Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2003 Oct 3;34(3):281–294. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90113-V

An attempt at measuring health in nucleus and multiplier pig farms

Un essai a estimée le santee dans élevages de sélection et de multiplication

Ein versuch zur messung der gesundheit in nukleus- und vermehrungsbetrieben für schweine

F Madec 1, M Kobisch 1, Y Leforban 1,a
PMCID: PMC7131266  PMID: 32287874

Abstract

A pilot epidemiological inquiry was undertaken in France in a group of 205 nucleus and multiplier pig farms. The aim was to find out a method for a quantitative evaluation of the health level in farms selling young breeders. An exhaustive protocol was prepared for data collection. The sources of information were clinical inspections on the farms, meat inspection data at slaughter and laboratory investigations. Data processing issued in the selection of a profile made of 14 prevailing health indicators. These were then associated so as to set up a health index with an overall score. In a second phase, the relevance of the method with respect to disease transmission was assessed. The principle was a contact challenge within totally controlled facilities between SPF pigs hysterectomy-derived and gilts taken from farms with different health scores as previously checked. The contact lasted for 28 days. Eleven farms were chosen and in every one of them 7 gilts were sampled and 10 SPF pigs were assigned to each of these farms. All the pigs were submitted to a detailed observation. At the end of it the pigs were euthanized at the laboratory and checked to find out any lesions and infectious agents. A wide range of symptoms appeared among the SPF pigs. Mortality rate was 14.6%. Pneumonia affected 23.7% of them. A relationship was found between the germ transfer and the severity of the troubles. The degree of illness in SPF pigs was clearly related to the score obtained previously in the corresponding farms. Consequently, the method was considered as valid with respect to health evaluation.

Keywords: pig farms, epidemiology, health indicators

References

  1. Alexander T.J.L. Methods of disease Control. In: Leman A.D., Straw B., Glock R.D., Mengeling W.L., Penney R.H.C., Scholl E., editors. Diseases of swine. Iowa-State Univ. Press,; 1986. pp. 703–710. [Google Scholar]
  2. Avril J.L. Actinobacillus, Pasteurella. In: Le Minor dL., Veron M., editors. Medecine Sciences. 2e ed. 1989. pp. 505–544. Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bäckström L., Hoefling D.C. Transmission of atrophic rhinitis in swine under different environmental conditions. Agri-Pratice. 1986;7:23–27. [Google Scholar]
  4. Callebaut P., Debouck P., Pensaert M. Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the detection of the coronavirus-like agent and its antibodies in pigs with porcine Epidemic diarrhea. Vet. Microbiol. 1982;7:295–306. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(82)90009-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coles E.J. In: 2nd ed. Saunders W.B., editor. 1974. (Veterinary Clinical Pathology). Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowart R.P., Bäckström L., Brim T.A. Pasteurella multocida and Bordetella bronchiseptica in atrophic rhinitis and pneumonia in swine. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1989;53:295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabernet H., Sanson-Le Pors M.J. Haemophilus. In: Le Minor L., Veron M., editors. Medecine Sciences. 2nd ed. 1989. pp. 521–544. Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Jong M.F., Nielsen J.P. Definition of progressive atrophic rhinitis. Vet. Rec. 1990;126:93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijkhuisen A.A. Economic aspects of common health and fertility problems for the individual pig producer: an overview. Vet. Q. 1989;11:116–124. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1989.9694208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drummond A.J. Health requirements and problems. Pig. Vet. J. 1989;22:28–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis E.M., Williams J.E., Mallinson E.T., Snoeyenbos G.H., Martin W.J. Culture methods for the detection of animal salmonellosis and Arizonosis. In: Ellis E.M., editor. A manual of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians. Iowa State University Press,; Ames IA: 1976. pp. 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis P.R., James A.D. The economics of animal health II. Economics in farms practice. Vet. Rec. 1979;105:523–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans A.S. Causation and disease: a chronological journey. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1978;108:249–258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feinstein A.R. Hard science, soft data and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1977;22:485–498. doi: 10.1002/cpt1977224485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foged N.T., Nielsen J.P., Pedersen K.B. Differenciation of toxigenic from non toxigenic isolates of P. multocida by Elisa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988;7:1419–1420. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1419-1420.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin R.F.W., Whittlestone P. Monitoring for atrophic rhinitis: five years experience with a pilot control scheme. Vet. Rec. 1983;113:411–412. doi: 10.1136/vr.113.18.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heard T.W. Methods of approach to the diagnosis and resolution of pig health problems. Brit. Vet. J. 1981;137:337–347. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)31698-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hetzel B.S. The implications of health indicators: a comment. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1972;1:315–318. doi: 10.1093/ije/1.4.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holland W.N., Ipsen J., Kostrzewski I. W.H.O. regional publications. Europeans series No. 7,; Copenhagen: 1979. Measurement of level of health. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hommez J., Devriese L.A., Henrichsen J., Castryck F. Identification and characterization of Streptococcus suis. Vet. Microbiol. 1986;11:349–355. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(86)90065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jambu M., Lebeaux M.O. North Holland,; Amsterdam: 1983. Data analysis and cluster analysis. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenicek M., Cleroux R. Maloine ed.,; Paris: 1982. Epidemiologie: principes, techniques, applications. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lebart L., Morineau A., Warwick L. John Wiley ed.,; New-York: 1985. Multidimensional descriptive data analysis. [Google Scholar]
  24. Madec F., Fourichon C., Morvan P., Labbé A. Economie et sante en production porcine. INRA Prod. Anim. 1992;5:149–161. [Google Scholar]
  25. Madec F., Cariolet R., Leforban Y., Kobisch M. Etude expérimentale de la notion de pression de contamination dans les élevages porcins commercialisant des reproducteurs. Journées Rech. Porcine en France. 1991;23:141–152. [Google Scholar]
  26. Madec F., Robineau P., Querrec A., Pansart J.F. élements de situation sanitaire des élevages porcins de la région de Bretagne. 1 — Bilan lésionnel de l'appareil respiratoire des porcs à l'engrais. Journées Rech. Porcine en France. 1988;20:83–88. [Google Scholar]
  27. Madec F., Tillon J.P., Paboeuf F. Evaluation quantitative du niveau sanitaire des élevages porcins de sélection et de multiplication: les bilans sanitaires approfondis. Journées Rech. Porcine en France. 1990;22:297–306. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mengeling W.L. Porcine Parvovirus: Properties and prevalence of a strain isolated in the United States. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1972;33:2239–2248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Michel-Briand Y. Bordetella. In: Le Minor L., Veron M., editors. Medecine Sciences. 2nd ed. 1989. pp. 678–693. Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  30. Morrison R.B., Pijoan C., Hilley H.D., Rapp V. Microorganisms associated with pneumonia in slaughtered weight swine. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1985;49:129–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Muirhead M.R. The high health status herd. Pig Vet. J. 1989;22:38–49. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nicolet J., Paroz P. Tween 20 soluble proteins of M. hyopneumoniae as antigen for an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Res. Vet. Sci. 1980;29:305–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. O.I.E Manual of Recommended Diagnostic Techniques and Requirements for Biological Products. 1989;Vol l Transmissible Gastro-Enteritis, B/053. [Google Scholar]
  34. O.I.E Manual of Recommended Diagnostic Techniques and Requirements for Biological Products. 1991;Vol III Aujeszky's disease B/002. [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmer D.F., Coleman M.T., Dowdle W.R., Schild G.L. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Immunology series No. 6. Washington D.C,; 1975. Advanced laboratory techniques for influenza diagnosis. [Google Scholar]
  36. Skovgaard N. Prevention of micorbial contamination in the antemortem phase: the SPF (specific Pathogen-free) concept. In: Smulders F.J.M., editor. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1000 A.E.,; Amsterdam B.V: 1987. p. 3956. (Elimination of Pathogenic organisms from meat and Poultry.). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wagner D.P., Knaus W.A., Draper E.A. Statistical validation of a severity of illness measure. Am. J. Public Health. 1983;73:878–884. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.8.878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Livestock Production Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES