Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2005 May 26;52(6):1062–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.02.048

New and emerging infectious diseases

Dirk M Elston 1,
PMCID: PMC7132439  PMID: 15928626

Abstract

New and emerging diseases present a constant challenge. Globalization of business, international adoption, immigration, and tourism have contributed to the rapid spread of diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Infectious diseases that emerge in Africa or Asia may arrive on US shores within days. This article reviews the new and emerging pathogens important to dermatologists.


New and emerging diseases present a constant challenge. New pathogens are continually identified, the geographic patterns of disease shift constantly, and known pathogens continually change their patterns of sensitivity and disease manifestations. Tourism and globalization of business have exerted a profound impact on the spread of disease. Tropical and exotic diseases are becoming more common in western countries. The recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) demonstrated the potential for the worldwide spread of virulent diseases in a single season. Travelers often introduce the new pathogens before manifesting serious signs or symptoms, contributing to the global spread of disease.1 This article reviews the new and emerging pathogens important to dermatologists.

Bacterial infections

Antibiotic resistance among staphylococcal isolates is a growing problem in many regions. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is increasing in prevalence and is predominantly associated with skin and soft tissue infections.2, 3 Cutaneous abscesses and cellulites are particularly common.4, 5 CA-MRSA appears to be more virulent than methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA). In a prospective observational study of 812 US Army soldiers, the baseline prevalence of CA-MRSA colonization was 3%. Soft-tissue infections developed in 9 of the colonized individuals (38%). In contrast, 28% were colonized with MSSA, and only 8 of the latter group (3%) developed clinical infections.6

CA-MRSA strains generally share the presence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV in their genomes, but are genetically distinct from hospital acquired strains.7 Many strains share a common genotype and tend to affect healthy individuals with no known risk factors for nosocomial acquisition. A second group, consisting of two related genotypes, spa types 1 and 7, has been responsible for severe infections in HIV-positive patients in Los Angeles and New York.8

It is important to note that abscesses caused by CA-MRSA often respond to incision and drainage alone.2, 3 Antibiotic therapy (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with or without rifampin, tetracycline, vancomycin, or linezolid) is required for patients who do not respond to drainage and for all cases of cellulitis. Unfortunately, sensitivity to tetracycline and sulfa are often not reported by the laboratory. Some of the barriers to reporting are regulatory in nature and must be addressed. The newly formed Institute for Quality in Laboratory Medicine, a partnership representing the governmental and professional organizations involved in the establishment of benchmarks for quality in health care, has the potential to help address some of these issues. The American Academy of Dermatology, a member organization of the Institute for Quality in Laboratory Medicine, should act as a vocal advocate for our patients in seeking regulatory relief that would allow the reporting of all antibiotic sensitivities important to patient care.

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, is useful in skin and soft-tissue infections caused by MRSA.9 The drug is generally well tolerated; the predominant adverse effect is reversible thrombocytopenia. It may be superior to vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA, but some resistance to this drug is already developing.10 Resistance has been noted among Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus oralis and is typically associated with single-nucleotide changes in the genes encoding 23S ribosomal RNA.11 Because of its cost, and to slow the emergence of resistance to the drug, many clinicians advocate its use only in cases in which no suitable alternative is available.

Severe painful peripheral neuropathy has also been reported with linezolid therapy. Nerve conduction studies have shown mixed sensory-motor neuropathy. As of August 2004, 21 cases of severe peripheral and optic neuropathy had been reported. In most of the cases, the optic neuropathy resolved after linezolid was stopped, but peripheral neuropathy did not. Duration of therapy is the most important risk factor.12

Vancomycin-intermediate S aureus is now recognized as an important emerging pathogen. Vancomycin-intermediate S aureus infection with phenotypic susceptibility to methicillin has been described, reinforcing the importance of culture and sensitivity testing in high-risk patients and any infection unresponsive to initial therapy.13

Mupirocin remains a helpful agent for some patients with MRSA, but resistance is emerging. In New Zealand, where mupirocin was available over the counter from 1991 to 2000, mupirocin resistance among Staphylococcus spp is markedly higher than in other comparable countries. By 1999, resistance averaged 28%.14 This observation reinforces the importance of using antibiotics only for appropriate indications.

Virulent toxin-producing strains of group A β-hemolytic streptococci have reemerged as important pathogens.15 Streptococcal superantigens have been found that contribute to the toxic streptococcal syndrome. The strong resistance of group A streptococcus to phagocytosis appears to be related to factor H and fibrinogen binding by M protein and to disarming of complement component C5a by the C5a peptidase.16 There has also been a shift in the epidemiology of streptococcal skin infections, with facial erysipelas becoming less common, and leg infections predominating.

Streptococcal resistance has also emerged as an important problem. During the 2001 study year, the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program evaluated the resistance rates of β-hemolytic streptococci. Seven hundred eighty-seven isolates were studied, from 25 medical centers in North America. Strains included serogroups A, B, G , C, and F. Resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin was highest among group B isolates. Most of the resistant strains were M-phenotypes, and all of the isolates were susceptible to β-lactams, linezolid, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and the fluoroquinolones.17

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen, causing pneumonia, bacteremia, meningitis, urinary tract infections, and skin and soft tissue infections. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infections are being reported, and isolates resistant to almost all commercially available antimicrobials have been identified. Older compounds, such as polymyxins, and tetracycline may still be active, and ampicillin/sulbactam is effective in some of these patients.18

Bartonella spp cause cat scratch disease and bacillary angiomatosis, as well as culture-negative endocarditis and neuroretinitis. Spread of disease may be through the bite of a flea or body louse. Disease is especially prevalent among the homeless, those with HIV infection, and other immunosuppressed patients. Culture methods have improved, including promising results with liquid culture media, but serologic testing remains the cornerstone of clinical diagnosis. For testing purposes, Vero cell cocultivated antigens appear to provide higher sensitivity and specificity when compared with agar-derived antigens.19 Molecular techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), offer high sensitivity and may establish the diagnosis when other tests have failed.

Like Bartonella quintana, B koehlerae has been reported to be a cause of culture-negative endocarditis. Like B henselae, this pathogen is carried by domestic cats. Modifications in the commonly used PCR techniques are needed to distinguish between B koehlerae and B henselae. Specifically, PCR analysis must target several genes and be coupled with DNA sequencing to avoid species misidentification.20

Although B henselae infection is strongly associated with cats, a severe protracted illness was recently reported in an otherwise healthy police dog handler.21 Although the infection may occur in both dogs and cats, in cats, B henselae bacteremia often persists for years, whereas in dogs long-term bacteremia is uncommon.22 This difference probably accounts for the greater epidemiologic association between cats and clinical infection in humans.

Vibrio vulnificus infections typically occur in patients with preexisting liver disease, especially cirrhosis, or in the setting of diabetes mellitus. Patients may present with cellulitis or bullae. Consumption of raw or undercooked shellfish is the most common means of acquiring the infection, but infections have also been reported after cutaneous injuries contaminated with brackish water. Recently, there has been evidence for prolonged survival of the bacteria on the skin (at least 24 hours), with invasive infection reported after a puncture injury on dry land.23

Mycobacterium fortuitum has established itself as an emerging pathogen in patients with AIDS. The infection often occurs late in the course of AIDS, and 9 of 11 patients in a recent series presented with cervical lymphadenitis; two had disseminated infection.24 Erroneous identification of M fortuitum as Nocardia spp is a potential pitfall that can lead to a serious delay in appropriate therapy.

There has been a shift in the prevalence of mycobacteria causing cervical lymphadenitis in children, with a shift from Mycobacterium scrofulaceum to Mycobacterium avium. This shift may be related to widespread chlorination of water selecting more resistant environmental mycobacteria.25 Mycobacterium interjectum has also recently been reported as an important cause of cervical lymphadenitis in otherwise healthy young children.26

The re-emergence of tuberculosis has special significance for dermatologists because cutaneous manifestations will first be seen in the outpatient setting. Conditions such as lupus vulgaris and erythema induratum have become rare in the United States, but with the resurgence of tuberculosis worldwide, these conditions will become more common. Factors that have contributed to the re-emergence of tuberculosis include urban crowding, immigration, rural-to-urban migration, and the social disruption caused by war and civil conflicts.27

Rickettsial infections

The vast majority of cases of tick-borne rickettsiosis in international travelers are African tick bite fever caused by Rickettsia africae and Mediterranean spotted fever caused by Rickettsia conorii. Most travelers present with a flu-like illness and do not recall a preceding tick bite.28 The attack rate among travelers is substantial. In a study of 940 travelers to rural sub-Equatorial Africa, African tick bite fever developed in 4.0%. This accounted for 26.6% of those reporting flu-like symptoms. More than 80% had fever, headache, and/or myalgia. Cutaneous signs such as eschars, lymphadenitis, or rash were present in less than 50% of the patients.29 Both diseases respond to doxycycline.

Human anaplasmosis (HA, formerly called human granulocytic ehrlichiosis) is caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) is caused by Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Both are emerging tick-borne infections caused by obligate intracellular bacteria in the family Anaplasmataceae. The organisms are closely related to the Rickettsiae spp. HA is carried by Ixodes ticks and HME by Amblyomma ticks. Most patients present with fever and variable signs and symptoms, including headache, myalgia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Meningoencephalitis is common with HME, but not with HA. This appears to be because infected host monocytes cross the central nervous system endothelial cell barriers 6 times more efficiently than neutrophils.30

Molecular taxonomic methods have led to the reclassification of many organisms. Recently, Orientia tsutsugamushi, the agent responsible for scrub typhus, was removed from the genus Rickettsia. There are an estimated 1,000,000 cases of scrub typhus annually, and the disease is re-emerging in Japan, where serious pneumonitis occurs in up to 22% of patients.31 Any patient with fever and an eschar should be evaluated for rickettsial-type diseases.

Viral infections

SARS began in rural China, but spread worldwide in a single season, demonstrating the vulnerability of the world population to the spread of new diseases. Overall, the mortality rate was approximately 10%.32 Recently outbreaks of measles have been reported in Chinese orphanages, and children adopted from Chinese orphanages have brought measles to the United States on commercial airlines.31 Measles may also be brought back to the United States by tourists and students traveling to areas where the disease is more prevalent. Because of this risk, and to prevent school outbreaks of measles, there was a change in recommendations for measles vaccination in the United States in 1989, with a series of two injections currently recommended. The two-dose strategy has been shown to be effective in reducing the measles risk in the United States.33 Avian influenza has emerged as a major public health threat in Asia. Like measles and SARS, it may spread rapidly to other continents.34

West Nile virus is transmitted by Culex mosquitoes. Most infections are asymptomatic, and encephalitis is more likely in older patients. West Nile encephalitis was first identified in New York City in 1999. The initial outbreak included 62 human cases of West Nile virus infection with 7 deaths. In 2002, there were 4156 human cases of infection, with 284 fatalities.35 The disease can be acquired through organ transplantation, blood transfusion, breast milk, transplacental transmission, and occupational exposure. A variable exanthem is noted in 19% of patients.36

The Nipah virus, a virulent paramyxovirus, was first isolated during a large outbreak of viral encephalitis in Malaysia. It has been identified as a potential bioterrorism agent. Fruit bats are the reservoir for natural infection and probably introduced the virus to pig farms in Malaysia. The virus spreads quickly among pigs and can spread from them to dogs, cats, horses, and humans.37 Morbidity and mortality are principally related to a systemic vasculitis with widespread thrombotic occlusion and microinfarction in most major organs, including the central nervous system.38 Although the major symptoms are fever, headache, and giddiness followed by coma, cutaneous vasculitis is also possible.

During the summer of 2003, an outbreak of human monkeypox occurred in the Midwest states. The disease was imported in African animals and transmitted to other animals, including prairie dogs that were sold as pets throughout the Midwest.39

Parvovirus B19 is associated with fifth disease, fetal loss, aplastic crisis in those with chronic hemolytic anemia, chronic arthritis, purpuric gloves-and-socks syndrome, and severe illness in immunocompromised patients.40 Because parvovirus B19 is emerging as an important disease in immunocompromised patients, blood screening has been proposed for donations to high-risk groups.

During the summer of 2002, a large outbreak of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis caused by coxsackievirus A24 occurred in South Korea.41 Given the widespread nature of the infection, it is likely to surface in other locations.

Lassa fever is carried by rodents and rarely reported outside of Africa. The illness is characterized by fever, muscle aches, sore throat, nausea, vomiting, chest pain, and abdominal pain. As with West Nile fever, approximately 80% of human infections with Lassa virus are mild or asymptomatic. The overall death rate is 1%, but 15% to 20% of those sick enough to be hospitalized for Lassa fever die. Widespread cutaneous hemorrhage may occur as the disease progresses. In August 2004, a 38-year-old man in New Jersey died of Lassa fever after returning from travel to West Africa.42 Delays in accurate diagnosis could result in spread of the disease. Identification and reporting of virulent imported viral illnesses are important to limit spread of the pathogen.

Tanapox is endemic to East Africa, but has recently been reported in a European traveler and an American student who worked with orphaned chimpanzees in Africa.43 The lesions present as umbilicated nodules with an erythematous halo. The diagnosis can be confirmed by electron microscopy or a tanapox virus–specific PCR assay.44

Dengue fever has re-entered the United States; it originally entered across the Mexican border in Texas.45 Aedes aegypti has a widespread distribution in the southern United States, and Aedes albopictus mosquito populations have been identified in Florida, Georgia, and Illinois.46 The transmission patterns are likely to evolve over the coming years. Although the cutaneous manifestations usually consist of nonspecific macular or morbilliform exanthems,47 infection with a second strain of Dengue can produce Dengue hemorrhagic fever.

Hepatitis C has emerged as a viral disease that often presents with cutaneous manifestations. Porphyria cutanea tarda and mixed cryoglobulinemia are the most common manifestations, but other possible associations include atypical presentations of lichen planus, pruritus, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, rheumatoid disorders, thrombocytopenia, sialadenitis, thyroid disease, and various neurologic disorders.48

Fungal infections

Recently, there has been evidence that the rising rate of Candida bloodstream infections in hospitalized and immunosuppressed patients may be reversing.49 Invasive aspergillosis and other mold infections, such as fusariosis, have emerged as important pathogens, especially in the transplant population. Non–Candida albicans spp are also emerging as important pathogens, in particular Candida glabrata.39 Atypical presentations of Candida infections, as well as dermatophytosis and Malassezia infection, are common in the setting of transplantation.50 Cutaneous manifestations are protean and include eschars with scalloped margins, ulcers, cellulitis, and morbilliform rash.

Aspergillus terreus is emerging as an important fungal pathogen.51 Infections with this pathogen are often lethal, as it is refractory to amphotericin B. Posaconazole and itraconazole have been shown to reduce the residual fungal burden in infected patients and improve survival.52

Biofilms are implicated as a mechanism for fungal resistance. Biofilms often form on indwelling catheters and may be a reason why catheter-related sepsis is often refractory to standard therapy. Drug efflux pumps may be up-regulated at the surface of the biofilm. In this setting, lipid formulation of amphotericin and echinocandins perform better than other drugs.53

Caspofungin, the first echinocandin available in the United States, has potent candidacidal activity. It also has demonstrated clinical efficacy in aspergillosis refractory to other available therapy. Two other echinocandins, micafungin and anidulafungin, are also available as intravenous formulations. They appear to be well tolerated with few adverse events and drug interactions. All have potent anticandidal activity. Anidulafungin is also highly active against Aspergillus.54

Voriconazole, the first second-generation triazole to become available in the United States, is available in intravenous and oral forms. It is effective for the primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis and for salvage therapy for yeasts and other molds. In the setting of invasive aspergillosis, voriconazole has demonstrated a survival benefit over amphotericin B.55 In high-risk patients whose infections failed to respond to previous antifungal therapy, voriconazole showed efficacy rates of 43.7% for aspergillosis, 57.5% for candidiasis, 38.9% for cryptococcosis, 45.5% for fusariosis, and 30% for scedosporiosis.56 Side effects include visual adverse events, hepatic enzyme elevation, cutaneous reactions, and drug interactions.

The biologicals represent an important new group of therapeutic agents for inflammatory skin disease. In general, all of these agents are very well tolerated, but the potential for serious infection is a recognized risk. Some alternative immunosuppressive drugs have antifungal properties. Specifically, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and rapamycin (sirolimus) have potent antifungal effects against a variety of pathogenic fungi. Antifungicidal synergism has been described between the azoles and the calcineurin inhibitors, and animal studies have demonstrated a therapeutic benefit in the setting of fungal infection.57 It is intriguing to imagine the effects of combination induction therapy for psoriasis using both a biological and a calcineurin inhibitor. The potential for additive toxicity would have to be weighed against any potential antifungal benefits.

Human pythiosis is caused by the fungus-like aquatic organism Pythium insidiosum, an aquatic oomycete. Pythiosis can present as localized disease and has systemic and vasculotropic forms. Skin lesions may appear as cellulitis, infarctive, or ulcerative. Arterial pythiosis is usually seen in association with an underlying hematologic disorder, such as thalassemia or aplastic anemia. Arterial pythiosis is characterized by ascending blood vessel involvement and thrombosis of the major arteries of the legs. As the organism is resistant to most antifungal drugs, the death rate is high. Immunotherapy with P insidiosum antigen has recently been used successfully in some patients.58

Protozoan infections

In the past two decades, visceral leishmaniasis has emerged as an opportunistic disease, particularly in HIV-infected patients in southern Europe.59 Dogs serve as the principal reservoir of disease. Recently, visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum has emerged as a widespread zoonotic infection of foxhounds in the United States and parts of Canada.60 The potential for human disease exists, as sandfly vectors, such as Lutzomyia vexator, have recently been identified as far north as upstate New York.61

Human cutaneous leishmaniasis, long endemic to South Texas, has recently been reported as far north as Pennsylvania in a patient with no travel history (personal observation and Centers for Disease and Control investigation initiated by William Tyler, MD). Leishmania mexicana has recently been identified in white-throated wood rats in Pima County, Arizona.62 Various forms of leishmaniasis may emerge as important diseases with a widespread distribution in the United States. Cutaneous leishmaniasis will also be seen in many American soldiers returning from Iraq.

Conclusion

Emerging infections appear continuously in developed countries and globally. Given the potential for rapid spread of virulent organisms and the potential use of some of these organisms for biological terrorism, surveillance is critical. Early warning systems have been designed that aggregate data from emergency room visits, private-practice billing codes, and veterinary practices with data on absenteeism, nurse hotline calls, and the purchase of medications. Together, the data could provide early warning of the use of a biological weapon or predict the start of an epidemic. The Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE) is one such surveillance system that operates in the Washington DC area.63 The ESSENCE system is an early step in what should ultimately be a global network to track unusual and emerging pathogens.

Danville, Pennsylvania

Footnotes

Reprints not available from the author.

References

  • 1.Wilson M.E. The traveller and emerging infections: sentinel, courier, transmitter. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(Suppl):1S–11S. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eady E.A., Cove J.H. Staphylococcal resistance revisited: community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus—an emerging problem for the management of skin and soft tissue infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:103–124. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200304000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cohen P.R., Grossman M.E. Management of cutaneous lesions associated with an emerging epidemic: community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:132–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cohen P.R., Kurzrock R. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infection: an emerging clinical problem. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:277–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iyer S., Jones D.H. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infection: a retrospective analysis of clinical presentation and treatment of a local outbreak. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:854–858. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ellis M.W., Hospenthal D.R., Dooley D.P., Gray P.J., Murray C.K. Natural history of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in soldiers. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:971–979. doi: 10.1086/423965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vandenesch F., Naimi T., Enright M.C., Lina G., Nimmo G.R., Heffernan H. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:978–984. doi: 10.3201/eid0908.030089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Said-Salim B., Mathema B., Kreiswirth B.N. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging pathogen. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:451–455. doi: 10.1086/502231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plouffe J.F. Emerging therapies for serious gram-positive bacterial infections: a focus on linezolid. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(Suppl 4):S144–S149. doi: 10.1086/314080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chopra I. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: concerns, causes and cures. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2003;1:45–55. doi: 10.1586/14787210.1.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meka V.G., Gold H.S. Antimicrobial resistance to linezolid. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1010–1015. doi: 10.1086/423841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bressler A.M., Zimmer S.M., Gilmore J.L., Somani J. Peripheral neuropathy associated with prolonged use of linezolid. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:528–531. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naimi T.S., Anderson D., O'Boyle C., Boxrud D.J., Johnson S.K., Tenover F.C. Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus with phenotypic susceptibility to methicillin in a patient with recurrent bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1609–1612. doi: 10.1086/375228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Upton A., Lang S., Heffernan H. Mupirocin and Staphylococcus aureus: a recent paradigm of emerging antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:613–617. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Krause R.M. Evolving microbes and re-emerging streptococcal disease. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22:835–848. doi: 10.1016/s0272-2712(02)00027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cunningham M.W. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:470–511. doi: 10.1128/cmr.13.3.470-511.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biedenbach D.J., Stephen J.M., Jones R.N. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile among beta-haemolytic Streptococcus spp. collected in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program—North America, 2001. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;46:291–294. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jain R., Danziger L.H. Multidrug-resistant acinetobacter infections: an emerging challenge to clinicians. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1449–1459. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agan B.K., Dolan M.J. Laboratory diagnosis of Bartonella infections. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22:937–962. doi: 10.1016/s0272-2712(02)00017-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Avidor B., Graidy M., Efrat G., Leibowitz C., Shapira G., Schattner A. Bartonella koehlerae, a new cat-associated agent of culture-negative human endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3462–3468. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3462-3468.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schiellerup P., Krogfelt K.A., Andersen A.B. Bartonella henselae causing severe and protracted illness in an otherwise healthy person. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:316–318. doi: 10.1080/00365540410019516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chomel B.B., Kasten R.W., Sykes J.E., Boulouis H.J., Breitschwerdt E.B. Clinical impact of persistent Bartonella bacteremia in humans and animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:267–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Colodner R., Chazan B., Kopelowitz J., Keness Y., Raz R. Unusual portal of entry of Vibrio vulnificus: evidence of its prolonged survival on the skin. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:714–715. doi: 10.1086/338871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith M.B., Schnadig V.J., Boyars M.C., Woods G.L. Clinical and pathologic features of Mycobacterium fortuitum infections. An emerging pathogen in patients with AIDS. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116:225–232. doi: 10.1309/HF2V-E8WV-PX4Q-CHQH. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Primm T.P., Lucero C.A., Falkinham J.O., 3rd Health impacts of environmental mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:98–106. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.98-106.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rose M., Kitz R., Mischke A., Enzensberger R., Schneider V., Zielen S. Lymphadenitis cervicalis due to Mycobacterium interjectum in immunocompetent children. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:424–426. doi: 10.1080/08035250410023025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weiss R.A., McMichael A.J. Social and environmental risk factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nat Med. 2004;10(Suppl 12):S70–S76. doi: 10.1038/nm1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jensenius M., Fournier P.E., Raoult D. Tick-borne rickettsioses in international travellers. Int J Infect Dis. 2004;8:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2003.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jensenius M., Fournier P.E., Vene S., Hoel T., Hasle G., Henriksen A.Z., for the Norwegian African Tick Bite Fever Study Group African tick bite fever in travelers to rural sub-Equatorial Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1411–1417. doi: 10.1086/375083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park J., Choi K.S., Grab D.J., Dumler J.S. Divergent interactions of Ehrlichia chaffeensis– and Anaplasma phagocytophilum–infected leukocytes with endothelial cell barriers. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6728–6733. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.6728-6733.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watt G., Parola P. Scrub typhus and tropical rickettsioses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:429–436. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200310000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Krilov L.R. Emerging infectious disease issues in international adoptions: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), avian influenza and measles. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17:391–395. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vitek C.R., Aduddell M., Brinton M.J., Hoffman R.E., Redd S.C. Increased protections during a measles outbreak of children previously vaccinated with a second dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:620–623. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199907000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kaye D., Pringle C.R. Avian influenza viruses and their implication for human health. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:108–112. doi: 10.1086/427236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goetz A.M., Goldrick B.A. West Nile virus: a primer for infection control professionals. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klein C., Kimiagar I., Pollak L., Gandelman-Marton R., Itzhaki A., Milo R. Neurological features of West Nile virus infection during the 2000 outbreak in a regional hospital in Israel. J Neurol Sci. 2002;200:63–66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lam S.K. Nipah virus—a potential agent of bioterrorism? Antiviral Res. 2003;57:113–119. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wong K.T., Shieh W.J., Kumar S., Norain K., Abdullah W., Guarner J., for the Nipah Virus Pathology Working Group Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:2153–2167. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64493-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.West K. Monkeypox: a first for the United States. Emerg Med Serv. 2003;32:130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Corcoran A., Doyle S. Advances in the biology, diagnosis and host-pathogen interactions of parvovirus B19. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:459–475. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05485-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oh M.D., Park S., Choi Y., Kim H., Lee K., Park W. Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis caused by coxsackievirus A24 variant, South Korea, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1010–1012. doi: 10.3201/eid0908.030190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Imported Lassa fever—New Jersey, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:894–897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dhar A.D., Werchniak A.E., Li Y., Brennick J.B., Goldsmith C.S., Kline R. Tanapox infection in a college student. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:361–366. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stich A., Meyer H., Kohler B., Fleischer K. Tanapox: first report in a European traveller and identification by PCR. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:178–179. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90295-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Weinberg M., Waterman S., Lucas C.A., Falcon V.C., Morales P.K., Lopez L.A. The U.S.-Mexico Border Infectious Disease Surveillance project: establishing bi-national border surveillance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:97–102. doi: 10.3201/eid0901.020047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lourenco de Oliveira R., Vazeille M., de Filippis A.M., Failloux A.B. Large genetic differentiation and low variation in vector competence for dengue and yellow fever viruses of Aedes albopictus from Brazil, the United States, and the Cayman Islands. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:105–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Desruelles F., Lamaury I., Roudier M., Goursaud R., Mahe A., Castanet J. Cutaneomucous manifestations of dengue. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1997;124:237–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Medina J., Garcia-Buey L., Moreno-Otero R. Hepatitis C virus-related extra-hepatic disease—aetiopathogenesis and management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:129–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Clark T.A., Hajjeh R.A. Recent trends in the epidemiology of invasive mycoses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2002;15:569–574. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200212000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Virgili A., Zampino M.R., Mantovani L. Fungal skin infections in organ transplant recipients. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:19–35. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200203010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baddley J.W., Pappas P.G., Smith A.C., Moser S.A. Epidemiology of Aspergillus terreus at a university hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5525–5529. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5525-5529.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walsh T.J., Petraitis V., Petraitiene R., Field-Ridley A., Sutton D., Ghannoum M. Experimental pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus terreus: pathogenesis and treatment of an emerging fungal pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:305–319. doi: 10.1086/377210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jabra-Rizk M.A., Falkler W.A., Meiller T.F. Fungal biofilms and drug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:14–19. doi: 10.3201/eid1001.030119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Raasch R.H. Anidulafungin: review of a new echinocandin antifungal agent. Exp Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2004;2:499–508. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2.4.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Boucher H.W., Groll A.H., Chiou C.C., Walsh T.J. Newer systemic antifungal agents: pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy. Drugs. 2004;64:1997–2020. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464180-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Perfect J.R., Marr K.A., Walsh T.J., Greenberg R.N., DuPont B., de la Torre-Cisneros J. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1122–1131. doi: 10.1086/374557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Blankenship J.R., Steinbach W.J., Perfect J.R., Heitman J. Teaching old drugs new tricks: reincarnating immunosuppressants as antifungal drugs. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2003;4:192–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wanachiwanawin W., Mendoza L., Visuthisakchai S., Mutsikapan P., Sathapatayavongs B. Efficacy of immunotherapy using antigens of Pythium insidiosum in the treatment of vascular pythiosis in humans. Vaccine. 2004;22:3613–3621. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Choi C.M., Lerner E.A. Leishmaniasis as an emerging infection. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2001;6:175–182. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.00038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rosypal A.C., Tory G.C., Zajac A.M., Duncan R.B., Jr., Waki K., Chang K.P. Emergence of zoonotic canine leishmaniasis in the United States: isolation and immunohistochemical detection of Leishmania infantum from foxhounds from Virginia. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2003;50(Suppl):691–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ostfeld R.S., Roy P., Haumaier W., Canter L., Keesing F., Rowton E.D. Sand fly (Lutzomyia vexator) (Diptera: Psychodidae) populations in upstate New York: abundance, microhabitat, and phenology. J Med Entomol. 2004;41:774–778. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-41.4.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kerr S.F., McHugh C.P., Merkelz R. Short report: a focus of Leishmania mexicana near Tucson, Arizona. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:378–379. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lombardo J., Burkom H., Elbert E., Magruder S., Lewis S.H., Loschen W. A systems overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE II) J Urban Health. 2003;80(2 Suppl 1):i32–i42. doi: 10.1007/PL00022313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES