Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0231265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231265

Characterization of a novel compound that promotes myogenesis via Akt and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in mouse C2C12 cells

Manami Kodaka 1,#, Fengju Mao 1,#, Kyoko Arimoto-Matsuzaki 1,*, Masami Kitamura 1,2, Xiaoyin Xu 1,3, Zeyu Yang 1,4, Kentaro Nakagawa 1, Junichi Maruyama 1, Kana Ishii 5, Chihiro Akazawa 5, Takuya Oyaizu 6,7, Naoki Yamamoto 6,7, Mari Ishigami-Yuasa 8, Nozomi Tsuemoto 9, Shigeru Ito 9, Hiroyuki Kagechika 8,9, Hiroshi Nishina 10, Yutaka Hata 1,11,*
Editor: Arun Rishi12
PMCID: PMC7141682  PMID: 32267872

Abstract

Transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) plays versatile roles in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. TAZ activity changes in response to the cellular environment such as mechanic and nutritional stimuli, osmolarity, and hypoxia. To understand the physiological roles of TAZ, chemical compounds that activate TAZ in cells are useful as experimental reagents. Kaempferol, TM-25659, and ethacridine are reported as TAZ activators. However, as each TAZ activator has a distinct property in cellular functions, additional TAZ activators are awaiting. We screened for TAZ activators and previously reported IB008738 as a TAZ activator that promotes myogenesis in C2C12 cells. In this study, we have characterized IBS004735 that was obtained in the same screening. IBS004735 also promotes myogenesis in C2C12 cells, but is not similar to IBS008738 in the structure. IBS004735 activates TAZ via Akt and has no effect on TAZ phosphorylation, which is the well-described key modification to regulate TAZ activity. Thus, we introduce IBS004735 as a novel TAZ activator that regulates TAZ in a yet unidentified mechanism.

Introduction

Transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) shuttles between the cytoplasm and the nucleus [1]. TAZ interacts with various transcription factors inside the nucleus and regulates versatile genes. TAZ is phosphorylated by large tumor suppressor (LATS) kinases, the core kinases of the Hippo pathway. Phosphorylation generates 14-3-3-binding motif. Consequently, TAZ is segregated in the cytoplasm. Phosphorylation also triggers TAZ degradation. In this way, the tumor suppressor Hippo pathway negatively regulates TAZ [2]. In cancer cells, dysregulation of the Hippo pathway leads to hyperactivation of TAZ. Active TAZ cooperates with TEA-domain (TEAD) family members to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enhances drug resistance [3, 4]. TAZ cross-talks with WNT pathway and confers cancer stemness [5]. In mesenchymal stem cells, TAZ promotes myogenesis and osteogenesis, and inhibits adipogenesis [6]. TAZ is required for lung alveolar cell differentiation and heart development [711]. TAZ promotes bone formation and suppresses chondrogenesis [1215]. TAZ maintains testicular function in aged mice [16]. To study the physiological and pathophysiological roles of TAZ, loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches are frequently used in animals. Knockout animals are the most straight forward tools to reveal essential roles of TAZ. To evaluate the effect of TAZ hyperactivation, TAZ mutants, which lack LATS-phosphorylation site(s) and are constitutively active, are enforcedly expressed. Alternatively, the suppression of components of the Hippo pathway (for examples, mammalian Ste20-like kinases, salvador and Mobs), is adopted [1719]. Likewise, knockdown and knockout approaches and expression of TAZ active mutants are common strategies for the analysis at the cell level. However, these methods are not appropriate to study the relatively short-term or acute effect of TAZ inactivation or activation. To this end, reagents to inhibit and activate TAZ are essential. Verteporfin, although it was originally developed as a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy, is the best characterized inhibitor and is widely used as an experimental reagent [20]. On the other hand, several TAZ activators are reported. Kaempferol and TM-25659 promote osteogenesis in C3H10T1/2 and human adipose-derived stem cells and inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells [21, 22]. Ethacridine inhibits adipogenesis in C3H10T1/2 cells and induces thyroid follicular cell differentiation form human embryonic stem cells [23, 24]. IBS008738 facilitates myogenesis in C2C12 cells [25]. Although all these compounds are commercially available, TAZ activators are not yet fully established. Therefore, it is meaningful to provide a novel TAZ activator to researchers.

We previously performed a cell-based assay to screen for TAZ activators by using MCF10A cells expressing TAZ (MCF10A-TAZ) [25]. We cultured MCF10A-TAZ cells in the serum-free medium supplemented with insulin, epithelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in the ultra-low attachment plate. When large tumor suppressor kinase 1 and -2 (LATS1/2) are suppressed to activate TAZ, cells form spheres. LATS1/2 silencing has no effect in parent MCF10A cells without overexpressed TAZ, while TAZ silencing inhibits sphere formation in MCF10A-TAZ cells. It means that the sphere formation depends on the activity of TAZ. Therefore, we can regard the compounds that enable MCF10A-TAZ cells to form spheres as TAZ activators. We applied 18,459 small chemical compounds to MCF10A-TAZ cells and obtained 50 compounds that induced the sphere formation (S1A Fig and S2 Fig). These compounds also enhanced TAZ-TEAD reporter activity in HEK293FT cells (S1B Fig). We applied these compounds to mouse myoblast C2C12 cells and found 43 compounds that enhanced myogenesis (S1C Fig). Among them, four compounds (FKL01303, IBS000145, IBS004735, and IBS008738) strongly promoted myogenesis in mouse myoblast C2C12 cells (S1C Fig, arrows). FKL01303 is 1-[5-hydroxy-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylindol-3-yl]ethenone (Amendol). Amendol is reported to activate sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (SPR1) (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/658914). Therefore, FKL01303 may activate TAZ through SPR1 [26]. We focused on three remaining uncharacterized compounds. In the previous study, we characterized IBS008738 and reported it as a TAZ activato that promotes skeletal muscle repair and prevents dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy [25]. In this study, we have focused on IBS004735, while the property of IBS000145 will be reported in future.

Results

IBS004735 enhances protein expressions of myogenic differentiation and its effect depends on TAZ

IBS004735 is structurally distinct from other TAZ activators (Fig 1A). IBS004735 promoted myofusion (Fig 1B) and enhanced the expression of myosin heavy chain (MHC) in C2C12 cells (Fig 1C). The immunoblottings demonstrated the enhanced expression of MHC and myogenin at 24, 48, and 72 h (Fig 1D). MyoD expression and TAZ expression were also slightly enhanced. TAZ knockdown abolished the effect of IBS004735 on MHC expression, supporting that the myogenesis-promoting activity depends on TAZ (Fig 1E). We also confirmed that IBS004735 had no effect on the proliferation of C2C12 cells under the growing condition (Fig 1F).

Fig 1. The effect of IBS004735 on myogenesis and myofusion in mouse C2C12 cells.

Fig 1

(A) Chemical structure of IBS004735. (B), (C), and (D) C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium with either control DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735. In (B), myofusion was promoted by IBS004735. Scale bar, 100 μ m. Myofusion index was calculated as described in Methods. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ****, p<0.0001. In (C), the cells were immunostained with anti-myosin heavy chain (MHC) antibody and the signals were measured by ImageJ. ***, p<0.001. In (D), the whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. 50 μg of total protein is charged in each lane and the immunoblotting with anti-α-tubulin antibody is shown as a loading control. Signals of TAZ and α-tubulin were quantified by ImageJ. Numbers indicate relative TAZ signals normalized by α-tubulin signals. The value at 0 h was set at 1.0 (E) C2C12 cells were transfected with either control siRNA (si CONT) or TAZ siRNA (si TAZ). 24 h later, the cells were replated and cultured in differentiation medium for 72 h with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735. MHC was immunostained (green). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-TAZ and anti-α-tubulin antibodies to show that TAZ was indeed suppressed. (F) C2C12 cells were plated at 1,000 cells/well in a 96-well plate and cultured in the growing medium with various doses of IBS004735. MTT assay was performed at the indicated time points.

IBS004735 enhances mRNAs of myogenic markers

In quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), the gene transcriptions of myogenin (Myog) and MyoD (Myod1) at 24 h under the differentiation condition were enhanced in IBS004735-treated cells (Fig 2A). Although TAZ protein expression was enhanced at 48 and 72 h (Fig 1D), TAZ mRNA (Wwtr1) did not increase at 24 h and rather decreased at 72 h, suggesting that TAZ expression was changed at the protein level. No significant increase was observed at 24 h in mRNAs of connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf) and cyclin D1(Ccnd1), which are regarded as TEAD target genes in epithelial cells. After C2C12 cells were cultured for 72 h, Myog mRNA was still higher in IBS004735-treated cells, while the difference was lost for Myod1. At 72 h, Ctgf expression was enhanced in IBS004735-treated cells.

Fig 2. The effect of IBS004735 on the expression of myogenic marker genes.

Fig 2

(A) qRT-PCR analysis of indicated genes. After C2C12 cells were transferred from growth medium to differentiation medium, mRNAs were collected at the indicated time points and qRT-PCRs were performed. IBS004735 enhanced the expression of myogenin (Myog) and MyoD (Myod1) at 24 h. Connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf) expression was enhanced at 72 h by IBS004735. Ccnd1 expression was not affected. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ns, not significant; **, p<0.01; and ***, p<0.001. (B) C2C12 cells were transfected pGL3 Myo-184- (for MyoD), 8xGT-IIC-d51LucII (for TEAD), 9xCAGA-MLP (for SMAD), and p(PRS-1/-4)x3 (for Pax3) luciferase reporters alone (CONT) or with TAZ (TAZ WT). pCMV alkaline phosphatase was used as a control. The cells were transferred to differentiation medium 24 h later and cultured for another 18 h with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735. MyoD-, TEAD-, and Pax3- reporter activities were enhanced by TAZ. IBS004735 further enhanced MyoD- and TEAD-reporters, but had no effect on Pax3- or SMAD-reporter. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ns, not significant; *, p<0.05; and ***, p<0.001. (C) C2C12 cells that were cultured with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735 for 24 h in differentiation medium. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed with anti-MyoD, anti-TEAD, and anti-Pax3 antibodies. The co-precipitated promoters of Myog, Ctgf, and Myf5 were detected by PCR. Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow beads were used as a control (Mock ChIP). IBS004735 promoted the association of MyoD to the myogenin promoter. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ns, not significant; and ****, p<0.0001.

IBS004735 enhances MyoD-responsive myogenin promoter reporter in C2C12 cells

We tested whether and how IBS004735 affects the reporter activities mediated by various TAZ-interacting transcription factors in C2C12 cells. We exogenously expressed each reporter and TAZ in C2C12 cells and treated with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735. TAZ overexpression enhanced the activities of MyoD-, TEAD-, and Pax3-reporters (Fig 2B, the first and the third columns). TAZ also showed the tendency to augment SMAD-reporter. IBS004735 further enhanced MyoD- and TEAD-reporters in C2C12 cells (Fig 2B, the third and fourth columns). In this regard, IBS004735 is different from IBS008738, which does not affect TEAD-reporter in C2C12 cells. IBS004735 did not enhance the effect of TAZ on Pax3- or SMAD- reporter. In Fig 2A, IBS004735 did not increase Ctgf mRNA at 24 h, but in Fig 2B, it enhanced TEAD-reporter after 18 h-treatment. These results are apparently inconsistent. For the reporter assay, we used the luciferase reporter driven by eight repeats of the TEAD-responsive sequence. We suspect that this artificial construct may respond to TEAD more strongly than the native Ctgf promoter.

IBS004735 increases MyoD association with the myogenin promoter

MyoD, TEAD4, and Pax3 were immunoprecipitated from differentiated C2C12 cells treated with control DMSO or IBS004735 and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed. Consistent with the reporter assays, IBS004735 increased MyoD binding to Myog promoter, but had no effect on Pax3 binding to Myf5 promoter (Fig 2C). The association of TEAD4 with Ctgf promoter was not affected. This result is consistent with that of qRT-PCR (Fig 2A), but not with that of the reporter assay (Fig 2B). We consider that this discrepancy can also be explained by the difference between the native Ctgf promoter and the artificial promoter.

IBS004735 does not affect the subcellular localization of TAZ and the phosphorylation at Serine 89

In the canonical Hippo pathway, TAZ is phosphorylated by LATS kinases and negatively regulated [27]. The phosphorylated TAZ is segregated in the cytoplasm and undergoes degradation, while the unphosphorylated TAZ is accumulated in the nucleus and regulates gene transcription. We examined whether IBS004735 increases the unphosphorylated nuclear TAZ in C2C12 cells. In the subcellular fractionation, TAZ was distributed in the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions in C2C12 cells, and IBS004735 did not change the distribution of TAZ (Fig 3A). TAZ is phosphorylated by LATS kinases at four sites. Among them Serine 89 is the most important, because the phosphorylation at this site generates the 14-3-3-binding site. We analyzed the whole cell lysates of C2C12 cells treated with IB004735 on a Phos-tag gel (Fig 3B). The top band was detected with both anti-TAZ and anti-phospho-Serine 89 (p-TAZ) antibodies (Fig 3B, an arrow), while the lower two bands were not detected with anti-phospho-Serine 89 antibody (Fig 3B, arrowheads). Ethacridine, which is known to promote dephosphorylation of TAZ, increased not only the expression of whole TAZ but also that of unphosphorylated TAZ (Fig 3B, a white arrowhead) [23]. In contrast, IBS004735 did not increase unphosphorylated TAZ expression. IBS004735 is also different from IBS008738, which increases unphosphorylated TAZ [25]. The coimmunoprecipitation experiment demonstrated that IBS004735 did not augment the interaction between TAZ and TEAD4 in HEK293FT cells (Fig 3C). These findings suggest that the activation of TAZ by IBS004735 is not mediated by the suppression of the canonical Hippo pathway.

Fig 3. The effect of IBS004735 on the subcellular localization and phosphorylation of TAZ and on the interaction between TAZ and TEAD4.

Fig 3

C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium for 24 h and harvested. In (A), the subcellular fractionation was performed. The comparable amounts of the whole cell lysates (W), the nuclear fraction (N), and the cytoplasmic fraction (C) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. α-Tubulin and lamin B were used as the cytoplasmic marker and the nuclear marker, respectively. TAZ was detected in the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions and IBS004735 did not change the distribution. TAZ migrated more slowly in the cytoplasmic fraction than in the nuclear fraction, which suggests that the cytoplasmic TAZ is phosphorylated. In the right, the cells were immunostained by anti-TAZ antibody. After differentiation, TAZ distribution was heterogenous in C2C12 cells. In some cells, TAZ was accumulated in the nuclei (arrowheads). Scale bar, 100 μm. In (B), HEK293FT cells were transfected with pCIneoGFP-TAZ. The whole cell lysates were run on Phos-tag gels and immunoblotted with anti-TAZ (left, TAZ) and anti-phospho-Serine 89 antibody (right, p-TAZ). The top bands were detected with both antibodies (an arrow), while the lower two bands were detected with only anti-TAZ antibody (arrowheads). As TAZ has multiple phosphorylation sites, the middle band may correspond to TAZ that is phosphorylated at other sites than Serine 89. The lysates of the cells treated by 10 μM ethacridine were used as a control. Unphosphorylated TAZ (a white arrowhead) was remarkably increased by ethacridine. (C) HEK293FT cells were transfected with pCIneoLuc-TEAD4 and pCIneoFH-TAZ. 24 h later, the cells were treated with either DMSO (a white bar) or 10 μM IBS004735 (a gray bar) for 24 h. The immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-DYKDDDDK-tag beads. The luciferase activity attached to the beads were measured.

IBS004735 activates Akt-mTOR-S6K pathway and stimulates protein synthesis in C2C12 cells

We attempted to clarify the mechanism, by which IBS004735 activates TAZ. Insulin-like growth factor 1-Akt axis plays an important role in the regulation of protein synthesis and protein degradation in skeletal muscles. We therefore examined the effect of IBS004735 on Akt signaling pathway. IBS004735 stimulated Akt phosphorylation (Fig 4A). mTOR and S6K were also activated. We next evaluated the effect of IBS004735 on protein synthesis at different time points in the SUnSET experiment. Consistent with the up-regulation of Akt-mTOR-S6K axis, the incorporation of puromycin was higher in IBS004735-treated cells at 0 h and 24 h, although the difference was less remarkable at 48 and 72 h (Fig 4B). The inhibition of Akt by Akti-1/2 or Akt1/2 silencing attenuated the effect of IBS004735 (Fig 4C and 4D). Likewise, the inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin significantly compromised the effect of IBS004735 (Fig 4E). These findings indicate that IBS004735 activates Akt-mTOR-S6K pathway and stimulates protein synthesis in C2C12 cells, especially at the early differentiation phase. Interestingly, in the TAZ-negative background, Akt phosphorylation was still enhanced by IBS004735 at 24 h (Fig 4F, si TAZ, arrowheads), but the IBS004735-mediated enhancement was reduced at 48 h (Fig 4F, si TAZ, arrows). These findings imply that IBS004735 initially activates TAZ via Akt signaling, and that TAZ subsequently activates Akt.

Fig 4. IBS004735 activates Akt-mTOR-S6K axis.

Fig 4

(A) C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735 for the indicated periods of time. The cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. IBS004735 increased phosphorylation of Akt, mTOR, and S6K at indicated sites. Signals were quantified by ImageJ. Numbers indicate relative intensities of phospho-Akt, -mTOR, and -S6K signals normalized by total-Akt, -mTOR, and -S6K signals. (B) C2C12 cells were cultured under the differentiation condition with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735 for the indicated periods of time. 1 μM puromycin was added to the medium. 30 min later, the cells were harvested and the incorporated puromycin was detected with anti-puromycin antibody. At 0 h and 24 h, IBS004735 enhanced puromycin incorporation. At 48 h and 72 h, the effect of IBS004735 was less remarkable. Signals were quantified by ImageJ. Numbers indicate relative intensities of signals in IBS004735-treated cells normalized signals in control cells at each time point. (C), (D), and (E) C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium containing the indicated reagents (DMSO, 1 μM Akti-1/2, 1 nM rapamycin, and 10 μM IBS004735). The cells were immunostained with anti-MHC antibody. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342. Myofusion index was calculated. Data are means and standard errors of the means. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; and ****, p<0.0001. In (D), first, Akt1/2 were knocked down by siRNAs against mouse Akt1/2. 24 h later, the cells were transferred to the differentiation medium with or without 10 μM IBS004735. (F) C2C12 cells were transfected with control siRNA (si CONT) or TAZ siRNA (si TAZ) and then cultured under the differentiation condition with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735. Although TAZ knockdown remarkably suppressed TAZ expression in DMSO-treated cells, TAZ was slightly expressed with IBS004735 treatment. TAZ depletion did not change IBS004735-induced enhancement of phospho-Akt at 24 h (arrowheads) but attenuated it at 48 h (arrows). In (C) and (D), number indicate the relative ratios of p-Akt signals normalized by Akt signals.

IBS004735 activates Akt through tyrosine kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)

The next obvious question is the mechanism, by which IBS004735 activates Akt-mTOR-S6K pathway. When C2C12 cells were pre-treated with PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, the activation of Akt was abolished and the effect of IBS004735 was significantly compromised (Fig 5A). Genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, also abolished the effect of IBS004735 (Fig 5B). These findings suggest that a certain tyrosine kinase, which is coupled with PI3K, may be involved in the function of IBS004735.

Fig 5. IBS004735 initially activates Akt independently of TAZ and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor and PI3K inhibitors abolish the effect of IBS004735.

Fig 5

C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium containing indicated reagents. (DMSO, 1 μM LY294002 in (A), 20 μM genistein in (B), and 10 μM IBS004735). The cells were immunostained with anti-MHC antibody. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342. Myofusion index was calculated. Data are means and standard errors of the means. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; and ****, p<0.0001. The immunoblottings demonstrate that LY294002 and genistein attenuated the IBS004735-mediated enhancement of Akt phosphorylation. The signals of p-Akt and Akt were quantified and the ratios between two signals were indicated.

IBS004735 blocks the inhibitory effect of tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) and myostatin

TNF-α and myostatin play important roles in muscle atrophy associated with cancer cachexia and various chronic diseases [28, 29]. IBS008738 antagonized the inhibitory effect of myostatin in C2C12 cells. We tested whether IBS004735 antagonizes TNF-αand myostatin. 10 ng/ml TNF-α and 100 ng/ml myostatin suppressed MHC expression and myofusion in C2C12 cells but 10 μM of IBS004735 partially but significantly recovered them (Fig 6A and 6B). We further examined whether and how IBS004735 affects the signals of TNF-α and myostatin. In the reporter assays using HEK293FT cells. TNF-α activated NFκB-reporter activity, while IBS004735 decreased it (Fig 6C). Likewise, IBS004735 attenuated myostatin-induced SMAD-reporter activity (Fig 6D).

Fig 6. The antagonistic effect of IBS004735 against TNF-α and myostatin and the effect on the expression of E3 ligases and autophagy-related proteins.

Fig 6

(A) and (B) C2C12 cells were cultured in differentiation medium containing various combinations of DMSO, 10 ng/ml TNF-α, 100 ng/ml myostatin (MSTN), and 10 μM IBS004735. 72 h later, the cells were immunostained with anti-MHC antibody and the nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342. TNF-α and myostatin reduced MHC expression and myofusion but IBS004735 partially recovered them. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ns, not significant; ****, p<0.0001. (C) and (D) NF-κB- and SMAD-reporter assays were performed in HEK293FT cells as described in Materials and Methods. TNF-α and myostatin activate the reporter activities, but IBS004735 attenuated them. Data are means and standard errors of the means. ****, p<0.0001. (E) C2C12 cells were cultured for 24 h under differentiation condition with or without 10 μM IBS004735. mRNAs for indicated genes were quantified by qRT-PCR. Trim63 (Murf1) and Fbxo32 (Atrogin1) were reduced by IBS004735 (*, p<0.05), while Fbxo30 (MUSA1) or Ctsl (Cathepsin L) was not. (F) C2C12 cells were cultured for 4 h under the amino acid-deprived condition to induce autophagy with or without 10 μM IBS004735. The cells lysates were immunoblotted by the indicated antibodies. IBS004735 did not affect the expression of autophagy-related proteins. Numbers indicate the ratios between LC3-I and LC3-II signals and between pULK1 and total ULK1 signals.

IBS004735 suppresses the expression of E3 ligases

E3 ligases, Trim63 (Murf1), Fbxo30 (Musa1), and Fbxo32 (Atrogin-1), are involved in muscle atrophy [30, 31]. IBS008378 suppressed dexamethasone-induced enhancement of Trim63 and Fbxo32 in C2C12 cells. We examined the effect of IBS004735 on the expression of these genes (Fig 6E). Trim63 and Fbxo32 were suppressed by IBS004735. Fbxo30 was also reduced, although the difference was not statistically significant. The role of autophagy in muscle atrophy is debatable. FoxO3 stimulates autophagic/lysosomal pathway and induces protein degradation in skeletal muscles [30, 31]. On the other hand, in Drosophila, autophagy prevents the accumulation of protein aggregates in muscles and delays muscle ageing [32]. In mouse, autophagy is dysregulated and p62 is accumulated in old muscles [33, 34]. These findings imply that autophagy plays a role in homeostasis of skeletal muscles. Therefore, we examined the effect of IBS004735 on molecules that were involved in autophagy. However, IBS004735 did not show any effect on the expression of p62, LC3, Atg5, and cathepsin L (Fig 6F). AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation site (Serine 555) of ULK1 was reduced under differentiation but IBS004735 did not show any effect.

IBS004735 promotes myogenesis in primary cultured human myoblasts

To examine whether IBS004735 is active not only for mouse cells but also for human cells, we applied the compound to primary cultured human myoblasts. IBS004735 increased myofusion index and MHC expression (Fig 7A). In the immunoblotting, IBS004735 facilitated MHC expression at 24 h and enhanced myogenin expression at 24, 48, and 72 h (Fig 7B). All these findings support that IBS004735 is active for human cells.

Fig 7. IBS004735 promotes myogenesis in primary cultured human myoblasts.

Fig 7

Primary cultured human myoblasts were treated with 10 μM IBS004735 under the differentiation condition. Myogenesis was evaluated as described for Fig 1. (A) IBS004735 promoted myofusion and MHC expression. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) IBS004735 enhanced MHC expression at 24 h and myogenin expression at 24, 48, and 72 h.

The effect of derivatives of IBS004735

To obtain a compound with higher activity and gain insight into which residues are essential for the activity, we generated 21 derivatives (S3 Fig and S4A Fig). However, among them, only KQ-8 facilitated myofusion and MHC expression (S4B and S4C Fig). Therefore, the whole structure of IBS004735 might be important for its activity.

Discussion

The Hippo pathway was initially identified as the signaling pathway that regulates organ size in Drosophila melanogaster [35]. In human cancers, the Hippo pathway is frequently dysregulated [36]. Consequently, TAZ is activated and causes metastasis and recurrence. Clinical data indicate that cancer patients with TAZ activation exhibit poor prognosis. On the other hand, TAZ plays important roles in tissue stem cells [37]. TAZ is necessary for normal organogenesis in heart, lung, and tooth and for tissue repair in skin and heart [7, 9, 11, 38]. TAZ also contributes to myogenesis and osteogenesis [6]. Therefore, TAZ attracts attention in the field of cancer biology and regenerative medicine [39]. However, TAZ is also known as a mechanosensor [40]. The Hippo pathway responds to nutrition signal, osmolarity, and hypoxia [41, 42]. YAP1, a TAZ homologue, is activated by hypoxia [43]. TEAD, the most prominent TAZ-binding partner, is regulated by osmotic stress [44]. TAZ activity may be regulated in response to the continuously changing cellular environment. To understand quick effects of TAZ activation and inactivation, TAZ inhibitors and activators are important. We previously reported two TAZ activators, IBS008738 and ethacridine [23, 25]. In this study, we have characterized IBS004735 as a novel TAZ activator.

IBS004735 was obtained in the same screening that yielded IBS008738 [25]. TAZ activation allows immortalized human mammary epithelial MCF10A cells to survive in the floating condition and form spheres in the serum-free medium containing insulin, epidermal growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor. We identified 50 compounds that induced the sphere formation of TAZ-expressing MCF10A cells. They activate TEAD reporter in HEK293FT cells in the presence of TAZ. These findings support that the compounds indeed activate TAZ. However, it does not mean that the compounds directly bind TAZ. As shown in S1 Fig, all 50 compounds have distinct structures. Intriguingly, the cellular effects of compounds are not the same. Diversity of structures and properties suggest that each compound has a distinct target and activates TAZ through a different mechanism. Therefore, to study a wide variety of roles of TAZ, we consider that it is meaningful to characterize these TAZ activators.

IBS004735 facilitates myogenesis and myofusion in C2C12 cells (Fig 1). IBS004735 enhances myogenic markers such as myogenin and MHC. The association of MyoD to the myogenin promoter is also promoted (Fig 2). TAZ depletion abolishes the effect of IBS004735, supporting that IBS004735 requires TAZ to exhibit its effect (Fig 1). According to the model of the canonical Hippo pathway, TAZ activator is predicted to increase unphosphorylated nuclear TAZ. However, IBS004735 does not change the subcellular localization and the phosphorylation of TAZ in C2C12 cells (Fig 3). Hence, IBS004735 is distinct from IBS008738, which increases unphosphorylated TAZ. We speculate that IBS004735 activates TAZ independently of the canonical Hippo pathway.

IBS004735 activates Akt kinases (Fig 4). The inhibition of tyrosine kinase and PI3K and the suppression of Akt kinases abolish the effect of IBS004735, suggesting that IBS004735 activates TAZ via a certain tyrosine kinase coupled with PI3K and Akt kinases (Fig 5). Indeed, several receptor tyrosine kinases are found to activate YAP1 and TAZ [45]. IBS004735 may target of one of them. Akt is activated in the TAZ-negative background at 24 h after IBS004735 treatment, while the sustained activation of Akt by IBS004735 is attenuated by TAZ depletion. This finding suggests that IBS004735 initially activates Akt independently of TAZ but that TAZ is required to maintain Akt activation. TAZ up-regulates insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS2), which recruits PI3K and activates Akt [46]. Therefore, it is not surprising that IBS004735-mediated TAZ activation maintains Akt activation. In contrast, the mechanism, by which the initial activation of Akt leads to TAZ activation, is not clear. Although there are several reports that Akt activates TAZ, the underlying molecular mechanism is yet unknown [47, 48]. One paper reported that Akt inhibits GSK3β and increases TAZ expression level [47]. Indeed, IBS004735 enhanced TAZ expression in C2C12 cells (Fig 1). Another paper reported that insulin receptor and G protein-coupled receptor cross-talk and activate YAP1 and TAZ in pancreatic cancer cells [49] and that the activation is cancelled by PI3K inhibitor. Although they did not show the requirement of Akt activation, there may be a certain mechanism by which PI3K activates YAP1 and TAZ and the target of IBS004735 could be placed in that pathway.

IBS004735 antagonizes the inhibitory effect of TNF-α on myogenesis in C2C12 cells (Fig 6). This finding is consistent with the myogenesis-promoting capacity of IBS004735. However, the underlying mechanism needs to be clarified, especially because YAP1, TAZ homologue, rather up-regulates NFκB signal in C2C12 cells [50]. Likewise, how TAZ blocks myostatin-mediated SMAD reporter is unclear. However, we could speculate that TAZ may trap SMAD proteins to interfere with myostatin signal.

In conclusion, IBS004735 is a novel TAZ activator that promotes myogenesis via Akt and TAZ in C2C12 cells. The identification of the target of IBS004735 will give insight into the mechanism, by which Akt regulates TAZ.

Materials and methods

DNA constructions and virus productions

pGL3 Myo-184- (MyoD-), 8xGT-IIC-δ51LucII- (TEAD-), 9xCAGA-MLP- (SMAD-), p(PRS-1/-4)3- (Pax3-), and pIgk cona-luciferase reporter vectors are gifts of Kenji Miyazawa (Yamanashi University), Hiroshi Sasaki (Kumamoto University), Hiroki Kurihara (The University of Tokyo), and Shoji Yamaoka (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) [5154]. pCIneoFH-TAZ, pCIneoGFP-TAZ, and pCIneoLuc-TEAD4 were described previously [23, 25].

Antibodies and reagents

Antibodies and reagents were obtained from commercial sources. The antibodies are listed in the supplementary table (S1 Table). Hoechst 33342, dexamethasone (D4902), epidermal growth factor (E9644), insulin (I5500), and genistein (G6649) (Sigma-Aldrich); anti-DYKDDDDK-tag (014–22383), anti-DYKDDDDK-tag beads (016–22784), basic fibroblast growth factor (064–04541) and Phos-tag acrylamide (WAKO chemicals); LY294002 and Akti-1/2 (Tocris Bioscience); wortmannin and rapamycin (Cayman Chemical); recombinant myostatin (788-G8-010) (R&D systems); and human TNF-α (300-01A) (PeproTech).

Cell cultures and transfection

HEK293FT cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 g/l glucose, 584 mg/l glutamine, and 110 mg/l sodium pyruvate (08458–16) (lot: L8H5641) (nacalai tesque) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (10270–106) (lot: 42Q4173K) (Thermo Fisher Science) and 10 mM Hepes-NaOH at pH 7.4 under 5% CO2 at 37ºC. MCF10A cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 5% horse serum (Invitrogen), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, and 10 μg/ml insulin. C2C12 cells were passaged in growth medium (DMEM containing 10% FBS) and differentiated in C2C12 differentiation medium (DMEM and 2% horse serum (s0900-500) (lot: S15367S0900) (Biowest)). To induce autophagy, C2C12 cells were cultured in amino acids-deprived DMEM (048–33575) (lot: APN7030) (WAKO chemicals) for 4 h. Primary cultured human skeletal myoblasts (HSkM) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Science. The cells were cultured in low-glucose DMEM (Gibco #11885–084) supplemented with 8% FBS and SkGM SingleQuots Kit (LONZA #CC-41390). To induce differentiation, cells were transferred to the low-glucose DMEM containing 2% horse serum.

qRT-PCR

mRNA was extracted by use of TRI Reagent® (Molecular Research Center, Inc.). qRT-PCR analysis was performed using SYBR Green (Roche) and ABI7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) [25]. The primers for mouse genes are; 5’-tacaggccttgctcagctc-3’ and 5’-tgtgggagttgcattcactg-3’for Myog; 5’-actttctggagccctcctggca-3’ and 5’-tttgttgcactacacagcatg-3’for Myod1; 5’-ccatggcagtgtcccagccg-3’ and 5’-ggcaggcgtgttgacagggg-3’ for Wwtr1; 5’-tgacctggaggaaaacattaaga-3’ and 5’-agccctgtatgtcttcacactg-3’ for connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf); 5’-agacctgtgcgccctccgta-3’ and 5’-tttgcagcagctcctcgggc-3’ for cyclin D1 (Ccnd1); 5’-gactcctgcagagtgaccaag-3’ and 5’-cttctacaatgctcttgatgagac-3’ for Murf1 (Trim63); 5’-gaatagcatccagatcagcag-3’ and 5’-gagaatgtggcagtgtttgca-3’ for Atrogin-1 (Fbxo32); 5’-ccttgaggctcccggcaaat-3’ and 5’-actgctccacaaaccaatgga-3’ for Musa1 (Fbxo30); 5’-tctcacgctcaaggcaatca-3’ and 5’-aagcaaaatccatcaggcctc-3’ for cathepsin L (Ctsl); 5’-aactttggcattgtggaagg-3’ and 5’-acacattgggggtaggaaca-3’ for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh). We used Gapdh as a reference.

RNA interferences

Mouse TAZ were knocked down in C2C12 cells by use of mouse Wwtr1 siRNA (s97146) (Ambion) as described previously [25]. Mouse Akt1 siRNA (SR415524) and mouse Akt2 siRNA (s62218) were purchased form OriGene and Ambion, respectively.

Sphere formation assay of MCF10A cells for the initial screening

MCF10A cells were plated at 300 cells/well in 96-well Ultra Low Attachment plates (Corning) and cultured for 10 days in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing 5 μg/ml insulin, 10 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor, 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. A cell aggregates larger than 150 μm were defined as spheres.

Myofusion index

Myofusion index was evaluated as described previously [25]. Briefly, C2C12 cells were immunostained with anti-MHC antibody and nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342. The percentage of nuclei included in MHC-positive multinuclear cells was evaluated.

Cell proliferation assay

Viable cells were evaluated by using MTT colorimetric assay, in which the conversion of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to insoluble tetrazolium by NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase was measured.

Reporter assay

C2C12 cells were plated at 1x105 cells/well in 12-well plates and cultured overnight. The cells were transfected with pGL3 Myo-184- (MyoD-), 8xGT-IIC-δ51LucII- (TEAD-), 9xCAGA-MLP- (SMAD-), and p(PRS-1/-4)3- (Pax3-) luciferase reporters alone or with TAZ. In the studies regarding TNF-α and myostatin, HEK293FT cells were plated at 1 x 106 cells/well in a 6- well plate and transfected with pIgk cona luc (125 ng) and pEF-SEAP (125 ng) or 9xCAGA-MLP-(SMAD-) luciferase (300 ng) and pCMV alkaline phosphatase (300 ng). 5 h after transfection, cells were harvested and replated at 1 x 105 cells/well in a 24-well plate. The cells were treated with various combinations of DMSO, 10 ng/ml tumor necrosis factor α, 100 ng/ml myostatin, and 10 μM IBS004735 for 6 h, and then harvested. Luciferase and alkaline phosphatase assays were performed by use of Picagene (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) and CDP-Star (Applied Biosystems), respectively. Luciferase activities were normalized by alkaline phosphatase activities.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysisS

ChIP experiments were performed as described previously [25]. Briefly, C2C12 cells were cross-linked in formaldehyde. After the reaction was quenched for 5 min with 125 mM glycine, cells were lysed in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100). Chromatin was sheared by 25 consecutive rounds in a sonicator bath and was incubated with 2 μg of antibodies. Immunoprecipitation was performed with 20 μl of protein G-Sepharose beads. Protein G-Sepharose with no antibody was used as the control (mock ChIP). Immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were isolated with Chelex-100 resin and diluted 1:2.5 for quantitative PCR analysis.

Subcellular fractionation

C2C12 cells were plated at 4x106 cells/10-cm plate. Cells were transferred to the differentiation medium, cultured with DMSO or 10 mM IBS004735 for 24 h, and harvested in 1 ml ice-cold PBS. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 200 x g for 7 min and homogenized in 0.5 ml STM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 250 mM sucrose, and 5 mM MgCl2) by 50 strokes in a glass homogenizer. The samples were kept on ice for 30 min and then vortexed for 15 sec. 30 μl of the sample was saved as a whole cell lysate. The remaining sample was centrifuged at 800 x g for 15 min to separate the first supernatant and the first pellet. The supernatant was centrifuged at 800 x g for 10 min again to collect the second supernatant, which was centrifuged at 11,000 x g for 10 min. The third supernatant was used as a cytosolic fraction. The first pellet was resuspended in 470 μl STM buffer and centrifuged at 500 x g for 15 min. The second pellet was resuspended in 470 μl STM buffer and centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 15 min. The third pellet was resuspended in 470 μl NET buffer (20 mM Hepes-NaOH pH 7.9, 500 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol, and 1% (w/v) TritonX-100), kept on ice for 30 min, vortexed for 15 sec, homogenized by sonication, and centrifuged at 9,000 x g for 30 min to collect the supernatant, which was used as a nuclear fraction.

Phosphate-affinity SDS-PAGE

Phosphate-affinity SDS-PAGE was performed by use of Phos-tagTM acrylamide (Wako chemicals) and PolyVinylidene DiFluoride (PVDF) membranes as described previously [23].

In vitro SUnSET experiment

C2C12 cells were cultured under the differentiation condition with DMSO or 10 μM IBS004735 for the indicated periods of time. 1 μM puromycin was added to the medium. 30 min later, the cells were harvested and the incorporated puromycin was detected with anti-puromycin antibody.

Synthesis of derivatives of IBS004735

Typical procedures of synthesis of derivatives are described in S3 Fig. Other derivatives shown in S4 Fig were synthesized by similar methods, and the structures and purities were confirmed by 1H NMR.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with student’s t test for the comparison between two samples and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s test for the multiple comparison using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software).

Other procedures

Immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence were performed as described previously [55].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Summary of the initial screening of TAZ activators that promote myogenesis in C2C12 cells.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Structures of fifty TAZ activators obtained through the initial screening.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Synthesis of derivatives of IBS004735.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Derivatives of IBS00473 and their effect.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 1.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 3.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 4A and Fig 4B.

(PDF)

S8 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 4C and Fig 4F.

(PDF)

S9 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 5 and Fig 6.

(PDF)

S10 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 7.

(PDF)

S1 Table. The list of the antibodies.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for Hiroshi Asahara (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), Yasutomi Kamei (Kyoto Prefectural University), Hiroki Kurihara (The University of Tokyo), Yoshihiro Ogawa (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), Hiroshi Sasaki (Kumamoto University), Kenji Miyazawa (Yamanashi University), Kohei Miyazono (The University of Tokyo), Hiroshi Takayanagi (The University of Tokyo), Sumiko Watanabe (The University of Tokyo), and Shigeru Yamada (Jissen Women’s University) for the materials and advice. X.X. and Z.Y were supported by Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho) (MEXT) scholarship. K.I. is a Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS Research Fellow).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

YH; Grant Number 22590267, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (https://www.jsps.go.jp/) YH; Grant Number 17im0210612h0001 and 18im0210612h0002, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (https://www.amed.go.jp/en/) K A-M; Suzuken Memorial Foundation (https://www.suzukenzaidan.or.jp/) K A-M; The Nakatomi Foundation (https://www.nakatomi.or.jp/) K A-M; Hoyu Science Foundation (https://www.hoyu.co.jp/zaidan/subsidy/) K A-M; Takeda Science Foundation (https://www.takeda-sci.or.jp/business/assist.html) K A-M; The Nakajima Foundation (http://www.nakajimafound.or.jp/) K A-M; Kobayashi Foundation (https://www.kisf.or.jp/english/) K A-M; The Japan Foundation for Aging and Health (https://www.tyojyu.or.jp/en/index.html) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Wang K, Degerny C, Xu M, Yang XJ. YAP, TAZ, and Yorkie: a conserved family of signal-responsive transcriptional coregulators in animal development and human disease. Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;87(1):77–91. 10.1139/O08-114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hansen CG, Moroishi T, Guan KL. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015. 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lei QY, Zhang H, Zhao B, Zha ZY, Bai F, Pei XH, et al. TAZ promotes cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition and is inhibited by the hippo pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(7):2426–36. 10.1128/MCB.01874-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai D, Ho KC, Hao Y, Yang X. Taxol resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated by the hippo pathway component TAZ and its downstream transcriptional targets Cyr61 and CTGF. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2728–38. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2711 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Azzolin L, Forcato M, Rosato A, Frasson C, et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell. 2011;147(4):759–72. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.048 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hong JH, Hwang ES, McManus MT, Amsterdam A, Tian Y, Kalmukova R, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309(5737):1074–8. 10.1126/science.1110955 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park KS, Whitsett JA, Di Palma T, Hong JH, Yaffe MB, Zannini M. TAZ interacts with TTF-1 and regulates expression of surfactant protein-C. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(17):17384–90. Epub 2004/02/17. 10.1074/jbc.M312569200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun T, Huang Z, Zhang H, Posner C, Jia G, Ramalingam TR, et al. TAZ is required for lung alveolar epithelial cell differentiation after injury. JCI Insight. 2019;5 Epub 2019/06/18. 10.1172/jci.insight.128674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murakami M, Nakagawa M, Olson EN, Nakagawa O. A WW domain protein TAZ is a critical coactivator for TBX5, a transcription factor implicated in Holt-Oram syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(50):18034–9. 10.1073/pnas.0509109102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Otsubo K, Goto H, Nishio M, Kawamura K, Yanagi S, Nishie W, et al. MOB1-YAP1/TAZ-NKX2.1 axis controls bronchioalveolar cell differentiation, adhesion and tumour formation. Oncogene. 2017;36(29):4201–11. Epub 2017/03/27. 10.1038/onc.2017.58 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mitani A, Nagase T, Fukuchi K, Aburatani H, Makita R, Kurihara H. Transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif is essential for normal alveolarization in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(4):326–38. 10.1164/rccm.200812-1827OC . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cui CB, Cooper LF, Yang X, Karsenty G, Aukhil I. Transcriptional coactivation of bone-specific transcription factor Cbfa1 by TAZ. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(3):1004–13. 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1004-1013.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang Y, Feinberg T, Keller ET, Li XY, Weiss SJ. Snail/Slug binding interactions with YAP/TAZ control skeletal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(9):917–29. Epub 2016/08/01. 10.1038/ncb3394 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5007193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu B, Huo L, Liu Y, Deng P, Szymanski J, Li J, et al. PGC-1α Controls Skeletal Stem Cell Fate and Bone-Fat Balance in Osteoporosis and Skeletal Aging by Inducing TAZ. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(2):193–209.e5. Epub 2018/07/12. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goto H, Nishio M, To Y, Oishi T, Miyachi Y, Maehama T, et al. Loss of. Development. 2018;145(6). Epub 2018/03/16. 10.1242/dev.159244 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jeong MG, Song H, Shin JH, Jeong H, Kim HK, Hwang ES. Transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif is required to sustain testicular function on aging. Aging Cell. 2017;16(5):1035–42. Epub 2017/06/14. 10.1111/acel.12631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim W, Khan SK, Gvozdenovic-Jeremic J, Kim Y, Dahlman J, Kim H, et al. Hippo signaling interactions with Wnt/β-catenin and Notch signaling repress liver tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):137–52. Epub 2016/11/21. 10.1172/JCI88486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seo E, Kim WY, Hur J, Kim H, Nam SA, Choi A, et al. The Hippo-Salvador signaling pathway regulates renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31931 Epub 2016/08/23. 10.1038/srep31931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nishio M, Sugimachi K, Goto H, Wang J, Morikawa T, Miyachi Y, et al. Dysregulated YAP1/TAZ and TGF-β signaling mediate hepatocarcinogenesis in Mob1a/1b-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. 10.1073/pnas.1517188113 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu-Chittenden Y, Huang B, Shim JS, Chen Q, Lee SJ, Anders RA, et al. Genetic and pharmacological disruption of the TEAD-YAP complex suppresses the oncogenic activity of YAP. Genes Dev. 2012;26(12):1300–5. 10.1101/gad.192856.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Byun MR, Jeong H, Bae SJ, Kim AR, Hwang ES, Hong JH. TAZ is required for the osteogenic and anti-adipogenic activities of kaempferol. Bone. 2012;50(1):364–72. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.035 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jang EJ, Jeong H, Kang JO, Kim NJ, Kim MS, Choi SH, et al. TM-25659 enhances osteogenic differentiation and suppresses adipogenic differentiation by modulating the transcriptional co-activator TAZ. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(5):1584–94. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01664.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kawano S, Maruyama J, Nagashima S, Inami K, Qiu W, Iwasa H, et al. A cell-based screening for TAZ activators identifies ethacridine, a widely used antiseptic and abortifacient, as a compound that promotes dephosphorylation of TAZ and inhibits adipogenesis in C3H10T1/2 cells. J Biochem. 2015;158(5):413–23. 10.1093/jb/mvv051 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ma R, Morshed SA, Latif R, Davies TF. TAZ Induction Directs Differentiation of Thyroid Follicular Cells from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Thyroid. 2017;27(2):292–9. Epub 2017/01/03. 10.1089/thy.2016.0264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Z, Nakagawa K, Sarkar A, Maruyama J, Iwasa H, Bao Y, et al. Screening with a novel cell-based assay for TAZ activators identifies a compound that enhances myogenesis in C2C12 cells and facilitates muscle repair in the muscle injury model. Mol Cell Biol. 2014. 10.1128/MCB.01346-13 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu FX, Zhao B, Panupinthu N, Jewell JL, Lian I, Wang LH, et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Cell. 2012;150(4):780–91. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kodaka M, Hata Y. The mammalian Hippo pathway: regulation and function of YAP1 and TAZ. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(2):285–306. Epub 2014/09/30. 10.1007/s00018-014-1742-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fearon KC, Glass DJ, Guttridge DC. Cancer cachexia: mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways. Cell Metab. 2012;16(2):153–66. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sakuma K, Aoi W, Yamaguchi A. Current understanding of sarcopenia: possible candidates modulating muscle mass. Pflugers Arch. 2015;467(2):213–29. 10.1007/s00424-014-1527-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Foletta VC, White LJ, Larsen AE, Léger B, Russell AP. The role and regulation of MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in skeletal muscle atrophy. Pflugers Arch. 2011;461(3):325–35. 10.1007/s00424-010-0919-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Milan G, Romanello V, Pescatore F, Armani A, Paik JH, Frasson L, et al. Regulation of autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system by the FoxO transcriptional network during muscle atrophy. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6670 Epub 2015/04/10. 10.1038/ncomms7670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Demontis F, Perrimon N. FOXO/4E-BP signaling in Drosophila muscles regulates organism-wide proteostasis during aging. Cell. 2010;143(5):813–25. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.White Z, White RB, McMahon C, Grounds MD, Shavlakadze T. High mTORC1 signaling is maintained, while protein degradation pathways are perturbed in old murine skeletal muscles in the fasted state. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;78:10–21. Epub 2016/06/22. 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.06.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakuma K, Kinoshita M, Ito Y, Aizawa M, Aoi W, Yamaguchi A. p62/SQSTM1 but not LC3 is accumulated in sarcopenic muscle of mice. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(2):204–12. Epub 2015/06/08. 10.1002/jcsm.12045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Harvey K, Tapon N. The Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway—an emerging tumour-suppressor network. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(3):182–91. 10.1038/nrc2070 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM. The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(4):246–57. 10.1038/nrc3458 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ramos A, Camargo FD. The Hippo signaling pathway and stem cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22(7):339–46. 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li CY, Hu J, Lu H, Lan J, Du W, Galicia N, et al. αE-catenin inhibits YAP/TAZ activity to regulate signalling centre formation during tooth development. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12133 Epub 2016/07/13. 10.1038/ncomms12133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Johnson R, Halder G. The two faces of Hippo: targeting the Hippo pathway for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(1):63–79. 10.1038/nrd4161 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474(7350):179–83. 10.1038/nature10137 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mo JS, Meng Z, Kim YC, Park HW, Hansen CG, Kim S, et al. Cellular energy stress induces AMPK-mediated regulation of YAP and the Hippo pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(4):500–10. 10.1038/ncb3111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang W, Xiao ZD, Li X, Aziz KE, Gan B, Johnson RL, et al. AMPK modulates Hippo pathway activity to regulate energy homeostasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(4):490–9. 10.1038/ncb3113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma B, Chen Y, Chen L, Cheng H, Mu C, Li J, et al. Hypoxia regulates Hippo signalling through the SIAH2 ubiquitin E3 ligase. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(1):95–103. Epub 2014/12/01. 10.1038/ncb3073 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lin KC, Moroishi T, Meng Z, Jeong HS, Plouffe SW, Sekido Y, et al. Regulation of Hippo pathway transcription factor TEAD by p38 MAPK-induced cytoplasmic translocation. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(8):996–1002. 10.1038/ncb3581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Azad T, Nouri K, Janse van Rensburg HJ, Maritan SM, Wu L, Hao Y, et al. A gain-of-functional screen identifies the Hippo pathway as a central mediator of receptor tyrosine kinases during tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2020;39(2):334–55. Epub 2019/09/02. 10.1038/s41388-019-0988-y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jeong SH, Kim HB, Kim MC, Lee JM, Lee JH, Kim JH, et al. Hippo-mediated suppression of IRS2/AKT signaling prevents hepatic steatosis and liver cancer. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(3):1010–25. Epub 2018/02/05. 10.1172/JCI95802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Feng J, Sun Q, Liu L, Xing D. Photoactivation of TAZ via Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway promotes osteogenic differentiation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;66:59–68. Epub 2015/07/06. 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.07.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang N, Li Y, Li Z, Ma J, Wu X, Pan R, et al. IRS-1 targets TAZ to inhibit adipogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through PI3K-Akt and MEK-ERK pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;849:11–21. Epub 2019/02/01. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.01.064 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hao F, Xu Q, Zhao Y, Stevens JV, Young SH, Sinnett-Smith J, et al. Insulin Receptor and GPCR Crosstalk Stimulates YAP via PI3K and PKD in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15(7):929–41. Epub 2017/03/30. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ye S, Lawlor MA, Rivera-Reyes A, Egolf S, Chor S, Pak K, et al. YAP1-Mediated Suppression of USP31 Enhances NFκB Activity to Promote Sarcomagenesis. Cancer Res. 2018;78(10):2705–20. Epub 2018/02/28. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-4052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Murakami M, Tominaga J, Makita R, Uchijima Y, Kurihara Y, Nakagawa O, et al. Transcriptional activity of Pax3 is co-activated by TAZ. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;339(2):533–9. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.214 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ota M, Sasaki H. Mammalian Tead proteins regulate cell proliferation and contact inhibition as transcriptional mediators of Hippo signaling. Development. 2008;135(24):4059–69. 10.1242/dev.027151 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kobayashi N, Goto K, Horiguchi K, Nagata M, Kawata M, Miyazawa K, et al. c-Ski activates MyoD in the nucleus of myoblastic cells through suppression of histone deacetylases. Genes Cells. 2007;12(3):375–85. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01052.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Uno M, Saitoh Y, Mochida K, Tsuruyama E, Kiyono T, Imoto I, et al. NF-κB inducing kinase, a central signaling component of the non-canonical pathway of NF-κB, contributes to ovarian cancer progression. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88347 10.1371/journal.pone.0088347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ikeda M, Hirabayashi S, Fujiwara N, Mori H, Kawata A, Iida J, et al. Ras-association domain family protein 6 induces apoptosis via both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313(7):1484–95. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Arun Rishi

2 Dec 2019

PONE-D-19-31614

Characterization of a novel compound that promotes myogenesis via Akt and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in mouse C2C12 cells

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hata,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

As noted below, both the reviewers noted a few minor deficiencies and clarifications, and requested a few additional experiments possibly inclusion of a key validation experiment utilizing primary human myoblasts. 

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jan 16 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Arun Rishi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

3.  PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

'Yutaka Hata collaborated with Shinogi Co. Ltd. to develop drugs against sarcopenia between 2017 and 2018.'

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of this manuscript identified a novel activator compound of TAZ and promotes myogenesis via Akt.This manuscript is organized well and data could support the conclusion. There are some points which could be improved.

1. In figure 1D, in IBS004735 treatment groups, protein expression levels of TAZ and Myogenin were elevated significantly in 48h but decreased in 72h, how to explain this phenomenon?

2. In figure 1E, the TAZ siRNA transfection efficiency detected by WB should be repeated.

3. In figure 4F, either in control siRNA or in TAZ siRNA group, protein expression level of TAZ decreased under IBS004735 treatment with 48h, this seemed to contradict to the result in fig 1D.

4. The introduction needs to be reorganized.

Reviewer #2: Kodaka and colleagues investigated the effects of IBS004735 on TAZ activation in cultured C2C12 cells. The main finding is that IBS004735 stimulates TAZ activity via Akt/mTORC1 signaling. The experiments are conducted with a high technical standard. Overall, the manuscript is well written and contains sufficient details for the readers. The major limitation of the work is that all experiments are performed in C2C12 cell culture, and therefore, the relevance of the findings in humans remains unknown. This limitation could be addressed by repeating key experiments in primary human myoblasts. Otherwise, I only have a few comments.

• The compound IBS004735 was selected as one among many compounds known to promote myogenesis in C2C12 cells. It would be helpful for the reader to understand why the authors selected exactly this compound and not another one. I suggest that this information is included in the introduction.

• Line 101-116 summarized previous work and introduce the rationale for the present investigation. I fully recognize the need for this information, but the authors should consider moving such information to the introduction to avoid any repetitions.

• Figure 4A: please specify the specific phosphorylation sites at Akt, mTOR, and S6K.

• Figure 6F: please specify the specific phosphorylation sites at ULK1. Some sites are activating and some are inhibiting ULK1 activity.

• PI3K activity is usually regulated by upstream enzymes or receptors that mediates the effect of growth factors and hormones. How does IBS004735 regulated PI3K activity?

• I suggest that the most important experiments are reproduced in primary human myoblasts to check if the findings can be translated to humans.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Andreas Buch Møller

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0231265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231265.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Mar 2020

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-19-31614

Title: Characterization of a novel compound that promotes myogenesis via Akt and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in mouse C2C12 cells

Authors: Kodaka M, Mao F, et al

� We thank reviewers for very useful comments and have thoroughly revised the manuscript according to their comments. Our responses are listed as follows.

Reponses to the comments of Reviewer #1

The authors of this manuscript identified a novel activator compound of TAZ and promotes myogenesis via Akt. This manuscript is organized well and data could support the conclusion. There are some points which could be improved.

� We greatly appreciate the comments. We are very happy to hear that our conclusion is basically supported by our findings.

1. In figure 1D, in IBS004735 treatment groups, protein expression levels of TAZ and Myogenin were elevated significantly in 48h but decreased in 72h, how to explain this phenomenon?

� We greatly appreciate this comment. As the reviewer pointed out, the finding shown in the original figure was incongruous. The reviewer’s comment prompted us to repeat the experiment and re-evaluated the protein expression. In conclusion, we found that we need to change our argument, TAZ and myogenin are not reduced at 72 h and remain at almost the same level as at 48 h. We have replaced Figure 1D with a new one, and have revised the text too (Figure 1D; page 4, line 113).

2. In figure 1E, the TAZ siRNA transfection efficiency detected by WB should be repeated.

� We reperformed the experiment shown in Figure 1E and replaced W-B with a new one (Figure 1F). We hope the current figure clearly demonstrates that TAZ is efficiently suppressed.

3. In figure 4F, either in control siRNA or in TAZ siRNA group, protein expression level of TAZ decreased under IBS004735 treatment with 48h, this seemed to contradict to the result in fig 1D.

� As we did for Figure 1D, we repeated the experiment for Figure 4F and revaluated TAZ expression. Under the transfection with control siRNA, TAZ expression did not change as in Figure 1D. We replaced the image with a new one (Figure 4F, siCont, TAZ). In terms of TAZ siRNA group, TAZ was suppressed as expected in Figure 4F, while in Figure 1D, we did not perform the silencing of TAZ. Therefore, we consider that there was no contradiction here. As we repeated the experiment, we replaced the image with a new one in Figure 4F, siTAZ, TAZ. We hope that we have properly responded to the reviewer’s comment.

4. The introduction needs to be reorganized.

� As Reviewer #2 also requested us to revise the introduction, we reorganized Introduction and summarized the original screening to explain why we focused on IBS004735 in this study (page 4, line 85 to line 105).

Reponses to the comments of Reviewer #2

Kodaka and colleagues investigated the effects of IBS004735 on TAZ activation in cultured C2C12 cells. The main finding is that IBS004735 stimulates TAZ activity via Akt/mTORC1 signaling. The experiments are conducted with a high technical standard. Overall, the manuscript is well written and contains sufficient details for the readers. The major limitation of the work is that all experiments are performed in C2C12 cell culture, and therefore, the relevance of the findings in humans remains unknown. This limitation could be addressed by repeating key experiments

in primary human myoblasts.

� We greatly appreciate this comment. Encouraged by this comment, we applied our compound to primary human myoblasts and confirmed its activity. We added the information in Materials and Methods and described the results (Figure 7; page 7, line 223 to line 228; page 9, line 323 to 327).

Otherwise, I only have a few comments.

• The compound IBS004735 was selected as one among many compounds known to promote myogenesis in C2C12 cells. It would be helpful for the reader to understand why the authors selected exactly this compound and not another one. I suggest that this information is included in the introduction.

• Line 101-116 summarized previous work and introduce the rationale for the present investigation. I fully recognize the need for this information, but the authors should consider moving such information to the introduction to avoid any repetitions.

� According these two comments and the comment of Reviewer #1, we have reorganized Introduction (page 4, line 85 to line 105). We hope that readers can follow why we focused on IBS004735 in this study.

• Figure 4A: please specify the specific phosphorylation sites at Akt, mTOR, and S6K.

� We have described the specific phosphorylation sites at Akt, mTOR, and S6K in the revised Figure 4A.

•Figure 6F: please specify the specific phosphorylation sites at ULK1. Some sites are activating and some are inhibiting ULK1 activity.

� We have described the specific phosphorylation site at ULK1 and described that this site is an activating phosphorylation site (Figure 6; page 7, line 220 and line 221).

• PI3K activity is usually regulated by upstream enzymes or receptors that mediates the effect of

growth factors and hormones. How does IBS004735 regulated PI3K activity?

As shown in Figure 5B, tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocks the effect of IBS004735. Therefore, we speculate that IBS004735 activates a certain tyrosine kinase receptor. Actually, we attempted during the revision to identify which tyrosine kinase is activated by IBS004735. As far as we know, IBS004735 does not activate Insulin receptor, IGF-1 receptor, PDGF receptor, EGF receptors, ErB2, ErB4, VEGF receptor, Met, or ALK. We expressed these receptors in HEK293 cells and treated the cells with IBS004735. However, to our regret, none of them was activated by IBS004735. A recent study also discusses that various receptor tyrosine kinases activate TAZ. In the revised manuscript, we have cited this paper and have added discussion (page 8, line 272 to line 274).

• I suggest that the most important experiments are reproduced in primary human myoblasts to check if the findings can be translated to humans.

� Thank you very much for your suggestion. In the revised manuscript, we can show that IBS004735 works not only on C2C12 cells but also on primary cultured myoblasts. We have described the result and the method (Figure 7; page 7, line 223 to line 228; page 9, line 323 to 327)

Other changes

1. Fengju Mao performed experiments for the revision. Thus, in the revised manuscript, it is described that Kodaka and Mao equally contributed to this work (page 1, line 32).

2. In the original manuscript, we commented “ethacridine does not promote myogenesis in C2C12 cells”. But this argument is not directly related to this study. Hence, we have deleted this statement and have omitted the phrase “data not shown” according to the policy of PLOS ONE.

3. We have added the statement “This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials” to COI (page 12, line 438).

4. We have added the captions for Supporting information at the end of the manuscript (page 12, line 440 to page 13, line 452).

5. We have shown uncropped blot/gel images in Supplementary information (Supplementary Figure 5 to Supplementary Figure 10).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Our responses (Manuscript Number 03042020).docx

Decision Letter 1

Arun Rishi

20 Mar 2020

Characterization of a novel compound that promotes myogenesis via Akt and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in mouse C2C12 cells

PONE-D-19-31614R1

Dear Dr. Hata,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Arun Rishi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been satisfactory addressed and the revised manuscript did not raise further concerns.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Andreas Buch Møller

Acceptance letter

Arun Rishi

24 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-31614R1

Characterization of a novel compound that promotes myogenesis via Akt and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in mouse C2C12 cells

Dear Dr. Hata:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof Arun Rishi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Summary of the initial screening of TAZ activators that promote myogenesis in C2C12 cells.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Structures of fifty TAZ activators obtained through the initial screening.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Synthesis of derivatives of IBS004735.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. Derivatives of IBS00473 and their effect.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 1.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 3.

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 4A and Fig 4B.

    (PDF)

    S8 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 4C and Fig 4F.

    (PDF)

    S9 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 5 and Fig 6.

    (PDF)

    S10 Fig. Uncropped data for Fig 7.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. The list of the antibodies.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Our responses (Manuscript Number 03042020).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES