Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2007 Feb 1;63(1):74–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.12.007

Has SARS infected the property market? Evidence from Hong Kong

Grace Wong 1,
PMCID: PMC7133336  PMID: 32287489

Abstract

This paper uses the 2003 Hong Kong Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic as a natural experiment to investigate how housing markets react to extreme events. A panel data set of large-scale housing complexes (estates) is used to exploit the cross-sectional variation in the spread of SARS to estimate the effect of the disease on real estate prices and sales. SARS risk is measured by: (1) the estate-level SARS infection rate, (2) news reports, and (3) government announcements of infections. The average price declines by 1–3 percent if an estate is directly affected by SARS, and by 1.6 percent for all estates as a result of the outbreak of the disease. A back-of-the-envelope calculation of the expected price fall under the rational asset-pricing model implies that the economic value of life consistent with the SARS-related price movement was less than $1 million. This low figure contrasts with the predictions of overreaction from psychological and behavioral economics theories. An analysis of transaction volume suggests that the absence of price overreaction is likely to be related to housing market characteristics, including transaction costs, credit constraints and loss aversion.

Keywords: SARS, Housing prices, Overreaction, Shocks, Epidemics

Footnotes

This is an update of the first chapter of my PhD thesis at Princeton University.

References

  • 1.W. Burns, P. Slovic, R.E. Kasperson, J. Kasperson, O. Renn, S. Emani, Social amplification of risk: An empirical study, Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects Nuclear Waste Project Office, Carson City, NV
  • 2.Case K.E., Shiller R.J. The efficiency of the market for single-family houses. American Economic Journal. 1989;79:125–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cho M. House price dynamics: A survey of theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Housing Research. 1996;7:145–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.D. Genesove, C.J. Mayer, Loss aversion and seller behaviour: Evidence from the housing market, Working paper 8143, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001
  • 5.E. Glaeser, Psychology and the market, Working paper 10203, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003
  • 6.Holtgrave D., Weber E.U. Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Analysis. 1993;13:553–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kahneman D., Tversky A. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992;5:297–323. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krainer J. Real estate liquidity. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review. 1999 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.J.T. Liu, J.K. Hammitt, J.D. Wang, M.W. Tsou, Valuation of the risk of SARS in Taiwan, Working paper 10011, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003
  • 11.Morris S., Shin H.S. Social value of public information. American Economic Review. 2002;92:1521–1534. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Poterba J.M. Tax subsidies to owner-occupied housing: An asset-market approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1984;99:729–752. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roback J. Wages, rents and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy. 1982;90:1257–1278. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skantz T.R., Strickland T.H. House prices and a flood event: An empirical investigation of market efficiency. Journal of Real Estate Research. 1987;2:75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987;236:280–285. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stein J.C. Prices and trading volume in the housing market: A model with down-payment effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995;110:379–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Viscusi K. Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1989;2:235–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Viscusi K. Sources of inconsistency in societal responses. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 1990;80:257–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Viscusi K. The value of risks to life and health. Journal of Economic Literature. 1993;31:1912–1946. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wheaton W.C. Vacancy, search, and prices in a housing market matching model. Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98:1270–1292. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.G. Wong, Is SARS a poor man's disease? Housing values, living conditions and health status, Mimeo, The Wharton School, 2004

Articles from Journal of Urban Economics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES