Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2007 Feb 16;65:S1–S59. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60002-4

epic2: National Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections in NHS Hospitals in England

RJ Pratt a,*, CM Pellowe a, JA Wilson a,b, HP Loveday a, PJ Harper a, SRLJ Jones a, C McDougall b, MH Wilcox c
PMCID: PMC7134414  PMID: 17307562

Executive Summary

National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England were commissioned by the Department of Health (DH) and developed during 1998-2000 by a nurse-led multi-professional team of researchers and specialist clinicians. Following extensive consultation, they were published in January 2001.1 These guidelines describe the precautions healthcare workers should take in three areas: standard principles for preventing HCAI, which include hospital environmental hygiene, hand hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment, and the safe use and disposal of sharps; preventing infections associated with the use of short-term indwelling urethral catheters; and preventing infections associated with central venous catheters.

The evidence for these guidelines was identified by multiple systematic reviews of experimental and non-experimental research and expert opinion as reflected in systematically identified professional, national and international guidelines, which were formally assessed by a validated appraisal process. In 2003, we developed complementary national guidelines for preventing HCAI in primary and community care on behalf of the National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and Supportive Care (National Institute for Healthand Clinical Excellence).2

A cardinal feature of evidence-based guidelines is that they are subject to timely review in order that new research evidence and technological advances can be identified, appraised and, if shown to be effective in preventing HCAI, incorporated into amended guidelines. Periodically updating the evidence base and guideline recommendations is essential in order to maintain their validity and authority. Consequently, the DH commissioned a review of new evidence published following the last systematic reviews. We have now updated the evidence base for making infection prevention and control recommendations. A critical assessment of the updated evidence indicated that the original epic guidelines published in 2001 remain robust, relevant and appropriate but that adjustments need to be made to some guideline recommendations following a synopsis of the evidence underpinning the guidelines.

These updated national guidelines (epic2) provide comprehensive recommendations for preventing HCAI in hospitals and other acute care settings based on the best currently available evidence. Because this is not always the best possible evidence, we have included a suggested agenda for further research in each section of the guidelines. National evidence-based guidelines are broad principles of best practice which need to be integrated into local practice guidelines. To monitor implementation, we have suggested key audit criteria for each section of recommendations.

Clinically effective infection prevention and control practice is an essential feature of protecting patients. By incorporating these guidelines into routine daily clinical practice, patient safety can be enhanced and the risk of patients acquiring an infection during episodes of healthcare in NHS hospitals in England can be minimised.

Footnotes

Submitted 23 November 2006 Available online 5 February 2007

References

  • 1.Pratt RJ, Pellowe C, Loveday HP, Robinson N, Smith GW, the epic guideline development team, Barrett S, Davey P, Harper P, Loveday C, McDougall C, Mulhall A, Privett S, Smales C, Taylor L, Weller B, Wilcox M. The epic Project: Developing National Evidence-based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare associated Infections. Phase 1: Guidelines for Preventing Hospital-acquired Infections. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;47(Supplement):S1–S82. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pellowe CM, Pratt RJ, Harper P, Loveday HP, Robinson N, Jones S, MacRae ED, the Guideline Development Group, Mulhall A, Smith G, Bray J, Carroll A, Chieveley Williams S, Colpman D, Cooper L, McInnes E, McQuarrie I, Newey JA, Peters J, Pratelli N, Richardson G, Shah PJR, Silk D, Wheatley C. Infection Control: Prevention of healthcare-associated infection in primary and community care. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;55(Supplement 2):1–127. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00291-3. and British Journal of Infection Control 2003;4 (Supplement): 1-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pellowe CM, Pratt RJ, Loveday HP, Harper P, Robinson N, Jones SRLJ. The epic project. Updating the evidence-base for national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England: a report with recommendations. British Journal of Infection Control. 2004;5:10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pellowe CM, Pratt RJ, Loveday HP, Harper P, Robinson N, Jones SRLJ. The epic project. Updating the evidence-base for national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England: a report with recommendations [letter] Journal of Hospital Infection. 2005;59:373–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . CDC Guidelines: Improving the Quality. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The Agree Collaboration Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. http://www.agreecollaboration.org St Georges Hospital Medical School; June 2001.
  • 7.SIGN A guideline developers' handbook (SIGN 50). Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. 2001. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html (last updated May 2004)
  • 8.NICE Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. www.nice.org.uk National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence February 2004 (updated 2005)
  • 9.Harbour R, Miller JA. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. British Medical Journal. 2001;323:334–336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dancer SJ. Mopping up hospital infection. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1999;43:85–100. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garner JS, Favero MS. CDC Guideline for Handwashing and Hospital Environmental Control, 1985. Infection Control. 1986;7:231–235. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700084022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Working Party for Standards for Environmental Cleanliness in Hospitals. Standards for Environmental Cleanliness in Hospitals. Infection Control Nurses Association and the Association of Domestic Management; 1999.
  • 13.NHS Estates . Standards for environmental cleanliness in hospitals. The Stationery Office; London: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.NHS Estates . The NHS Healthcare Cleaning Manual. Department of Health; London: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Health and Safety Executive . Safe Disposal of Clinical Waste. HSE; London: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.National Health Service Executive . Hospital Laundry Arrangements for Used and Infected Linen. NHSE; Leeds: 1995. HSG (95)18. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.National Health Service Executive . Hospital Catering, Delivering a Quality Service. HMSO; London: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Expert Advisory group on AIDS and the Advisory group on Hepatitis . Guidance for clinical health care workers: Protection against infection with bloodborne viruses. Department of Health; London: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Microbiology Advisory Committee . Decontamination of equipment, linen or other surfaces contaminated with Hepatitis B and/or human immunodeficiency viruses. Department of Health; London: 1991. HC(91) 33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Health Service Executive . A First Class Service: Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health; Leeds: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Department of Health . The Health Act 2006: Code of Practice for the Prevention and Control of Health Care Associated Infections. Department of Health; London: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Griffiths R, Fernandez R, Halcomb E. Reservoirs of MRSA in the acute hospital setting: A systematic review. Contemporary Nurse. 2002;13:38–49. doi: 10.5172/conu.13.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Barker J, Vipond IB, Bloomfield SF. Effects of cleaning and disinfection in reducing the spread of Norovirus contamination via environmental surfaces. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2004;58:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Denton M, Wilcox MH, Parnell P, Green D, Keer V, Hawkey PM, Evans I, Murphy P. Role of environmental cleaning in controlling an outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii on a neurosurgical unit. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2004;56:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Wigglesworth N, Parnell P, Verity P, Freeman J. Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;54:109–114. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(02)00400-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.French GL, Otter JA, Shannon KP, Adams NMT, Watling D, Parks MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2004;57:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Chenevert C, King T. Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: possible infection control implications. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1997;18:622–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oie S, Hosokawa I, Kamiya A. Contamination of room door handles by methicillin - sensitive/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2002;51:140–143. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schultz M, Gill J, Zubairi S, Huber R, Gordin F. Bacterial contamination of computer keyboards in a teaching hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:302–303. doi: 10.1086/502200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Griffith CJ, Cooper RA, Gilmore J, Davies C, Lewis M. An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2000;45:19–28. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brooks SE, Walczak MA, Hameed R. Chlorhexidine resistance in antibiotic resistant bacteria isolated from the surfaces of dispensers of soap containing chlorhexidine. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2002;23:692–695. doi: 10.1086/501996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rampling A, Wiseman S, Davis L, Hyett AP, Walbridge AN, Payne GC, Cornaby AJ. Evidence that hospital hygiene is important in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;49:109–116. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dettenkofer M, Wenzler S, Amthor S, Antes G, Motschall E, Daschner FD. Does disinfection of environmental surfaces influence nosocomial infection rates? A systematic review. American Journal of Infection Control. 2004;32:84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Malik RE, Cooper RA, Griffith CJ. Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:181–187. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Microbiological Advisory Committee to the Department of Health . Sterilisation, disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment. Department of Health; London: 2006. ISBN 1-85-839518-6. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Available free of charge at: http://www.infectioncontrol.nhs.uk
  • 37.Gupta A, Della-Latta P, Todd B, San Gabriel P, Haas J, Wu F, Rubenstien D, Saiman L. Outbreak of extended beta lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal intensive care unit linked to artificial nails. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004;25:210–215. doi: 10.1086/502380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pittet D, Dharan S, Touveneau S, Sauvan V, Perneger T. Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1999;159:821–826. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.8.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pessoa-Silva CL, Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Touveneau S, Posfay-Barbe K, Pfister R, Pittet D. Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004;25:187–188. doi: 10.1086/502376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fendler EJ, Ali Y, Hammond BS, Lyons MK, Kelley MB, Vowell NA. The impact of alcohol hand sanitizer use on infection rates in an extended care facility. American Journal of Infection Control. 2002;30:226–233. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.120129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ryan MAK, Christian RS, Wohlrabe J. Handwashing and respiratory illness among young adults in military training. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2001;21:79–83. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00323-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S. Effectiveness of a hospital wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet. 2000;356:1307–1312. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02814-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gordin FM, Schulz ME, Huber RA, Gill JA. Reduction in nosocomial transmission of drug resistant bacteria after introduction of an alcohol-based hand rub. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26:650–653. doi: 10.1086/502596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2002;51(No. RR-16):1–45. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5116.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lucet J-C, Rigaud M-P, Mentre F, Kassis N, Deblangy C, Andremont A, Bouvet E. Hand contamination before and after different hand hygiene techniques: a randomised clinical trial. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2002;50:276–280. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Winnefeld M, Richard MA, Drancourt M, Grob JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. British Journal of Dermatology. 2000;143:546–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2000.03708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Larson E, Aiello AE, Bastyr J, Lyle C, Stahl J, Cronquist A. Assessment of two hand hygiene regimens for intensive care unit personnel. Critical Care Medicine. 2001;29:944–951. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Girou E, Loyeau S, Legrand P, Oppein F, Brun-Buisson C. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial. British Medical Journal. 2002;325:362–365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zaragoza M, Salles M, Gomez J, Bayas JM, Trilla A. Hand-washing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999;27:258–261. doi: 10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a97622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Larson EL, Cimiotti J, Haas J, Parides M, Nesin M, Della-Latta P, Saiman L. Effect of antiseptic handwashing vs alcohol sanitizer on health care-associated infections in neonatal intensive care units. Archives of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2005;159:377–383. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Herruzo-Cabrera R, Garcia-Caballero J, Martin-Moreno JM, Graciani-Perez-Regadera MA, Perez-Rodriguez J. Clinical assay of N-duopropenide alcohol solution on hand application in newborn and pediatric intensive care units: Control of an outbreak of multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a newborn intensive care unit with this measure. American Journal of Infection Control. 2001;29:162–167. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.115582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Herruzo-Cabrera R, Garcia-Caballero J, Fernandez-Acenero MJ. A new alcohol solution (N-duopropenide) for hygienic (or routine) hand disinfection is more useful than classic handwashing: in vitro and in vivo studies in burn and other intensive care units. Burns. 2001;27:747–752. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Larson E, Silberger M, Jakob K, Whittier S, Lai L, Latta PD. Assessment of alternative hand hygiene regimens to improve skin health among neonatal intensive care unit nurses. Heart and Lung. 2000;29:136–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D. Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002;359:1489–1490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08426-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moadab A, Rupley KF, Wadhams P. Effectiveness of a non-rinse alcohol-free antiseptic hand wash. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2001;91:288–293. doi: 10.7547/87507315-91-6-288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Guilhermetti M, Hernandes SED, Fukushigue Y, Garcia LB, Cardoso CL. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiolgy. 2001;22:105–108. doi: 10.1086/501872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Paulson DS, Fendler EJ, Dolan MJ, Williams RA. A close look at alcohol gel as an antimicrobial sanitizing agent. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999;27:332–338. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70053-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cardoso CL, Pereira HH, Zequim JC, Guilhermetti M. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999;27:327–331. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kampf G, Jarosch R, Ruden H. Limited effectiveness of chlorhexidine based hand disinfectants against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Journal of Hospital Infection. 1998;38:297–303. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dyer DL, Gerenraich KB, Wadhams PS. Testing a new alcohol-free hand santitizer to combat infection. AORN Journal. 1998;68:239–251. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D. Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:160–164. doi: 10.1086/502182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sickbert-Bennett EE, Weber DJ, Gergen-Teague MF, Sobsey MD, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses. American Journal of Infection Control. 2005;33:67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Faoagali JL, George N, Fong J, Davy J, Dowser M. Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate and 1% triclosan handwash products in an acute clinical ward. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999;27:320–326. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Storr J, Bowler I. Hand Hygiene Project. Unpublished document. Acknowledgement, Julie Storr, National Patient Safety Agency. July 2002.
  • 65.Trick WE, Vernon MO, Hayes RA. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;36:1383–1390. doi: 10.1086/374852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gustafson DR, Vetter EA, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM, Maker MD, Thompson RL. Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: A randomised trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2000;75:705–708. doi: 10.4065/75.7.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yamaoto Y, Kazuhiro U, Takahashi Y. Efficiency of hand drying for removing bacteria from washed hands: comparison of paper towel drying with warm air drying. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26:316–320. doi: 10.1086/502546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Boyce JM, Kelliher S, Vallande N. Skin irritation and dryness associated with two hand-hygiene regimens: Soap-and-water hand washing versus hand antisepsis with an alcoholic hand gel. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2000;21:442–448. doi: 10.1086/501785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Forrester BG, Roth VS. Hand dermatitis in intensive care units. Journal of Environmental Medicine. 1998;40:881–885. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199810000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kampf G, Muscatiello M. Dermal tolerance of sterillium, a propanol-based hand rub. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;55:295–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pietsch H. Hand antiseptics: rubs versus scrubs, alcohol solutions versus alcoholic gels. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;48(Supplement A):S33–S36. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(01)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Naikoba S, Hayward A. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers - a systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;47:173–180. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hilburn J, Hammond BS, Fendler EJ, Groziak PA. Use of alcohol hand sanitizer as an infection control strategy in an acute care facility. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:109–116. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rosenthal VD, Guzman S, Safdar N. Reduction in nosocomial infection with improved hand hygiene in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Argentina. American Journal of Infection Control. 2005;33:392–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rosenthal VD, McCormick RD, Guzman S, Villamayor C, Orellano PW. Effect of education and performance feedback on handwashing: the benefit of administrative support in Argentinean hospitals. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:85–92. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Won SP, Chou HC, Hsieh WS, Chen CY, Huang SM, Tsou KI, Tsao PN. Handwashing programme for the prevention of nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004;25:742–746. doi: 10.1086/502470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Macdonald A, Dinah F, Mackenzie D, Wilson A. Performance feedback of hand hygiene, using alcohol hand gel as the skin decontaminant, reduces the number of inpatients newly affected by MRSA and antibiotic costs. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2004;56:56–63. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wendt C, Knautz D, Baum H. Differences in hand hygiene behaviour related to the contamination risk of healthcare activities in different groups of healthcare workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004;25:203–206. doi: 10.1086/502378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cohen B, Saiman L, Cimmiotti J, Larson E. Factors associated with hand hygiene practices in two neonatal intensive care units. The Paediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2003;22:494–498. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000069766.86901.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Brown SM, Lubimova AV, Khrustalyeva NM, Shulaeva SV, Tekhova I, Zueva LP, Goldmann D, O'Rourke EJ. Use of an alcohol-based hand rub and quality improvement interventions to improve hand hygiene in a Russian neonatal intensive care unit. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:172–179. doi: 10.1086/502186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kuzu N, Ozer F, Aydemir S. Compliance with hand hygiene and glove use in a university-affiliated hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26:312–315. doi: 10.1086/502545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kim PW, Roghmann M, Perencevich EN. Rates of hand disinfection associated with glove use, patient isolation, and changes between exposure to various body sites. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:97–103. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.McGuckin M, Taylor A, Martin V, Porten L, Salcido R. Evaluation of a patient education model for increasing hand hygiene compliance in an inpatient rehabilitation unit. American Journal of Infection Control. 2004;32:235–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.McGuckin M, Waterman R, Storr J, Bowler ICJ, Ashby M, Topley K, Porten L. Evaluation of a patient-empowering hand hygiene programme in the UK. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;48:222–227. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.0983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Clark L, Smith W, Young L. Protective Clothing; Principles and Guidance. Infection Control Nurses Association; London: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Health and Safety Executive . Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations. HSE Books; London: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Health and Safety Executive . Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations: Guidance on Regulations. HSE Books; London: 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Health and Safety Commission . Approved Codes of Practice. HSE Books; London: 2002. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sax H, Perneger T, Hugonnet S, Herrault P, Chraiti M, Pittet D. Knowledge of standard and isolation precautions in a large teaching hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26:298–304. doi: 10.1086/502543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Trim JC, Adams D, Elliot TSJ. Healthcare workers' knowledge of inoculation injuries and glove use. British Journal of Nursing. 2003;12:215–221. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.4.11161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ferguson KJ, Waitzkin H, Beekmann SE, Doebbeling BN. Critical incidents of nonadherence with standard precautions guidelines among community hospital-based health care workers. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2004;19:726–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20424.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.British Standards Institution . Medical Gloves for Single Use Part 1: Specification for freedom from holes. BSI; London: 2000. BS-EN 455-1. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.British Standards Institution . Medical Gloves for Single Use Part 2: Specification for freedom from holes. BSI; London: 2000. BS-EN 455-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.British Standards Institution . Medical Gloves for Single Use Part 3: Requirements and testing for biological evaluation. BSI; London: 2000. BS-EN 455-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tenorio AR, Badri SM, Sahgal NB, Hota B, Matushek M, Hayden MK, Trenholme GM, Weinstein RA. Effectiveness of gloves in the prevention of hand carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus species by health care workers after patient care. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001;32:826–829. doi: 10.1086/319214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Korniewicz DM, El-Masri M, Broyles JM. To determine the effects of gloves stress, type of material (vinyl, nitrile, copolymer, latex) and manufacturer on the barrier effectiveness of medical examination gloves. American Journal of Infection Control. 2002;30:133–138. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.119512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Callaghan I. Bacterial contamination of nurses' uniforms: a study. Nursing Standard. 1998;13:37–42. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.09.13.1.37.c2525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Perry C, Marshall R, Jones E. Bacterial contamination of uniforms. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;48:238–241. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.0962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Huntley DE, Campbell J. Bacterial contamination of scrub jackets during dental hygiene procedures. Journal of Dental Hygiene. 1998;72:19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zachary KC, Bayne PS, Morrison VJ, Ford DS, Silver LC, Hooper DC. Contamination of gowns, gloves, and stethoscopes with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2001;22:560–564. doi: 10.1086/501952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Webster J, Pritchard MA. Gowning by attendants and visitors in newborn nurseries for prevention of neonatal morbidity and mortality (Review) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;2:1–23. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Puzniak LA, Leet T, Mayfield J, Kollef M, Mundy LM. To gown or not to gown: The effect on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002;35:18–25. doi: 10.1086/340739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Srinivasan A, Song X, Ross T, Merz W, Brower R, Perl TM. A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2002;23:424–428. doi: 10.1086/502079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Garner JS. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1996;17:53–80. doi: 10.1086/647190. and American Journal of Infection Control 1996;24:24-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Tuberculosis: Clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. Royal College of Physicians; London: 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.The Interdepartmental Working Group on Tuberculosis . The Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: UK Guidance on the prevention and control of transmission of 1. HIV-related tuberculosis 2. Drug-resistant, including multiple drug-resistant, tuberculosis. Department of Health; London: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Health and Safety Commission. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1999. Approved Codes of Practice. HSE Books; 1999.
  • 108.Seto WH, Tsang D, Yung RWH, Ching TY, Ng TK, Ho M. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Lancet. 2003;361:1519–1520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13168-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chia SE, Koh, Fones C. Appropriate use of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in public sector hospitals and primary healthcare polyclinics during the SARS outbreak in Singapore. Occupational Environmental Medicine. 2004;62:473–477. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Health Services Advisory Committee . Safe Disposal of Clinical Waste. Health and Safety Executive; Sheffield: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.National Audit Office . A Safer Place to Work: improving the Management of Health and Safety Risks to Staff in NHS Trusts. The Stationery Office; London: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Watterson L. Monitoring sharps injuries: EPINet(tm) surveillance results. Nursing Standard. 2004;19:33–38. doi: 10.7748/ns2004.09.19.3.33.c3701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Health Protection Agency . Eye of the Needle: United Kingdom Surveillance of Significant Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Viruses in Healthcare Workers. Health Protection Agency; London: November 2006. http://www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az/bbv/s_report.htm Centre for Infections. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Center for Disease Control and Prevention Workbook for Designing, Implementing and Evaluating a Sharps Injury Prevention Program. 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/sharpssafety/workbook.html
  • 115.Ward V, Wilson J, Taylor L, Cookson B, Glynn A. Preventing Hospital-acquired Infection: Clinical Guidelines. Public Health Laboratory Service; London: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Centers for Disease Control Universal Precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus and other blood borne pathogens in health care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1988;37:24. Update. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Occupational Safety and Health Administration Enforcement procedures for the occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Directive number CPL2-2.4D. 1999 [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Expert Advisory Group on AIDS . HIV Post-exposure Prophylaxis. Department of Health; London: 2000. http://www.infectioncontrol.nhs.uk [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Department of Health . An organisation with a memory. Stationery Office; London: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.NHS Employees . The Management of Health Safety and Welfare: Issues for NHS staff. Stationery Office; London: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sharps safety and needlestick prevention. 2nd edition. ECRI; Plymouth: 2003. [ http://www.ecri.org]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Asai T, Hidaka I, Kawashima A, Miki T, Inada K, Kawachi S. Efficacy of catheter needles with safeguard mechanisms. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:572–577. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Sohn S, Eagan J, Sepkowitz KA, Zuccotti G. Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004;25:536–542. doi: 10.1086/502436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Alvarado-Ramy F, Beltrami EM, Short LJ, Srivastava PU, Henry K, Mendleson M, Gerberding JL, Delclos GL, Campbell S, Solomon R, Fahrner R, Culver DH, Bell D, Cardo DM, Chamberland ME. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: Results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:97–104. doi: 10.1086/502179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rogues AM, Verdun-Esquer C, Buisson-Valles I, Laville MF, Lasheras A, Sarrat A, Beaudelle H, Brochard P, Gachie JP. Impact of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries related to phlebotomy procedures in health care workers. American Journal of Infection Control. 2004;32:441–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Mendelson MH, Lin-Chen BY, Solomon R, Bailey E, Kogan G, Goldbold J. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:105–112. doi: 10.1086/502174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Adams D, Elliott TSJ. A comparative user evaluation of three needle-protective devices. British Journal of Nursing. 2003;12:470–474. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.8.11273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cullen BL, Genasi F, Symington I, Bagg J, McCreadie M, Taylor A, Henry M, Hutchinson SJ, Goldberg D. Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety devices usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2006;63:445–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Centers for Disease Control Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health care workers during phlebotomy procedures - Minneapolis-St Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993-1995. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1997;46:21–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health . Preventing Needlestick Injuries in Health Care Settings. DHHS (NIOSH); Cincinnati: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency Sharps and needlestick interactive website 2006. http://www.pasa.doh.gov.uk
  • 132.Department of Health . Report from the Chief Medical Officer. Department of Health; London: 2002. Winning Ways: Working together to reduce Healthcare Associated Infection in England. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Baird DR, Henry M, Liddell KG, Mitchell CM, Sneddon JG. Post-operative endophthalmitis: the application of hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) to an infection control problem. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;49:14–22. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Wong ES, Hooton TM. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. American Journal of Infection Control. 1983;11:28–36. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(83)80012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Dieckhaus KD, Garibaldi RA. Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. In: Abrutytn E, Goldmann DA, Scheckler WE, editors. Saunders Infection Control Reference Service. W.B. Saunders Co.; Philadelphia: 1998. pp. 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kunin CM. Urinary Tract Infections: Detection, Prevention, and Management. 5th ed. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore MD: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Stamm WE. Urinary Tract Infections. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS, editors. Hospital Infection. 4th ed. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1998. pp. 477–485. [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Britt MR, Miller WA, Smith CB. Meatal colonisation and catheter associated bacteriuria. New England Journal of Medicine. 1980;303:316–318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198008073030605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Garibaldi RA, Mooney BR, Epstein BJ, Britt MR. An evaluation of daily bacteriologic monitoring to identify preventable episodes of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infection Control. 1982;3:466. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700056599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing Catheter-Related Bacteriuria: Should We? Can We? How? Archive of Internal Medicine. 1999;159:800–808. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.8.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Dougherty L, Lister S, editors. The Royal Marsden Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. 6th ed. Blackwell Publishing; Oxford: 2004. p. 339. [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cornia PB, Amory JK, Shelagh F, Saint S, Lipsky BA. Computer-based order entry decreases duration of indwelling urinary catheterisation in hospitalised patients. American Journal of Medicine. 2003;114:404–407. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01568-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Lopez-Lopez G, Pascual A, Martinez-Martinez L, Perea EJ. Effect of a siliconized latex urinary catheter on bacterial adherence and human neutrophil activity. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 1991;14:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90078-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Nickel JC, Feero P, Costerton JW, Wilson E. Incidence and importance of bacteriuria in postoperative short-term urinary catheterisation. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 1989;32:131–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Talja M, Korpela A, Jarvi K. Comparison of urethral reaction to full silicone, hydrogen-coated and siliconised latex catheters. British Journal of Urology. 1990;66:652–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb07203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Riley DK, Classen DC, Stevens LE, Burke JP. A large randomised clinical trial of a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: lack of efficacy and staphylococcal super-infection. American Journal of Medicine. 1995;98:349–356. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80313-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Johnson JR, Roberts PL, Olsen RJ, Moyer KA, Stamm WE. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection with a silver oxide-coated urinary catheter: clinical and microbiologic correlates. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1990;162:1145–1150. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.5.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liedberg H, Lundeberg T, Ekman P. Refinements in the coating of urethral catheters reduces the incidence of catheter-associated bacteriuria. An experimental and clinical study. European Urology. 1990;17:236–240. doi: 10.1159/000464046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Liedberg H, Lundeberg T. Silver alloy coated catheters reduce catheter-associated bacteriuria. British Journal of Urology. 1990;65:379–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Saint S, Elmore JG, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS, Koepsell TD. The efficacy of sliver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Medicine. 1998;105:236–241. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00240-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Brosnahan J, Jull A, Tracy C. The Cochrane Library (Issue 1) John Wiley and Sons; Chichester: 2004. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults. (Cochrane Review) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, Wilt TJ. Systematic Review: Antimicrobial Urinary Catheters To Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Hospitalized Patients. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144:116–126. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-2-200601170-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Dunn S, Pretty L, Reid H, Evans D. A Systematic Review. The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery; Australia: 2000. Management of short term indwelling urethral catheters to prevent urinary tract infections. [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Niel-Weise BS, Arend SM, van den Broek PJ. Is there evidence for recommending silver-coated urinary catheters in guidelines? Journal of Hospital Infection. 2002;52:81–87. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Verleyen P, De Ridder D, Van Poppel H, Baert L. Clinical application of the Bardex IC Foley Catheter. European Urology. 1998;36:240–246. doi: 10.1159/000068005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Karchmer TB, Giannetta ET, Muto CA, Strain BA, Farr BM. A Randomized Crossover Study of Silver-Coated Urinary Catheters in Hospitalized Patients. Archives Internal Medicine. 2000;160:3294–3298. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Saint S, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD, Chenoweth C, Fendrick M. The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection. Archives Internal Medicine. 2000;160:2670–2675. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Newton T, Still JM, Law E. A comparison of the effect of early insertion of standard latex and silver impregnated latex Foley catheters on urinary tract infections in burn patients. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2002;23:217–218. doi: 10.1086/502038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Gentry H, Cope S. Using silver to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nursing Standard. 2005;19:51–54. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.08.19.50.51.c3941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Madeo M, Davies D, Johnson G, Owen E, Wadsworth P, Martin CR. The impact of using silver alloy urinary catheters in reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections in the critical care setting. British Journal of Infection Control. 2004;5:21–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Marion N, Helget V, Puumala S, Anderson JR, Fey PD. Effect of silver-coated urinary catheters: efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and antimicrobial resistance. American Journal of Infection Control. 2004;32:445–450. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Chaiban G, Hanna H, Dvorak T, Raad I. A rapid method of impregnating endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters with gendine: a novel antiseptic agent. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2000;55:51–56. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Cho YW, Park JH, Kim SH, Cho YH, Choi JM, Shin HJ, Bae YH, Chung H, Jeong SY, Kwon IC. Gentamicin-releasing urethral catheter for short-term catheterization. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 2003;14:963–972. doi: 10.1163/156856203322381447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Thibon P, Le Coutour X, Leroyer R, Fabry J. Randomized multi-centre trial of the effects of a catheter coated with hydrogel and silver salts on the incidence of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2000;45:117–124. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Lai KK. Use of silver-hydrogel urinary catheters on the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. American Journal of Infection Control. 2002;30:221–225. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.120128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Gaonkar TA, Sampath LA, Modak SM. Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of urinary catheters impregnated with antiseptics in an in vitro urinary tract model. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2003;24:506–513. doi: 10.1086/502241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Darouche RO, Smith JA, Hanna H, Dhabuwala CB, Steiner MS, Babaian RJ, Boone TB, Scardino PT, Thornby JI, Raad II. Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated bladder catheters in reducing catheter-associated bacteriuria: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Urology. 1999;54:976–981. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00288-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Al-Habdan I, Sadat-Ali M, Corea JR, Al-Othman A, Kamal BA, Shriyan DS. Assessment of nosocomial urinary tract infections in orthopaedic patients: a prospective and comparative study using two different catheters. International Surgery. 2003;88(3):152–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Pomfret IJ. Continence clinic. Catheters: design, selection and management. British Journal of Nursing. 1996;5:245–251. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.4.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Roe BH, Brocklehurst JC. Study of patients with indwelling catheters. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1987;12:713–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Kass EH, Schneiderman LJ. Entry of bacteria into the urinary tract of patients with inlying catheters. New England Journal of Medicine. 1957;256:556–557. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195703212561206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Desautels RF, Walter CW, Graves RC, Harrison JH. Technical advances in the prevention of urinary tract infection. Journal of Urology. 1962;87:487–490. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64985-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Kunin CM, McCormack RC. Prevention of catheter-induced urinary tract infections by sterile closed drainage. New England Journal of Medicine. 1966;274:1155–1162. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196605262742101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterisation. New England Journal of Medicine. 1974;291:215–218. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197408012910501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Thornton GF, Andriole VT. Bacteriuria during indwelling catheter drainage: II. Effect of a closed sterile draining system. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1970;214:339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Gillespie WA, Simpson RA, Jones JE, Nashef L, Teasdale C, Speller DC. Does the addition of disinfectant to urine drainage bags prevent infection in catheterised patients? Lancet. 1983;1:1037–1039. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92657-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Gillespie WA, Lennon GG, Linton KB, Slade N. Prevention of urinary infections in gynaecology. British Medical Journal. 1964;2:423–425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5406.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Platt R, Murdock B, Polk BF, Rosner B. Reduction of mortality associated with nosocomial urinary tract infection. Lancet. 1983;1:893–897. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91327-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Keerasuntonpong A, Thearawiboon W, Panthawanan A., Judaeng T, Kachintorn K, Jintanotaitavorn D, Suddhisanont L, Waitayapiches S, Tiangrim S, Thamlikitkul V. Incidence of urinary tract infections in patients with short-term indwelling urethral catheters: a comparison between a 3-day urinary drainage bag change and no change regimens. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:9–12. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Maizels M, Shaeffer AJ. Decreased incidence of bacteriuria associated with periodic instillations of hydrogen peroxide into the urethral catheter drainage bag. Journal of Urology. 1980;123:841–845. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56156-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Sweet DE, Goodpasture HC, Holl K, Smart S, Alexander H, Hedari A. Evaluation of H2O2 prophylaxis of bacteriuria inpatients with long-term indwelling Foley catheters: a randomised controlled study. Infection Control. 1985;6:263–266. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700061725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Thompson RL, Haley CE, Searcy MA, Guenthner SM, Kaiser DL. Catheter-associated bacteriuria. Failure to reduce attack rates using periodic instillations of a disinfectant into urinary drainage systems. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1984;251:747–751. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.6.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Cleland V, Cox F, Berggren H, MacInnis MR. Prevention of bacteriuria in female patients with indwelling catheters. Nursing Research. 1971;20:309–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Burke JP, Garibaldi RA, Britt MR. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Efficacy of daily meatal care regimens. The American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:655–658. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90591-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Burke JP, Jacobson JA, Garibaldi RA, Conti MT, Alling DW. Evaluation of daily meatal care with poly-antibiotic ointment in the prevention of urinary catheter-associated bacteriuria. Journal of Urology. 1983;129:331–334. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52083-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Classen DC, Larsen RA, Burke JP, Stevens LE. Prevention of catheter-associated bacteriuria: clinical trial of methods to block three known pathways of infection. American Journal of Infection Control. 1991;19:136–142. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(91)90019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Classen DC, Larsen RA, Burke JP, Alling DW, Stevens LE. Daily meatal care for the prevention of catheter-associated bacteriuria: results using frequent applications of poly-antibiotic cream. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1991;12:157–162. doi: 10.1086/646309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Huth TS, Burke JP, Larsen RA, Classen DC, Stevens LE. Randomized trial of meatal care with silver sulfadiazine cream for the prevention of catheter-associated bacteriuria. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1992;165:14–18. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Webster J, Hood RH, Burridge CA, Doidge ML, Phillips KM, George N. Water or antiseptic for periurethral cleaning before urinary catheterization: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Infection Control. 2001;29:389–394. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.117447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Davies AJ, Desai HN, Turton S, Dyas A. Does instillation of chlorhexidine into the bladder of catheterized geriatric patients help reduce bacteriuria? Journal of Hospital Infection. 1987;9:72–75. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Ball AJ, Carr TW, Gillespie WA, Kelly M, Simpson RA, Smith PJ. Bladder irrigation with chlorhexidine for the prevention of urinary infection after transurethral operations: a prospective controlled study. Journal of Urology. 1987;138:491–494. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43237-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Jones MA, Hasan A. Controlled trial of intravesical noxythiolin in the prevention of infection following outflow tract surgery. British Journal of Urology. 1988;62:311–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Schneeberger PM, Vreede RW, Bogdanowicz JF, van Dijk WC. A randomised study on the effect of bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine before removal of an indwelling catheter. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1992;21:223–229. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90079-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Warren JW, Platt R, Thomas RJ, Rosner B, Kass EH. Antibiotic irrigation and catheter-associated urinary-tract infections. New England Journal of Medicine. 1978;299:570–573. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197809142991103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Muncie HLJ, Hoopes JM, Damron DJ, Tenney JH, Warren JW. Once-daily irrigation of long-term urethral catheters with normal saline. Lack of benefit. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1989;149:441–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Kennedy AP, Brocklehurst JC, Robinson JM, Faragher EB. Assessment of the use of bladder washouts/instillations in patients with long-term indwelling catheters. British Journal of Urology. 1992;70:610–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Cox F, Smith RF, Elliott JP, Quinn EL. Neomycin-polymyxin prophylaxis of urinary-tract infection associated with indwelling catheters. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1966;6:165–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Getliffe KA. The Use of Bladder Wash-Outs to Reduce Urinary Catheter Encrustation. British Journal of Urology. 1994;73:696–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Kennedy AP, Brocklehurst JC. Assessment of the Use of Bladder Washouts/Instillations in Patients with Long-term Indwelling Catheters. British Journal of Urology. 1992;70:610–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Getliffe KA, Hughes SC, Le Claire M. The dissolution of urinary catheter encrustation. British Journal of Urology International. 2000;85:60–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Emmerson AM, Enstone JE, Griffin M, Kelsey MC, Smyth ETM. The second national prevalence survey of infection in hospital - overview of results. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1996;32:175–190. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(96)90144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;271:1598–1601. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Plowman R, Graves N, Griffin MAS, Roberts JA, Swan AV, Cookson B, Taylor L. The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialities of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposed. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;47:198–209. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7:174–177. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Coello R, Charlett A, Ward V, Wilson J, Pearson A, Sedgwick J, Borriello P. Device-related sources of bacteraemia in English hospitals - opportunities for the prevention of hospital-acquired bacteraemia. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;53:46–57. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Fletcher SJ, Bodenham AR. Catheter-related sepsis: an overview -Part 1. British Journal of Intensive Care. 1999;9:46–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Farr B. Nosocomial Infections Related to Use of Intravascular Devices Inserted for Short-Term Vascular Access. In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 1999. p. 157. [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Pearson ML. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-device-related Infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1996;17:438–473. doi: 10.1086/647338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infections. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2002;51(No. RR-10):1–29. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5110.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Eggimann P, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Harbarth S, Chevrolet JC, Pittet D. Long-term Reduction of Vascular Access-Associated Bloodstream Infection. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005;42:875–876. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-10-200505170-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Warren DK, Zack JE, Mayfield JL, Chen A, Prentice D, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The effect of an education programme on the incidence of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU. CHEST November. 2004;126:1612–1618. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.East D, Jacoby K. The Effect of a nursing staff education program on compliance with central line care policy in the cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatric Nursing. 2005;31:182–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Lobo RD, Levin AS, Brasileiro Gomes LM, Cursino R, Park M, Figueiredo VB, Taniguchi L, Polido CG, Costa SF. Impact of an educational program and policy changes on decreasing catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a medical intensive care unit in Brazil. American Journal of Infection Control. 2005;33:83–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Rosenthal VD, Guzman S, Pezzotto SM, Crnich CJ. Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina. American Journal of Infection Control. 2003;31:405–409. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Tebbs SE, Sawyer A, Elliot TSJ. Influence of surface morphology on in vitro bacterial adherence to central venous catheters. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1994;72:587–591. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.5.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Pemberton LB, Lyman B, Lander V, Covinsky J. Sepsis from triple-vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients. Archives of Surgery. 1986;121:591–594. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400050109014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.McCarthy MC, Shives JK, Robison RJ, Broadie TA. Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1987;11:259–262. doi: 10.1177/0148607187011003259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Hilton E, Haslett TM, Borenstein MT, Tucci V, Isenberg HD, Singer C. Central catheter infections; single-versus triple-lumen catheters. Influence of guide wires on infection rates when used for replacement of catheters. American Journal of Medicine. 1988;84:667–672. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Yeung C, May J, Hughes R. Infection rate for single-lumen vs triple-lumen subclavian catheters. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1988;9:154–159. doi: 10.1086/645820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Clark-Christoff N, Watters VA, Sparks W, Snyder P, Grant JP. Use of triple-lumen subclavian catheters for administration of total parenteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1992;16:403–407. doi: 10.1177/0148607192016005403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Farkas JC, Liu N, Bleriot JP, Chevret S, Goldstein FW, Carlet J. Single-versus triple-lumen central catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomised study in a critically ill population. American Journal of Medicine. 1992;93:277–282. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90233-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Gil RT, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carolson RW. Triple-vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1989;149:1139–1143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Dezfulian C, Lavelle J, Nallamothu BK, Kaufman SR, Saint S. Rates of infection for single-lumen versus multilumen central venous catheters: A meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine. 2003;31:2385–2390. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000084843.31852.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Zürcher M, Tramèr M, Walder B. Colonization and Bloodstream Infection with Single-Versus Multi-Lumen Central Venous Catheters: A Quantitative Systematic Review. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2004;99:177–182. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000118101.94596.A0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Abraham JL, Mullen JL. A prospective study of prolonged central venous access in leukaemia. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1982;248:2868–2873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Shapiro ED, Wald ER, Nelson KA, Spiegelman KN. Broviac catheter-related bacteraemia in oncology patients. American Journal of Diseases in Children. 1982;136:679–681. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970440023006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Press OW, Ramsey PG, Larson EB, Fefer A, Hickman RO. Hickman catheter infections in patients with malignancies. Medicine. 1984;63:189–200. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198407000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Darbyshire PJ, Weightman NC, Speller DC. Problems associated with indwelling central venous catheters. Archives of Diseases in Childhood. 1985;60:129–134. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Pessa ME, Howard RJ. Complications of Hickman-Broviac catheters. Surgical Gynecology Obstetrics. 1985;161:257–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Schuman ES, Winters V, Gross GF, Hayes JF. Management of Hickman catheter sepsis. American Journal of Surgery. 1985;149:627–628. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Rannem T, Ladefoged K, Tvede M, Lorentzen JE, Jarnum S. Catheter-related septicemia in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Scandinavavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1986;21:455–460. doi: 10.3109/00365528609015162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Shulman RJ, Smith EO, Rahman S, Gardner P, Reed T, Mahoney D. Single-vs double-lumen central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients. American Journal of Diseases in Children. 1988;142:893–895. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150080099034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Weightman NC, Simpson EM, Speller DC, Mott MG, Oakhill A. Bactermia related to indwelling central venous catheters: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1988;7:125–129. doi: 10.1007/BF01963064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Raad I, Davis S, Becker M. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993;153:1791–1796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Andrivet P, Bacquer A, Ngoc CV. Lack of clinical benefit from subcutaneous tunnel insertion of central venous catheters in immunocompromised patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994;18:199–206. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Gyves J, Ensminger W, Niederhuber J. A totally-implanted injection port system for blood sampling and chemotherapy administration. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1984;251:2538–2541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Lokich JJ, Bothe AJ, Benotti P, Moore C. Complications and management of implanted venous access catheters. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1985;3:710–717. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.5.710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Khoury MD, Lloyd LR, Burrows J, Berg R, Yap J. A totally implanted venous access system for the delivery of chemotherapy. Cancer. 1985;56:1231–1234. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<1231::aid-cncr2820560546>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.McDowell HP, Hart CA, Martin J. Implantable subcutaneous venous catheters. Archives of Diseases in Childhood. 1986;61:1037–1038. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.10.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Brickner H, Saeter G. Fifty-five patient years' experience with a totally implanted system for intravenous chemotherapy. Cancer. 1986;57:1124–1129. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860315)57:6<1124::aid-cncr2820570611>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Wurzel CL, Halom K, Feldman JG, Rubin LG. Infection rates of Broviac-Hickman catheters and implantable venous devices. American Journal of Diseases in Children. 1988;142:536–540. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150050074036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Kappers-Klunne MC, Degener JE, Stijnen T, Abels J. Complications from long-term indwelling central venous catheters in hematologic malignancy patients with special reference to infection. Cancer. 1989;64:1747–1752. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1747::aid-cncr2820640832>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Carde P, Cosset-Delaigue MF, Laplanche A, Chareau I. Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus total implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration. A randomised trial in 100 patients with solid tumors. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology. 1989;25:939–944. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90151-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Pegues D, Axelrod P, McClarren C. Comparison of infections in Hickman and implanted port catheters in adult solid tumor patients. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1992;49:156–162. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930490306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.van der Pijl H, Frissen PH. Experience with a totally implantable venous access device (Port-A-Cath) in patients with AIDS. AIDS. 1992;6:709–713. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199207000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1993;119:1168–1174. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Timsit JF, Sebille V, Farkas JC, Misset B, Martin JB, Chevret S. Effects of subcutaneous tunneling on internal jugular catheter-related sepsis in critically ill patient: a prospective randomised multicenter study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;276:1416–1420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C, Mamzer MF, Garrouster-Orgeas M, Wolff M. Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: a randomised controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130:729–735. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-9-199905040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Randolph A, Cook D, Gonzales C, Brun-Buisson C. Tunneling short-term central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care Medicine. 1998;26:1452–1457. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127:257–266. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Logghe C, Van Ossel Ch, D'Hoore W, Ezzedine H, Wauters G, Haxhe JJ. Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1997;37:145–156. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Heard SO, Wagle M, Vijayakumar E, McLean S, Brueggemann A, Napolitano LM, Edwards LP, O'Connell FM, Puyana JC, Doern G. Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and sliver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998;158:81–87. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Haxhe JJ, D'Hoore W. A meta-analysis dealing with the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1998;40:166–168. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Oda T, Hamasaki J, Kanda N, Mikami K. Anaphylactic shock induced by an antiseptic-coated central venous catheter. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1242–1244. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199711000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Veenstra DL, Saint S, Sullivan S. Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282:554–560. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.6.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, Abi-Said D, Gabrielli A, Hachem R, Harris R, Jones J, Buzaid A, Robertson C, Shenaq S, Curling P, Burke T, Ericsson C, the Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127:267–274. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Colin GR. Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Chest. 1999;115:1632–1640. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Darouiche RO, Raad I, Heard S, Thornby JL, Wenker OC, Gabrielli A, Berg J, Khardori N, Hanna H, Henchem R, Harris R, Mayhall G. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:1–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Veenstra DL, Saint S, Saha S, Lumley T, Sullivan S. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;281:261–267. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.3.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000;132:391–402. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Walder B, Pittet D, Tramer M. Prevention of bloodstream infections with central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents depends on catheter type and insertion time: evidence from a meta-analysis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2002;23:748–756. doi: 10.1086/502005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Bassetti S, Hu J, D'Agostino RB, Jr, Sherertz RJ. Prolonged antimicrobial activity of a catheter containing chlor-hexidine/silver sulfadiazine extends protection against catheter infections in vivo. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45:1535–1538. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1535-1538.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Hockenhull JC, Dwan K, Boland A, Smith G, Bagust A, Dickson R, Dundar Y, Gambol C, McCleod C, Walley T. The clinical and cost effectiveness of central venous catheters treated with anti-microbial agents in preventing bloodstream infections: a systematic review and economic evaluation. http://www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk/ Health Technology Assessment 2006. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 264.Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. American Journal of Medicine. 1991;91(suppl 3B):S197–S205. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90369-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G. Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1990;28:2520–2525. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2520-2525.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Goetz AM, Wagener MM, Miller JM, Muder RR. Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1998;19:842–845. doi: 10.1086/647742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Trottier SJ, Veremakis C, O'Brien J, Auer AI. Femoral deep vein thrombosis associated with central venous catheterization: results from a prospective, randomized trial. Critical Care Medicine. 1995;23:52–59. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199501000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286:700–707. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.6.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Joynt GM, Kew J, Gomersall CD, Leung VY, Liu EK. Deep venous thrombosis caused by femoral venous catheters in critically ill adult patients. Chest. 2000;117:178–183. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.1.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Mian NZ, Bayly R, Schreck DM, Besserman EB, Richmand D. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis associated with femoral venous catheterization. Academic Emergency Medicine. 1997;4:1118–1121. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Durbec O, Viviand X, Potie F, Vialet R, Albanese J, Martin C. A prospective evaluation of the use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults. Critical Care Medicine. 1997;25:1986–1989. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199712000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Critical Care Medicine. 1996;24:2053–2058. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.National Institute for Clinical Excellence Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters (No. 49) September 2002. http://www.nice.org.uk
  • 274.Ryder MA. Peripheral access options. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 1995;4:395–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Noble WC. Skin microbiology: coming of age. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 1984;17:1–12. doi: 10.1099/00222615-17-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Safdar N, Maki DG. Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. Chest. 2005;128:489–495. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Maki DG. Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1994;15:227–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Bull DA, Neumayer LA, Hunter GC. Improved sterile technique diminishes the incidence of positive line cultures in cardiovascular patients. Journal of Surgical Research. 1992;52:106–110. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90287-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Raad I, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1994;15:231–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Maki DG, Mermel LA. Infections due to Infusion Therapy. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS, editors. Hospital Infections. 4th ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; Philadelphia: 1998. pp. 709–710. [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Raad I, Umphrey J. Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Evaluation of CDC Guidelines. In: Abrutyn EA, Goldman DA, Scheckler WE, editors. Saunders Infection Control Reference Services. WB Saunders Co.; Philadelphia: 1998. pp. 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Fletcher SJ, Bodenham AR. Catheter-related sepsis: an overview -Part 2. British Journal of Intensive Care. 1999;9:74–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Hu KK, Lipsky BA, Veenstra DL, Saint S. Using maximal sterile barriers to prevent central venous catheter-related infection: A systematic evidence-based review. American Journal of Infection Control. 2004;32:142–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Mimoz O, Pieroni L, Lawrence C, Edouard A, Costa Y, Samii K, Brun-Buisson C. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients. Critical Care Medicine. 1996;24:1818–1823. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet. 1991;338:339–343. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90479-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Mimoz O, Pieroni L, Lawrence C, Edouard A, Costa Y, Samii K, Brun-Buisson C. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients. Critical Care Medicine. 1996;24:1818–1823. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Larson E. Guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agents. American Journal of Infection Control. 1988;16:253–266. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(88)80005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Rannem T, Ladefoged K, Hegnhoj F, Hylander Moller E, Bruun B, Farnum S. Catheter-related sepsis in long-term parenteral nutrition with Broviac catheters. An evaluation of different disinfectants. Clinical Nutrition. 1990;9:131–136. doi: 10.1016/0261-5614(90)90044-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Prager RL, Silva J. Colonization of central venous catheters. Southern Medical Journal. 1984;77:458–461. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198404000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Moran JM, Atwood RP, Rowe MI. A clinical and bacteriologic study of infections associated with venous cutdowns. New England Journal of Medicine. 1965;272:554–560. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196503182721103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Norden CW. Application of antibiotic ointment to the site of venous catheterization: a controlled trial. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1969;120:611–615. doi: 10.1093/infdis/120.5.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Zinner SH, Denny-Brown BC, Braun P, Burke JP, Toala P, Kass EH. Risk of infection with indwelling intravenous catheters: effect of application of antibiotic ointment. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1969;120:616–619. doi: 10.1093/infdis/120.5.616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Jarrad MM, Freeman JB. The effects of antibiotic ointments and antiseptics on the skin flora beneath subclavian catheter dressings during intravenous hyperalimentation. Journal of Surgical Research. 1977;22:520–526. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(77)90035-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Maki DG, Band JD. A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointment in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:739–744. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90605-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: A meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 4 June. 2002;136:792–801. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Langgartner J, Linde HJ, Lehn N, Reng M, Schölmerich J, Gluck Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters. Intensive Care Medicine. 2004;30:1081–1088. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2282-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Parienti JJ, du Cheyron D, Ramakers M, Malbruny B, Leclercq R, Le Coutour X, Charbonneau P, Members of the NACRE Study Group Alcoholic povidone-iodine to prevent central venous catheter colonization: a randomized unit-crossover study. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32:708–713. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000115265.05604.7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Gillies D, O'Riordan L, Carr D, Frost J, Gunning R, O'Brien I. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters (Review) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;3:1–18. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Miller JJ, Venus B, Mathru M. Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterisation using single-lumen, triple-lumen, and pulmonary artery catheters. Critical Care Medicine. 1984;12:634–637. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198408000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Ullman RF, Gurevich I, Schoch PE, Cunha BA. Colonization and bacteremia related to duration of triple-lumen intravascular catheter placement. American Journal of Infection Control. 1990;18:201–207. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(90)90185-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary artery catheters. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;237:1062–1068. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Michel LA, Bradpiece HA, Randour P, Pouthier F. Safety of central venous catheter change over a guide wire for suspected catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomised trial. International Surgery. 1988;73:180–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Cook D, Randolph A, Kemerman P, Cupido C, King D, Soukup C, Brun-Buisson C. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: A systematic review of the literature. Critical Care Medicine. 1997;25:1417–1424. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG, Miller KB. Prospective study of catheter replacement and other risk factors for infection of hyperalimentation catheters. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1986;154:808–816. doi: 10.1093/infdis/154.5.808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Synder RH, Archer FJ, Endy T. Catheter infection. A comparison of two catheter maintenance techniques. Annals of Surgery. 1988;208:651–653. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Pettigrew RA, Lang SDR, Haydock DA, Parry BR, Bremner DA, Hill GL. Catheter-related sepsis in patients on intravenous nutrition: a prospective study of quantitative catheter cultures and guide wire changes for suspected sepsis. British Journal of Surgery. 1985;72:52–55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Newsome HH, Jr, Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG. Mechanical complications from insertion of subclavian venous feeding catheters: comparison of de novo percutaneous venipuncture to change of catheter over guide wire. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1984;8:560–562. doi: 10.1177/0148607184008005560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Farr BM. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of new tests for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Lancet. 1999;354:1487–1488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00258-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Siegman-Igra Y, Anglim AM, Shapiro D, Adal KA, Strain B, Farr MB. Diagnosis of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1997;35:928–936. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.928-936.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.deCicco M, Chiaradia V, Veronesi A. Source and route of microbial colonization of parenteral nutrition catheters. Lancet. 1982;2:1258–1261. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91861-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Capell S, Linares J, Sitges-Serra A. Catheter sepsis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients on total parenteral nutrition. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1986;5:40–42. doi: 10.1007/BF02013459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Salzman MB, Isenberg HD, Shapiro JF, Lipsitz PJ, Rubin LG. A prospective study of the catheter hub as the portal of entry for microorganisms causing catheter-related sepsis in neonates. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1993;167:487–490. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.2.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Peters G, Locci R, Pulverer G. Adherence and growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci on surfaces of intravenous catheters. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1982;146:479–482. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Linares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garau J, Perez JL, Martin R. Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1985;21:357–360. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.3.357-360.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Sitges-Serra A, Linares J, Perez JL, Jaurrieta E, Lorente L. A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1985;9:322–325. doi: 10.1177/0148607185009003322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Raad I, Costerton W, Sabharwal U, Sacilowski M, Anaissie E, Bodey GP. Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1993;168:400–407. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.2.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Weist K, Sperber A, Dietz E, Ruden H. Contamination of stopcocks mounted in administration sets for central venous catheters with replacement at 24 hrs versus 72 hrs: a prospective cohort study. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1997;18:24. [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Salzman MB, Isenberg HD, Rubin LG. Use of disinfectants to reduce microbial contamination of hubs of vascular catheters. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1993;31:475–479. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.475-479.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Rushman KL, Fulton JS. Effectiveness of disinfectant techniques on intravenous tubing latex injection ports. Journal of Intravenous Nursing. 1993;16:304–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Casey AL, Worthington T, Lambert PA, Quinn D, Faroqui MH, Elliott TSJ. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow(r) needleless connector. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;54:288–293. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00130-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Van de Wetering MD, van Woensel JBM. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing early central venous catheter Gram positive infections in oncology patients (Review) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;1:1–16. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Hoar PF, Wilson RM, Managano DT. Heparin bonding reduces thrombogenicity of pulmonary-artery catheters. New England Journal of Medicine. 1981;305:993–995. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110223051707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Raad II, Luna M, Kahlil SA, Costerton JW, Lam C, Bradley GP. The relationship between the thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;271:1014–1016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Chastre J., Comud F, Bouchama A. Thrombosis as a complication of pulmonary-artery catheterisation within the internal jugular vein. New England Journal of Medicine. 1982;306:278–281. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202043060506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Valerio D, Hussey JK, Smith FW. Central venous thrombosis associated with intravenous feeding: a prospective study. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1981;5:240–242. doi: 10.1177/0148607181005003240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Andrew M, Marzinotto V, Pencharz P. A cross-sectional study of catheter-related thrombosis in children receiving total parenteral nutrition at home. Journal of Pediatrics. 1995;126:358–363. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70448-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Krafte-Jacobs B, Sivit CJ, Mejia R. Catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children: comparison of catheters with and without heparin bonding. Journal of Pediatrics. 1995;126:50–54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70499-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Talbott GA, Winters WD, Bratton SL. A prospective study of femoral catheter-related thrombosis in children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 1995;149:288–289. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170150068012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Andrew M. Benefit of Heparin in Central Venous and Pulmonary Artery Catheters: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Chest January. 1998;113:165–171. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Mehta DK, editor. British National Formulary No. 51. British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; London: 2006. pp. 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, Bothe A, Jr, Benotti PN, Arkin CF. Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. A randomized prospective trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1990;112:423–428. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-76-3-112-6-423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Passannante A, Macik BG. Case report: the heparin flush syndrome: a cause of iatrogenic hemorrhage. American Journal of Medical Science July. 1998;296:71–73. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198807000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Andrew M. Benefit of heparin in peripheral venous and arterial catheters: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal. 1998;316:969–975. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Goode CJ, Titler M, Rakel B, Ones DS, Kleiber C, Small S. A meta-analysis of effects of heparin flush and saline flush: quality and cost implications. Nursing Research. 1991;40:324–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Peterson FY, Kirchoff KT. Analysis of the research about heparinized versus nonheparinized intravascular lines. Heart and Lung. 1991;20:631–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hospital Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES