Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2008 Oct 1;23(2):18–48. doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70031-4

The Politics of SARS – Rational Responses or Ambiguity, Symbols and Chaos?

Tom Christensen, Martin Painter
PMCID: PMC7128759  PMID: 32288637

Abstract

The main focus in this article is on the SARS event as a political process, involving political leaders, administrators and health professionals. How can we understand the reactions to SARS of some of the main actors and institutions? What aspects were they preoccupied with and did their definition of what SARS was all about change during the process? A selection of jurisdictions is chosen – China, the Hong Kong SAR, Canada and the World Health Organization – to explore these questions. The starting point is a view that the reactions cannot primarily be seen as an instrumental, based on rational, standard-operating-procedures (SOPs) and technical expertise, but may be better understood by a garbage can-perspective. From a review of the events as publicly reported, we find, as suggested by garbage can theory, that politicians’ and administrators’ responses to the SARS outbreak were a combination of competing rationalities and overlapping agendas. Critical decisions were triggered by extraneous factors and administrative actions were shaped by dramatic switches from one set of standard operating procedures to another, as events unfolded. The public health issues constantly vied with other agendas and only when compelling alignments among them occurred did professional or technical rationales for “solving the problem” become dominant.

References

  1. Allison G.T. Little, Brown; Boston: 1971. Essence of Decision. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beech Hannah. How Bad Is It? Time Asia Magazine. 2003 5 May. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brundtland G. Harlem. Award Lecture to the 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Chicago 16 September; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen T., Lægreid P. Ashgate; Aldershot: 2001. New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. [Google Scholar]
  5. CMAJ Editorial. Lessons from SARS. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2003 27 May, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl R.A., Lindblom C.E. Harper & Row; New York: 1953. Politics, Economics and Welfare. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fewsmith Joseph. China's Response to SARS. China Leadership Monitor. 2003 Summer (7) [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao Quang. Speech of Mr Gao Quang, Executive Vice Minister, Ministry of Health, People's Republic of China. WHO Global Meeting on SARS; Kuala Lumpur, 17 June; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Health Canada . Health Canada; Ottawa: 2003. Canadian SARS Numbers. 5 August. [Google Scholar]
  10. Health Canada . Health Canada; Ottawa: 2003. Update: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Toronto. 1 July. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoenig Henry. China turns on those who spread the news of SARS. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 2003 29 June. [Google Scholar]
  12. Knight Ridder Newspapers, and Washington Post. 2003. ‘China admits SARS cover-up; party leaders sacked.’ Seattle Times, 21 April.
  13. Lefkow Chris. More SARS deaths in China, Hong Kong as crisis enters second month. Agence France Presse. 2003 11 April. [Google Scholar]
  14. Link Perry. Will SARS Transform China's Chiefs? Time Asia. 2003 5 May. [Google Scholar]
  15. Macleans. 2003a, ‘Is this your best defence?’ 14 April.
  16. Macleans. 2003b. ‘Why Toronto, again? SARS Round Table: Ontario needs a better response system for SARS, say front-line experts.’ 9 June.
  17. March J.G., Olsen J.P. Universitetsforlaget; Bergen: 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moy Patsy, Heike Phillips. Infected doctor warned HK of virulent disease. South China Morning Post. 2003 26 March. [Google Scholar]
  19. National Post. 2003. ‘System's flaws contributed to spread of SARS: experts.’
  20. New York Times. 2003a. ‘The SARS Epidemic: The Researchers; Global Collaborations Bears Fruit As SARS Gives Up Some Secrets.’ 26 May.
  21. New York Times. 2003b. ‘As SARS Outbreak Took Shape, Health Agency Took Fast Action.’ 4 May.
  22. New York Times. 2003c. ‘WHO Expected to Gain Broader Powers.’ 28 May.
  23. New York Times. 2003d. ‘U.N. Health Agency's New Head Pledges Stronger Response to Epidemics Like SARS.’ 22 May.
  24. New York Times. 2003e. ‘The SARS Epidemic: Canada; Toronto Officials Seek End to Travel Advisory.’ 29 April.
  25. People's Daily Online. 2003. ‘Chinese new Government acts responsibly in combat against SARS.’ 30 April.
  26. Pomfret John. Disease forces Hong Kong schools closure. Washington Post. 2003 28 March. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rodier G.R.M. Why was Toronto included in the World Health Organization's SARS-related travel advisory? Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2003 27 May. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SARS Expert Committee . Hong Kong SAR Government; Hong Kong: 2003. SARS in Hong Kong: from Experience to Action, Summary Report. [Google Scholar]
  29. Simon H.A. Macmillan; New York: 1957. Administrative Behaviour. [Google Scholar]
  30. South China Morning Post. 2003a. ‘Editorial: Why we need to prepare for the worst.’ 2 April.
  31. South China Morning Post. 2003b. ‘Editorial: Launch an independent investigation.’ 27 May.
  32. South China Morning Post. 2003c. ‘Editorial: Under the microscope.’ 28 April.
  33. Staff Reporter in Beijing. Yeung Chris, Ann Benitez Mary. Outbreak began in Guangdong, WHO believes. South China Morning Post. 2003 22 March. [Google Scholar]
  34. Toronto . Press Release; 2003. City of Toronto disputes World Health Organization travel advisory. 22 April. [Google Scholar]
  35. WHA (World Health Assembly). 2003. Resolutions 56.28 and 56.29, 28 May.
  36. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003a. ‘Cumulative Number of Reported Probable Cases of SARS from November 1 2002 to July 1, 2003.’
  37. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003b. Revision of International Health Regulations. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Report by Secretariat. WHO 56th World Health Assembly. Provisional agenda item 14.16.
  38. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003c. ‘World Health Organization announces new public-private initiative on disease surveillance and response.’ 22 May, Press Release.
  39. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003d. ‘Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.’ 16 April, Press Briefing.
  40. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003e. ‘Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.’ 23 April, Virtual Press Briefing.
  41. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003f. ‘World Health Organization lifts Toronto travel advisory, maintains advice for areas of China.’ 30 April. Press Release.
  42. Xiong Lei. SARS is making a change. World Press Review. 2003;50(7) May 8, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu Yufang. China's Atypical Politics. Asia Times Online. 2003 24 April. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Policy & Society are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES