Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2007 May 9;34(3):275–284. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60029-0

Analysis of Synonymous Codon Usage in Aeropyrum pernix K1 and Other Crenarchaeota Microorganisms

Peng Jiang 1, Xiao Sun 1, Zuhong Lu 1,*
PMCID: PMC7129909  PMID: 17498625

Abstract

In this study, a comparative analysis of the codon usage bias was performed in Aeropyrum pernix K1 and two other phylogenetically related Crenarchaeota microorganisms (i.e., Pyrobaculum aerophilum str. IM2 and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius DSM 639). The results indicated that the synonymous codon usage in A. pernix K1 was less biased, which was highly correlated with the GC3S value. The codon usage patterns were phylogenetically conserved among these Crenarchaeota microorganisms. Comparatively, it is the species function rather than the gene function that determines their gene codon usage patterns. A. pernix K1, P. aerophilum str. IM2, and S. acidocaldarius DSM 639 live in differently extreme conditions. It is presumed that the living environment played an important role in determining the codon usage pattern of these microorganisms. Besides, there was no strain-specific codon usage among these microorganisms. The extent of codon bias in A. pernix K1 and S. acidocaldarius DSM 639 were highly correlated with the gene expression level, but no such association was detected in P. aerophilum str. IM2 genomes.

Keywords: codon usage bias, relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), Aeropyrum pernix K1

Footnotes

The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60121101).

References

  • 1.Ghosh T. Studies on codon usage in Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30(6):715–722. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8(1):49–62. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.1.197-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fickett JW. Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10(17):5303–5318. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.17.5303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lloyd AT, Sharp PM. Evolution of codon usage patterns: the extent and nature of divergence between Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(20):5289–5295. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.20.5289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Altay G, Bozoglu F, Ray B. Efficiency of gene transfer by conjugation and electroporation in Lactococci and Pediococci. Food Microbiol. 1994;11(4):265–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Medigue C, Rouxel T, Vigier P, Henaut A, Danchin A. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. J Mol Biol. 1991;222(4):851–856. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90575-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reeves P. Evolution of Salmonella O antigen by interspecific gene transfer on a large scale. Trends in Genetics. 1993;9(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90067-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karlin S, Mrazek J. What drives codon choices in human genes? J Mol Biol. 1996;262(4):459–472. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lesnik T, Solomovici J, Deana A, Ehrlich R, Reiss C. Ribosome traffic in E. coli and regulation of gene expression. J Theor Biol. 2000;202(2):175–185. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharp PM, Tuohy T, Mosurski K. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14(13):5125–5143. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.13.5125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gu WJ, Zhou T, Ma JM, Sun X, Lu ZH. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in SARS Coronavirus and other viruses in the Nidovirales. Virus Res. 2004;101(2):155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol. 1981;151(3):389–409. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicelluar organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gareth MJ, Edward CH. The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res. 2003;92(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(02)00309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chiusano ML, D'Onofrio G, Alvarez-Valin F, Jabbari K, Colonna G, Bernardi G. Correlations of nucleotide substitution rates and base composition of mammalian coding sequences with protein structure. Gene. 1999;238(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chiusano ML, Alvarez-Valin F, Di Giulio M, D'Onofrio G, Ammirato G, Colonna G, Bernardi G. Second codon positions of genes and the secondary structures of proteins. Relationships and implications for the origin of the genetic code. Gene. 2000;261(1):63–69. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00521-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gu WJ, Zhou T, Ma JM, Sun X, Lu ZH. The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure in Escherichia coli and Homo sapiens. Biosystems. 2004;73(2):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta SK, Majumdar S, Bhattacharya TK, Ghosh TC. Studies on the relationships between the synonymous codon usage and protein secondary structural units. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269(3):692–696. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oresic M, Shalloway D. Specific correlations between relative synonymous codon usage and protein secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1998;281(1):31–48. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xie T, Ding DF. The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure. FEBS Lett. 1998;434(1–2):93–96. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00955-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chiapello H, Ollivier E, Landes-Devauchelle C, Nitschke P, Risler JL. Codon usage as a tool to predict the cellular location of eukaryotic ribosomal proteins and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(14):2848–2851. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.14.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiapello H, Lisacek F, Caboche M, Henaut A. Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 1998;209(1–2):GC1–GC38. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00671-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma JM, Zhou T, Gu WJ, Sun X, Lu ZH. Cluster analysis of the codon use frequency of MHC genes from different species. Biosystems. 2002;65(2–3):199–207. doi: 10.1016/s0303-2647(02)00016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Richard JE, Lin K, Tan T. A functional significance for codon third bases. Gene. 2000;245(2):291–298. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00042-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kawarabaysi Y, Hino Y, Horikawa H, Yamazaki S, Haikawa Y, Jin-no K, Takahashi M, Sekine M, Baba S, Ankai A, Kosugi H, Hosoyama A, Fukui S, Nagai Y, Nishijima K, Nakazawa H, Takamiya M, Masuda S, Funahashi T, Tanaka T, Kudoh Y, Yamazaki J, Kushida N, Oguchi A, Aoki K, Kubota K, Nakamura Y, Nomura N, Sako Y, Kikuchi H. Complete genome sequence of an aerobic hyper-thermophilic crenarchaeon, Aeropyrum pernix K1. DNA Res. 1999;6(2):83–101. doi: 10.1093/dnares/6.2.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharp PM, Li WH. Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14(19):7737–7749. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.19.7737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wright F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Comeron JM, Aguade M. An evaluation of measures of synonymous codon usage bias. J Mol Evol. 1998;47(3):268–274. doi: 10.1007/pl00006384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gupta SK, Ghosh TC. Gene expressivity is the main factor in dictating the codon usage variation among the genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene. 2001;273(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00576-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Genetics and Genomics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES