Abstract
Accreditation is an internationally recognised process through which healthcare organisations are able to improve the safety and quality of services delivered to patients. The focus of accreditation is to help organisations understand what they are doing well and what opportunities are available for improvement. The Canadian approach to accreditation is a rigorous peer review process comprised of a self-assessment against a set of standards, an on-site survey and follow-up action on recommendations that arise from the survey. The accreditation standards can be used effectively to guide the surgical teams in the transformation of the specialty. The 17 standards that are used to evaluate surgical teams relate to the activities that represent the continuum of clinical care as well as aspects related to learning. Within the subsections and standards are opportunities for surgeons and surgical teams to use the standards to effectively deliver services and to continuously improve patient care. In 38 recent Canadian Accreditation AIM surveys, that included at least one surgical team, there were a total of 75 recommendations made to the teams. Most recommendations related to process as opposed to outcome issues, implying that surgeons need to become more proactive in the functioning of the surgical team and to participate more effectively in management issues related to surgical care. Attention to these details will position surgical programmes to effectively deal with the rapid pace of change that is inherent in a modern surgical practice
Keywords: Accreditation, standards, criteria, outcomes, indicators, quality, transformation
References
- 1.Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation . 2002 National Health Accreditation Report. CCHSA; Ottawa: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scrivens E. Accreditation and the Regulation of Quality. In: Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E, editors. Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European Healthcare Systems. Open University Press; Buckingham: 2002. pp. 91–105. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. Second Edition. AIM: Achieving Improved Measurement Accreditation Programme; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brauer CM. Champions of Quality in Healthcare. Greenwich Publishing Group; Lyme, Connecticut: 2001. From Standardisation to the Creation of the joint Commission: 1910–1954; pp. 12–35. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ernst MF, Voogd AC, Coebergh JW, Roukema JA. Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening. Cancer. 2004;100(7):1337–1344. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hugosson J, Aus G, Lilja H, Lodding P, Pihl CG. Results of a randomised, population-based study of biennial screening using serum prostate-specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100(7):1397–1405. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Levin B, Smith RA, Feldman GE, Colditz GA, Fletcher RH, Nadel M. Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps: a framework for action: the strategic plan of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Cancer. 2002;95(8):1618–1628. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wolfson P. Teaching prevention in surgery-is it an oxymoron? Academic Medicine. 2000;75(7):S77–S84. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200007001-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dorner DB. Of cigarettes and surgeons. Am Surg. 1992;58(9):513–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jue NH, Cunningham SL. Stages of exercise behavior change at two time periods following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1998;13(1):23–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Warburton AL, Shepherd JP. Alcohol-related violence and the role of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in multi-agency prevention. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(6):657–663. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press; Washington, D.C.: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baker GR, Norton PG. Adverse events and patient safety in Canadian health care. CMAJ. 2004;170(3):353–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guru V, Gong Y, Rothwell DM, Tu JV. The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Canada in collaboration with the Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario; Toronto Ontario: 2003. Report on Cardiac Surgery in Ontario Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rogers J, Curtis P. The achievement of continuity of care in a primary care training programme. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:528–530. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.5.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]