Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 1998 Jul 26;28(4):679–691. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00006-X

Molecular and immunodiagnostic investigations on bovine neosporosis in Switzerland

B Gottstein a,∗, B Hentrich a, R Wyss a, B Thür b, A Busato c, KDC Stärk d, N Müller a
PMCID: PMC7130244  PMID: 9602392

Abstract

Neospora caninum has gained considerable attention through its role in the aetiology of bovine abortion. Due to its close phylogenetic relationship with Toxoplasma gondii, respective unequivocal differential diagnosis deserves special consideration. In order to evaluate the diagnostic performance of molecular and immunodiagnostic techniques and to provide insights into the epidemiological significance of bovine neosporosis in Switzerland, we conducted a study on 83 cases of bovine abortion: of these, 24 (29%) foetal brains were positive by Neospora-PCR, six of these foetuses were simultaneously seropositive in Neospora-IFAT and/or somatic antigen-ELISA. Conversely, four (5%) foetal brains were considered positive by Toxoplasma-PCR, two of which were also seropositive in the Toxoplasma-P30-ELISA and/or direct agglutination test. The seroprevalence in 1689 cattle sera obtained from 113 dairy farms was 11.5% (95% confidence interval: 9.2–13.8) by Neospora-somatic antigen-ELISA and 10.7% (95% confidence interval: 8.3–12.6) by Toxoplasma-P30-ELISA. From the same samples, 1.1%, less than statistically expected, were positive in both ELISA. Within selected groups of cow-calf farms, the seroprevalence determined using the Neospora-somatic antigen-ELISA was 14% (95% confidence interval: 5.0–23.0) for dams and 15% (95% confidence interval: 3.0–28.0) for offspring calves. Seroprevalences determined by Toxoplasma-P30-ELISA were 8% (95% confidence interval: 4.0–12.0) for dams and 3% (95% confidence interval: 0.3–6.0) for calves. None of the sera gave a positive reaction in both ELISA. Our data indicated that prenatal neosporosis appears as an important cause of bovine abortion in Switzerland.

Keywords: Neospora caninum, Neosporosis, Toxoplasma gondii, Toxoplasmosis, Abortion, Bovines, ELISA, PCR, IFAT

References

  • 1.Dubey JP, Lindsay DS. Neosporosis. Parasitol Today. 1993;9:452–458. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(93)90099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dubey JP, Lindsay DS. A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis. Vet Parasitol. 1996;9:452–458. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dubey JP, Carpenter JL, Speer CA, Topper MJ, Uggla A. Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988;192:1269–1285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anderson ML, Blanchard PC, Barr BC, Dubey JP, Hoffman RL, Conrad PA. Neospora-like protozoan infection as a major cause of abortion in California dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;198:241–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Paré J, Thurmond MC, Hietala SK. Congenital Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle and associated calfhood mortality. Can J Vet Res. 1996;60:133–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Soulsby EJL. 7th ed. Baillière Tindall; London: 1982. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ellis J, Luton K, Baverstock PR, Brindley PJ, Nimmo KA, Johnson AM. The phylogeny of Neospora caninum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994;64:303–311. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)00033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoar BR, Ribble CS, Spitzer CC, Spitzer PG, Janzen ED. Investigation of pregnancy losses in beef cattle herds associated with Neospora sp. infection. Can Vet J. 1996;37:364–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conrad PA, Sverlow K, Anderson M. Detection of serum antibody responses in cattle with natural or experimental neospora infections. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1993;5:572–578. doi: 10.1177/104063879300500412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cole RA, Lindsay DS, Dubey JP, Blagburn BL. Detection of Neospora caninum in tissue sections using a murine monoclonal antibody. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1993;5:579–584. doi: 10.1177/104063879300500413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Trees AJ, Guy F, Balfour AH, Dubey JP. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in a population of urban dogs in England. Vet Rec. 1993;132:125–126. doi: 10.1136/vr.132.6.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Björkman C, Liunden A, Holmdahl J, Barber J, Trees AJ, Uggla A. Neospora caninum in dogs: detecton of antibodies by ELISA using an iscom antigen. Parasit Immunol. 1994;16:643–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paré J, Hietala SK, Thurmond MC. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serological diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1996;7:352–359. doi: 10.1177/104063879500700310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Adams D.S. Serologic responses of cattle and other animals infected with Neospora caninum. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57:329–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thurmond MC, Hietala SK, Blanchard PC. Herd-based diagnosis of Neospora caninum-induced endemic and epidemic abortion in cows and evidence for congenital and postnatal transmission. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1997;9:44–49. doi: 10.1177/104063879700900108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ho MS, Barr BC, Marsh A.E. Identification of bovine Neospora parasites by PCR amplification and specific small-subunit rRNA sequence probe hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1203–1208. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1203-1208.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Payne S, Ellis J. Detection of Neospora caninum DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Int J Parasitol. 1996;26:347–351. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(96)00030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kaufmann H, Yamage M, Roditi I. Discriminatiom of Neospora caninum from Toxoplasma gondii and other apicomplexan parasites by hybridisation and PCR. Mol Nucl Prob. 1996;10:289–297. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1996.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamage M, Flechtner O, Gottstein B. Neospora caninum: specific oligonucleotide primers for the detection of brain “cyst” DNA of experimentally-infected nude mice by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) J Parasitol. 1996;82:272–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Longo MC, Berninger MS, Hartley JL. The use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1990;93:125–128. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90145-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Müller N, Zimmermann V, Hentrich B, Gottstein B. Diagnosis of Neospora sp. and Toxoplasma gondii by PCR and DNA-Hybridization Immuno-Assay (DIA) J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2850–2852. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2850-2852.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hemphill A, Gottstein B, Kaufmann H. Adhesion and invasion of bovine endothelial cells by Neospora caninum. Parasitol. 1996;112:183–197. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000084754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Conrad PA, Barr BC, Sverlow K.W. In vitro isolation and characterization of a Neospora sp. from aborted bovine foetuses. Parasitology. 1993;106:239–249. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000075065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gottstein B, Pozio E, Connolly B, Gamble HR, Eckert J, Jakob HP. Epidemiological investigation of trichinellosis in Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 1997;72:201–207. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stärk KDC, Frei-Stäheli C, Frei P.P. Häufigkei und Kosten von Gesundheitsproblemen bei Schweizer Milchkühen und deren Kälber (1993–1994) Schw Arch Tierheilkd. 1997;139:343–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Busato A, Steiner L, Gottstein B, Gaillard C. Häufigkeiten und Ursachen von Kälberverlusten und Kälberkrankheiten in Mutterkuhbetrieben. III. Seroprävalenz ausgewählter Krankheiten und Prävalenz von Endoparasiten beim Absetzen. Dtsch Tierärztl Wschr. 1997;104:191–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levy PS, Lemeshov S. John Wiley; New York: 1991. Sampling of populations, methods and applications. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dubey JP, Beattie CP. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1988. Toxoplasmosis of animals and man. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stenlund S, Björkman C, Holmdahl OJM, Kindahl H, Uggla A. Characterization of a Swedish bovine isolate of Neospora caninum. Parasitol Res. 1997;83:214–219. doi: 10.1007/s004360050236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barr BC, Anderson ML, Sverlow KW, Conrad PA. Diagnosis of bovine fetal Neospora infection with an indirect fluorescent antibody test. Vet Rec. 1995;137:611–613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blanchard PC, Hietala SK, Thurmond MC. Abstract Proc. 38th Ann. Meet. 1995. Diagnostic interpretation of Neospora serology; p. 40. (Am. Assoc. Vet. Lab. Diagn., Sparks, Nevada). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lally NC, Jenkins MC, Dubey JP. Evaluation of two Neospora caninum recombinant antigens for use in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of bovine neosporosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996;3:275–279. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.3.275-279.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES