Highlights
-
•
The mean incubation period is 2-14 days, and the basic reproduction number is 2.24-3.58.
-
•
COVID-19 infection should be diagnosed clinically with typical respiratory syndromes coupled with recent exposure.
-
•
Chest computerized tomography (CT) could facilitate early diagnosis.
-
•
Public health measures, such as isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment, can curb COVID-19.
-
•
Clinical trials assessing antivirals, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids, convalescent plasma transfusion against COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19, Pandemic, Diagnosis, Isolation, Remdesivir, Clinical trials
Abstract
In December 2019, the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China spread worldwide, becoming an emergency of major international concern. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Human-to-human transmission via droplets, contaminated hands or surfaces has been described, with incubation times of 2-14 days. Early diagnosis, quarantine, and supportive treatments are essential to cure patients. This paper reviews the literature on all available information about the epidemiology, diagnosis, isolation and treatments of COVID-19. Treatments, including antiviral agents, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, antibodies, convalescent plasma transfusion and vaccines, are discussed in this article. In addition, registered trials investigating treatment options for COVID-19 infection are listed.
1. Introduction
There is a current worldwide outbreak of a new type of coronavirus (COVID-19), which originated from Wuhan, China and has now spread to 140 other countries, including Japan, Korea and Italy. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 has become a global health concern, causing severe respiratory tract infections in humans. Current evidence indicates that SARS-CoV-2 spread to humans via transmission from wild animals illegally sold in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. Phylogenetic analysis shows that SARS-CoV-2 is a new member of the Coronaviridae family but is distinct from SARS-CoV (identity of approximately 79%) and MERS-CoV (identity of approximately 50%) [1,2]. Knowing the origin of such a pathogen is critical to developing the means to block further transmission and vaccines [3]. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 shares a high level of genetic similarity (96.3%) with the bat coronavirus RaTG13, which was obtained from bats in Yunnan in 2013; however, bats are not the immediate source of SARS-CoV-2 [4].
The typical symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, sore throat, fatigue, cough or dyspnea coupled with recent exposure. As of March 16, 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 generated 168 826 confirmed cases, including 6503 deaths worldwide. In China during the outbreak of the pandemic, 42 000 doctors and nurses from all over the country supported Wuhan. Moreover, the government shared the updated genome sequence of COVID-19 to the public, and scientists from China and overseas are working closely and efficiently on this public health emergency [5,6]. Due to interventions and control measures from the government (shutting down public transportation and implementing a treatment strategy) and the change in personal behaviors (wearing masks and reducing contact with others), the number of confirmed and suspected cases in China has started to decrease.
However, the transmission of pneumonia associated with SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been eliminated. The COVID-19 outbreak is still a major challenge for clinicians. The aim of this article is to describe the epidemiology, diagnosis, isolation, and treatment of COVID-19.
2. Epidemiology
2.1. Incubation period
A study of early transmission dynamics of COVID-19 revealed that the mean incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-7.0), with the 95th percentile of the distribution at 12.5 days [7]. A later study using the travel history and symptom onset of 88 confirmed cases showed a similar mean incubation period of 6.4 days (95% CI, 5.6-7.7) [8]. An unusual case was also reported in which the incubation period was as long as 19 days [9]. Notably, a long incubation time means adjustments in screening and control policies [10]. The 19-day incubation period is a low probability event, and experts suggest 14 days for quarantine.
2.2. Basic reproduction number
The basic reproduction number is model-based, largely depends on the epidemiological setting, and is the most important parameter to determine intrinsic transmissibility. The early outbreak data largely follow exponential growth. Different models based on the clinical progression of the disease were devised to estimate the basic reproduction number. In the early stages of COVID-19, the pandemic doubled in size every 7.4 days, and the basic reproduction number was estimated to be 2.2 [7]. Another study estimated the basic reproduction number as ranging from 2.24 to 3.58 [11]. However, a deterministic compartmental model based on the likelihood and a model analysis showed that the control reproduction number may be as high as 6.47 [12]. The authors noted that this basic reproduction number was higher because the estimate accounts for 3-4 generations of viral transmission and intensive social contacts. The basic reproduction number estimated by the majority of studies ranges from 2.24 to 3.58 [13], which is slightly higher than that of SARS.
3. Diagnosis
Rapid and accurate detection of COVID-19 is crucial to control outbreaks in the community and in hospitals [14]. Current diagnostic tests for coronavirus include reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real‐time RT-PCR (rRT‐PCR), and reverse transcription loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (RT‐LAMP) [15,16]. RT-LAMP has similar sensitivity to rRT-PCR, is highly specific and is used to detect MERS-CoV [17,18]. According to current diagnostic criteria founded by the China National Health Commission, laboratory examinations, including nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab tests, have become a standard assessment for diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. To identify patients earlier, two one-step quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were developed to detect two different regions (ORF1b and N) of the SARS-CoV-2 genome [19]. Three novel RT-PCR assays targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)/helicase (Hel), spike (S), and nucleocapsid (N) genes of SARS-CoV-2 were developed. Among the three novel assays, the COVID-19-RdRp/Hel assay had the lowest limit of detection in vitro; highly sensitive and specific assays may help to improve the laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 [20]. The SARS-CoV E gene assay was more sensitive than the RdRp gene assay combined with the one-step RT-PCR system [21]. The E gene PCR was sufficient to diagnose a SARS-CoV-2 infection but the RdRp protocol was recommended to confirm a positive result [22,23]. The overall positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan was 38% [24]. The positive rate of PCR for oropharyngeal swabs is not very high: only 53.3% of COVID-19-confirmed patients had positive oral swabs tests [25]. In a series of 51 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 71% patients were RT-PCR positive at the first time of testing of throat swab or sputum samples [26]. The RT-PCR results usually become positive after several days (2-8 days) [27]. Automated solutions for molecular diagnostics can handle large numbers of samples and can be scaled to keep pace with fluctuating demand [28], [29], [30]. The good analytical performance of a molecular assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 on a high-throughput platform, the cobas 6800, was observed with minimal hands-on time, while offering fast and reliable results [31,32].
The current laboratory test is time-consuming, and a shortage of commercial kits delays diagnosis. For patients suffering from fever, sore throat, fatigue, coughing or dyspnea that is coupled with recent exposure, COVID-19 infection should be diagnosed with typical chest computerized tomography (CT) characteristics despite negative RT-PCR results [33]. Of 1014 patients, 59% had positive RT-PCR results, and 88% had positive chest CT scans [34]. COVID-19 belongs to the Coronaviridae family; therefore, it is not surprising that COVID-19 has imaging findings that are similar to those for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [35]. Typical CT findings included bilateral pulmonary parenchymal ground-glass and consolidative pulmonary opacities, sometimes with a rounded morphology and peripheral lung distribution [33]. Eighty-six percent of patients showed ground-glass opacities or consolidation, and more than one lobe (71%) with bilateral involvement (76%) was affected in the 21 initial chest CT scans [36]. Notably, lung cavitation, discrete pulmonary nodules, pleural effusions, and lymphadenopathy were absent [36]. Lung abnormalities on chest CT scan were most severe approximately 10 days after the initial onset of symptoms [37]. Chest CT scans can be used to assess the severity of COVID-19. COVID-19 also manifests with chest CT imaging abnormalities in asymptomatic patients, with rapid evolution from focal unilateral to diffuse bilateral ground-glass opacities that progressed to or co-existed with consolidations within 1-3 weeks. Combining assessment of imaging features with clinical and laboratory findings could facilitate early diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia [38], [39], [40]. As the diagnostic criteria expanded from laboratory examination to chest CT imaging, more than 14 000 patients were diagnosed on February 12, 2020.
4. Isolation
Classical public health measures, including isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment, can be used to curb the pandemic of this respiratory disease [41]. China has been preparing since 2003 to contain future pandemics by applying lessons learned from SARS [42]. In the COVID-19 pandemic, China issued the largest quarantine in history. All the residents living in mainland China were locked-in, and city public transportation, including buses, trains, ferries, and airports, were shutdown. Given the trajectory of this outbreak, the Chinese government scaled up such efforts to keep pace with the rapid increase in cases and geographical spread. The Wuhan government made full use of the gym and two convention centers and transformed them into makeshift hospitals with 3400 beds in only one night to isolate COVID-19 patients from healthy controls. More makeshift hospitals are under construction. Isolation beds were quickly expanded from only 137 at the beginning of the outbreak of COVID-19 to 56 000 to separate infected patients from non-infected individuals. The swift and decisive response of China contributed to reducing the control reproduction number and transmission risk. Due to the powerful and effective isolation measures taken by the Chinese government, the increase in COVID-19 began to slow down on February 14, 2020, according to the data released by the China National Health Commission.
5. Treatments
5.1. Antiviral agents
There is no current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to recommend any specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Lopinavir (LPV) inhibits the protease activity of coronavirus in vitro and in animal studies. A retrospective, matched-cohort study including 1052 SARS patients showed that LPV/ritonavir as initial treatment was associated with a reduced death rate (2.3% vs. 11.0%) [43]. The protease inhibitor LPV is an effective treatment based on the experience accumulated from the SARS and MERS outbreaks, indicating it is a potential treatment option for COVID‐19 [44]. Ribavirin, a guanosine analogue, is an antiviral compound used to treat several virus infections, including respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis C virus, and some viral hemorrhagic fevers. Promising results were obtained with ribavirin in a MERS-CoV rhesus macaque model [45]. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) model is targeted by ribavirin after sequence analysis, modeling, and docking to build the model. This feature increases its potential as an antiviral against SARS-CoV-2 [46].
The antiviral agent, remdesivir was designed for the Ebola virus disease [47]. Remdesivir shows broad-spectrum antiviral activity against several RNA viruses, and it may compete for RdRp [48]. Remdesivir and IFNb have superior antiviral activity to LPV and ritonavir in vitro [49]. In a mouse model of SARS-CoV pathogenesis, both prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir improved pulmonary function and reduced lung viral loads and severe lung pathology [50]. In a rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection, prophylactic remdesivir treatment was initiated 24 h prior to inoculation, and MERS-CoV did not induce clinical disease and did not replicate in respiratory tissues, thus preventing the formation of lung lesions [51]. In cell-based assays, the triphosphate form of remdesivir incorporated at position i, and RNA chain termination was delayed, which explained the high potency of remdesivir against RNA [52]. Remdesivir was used to treat the first case of COVID-19 infection in the United States: the patient's clinical condition improved after only one day of remdesivir treatment [53]. A phase II clinical trial of remdesivir was performed by the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and a phase III clinical trial was performed by the China-Japan Friendship Hospital. The results of these clinical trials will be revealed in April 2020. Remdesivir improved pulmonary function, reduced lung viral loads, and ameliorated severe lung pathology. In contrast, prophylactic LPV/RTV-IFNb only slightly reduced viral loads and did not impact other disease parameters, and therapeutic LPV/RTV-IFNb improved pulmonary function, but did not reduce virus replication or severe lung pathology [49]. Overall, these results indicated that remdesivir showed more potential than LPV/RTV-IFNb [54]. In a case report, lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra®) and arbidol were associated with significant improvements in COVID-19 patients [55]. The efficacy and safety of these antiviral agents for COVID-19 will be assessed in further clinical trials. Thirty-four trials of antiviral agents in patients with COVID‐19 have been registered up to March 15, 2020 (Table 1 ).
Table 1.
Clinical trials of antiviral agents in patients with COVID-19.
| Register number | Title | Group 1 (sample size) | Group 2 (sample size) | Group 3 (sample size) | Primary indicator | Primary sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChiCTR2000029621 | Clinical study of arbidol hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Arbidol tablets + basic treatment (190 patients) | Basic treatment (190 patients) | Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine | ||
| ChiCTR2000029308 | A randomized, controlled open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lopinavir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Lopinavir-ritonavir tablets (each containing 200 mg of lopinavir and 50 mg of ritonavir), twice a day, 2 tablets at a time (80 patients) | Conventional standardized treatment (80 patients) | Clinical improvement time of 28 days after randomization, 7-point scale | Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital (Wuhan Infectious Diseases Hospital) | |
| ChiCTR2000029387 | Comparative effectiveness and safety of ribavirin plus interferon-alpha, lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-alpha and ribavirin plus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-alpha in patients with mild to moderate novel coronavirus pneumonia | Ribavirin + Interferon alpha-1b (36 patients) | Lopinavir / ritonavir + interferon alpha-1b (36 patients) | Ribavirin + LPV/r+Interferon alpha-1b (36 patients) | Time to 2019-nCoV RNA negativity in patients | Chongqing Public Health Medical Center |
| ChiCTR2000029468 | A real-world study for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and emtritabine (FTC) / Tenofovir alafenamide Fumarate tablets (TAF) regimen in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)+ emtritabine (FTC)/ Tenofovir alafenamide Fumarate tablets (TAF) in combination (60 patients) | LPV/r (60 patients) | Survival rate | Institute of Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Sichuan People's Hospital, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences | |
| ChiCTR2000029539 | A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in patients with mild novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Conventional standardized treatment and Lopinavir-Ritonavir (164 patients) | Conventional standardized treatment (164 patients) | Incidence of adverse outcome within 14 days after admission: Patients with conscious dyspnea, SpO2 ≤94% or respiratory frequency ≥ 24 times/min in the state of resting without oxygen inhalation | Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology | |
| ChiCTR2000029541 | A randomised, open, controlled trial for darunavir/cobicistat or Lopinavir/ritonavir combined with thymosin a1 in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | DRV/c (800 mg/150 mg QD) + conventional treatment containing thymosin (40 patients) | LPV/r (400 mg/100 mg bid) + conventional treatment containing thymosin (40 patients) | Time to conversion of 2019-nCoV RNA result from RI sample | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000029548 | Randomized, open-label, controlled trial for evaluating the efficacy and safety of Baloxavir Marboxil, Favipiravir, and Lopinavir-Ritonavir in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients | BaloxavirMarboxil: 80 mg on day1, 80 mg on day 4; and 80 mg on day 7 as necessary (10 patients) | Favipiravir: 600 mg tid with 160 0mg first loading dosage for no more than 14 days (10 patients) | Lopinavir-Ritonavir: 2(200mg/50 mg), twice daily, for 14days (10 patients) | Time to viral negativity by RT-PCR,Time to clinical improvement | The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine |
| ChiCTR2000029600 | Clinical study on safety and efficacy of Favipiravir in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Alpha-Interferon atomization (30 patients) | Lopinavir and Ritonavir + alpha-Interferon atomization (30 patients) | Favipiravir + alpha-Interferon atomization(30 patients) | Negative time of novel Coronavirus by PCR, chest imaging, incidence rate of kidney damage | The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen |
| ChiCTR2000029603 | A randomized, open-label, multi-centre clinical trial evaluating and comparing the safety and efficiency of ASC09/Ritonavir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir for confirmed cases of novel Coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Conventional standardized treatment and ASC09/Ritonavir (80 patients) | Conventional standardized treatment and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (80 patients) | The incidence of composite adverse outcome | The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine | |
| ChiCTR2000029853 | A randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial for azvudine in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Oral administration of 5 tablets of 1 mg azvudine daily (10 patients) | Control group (10 patients) | Temperature, improvement of respiratory symptoms | People's Hospital of Guangshan County | |
| ChiCTR2000029996 | A randomized, open-label, controlled trial for the efficacy and safety of Farpiravir tablets in the treatment of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Tablets; 200 mg; oral; twice a day; adult dose is 1600 mg per time on first day (20 patients) | Tablets; 200 mg; orally; twice a day; adult dose is 1800 mg per time on first day (20 patients) | Tablets; 200 mg; oral; twice a day; adult dose is 2400 mg per time on first day (20 patients) | Time to clinical recovery | Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University |
| ChiCTR2000030041 | A single-arm, single-center clinical trial for azvudine tablets in the treatment of adult novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Azvudine tablets (40 patients) | The novel coronavirus nucleic acid negative rate | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | ||
| ChiCTR2000030113 | Randomized controlled trial for safety and efficacy of Favipiravir in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) with poorly responsive ritonavir/ritonavir | Ritonavir/ritonavir treatment (15 patients) | Favipiravir (15 patients) | Blood routine tests, Liver function examination, Renal function examination, Blood gas analysis, Chest CT examination | The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen | |
| ChiCTR2000030254 | A randomized, open-controlled trial for farpiravir tablets in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Farpiravir tablets (120 patients) | Abidole tablets (120 patients) | Pulse oxygen saturation parameters, respiratory support Nucleic acid test of novel coronavirus | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000030259 | Evaluation Danorevir sodium tablets combined with ritonavir in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a randomized, open and controlled trial | Danorevir sodium tablets/ritonavir oral (30 patients) | Symptomatic treatment (30 patients) | Rate of composite adverse outcomes: SpO2, PaO2/FiO2, respiratory rate | Shanghai Changzheng Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000030424 | A single-center, single-arm clinical trial for azvudine in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Azvudine Tablet: D1: 10 mg/day,QD | Negative conversion rate of the new coronavirus nucleic acid | Henan Provincial People's Hospital | ||
| ChiCTR2000030472 | An open and controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ganovo combined with ritonavir in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Ganovo/ritonavir oral + conventional treatment (10 patients) | Conventional treatment (10 patients) | Rate of composite adverse outcomes: SPO2, PaO2/FiO2 and respiratory rate | Shenyang Sixth People's Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000030487 | A single-center, single-arm clinical trial for azvudine in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Azvudine Tablet: D1: 10 mg/day, QD | Negative conversion rate of the new coronavirus nucleic acid | The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM | ||
| NCT04244591 | Glucocorticoid therapy for novel Coronavirus critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory failure (Steroids-SARI) | Methylprednisolone therapy and standard care | Standard care | Lower Murray lung injury score | Peking Union Medical College Hospital | |
| NCT04252274 | Efficacy and safety of Darunavir and Cobicistat for treatment of pneumonia caused by 2019-nCoV (DACO-nCoV) | Darunavir, Cobicistat and conventional treatments | Conventional treatments | Virological clearance rate of throat swabs, sputum, or lower respiratory tract secretions at day 7 | Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center | |
| NCT04252664 | A Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remdesivir in hospitalized adult patients with mild and moderate 2019-nCoV respiratory disease | Remdesivir | Remdesivir placebo | All cause mortality | Capital Medical University | |
| NCT04254874 | A prospective/retrospective, randomized controlled clinical study of interferon atomization in the 2019-nCoV pneumonia | Abidol hydrochloride | Abidol Hydrochloride combined with Interferon atomization | Rate of disease remission, Time for lung recovery | Tongji Hospital | |
| NCT04255017 | A prospective/retrospective, randomized controlled clinical study of antiviral therapy in the 2019-nCoV pneumonia | Abidol hydrochloride | Oseltamivir | Lopinavir/ritonavir | Rate of disease remission | Tongji Hospital |
| NCT04257656 | Severe 2019-nCoV Remdesivir randomized controlled trial (RCT) | Remdesivir | Remdesivir placebo | Time to Clinical Improvement (TTCI) | Capital Medical University | |
| NCT04260594 | Clinical study of arbidol hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of pneumonia caused by novel Coronavirus | Arbidol | Basic treatment | Virus negative conversion rate in the first week | Jieming QU | |
| NCT04261270 | A randomized, open, controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ASC09F and Ritonavir for 2019-nCoV pneumonia | ASC09F + Oseltamivir | Ritonavir + Oseltamivir | Oseltamivir | Rate of comprehensive adverse outcome | Tongji Hospital |
| NCT04261270 | A randomized, open, controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ASC09F and Ritonavir for 2019-nCoV pneumonia | ASC09F + Oseltamivir | Ritonavir + Oseltamivir | Rate of comprehensive adverse outcome | Tongji Hospital | |
| NCT04261517 | Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of pneumonia caused by 2019-nCoV (HC-nCoV) | Hydroxychloroquine and conventional treatments | Conventional treatments | Virological clearance rate of throat swabs, sputum, or lower respiratory tract secretions | Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center | |
| NCT04261907 | Evaluating and comparing the safety and efficiency of ASC09/Ritonavir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir for novel Coronavirus infection | ASC09/ritonavir | Lopinavir/ritonavir | The incidence of composite adverse outcome | First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University | |
| NCT04276688 | Lopinavir/ Ritonavir, Ribavirin and IFN-beta combination for nCoV treatment | Lopinavir/ritonavir | Ribavirin | Interferon Beta-1B | Time to negative NPS 2019-n-CoV RT-PCR | The University of Hong Kong |
| NCT04292730 | Study to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in participants with moderate Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) compared to standard of care treatment | Remdesivir | Standard of care | Proportion of participants discharged by Day 14 | Gilead Sciences | |
| NCT04292899 | Study to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in participants with severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) | Remdesivir | Standard of care | Proportion of participants With normalization of fever and oxygen saturation through Day 14 | Gilead Sciences | |
| NCT04304053 | Treatment of mild cases and chemoprophylaxis of contacts as prevention of the COVID-19 epidemic | Antiviral treatment and prophylaxis | Standard Public Health measures | Effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis assessed by incidence of secondary COVID-19 cases | Lihir Medical Centre | |
| NCT04307693 | Comparison of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or hydroxychloroquine in patients with mild Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) | Lopinavir / Ritonavir tablet | Hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablet | Viral load | Asan Medical Center |
5.2. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine
Chloroquine is a widely-used antimalarial and autoimmune disease drug that has been reported to be a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug [56], [57], [58]. Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion, as well as interfering with the glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV [59]. The first results obtained from more than 100 patients showed the apparent efficacy of chloroquine in terms of reduction of exacerbation of pneumonia, duration of symptoms and delay of viral clearance, all in the absence of severe side effects [60]. Chloroquine was included in the recommendations for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia [60,61]. The optimal dosage of chloroquine for SARS-CoV-2 will need to be assessed in future trials [62].
Hydroxychloroquine is a chloroquine analog for which there are fewer concerns about drug-drug interactions [63]. In the previous SARS outbreak, hydroxychloroquine was reported to have anti-SARS-CoV activity in vitro [64]. Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, hydroxychloroquine was found to be more potent than chloroquine in SARS-CoV-2-infected Vero cells [65]. Cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 have been reported to be increased in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection [66,67]. This may progress to a cytokine storm, followed by multiorgan failure and death. Both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have immunomodulatory effects and can suppress the immune response [68,69]. Therefore, 21 clinical studies were launched by Chinese hospitals and the University of Oxford to evaluate the efficacy of these agents in COVID-19 infection (Table 2 ). It is also necessary to determine whether the benefit of chloroquine therapy depends on the age of the patient and the clinical presentation or stage of the disease [70]. If clinical data confirm the biological results, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine may be used in prophylaxis as well as curative treatment for individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2 [71].
Table 2.
Clinical trials of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19.
| Register number | Title | Group 1 (sample size) | Group 2 (sample size) | Group 3 (sample size) | Primary indicator | Primary sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChiCTR2000029898 | Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine sulfate in comparison with phosphate chloroquine in severe patients with novel Coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a randomized, open-label, parallel, controlled trial | Hydroxychloroquine sulfate Day1: first dose: 6 tablets (0.1 g/tablet) , second dose: 6 tablets (0.1 g/tablet) after 6 h ;Day2~5: 2 tablets (0.1 g/tablet), BID (50 patients) | Phosphate chloroquine Day 1-3:500 mg, BID Day 4-5:250 mg, BID (50 patients) | TTCI (Time to Clinical Improvement) | Peking University Third Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000029988 | Clinical Study of Chloroquine Phosphate in the Treatment of Severe Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine phosphate (40 patients) | None (40 patients) | Time to Clinical Recovery | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000029542 | Study for the efficacy of chloroquine in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine (10 patients) | Conventional management (10 patients) | Viral-negative transforming time 30-day cause-specific mortality | Sun Yat sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat sen University | |
| ChiCTR2000029559 | Therapeutic effect of hydroxychloroquine on novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Hydroxychloroquine 0.1 oral 2/day (100 patients) | Hydroxychloroquine 0.2 oral 2/day (100 patients) | Starch pill oral 2/day (100 patients) | Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000029609 | A prospective, open-label, multiple-center study for the efficacy of chloroquine phosphate in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Oral chloroquine phosphate (59 mild-moderate patients and 14 severe patients) | Oral Lopinavir/ritonavir (59 mild-moderate patients and 14 severe patients) | Chloroquine phosphate plus Lopinavir/ritonavir (59 mild-moderate patients) | Virus nucleic acid-negative transforming time | The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University |
| ChiCTR2000029740 | Efficacy of therapeutic effects of hydroxycholoroquine in novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients (randomized open-label control clinical trial) | Oral intake hydroxycholoroquine 0.2 twice a day (54 patients) | Conventional therapy (24 patients) | Oxygen index, lung radiography, temperature | The First Hospital of Peking University | |
| ChiCTR2000029741 | Compare the efficacy and safety of chloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with mild/general CoVID-19 infection, and establish a standardized treatment plan. | Chloroquine phosphate (56 patients) | Control group (56 patients) | Length of stay, oxygenation index during treatment, all-cause mortality in 28 days | The Fifth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University | |
| ChiCTR2000029803 | A prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical study to evaluate the preventive effect of hydroxychloroquine on close contacts after exposure to the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) | Hydroxychloroquine, small dose and high dose (80 patients/group) | Abidol hydrochloride, small dose and high dose (80 patients/group) | Number of patients who have progressed to suspected or confirmed within 24 days of exposure to new coronavirus | Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000029826 | A randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial for comparison of phosphoric chloroquine combined with standard therapy and standard therapy in serious/critically ill patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | 2 tablets phosphoric chloroquine BID (80 patients) | 2 tablets placebo BID (40 patients) | Mortality rate | Jingzhou Central Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000029837 | A randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial for comparison of phosphoric chloroquine combined with standard therapy and standard therapy in mild/common patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | 2 tablets phosphoric chloroquine BID (80 patients) | 2 tablets placebo BID (40 patients) | Time of conversion to negative novel coronavirus nucleic acid | Jingzhou Central Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000029868 | Hydroxychloroquine treating novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial | Oral hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets (100 patients) | Conventional treatment meeting the Guideline (100 patients) | Viral nucleic acid test | Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine | |
| ChiCTR2000029898 | Evaluation the Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate in Comparison with Phosphate Chloroquine in Mild and Common Patients with Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19): a Randomized, Open-label, Parallel, Controlled Trial | Hydroxychloroquine sulfate Day1: first dose: 6 tablets (0.1 g/tablet) , second dose: 6 tablets (0.1 g/tablet) after 6 h ;Day 2~5: 2 tablets (0.1 g/tablet), BID (50 patients) | Phosphate chloroquine Day 1-3:500 mg, BID Day 4-5:250 mg, BID (50 patients) | Time to Clinical Recovery, TTCR | Peking University Third Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000029935 | A Single-arm Clinical Trial for Chloroquine Phosphate in the treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia 2019 (COVID-19) | Conventional treatment combined with Chloroquine Phosphate (100 patients) | Length of hospital stay | HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | ||
| ChiCTR2000029939 | A Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial for Chloroquine Phosphate in the treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia 2019 (COVID-19) | Conventional treatment (50 patients) | conventional treatment combined with Chloroquine Phosphate (50 patients) | Length of hospital stay | HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | |
| ChiCTR2000029988 | Clinical Study of Chloroquine Phosphate in the Treatment of Severe Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine phosphate (40 patients) | None (40 patients) | Time to clinical recovery | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| ChiCTR2000029992 | A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled trial for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine phosphate 1.0 g x 2 days for the first dose, 0.5 g x 12 days from the third day (40 patients) | Hydroxychloroquine sulfate 0.2 g bid x 14 days (40 patients) | Recommended treatment plan for novel coronavirus pneumonia severe and critical cases (20 patients) | Clinical recovery time, changes in viral load of upper and lower respiratory tract samples compared with the baseline | Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University |
| ChiCTR2000030031 | A randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial for comparison of phosphoric chloroquine combined with standard therapy and standard therapy in mild/common patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | 2 tablets phosphoric chloroquine BID 80 patients) | 2 tablets placebo BID (40 patients) | Time of conversion to negative novel coronavirus nucleic acid | The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | |
| ChiCTR2000030054 | A prospective, open label, randomized, control trial for chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in patients with mild and common novel coronavirus pulmonary (COVIP-19) | Hydroxychloroquine sulfate 0.2 g bid x 14 days a day (30 patients) | First dose of chloroquine phosphate 1 g x 2 days, and the third day was 0.5 g x 12 days (30 patients) | Recommended treatment plan for novel coronavirus pneumonia diagnosis and treatment plan (20 patients) | Clinical recovery time | Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University |
| ChiCTR2000030417 | Efficacy and safety of chloroquine phosphate inhalation combined with standard therapy in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine phosphate aerosol inhalation solution (15 patients) | Water for injection atomization inhalation (15 patients) | Temperature, respiratory symptoms | Harbin infectious diseases hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000030718 | Randomized controlled trial for Chloroquine Phosphate in the Treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Chloroquine phosphate (40 patients) | Regular treatment (40 patients) | Time to clinical recovery | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University | |
| NCT04303507 | Chloroquine Prevention of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in the Healthcare Setting | Chloroquine | Placebo | Number of symptomatic COVID-19 infections | University of Oxford |
5.3. Corticosteroids
In a study of 41 COVID-19 patients, 21% received corticosteroids, which could suppress lung inflammation [66]. The administered dose of methylprednisolone varied depending on disease severity. Current interim guidance from the WHO on the clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected (released January 28, 2020) advises against the use of corticosteroids unless indicated for another reason. The clinical outcomes of coronavirus and similar outbreaks do not support the use of corticosteroids. In a retrospective observational study of 309 adults who were critically ill with MERS, patients who were given corticosteroids were more likely to require mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy [72]. For the management of SARS, corticosteroid treatment was more associated with psychosis, diabetes and avascular necrosis [73,74]. Overall, there is no unique reason to expect that patients with COVID-19 infection will benefit from corticosteroids, and such treatment may be harmful [75]. However, according to our clinical experience, corticosteroids could be prescribed at the right time for the right patients. The clinical trials involving corticosteroids are shown in Table 3 .
Table 3.
Clinical trials of corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19.
| Register number | Title | Group 1 (sample size) | Group 2 (sample size) | Group 3 (sample size) | Primary indicator | Primary sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChiCTR2000029386 | Effectiveness of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial | Methylprednisolone, intravenous injection, 1-2 mg/kg·d for 3 days (24 patients) | Without any glucocorticoid therapy (24 patients) | SOFA score | Chongqing Public Health Medical Center | |
| ChiCTR2000029656 | A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids in hospitalized patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Standard treatment and methylprednisolone for injection (50 patients) | Standard treatment (50 patients) | Chest imaging, complications | Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital | |
| ChiCTR2000030481 | The clinical value of corticosteroid therapy timing in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a prospective randomized controlled trial | Early corticosteroid intervention (75 patients) | Middle-late corticosteroid intervention (75 patients) | No corticosteroid (50 patients) | Time of duration of COVID-19 nucleic acid RT-PCR test results of respiratory specimens change to negative | Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University |
| NCT0424459 | The efficacy of different hormone doses in 2019-nCoV severe pneumonia | Methylprednisolone (<40 mg/d intravenous drip for 7 days) | Methylprednisolone (40~80 mg/d intravenous drip for 7 days) | Rate of disease remission, rate and time of entering the critical stage | Tongji Hospital |
5.4. Antibodies
The development of vaccines and therapeutic antibodies against COVID-19 has important implications. Considering the relatively high identity of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) in SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, the cross-reactivity of anti-SARS-CoV antibodies with the COVID-19 spike protein was assessed. The spike protein is the major inducer of neutralizing antibodies. Fortunately, the SARS-CoV-specific human monoclonal antibody CR3022 binds potently with the COVID-19 RBD [76]. However, other SARS-CoV RBD-directed antibodies 230, m396 and 80R cannot bind to the COVID-19 RBD [77]. CR3022 may be a potential therapeutic candidate, alone or in combination with other neutralizing antibodies, for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infections. Antibodies MAb114 and REGN-EB3 were designed for treatment of Ebola virus infection and significantly reduce mortality from Ebola virus disease [47]. Monoclonal antibodies can only recognize a single antigen epitope, which limits the use of MAb114 and REGN-EB3 in the treatment of COVID-19. However, the development of COVID-19-specific antibodies requires a long time. It is not easy to apply monoclonal antibodies for new pathogens to clinical practice in a short time.
5.5. Convalescent plasma transfusion
Convalescent plasma was administered early after symptom onset in the treatment of SARS, and the pooled odds of mortality following treatment was reduced compared with placebo or no therapy (odds ratio, 0.25) [78]. However, in Ebola virus disease, the transfusion of up to 500 mL of convalescent plasma in 84 patients was not associated with a significant improvement in survival [79]. In a laboratory test, the COVID-19 virus was isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a critically ill patient, and it could be neutralized by sera from several patients [80]. Current clinical trials involving convalescent plasma transfusion are shown in Table 4 . The National Health Commission of China appealed to convalescent patients to donate blood for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. Convalescent plasma should be collected within two weeks after recovery to ensure a high neutralization antibody titer. The difficulty in obtaining plasma during convalescence limits its clinical application. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy in patients with COVID-19 infection.
Table 4.
Clinical trials of convalescent plasma transfusion in patients with COVID-19Searched on http://www.chictr.org.cn/ and https://clinicaltrials.gov/. As of March 15, 2020.
| Register number | Title | Group 1 (sample size) | Group 2 (sample size) | Primary indicator | Primary sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChiCTR2000030039 | Clinical study for infusing convalescent plasma to treat patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Conventional therapy with infusion of convalescent plasma: 200-500 mL (30 patients) | Conventional therapy (30 patients) | Viral load, SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels | Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University |
| ChiCTR2000029757 | Convalescent plasma for the treatment of severe and critical novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a prospective randomized controlled trial | Conventional treatment and convalescent plasma therapy (100 patients) | Conventional treatment (100 patients) | Number of days between randomized grouping and clinical improvement | China-Japan Friendship Hospital |
| ChiCTR2000029850 | Study on convalescent plasma treatment for severe patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Standardized comprehensive treatment combined with convalescent plasma treatment (10 patients) | Standardized comprehensive treatment (10 patients) | Fatality rate | The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine |
| ChiCTR2000030010 | A randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 virus inactivated plasma in the treatment of severe novel coronavirus pneumonia patients (COVID-19) | Anti-SARS-CoV-2 virus-inactivated plasma (50 patients) | Ordinary plasma (50 patients) | Improvement of clinical symptoms | Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital (Wuhan Infectious Diseases Hospital) |
| ChiCTR2000030046 | A single arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-2019-nCoV inactivated convalescent plasma in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia patient (COVID-19) | Anti-2019-nCoV virus-inactivated plasma (10 patients) | Changes to clinical symptoms, laboratory and radiological data | First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District | |
| ChiCTR2000030179 | Experimental study of novel coronavirus pneumonia rehabilitation plasma therapy severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) | Routine treatment + plasma treatment (50 patients) | Routine treatment (50 patients) | Cure rate, mortality | The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University |
| ChiCTR2000030381 | A randomized, open-label, controlled and single-center trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2-inactivated convalescent plasma in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patient | Conventional treatment and anti-SARS-CoV-2 virus-inactivated plasma (20 patients) | Conventional treatment and ordinary plasma (20 patients) | Clinical symptom improvement | First People's Hospital of Jiangxi District, Wuhan |
| ChiCTR2000030627 | Study for using the healed novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients plasma in the treatment of severe critical cases | Convalescent plasma therapy + routine treatment (15 patients) | Routine treatment (15 patients) | Temperature, virus nucleic acid detection | The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University |
| ChiCTR2000030702 | Plasma of the convalescent in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) common patient: a prospective clinical trial | Conventional treatment and convalescent plasma therapy (25 patients) | Conventional treatment (25 patients) | Time to clinical recovery after randomization | China-Japan Friendship Hospital |
| NCT04292340 | Anti-SARS-CoV-2 inactivated convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19 | Anti-SARS-CoV-2-inactivated convalescent plasma | Virological clearance rate of throat swabs, sputum, or lower respiratory tract secretions | Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center |
5.6. Vaccines
The structure of SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been revealed, and this should enable the rapid development and evaluation of medical countermeasures to address the ongoing public health crisis [77]. These findings provide the basis for further studies to optimize vaccination strategies for this emerging infection. The majority of the vaccines being developed for coronaviruses target the spike glycoprotein or S protein [81]. Vaccine development is a long process, and no vaccines are available at the time of a pandemic outbreak. For example, the Ebola epidemic outbreak occurred in 2013, and three years later, the rVSV Ebola Vaccine was selected for phase I clinical trials for its safety and immunogenicity in Africa and Europe [82]. In November 2019, the European Commission granted marketing authorization to Merck Sharp and Dohme B.V. in Europe for their Ebola vaccine, Ervebo. Fortunately, Moderna company announced on February 24, 2020 that the company's experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, known as mRNA-1273, is ready for human testing. It is a remarkably fast development cycle to develop an initial vaccine just weeks after identifying the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence. The clinical trial of safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 in the treatment of COVID-19 is under investigation (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04283461). Moreover, a new oral SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been successfully developed at Tianjin University, which uses food-grade safe Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a carrier and targets the S protein. There are 18 biotechnology companies and universities in China working on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been developed much faster than those for Ebola because of the collaborative efforts of scientists around the world and the fast-track approval of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development efforts by the Chinese health organizations.
6. Conclusions
Bats have been recognized as a natural reservoir and vectors of a variety of coronaviruses, and these viruses have crossed species barriers to infect humans and many different kinds of animals, including avians, rodents, and chiropters [83,84]. While the origin of COVID-19 is still being investigated, COVID-19 has features typical of the Coronaviridae family and was classified in the beta-coronavirus 2b lineage. COVID-19 can be transmitted between humans. Interventions, including intensive contact tracing followed by quarantine and isolation, can effectively reduce the spread of COVID-19, with the effect of travel restrictions. Wearing masks, washing hands and disinfecting surfaces contribute to reducing the risk of infection. Human coronaviruses can be efficiently inactivated within 1 min using surface disinfection procedures with 62-71% ethanol, 0.5% hydrogen peroxide or 0.1% sodium hypochlorite [85].
Identification of the causative viral pathogens of respiratory tract viral infections is important to select an appropriate treatment, control the pandemic, and reduce the economic impact of COVID-19 on China and the world. In acute respiratory infection, RT-PCR is routinely used to detect causative viruses from respiratory secretions. The positive rate of PCR from oropharyngeal swabs is not very high. In this situation, more swab testing is needed to clarify diagnosis. Typical CT findings can help early screening of suspected cases and diagnosis of COVID-19.
The COVID-19 infection has a clustering onset and is more likely to affect older males (average age 51 years) with comorbidities [86]. No evidence supports adverse birth outcomes, intrauterine infection, or vertical transmission of COVID-19 [87]. However, viral infections can be acquired when the infant passes through the birth canal during vaginal delivery or through postpartum breastfeeding [88]. The most common symptoms were fever, cough, expectoration, headache, myalgia or fatigue, diarrhea, and hemoptysis [89]. Some people may experience severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Histological examination of lung biopsy samples showed bilateral diffuse alveolar damage with cellular fibromyxoid exudates [90]. Other organs are also susceptible to COVID-19. The single-cell RNA-seq data was used to analyse receptor ACE2 expression to reveal the potential risk of different human organs to COVID-19 infection [91]. COVID-19 uses the same cell entry receptor as SARS-CoV, ACE2, which regulates both cross-species and human-to-human transmissions [80]. Proximal tubular cells also express higher levels of the ACE2 receptor, which leads to susceptibility to COVID-19 [91] and induces kidney injury. Data from 33 patients with a complete clinical course were analysed, and the levels of blood urea and creatinine were higher in non-survivors than in survivors [92].
All patients with COVID-19-infected pneumonia received antibacterial agents, 90% received antiviral therapy, and 45% received methylprednisolone [92]. Clinical trials are underway to investigate the efficacy of new antiviral drugs, convalescent plasma transfusion, and vaccines. Most of the trials were initiated by investigators and the study period is 1 to 11 months. Although the final results of these studies will take a long time to complete, the interim research data may provide some help for the current urgent demand for therapy [93].
The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency of international concern, and all countries need a coordinated international effort to fight COVID-19. The transmission of pneumonia associated with SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been eliminated. In the absence of vaccines and antivirals, isolation and quarantine are achieving remarkable results. It is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of COVID-19 and to develop drugs and vaccines against the COVID-19 infection as soon as possible.
Declarations
Funding: This work was supported by the Professional Development Research Project of the National Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. JDZX2015295) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81701962).
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Approval: Not required
Editor: Jean-Marc Rolain
References
- 1.Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lu R., Zhao X., Li J., Niu P., Yang B., Wu H. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xiao C., Li X., Liu S., Sang Y., Gao S.J., Gao F. HIV-1 did not contribute to the 2019-nCoV genome. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:378–381. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1727299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paraskevis D., Kostaki E.G., Magiorkinis G., Panayiotakopoulos G., Sourvinos G., Tsiodras S. Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;79 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harcourt J., Tamin A., Lu X., Kamili S., Sakthivel S.K., Murray J. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from patient with 2019 novel Coronavirus disease, United States. Emerging Infect Dis. 2020;26 doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu F., Zhao S., Yu B., Chen Y.M., Wang W., Song Z.G. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li Q., Guan X., Wu P., Wang X., Zhou L., Tong Y. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel Coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Backer J.A., Klinkenberg D., Wallinga J. Incubation period of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20-28 January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.5.2000062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bai Y., Yao L., Wei T., Tian F., Jin D.Y., Chen L. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang X., Rayner S., Luo M.H. Does SARS-CoV-2 has a longer incubation period than SARS and MERS? J Med Virol. 2020;92:476–478. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhao S., Lin Q., Ran J., Musa S.S., Yang G., Wang W. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;92:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tang B., Wang X., Li Q., Bragazzi N.L., Tang S., Xiao Y. Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and Its implication for public health interventions. J Clin Med. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lai C.C., Shih T.P., Ko W.C., Tang H.J., Hsueh P.R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.To K.K., Tsang O.T., Chik-Yan Yip C., Chan K.H., Wu T.C., Chan J.M.C. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bhadra S., Jiang Y.S., Kumar M.R., Johnson R.F., Hensley L.E., Ellington A.D. Real-time sequence-validated loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for detection of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chan J.F., Choi G.K., Tsang A.K., Tee K.M., Lam H.Y., Yip C.C. Development and evaluation of novel real-time reverse transcription-PCR Assays with locked nucleic acid probes targeting leader sequences of human-pathogenic Coronaviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2722–2726. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01224-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang P., Wang H., Cao Z., Jin H., Chi H., Zhao J. A Rapid and Specific Assay for the Detection of MERS-CoV. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1101. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee S.H., Baek Y.H., Kim Y.H., Choi Y.K., Song M.S., Ahn J.Y. One-pot reverse transcriptional loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) for detecting MERS-CoV. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2166. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chu D.K.W., Pan Y., Cheng S.M.S., Hui K.P.Y., Krishnan P., Liu Y. Molecular diagnosis of a novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia. Clin Chem. 2020 doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chan J.F., Yip C.C., To K.K., Tang T.H., Wong S.C., Leung K.H. Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JCM.00310-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Konrad R., Eberle U., Dangel A., Treis B., Berger A., Bengs K. Rapid establishment of laboratory diagnostics for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in Bavaria, Germany, February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cordes A.K., Heim A. Rapid random access detection of the novel SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2, previously 2019-nCoV) using an open access protocol for the Panther Fusion. J Clin Virol. 2020;125 doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corman V.M., Landt O., Kaiser M., Molenkamp R., Meijer A., Chu D.K.W. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu R., Han H., Liu F., Lv Z., Wu K., Liu Y. Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;505:172–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang W., Du R.H., Li B., Zheng X.S., Yang X.L., Hu B. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:386–389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fang Y., Zhang H., Xie J., Lin M., Ying L., Pang P. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang P., Liu T., Huang L., Liu H., Lei M., Xu W. Use of chest CT in combination with negative RT-PCR assay for the 2019 novel Coronavirus but high clinical suspicion. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cobb B., Simon C.O., Stramer S.L., Body B., Mitchell P.S., Reisch N. The cobas(R) 6800/8800 system: a new era of automation in molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17:167–180. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1275962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marlowe E.M., Hardy D., Krevolin M., Gohl P., Bertram A., Arcenas R. High-throughput testing of urogenital and extragenital specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with Cobas((R)) CT/NG. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2017;7:176–186. doi: 10.1556/1886.2017.00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Greub G., Sahli R., Brouillet R., Jaton K. Ten years of R&D and full automation in molecular diagnosis. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:403–425. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eigner U., Reucher S., Hefner N., Staffa-Peichl S., Kolb M., Betz U. Clinical evaluation of multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus using a high throughput system. J Virol Methods. 2019;269:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pfefferle S., Reucher S., Nörz D., Lütgehetmann M. Evaluation of a quantitative RT-PCR assay for the detection of the emerging coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 using a high throughput system. Euro Surveill. 2020;25 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xie X., Zhong Z., Zhao W., Zheng C., Wang F., Liu J. Chest CT for typical 2019-nCoV pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ai T., Yang Z., Hou H., Zhan C., Chen C., Lv W. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Das K.M., Lee E.Y., Al Jawder S.E., Enani M.A., Singh R., Skakni L. Acute Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: temporal lung changes observed on the chest radiographs of 55 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W267–W274. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chung M., Bernheim A., Mei X., Zhang N., Huang M., Zeng X. CT imaging features of 2019 novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pan F., Ye T., Sun P., Gui S., Liang B., Li L. Time course of lung changes on chest CT During recovery from 2019 novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shi H., Han X., Jiang N., Cao Y., Alwalid O., Gu J. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xu X., Yu C., Qu J., Zhang L., Jiang S., Huang D. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1275–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Y., Kang H., Liu X., Tong Z. Combination of RT-qPCR testing and clinical features for diagnosis of COVID-19 facilitates management of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wilder-Smith A., Freedman D.O. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020;27 doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhong N.S., Zeng G.Q. Pandemic planning in China: applying lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome. Respirology. 2008;13(Suppl 1):S33–S35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chan K.S., Lai S.T., Chu C.M., Tsui E., Tam C.Y., Wong M.M.L. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9:399–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yao T.-T., Qian J.-D., Zhu W.-Y., Wang Y., Wang G.-Q. A systematic review of lopinavir therapy for SARS coronavirus and MERS coronavirus-A possible reference for coronavirus disease-19 treatment option. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Falzarano D., de Wit E., Rasmussen A.L., Feldmann F., Okumura A., Scott D.P. Treatment with interferon-α2b and ribavirin improves outcome in MERS-CoV-infected rhesus macaques. Nat Med. 2013;19:1313–1317. doi: 10.1038/nm.3362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Elfiky A.A. Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19. Life Sci. 2020;248 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mulangu S., Dodd L.E., Davey R.T., Jr., Tshiani Mbaya O., Proschan M., Mukadi D. A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2293–2303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tchesnokov E.P., Feng J.Y., Porter D.P., Gotte M. Mechanism of inhibition of Ebola virus RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase by remdesivir. Viruses. 2019;11 doi: 10.3390/v11040326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sheahan T.P., Sims A.C., Leist S.R., Schafer A., Won J., Brown A.J. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11:222. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sheahan T.P., Sims A.C., Graham R.L., Menachery V.D., Gralinski L.E., Case J.B. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.de Wit E., Feldmann F., Cronin J., Jordan R., Okumura A., Thomas T. Prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir (GS-5734) treatment in the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:6771–6776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922083117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gordon C.J., Tchesnokov E.P., Feng J.Y., Porter D.P., Gotte M. The antiviral compound remdesivir potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Biol Chem. 2020 doi: 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Holshue M.L., DeBolt C., Lindquist S., Lofy K.H., Wiesman J., Bruce H. First case of 2019 novel Coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Martinez M.A. Compounds with therapeutic potential against novel respiratory 2019 coronavirus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00399-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang Z., Chen X., Lu Y., Chen F., Zhang W. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic procedure for four cases with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia receiving combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment. Biosci Trends. 2020;14:64–68. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Savarino A., Di Trani L., Donatelli I., Cauda R., Cassone A. New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:67–69. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70361-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yan Y., Zou Z., Sun Y., Li X., Xu K.F., Wei Y. Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model. Cell Res. 2013;23:300–302. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rolain J.M., Colson P., Raoult D. Recycling of chloroquine and its hydroxyl analogue to face bacterial, fungal and viral infections in the 21st century. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vincent M.J., Bergeron E., Benjannet S., Erickson B.R., Rollin P.E., Ksiazek T.G. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J. 2005;2:69. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gao J., Tian Z., Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends. 2020;14:72–73. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.[Expert consensus on chloroquine phosphate for the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia] Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43:185–188. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Colson P., Rolain J.M., Lagier J.C., Brouqui P., Raoult D. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jallouli M., Galicier L., Zahr N., Aumaitre O., Frances C., Le Guern V. Determinants of hydroxychloroquine blood concentration variations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:2176–2184. doi: 10.1002/art.39194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Biot C., Daher W., Chavain N., Fandeur T., Khalife J., Dive D. Design and synthesis of hydroxyferroquine derivatives with antimalarial and antiviral activities. J Med Chem. 2006;49:2845–2849. doi: 10.1021/jm0601856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yao X., Ye F., Zhang M., Cui C., Huang B., Niu P. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chen L., Liu H.G., Liu W., Liu J., Liu K., Shang J. [Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia] Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43:203–208. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schrezenmeier E., Dorner T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16:155–166. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Savarino A., Boelaert J.R., Cassone A., Majori G., Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:722–727. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00806-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Touret F., de Lamballerie X. Of chloroquine and COVID-19. Antiviral Res. 2020;177 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Colson P., Rolain J.M., Raoult D. Chloroquine for the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Arabi Y.M., Mandourah Y., Al-Hameed F., Sindi A.A., Almekhlafi G.A., Hussein M.A. Corticosteroid therapy for critically ill patients with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:757–767. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1172OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lee N., Allen Chan K.C., Hui D.S., Ng E.K., Wu A., Chiu R.W. Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients. J Clin Virol. 2004;31:304–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee D.T., Wing Y.K., Leung H.C., Sung J.J., Ng Y.K., Yiu G.C. Factors associated with psychosis among patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1247–1249. doi: 10.1086/424016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Russell C.D., Millar J.E., Baillie J.K. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020;395:473–475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tian X., Li C., Huang A., Xia S., Lu S., Shi Z. Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:382–385. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., Goldsmith J.A., Hsieh C.L., Abiona O. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mair-Jenkins J., Saavedra-Campos M., Baillie J.K., Cleary P., Khaw F.M., Lim W.S. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:80–90. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.van Griensven J., Edwards T., de Lamballerie X., Semple M.G., Gallian P., Baize S. Evaluation of convalescent plasma for Ebola virus disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:33–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., Hu B., Zhang L., Zhang W. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Du L., He Y., Zhou Y., Liu S., Zheng B.J., Jiang S. The spike protein of SARS-CoV–a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:226–236. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Agnandji S.T., Huttner A., Zinser M.E., Njuguna P., Dahlke C., Fernandes J.F. Phase 1 Trials of rVSV Ebola vaccine in Africa and Europe. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1647–1660. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhang N., Wang L., Deng X., Liang R., Su M., He C. Recent advances in the detection of respiratory virus infection in humans. J Med Virol. 2020;92:408–417. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mackenzie J.S., Jeggo M. Reservoirs and vectors of emerging viruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2013;3:170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kampf G., Todt D., Pfaender S., Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and its inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect. 2020;104:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chen N., Zhou M., Dong X., Qu J., Gong F., Han Y. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395:507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Chen H., Guo J., Wang C., Luo F., Yu X., Zhang W. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395:809–815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schwartz D.A., Graham A.L. Potential maternal and infant outcomes from (Wuhan) Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Infecting pregnant women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and other human Coronavirus infections. Viruses. 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/v12020194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xu X.W., Wu X.X., Jiang X.G., Xu K.J., Ying L.J., Ma C.L. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. BMJ. 2020;368:m606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Xu Z., Shi L., Wang Y., Zhang J., Huang L., Zhang C. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zou X., Chen K., Zou J., Han P., Hao J., Han Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0754-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang D., Hu B., Hu C., Zhu F., Liu X., Zhang J. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhang Q., Wang Y., Qi C., Shen L., Li J. Clinical trial analysis of 2019-nCoV therapy registered in China. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]