The success of critical care medicine has historically been gauged by short-term mortality outcome. With technological advances, many patients now survive what were previously fatal critical illnesses, generating an expanding population of critical care survivors. Many survivors suffer with new or worsening impairments in physical, cognitive or mental health status arising after a critical illness and persisting beyond acute care hospitalization which has been termed Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) [1]. This term can be applied to a survivor or a family member who often experiences significant social & psychiatric burdens caring for a survivor of critical illness [1 2]. It is estimated that PICS develops in greater than 2.4 million Americans who survive critical illness each year, including approximately two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries who survive critical illness [3]. As a consequence of both an aging population and the dramatic improvement in mortality rates in those suffering from critical illness, PICS is rapidly becoming a major public health concern. For these survivors, new impairments after critical illness can have dramatic impacts on their quality of life or ability to be employed, and may persist for months or years after hospital discharge.
This review of the will examine emerging practices in relation to ICU after care for both patients and caregivers, with specific emphasis on the critical role of the nurse.
Approaches to ICU Aftercare
The role of the ICU aftercare program is to specifically address the physical, mental health, and cognitive impairments associated with PICS in order to improve the survivorship experience for patients and caregivers. The goal of ICU aftercare programs is to provide personalized care that focuses on the unique needs of ICU survivors, however, there is no one standard model of care in place currently. Peer support, post-ICU clinics, and ICU diary aftercare programs are currently being implemented and investigated internationally with modest results.
[4–6]. A description of each program and modes of delivery is provided in the next sections. These ICU aftercare programs can be implemented in isolation or in combination, depending on resources, to provide a more comprehensive recovery program.
Post-ICU Clinics and Recovery Programs
Post-ICU clinics and recovery programs have been established in many hospital systems internationally [4 7–9]. These clinics have taken a variety of forms in terms of professional input, and process. Wide variation exists in the staffing of post-ICU clinic recovery programs more generally, for example [10]. Some clinics are led by a single discipline (i.e., nurse or physician led) while others include members of the entire multidisciplinary team (MDT) [11]. More recently, single center data has described a model which utilizes staff from both health and social services, with the aim of supporting some of the socioeconomic problems, which patients and indeed their caregivers, face during the ICU recovery period [12]. On a small scale, this approach appears to be well received by patients, however, more work is required to understand the contextual differences across healthcare systems and how this type of support can be optimally implemented [12 13].
There has been debate in the literature regarding the type of expertise the team delivering post-ICU care should have [14]. Some commentators have stated that this care is best delivered by specialists in rehabilitation, while others believe that ICU providers should lead this care either in isolation or in partnership with rehabilitation specialists [15 16]. Recent data suggests that by having staff from the ICU involved in post-ICU care, outcomes and care delivery across the entire ICU pathway may be improved by understanding patient and caregiver experience more fully [17]. Single centre evidence also suggests that having the ICU staff involved in care over the entire recovery trajectory of the patient may help reduce staff burnout and increase joy in work [18].
The interventions delivered within clinics internationally also have variation around their format and process. Some clinics have patients attend as a stand-alone appointment, while some provide follow-up at pre-defined intervals (i.e. 3 months and 12 months). Other models have a similar approach to that of pulmonary rehabilitation in that they offered staggered, regular interventions, to promote goal setting and changing patient needs. This overall lack of a standardized approach and professional input is not necessarily reflective of need, but rather what is feasible within the remits of limited funding and evidence of effectiveness [17].
Peer Support Programs
Peer support during recovery from critical illness is designed for individuals who have experienced a stay in the ICU either as a patient or as the loved one of a patient. Through this approach to ICU aftercare, survivors and their families are provided an opportunity to facilitate their own recovery and improve their quality of life by relating to others with shared experiences [19]. Current models of peer support for ICU survivors and their families include group sessions that coincide with post-ICU outpatient clinic visits, information sessions led by a content expert, group sessions that are co-facilitated by ICU staff, peer-to-peer mentoring, and group sessions that are held for the loved ones of patients while the patient remains critically ill [10 20]. Peer support can also occur online through discussion boards that can be joined and referenced by ICU survivors and their families from around the world, and through teleconference options, which allow for real-time participation for those who live a long distance or are too debilitated to travel and attend the in-person peer support session. Common methods of recruitment for ICU survivor and family participants occur through the distribution of advertisements and brochures around the hospital and medical center, during follow-up phone calls or visits, and/or through direct mailings or emails.
ICU Diary Programs
As seen in the ever-expanding body of evidence related to the patient’s ICU experience, it has become clear that as a result of gaps in memory, such as during periods of sedation that occur with mechanical ventilation or during periods of delirium, many patients suffer from lingering stress after their time in the ICU, manifesting as long-lasting anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms [21–23]. In a few small clinical trials, ICU diary programs have been associated with reductions in the incidence of post-traumatic stress response in ICU survivors and their families [24–26], and are recommended in guidelines for family-centered care in the ICU [27]. Written by the patient’s loved ones and hospital care team members, the ICU diary may help the ICU survivor begin make sense of time they have forgotten, and provide a unique approach for reflection on their critical illness experience. Along with providing the patient information about what is happening, which equipment is making noise, and who is spending time with time, the entries provide messages of support, encouragement, and hope for recovery. ICU diary programs are unique to each healthcare system and may include photographs of the patient throughout their critical illness, so that progress can be visualized. The loved ones of a patient may feel empowered with a sense of purpose as they write daily entries in the ICU diary [27]. Loved ones help the staff understand who the patient is by filling out the pages that highlight the patient’s preferences. Patients are encouraged to write in their own ICU diary if and when they feel able.
ICU diaries are not always immediately read by the patient once they leave the ICU. Rather, after several weeks or months, the patient may feel ready to debrief their ICU stay. Debriefing occurs by reviewing the diary with a hospital care team member during a post-ICU clinic visit, discussing entries of importance during a peer support session, or by going through the diary with their loved ones independently from the hospital care team. Patients who do not remember any of their stay in the ICU use their diary to put names to faces during peer support sessions or during a planned visit to the unit when they feel ready for it.
The Role of the Nurse Leader in ICU Aftercare
Nurses are uniquely trained and positioned within the health care system to become leaders within ICU aftercare programs.
Clinician
As ICU survivor research continues to evolve, more evidence will be available to guide the development of ICU aftercare programs. Nurses will undoubtedly continue to play a significant role in translating these discoveries into action for our patients and family members who have experienced critical illness. Nurses, with the foundational training in patient-centered care, are uniquely qualified to lead initiatives in both the development and implementation of these programs. Currently, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) as well as RNs have roles in the creation, facilitation and education, leadership, and staffing of post-ICU clinics, peer support groups, and ICU diary programs. Existing peer support programs for ICU survivors are often utilizing nurses as the key facilitators [20]. In many instances in the US, the APRN leads the interprofessional team that designs and establishes a peer support program which works within the confines of the individual institution. Identification and recruitment of survivors for ICU aftercare programs can be performed by the APRN through follow-up phone calls and rounding on ICU survivors after their transition from the critical care unit. Many post-ICU clinics also utilize the APRN as one of the outpatient providers. Throughout the world, ICU diary programs are often initiated by nurses. Along with educations and supporting family members to write entries, nurses are also the most likely care team member outside of the patient’s loved ones to utilize the ICU diary. Debriefing the ICU stay with the patient and their ICU diary is also often performed by a nurse at the post-ICU clinic or at a peer support session. Evaluation and education of ICU aftercare programs is commonly managed by nurses, who solicits feedback from participants and works with the team to make adjusts to the programs as needed. The nurse also shares pertinent information with the staff nurses to improve care delivery at the bedside.
Advocate
To ensure that patients and families recovering from critical illness receive needed support during recovery, raising awareness of PICS is essential. Nurses can advocate for the ICU survivor and their family through educational initiatives that target colleagues as well as patients and family members. Additionally, assisting patients and their families in identifying ICU aftercare resources will support their recovery trajectory and overall well-being. Nurses can also advocate for the ICU survivor through the fostering of the multidisciplinary collaboration seen in ICU aftercare. A team approach to ICU survivor care provides an avenue to an interdisciplinary plan of care. Finally, empowering ICU survivors to play an active role in the creation of patient- centered goals allows patients to take control of their health care decision and actions affecting their recovery trajectory.
Researcher
Nurse scientists play a valuable role within healthcare delivery systems [28]. Research focused on ICU aftercare is necessary to evaluate effectiveness and outcomes and to establish evidenced- based recommendations which organizations can use to create new programs. Nurse scientists can effectively lead this research and contribute significantly to the science of recovery from critical illness. Examples of research, where nurses have delivered central roles include: Psychological Outcomes following a nurse-led Preventative Psychological Intervention for critically ill patients trial (POPPI) [29] and Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment program (InS:PIRE) [19].
Future Directions for ICU Aftercare
As the numbers of available ICU aftercare and recovery programs continue to expand, the demand for such programs is also likely to increase. Currently, many of the available programs are in large urban centers and are associated with large academic medical centers. Innovative aftercare delivery models are being explored to address these barriers such as the use of mobile ICU recovery programs [30] or the use of telemedicine services for ICU survivors.
An underdeveloped area in our understanding of post-ICU care delivery is the support needed by caregivers. Caregivers and close family members are known to experience similar social and emotional problems to patients in the year following critical illness [31]. However, it is not clear whether caregivers and family members have the same recovery trajectories. Spikes in emotional and mental health problems, for example, may appear at different stages. Future research and innovation must attempt to address the recovery arc of caregivers and how to best intervene to improve outcomes for this vulnerable group.
Conclusion
PICS morbidities contribute to ongoing challenges for survivors of critical illness and their family members. Post-ICU clinics, peer support, and ICU diary aftercare programs offer approaches to reinforce family-centered care in the ICU as well as enhance patient and family member experiences with recovery from critical illness. As demand for ICU aftercare programs increase, nurses will play an important role in the development, implementation, and sustainability as key members of the multidisciplinary ICU recovery team.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) THRIVE post-ICU clinic and peer support collaboratives and their contribution to the authors’ efforts to provide education regarding the comprehensive care for ICU survivors & their families.
Contributor Information
Tammy L. Eaton, UPMC Mercy, Critical Illness Recovery Center (CIRC), Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA.
Joanne McPeake, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Julie Rogan, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Annie Johnson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Leanne M. Boehm, School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; Critical Illness, Brain dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN.
References
- 1.Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med 2012;40(2):502–9 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med 2012;40(2):618–24 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Griffiths J, Hatch RA, Bishop J, et al. An exploration of social and economic outcome and associated health-related quality of life after critical illness in general intensive care unit survivors: a 12-month follow-up study. Crit Care 2013;17(3):R100 doi: 10.1186/cc12745 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schofield-Robinson OJ, Lewis SR, Smith AF, McPeake J, Alderson P. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;11:CD012701 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012701.pub2 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ullman AJ, Aitken LM, Rattray J, et al. Intensive care diaries to promote recovery for patients and families after critical illness: a Cochrane systematic review. International journal of nursing studies 2015;52(7):1243–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haines KJ, Beesley SJ, Hopkins RO, et al. Peer support in critical care: A systematic review. Critical care medicine 2018;46(9):1522–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bakhru RN, Davidson JF, Bookstaver RE, et al. Physical function impairment in survivors of critical illness in an ICU Recovery Clinic. J Crit Care 2018;45:163–69 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.001 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sevin CM, Bloom SL, Jackson JC, Wang L, Ely EW, Stollings JL. Comprehensive care of ICU survivors: Development and implementation of an ICU recovery center. J Crit Care 2018;46:141–48 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.011 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McPeake J, Iwashyna TJ, Devine H, MacTavish P, Quasim T. Peer support to improve recovery following critical care discharge: a case-based discussion. Thorax 2017;72(9):856–58 doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209661 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McPeake J, Hirshberg EL, Christie LM, et al. Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post- Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative. Crit Care Med 2019;47(1):e21–e27 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003497 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cuthbertson BH, Rattray J, Campbell MK, et al. The PRaCTICaL study of nurse led, intensive care follow-up programmes for improving long term outcomes from critical illness: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;339:b3723 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3723 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khandelwal N, Hough CL, Downey L, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Financial Stress in Survivors of Critical Illness. Crit Care Med 2018;46(6):e530–e39 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003076 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McPeake JM, Henderson P, Darroch G, et al. Social and economic problems of ICU survivors identified by a structured social welfare consultation. Crit Care 2019;23(1):153 doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2442-5 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sevin CM, Jackson JC. Post-ICU Clinics Should Be Staffed by ICU Clinicians. Crit Care Med 2019;47(2):268–72 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003535 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meyer J, Brett SJ, Waldmann C. Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? Yes. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(9):1539–41 doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5260-3 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vijayaraghavan BKT, Willaert X, Cuthbertson BH. Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? No. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(9):1542–44 doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5117-9 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haines K, Sevin, HIbbert E, Boehm, Aparanji K, Bakhru RN., Bastin AJ, Beesley SJ, Butcher BW, Drumright K, Eaton TL, Mikkelsen ME, Iwashyna TJ, McPeake. Key Mechanisms by Which Post-ICU Activities Can Improve In-ICU Care: Results of the International THRIVE COllaboratives. ICM in press 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jarvie L, Robinson C, MacTavish P, Dunn L, Quasim T, McPeake J. Understanding the patient journey: a mechanism to reduce staff burnout? Br J Nurs 2019;28(6):396–97 doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.6.396 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McPeake J, Shaw M, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE). Early evaluation of a complex intervention. PLoS One 2017;12(11):e0188028 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188028 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haines KJ, Beesley SJ, Hopkins RO, et al. Peer Support in Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med 2018;46(9):1522–31 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003293 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pattison N, O’Gara G, Lucas C, Gull K, Thomas K, Dolan S. Filling the gaps: A mixed- methods study exploring the use of patient diaries in the critical care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2019;51:27–34 doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.10.005 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Griffiths RD, Jones C. Filling the intensive care memory gap? Intensive Care Med 2001;27(2):344–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bienvenu OJ, Friedman LA, Colantuoni E, et al. Psychiatric symptoms after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a 5-year longitudinal study. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(1):38–47 doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5009-4 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jones C, Backman C, Griffiths RD. Intensive care diaries and relatives’ symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder after critical illness: a pilot study. Am J Crit Care 2012;21(3):172–6 doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012569 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones C, Backman C, Capuzzo M, et al. Intensive care diaries reduce new onset post traumatic stress disorder following critical illness: a randomised, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010;14(5):R168 doi: 10.1186/cc9260 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Garrouste-Orgeas M, Coquet I, Perier A, et al. Impact of an intensive care unit diary on psychological distress in patients and relatives*. Crit Care Med 2012;40(7):2033–40 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e1b43 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, et al. Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU. Crit Care Med 2017;45(1):103–28 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ketefian S, Redman RW. A critical examination of developments in nursing doctoral education in the United States. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2015;23(3):363–71 doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0797.2566 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Richards-Belle A, Mouncey PR, Wade D, et al. Psychological Outcomes following a nurse- led Preventative Psychological Intervention for critically ill patients (POPPI): protocol for a cluster-randomised clinical trial of a complex intervention. BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e020908 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020908 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khan S, Biju A, Wang S, et al. Mobile critical care recovery program (m-CCRP) for acute respiratory failure survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018;19(1):94 doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2449-2 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Haines KJ, Denehy L, Skinner EH, Warrillow S, Berney S. Psychosocial outcomes in informal caregivers of the critically ill: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2015;43(5):1112–20 doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000865 [published Online First: Epub Date]|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]