Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 21;19(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.10.010

Table 2.

Activity of Sinupret ® preparations (oral drops and dry extract) against DNA and RNA viruses.

Virus Virus assay Cell culture Oral drops
Dry extract
p
EC50 (μg/ml)
RNA-virus (enveloped)
Influenza A, Chile 1/83 (H1N1) virus (FluA) PFU MDCK >120 124.8a n.c.
Porcine Influenza A/California/07/2009 (pFluA) PFU MDCK n.t. 43.4a n.c.
Parainfluenza type 3 virus (Para 3) PFU MDCK >120 >100 n.c.
Respiratory syncytial virus, strain long (RSV) PFU
ELISA
HEp-2 20.7
34.0
10.4
21.0
<0.001
<0.001
RNA-virus (non-enveloped)
Rhinovirus B subtype 14 (HRV 14) PFU HeLa 73.1 50.5 >0.05
Coxsackievirus subtype A9 (CA9) PFU BGM 86.6 >100 n.c.
DNA-virus (non-enveloped)
Adenovirus C subtype 5 (Adeno 5) CPE
ELISA
HEp-2 66.4
40.6
13.8
10.0
<0.001
<0.001

EC50, concentration that inhibits the viral acitivity by 50%; n.c., not calculated (Inhibition in the maximum concentration for at least one preparation lower than 50%); n.t., not tested; p, significance (dry extract vs. oral drops).

Relative to virus addition to cells different concentrations of Sinupret® were added 1 h after infection and left on throughout the incubation period. The antiviral activity was determined in plaque-reduction assays (PFU) for FluA, pFluA, Para 3, RSV, HRV 14 and CA9 or with the analyses of a cytopathogenic effect (CPE) for Adeno 5. In addition for RSV and Adeno 5 data were ascertained by ELISA. The relative inhibition by Sinupret® was standardised by the virus control representing 100% infectivity (0% inhibition). The table shows the concentration-dependent anti-viral effect of Sinupret® by using a therapeutic protocol calculated as a 50% effective concentration (EC50). All data are based on means of two (Adeno 5 CPE, RSV PFU, pFluA, repetition of FluA) or three (FLuA, Para 3, HRV 14, CA9, Adeno 5 ELISA and RSV ELISA) replicates derived from two independent experiments.

a

Additional test with higher concentrations of dry extract used.