Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2020 Mar 11;287(1922):20200195. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0195

Sex-specific impact of inbreeding on pathogen load in the striped dolphin

Georgios A Gkafas 1,2, Menno de Jong 1, Athanasios Exadactylos 2, Juan Antonio Raga 3, Francisco J Aznar 3, A Rus Hoelzel 1,
PMCID: PMC7126063  PMID: 32156218

Abstract

The impact of inbreeding on fitness has been widely studied and provides consequential inference about adaptive potential and the impact on survival for reduced and fragmented natural populations. Correlations between heterozygosity and fitness are common in the literature, but they rarely inform about the likely mechanisms. Here, we investigate a pathology with a clear impact on health in striped dolphin hosts (a nematode infection that compromises lung function). Dolphins varied with respect to their parasite burden of this highly pathogenic lung nematode (Skrjabinalius guevarai). Genetic diversity revealed by high-resolution restriction-associated DNA (43 018 RADseq single nucleotide polymorphisms) analyses showed a clear association between heterozygosity and pathogen load, but only for female dolphins, for which the more heterozygous individuals had lower Sk. guevarai burden. One locus identified by RADseq was a strong outlier in association with parasite load (heterozygous in all uninfected females, homozygous for 94% of infected females), found in an intron of the citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase locus (associated with milk production in mammals). Allelic variation at the Class II major histocompatability complex DQB locus was also assessed and found to be associated with both regional variation and with pathogen load. Both sex specificity and the identification of associating functional loci provide insight into the mechanisms by which more inbred individuals may be more susceptible to the infection of this parasite. This provides important insight towards our understanding of the impact of inbreeding in natural populations, relevant to both evolutionary and practical conservation considerations.

Keywords: heterozygosity, fitness, evolution, cetacean, genomic

1. Introduction

Genetic diversity affects both short-term individual fitness and long-term population adaptive potential, and these factors are inter-dependent. Populations need to retain diversity to respond to new selection pressures in a changing environment, including pathogen challenges, which may, in turn, be affected by environmental changes. A relationship between diversity and fitness has been shown in small populations where susceptibility to pathogens can be promoted by the loss of heterozygosity owing to both inbreeding and genetic drift (e.g. [1]). In fact, this relationship holds for a broad range of population sizes, and there have been many studies reporting heterozygosity-fitness correlations (HFCs; see reviews in [2,3]) and assessments of the most effective measures of inbreeding to identify these correlations (see [3]). Many earlier studies used microsatellite DNA markers, but more recent studies demonstrate that the greater power availed by genome sampling reveals patterns that may otherwise have been missed (e.g. [46]). The double digest restriction-associated DNA (ddRADseq; [7]) method employed here screens across the genome at thousands of loci.

A positive correlation could be associated with a particular locus, loci in linkage disequilibrium with the marker loci, or it may reflect a more general pattern of inbreeding across the genome (see [8]). In a study on Galapagos sea lions (Zalophus wollebaeki), the relative importance of genome-wide effects compared to specific loci (in that case the major histocompatibility complex ‘MHC’ loci) was investigated [9]. The authors controlled for genome-wide inbreeding to test the influence of the MHC DRB locus and found strong associations between DRB diversity and all tested fitness traits (which included birth mass, pup survival and female reproductive success), indicating that single-locus effects can be important. At the same time, from a review of the literature, Szulkin et al. [10] concluded that HFC can most often be explained by inbreeding, which affects the whole genome.

Evidence for balancing selection at MHC loci to retain diversity is extensive, and defence against pathogens is the likely driver (e.g. [11]). This is known to be an important factor in marine species, including cetaceans [12,13]. Diversity at these loci may also be promoted by sexual selection, based on the evidence that females in some species select mates based on their MHC genotype [14,15]. Vassilakos et al. [13] found evidence for regional variation in the charge structure of the peptide-binding region of the MHC DQB locus (among the ‘pocket 4’ residues that influence T-cell recognition; after [16]) for two species of cetacean (Orcinus orca and Tursiops truncatus), which may imply fitness variation among populations associated with local adaptation.

Here, we study inbreeding in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) with variable burdens of the parasitic lungworm, Skrjabinalius guevarai. Lungworm nematodes are common in the delphinid respiratory system [17], and this species of lungworm can cause almost total occlusion of bronchi and bronchioles [18,19]), thereby imposing a significant impact on health. We test the hypothesis that there will be a correlation between genome-wide measures of heterozygosity and pathogen load, but also look for strong effects at single loci (from a genome scan), and at exon-2 of the MHC DQB locus, including pocket 4 charge properties in the peptide-binding region (see [13]). Given the potential for a differential impact of parasite load on males and females (e.g. associated with the added energetic requirements of females during pregnancy), we also test the hypothesis that the relationship between parasite load and inbreeding will differ between males and females.

2. Material and methods

(a). Samples and sex identification

Eighty-four striped dolphins from the western Mediterranean Sea (near Valencia, Spain) were collected as stranded animals between1990 and 2008 (see the electronic supplementary material, table S1). Of these, 51 were collected during periods of morbillivirus epizootics [20] and 33 were outside those time periods. Morbillivirus infection was not confirmed for the samples collected during the epizootics and used in this study. Dolphins were transferred to the laboratory where necropsy and anatomical analyses were carried out immediately (following the protocols of [21]) or alternatively stored at −20°C for later analysis. Sex was identified visually or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on DNA extracted using standard protocols (see [22]) using the primers P15EZ, P23EZ for the Zfx/Zfy gene (after [23]) or Y53-3c and Y53-3d for the SRY gene [24]. We considered dolphins longer than 160 cm to be at least several years old (after [25]). There were 8 out of 68 for the ddRAD analyses and 16 out of 80 for the MHC analyses that were shorter than 160 cm. In case parasite load is associated with age (e.g. owing to accumulation with time or the nature of infection), we repeated all analyses excluding the younger dolphins. All results that had been significant for the full dataset remained significant (data not shown).

(b). Parasite analysis

Lungs were removed for parasite analysis and each lung was weighed to the closest milligram. The lung was always opened starting from the main bronchus of the upper lobe which is connected to the trachea, and then the duct of each bronchioles and alveoli was followed through to the end of the bottom lobe (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Only whole parasites or the parasites' tail were collected and then stored in saline buffer to maintain a constant pH and isotonic environment [26]. After cleaning with the isotonic buffer, parasites from each lung were preserved in 70% alcohol. After gross examination, the lungs were washed out on a 0.2 mm sifter and any parasites (whole or tails) obtained were collected. All parasites were examined in a stereoscope for species identification. Furthermore, 10% of the total number of parasites were prepared and screened under a microscope to ensure the consistency of species identification. A Petri dish with divided areas was used for the parasite counting. Parasites of each lung were combined for the total individual lung-parasite burden.

There was a relatively low number of worms (1–20; for both lungs combined) for some infected individuals, and visual examination indicated that this number of worms was not sufficient to occlude the bronchioles or alveoli. At the same time, a medium or high level of infestation resulted in obvious occlusions. This may suggest a threshold value above which an impact may begin to be seen. For this reason, analyses included the comparison of two infestation categories; none/low infection (0–20 parasites) and medium/high (greater than 20 parasites) infection. However, it is possible that pathology is also or primarily related to secondary bacterial infections, though we have no data on this for these animals. For example, Torynurus convolutus and Pseudalius inflexus lung infestation led to secondary bacterial infections responsible for mortality of North and Baltic Sea harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena; [27])]. Therefore, we also consider the comparison between lungworm infected and uninfected dolphins.

(c). Genomic analyses

We constructed a DNA library of 84 samples (7 pools of 12 samples each) following the ddRADseq protocol described in [7]. We chose a 6 bp cutter (HindIII) and a 4 bp cutter (MspI) based on in silico simulations with the R package SimRAD [28]. The fragment size selection window was 250–350 bp with a size range of 100 bp (selected using a Sage Science PippinPrep). Sequencing was paired end (2X 125 bp) in one lane on an Illumina HiSeq_2500 (v. 4 chemistry). Reads were trimmed to 110 bp and demultiplexed using the process_radtags command of the software STACKS [29]. After quality control (rejecting samples with less than 1 million reads), 68 samples were retained and there was an average of 2.8 million read pairs per sample among these. Paired reads were mapped against the Tu. truncatus genome (accession GCA_001922835.1; [30]) using BWA v. 0.7.12 (bwa mem –aM; [31]). Each resulting sam file was converted to bam format using Samtools v. 1.3. [32].

Using the command SelectVariants, indels and non-biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were filtered out. Then using the command VariantFiltration, SNPs were filtered based on mapping quality using the following settings: --filterExpression ‘QD<2.0||FS>60.0||MQ<40.0||MQRankSum←12.5||ReadPosRankSum←8.0’. The QUAL score (QD) was normalized by allele depth for a variant, and the Phred- scaled p-value (FS) used Fisher's exact tests to detect strand bias. The MQRankSum command set the z-score from a Wilcoxon rank-sum test of Alt versus Ref read mapping qualities, and ReadPosRankSum did this for reading position bias. Samtools was also used to pick-up reads in concordance and retain SNPs with a single hit. Loci were assembled using the GATK HaplotypeCaller [33].

Using the filterAlign plugin through TASSEL v. 5.0 [34], the vcf file was filtered to require a minimum of 80% of taxa for which the SNP must have been scored and a minor allele frequency of 0.05. These settings generated 83 414 SNPs. Vcf-tools [35] through the command --thin (set at 200 bp) was then used to retain a single SNP per read, reducing the final number to 43 018 SNPs for further analyses. The software TASSEL v. 5.0 was also used for the generalized linear model (GLM) analysis. As required by TASSEL, the vcf file was sorted using the SortGenotypeFile plugin. For the GLM analyses, the filtered vcf file and the trait file (samples allocated to different infestation categories, age class and mortality during a morbillivirus event) were merged through the -intersect command. For the final GLM analysis, permutations were set to 1000, under the -FixedEffectLMPlugin command. This function performs association analysis using a least squares fixed effects linear model and uses a fixed effects linear model to test for association between segregating sites and a trait. The qqman package [36] was used to visualize Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile (QQ) plots of the outputs of the GLM analyses. The program plots the negative logarithm of p-value for each SNP across the genome. Bonferroni type one correction was used to assess significance for multiple tests.

The samples were considered to be from a single population, and to confirm this, we used the principal component analysis (PCA) method implemented in the R package Adegenet v. 2.0 [37]. To test for the presence of SNPs on sex chromosomes, we used the Perl script nucmer in the program MUMmer [38] to align the Tursiops reference genome against the cow genome (accession number: GCA_002263795.2; [30]). The program finds maximal exact matches and aligns them to join the clusters into a single high scoring pairwise alignment. The ‘delta’ file generated by this analysis was filtered using the --delta-filter flag. The program show-coords was then used to parse the delta alignment output displaying summary information such as position, per cent identity and per cent alignment coverage.

We compared pathogen loads against several metrics of genomic diversity derived using the R package InbreedR [39]. The first is a standardized multilocus heterozygosity (sMLH; see [10]), which assesses average heterozygosity across the genome. We used the second metric, g2 [40], as a proxy for identity disequilibrium, providing an estimate of variation in identity by descent (e.g. if g2 = 0 there is no variance in inbreeding in the sample). We also show the results from an alternative method for assessing identity disequilibrium, heterozygosity–heterozygosity (het-het) correlation coefficients (HHC; [41]). This analysis reiterates the comparison of random subsets to show the distribution of HHC in the sample. We provide this as an illustrative metric, since it is less robust as a statistic than g2 given that samples within the HHC distribution are non-independent. To further consider the role of inbreeding, we ran two analyses (see [10,42]), one for the expected correlation between the trait value (W, pathogen load in this case) and heterozygosity (h): rWf2, and one for the expected correlation between inbreeding level (f) and the trait value (rWf2). All analyses quantifying diversity assessments for the SNP dataset were repeated for the 23 microsatellite DNA locus dataset, which was analysed for the same set of samples and reported in [22].

(d). Major histocompatibility complex analyses

Exon-2 of the MHC Class II DQB1 locus was amplified with DQB1 F: CTGGTAGTTGTGTCTGCACAC and DBQ1 R: CATGTGCTACTTCACCTTCGG (after [43]). Reaction conditions were 10 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.25 µM of each primer, 2 units of high-fidelity Pfu Taq polymerase (Promega, UK), 0.8 mM dimethyl sulfoxide 20% and 1 µl of total DNA in 20 µl final volume. The PCR cycling profile was an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 15 min, following by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 30 s and elongation at 72°C for 30 s followed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 15 min. To identify allelic diversity, individuals were screened by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis [27]. Allelic conformation was visualized by exposure to ultraviolet light. The allelic diversity for each individual was scored and genotypes were assigned. After the identification of putative unique alleles, the same PCR products were loaded again onto a non-denaturing acrylamide gel (6%), and this time, the bands representing unique alleles (with some replication) were extracted from the gel.

Gel fragments were crushed in 50 µl of 10 mM tris-EDTA and incubated overnight at 37°C. One millilitre of the solution was then amplified by PCR (using the same concentrations and PCR profile as described before) using the high-fidelity Pfu Taq polymerase. PCR products, prior to sequencing, were purified using a Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification KitTM, to remove primer dimmers, unincorporated dNTPs and chemicals, according to manufacturer instructions. Purified DNA was sequenced in both directions on an ABI 377 automated sequencer. The PCR products of the putative unique alleles were cloned, using an Easy T-Vector Cloning Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer instructions, in order to compare allele sizes and confirm that a single band represented a single allele. Up to eight clones were screened by SSCP from different individuals. A total of 80 individuals were successfully genotyped from the Valencia population. For this analysis, an additional 22 striped dolphin samples from Ireland were also genotyped to consider the possibility of regional variation at the MHC loci (as reported earlier [13]). The samples from Ireland were from stranding events outside of morbillivirus periods. Sequences were analysed using ChromasPro v. 1.5 (Technolysium Ltd). Nucleotide sequences were aligned using ClustalX v. 2.0.12 [44]. BLAST (http://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi/) was used to confirm that DNA sequences represented the exon-2 MHC Class II DQB1 locus. Rates of non-synonymous and synonymous substitutions were calculated using the software MEGA v. 6 [45]. The dN/dS ratio was computed according to the Nei-Gojobori method [46].

Amino acid distributions were calculated in the 10 residues of the peptide-binding region (PBS; after [47]) to test for associations with specific functional components and parasite load. The charge of amino acids of the P4 pocket was based on the β70 β71 β74 residues according to the physico-chemical properties [48]. The amino acids' supertype state was determined according to the following categorization [49]:

  •  (n) neutral supertype: F, M, W, I, V, L, A, P, C, N, Q, T, Y, S, G

  •  (+) positive supertype: H, K, R

  •  (−) negative supertype: D, E

The total charge of each allele was the sum of each residue's charge. For example, if an allele was positively and negatively charged in pocket 4, it was classified in the di-charged supertype group. A GLM was performed to evaluate associations between MHC genotype and gender, length, morbillivirus epizootic event periods and parasite load. The morbillivirus epizootic events were categorized as: (i) samples from the first recorded event from 1990 to 1992, (ii) samples from 1993 to 2006 which were outside of the morbillivirus epizootic events, and (iii) samples from after 2007 during the second morbillivirus epizootic. Parasite load was used as the response variable. Statistics were conducted using the statistical package R-platform. False discovery rates were determined using the large Qvalue software package [50].

3. Results

(a). Parasites

Comparing dolphins collected during or outside the time of morbillivirus epizootics showed no significant differences in genetic diversity, and no clear distortion of the pattern observed for lungworm infection (for either SNP or MHC analyses; data not shown), so all samples were used for further assessment based on lungworm parasite load. For the SNP dataset, 42 animals were infected with lungworm (61.8%), whereas 26 (38.2%) were uninfected. Only a single parasite species was found during the gross lung examination, the nematode Sk. guevarai (Nematoda: Pseudaliidae). The infestation load among individuals ranged from 0 to 370 worms. Lungworm counts fit a negative binomial distribution (skewness measure = 0.159, with respect to the negative binomial, p < 0.05). Parasite count intensity parameters (skewness, mean, median and exact confidence intervals) are shown in the electronic supplementary material, table S2. There were 18 infected individuals out of the 30 female striped dolphins and 24 infected out of 38 males (electronic supplementary material, table S1), and these ratios are not significantly different (contigency test: Pearson χ2 = 0.02, p = 0.8875).

(b). Genomic measures of diversity

PCA analyses revealed a single cluster with a few outliers (electronic supplementary material, figure S2), so the sample set was treated as a single population. All results were essentially the same when those outliers were removed (see the electronic supplementary material), and so, all samples were retained. No significance was found for any tested associations between parasite load and genomic diversity as estimated using 23 microsatellite DNA markers (e.g. electronic supplementary material, figure S3). Further analyses reported are, therefore, based on the 43 018 ddRAD SNP dataset. From our mapping of the Tursiops genome against cow (Bos taurus, sequenced to chromosomes), we identified contigs in the Tursiops genome that map to the cow X-chromosome (see the electronic supplementary material, table S3). None of our SNPs map to those contigs, and so our results will be unbiased by sex-linked loci. For the SNP data, sMLH was strongly correlated with parasite load in female individuals, but not in males (based on all individuals; see results in figure 1). This remains true when only infected individuals are considered (females: rWh2=0.517, F1,16 = 17.14, p = 0.0007; males: rWh2=0.030, F1,22 = 1.804, p = 0.193; table 1), and when the three female samples with the lowest sMLH were removed (r2 = 0.26, F1,13 = 8.08, p = 0.0089).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Correlation between parasite load (total number of parasites counted per individual) and RAD standardized multilocus heterozygosity (sMLH) for (a) 30 female striped dolphin individuals and (b) 38 male dolphins. (Online version in colour.)

Table 1.

Metrics from the InbreedR analyses for 43 018 SNP loci. (Distribution variance of standardized multilocus heterozygosity [σ2(h)], expected correlation between a fitness trait and heterozygosity (rWf2), expected correlation between a fitness trait and inbreeding (rWf2), identity disequilibrium (g2), distribution variance of heterozygosity–heterozygosity correlation coefficient (HHC) with confidence intervals (CI: 2.5–97.5%). Values in bold indicate statistical significance.)

σ2(h) rWh2 rWf2 g2 HHC
all (68) 0.0226 0.019 0.0148 0.030 ± 0.007, p = 0.001 0.997 ± 0.001
(CI: 0.016 – 0.041) (CI: 0.996 – 0.998)
female (30) 0.0155 0.517 0.387 0.021 ± 0.01, p = 0.001 0.991 ± 0.002
(CI: 0.003 – 0.040) (CI: 0.987 – 0.996)
male (38) 0.026 0.030 0.0236 0.030 ± 0.01, p = 0.001 0.994 ± 0.001
(CI: 0.02– 0.07) (CI: 0.991 – 0.997)

The mean sMLH was significantly elevated in low-level compared to high-level infected female individuals (sMLH = 1.10 ± 0.046 (s.d.) versus 0.948 ± 0.177, respectively; Mann–Whitney U-test, z = 2.523, p = 0.0114; figure 2; see table 1 for variance values). For males, there was no significant difference (0.966 ± 0.170 versus 0.961 ± 0.132; z = 1.40, p = 0.132). A highly significant relationship was also obtained between parasite load and measures of genome-wide inbreeding in female individuals, but not in males (see rWh2 and rWf2 in table 1). Analysing all 68 samples together, g2 (assessing inbreeding among loci; [10,38]) was significantly different from zero (p = 0.001), implying inbreeding (table 1). The distribution of HHC shows tight distributions for both SNP (table 1; electronic supplementary material, figure S3) and microsatellite DNA data (electronic supplementary material, figure S4) with a mean close to one, suggesting inbreeding. The GLM analysis (implemented in TASSEL) showed a highly significant association between parasite load and a specific SNP, but this was revealed only in female individuals (p = 8.21 × 10−11; electronic supplementary material, figure S5) after correction for type I error (threshold p = 1.16 × 10−6). This SNP is found within the intronic region of the citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase (CIT) gene that functions in cell division. Uninfected females were all heterozygous at this SNP, and all but one infected individuals were homozygous (table 2). GLM analyses based on age class and/or mortality during morbillivirus events in conjuction with infestation categories for each gender did not reveal any strong associations as illustrated in the QQ-plots (electronic supplementary material, figure S6). All analyses were replicated omitting the four outlier individuals from the PCA analysis shown in the electronic supplementary material, figure S1. There were no differences in the patterns observed or levels of significance, illustrated by a replication of table 1 omitting these samples in electronic supplementary material, table S4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Relationship between RAD-sMLH mean values (±s.e.) against the infestation status of the striped dolphin individuals. F low (sMLH: 1.10 ± 0.013 s.e.) = females with low parasite load (less than or equal to 20); F high (sMLH: 0.948 ± 0.042) = females with high load (greater than 20); M low (sMLH: 0.966 ± 0.045) = males with low and M high (sMLH: 0.961 ± 0.027) = males with high load. Error bars show standard error of the mean. (Online version in colour.)

Table 2.

Genotypes of the female striped dolphin individuals of the outlier SNP within the gene citron rho-interacting serine/threonine kinase (CIT). (Colour coded for homozygous (blue or yellow) and heterozygous (green). ‘N’ means the individual could not be scored.)

uninfected
infected
genotype parasites genotype parasites
AC 0 CC 1
AC 0 AA 3
AC 0 AA 4
AC 0 AC 6
AC 0 CC 7
N 0 AA 12
AC 0 AA 16
AC 0 AA 16
AC 0 CC 21
AC 0 AA 37
N 0 AA 80
AC 0 AA 104
AA 105
AA 119
CC 135
AA 166
AA 232
N 256

(c). Major histocompatibility complex variation

Sequenced MHC clones revealed no more than two sequences in each individual. Twenty-one alleles were found with a unique amino acid composition (electronic supplementary material, table S5). Alleles were named Sc-DQB*01 to Sc-DQB*21 according to their frequency in the study population. A BLAST search indicated amplification of the correct locus. Only one individual was homozygous at this locus, and so a test between parasite load and heterozygosity was not possible. In pocket 4 of the PBS region, 100% of the translated amino acids were variable. The rate of non-synonymous (dN) compared to synonymous substitutions (dS) was significantly elevated at antigen-binding sites and within the P4 region (table 3). There was a significant difference in the P4 charge property profile comparing the populations in Valencia and Ireland (χ22 = 9.16, p = 0.01; electronic supplementary material, figure S7). In the Valencia population, we compared parasite load levels with allelic diversity. We found two alleles (Sc-DQB*11 and Sc-DQB*21) that were disproportionately likely to be present in individuals with no parasites (binomial test for the presence of either or both alleles calculating the combined probability (frequency) of these alleles in dolphins with parasites and then determining the probability of finding none among the dolphins without parasites, p = 7.02 × 10−8; electronic supplementary material, table S3). GLM analyses did not reveal any associations between factors listed in the electronic supplementary material, table S6.

Table 3.

Estimated rates of non-synonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitutions for non-antigen-binding sites (non-ABS), pocket 4 peptide-binding sites (P4-PBS) and antigen-binding sites (ABS) of the exon-2 MHC Class II DQB1 locus of striped dolphin individuals. (Significance was assessed using a two-tailed test of the probability that dN and dS are different using z-test.)

position dN dS dN/dS p; z-test value
non-ABS 0.026 ± 0.013 0.014 ± 0.014 1.85 0.260; z = 0.646
P4-PBS 0.268 ± 0.037 0.070 ± 0.064 3.82 0.002; z = 2.949
ABS 0.190 ± 0.054 0.009 ± 0.010 21.11 0.00058; z = 3.465

4. Discussion

Our RADseq analyses showed that genome-wide heterozygosity was significantly associated with lungworm infection, especially beyond a stage of infection that reflects substantial blockage of airways, however only in females. This could have important implications both for understanding the evolutionary process (e.g. if selection affected males and females separately as a consequence) and for developing conservation strategy (e.g. if females are more impacted by low effective population size (Ne) and the loss of diversity than males). Lungworm infection is widespread in marine mammals [51] impacting on the health of both cetaceans and pinnipeds (e.g. [4]). Therefore, inference drawn from our study could have implications for a broad range of other species.

A significant result restricted to females may be owing to maternal stress factors such as parturition or nursing, causing females to cross a threshold such that the association with parasite resistance becomes apparent. In a study of Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis), Richardson et al. [52] found that the offspring of highly heterozygous females survived better than the offspring of inbred mothers, potentially associated with the female condition. They found no HFC for males. Jamieson et al. [53] also showed that the mother's level of inbreeding affects offspring fitness in the New Zealand takahe (Porphyrio hochstetteri). For the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), Keller [54] showed that a reduction in fitness associated with inbreeding was only seen in inbred female individuals. Although we have no pedigree data and so cannot assess the impact on the health of offspring, a direct relationship between maternal and offspring health is often implied.

Relevant to this, we found a female-specific effect at the CIT locus, discovered from screening the RAD data across the genome. CIT functions in cell division. Together with kinesin (KIF14), this protein localizes to the central spindle and mid-body of the cell and functions to promote efficient cytokinesis. Smith et al. [55] argue that a greater increase in the percentages of bi-nucleated/multinucleated cells was seen after the expression of EGFP-bSV-831-1281, which contains a coiled-coil sequence and binding sites for the central-spindle protein KIF14. CIT is required for KIF14 localization to the central spindle and mid-body, so there is a connection between CIT and the presence of bi-nucleated/multinucleated cells, because CIT plays a role in cytokinesis and displays the serine/threonine-protein kinase activity. Rios et al. [56] suggest that bi-nucleated cells evolved to maximize milk production and promote the survival of offspring across all mammalian species through the expression of serine/threonine kinases (AURKA and PLK-1) as key regulators of cytokinesis. This may suggest a more direct connection with fitness, whereby maternal inbreeding depression could affect the survival of offspring owing to processes associated with lactation.

However, it is not clear why CIT heterozygotes, in particular, would be associated with reduced lungworm infection. Furthermore, the SNP appears in an intron and therefore is not certain to affect the structure or expression of the CIT locus (though intronic mutations can affect gene expression with or without an impact on alternative splicing; e.g. [57]). Given that our scan was based on a finite number of SNPs and referenced against a related species (Tu. truncatus), it is likely that there are other relevant loci not identified by our analysis and possible that the SNP identified is actually in linkage disequilibrium with another locus that reflects the true function affected. Furthermore, there could be a heterosis effect at CIT or some other locus, such that the relevant function is improved for heterozygote females, but further work would be required to assess this and better understand the mechanisms.

The life history of the parasite may provide some insight into the sex-specific pattern we observe. This is a pseudaliid parasite, and although little is known about the life history of any species in this group, the high level of infection in juvenile and even neonate hosts for a number of parasite species supports the possibility of vertical transmission in milk or via the placenta (see review in [51]). For example, there is evidence for trans-placental transmission of Halocercus lagenorhynchi in bottlenose dolphins (Tu. truncatus; [58]). At the same time, the prevalence of infection in older cetaceans of some species suggests the potential for horizontal transfer (see [51]). Analyses of Sk. guevarai in striped dolphins strongly suggest vertical transfer because neonates with only milk in their stomachs were found with up to 80 parasites [59]. However, infection in adults suggests the possibility of horizontal transfer for this host–parasite system as well. Vertical transfer may be another way in which inbreeding and a consequent higher infection rate in female striped dolphins could impact on fitness in this species through a greater transfer of parasites to offspring.

For exon-2 of the MHC Class II DQB1 locus, two alleles showed a significant association with parasite load, in this case between those with no parasites compared to those with infection at any level, and for both males and females. There are a number of other studies that also show this type of association between parasite load and class II MHC alleles, for example, in association with the frequency of a DRB*1 allele in striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) infected with a gastrointestinal parasite [60]. However, the effect is not universal and probably depends on the particular relationship between the locus or loci investigated and the specific pathogen [61,62]. The implication is a selective advantage for particular alleles in the context of specific pathogens. Consistent with this, we found that the charge properties at the pocket 4 residues in this locus varied between the two sampled populations, showing the possibility of directional selection and local adaptation as seen for two other delphinid species in an earlier study [13].

In this study, we show that there is a significant female-specific association between genomic heterozygosity at 43 018 SNP loci and infestation with a parasite that can reduce lung function, even though an assessment using 23 microsatellite DNA loci showed no association. A significant g2 value suggests that this relationship is associated with inbreeding [10]. Possible balancing selection restricted to females (given that all uninfected females were heterozygous) at a locus relevant to lactation (CIT) and probable vertical transmission of parasites from mother to offspring [59] may suggest a more direct connection to fitness if the health of offspring is affected. We have no data that could directly explain why females exposed to this pathogen are apparently more impacted by inbreeding than males. However, female-specific effects from inbreeding have been suggested to be owing to various possible factors including maternal investment [63], sex-specific gene expression [64] and sexual selection or life history [65]. Among the possible explanations, maternal investment seems most likely for mammals in general, where only females invest in the gestation and post-natal development of offspring. For the Class II MHC DQB locus, we find no sex-specific association, but we do find putative adaptive differences among populations (cf. [13]) and an association between parasite load and genotype for both sexes. In this case, the association may be based on directional selection. Together these data extend our understanding of the mechanisms by which genomic diversity can be associated with pathogen resistance and, ultimately, fitness. If a sex bias were to be strong and consistent, it could affect sex ratios and Ne, and thereby have an impact on strategy for the effective conservation of these populations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary tables and figures
rspb20200195supp1.docx (873.9KB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Acknowledgements

We thank Juan Antonio Balbuena for assistance with the parasite analyses. We thank the Wildlife Service of the Conselleria d'Agricultura, Medi Ambient, Canvi Climatic i Desenvolupament Rural of the Generalitat Valenciana for logistic and financial support to the Valencian cetacean strandings network. We thank Emer Rogan for samples from Ireland.

Data accessibility

DNA sequences: GenBank accessions: MHC loci: MT074331-MT074351; RADseq reads: PRJNA606402. Vcf files for SNP data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwb5 [66].

Authors' contributions

The study was conceived by A.R.H. and G.G. and written by G.G. and A.R.H. with contributions from all authors. M.d.J. contributed to analytical work, J.A.R., A.E. and F.J.A. to data interpretation and sample provision.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was funded by the Hellenic State Scholarship Foundation through PhD grant awarded to Dr Georgios A. Gkafas. F.J.A. and J.A.R. are supported by Prometeo II/2015/018 project (Generalitat Valenciana, Spain).

References

  • 1.Tsitrone A, Rousset F, David P. 2001. Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history. Genetics 159, 1845–1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.David P. 1998. Heterozygosity–fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80, 531–537. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00393.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC. 2009. A quantitative review of heterozygosity–fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2746–2765. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04247.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoffman JA, Simpson F, David P, Rijks JM, Kuiken T, Thorne MAS, Lacy RC, Dasmahapatra KK. 2014. High–throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3775–3780. ( 10.1073/pnas.1318945111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lozier JD. 2014. Revisiting comparisons of genetic diversity in stable and declining species: assessing genome-wide polymorphism in North American bumble bees using RAD sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 23, 788–801. ( 10.1111/mec.12636) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fischer M.C., Rellstab C., Leuzinger M. et al. 2017. Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation – an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri. BMC Genomics 18, 69 ( 10.1186/s12864-016-3459-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2012. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7, e37135 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0037135) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hansson B, Westerberg L. 2003. On the correlation of heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2467–2474. ( 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01644.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lenz TL, Mueller B, Trillmich F, Wolf JB. 2013. Divergent allele advantage at MHC–DRB through direct and maternal genotypic effects and its consequences for allele pool composition and mating. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20130714 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.0714) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P. 2010. Heterozygosity–fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64, 1202–1217. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00966.x). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernatchez L, Landry C. 2003. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J. Evolution. Biol. 16, 363–337 ( 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00531.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eizaguirre C, Lenz TL. 2010. Major histocompatibility complex polymorphism: dynamics and consequences of parasite–mediated local adaptation in fishes. J. Fish. Biol. 77, 2023–2047. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02819.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vassilakos D, Natoli A, Dahlheim M, Hoelzel AR. 2009. Balancing and directional selection at exon–2 of the MHC DQB1 locus among populations of odontocete cetaceans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 681–689. ( 10.1093/molbev/msn296) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwensow N, Eberle M, Sommer S. 2008. Compatibility counts: MHC–associated mate choice in a wild promiscuous primate. Proc. R. Soc. B 75, 555–564. ( 10.1098/rspb.2007.1433) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Juola FA, Dearborn DC. 2012. Sequence–based evidence for major histocompatibility complex disassortative mating in a colonial seabird. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 153–162. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.0562) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ou D, Mitchell LA, Domeier ME, Tsang AOW, Decarie D, Nepom GT, Lacroix M, Zrein M. 1996. Characterization of HLA restrictive elements of rubella virus–specific cytotoxic T cell clone: influence of HLADR4b chain residue 74 polymorphism on Ag peptide–T cell interaction. Int. Immunol. 8, 1577–1586. ( 10.1093/intimm/8.10.1577) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raga JA, Carbonell E. 1985. New data about parasites on Stenella coeruleoalba (Meyen, 1833) (Cetacea: Delphinidae) in the western Mediterranean Sea. Inv. Cetacea 14, 337–338. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Raga JA, Abril F, Almor P. 1987. Skrjabinalius guevaraii Galego and Selva 1979 (Nematoda: Pseudaliidae), a lungworm parasitizing dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinidae) in the western Mediterranean Sea. Rivista di Parassitologia 4, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clausen B, Andersen S. 1988. Evaluation of bycatch and health status of the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in Danish waters. Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Raga JA, Balbuena JA, Aznar FJ, Fernandez M. 1997. The impact of parasites on marine mammals: a review. Parasitologia 39, 293–296. ( 10.1515/mamm.1972.36.3.521) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pugliares K, Bogomonli A, Touhey KM, Herzig SM, Harry CT, Moore MJ. 2007. Marine mammal necropsy: an introductory guide for stranding responders and field biologists. Woods Hole Oceanog Inst Tech Report WHOI-2007-06 ( 10.1575/1912/1823) [DOI]
  • 22.Gkafas GA, Exadactylos A, Rogan E, Raga JA, Reid R, Hoelzel AR. 2017. Biogeography and temporal progression during the evolution of striped dolphin population structure in European waters. J. Biogeogr. 44, 2681–2691. ( 10.1111/jbi.13079) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aasen E, Medrano JF. 1990. Amplification of the ZFY and ZFX genes for sex identification in human, cattle, sheep, and goats. Nat. Biotechnol. 8, 1279–1281. ( 10.1038/nbt1290-1279) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gilson A, Syvanen M, Levine K, Banks J. 1998. Deer gender determination by polymerase chain reaction: validation study and application to tissues, bloodstains and hair forensic samples from California. Calif. Fish Game 84, 159–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Calzada N, Aguilar A, Lockyer C, Grau E. 1997. Patterns of grown and physical maturity in the western Mediterranean striped dolphn, Stenella coeruleoalba (Cetacea: Odontoceti). Can. J. Zool. 75, 632–637. ( 10.1139/z97-078) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Siebert U, et al. 2001. Post-mortem findings in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the German North and Baltic Seas. J. Comp. Pathol. 124, 102–114. ( 10.1053/jcpa.2000.0436) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lepais O, Weir JT. 2014. SimRAD: an R package for simulation–based prediction of the number of loci expected in RADseq and similar genotyping by sequencing approaches. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 1314–1321. ( 10.1111/1755-0998.12273) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA. 2013. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3124–3140. ( 10.1111/mec.12354) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lindblad-Toh K, et al. 2011. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature 478, 476–482. ( 10.1038/nature10530) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H. 2012. Exploring single–sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole–genome de novo assembly. Bioinformatics 28, 1838–1844. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts280) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McKenna A, et al. 2010. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next–generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303. ( 10.1101/gr.107524.110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. 2007. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Danecek P. et al. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turner SD. 2014. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/05/14/005165.
  • 37.Jombart T. 2008. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R12 ( 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stoffel MA, Esser M, Kardos M, Humble E, Nichols H, David P, Hoffman JI. 2016. InbreedR: an R package for the analysis of inbreeding based on genetic markers. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1331–1339. ( 10.1111/2041-210X.12588) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J. 2007. Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2474–2487. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03330.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T. 2004. Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol. Ecol. 13, 3021–3031. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE, McEwan JC. 2004. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93, 255 ( 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsuji K, Aizawa M, Sasazuki T.. 1992. HLA 1991: Proc. 11th Int. Histocompatibility Workshop and Conf. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • 44.Larkin MA, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596–1599. ( 10.1093/molbev/msm092) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nei M, Gojobori T. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and non–synonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 418–426. ( 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brown JH, Jardetzky TS, Gorga JC, Stern LJ, Urban RG, Strominger JL, Wiley DC. 1993. Three–dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA–DR1. Nature 364, 33–39. ( 10.1038/364033a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stern JL, Brown JH, Jardetzky BJH, Gorga JC, Urban RG, Strominger JL, Wiley DC. 1994. Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA–DRB1 complexed with an influenza virus peptide. Nature 368, 215–221. ( 10.1038/368215a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ou D, Mitchel LA, Tingle AJ. 1998. A new categorization of HLA DR alleles on a functional basis. Hum. Immunol. 59, 665–676. ( 10.1016/S0198-8859(98)00067-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Brown AA. 2015. largeQvalue: a program for calculating FDR estimates with large datasets. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/03/18/010074.
  • 51.Measures LN. 2001. Lungworms of marine mammals. In Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, 2nd edn (eds Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA), pp. 279–300. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T. 2004. Inbreeding in the Seychelles warbler: environment–dependent maternal effects. Evolution 58, 2037–2048. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00488.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jamieson IG, Roy MS, Lettink M. 2003. Sex–specific consequences of recent inbreeding in an ancestrally inbred population of New Zealand takahe. Conserv. Biol. 17, 708–716. ( 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01400.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Keller LF. 1998. Inbreeding and its fitness effects in an insular population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 52, 240–250. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05157.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Smith TC, et al. 2013. Supervillin binding to myosin II and synergism with anillin are required for cytokinesis. MBoC 24, 3603–3619. ( 10.1091/mbc.e12-10-0714) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rios AC, Fu NY, Jamieson PR, Pal B, Whitehead L, Nicholas KR, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. 2016. Essential role for a novel population of binucleated mammary epithelial cells in lactation. Nat. Commun. 22, 11400 ( 10.1038/ncomms11400) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rose AB, Beliakoff JA. 2000. Intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression independent of unique intron sequences and splicing. Plant Phys. 122, 535–542. ( 10.1104/pp.122.2.535) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dailey M, et al. 1991. Evidence of prenatal infection in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) with the lungworm Halocercus lagenorhynchi (Nematoda: Pseudaliidae). J. Wildlife Dis. 27, 164–165. ( 10.7589/0090-3558-27.1.164) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pool R, Chandradeva N, Gkafas GA, Raga JA, Fernández M, Aznar FJ. In press. Transmission and predictors of burden of lungworms of the striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) in the western Mediterranean. J. Wildlife Dis. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Froeschke G, Sommer S. 2005. MHC Class II DRB variability and parasite load in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) in the Southern Kalahari. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1254–1259. ( 10.1093/molbev/msi112) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Radwan J, Biedrzycka A, Babik W. 2009. Does reduced MHC diversity decrease viability of vertebrate populations? CEE review 09-004 (SR65). Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. See www.environmentalevidence.org/SR65.html.
  • 62.Radwan J, Kuduk K, Levy E, Lebas N, Babik W. 2014. Parasite load and MHC diversity in undisturbed and agriculturally modified habitats of the ornate dragon lizard. Mol. Ecol. 23, 5966–5978. ( 10.1111/mec.12984) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Charpentier M, Setchell JM, Prugnolle F et al. 2006. Life history correlates of inbreeding depression in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Mol. Ecol. 15, 21–28. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02760.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yun L, Agrawal AF. 2014. Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence. Evolution 68, 3599–3606. ( 10.1111/evo.12527) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ebel ER, Phillips PC. 2016. Intrinsic differences between males and females determine sex-specific consequences of inbreeding. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 1 ( 10.1186/s12862-015-0575-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gkafas GA, de Jong M, Exadactylos A, Raga JA, Aznar FJ, Hoelzel AR. 2020. Sex-specific impact of inbreeding on pathogen load in the striped dolphin Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwb5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Gkafas GA, de Jong M, Exadactylos A, Raga JA, Aznar FJ, Hoelzel AR. 2020. Sex-specific impact of inbreeding on pathogen load in the striped dolphin Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwb5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary tables and figures
rspb20200195supp1.docx (873.9KB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Data Availability Statement

DNA sequences: GenBank accessions: MHC loci: MT074331-MT074351; RADseq reads: PRJNA606402. Vcf files for SNP data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwb5 [66].


Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES