Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2019 Dec 11;15(4):584–591. doi: 10.1093/japr/15.4.584

Effect of Spray-Dried Plasma Form and Duration of Feeding on Broiler Performance During Natural Necrotic Enteritis Exposure

JM Campbell *,1, LE Russell *, JD Crenshaw *, HJ Koehnk
PMCID: PMC7128868  PMID: 32288458

Abstract

The effect of duration of feeding (continuous or discontinued after d 14) and form (granular vs. powder) of spray-dried plasma (SDP) on performance and mortality of broilers using used litter was evaluated with 240 Ross × Ross 308 male broilers (6 broilers per pen, 8 pens per treatment). Dietary treatments were control (no SDP) or SDP as powder or granular included in the pellet and fed continuously (d 0 to 35) or discontinued after d 14. During the experiment, broilers developed necrotic enteritis, and tissue cultures were positive for Escherichia coli and Salmonella, resulting in 50% mortality on control broilers. Addition of SDP to the feed improved (P < 0.05) average daily gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency for each period of the study (d 0 to 14, 15 to 28, 29 to 35, and 0 to 35). Continuous feeding of SDP improved (P < 0.05) average daily gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency from d 15 to 35 compared with broilers fed SDP to d 14. Liveability was improved (P < 0.05) in broilers consuming SDP either for 14 d or continuously throughout the experiment compared with control broilers. Spray-dried granular plasma was more effective than spray-dried powder plasma from d 0 to 14. The results of this experiment confirmed that SDP improved broiler growth rate, feed intake, feed efficiency, and minimized enteric challenge associated with necrotic enteritis with maximal protection afforded by continuous feeding. The response to SDP was independent of age of the broiler.

Key words: broiler, growth, spray-dried plasma, necrotic enteritis

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM

Feeding spray-dried plasma (SDP) to animals (pigs, poultry, calves, and pets) improves growth performance and health [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Spray-dried plasma is available in multiple forms, including powder, granules, or in a water-soluble form. Previous research [6] demonstrated that, in pigs, granulated SDP (Appetein) [7] improved growth performance to a greater extent than did powdered SDP (AP 920) [7]. However, no research has been reported comparing the efficacy of granulated SDP to powdered SDP in broilers.

When fed to pigs, SDP is generally fed during the first 1 to 2 wk postweaning [2] and is not typically fed thereafter. However, recent reports have suggested that SDP will improve growth performance of broilers [8] and pigs [9] in later phases of production. Thus, the objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of duration of feeding and form (granular vs. powder) of SDP on performance and mortality of broilers under simulated production conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Broilers used in the experiment were handled in accordance with published guidelines [10]. Two hundred forty 1-d-old Ross × Ross 308 male broilers (BW = 33.6 g) [11] were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 experimental treatments blocked by initial BW. Treatments included a control (no plasma) and 2 forms of SDP (powder, AP 920; granular, Appetein) fed continuously throughout the experiment or discontinued after d 14 (Table 1 ). Diets were formulated to meet or exceed nutrient requirements for broilers [12].

Table 1.

Experimental treatments

Treatment d 0 to 14 d 15 to 28 d 29 to 35
Control Control Control Control
Powder,1 continuous 1.0% 0.5% 0.25%
Powder, discontinued 1.0% Control Control
Granular,2 continuous 1.0% 0.5% 0.25%
Granular, discontinued 1.0% Control Control
1

Powder = spray-dried powder plasma (AP 920) [7].

2

Granular = spray-dried granular plasma (Appetein) [7].

The feeding program consisted of 3 phases, with starter from d 0 to 14, grower from d 15 to 28, and finisher from d 29 to 35 of the experiment. Spray-dried plasma [7] was produced according to standard manufacturing procedures and added at the rate of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25% in the starter, grower, and finisher diets, respectively. Feed was manufactured according to standard procedures at Kansas State University [13] (Table 2 ). In all diets, 1% fat was added before pelleting, with the remaining fat added after pelleting. Diets were pelleted at a 85°C conditioning temperature using a 0.40 × 3.18 cm die and a conditioning retention time of 15 s. Starter diets were crumbled. From d 0 to 3, feed was offered ad libitum in trays (729 cm2), followed by hanging gravity-flow feeders [14]. The hanging feeders were adjusted regularly to maintain optimal height for feed consumption. Water was delivered via free-standing 3.8-L poultry founts. The founts were washed daily and refilled with fresh water. Broilers (6 per pen; 8 pens per treatment) were housed in floor pens (56 × 122 cm). Pens contained soiled litter (softwood shavings used in 3 consecutive experiments), resulting in a high pathogen load environment. Following removal of broilers from the previous experiments, all pens were raked, allowed to dry (2 d), and caked dry litter was removed. The remaining litter was mixed with new litter and leveled to an average depth of 10 cm. Heat lamps maintained average temperatures at bird levels of 32, 29, 27, and 24°C for wk 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the end, respectively. Broilers were maintained on 23L:1D. Vaccinations prehatch were half a dose of Marek's and, before shipping, half a dose of Newcastle and Bronchitis. On d 7, all birds were vaccinated with Bursal Disease Vaccine [15] via the water, and on d 14, they were vaccinated with Newcastle-Bronchitis Vaccine [16] by coarse spray.

Table 2.

Formula and calculated analysis of diets on an as-is basis (%)

Starter (d 0 to 14)
Grower (d 15 to 28)
Finisher (d 29 to 35)
Item Control Plasma Control Plasma Control Plasma
Corn 57.66 59.23 60.12 60.91 65.43 65.82
Soybean meal, 47% 35.60 33.72 32.04 31.11 26.97 26.50
SDP1 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.25
Animal/vegetable fat 2.64 2.07 3.94 3.66 3.89 3.75
Dicalcium phosphate, 18.5% 1.76 1.69 1.63 1.59 1.56 1.54
Limestone 1.30 1.34 1.26 1.29 1.21 1.22
Vitamin/mineral premix2 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Coban 603 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Salt 0.47 0.39 0.47 0.43 0.47 0.45
dl-Met 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.18 0.13 0.12
l-Lys HCl 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Calculated nutrient analysis
 CP, % 21.5 21.5 20.00 20.00 18.00 18.00
 Fat, % 5.21 4.70 6.56 6.31 6.67 6.54
 ME, kcal/kg 3,050 3,050 3,150 3,150 3,200 3,200
 Ash, % 5.66 5.64 5.35 5.34 5.02 5.02
 Ca, % 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90
 P, % 0.70 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.63 0.63
 Inorganic P, % 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.40
 Na, % 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
 Lys, % 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.00
 Met, % 0.58 0.57 0.52 0.51 0.43 0.43
 Met +Cys, % 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.75
 Trp, % 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.25 0.25
 Thr, % 0.83 0.85 0.77 0.78 0.69 0.70
 Ile, % 1.10 1.08 1.02 1.01 0.90 0.90
1

SDP = spray-dried plasma (powder [AP 920] treatments 2 and 3 or granular [Appetein] treatments 4 and 5 [7]).

2

Vitamin/mineral premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: Mn, 100 mg; Zn, 100 mg; Fe, 50 mg; Cu, 11 mg; I, 1.5 mg; Se, 0.15 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 7,700 IU; cholecalciferol, 41.2 μg; vitamin E (α-tocopherol), 16.5 IU; vitamin B12, 11 μg; menadione, 0.8 mg; riboflavin, 6.6 mg; thiamine, 1.1 mg; d-pantothenic acid, 6.6 mg; niacin, 27.5 mg; vitamin B6, 1.4 mg; folic acid, 0.7 mg; choline, 385 mg; biotin, 0.03 mg.

3

The coccidiostat was Coban 60 (Elanco Animal Health, Indianapolis, IN) and provided 90 g of monensin Na per ton of feed.

Feed intake and mortality were measured daily. Pen weight was measured daily to d 7 and weekly thereafter. Individual BW were measured on d 0. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design using the GLM procedures of SAS [17]. Pen was the experimental unit, and placement within room of the facility was the blocking criterion. Least squares means were considered significantly different if P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The experiment was originally planned for 42 d; however, it was terminated on d 35 due to increasing mortality of control broilers. Mortality was the result of a natural challenge occurring in the facility. Broilers were necropsied by a trained pathologist and confirmed to have necrotic enteritis and cultured positive for Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Furthermore, the broilers were exhibiting rickets as a result of malabsorption from severe necrotic enteritis and had litter in the gizzard.

No interactions (P > 0.10) between duration of feeding (continuous or not) or form (powder vs. granular) of SDP were noted (Table 3 ). Compared with that of control broilers, the addition of SDP improved (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (gain:feed) at each period (d 0 to 14 and 0 to 35; Table 3). Likewise, compared with control broilers on d 35, SDP improved (P < 0.05) BW (Table 4 ) and liveability (Table 4; Figure 1 ).

Table 3.

Least squares means of performance when broilers consumed spray-dried plasma (SDP) in the feed1

Treatment
Control Powder, continuous Powder, discontinuous Granular, continuous Granular, discontinuous Contrasts2 (P-values)
Item 1 2 3 4 5 SEM 1 2 3 4
d 0 to 14
 ADG, g/d 19.21 25.97 24.61 25.97 26.96 0.54 0.0001 0.0372 NS
 ADFI, g/d 28.58 34.72 32.83 33.55 34.66 0.60 0.0001 NS NS
 Gain:feed 0.675 0.751 0.753 0.777 0.778 0.009 0.0001 0.0087 NS
d 15 to 28
 ADG, g/d 22.63 59.64 46.56 62.27 50.94 2.40 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 ADFI, g/d 45.10 94.57 79.74 97.57 87.15 3.04 0.0001 0.0983 0.0003 NS
 Gain:feed 0.489 0.631 0.581 0.639 0.581 0.013 0.0001 NS 0.0003 NS
d 29 to 35
 ADG, g/d 9.33 66.39 27.80 69.47 31.08 3.66 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 ADFI, g/d 46.29 132.93 80.97 136.43 90.26 5.37 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 Gain:feed 0.124 0.497 0.338 0.508 0.320 0.048 0.0001 NS 0.0011 NS
d 0 to 35
 ADG, g/d 19.18 47.05 34.10 48.88 37.33 1.69 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 ADFI, g/d 38.73 78.30 61.22 79.73 66.78 2.28 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 Gain:feed 0.502 0.609 0.558 0.619 0.560 0.009 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
1

Values represent the mean of 8 replicates per treatment with 6 broilers per pen. ADG = average daily gain; ADFI = average daily feed intake. NS = nonsignificant at P > 0.10. Powder = spray-dried powder plasma (AP 920) [7]; Granular = spray-dried granular plasma (Appetein) [7].

2

Contrasts were as follows: 1) control (treatment 1) vs. SDP (treatments 2, 3, 4, and 5); 2) Powder (treatments 2 and 3) vs. Granular (treatments 4 and 5); 3) SDP continuous feeding (treatments 2 and 4) vs. SDP discontinued feeding (treatments 3 and 5); 4) interaction of feeding duration and form of SDP (treatments 3 and 4 vs. 2 and 5).

Table 4.

Least squares means of BW and liveability when broilers consumed spray-dried plasma (SDP) in the feed1

Treatment
Control Powder, continuous Powder, discontinuous Granular, continuous Granular, discontinuous Contrasts2 (P-values)
Item 1 2 3 4 5 SEM 1 2 3 4
Day
 0 33.57 33.57 33.57 33.57 33.57 0.04 NS NS NS
 7 141.56 151.93 144.17 149.25 149.32 3.07 0.0475 NS NS
 14 304.09 396.60 379.45 398.86 410.96 7.77 0.0001 0.0382 NS NS
 21 456.22 779.18 722.05 780.48 792.71 20.46 0.0001 0.0895 NS NS
 28 640.08 1,239.79 1,032.99 1,267.72 1,129.24 38.04 0.0001 NS 0.0001 NS
 35 746.38 1,704.51 1,220.31 1,773.70 1,359.37 58.23 0.0001 0.0846 0.0001 NS
Liveability, % 56.25 93.75 89.58 93.75 93.75 4.37 0.0001 NS NS NS
1

Values represent the mean of 8 replicates per treatment with 6 broilers per pen. NS = nonsignificant at P > 0.10. Powder = spray-dried powder plasma (AP 920) [7]; Granular = spray-dried granular plasma (Appetein) [7].

2

Contrasts were as follows: 1) control (treatment 1) vs. SDP (treatments 2, 3, 4, and 5); 2) Powder (treatments 2 and 3) vs. Granular (treatments 4 and 5); 3) SDP continuous feeding (treatments 2 and 4) vs. SDP discontinued feeding (treatments 3 and 5); 4) interaction of feeding duration and form of SDP (treatments 3 and 4 vs. 2 and 5).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of spray-dried plasma (powder or granular) fed continuously (C) or not (D) on liveability (%).

Compared with that of broilers consuming powdered SDP, granulated SDP improved (P < 0.05) ADG and feed efficiency from d 0 to 14 and improved (P = 0.10) ADFI from d 15 to 28 (Table 3). Overall (d 0 to 35; Table 3), no differences (P > 0.10) were noted in ADG, ADFI, and feed efficiency due to different plasma forms (granular vs. powder). Granulation improved BW of broilers when measured on d 14 (P = 0.04), 21 (P = 0.09), and 35 (P = 0.08) compared with broilers consuming powder SDP (Table 4).

Continuous feeding of SDP improved (P < 0.05; Table 3) ADG, ADFI, and feed efficiency for each period (d 15 to 28, 29 to 35, and 0 to 35) compared with that of broilers when SDP was removed from the diet on d 14. Body weight was also improved (P < 0.05; Table 4) on d 28 and 35 when broilers continued to consume SDP compared with broilers when SDP was removed from the diet on d 14.

Average daily feed intake of control broilers was lower than that of SDP-fed broilers (P < 0.05) by d 9 and began to plateau by d 14 (Figure 2 ). Additionally, the removal of SDP from the diet on d 14 (discontinued treatments Powder/D and Granular/D; Figure 2) resulted in ADFI plateauing by d 20 but remaining significantly greater (P < 0.05) than control broilers. Average daily feed intake of broilers consuming SDP to d 35 (continuous treatments Powder/C and Granular/C; Figure 2) increased throughout the experiment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of spray-dried plasma (powder or granular) fed continuously (C) or not (D) on average daily feed intake (g/d).

Mortality of control broilers began to increase by d 15 of the experiment and continued through-out the experiment (Figure 1). Spray-dried plasma improved (P < 0.05) liveability, and the effect was independent (P > 0.10) of SDP form (powder or granular) or duration of feeding (continuous or not).

DISCUSSION

The present experiment was conducted to evaluate duration of feeding (continuous vs. discontinuous) and form of SDP (powder vs. granular) on broiler performance in simulated production conditions (using used litter from previous experiments). Consistent with data in previous reports, addition of SDP to the diets of poultry (broilers or turkeys) increased growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency compared with control [3, 4, 8].

The relative response to SDP is greater when animals are housed in a high antigen environment [3, 4, 8, 18]. In this experiment, the environment was contaminated as a result of continued litter use after 3 consecutive experiments, resulting in a high pathogen environment. The high pathogen environment was demonstrated by high chronic mortality (Figure 1) of control broilers and a progressively lower growth rate (Figure 3 ) of control broilers in the 4 consecutive experiments. In the current experiment, daily feed intake of control broilers increased to d 14 then plateaued after d 14 when mortality began to increase more rapidly.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Body weight of control broilers from 3 previous experiments (01 to 03C) and the current experiment (04C) in the same facility.

When the immune system is stimulated, metabolism is altered [19, 20, 21], resulting in reduced feed intake, growth rate, and protein accretion [22, 23, 24, 25]. Recent reports indicate that SDP prevents overstimulation of the immune system [26]. Many researchers have reported an initial growth response to plasma the first week after broiler placement or weaning of pigs but have not been able to detect a significant difference in final BW by the end of the experimental period, 3 to 6 wk later [27, 28, 29]. In the present experiment, the performance response to SDP continued throughout the 35-d experiment. This supports the hypothesis that SDP provides passive protection and prevents overstimulation of the immune system, lessening the effects of immune system activation on feed intake, growth, and protein accretion. This implies that the growth response to SDP is influenced more by the relative degree of immune stimulation rather than by the relative age of the animal.

Early nutrition influences intestinal and immune system development and has been shown to result in improved growth in subsequent phases [30, 31, 32]. When included in the diet, SDP has been shown to improve intestinal morphology [33, 34], digestive enzyme activity [35], and diet digestibility [36] in pigs and dogs. Furthermore, bursal weights were significantly heavier in SDP fed broilers compared with control [37], indicating an influence on immunocompetence. Following the removal of SDP (powder or granular) from the diet on d 14, ADFI (Figure 2) plateaued and remained greater than that of the control broilers throughout the experiment. This suggests that early consumption of SDP resulted in a broiler more resistant to the deleterious effects of a high pathogen environment due to improved intestinal health. Similar responses have been reported for pigs. Pigs fed SDP during the nursery phase had improved growth during the finishing phase [38].

This experiment did not involve a planned disease challenge. However, there was significant mortality, especially for the control broilers. After d 17 of the experiment, a postmortem examination by a trained pathologist was performed to determine the cause of mortality on all birds that died. Initial results of necropsy determined that broilers were experiencing enlarged spleens, indicative of immune stimulation from the Newcastle vaccine. Death losses were continually monitored, and results of the necrospy indicated that broilers developed necrotic enteritis and cultured positive for E. coli and Salmonella. Cultures were performed for Clostridium perfringens; however, it was not isolated. Broilers were also exhibiting rickets due to malabsorption from severe enteritis and had litter in the gizzard. Analysis of diets revealed no nutrient deficiencies. The addition of SDP to the drinking water reduced mortality of turkey poults challenged with Pasteurella multocida [5]. In addition, SDP has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality of animals challenged with Crytosporidium parvum [39], coronavirus [40], and E. coli [1] in calves; E. coli [33, 41, 42] and Salmonella [43] in pigs; Yersinia ruckeri in trout [44]; and white spot syndrome virus in shrimp [45]. In the present experiment, addition of SDP to the diet reduced mortality of birds housed in a high antigen environment.

Compared with powdered SDP, granulated SDP resulted in further improvements in growth rate and feed efficiency the first 2 wk of the experiment and increased BW from d 14 to the end of the experiment. When fed to pigs, granulated SDP has also been shown to be superior to powdered SDP [6]. In poultry, coarse ground grains induce gizzard motility, resulting in improved digestibility and feed efficiency [46]. In broilers, granulated SDP may induce more gizzard motility as well.

CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS

  • 1.

    The results of this experiment confirm data from previous research that SDP improves growth rate, feed intake, and feed conversion of broilers.

  • 2.

    The response to SDP is dependent on the degree of immune stimulation rather than the relative age of the broiler.

  • 3.

    Mortality is reduced in broilers with E. coli- and Salmonella-associated enteritis.

  • 4.

    Spray-dried granular plasma is more effective than spray-dried powder plasma.

Footnotes

Primary Audience: Veterinarians, Nutritionists, Commercial Poultry Producers

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Quigley J.D., III, Drew M.D. Effects of oral antibiotics or IgG on survival, health and growth in dairy calves challenged with Escherichia coli. Food Agric. Immunol. 2000;12:311–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coffey R.D., Cromwell G.L. Use of spray-dried animal plasma in diets for weanling pigs. Pig News Inf. 2001;22:39N–48N. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campbell J.M., Quigley J.D., III, Russell L.E., Kidd M.T. Effect of spray-dried bovine serum on intake, health, and growth of broilers housed in different environments. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:2776–2782. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112776x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campbell J.M., Quigley J.D., III, Russell L.E. Impact of spray-dried bovine serum and environment on turkey performance. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:1683–1687. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.10.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Campbell J.M., Quigley J.D., III, Russell L.E., Koehnk L.D. Efficacy of spray-dried bovine serum on health and performance of turkeys challenged with Pasteurella multocida. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2004;13:388–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weaver, E. M., J. M. Campbell, and L. Russell. Dec. 1999. US patent 6,004,576.
  • 7.AP 920 or Appetein, APC Inc., Ankeny, IA.
  • 8.Bregendahl K., Ahn D.U., Trampel D.W., Campbell J.M. Effects of dietary spray-dried bovine plasma protein on broiler growth performance and breast-meat yield. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2005;14:560–568. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell, J. M., J. D. Crenshaw, J. D. Quigley, J. Polo, and L. E. Russell. 2003. Effect of spray-dried plasma protein on pig performance, carcass value, and production economics in a wean-to-finish trial. Page 23 in Proc. Allen D. Leman Swine Conf., St. Paul, MN. Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  • 10.Federation of Animal Science Societies . Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. 1st rev. ed. FASS; Savoy, IL: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Welp Hatchery Inc., Bancroft, IA.
  • 12.National Research Council . Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press; Washington, DC: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manhattan, KS.
  • 14.Brower Manufacturing Co. Inc., Houghton, IA.
  • 15.Merial Select Inc., Gainsville, GA.
  • 16.B1 B1, live vaccine, Merial Select Inc., Gainesville, GA.
  • 17.SAS Institute . SAS/STAT User's Guide. 4th ed. SAS Inst. Inc.; Cary, NC: 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coffey R.D., Cromwell G.L. The impact of environment and antimicrobial agents on the growth response of early-weaned pigs to spray-dried porcine plasma. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;73:2532–2539. doi: 10.2527/1995.7392532x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johnson R.W. Inhibition of growth by pro-inflammatory cytokines: An integrated view. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;75:1244–1255. doi: 10.2527/1997.7551244x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klasing K.C., Korver D.R. Leukocytic cytokines regulate growth rate and composition following activation of the immune system. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;75(Suppl. 2):58–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kelly K.W. From hormones to immunity: The physiology of immunology. Brain Behav. Immunol. 2004;18:95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klasing K.C., Austic R.E. Changes in plasma, tissue, and urinary nitrogen metabolites due to an inflammatory challenge. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1984;176:276–284. doi: 10.3181/00379727-176-41871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klasing K.C., Austic R.E. Changes in protein degradation in chickens due to an inflammatory challenge. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1984;176:292–296. doi: 10.3181/00379727-176-41873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kent S., Bluthe R.M., Kelley K.W., Dantzer R. Sickness behavior as a new target for drug development. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1992;13:24–28. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90012-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kent S., Bret-Dibat J.L., Kelley K.W., Dantzer R. Mechanisms of sickness-induced decreases in food-motivated behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1996;20:171–175. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00037-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pérez-Bosque A., Pelegrí C., Vicario M., Castell M., Russell L., Campbell J.M., Quigley J.D., III, Polo J., Amat C., Moretó M. Dietary plasma protein affects the immune response of weaned rats challenged with S. aureus superantigen Br. J. Nutr. 2004;134:2667–2672. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hansen J.A., Nelssen J.L., Goodband R.D., Weeden T.L. Evaluation of animal protein supplements in diets of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1993;71:1853–1862. doi: 10.2527/1993.7171853x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yi G.F., Allee G.L., Frank J.W., Spencer J.D., Touchette K.J. Impact of glutamine, Menhaden fish meal and spray-dried plasma on the growth performance and intestinal morphology of broilers. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79(Suppl. 1):201. (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yi G.F., Allee G.L., Spencer J.D., Frank J.W., Gaines A.M. Impact of glutamine, Menhaden fish meal and spray-dried plasma on the growth performance and intestinal morphology of turkey poults. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79(Suppl. 1):201. (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dibner J.J., Knight C.D., Kitchell M.L., Atwell C.A., Downs A.C., Ivey F.J. Early feeding and development of the immune system in neonatal poultry. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1998;7:425–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Noy Y., Sklan D. Metabolic response to early nutrition. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1998;7:437–451. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Halevy O., Geyra A., Barak M., Uni Z., Sklan D. Early posthatch starvation decreases satellite cell proliferation and skeletal muscle growth in chicks. J. Nutr. 2000;130:858–864. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.4.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bosi P., Han I.K., Jung H.J., Heo K.N., Perini S., Castellazzi A.M., Casini L., Creston D., Gremokilini C. Effect of different spray dried plasmas on growth, ileal digestibility, nutrient deposition, immunity and health of early-weaned pigs challenged with E. coli K88. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;14:1138–1143. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bosi P., Casini L., Finamore A., Cremokolini C., Merialdi G., Trevisi P., Nobili F., Mengheri E. Spray-dried plasma improves growth performance and reduces inflammatory status of weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;82:1764–1772. doi: 10.2527/2004.8261764x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cain, C., 1995. Mode of action of spray-dried porcine plasma in weanling pigs. Pages 225–226 in Proc. Am. Assoc. Swine Pract., Omaha, NE.
  • 36.Quigley J.D., III, Campbell J.M., Polo J., Russell L.E. Effects of spray-dried animal plasma on intake and apparent digestibility in dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;82:1685–1692. doi: 10.2527/2004.8261685x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Campbell, J.M., 2004. APC Inc. Unpublished data.
  • 38.Slade, R. D., and H. M. Miller. 2000. Early post-weaning benefits of porcine plasma re-emerge in later growth performance. Page 120 in Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci., Scarborough, UK.
  • 39.Hunt E., Fu Q., Armstrong M.U., Rennix D.K., Webster D.W., Galanko J.A., Chen W., Weaver E.M., Argenzio R.A., Rhoads J.M. Oral bovine serum concentrate improves crytosporidial enteritis in calves. Pediatr. Res. 2002;51:370–376. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200203000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arthington J.D., Jaynes C.A., Tyler H.D., Kapil S., Quigley III J.D. The use of bovine serum protein as an oral support therapy following coronavirus challenge in calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:1249–1254. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74189-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Borg, B. S., J. M. Campbell, H. Koehnk, L. E. Russell, D. U. Thomson, and E. M. Weaver. 1999. Effects of a water soluble plasma protein product on weanling pig performance and health with and without Escherichia coli challenge. Pages 23–24 in Proc. Allen D. Leman Swine Conf., Minneapolis, MN. Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  • 42.Torrallardona D., Conde M.R., Badiola I., Polo J., Brufau J. Effect of fishmeal replacement with spray-dried animal plasma and colistin on intestinal structure, intestinal morphology, and performance of weanling pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K99. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:1220–1226. doi: 10.2527/2003.8151220x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Borg, B., 1999. APC Inc. Unpublished data.
  • 44.Campbell J.M. Vol. 6. APC Inc.; Ankeny, IA: 2003. (Evaluation of Biofend (spray-dried plasma) on growth and survival of rainbow trout (Oncohynchus mykiss) challenged with Yersinia ruckeri. Discoveries Technical Bulletin). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Russell L., Campbell J.M. Trials show promise for spray-dried plasma proteins in shrimp feeds. Advocate. 2000;3:42–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hetland H., Svihus B., Krogdahl A. Effects of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003;44:275–282. doi: 10.1080/0007166031000124595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Applied Poultry Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES