Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2002 Nov 12;37(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(90)90020-C

Diagnosis of bovine cryptosporidiosis by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

B Robert 1, A Ginter 1, H Antoine 1, A Collard 2, P Coppe 2
PMCID: PMC7130500  PMID: 2238427

Abstract

This paper describes an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis. A monoclonal antibody with a high affinity against an oocyst antigen was used to set up the test.

The efficiency of this assay was compared with that of the flotation test; 275 calf faecal samples were examined by the two methods. There was 96% agreement between the two tests. For the 11 conflicting samples, the two tests were repeated and a modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining was performed on faecal smears. All these 11 samples contained few oocysts, but only five and six of them were shown to be positive by the ELISA and flotation tests, respectively. The degree of sensitivity of the ELISA and flotation tests is comparable; samples heavily or moderately contaminated with oocysts are detected by both methods. This ELISA is reliable and never gives rise to false positive results. Nevertheless, as with the flotation test, the occasional case containing very few oocysts will not always be detected by this test. If necessary, very accurate diagnosis can be made by a staining technique or by a direct immunofluorescent assay.

In veterinary medicine, the ELISA seems to be a method of choice; it appears to be a fast and reliable technique which could be used as a routine test for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts. Nevertheless the degree of sensitivity must always be borne in mind. There is no need for a microscopic examination, which is an additional advantage.

References

  1. Beauvais B., Sarfati C., Debrouin F., Garth J.F., Larivière M., Deletoille P. Evaluation comparative de deux méthodes de dépistage des oocysts de cryptosporidies dans les fèces humaines. Ann. Biol. Clin. 1989;47:45–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fayer R., Ungar B.L.P. Cryptosporidium sp and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiol. Rev. 1986;50:458–483. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.4.458-483.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fayer R., Ernst J.V., Miller R.G., Leek R.G. Vol. 52. 1985. Factors contributing to clinical illness in calves experimentally infected with a bovine isolate of Cryptosporidium; pp. 64–70. (Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash.). [Google Scholar]
  4. Garcia L.S., Brewer T.C., Bruckner D.A. Fluorescence detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in human fecal specimens by using monoclonal antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1987;25:119–121. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.1.119-121.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heine J., Boch J. Kryptosporidien-Infektionen beim Kalb Nachweis, Vorkommen und experimentelle Übertragung. Berl. Muench. Tieraerztl. Wochenschr. 1981;94:289–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henning D., Nielsen K. Peroxidase-labelled monoclonal antibodies for use in enzyme immunoassay. J. Immunoassay. 1987;8:297–308. doi: 10.1080/15321818708057029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henriksen S.A., Pohlenz J.F.L. Staining of Cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet. Scand. 1981;22:594–596. doi: 10.1186/BF03548684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jokipii L., Jokipii A.M.M. Timing of symptoms and oocyst excretion in human cryptosporidiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986;26:1643–1647. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612253152604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohler G., Milstein C. Continuous culture of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature (London) 1975;256:495–497. doi: 10.1038/256495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McLauchlin J., Casemore D.P., Harrison T.G., Gerson P.J., Samuel D., Taylor A.G. Identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts by monoclonal antibody. Lancet. 1987;8523:51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90753-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pohjola S., Lindberg L.A. Experimental cryptosporidiosis in mice, calves and chicken. Acta Vet. Scand. 1986;27:80–90. doi: 10.1186/BF03548561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Soave R., Johnson W.D. Cryptosporidium and Isospora belli infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1988;157:225–229. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.2.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sterling C.R., Arrowood M.J. Detection of Cryptosporidium sp infections using a direct immunofluorescent assay. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 1986;5:139–141. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198601001-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sterling C.R., Seegar K., Sinclair N.A. Cryptosporidium as a causative agent of traveler's diarrhea. J. Infect. Dis. 1986;153:380–381. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.2.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tzipori S., Smith M., Halpin C., Angus K.W., Sherwood D., Campbell I. Experimental cryptosporidiosis in calves: clinical manifestations and pathological findings. Vet. Rec. 1983;112:116–120. doi: 10.1136/vr.112.6.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ungar B.L.P., Soave R., Fayer R., Nash T.E. Enzyme immunoassay detection of immunoglobin M and G antibodies to Cryptosporidium in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. J. Infect. Dis. 1986;153:570–578. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.3.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wisher M.H., Rose M.E. Eimeria tenella sporozoites: the method of excystation affects the surface membrane proteins. Parasitology. 1987;95:479–489. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000057905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zierdt W.S. Concentrations and identification of Cryptosporidium sp by use of a parasite concentrator. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1984;20:860–861. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.860-861.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES