement in large-scale self-assembled gold nanoparticle double arrays. J. Appl. Phys. 2015;118:233107. doi: 10.1063/1.4938025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bardhan R, Grady NK, Halas NJ. Nanoscale control of near-infrared fluorescence enhancement using Au nanoshells. Small. 2008;4:1716–1722. doi: 10.1002/smll.200800405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu J, et al. Multifunctional magnetic particles for combined circulating tumor cells isolation and cellular metabolism detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:4016–4025. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kavsak PA, Malinowski P, Roy C, Clark L, Lamers S. Assessing matrix, interferences and comparability between the Abbott Diagnostics and the Beckman Coulter high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018;56:1176–1181. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Masotti S, et al. Evaluation of analytical performance of a new high-sensitivity immunoassay for cardiac troponin I. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018;56:492–501. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Clericoa A, et al. Evaluation of 99th percentile and reference change values of a high-sensitivity cTnI method: a multicenter study. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2019;493:156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Patel MR, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017;69:2212–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Desai NR, et al. Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization and trends in utilization,patient selection, and appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2015;314:2045–2053. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Norton ME, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1589–1597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Evans CP, et al. The PREVAIL study: primary outcomes by site and extent of baseline disease for enzalutamide-treated men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:675–683. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Huang L, et al. Plasmonic silver nanoshells for drug and metabolite detection. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:220. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00220-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Meldi K, et al. Specific molecular signatures predict decitabine response in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:1857–1872. doi: 10.1172/JCI78752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets obtained and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The source data for Figs. 1b, 2b, c, e, f, 3a, c, 4b, d, and 5, and Supplementary Figs. 2a, b, 3, 4, 5b, and 6 were provided as a Source Data file.