To the Editor: We were very pleased to read Chen et al's commentary1 presenting practical methods for reducing the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the dermatologic setting. Health care teams around the world are working diligently to limit the spread of COVID-19 despite unprecedented challenges. In this letter, we provide additional strategies and a potential framework for maintaining successful patient care while limiting risks for faculty, residents, staff, and the community during the COVID-19 outbreak.
The first goal in the COVID-19 pandemic is to limit the spread of the virus. To prevent infection of an entire specialty group, departments should consider adopting a team-based practice model to limit cross-contamination. Each team consists of a ratio of providers based on the individual institution's workforce. For example, 1 team in our department consists of 1 attending physician, 2 resident physicians, 2 nurses or medical assistants, and 1 supportive staff member. Individuals are in the clinic only if their team is conducting in-person visits that day. They are not allowed to have in-person contact with members outside of their designated team. In the event that a team member is exposed to or tests positive for COVID-19, only individuals within their team are required to self-quarantine for 14 days and/or be subsequently tested. By using this approach, cross-contamination is limited; thus, the department can continue to operate and deliver in-person care despite COVID-19 exposure.
To continue effective patient care while limiting exposure, we have implemented a coded triaging system that allows us to prioritize and provide the appropriate care for each patient (Fig 1 and Table I ). A key step is to implement this model as early as possible in combination with teledermatology, as other practices have already suggested.2 , 3 As depicted in the diagram, patients with high acuity, such as individuals with concerning lesions and potentially life-threatening eruptions, have priority for in-person visits. Simultaneously, continuity of care for existing patients can be achieved through teledermatology. With this system, patients can continue long-term management while decreasing the risk of exposure.
Fig 1.
Color-coded scheme of triaging patient visits in dermatologic care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. MA, Medical assistant; RN, registered nurse. Created with Biorender.com.
Table I.
Visit types and associated visit categories
| Visit type | Visit categories |
|---|---|
| In-person visit | Blistering skin condition |
| Diffuse rash (BSA >80%); acute onset within 1-2 weeks | |
| Erythrodermic | |
| Mucosal involvement | |
| Rapidly enlarging non-healing lesion (including bleeding) that has been present for at least 4 weeks | |
| Painful lesion(s)/rash | |
| Patients with high number of skin cancers and diffuse actinic damage | |
| Any rash in immunocompromised patient or patient on chemotherapy that requires a skin biopsy | |
| Concerning lesion for melanoma diagnosis or other high-risk skin cancer | |
| Telemedicine | Condition worsening; need to make changes to therapeutic plan |
| < 3-month follow-up scheduled at last visit | |
| Lesion for monitoring in patient with history of melanoma or high-risk skin cancer | |
| New lesion of concern present for > 4 weeks | |
| Acne vulgaris and rosacea (active disease) | |
| New patient visit with chief complaint other than specified “in-person visit” category | |
| Hidradenitis suppurativa (active) | |
| Cyst (inflamed, painful) | |
| Provider phone call | Follow-up on chronic rashes (psoriasis, etc.) |
| Isotretinoin monthly discussion (RN/MA visit for urine in female patients) | |
| High-risk medication monitoring (including biologics and immunomodulators) | |
| Diagnosis of melanoma or other high-risk skin cancer in the last year | |
| Hidradenitis suppurativa (controlled) | |
| RN/MA calls | Path results information |
| Laboratory tests – notification of normal/abnormal results | |
| RN/MA visit | Isotretinoin refill (female urine test)∗ |
| Nonurgent/reschedule | 6-12 month follow-up without concerning lesions |
| Lesion for monitoring in patient with no personal or family history of melanoma. Lesion stable per patient. | |
| Lesion of concern present < 4 weeks | |
| Acne vulgaris and rosacea (controlled) | |
| Seborrheic dermatitis | |
| Skin tag/seborrheic keratoses | |
| Lipoma/cyst | |
| Hair loss | |
| Irritating lesion | |
| Patch testing | |
| Cyst (not inflamed) |
BSA, Body surface area; MA, medical assistant; RN, registered nurse.
With associated provider phone call.
Because in-patient visits are unavoidable, Chen et al1 detailed additional precautions that can be implemented to reduce COVID-19 spread. Recommendations included allowing only 1 accompanying person per patient, mask usage and temperature reading for people entering both inpatient and outpatient buildings, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by team members working with patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. We agree with these recommendations, although PPE has been in short supply, restricting successful implementation. Alternatively, sterilization of PPE equipment can help mitigate this limitation.
The COVID-19 outbreak has been challenging, and the medical community has united together to halt the spread. As the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve, we hope to develop and implement procedures that limit the spread of COVID-19 while ensuring that optimal patient care is achieved in dermatology. Once again, we thank Chen et al1 for their contribution to improving patient care and safety during this unprecedented time.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr Sancy Leachman and Dr Julie Bauman for their support and inspiration during the design and implementation of the proposed clinical model.
Footnotes
Funding sources: None.
Disclosure: Dr Shi is a stock shareholder of Learn Health and has served as an advisory board member and/or investigator and/or has received research funding from Sanofi Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, SUN Pharma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Menlo Therapeutics, Burt’s Bees, GpSkin, Altus Labs, and Skin Actives Scientific; there were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript. Dr Curiel-Lewandrowski has served as an advisory board member and/or investigator and/or has received research funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Helsinn, and Novartis; there were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript. Ms Price and Dr Thiede have no conflicts of interest to declare.
IRB approval status: Not applicable.
Reprints not available from the authors.
References
- 1.Chen Y., Pradhan S., Xue S. What are we doing in the dermatology outpatient department amidst the raging of the 2019 novel coronavirus? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(4):1034. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hollander J.E., Carr B.G. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19 [Epub ahead of print] N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539. Accessed March 26, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith A.C., Thomas E., Snoswell C.L., et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) J Telemed Telecare. 2020 doi: 10.1177/1357633X20916567. Accessed March 26, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

