Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2018 Sep 4;47(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31226-8

Pathogenicity of experimental infection with ‘pneumotropic’ porcine coronavirus

D O’TOOLE 1, I BROWN 1, A BRIDGES 1, SF CARTWRIGHT 1
PMCID: PMC7125977  PMID: 2549594

Abstract

Virus localisation and lesions were studied in 14 one-week-old piglets following combined intranasal-oral inoculation with a British isolate of ‘pneumotropic’ porcine coronavirus (pcv) and were compared with the effects of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (tgev) infection in five piglets. Unlike TGEV-infected piglets, all pcv-inoculated piglets remained clinically healthy. Seroconversion was detected at seven days after inoculation. Mild bronchointerstitial pneumonia involving terminal airways was consistently present at two days after infection and thereafter. Both pcv and tgev infected bronchiolar epithelium and alveolar macrophages but, unlike tgev, replication by pcv in villous enterocytes was limited and did not cause villous atrophy.

References

  1. BASKERVILLE A. Research in Veterinary Science. 1970;11:150–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CASTLEMAN W.L., LAY J.C., DUBOVI E.J., SLAUSON D.O. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1985;46:547–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHU R.M., LI N.-J., GLOCK R.D., ROSS R.F. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1982;43:77–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FURUUCHI S., SHIMIZU Y., KUMAGAI T. Veterinary Microbiology. 1979;3:169–178. [Google Scholar]
  5. GARWES D.J., STEWART F., CARTWRIGHT S.F., BROWN I. Veterinary Record. 1988;122:86–87. doi: 10.1136/vr.122.4.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GOODWIN R.F.W., JENNINGS A.R. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics. 1959;69:87–97. doi: 10.1016/s0368-1742(59)80008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. JESTIN A., LEFORBAN Y., VANNIER P. Recueil de Médecine Vétérinaire. 1987;163:583–588. [Google Scholar]
  8. LAUDE H., CHARLEY B., GELFI J. Journal of General Virology. 1984;65:327–332. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-65-2-327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MOCSARI E., HORVATH I. Acta Veterinaria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1980;28:257–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PENSAERT M., HAELTERMAN E.O., BURNSTEIN T. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung. 1970;31:321–334. doi: 10.1007/BF01253767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. PENSAERT M., CALLEBAUT P., VERGOTE J. Veterinary Quarterly. 1986;8:257–261. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1986.9694050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. TAVERNOR W.D., TREXLER P.C., VAUGHAN L.C., COX J.E., JONES D.G.C. Veterinary Record. 1971;88:10–14. doi: 10.1136/vr.88.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. UNDERDAHL N.R., MEBUS C.A., STAIR E.L., RHODES M.B., McGILL L.D., TWIEHAUS M.J. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1974;35:1209–1216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VETERINARY INVESTIGATION SERVICE. Veterinary Record. 1987;120:588. [Google Scholar]
  15. WAGNER J.E., BEAMER P.D., RISTIC M. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine. 1973;37:177–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WITTE K.H. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung. 1971;33:171–176. doi: 10.1007/BF01254174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Research in Veterinary Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES