Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2004 Sep 27;14(3):608–621. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(90)90265-L

Reproduction, growth, and development of rats during chronic exposure to multiple field strengths of 60-Hz electric fields

DN Rommereim 1, RL Rommereim 1, MR Sikov 1, RL Buschbom 1, LE Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC7126539  PMID: 2340987

Abstract

A study with multiple exposure groups and large group sizes was performed to establish whether exposure to 60-Hz electric fields would result in reproductive and developmental toxicity. A response model was developed from previous results and tested in groups of rats exposed to electric fields at various field strengths. Female rats were mated, and sperm-positive animals randomly distributed among four groups: sham-exposed or exposed to 10, 65, or 130 kV/m, 60-Hz vertical electric fields. Animals were exposed for 19 hr/day throughout the experiment. During gestation, exposure to the higher field strengths resulted in slightly depressed weight gains of dams. Offspring were born in the field and remained with their dams through the suckling period. Numbers of pups per litter and pup mortality did not differ among the exposure groups. Dams exposed at 65 kV/m lost slightly more weight through the lactation period than the control group. Male pups exposed to higher field strengths gained slightly less weight from 4 to 21 days of age than did sham-exposed animals. At weaning, two F1 females per litter (randomly selected) continued on the same exposure regimen were mated at 11 weeks of age to unexposed males, and euthanized at 20 days of gestation. Uterine contents were evaluated, and all liver fetuses were weighed and examined for external, visceral, and skeletal malformations. Fertility and gestational weight gain of F1 females were not affected by exposure, nor was prenatal viability or fetal body weight. No significant increase in the incidence of litters with malformations was observed. Although no developmental toxicity was detected, exposures produced physical changes in the dams, evidenced as a rust-colored deposit on the muzzle and ears (chromodacryorrhea) that increased in incidence and severity at 65 and 130 kV/m. Incidence of chromodacryorrhea was not significantly different between sham-exposed rats and those exposed at 10 kV/m.

References

  1. Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics. 1955;11:375–386. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow S.M., McElhatton P.R., Sullivan F.M. The relation between maternal restraint and food deprivation, plasma corticosterone, and induction of cleft palate in the offspring of mice. Teratology. 1975;12:97–104. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420120202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breslow N. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing k samples subject to unequal censorship. Biometrika. 1970;57:579–594. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cochran W.G. Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests. Biometrics. 1954;11:417–451. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook R.O., Nawrot P.S., Hamm C.W. Effects of high-frequency noise on prenatal development and maternal plasma and uterine catecholamine concentrations in the CD-1 mouse. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1982;66:338–348. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(82)90300-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cutler S.J., Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J. Chronic Dis. 1958;8:699–713. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dietrich F.M., Patterson R.C. Electric Power Research Institute; Palo Alto, CA: 1988. (Design and Testing of a Small-Animal Electric Field Exposure Facility, Final Report, EPRI Project 799-18). [Google Scholar]
  8. Dixon W.J. Univ. of California Press; Berkeley: 1983. (BMDP Statistical Software). [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeman M.F., Tukey J.W. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann. Math. Stat. 1950;21:607. [Google Scholar]
  10. Knickerbocker G.G., Kouwenhoven W.B., Barnes H.C. Exposure of mice to a strong ac field—An experimental study. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1967;PAS-86:498–505. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kramer C.Y. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 1956;12:307–310. [Google Scholar]
  12. Leung F.C., Rommereim D.N., Miller R.A., Anderson L.E. Brown-colored deposits observed on hair of female rats chronically exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. Abstracts, Tenth Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society; June 19–23, 1988, Stanford, CT; 1988. p. 68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manson J.M., Zenick H., Costlow R.D. Teratology test methods for laboratory animals. In: Hayes A.W., editor. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. Raven Press; New York: 1984. pp. 14–184. [Google Scholar]
  14. Marino A.A., Becker R.O., Ullrich B. The effect of continuous exposure to low frequency electric fields on three generations of mice: A pilot study. Experientia. 1967;32:565–566. doi: 10.1007/BF01990163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marino A.A., Reichmanis M., Becker R.O., Ullrich B., Cullen J.B. Power frequency electric field induced biological changes in successive generations of mice. Experientia. 1980;36:309–311. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rommereim D.N., Kaune W.T., Buschbom R.L., Phillips R.D., Sikov M.R. Reproduction and development in rats chronologically exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1987;8:243–258. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250080304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rommereim D.N., Kaune W.T., Anderson L.E., Sikov M.R. Rats successfully reproduce and rear litters during chronic exposure to 150-kV/m, 60-Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1989;10:385–389. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250100407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenzweig S., Blaustein F.M. Cleft palate in AJ mice resulting from restraint and deprivation of food and water. Teratology. 1970;3:47–52. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420030110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salewski E. Farbemethode zum makroskopischen nachweis von implantations-stellen am uterus der ratte. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmakol. 1964;247:367. [Google Scholar]
  20. SAS Institute . SAS Institute Inc.,; Cary, NC: 1985. (SAS User's Guide, Statistics, Version 5). [Google Scholar]
  21. Scialli A.R. Is stress a developmental toxin? Rep. Toxicol. 1988;1:163–171. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(87)80028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siegel S. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1956. (Non-Parametric Statistics for Behavioral Sciences). [Google Scholar]
  23. Sikov M.R., Montgomery L.D., Smith L.G., Phillips R.D. Studies on prenatal development in rats exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1984;5:101–112. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250050111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sikov M.R., Rommereim D.N., Beamer J.L., Buschbom R.L., Kaune W.T., Phillips R.D. Developmental studies of Hanford miniature swine exposed to 60-Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1987;8:229–242. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250080303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Staples R.E. Detection of visceral alterations in mammalian fetuses. Teratology. 1974;9:A37–A38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Staples R.E., Schnell V.L. Refinements in rapid clearing technic in the KOH-alizarin red S method for fetal bone. Stain Technol. 1964;39:62–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tukey J.W. Princeton University; Princeton, NJ: 1953. The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished notes. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson J.G. Methods for administering agents and detecting malformations in experimental animals. In: Wilson J.G., Warkany J., editors. Teratology Principles and Techniques. University of Chicago Press; Chicago: 1965. pp. 262–277. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Fundamental and Applied Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES