Skip to main content
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran logoLink to Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
. 2020 Feb 10;34:3. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.3

Effects of microRNAs polymorphism in cancer progression

Simin SiamiGorji 1, Isa Jorjani 1, Alireza Tahamtan 2, Abdolvahab Moradi 2,*
PMCID: PMC7139258  PMID: 32284927

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known as a new class of small RNAs (18-25 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression at multiple levels from transcription to translation. Considering the important role of miRNAs in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, any variations in their expression can contribute to various anomalies, such as tumorigenesis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have received much attention as potential genetic markers for diseases due to their advantage of being present at a high frequency in the human genome. SNPs can occur in different parts of the miRNA genes (primary, precursor, and mature) which result in pathological conditions. In this study, recent findings related to the effects of SNPs in miRNAs on their biogenesis and functions and their role in cancer development and progression are discussed. This review was performed using PubMed to search for related reports. The identified effects may be useful for clinical decision-making and providing important new information about the pathophysiology of miRNAs.

Keywords: MicroRNAs, Noncoding RNAs, Single nucleotide polymorphisms, Mutation, Cancer


↑ What is “already known” in this topic:

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known as a new class of small RNAs (18-25 nucleotides) which regulate gene expression at multiple levels from transcription to translation. Considering the important role of miRNAs in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, any variations in their expression can contribute to various anomalies, such as tumorigenesis.

→ What this article adds:

In this study, recent findings related to the effects of SNPs on miRNAs on their biogenesis and functions and their role in cancer development and progression are discussed. The identified effects may be useful for clinical decision-making and providing important new information about the pathophysiology of miRNAs.

Introduction

Nearly 1.5% of the human genome is transcribed and translated to protein, and this process leads to creation of a wide variety of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), rRNAs, and tRNAs (1). Also, miRNAs are identified in eukaryotes and attach to the regulatory elements of target mRNA. They tend to negatively regulate the expression of a large number of target genes through the degree of complementarity between the miRNAs and the target genes. Moreover, miRNAs are able to intensify the expression of target genes and regulate transcription and translation. Changes in miRNA s that lead to abnormalities are categorized in 2 ways: The first category is the variation of the cis factors, such as chromosomal changes, epigenetic changes, mutations in the promoter elements, and polymorphism in the miRNA sequence. The second category is changes in transfactors, such as polymorphism in the target genes, mutation in the regulatory and processing elements (2).

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common and prevalent genetic variation that can affect miRNAs function. It is thought that SNPs in miRNA affect miRNAs function in different levels: SNP in Pri-miR (primary-miRNA), SNP in Pre-miR (precursor-RNA), SNP in miRNA biogenesis genes, SNPs in mature miRNA sequences, and mRNA binding-site (3). While it is believed that single mutations do not directly affect the expression of cancer cells, recent studies have shown that the small changes in miRNAs can affect tumorigenesis. It has been proposed that SNPs in miRNAs play a role in the genes processing machines, binding status, cancer treatment quality, and prognosis of patients (4). Despite the key role of genetic changes in the development of tumors, no comprehensive study has been reported in the literature on this subject. This review discusses whether subtle changes, such as SNPs in different sequences of miRNAs, have different effects on the activity of the miRNAs, cell function, and cancer formation.

miRNAs and tumorigenesis

Cancer is caused by accumulation of genetic changes and subsequently inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (TS-genes) and protoncogens activation. Some special miRNAs serve as a tumor suppressor (TS-miR) and oncogene (onco-miR), thus, their downexpression and overexpression interfere with tumor susceptibility. Deregulation of miRNAs expression through destroying cellular arrangement in normal tissues leads to malignant formation, which results from different mechanisms, e.g., chromosomal abnormalities, epigenetic changes, alterations in the miR-processing machinery, and genomic mutations /polymorphisms (5).

Chromosomal abnormalities

About half of human miRs genes and clusters exist in (or around) the chromosomal fragile site (FRAs) and cancer-associated genomic regions (CAGRs). FRAs are prone to genomic instability events, such as chromatid exchange, translocation, deletion, amplification, and copy number variation (CNV). These events might change miRs correct sequence and structure or their target dosage, therefore interfere with normal gene regulation and cause abnormalities (6). Some miRs beside Dicer and Drosha were subjected to CNVs and repeatedly proliferated in NSCLC (nonsmall cell lung cancer) (7).

Epigenetic changes

The regulatory effect of epigenetic on miRs has been achieved through DNA hyper methylation, hypo methylation, and destruction of histone modification patterns in human tumors. In other words, tumor formation might be due to epigenetically silenced TS-miRNAs or activated oncomiRs by aberrant hyper and hypo methylation of CpG islands located around these genes, respectively or by posttranscriptional modifications of nucleosomal histone proteins modifications (8).

Alterations in the miRNA processing machinery

The biogenesis of miRs in tumor samples is different from normal ones. There is a decreasing expression of Dicer and Drosha in various types of cancer. In fact, the precise location and direction of Drosha cleavage for creating a mature miRs is very important, because the second cleavage occurs at a certain distance from the free end (9). Any variation which leads to down/overexpression of miRs biogenesis genes in the cell directly changes the miRs expression and indirectly alter their targets in different tissues.

Genomic mutations and polymorphism

The mutation and polymorphism in miRs transcript can affect their expression by altering the processing or sequence of miRs (6). This finding confirms that every aberration in miRs expression can be the cornerstone of genetic deregulation and carcinogenic. In this review, the SNPs were categorized and the effect of SNPs in miRs sequence, miRs-processing genes, and miR-target-site and miRs regulatory elements were determined.

The effects of miRNAs on cellular microenvironment

One of the major characteristics of tumorous cell is deregulation of gene networks that cause alteration in normal cells. Cellular microenvironments cover a high range of cell types, such as the extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, and stem cells. They can play as “game changer” which may affect the progression phase of malignancy or maintain it in silent stage. Correlation between the microenvironment cells in the vicinity of tumor cells is arranged by miRNAs. miRNAs have 2 key roles in the evolution of tumor microenvironments from normal cells: miRNAs in tumor cells recruit noncell mechanism autonomously to modify microenvironments, and they fixate oncogenic properties. Angiogenesis, invasion, and tumor-stromal interactions are results of miRNAs’ regulation (10).

Effect of SNPs on miRNAs

Heterogeneous distribution of SNPs across the genome leads to more aggregation in noncoding regions than coding regions. A large number of SNPs located in the noncoding regions of the genome are functional including the miRNAs and their target sites. Indeed, these SNPs change the level of gene expression instead of altering the protein's performance (11). miR-SNPs are often found in QTL (quantitative trait loci), chromosomal FRAs, and tumor potential sites, indicating their ability to genetically control complex characteristics. There are several methods to show the effect of human abnormality-related SNPs on miRs expression level: I. SNPs in miRs biogenesis pathways, which interfere with miRs-processing; II. SNPs in miRs sequence interfere with maturation process; and III. SNPs in miRs’ promoter and target genes, which change the expression levels and lose the binding efficiency to miRs (12).

The consequences of SNPs in miR sequences are aberrant expression of hundreds of genes and pathways (3). For instance, some studies demonstrated that most SNPs in miRs (pre/mature) changed targets expression level via changing mature-miRs frequency (13). Mature-miR SNPs are classified into 2 subgroups: 1. SNPs in 5’-seed region affect target recognition and stability of miR-mRNAs interaction; 2. SNPs in 3’-mismatch tolerant region that may withstand mismatch (3). Seed-SNPs interfere with pri to pre-miR conversion and also post-transcription regulations via altering miR-target sites (13, 14). Some seed-SNPs that are phenotypically neutral, facilitate miRs’ evolution toward new miRs with more specialized operation. Principally, miRs variations can eliminate binding to key targets and create a seed sequence which targets new mRNAs, changing the regulatory growth proteins balance (14).

Effect of SNPs on 3'UTR of miR-target genes in cancers

The 3’untranslated regions (3’UTRs) are involved in various levels of mRNA in the regulation of genes expression. Also, 3'UTR-SNPs, as miRs-binding site, by modifying the regulatory loops between them cause genetic changes, and subsequently trigger malignancies. In fact, by changing polyadenylation, mRNA-miRNA and mRNA-protein interaction influence mRNA stability and translation. The effect of 3'UTR-SNPs on changing target sequence and target’s second structure has been surveyed. The degree of alteration in mRNA second structure show the possible availability for miRs-targeting which has been used in predicting the creation or degradation of the miR-binding-site (15). In this regard, 2 categories are provided: 3'UTR-SNPs, which make illegitimate-miR target sites, can cause tumor risk dependent on TS-miRs, or oncomiRs (16-19). 3'UTR-SNPs which destroy miR-binding position are associated with cancer susceptibility (18-21) (Table 1). These achievements indicate the importance of abnormality-associated-SNPs located in UTR within or near the miRs-binding sites in various cancers.

Table 1. Effect of SNP in miR-target genes on cancers .

Target gene miRNAs SNP Position Type of SNP Effect of SNP Cancer Reference
TYRP1 miR-155 rs683/rs910 3′UTR non-coding Illegitimate miR-target site Melanoma (16)
KIT miR-221 miR-222 rs17084733 3'UTR non-coding Illegitimate miR-target site Thyroid (17)
RPA2 miR-3149 miR-1183 rs7356 3′UTR non-coding Illegitimate miR-target site Colorectal (18)
ARHGAP26 miR-18a-3p rs187729 3'UTR non-coding Illegitimate miR-target site ALL, CML (19)
TLX1
IRF8
miR-492
miR-330
rs2742038
rs10514611
3′UTR
3′UTR
non-coding Illegitimate miR-target site ALL
CML
(19)
KRAS let-7 rs61764370 3′UTR non-coding Target-site destruction Ovarian (20)
GTF2H1 miR-518a miR-527 rs4596 3′UTR non-coding Target-site destruction Colorectal (18)
ETV6 miR-34c miR-449b rs1573613 3′UTR non-coding Target-site destruction ALL (19)
ESR1 miR-453 rs2747648 3′UTR non-coding Target-site destruction Breast (21)

Effect of SNPs on miRNAs’ sequence in cancer

Generally, miRs are divided into 4 groups based on genomic location related to intron and exon: (1) intronic miRs in ncRNA transcripts; (2) intronic miRs in protein-coding genes; (3) exonic miRs in ncRNA transcripts, such as miR-22 and miR-198; and (4) exonic miRs in protein-coding genes. For instance, miR-985 is found in the last exon of CACNG8 gene (22). Also, miRs placed in noncoding regions between genes are called intergenic. Noncoding SNPs refer to those which occur in noncoding gene regions, including miRs sequence, regulatory regions, intronic and intergenic regions presence in coding genes. MIRs-related-SNPs that involve in tumorigenesis can also exist in miR’s host genes, which encode tumor-related proteins (23).

SNPs in miRNAs found in introns of protein-coding genes

A separate evaluation of miRs based on origin explicitly addresses the SNPs presence in miRs and their possible association with various tumors. Accordingly, rs928508 in intronic-mir-30c1 (24) reduces mature and pre-miR-30c level in NSCLC through heterogeneous genotypes (AG/GG) (25). The homozygous genotype of this polymorphism also results in altered miRNA expression by altering miRNA structure, which has been observed in gastric cancer (26). Table 2 displays other examples of intronic miRs as such, SNP, which interfere with miR maturation (27-30).

Table 2. Effect of SNP in miRNAs on various cancer .
miRNA Location SNP SNP in miR sequence Cancer type Reference
miR-30c-1 Intron of coding region rs928508 pre-miRNA Gastric (26)
miR-499 Intron of coding region rs3746444 T>C Pre-miR-499 Prostate (27)
miR-26a Intron of coding region rs7372209 pri-miR26a-1 OPL (28)
miR-608 Intron of coding region rs4919510 C>G mature-miR ESCC (30)
miR-618 Intron of coding region rs2682818 C>A pre-miR-618 Lymphoma (29)
miR-15a~16-1 Intron of ncRNA transcript
(DLEU2)
G>C83 pre-miR-16-1 CLL (32)
let-7/miR-98 cluster Intron of
mlncRNAs units
rs629367 pri-let-7a-2 Gastric (33)
miR-181 Intron of ncRNA
transcript
Rare variant pre-miR-181b-2 Thyroid (34)
miR-646 Intron of host gene (AK309218) rs6513497 T>G
rs112880289/ rs6513496
seed
stem-loop
HCC (35)
miR-146a Exon of ncRNA transcript rs2910164 G>C seed/ pre-miR Gastric (37)
miR-101-1 Exon of ncRNA transcript rs578481
rs705509
rs7536540 G>C
pri-miR-101-1 Oral cell (38)
miR-29b-2 Exon of ncRNA transcript rs141961287
rs12401619
rs12410786
pri-miR-29b-2 CLL (32)
miR-371-372-373 Intergenic rs3859501 C>A pri-miRNAs HCC (41)
miR-196 cluster Intergenic rs11614913 C>T mature-miR Breast (42)
miR-125a Intergenic rs12976445 pri-miR-125a Breast (43)
miRNA-1268a Intergenic rs28599926 pre-miR Astrocytoma (44)

SNPs in miRNAs found in introns of noncoding transcription units

Sometimes, transcription units, which lack the ability of coding protein, serve as a location for a number of intronic-miRs. ncRNAs transcripts are sometimes known as mRNA-like-ncRNAs (mlncRNAs) because they share common characteristics with mRNAs such as splicing and polyadenylation. A to C SNP in miR-30c-2, as an instance of this group (24), may be effective in target gene-selecting and inefficient miR processing, if located in mature miR and pri-miR, respectively (31). Some examples of miRs in intronic ncRNAs accompanied by related SNPs are presented in Table 2. In fact, many studies have determined the SNPs influence on miR frequency and predisposition to various cancers risk (32-35).

SNPs in miRNAs located in exons of noncoding transcription units

Approximately, 10% of miRs are encoded in exonic regions (22). ncRNAs, whose only important activity is acting as miR-host gene, contain many exonic miRs (24). The exonic miRs are transcribed in pri-miRNAs and include 5’-cap and 3’-polyA. A vivid example of this group is miR-155 derived from the third exon of BIC transcript; namely, mlncRNAs. Natural functional SNPs in loop region and miR-155* change the second structure of miR-155 in humans (36). Although the effects of these SNPs have been identified on mature miR expression and immunological response in humans, their relation to cancer has not been studied until now. Also, information on studies conducted on exonic miRs and their SNPs related to cancer susceptibility is demonstrated in Table 2 (32, 37, 38).

SNPs in intergenic miRNA

The genomic distribution of 1523 human genes revealed that 57.6% of miRs are intergenic. Intergenic miRs are structurally and functionally similar to intronic miRs and have independent transcriptional regulatory elements, such as promoters and terminators. Also, MIR-125a, as an example of intergenic miR (39), contains rs12975333 in the seed region suppresses pri-miRNA processing to pre-miP-125a (40). The list of other instances of intergenic miRs and their studied SNPs is provided in Table 2 (41-44). Generally, these findings imply the changes in primary transcripts, hairpin-shaped precursors (pre-miRs), or mature miRs (with various origins), which may influence the miRNA properties and increase the risk of carcinogenesis. However, more research in future are needed to approve these findings.

Effect of SNPs on miRNAs’ regulatory elements in tumors

In addition to the direct effects of SNPs on various sequences of miRs, the SNPs can indirectly affect the regulatory elements involved in a miRs transcription. More than 90% of disease-related SNPs are located in noncoding regions, such as 5’UTRs, which contain important regulatory factors, e.g., promoters and enhancer or components involved in a translation (12). Noncoding SNPs, situated in the regulatory sites of genome include transcription factors, binding sites, and slice sites, which lead to genes misregulation at transcriptional or posttranscriptional level. There are almost more than 20 000 SNPs in human promoters which can moderate the overall level of pri-miRNAs (6). Taken together, variations in Cis or Trans regulatory elements change the miR host genes expression, and subsequently the miRs regulations are embedded in the host gene (45). Table 3 demonstrates some examples of SNP in regulatory elements related to change in transcription factors, binding tendency, and promoter activity (46-49). All these reports confirmed that SNPs in miRs regulatory regions are engaged in miRs processing and finally predisposition to abnormality.

Table 3. Effect of SNP in regulatory element of miRNAs on cancers .

miRNA Location of miRs SNP Location of SNP Cancer type Reference
miR-148/152 cluster Intron of coding region rs4719839 Promoter
~2966bp upper
pre-miR
Gastric (49)
miR-30a Intron of coding region rs763354 Enhancer NSCLC (46)
miR-122 Exon of ncRNA transcript rs17669 T/C
rs4309483 C>A
upstream regulatory region HCC (47)
miR-143/145 Exon of ncRNA transcript rs41291957 rs353292 rs353293
rs4705341
Promoter Colorectal (48)
miR-200b/200a/429 cluster Intergenic rs9660710 Promoter Enhancer NSCLC (46)

SNPs in coding regions of miRNA’s targets and host genes

The gene coding sequences are between 3’/5’UTRs regions. Coding SNPs only come about in the exonic regions. There are 2 types of coding SNPs: synonymous (sSNPs) and nonsynonymous (nsSNPs). Missense and nonsense are 2 subgroups of nsSNPs. Also, sSNPs can directly affect the translation kinetics and alter the folding pattern and the covalent modification of coded proteins. Also, sSNPs could lead to variation in translation regulation by affecting the mRNA-miRs interaction (50). However, nsSNPs as the most recognized genomic variant, alter the structure of the proteins through amino acid changes and contribute to the molecular function diversity in populations (51).

Effect of coding SNPs on miRNAs’ target genes in malignancies

There are about 40% to 60% of miRs binding sites in the coding region of genes (50). miRs binding site on the CDS is related to targets’ posttranscriptional regulation and are more effective in translation inhibition . In addition, the synergistic action of miRs-target site in CDS are confirmed in contributing to the recognition of seeds in 3’UTR or in elevating miRNA-mRNA interactions (52). Both SNPs (sSNP and nsSNP) in the coding regions occur frequently and alter the miR regulation (50). A number of SNPs on CDS in target genes were found to create new miR-matching sites (15, 53) or conversely disrupt the binding site (17, 54) (Table 4). As an illustration, nsSNP rs41427445 in CDS of MMP9 create the desired matching in miR-671-3p and miR-657 binding sites and reduced the protein secretion. Also, the missense SNP changes the N38S amino acid and removes the N-glycosylation site (55).

Table 4. Effect of coding SNP on cancers .
miRNA SNP Location of SNP Effect of SNP Cancer type Reference
mir-196 sSNP (c.313C>T) Coding region of miR-target gene:(IRGM) Destroying the miR-196 binding Crohns (54)
miR-146a/miR-146b sSNP
(2607G C) rs3733542
Exon of KIT
miR-target gene
Changing miR-146a/b binding site Thyroid (17)
miR-638 sSNP
rs799917 C/T
Exon of BRCA1
miR-target gene
More interaction between
BRCA1/miR-638
Breast

Gastric
(15)

(53)
miR-671-3p
miR-657
nsSNP
rs41427445/N38S
Exon of MMP-9
miR-target gene
Create miR-binding site - (55)
miR-34a rs72631823 G>A Coding region of
pre-miR-34a
miR-34a down-regulation osteosarcoma (56)
miR-148b nsSNP(missense)
rs11170877 A>G
Exon of COPZ1
miR-host gene
changing methionine to Val Gastric (49)

The effect of coding-SNPs in miRNAs’ host genes on cancers

SNPs in the coding regions of miRs may alter the expression and maturation of miRs and lead to abnormalities (50). Some examples of SNPs on the CDS in the host genes are presented in Table 4 (49, 56). As a result, coding SNPs in miR’s host genes and target genes may alter the processing and binding site on miR-target genes, respectively, and have vital effects on miRs function.

SNPs in miRNAs processing genes

As mentioned earlier, if variants exist in miR-biogenesis genes and genes related to silencing-machinery (AGO family and GEMIN proteins), they can alter the overall silencing efficiency (3). Some of SNPs in miRNAs processing genes are listed in Table 5 (28, 30, 57-60). According to the recent reports, the miR-biogenesis-degradation may interfere with the miR-maturation or even mRNA stability and protein expression due to the SNPs and may have a profound impact on cancer risk.

Table 5. Effect of SNP in miR- processing genes on cancers .

Gene SNP Location of SNP Type of SNP Cancer type Reference
GEMIN4 rs7813
rs3744741
Cys1033Arg
Gln684Arg
nsSNP
nsSNP
ESCC
Oral
(30)
(28)
TRBP rs784567 Promoter non-coding Larynx (59)
XPO5 rs11077 3'UTR non-coding Thyroid (60)
Dicer
rs3742330
rs13078, rs3742330
3'UTR
3'UTR
non-coding
non-coding
OPL
Larynx
(28)
(59)
Drosha rs640831 promoter non-coding Lung (58)
RAN rs14035 3'UTR non-coding Oral (57)

Conclusion

According to numerous studies, noncoding RNAs act as the main regulators of switching on and silencing the genes in cells, and the gene misexpression is one of the main pillars of the disease-making mechanisms. The emergence of miRs as one of the various noncoding RNAs and their widespread and critical interference in various cell and molecular parts have been considered as an amazing selection of nature in multicellular life. Here, 2 distinct classes of miRs have been reviewed: miRs resulting from intron overlapping with other transcripts and miRs, which are coded from exon transcripts. The new genomic sources of miRs, including transposable elements, pseudogenes, genome duplication, Denovo, and the antisense miRs loci , exhibit the miRs biosynthesis and maturation process and have many unknown dimensions. Despite all the advances made in identifying the biogenesis pathway and activity of miRs, more research is needed. Determining the exact origin of miRs (exon, intron, and intergenic), with respect to specific cell and tissue function of miRs, contributes to recognizing the precise cellular pathways and effective therapeutic interventions with tumor tissues and cells.

SNPs are present in a variety of genomic sequences that are related to miRs directly or indirectly and have a high capability of interfering with the miRs biological activity and controlling various cellular pathways. The phenotype of the cancers occurs during the deregulation of several genes and unusual cell divisions. Since miRs have remarkable effects on cellular processes, their misregulation due to mutation, polymorphism, etc., similar to coding protein genes, will influence the cells pathogenesis pathway. A large number of case-control studies were investigated in this review, most of which indicated the involvement of genetic SNPs in altering the miR expression levels and the miR biogenesis process genes, miR activity, and cancer susceptibility. The fundamental step in the study of association of miRs and tumorigenesis (early stages to metastasis) is identifying the SNPs related to miRs and its involvement in abnormalities. Here, it was aimed to obtain in-depth understanding of how the SNPs work in forming the cellular pathology and recognizing the miRs-controlled pathways. Any change in cancers requires designing a more complex experiments and more precise methods for early diagnosis and even therapeutic purposes. In addition to participating in tumorigenesis through sequential and structural changes, miR polymorphisms act as a double sword in pathogenesis and cancers. Subsequently, miR level deregulation will interfere with the target gene-binding. Based on studies conducted in the field of miR pharmacogenomics, the genetic heredity of miR-SNPs in each person impresses the body’s therapeutic response to drugs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Cite this article as: SiamiGorji S, Jorjani I, Tahamtan A, Moradi A. Effects of microRNAs polymorphism in cancer progression. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 (10 Feb);34:3. https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.3

References

  • 1.Barrett LW, Fletcher S, Wilton SD. Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression by the untranslated gene regions and other non-coding elements . Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012 Apr 27;69:3613–3634. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0990-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Apr;6(4):259–69. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Slaby O, Bienertova-Vasku J, Svoboda M, Vyzula R. Genetic polymorphisms and microRNAs: new direction in molecular epidemiology of solid cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Jan;16(1):8–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01359.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Jun;10(6):389–402. doi: 10.1038/nrc2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dalmay T, Edwards DR. MicroRNAs and the hallmarks of cancer. Oncogene. 2006 Oct 9;25(46):6170–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hogg DR, Harries LW. Human genetic variation and its effect on miRNA biogenesis, activity and function. Biochem Soc Trans. 2014 Aug;42(4):1184–9. doi: 10.1042/BST20140055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Czubak K LM, Klonowska K, Roszkowski K, Kowalewski J, Figlerowicz M. et al. High copy number variation of cancer-related microRNA genes and frequent amplification of DICER1 and DROSHA in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2015 June 22;6(27):23399–416. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kunej T, Godnic I, Ferdin J, Horvat S, Dovc P, Calin GA. Epigenetic regulation of microRNAs in cancer: an integrated review of literature. Mutat Res. 2011 Dec 1;717(1-2):77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merritt WM, Lin YG, Han LY, Kamat AA, Spannuth WA, Schmandt R. et al. Dicer, Drosha, and Outcomes in Patients with Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 18;359(25):2641–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Suzuki HI, Katsura A, Matsuyama H, Miyazono K. MicroRNA regulons in tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2015 Jun 11;34(24):3085–94. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tak YG, Farnham PJ. Making sense of GWAS: using epigenomics and genome engineering to understand the functional relevance of SNPs in non-coding regions of the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8(57):1–18. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0050-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hrdlickova B, Coutinho de Almeida R, Borek Z, Withoff S. Genetic variation in the non-coding genome: Involvement of micro-RNAs and long non-coding RNAs in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Mar 22;1842(10):1910–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gong J, Tong Y, Zhang HM, Wang K, Hu T, Shan G. et al. Genome-wide identification of SNPs in microRNA genes and the SNP effects on microRNA target binding and biogenesis. Hum Mutat. 2012 Nov 1;33(1):254–63. doi: 10.1002/humu.21641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH. Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3300–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611347104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nicoloso MS, Sun H, Spizzo R, Kim H, Wickramasinghe P, Shimizu M. et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 1;70(7):2789–98. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.El Hajj P, Gilot D, Migault M, Theunis A, van Kempen LC, Sales F. et al. SNPs at miR-155 binding sites of TYRP1 explain discrepancy between mRNA and protein and refine TYRP1 prognostic value in melanoma. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):91–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.He H, Jazdzewski K, Li W, Liyanarachchi S, Nagy R, Volinia S. et al. The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 27;102(52):19075–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509603102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Naccarati A, Pardini B, Stefano L, Landi D, Slyskova J, Novotny J. et al. Polymorphisms in miRNA-binding sites of nucleotide excision repair genes and colorectal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2012 May 11;33(7):1346–51. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dzikiewicz-Krawczyk A, Macieja A, Mały E, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Mosor M, Fichna M. et al. Polymorphisms in microRNA target sites modulate risk of lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias and affect microRNA binding. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7(43):1–13. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ratner E, Lu L, Boeke M, Barnett R, Nallur S, Chin LJ. et al. A KRAS-variant in ovarian cancer acts as a genetic marker of cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2010 Aug 15;70(16):6509–15. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tchatchou S, Jung A, Hemminki K, Sutter C, Wappenschmidt B, Bugert P. et al. A variant affecting a putative miRNA target site in estrogen receptor (ESR) 1 is associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Carcinogenesis. 2009 Jan;30(1):59–64. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim VN, Han J, Siomi MC. Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Feb;10(2):126–39. doi: 10.1038/nrm2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pipan V, Zorc M, Kunej T. MicroRNA Polymorphisms in Cancer: A Literature Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2015 Sep 9;7(3):1806–14. doi: 10.3390/cancers7030863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodriguez A GJS, Ashurst J, Bradley A. Identification of Mammalian microRNA Host Genes and Transcription Units . Genome Res. 2004 Sep;14:1902–10. doi: 10.1101/gr.2722704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hu Z, Shu Y, Chen Y, Chen J, Dong J, Liu Y. et al. Genetic polymorphisms in the precursor MicroRNA flanking region and non-small cell lung cancer survival. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar 1;183(5):641–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0717OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mu YP, Su XL. Polymorphism in pre-miR-30c contributes to gastric cancer risk in a Chinese population. Med Oncol. 2012 Sep;29(3):1723–32. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hashemi M, Moradi N, Ziaee SA, Narouie B, Soltani MH, Rezaei M. et al. Association between single nucleotide polymorphism in miR-499, miR-196a2, miR-146a and miR-149 and prostate cancer risk in a sample of Iranian population. J Adv Res. 2016 May;7(3):491–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2016.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Clague J, Lippman SM, Yang H, Hildebrandt MA, Ye Y, Lee JJ. et al. Genetic variation in MicroRNA genes and risk of oral premalignant lesions. Mol Carcinog. 2010 Feb;49(2):183–9. doi: 10.1002/mc.20588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fu A, Hoffman AE, Liu R, Jacobs DI, Zheng T, Zhu Y. Targetome profiling and functional genetics implicate miR-618 in lymphomagenesis. Epigenetics. 2014 May;9(5):730–7. doi: 10.4161/epi.27996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang PW, Huang YC, Hsieh CY, Hua KT, Huang YT, Chiang TH. et al. Association of miRNA-related Genetic Polymorphisms and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr 26;21(S4):601–9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3709-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Iwai N, Naraba H. Polymorphisms in human pre-miRNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Jun 17;331(4):1439–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kminkova J, Mraz M, Zaprazna K, Navrkalova V, Tichy B, Plevova K. et al. Identification of novel sequence variations in microRNAs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Carcinogenesis. 2014 May;35(5):992–1002. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu Q, Dong Q, He C, Liu W, Sun L, Liu J. et al. A new polymorphism biomarker rs629367 associated with increased risk and poor survival of gastric cancer in chinese by up-regulated miRNA-let-7a expression. PLoS ONE. 2014 Apr 23;9(4):e95249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tomsic J FR, Liyanarachchi S, Genutis L, Wang Y, Li W. et al. Variants in microRNA genes in familial papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 23;8(4):6475–82. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang R, Zhang J, Jiang W, Ma Y, Li W, Jin B. et al. Association between a variant in microRNA-646 and the susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in a large-scale population. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Aug 7;2014:312704. doi: 10.1155/2014/312704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li C, He H, Liu A, Liu H, Huang H, Zhao C. et al. Natural Functional SNPs in miR-155 Alter Its Expression Level, Blood Cell Counts, and Immune Responses. Front Immunol. 2016 Agu 2;7:295. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lian H, Wang L, Zhang J. Increased risk of breast cancer associated with CC genotype of Has-miR-146a Rs2910164 polymorphism in Europeans. PLoS ONE. 2012 Feb 20;7(2):e31615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miao L, Wang L, Yuan H, Hang D, Zhu L, Du J. et al. MicroRNA-101 polymorphisms and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. Tumour Biol. 2016 Oct 22;37(3):4169–74. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4249-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saini HK, Enright AJ, Griffiths-Jones S. Annotation of mammalian primary microRNAs. BMC Genomics. 2008 Nov 27;9(1):564. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Duan R, Pak C, Jin P. Single nucleotide polymorphism associated with mature miR-125a alters the processing of pri-miRNA. Hum Mol Genet. 2007 May 1;16(9):1124–31. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kwak MS, Lee DH, Cho Y, Cho EJ, Lee JH, Yu SJ. et al. Association of polymorphism in pri-microRNAs-371-372-373 with the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B virus infected patients. PLoS ONE. 2012 Jul 27;7(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoffman AE, Zheng T, Yi C, Leaderer D, Weidhaas J, Slack F. et al. microRNA miR-196a-2 and breast cancer: a genetic and epigenetic association study and functional analysis. Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;69(14):5970–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lehmann TP, Korski K, Ibbs M, Zawierucha P, Grodecka-Gazdecka S, Jagodzinski PP. rs12976445 variant in the pri-miR-125a correlates with a lower level of hsa-miR-125a and ERBB2 overexpression in breast cancer patients. Oncol Lett. 2013 Feb;5(2):569–73. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li XW, Wang J, Xu A, Huang J, Meng L, Huang R. et al. The microRNA-1268a rs28599926 polymorphism modified diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma risk and prognosis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016 Nov 30;9(11):21615–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Muinos-Gimeno M, Montfort M, Bayes M, Estivill X, Espinosa-Parrilla Y. Design and evaluation of a panel of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNA genomic regions for association studies in human disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Feb;18(2):218–26. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xie K, Wang C, Qin N, Yang J, Zhu M, Dai J. et al. Genetic variants in regulatory regions of microRNAs are associated with lung cancer risk. Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 25;7(30):47966–74. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thakral S, Ghoshal K. miR-122 is a Unique Molecule with Great Potential in Diagnosis,Prognosis of Liver Disease, and Therapy Both as miRNA Mimic and Antimir. Curr Gene Ther. 2015;15(2):142–50. doi: 10.2174/1566523214666141224095610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li L, Pan X, Li Z, Bai P, Jin H, Wang T. et al. Association between polymorphisms in the promoter region of miR-143/145 and risk of colorectal cancer. Hum Immunol. 2013 Aug;74(8):993–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen X, Wang G, Lu X, Gao P, Song Y, Sun J. et al. Polymorphisms and haplotypes of the miR-148/152 family are associated with the risk and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer in a Northern Chinese population. Mutagenesis. 2014 Nov;29(6):401–7. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Y, Qiu C, Cui Q. A Large-Scale Analysis of the Relationship of Synonymous SNPs Changing MicroRNA Regulation with Functionality and Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Sep 30;16(10):23545–55. doi: 10.3390/ijms161023545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chasman D, Adam RM. Predicting the Functional Consequences of Non-synonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms: Structure-based Assessment of Amino Acid Variation. J Mol Biol. 2001 Mar 23;307:(683–706). doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fang Z, Rajewsky N. The Impact of miRNA Target Sites in Coding Sequences and in 3’UTRs. PLoS ONE. 2011 Mar 22;6(3):). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang K, Xu L, Pan L, Xu K, Li G. The functional BRCA1 rs799917 genetic polymorphism is associated with gastric cancer risk in a Chinese Han population. Tumor Biol. 2014 Sep 30;36(1):393–7. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2655-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brest P, Lapaquette P, Souidi M, Lebrigand K, Cesaro A, Vouret-Craviari V. et al. A synonymous variant in IRGM alters a binding site for miR-196 and causes deregulation of IRGM-dependent xenophagy in Crohn's disease. Nat Genet. 2011 Mar;43(3):242–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Duellman T, Warren C, Yang J. Single nucleotide polymorphism-specific regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 by multiple miRNAs targeting the coding exon. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Mar 13;42(9):5518–31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lv H, Pei J, Liu H, Wang H, Liu J. A polymorphism site in the premiR34a coding region reduces miR34a expression and promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation and migration. Mol Med Rep. 2014 Dec;10(6):2912–6. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roy R, De Sarkar N, Ghose S, Paul RR, Pal M, Bhattacharya C. et al. Genetic variations at microRNA and processing genes and risk of oral cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014 Apr;35(4):3409–14. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1450-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rotunno M, Zhao Y, Bergen AW, Koshiol J, Burdette L, Rubagotti M. et al. Inherited polymorphisms in the RNA-mediated interference machinery affect microRNA expression and lung cancer survival. Br J Cancer. 2010 Dec 7;103(12):1870–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Osuch-Wojcikiewicz E, Bruzgielewicz A, Niemczyk K, Sieniawska-Buccella O, Nowak A, Walczak A. et al. Association of Polymorphic Variants of miRNA Processing Genes with Larynx Cancer Risk in a Polish Population. Biomed Res Int. 2015 Oct 25;2015:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2015/298378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wen J, Gao Q, Wang N, Zhang W, Cao K, Zhang Q. et al. Association of microRNA-related gene XPO5 rs11077 polymorphism with susceptibility to thyroid cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017 Apr;96(14):e6351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran are provided here courtesy of Iran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES