Acquired mechanical sensitivity of clustered Kv7.4 in outer hair cell sculpts fast cycle-by-cycle sound amplification and tuning.
Abstract
The mammalian cochlea relies on active electromotility of outer hair cells (OHCs) to resolve sound frequencies. OHCs use ionic channels and somatic electromotility to achieve the process. It is unclear, though, how the kinetics of voltage-gated ionic channels operate to overcome extrinsic viscous drag on OHCs at high frequency. Here, we report ultrafast electromechanical gating of clustered Kv7.4 in OHCs. Increases in kinetics and sensitivity resulting from cooperativity among clustered-Kv7.4 were revealed, using optogenetics strategies. Upon clustering, the half-activation voltage shifted negative, and the speed of activation increased relative to solitary channels. Clustering also rendered Kv7.4 channels mechanically sensitive, confirmed in consolidated Kv7.4 channels at the base of OHCs. Kv7.4 clusters provide OHCs with ultrafast electromechanical channel gating, varying in magnitude and speed along the cochlea axis. Ultrafast Kv7.4 gating provides OHCs with a feedback mechanism that enables the cochlea to overcome viscous drag and resolve sounds at auditory frequencies.
INTRODUCTION
Among the remarkable features of the mammalian auditory system is its unparalleled speed. Second-order neurons in the auditory brainstem can detect submillisecond interaural timing differences (1), which requires each ear to transmit action potentials to the central nervous system at precise times relative to peaks in the sound waveform over a broad range of intensities. Cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) are key to this process, endowing the mammalian ear with a fast electromechanical amplification mechanism essential to the dynamic range and speed of sound encoding. OHCs are capable of generating cycle-by-cycle force (2) at auditory frequencies exceeding 50 kHz [(3), cf. (4)], but how this is achieved given the intrinsic biophysical properties of the cell and whether cycle-by-cycle amplification occurs in the living cochlea remain unclear (5).
The OHC somatic electromechanical motor draws power from voltage-driven charge displacement (6) and requires the expression of the protein prestin in the cell membrane to function (7). The first stage of transduction is achieved through the direct mechanical gating of mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) channels in the stereocilia (8), which modulates the input transduction current at auditory frequencies (9). When cationic current enters the cell, the membrane depolarizes, driving a piezoelectric-like shortening of the cell and converting electrical input into mechanical output (10). This OHC electromechanical motor is the primary mechanism underlying sound-driven amplification in the cochlea (11, 12). The shortening of OHCs in response to MET currents is nearly constant for low-frequency stimuli but begins to decline for frequencies above the electromechanical corner frequency of the cell—a frequency set in part by the capacitance and conductance of the OHC at the resting membrane potential (6, 13). The corner frequency is unusually high in OHCs relative to most excitable cells, primarily due to the expression of the K+ channel Kv7.4, which introduces a large conductance, and concomitant current (IKn), at the cell resting potential (14, 15). Although the contribution of Kv7.4 channels to the tonic conductance and corner frequency is clear (13), it is not known whether the channels also contribute to OHC function at auditory frequencies on a cycle-by-cycle basis.
Here, we report ultrafast electromechanical gating of Kv7.4 in murine cochlear OHCs that develops with hearing as channel density in the basal pole of the cell increases. Analogous increases in speed and mechanosensitivity were observed when clustering was artificially induced in a model cell line using an optogenetic approach (16, 17), suggesting that physical interaction between channels coordinates gating (18). Results demonstrate that Kv7.4 channel cooperativity enhances kinetics and mechanosensitivity relative to solitary channels and endows OHCs with the ability to respond to changes in voltage and mechanical stress on a cycle-by-cycle basis at auditory frequencies. Simulations of OHC electromechanical function in the context of the cochlear load further indicate that Kv7.4 cooperativity and the ensuing mechanosensitivity extend the bandwidth and tune the frequency-dependent power efficiency of OHCs to match the tonotopic map in the cochlea—features that may be essential to the emergent frequency selectivity and sensitivity of the active cochlea.
RESULTS
Consolidation of Kv7.4 channels at the basal pole of OHCs parallels the maturation of channel kinetics
We hypothesized that consolidation of Kv7.4 channels at the basal pole of OHCs is required for cooperativity, and therefore, we expected increases in channel clusters to occur in parallel with maturation of the associated ionic current IKn (14). Channel clustering was monitored as the fractional ratio (cluster area/OHC surface area) during the development of hearing in mice using immunolabeling in OHCs located along the cochlear tonotopic map, representing characteristic frequencies (CFs) from 2 to 10 kHz (Fig. 1A). Before the onset of hearing, Kv7.4 channels were dispersed spatially along the basolateral membrane of OHCs [postnatal day 4 (P4) and P8; Fig. 1, B and C]. With the maturation of hearing, the channels consolidated into tight clusters at the basal pole of OHCs (P24; Fig. 1D). In mature cochleae, the cluster area (Fig. 1E) and the puncta density (Fig. 1F) both increased along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea from apex to base, suggesting a role for Kv7.4 expression and clustering in the frequency response of OHCs.
The kinetics of IKn developed in parallel with the formation of Kv7.4 clusters at the basal pole of OHCs. At P8, outward K+ currents in OHCs at the 3- to 4-kHz location exhibited a Boltzmann function half-activation voltage V1/2 = −33.6 ± 1.0 mV and a voltage sensitivity at half-activation of 56.5 ± 5.1 V−1 (P8, n = 15; Fig. 2, A and C). By P24, the half-activation shifted negative V1/2 = −81.1 ± 1.7 mV, and the sensitivity increased to 97.1 ± 6.0 V−1 (P24, n = 17; Fig. 2, B and C). The activation time constant reduced three- to eightfold from P8 and P24 (fig. S1). Blocking with linopirdine (lino) and XE991 confirmed that a majority of this outward current was due to Kv7.4 (19, 20). In mature mice (P24), both kinetics and voltage sensitivity at half-activation changed with location along with the tonotopic map and associated changes in channel density. Most notably, the voltage sensitivity, which reflects the effective gating charge, increased along the low-to-high frequency axis of the cochlea (Fig. 2D, blue) and the activation time constant (τact) decreased (Fig. 2E, blue). After Kv7.4 clustering at the basal pole (P24), IKn exhibited high-temperature sensitivity (Fig. 3A), and activation kinetics increased with CF along with the tonotopic map in the cochlea. Temperature and voltage dependence is shown for OHCs located at ~2 kHz CF location (Q10 ~ 2.3; Fig. 3, B and C). Kinetics increased with CF location from apex to base at 30°C and, when extrapolated to 37°C, exhibited submillisecond time constants (Fig. 3C).
Kv7.4 cooperativity is revealed by inducing high channel density in HEK cells
We expressed mouse Kv7.4 channels in the human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and used an optogenetic strategy to induce clustering. A system to coalesce channels was constructed by fusing the Kv7.4 N terminus with truncated CIB1 (CIBN) and coexpressing with CIBN-cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) (17). In this system, exposure to blue light (488 nm) mediates oligomerization of the N termini CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4 channel subunits, while enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and mCherry served as reporters (Fig. 4A; see also fig. S2). Cotransfection, followed by exposure to blue light, induced clustering (fig. S2). Clustering was confirmed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), which showed dynamic recruitment of CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4 and CRY2-mCherry with a time constant of ~1.4 ± 0.6 and 1.0 ± 0.4 min (n = 9), respectively, compared to a recovery time constant of EGFP alone, 0.2 ± 0.1 min (n = 5) (Fig. 4B). For cells transfected with CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4 and CRY2-mCherry, a family of voltage steps elicited outward currents with delayed activation kinetics (21) (fig. S2). In contrast, after ~4 min of blue-light exposure, current traces showed visibly increased onset and deactivation kinetics (Fig. 4C). Blue-light exposure shifted the voltage activation negative ~8 mV and increased the speed by two- to eightfold (Fig. 4, D and E), while current amplitude [maximum current density (pA/pF)] did not change significantly; 72.8 ± 19.9 versus 74.5 ± 16.8 (n = 18; P = 0.8), respectively. Voltage sensitivity (Fig. 4D) was determined from tail currents for finite length voltage commands. We varied the exposure time to assess time-dependent changes in the τact (Fig. 4F and inset). The slow activation became increasingly faster as the duration of blue-light exposure increased, while the steady-state current amplitude remained unchanged [current density at 0 mV was 48.4 ± 12.6 before and 51.1 ± 17.2 (pA/pF) after blue-light illumination, n = 21; P = 0.6]. Changes in kinetics with blue-light exposure demonstrate the cooperativity of Kv7.4 channels when expressed in high density.
The cooperativity hypothesis is also supported by changes in the apparent gating charge movement and estimates of the number of independent channel units. We measured the gating current in CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4 and CRY2-mCherry cotransfected cells before and after blue-light exposure to determine voltage dependence of charge movements (Q-V curve) (Fig. 4G). Blue-light exposure shifted the Q-V half to the left from −40.9 ± 2.1 to −45.7 ± 2.4 (mV, n = 7; P < 0.002) and increased the voltage sensitivity at half-activation from 59.7 ± 7.4 to 97.2 ± 19.1 (V−1, n = 7; P < 0.0004). The difference in the transition Gibbs free energy (22) in clustered versus solitary states was −1.1 ± 0.2 kcal/mol (n = 7), suggesting cluster-driven cooperativity that may favor specific closed state(s). This implication was further supported by nonstationary fluctuation analysis. The variance of ~200 gating current sweeps showed a parabolic profile with a leftward shift in the gating current fluctuations as a function of mean current following blue-light exposure (Fig. 4H). If the unitary gating charge remained unchanged, the leftward shift suggests a reduction in the apparent number of functional channel units in the membrane, consistent with the induction of cooperativity by clustering of the channels.
Kv7.4 mechanosensitivity emerges with cooperativity
In mature cochleae, consolidated Kv7.4 clusters are located between the OHC lateral wall motor and adjacent Deiters’ cell and are subject to mechanical forces during electromotility. We examined the mechanosensitivity of Kv7.4 channels in HEK 293 cells by recording changes in IKn resulting from blunt probe ~0.6-μm mechanical indentation of the plasma membrane. Mechanosensitivity was not detected in HEK cell expressing solitary channels in control conditions (Fig. 5, A to C). In contrast, in CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4 plus CRY2-mCherry cotransfected cells, mechanosensitivity emerged after inducing clustering by blue-light exposure (Fig. 5, D to F, green versus blue). After clustering of Kv7.4, application of mechanical stress increased the peak voltage-evoked current (Fig. 5, D and E, green) and shifted half-activation voltage leftward ~32 ± 3 mV (n = 7) (Fig. 5F). The increase in peak current evoked by stress was over and above the peak current that could be evoked by voltage. Although alternative explanations are possible, the transition state model introduced below suggests that mechanosensitivity may arise from a late conformational transition, after transitions responsible for voltage sensitivity pose Kv7.4 channels for stochastic opening (fig. S4).
On the basis of results in HEK cells, we hypothesized that IKn in OHCs would become mechanically sensitive as Kv7.4 channels clustered during maturation of hearing. To test this idea, mechanical sensitivity in OHCs located at the ~3- to 4-kHz place map in the cochlea at P6 (before clustering) was compared to P21 (after clustering). For the example shown (Fig. 5G), the OHC basolateral membrane was indented by ~0.4 μm while maintaining a gigohm seal at the recording electrode. The outward current density and time constant of onset recorded in P6 OHCs were not altered by the mechanical somatic indentation (Fig. 5G). In sharp contrast, in P21 OHCs, the same mechanical stimulus resulted in a ~1.3-fold increase in current magnitude and ~15 ± 4 mV leftward shift in the half-activation voltage (Fig. 5, H and I). The opposite was found when removing the resting turgor pressure and membrane stress in adult OHCs by applying a hypertonic extracellular solution (Fig. 5, J to L). The hypertonic solution did not alter the distribution of Kv7.4 in OHCs (fig. S3). Results demonstrate that Kv7.4 consolidated at the basal pole in mature OHCs develop mechanosensitivity.
Since prestin (Slc26a5) expression alters membrane tension in OHCs and changes IKn properties when cotransfected in Chinese hamster ovary cells (23), we predicted that IKn properties in the prestin null (Slc26a5−/−) would differ from wild-type (Slc26a5+/+) OHCs. Voltage-clamp recordings of IKn from P24 OHCs at 3- to 4-kHz cochlear location from Slc26a5+/+ (fig. S4, A and B, black) compared to Slc26a5−/− (fig. S4, A to C, blue) mice showed current with reduced magnitude (~1.7-fold; n = 7), 24-mV rightward shift in the half-activation voltage, and increased activation time constant (>10-fold). To attribute the observed IKn properties to a potential dependence of clustering on prestin expression, we compared the expression pattern of Kv7.4 in OHCs of Slc26a5−/− and their Slc26a5+/+ littermates. Kv7.4 expression was scattered and supranuclear in Slc26a5−/− OHC membrane (fig. S4D), in contrast to the characteristic infranuclear consolidated expression in the Slc26a5+/+ mice. Hence, Kv7.4 clustering and ultrafast electromechanical sensitivity appear to require prestin to develop, directly or indirectly.
Ultrafast electromechanical Kv7.4 gating in OHCs is predicted to markedly enhance the bandwidth, power efficiency, and tuning in the cochlea
We formulated a biophysically based model to examine potential consequences of ultrafast Kv7.4 mechanical gating on OHC electromotility and cochlear function. Details of the model are provided in the Supplementary Materials. We found a simple transition-state model (24) consisting of three closed states, and one open state (Fig. 6A) was sufficient to reproduce the significant effects of clustering, voltage, and mechanical stress on whole-cell currents both in HEK 293 cells (fig. S5) and in OHCs (Fig. 6). The cell membrane was modeled using the standard approach with variable ionic conductances as well as linear and nonlinear (piezoelectric) capacitance (Fig. 6B). After confirming the accuracy of the model to predict electromechanical gating and currents measured in adult OHCs (Fig. 6, C to E), we inserted the Kv7.4 channel model into a piezoelectric model of an OHC based on (25). The OHC was also coupled to a simplified spring-mass-damper model of the local cochlear load, simulating the OHC location between Deiters’ cell at the base and the tectorial membrane at the apex (Fig. 6F) (5, 26). The coupled model was used to predict the frequency response and power efficiency of an OHC from the 3-kHz region of the cochlea [based on the first harmonic extracted from nonlinear time-domain simulations (Fig. 6, G and H)]. Ultrafast electromechanical gating of Kv7.4 arising from the cooperativity of channels is predicted by the simulations to endow OHCs with the ability to sense and react to the cochlear load on a cycle-by-cycle basis. The ability to sense the mechanical load adds to the emergent tuning of the cochlea (Fig. 6G, red) and improves the electrical-to-mechanical power conversion of OHCs by a form of dynamic impedance matching (Fig. 6H, red). Although the OHC electromotility gain is sensitive to specific model parameters (table S1), the prediction that Kv7.4 mechanosensitivity tunes OHC electromechanics to match the cochlear load is robust. Thus, the electromechanical properties of Kv7.4 channels are likely essential to OHC function and tuned cochlear amplification.
DISCUSSION
Results demonstrate that Kv7.4 channels acquire ultrafast electromechanical gating in mature OHCs through intrachannel cooperativity. Ultrafast kinetics develop in OHCs during maturation of hearing as Kv7.4 channels consolidate in high-density clusters at the basal pole. Intrachannel cooperativity leading to enhanced electromechanical sensitivity is a property of Kv7.4 channels and could also be induced, in vitro, in HEK 293 cells using an optogenetic approach to coalesce channels into clusters. In mature OHCs, the magnitude and kinetics of IKn both increase with CF location from apex to base, demonstrating that Kv7.4 function is titrated in OHCs to match the local tonotopic requirements of the cochlea through both expression (setting IKn magnitude) and cooperativity (setting IKn kinetics). This tonotopic distribution augments previously established distributions in MET currents, prestin expression, cell electromechanics, and morphology reported previously (27), clearly confirming the fact that individual OHCs are specialized to match the requirements at their specific location in the cochlea.
Our findings of Kv7.4 cooperativity are in conceptual agreement with recent reports demonstrating voltage-gated K+ and Ca2+ channel mutations resulting in properties inconsistent with the expectations of individual channels with distinct autonomous voltage-dependent gating (28, 29). Similar accounts were described for the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, where the elementary properties of single-channel events were compared to membrane patches containing multiple channels (30). Intrachannel cooperativity does not operate alone in OHCs but appears to combine with other factors to set the kinetics and highly hyperpolarized half-activation voltage of IKn (31). Kv7.4 accessory subunits regulate the voltage-dependent activation, which would be absent in the cell line and may explain why chemically induced Kv7.4 aggregation does not shift the half-activation as much as development in OHCs (Figs. 2C and 4D).
Mechanosensitivity of Kv7.4 revealed here emerges with cooperativity, provides OHCs with the ability to sense the external load acting on the cell, and is likely to be extremely important to OHC function in the cochlea. The reason mechanosensitivity is so essential is most clearly illustrated in Fig. 6, where the displacement of an OHC from the 3-kHz location is shown as a function of frequency in Fig. 6G under three conditions: Kv7.4 null (black), Kv7.4 tonic DC conductance only (blue, dashed), and Kv7.4 full electromechanical function (red). All three curves are subject to the same overdamped cochlear load and plotted relative to the magnitude of a sinusoidal MET current input. As expected, adding a tonic DC conductance of Kv7.4 at rest shifts the OHC corner frequency up (13), but this comes at the expense of sensitivity (gain, Fig. 6G, blue dashed line), making it unclear what advantage a leaky DC conductance would provide for hearing other than the partial flattening of the OHC gain. In sharp contrast, ultrafast cycle-by-cycle mechanosensitivity introduced a marked shift in the corner frequency and increased the gain at CF (Fig. 6G, asterisk). The tuning of the OHC emerged when operating in the context of the cochlear load. The tuning arises because the stress acting on Kv7.4 is dominated by the elastic load at low frequencies (below CF), but dominated by the mass load at high frequencies (above CF). This causes a sign reversal of the stress relative to the cell displacement, and hence, the electrical contribution of Kv7.4 reverses from a leak conductance at low frequencies to a counterbalancing current at high frequencies (Fig. 6I). Thus, the best frequency lies between these two extremes: the optimal state of the electromechanical force (Fig. 6G, asterisk). The net effect is that OHCs react to the cochlear load and automatically adjust their response to deliver the highest magnitude displacement at the CF frequency. Hence, the mechanosensitivity of cooperative Kv7.4 channels is predicted to markedly attenuate the low-frequency response while amplifying the response at CF. This effect requires the OHC to work in the context of the cochlear load and would not be seen in isolated cells without introducing the appropriate load. The cochlear load was overdamped in the simulations, but the mechanical response looks underdamped. Conversion to an underdamped system by mechanosensitivity of Kv7.4 is likely the elusive mechanism used by OHCs to cancel viscous losses, long thought to occur in the active cochlea, but with unclear origins (32–34).
Mechanosensitivity is also predicted to optimize the efficiency of OHCs. The endolymphatic potential is the battery that drives MET currents and provides the electrical power input to OHCs. This electrical power is converted to mechanical power by the piezoelectric-like motor of the lateral wall (fig. S5), and the ratio of the two provides the power efficiency. Like skeletal muscle cells, the power efficiency in OHCs is optimized at a specific velocity and force that match the impedance of the load to the resistance of the cell (25). One might surmise that the tonic leak conductance introduced by Kv7.4 would shunt input power and reduce efficiency. This is precisely the expected occurrence at low frequencies when IKn serves as the leak current (Fig. 6H). However, as the stress acting on the channel begins to shift, the mechanosensitive current causes the efficiency to reach nearly 80% (Fig. 6, G and H, ωd), a value perhaps higher than any known biological motor and predicted to be more than double the efficiency of an OHC lacking Kv7.4 mechanosensitivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The Animal Care and Ethical Committee of the University of Nevada, Reno approved the use of animals in this study. OHCs from equal numbers of male and female C57BL/6 J mice (ages P4 to P48; the Jackson Laboratory) were used in an acutely dissected organ of Corti. The tissue was mounted under an insect pin glued to a coverslip for electrophysiological recordings.
Dissection of the organ of Corti
The organ of Corti was dissected from equal numbers of male and female postnatal (P4 to P48) C57BL/6 J mice cochlea. Mice were euthanized, and the temporal bones were removed for further dissection in standard extracellular solution, which contained 144 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM NaHPO4, 5.8 mM KCl, 0.9 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 1.3 mM CaCl2, and 5.6 mM glucose (pH was adjusted to 7.4). Amino acids and vitamins for Eagle’s minimal essential medium were added from concentrates (Invitrogen). The bone surrounding the cochlea was dissected away; the stria vascularis, lateral cochlear wall, and tectorial membrane were removed. The cochlear explant was transferred to a chamber on an upright microscope (Olympus BX50WI, 60× WI objective) for electrophysiological experiments.
Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of OHCs
Cochlear epithelia were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for ~30 min at 4°C and then washed three times with PBS for 5 min. After being treated with 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min, the tissues were washed and treated with −20°C methanol for 10 min and then washed and treated with antibody [1:100 dilution for anti-Kv7.4 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1:100 for anti-myosin 7A (Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies]. Immunofluorescence-labeled samples were examined by using Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning microscopy. To ascertain, in double or triple staining, that there was no overlap between the detection of the fluorochromes, singly labeled OHCs were imaged under identical conditions to those used for dual/triple-labeled probes to confirm proper signal isolation of each channel. Control experiments performed by preincubation of the primary antibody with the respective antigenic peptide (1:1) did not show positive staining under the same experimental conditions used. Identical settings were used for all specimens. Z-stack sections were collected, and 2/3/4-D static and motion images were reconstructed offline using image visualization and analysis software (Imaris, Bitplane, Oxford Instruments).
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings
Patch-clamp experiments were performed in standard whole-cell configurations using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Patch pipettes had a resistance of 1 to 2 megohms when filled with an internal solution consisting of 142 mM KCl, 5 mM Hepes, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 3.5 mM MgCl2, and 2.5 mM MgATP (pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH). The extracellular solution consisted of 144 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM NaHPO4, 5.8 mM KCl, 0.9 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 1.3 mM CaCl2, and 5.6 mM glucose (pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH). Amino acids and vitamins for Eagle’s minimal essential medium were added from concentrates (Invitrogen). Experiments were performed at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 20° to 37°C using a bipolar temperature controller (Warner Instruments). Currents were sampled at 50 or 20 kHz and filtered at 5 or 2 kHz with a 16-bit A/D converter (Digidata 1322A, Axon Instruments). Liquid junction potentials were measured (2.1 ± 0.7 mV, n = 89) and corrected online. Access resistance in series with the recording electrode was measured and compensated >90%, and recording from OHCs with voltage errors greater than 2 mV were discarded from analyses. The stock solutions of lino (Sigma-Aldrich) were made in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −20°C. The final concentration of DMSO in the recording bath solution was 0.0001%. This concentration of DMSO had no effects on outward currents.
For whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings made in transfected HEK 293 cells, the bath solution contained the following: 145 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Hepes, and 10 mM glucose (pH 7.4 with NaOH). The pipettes were filled with a solution consisting of 112 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Hepes, 5 mM K2ATP, and 0.5 mM Na2GTP (pH 7.35 with KOH).
Gating current recordings
Gating currents were recorded from HEK 293 cells transfected with EGFP, CRY2-mCherry, CIBN-EGFP-Kv7.4, and CRY2-mCherry, using pipette solution containing 145 mM TEAOH, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 7 mM TEACl, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.25 with glutamic acid). The external solution consisted of 145 mM TEAOH, 3 mM BaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Hepes, and 5 mM glucose (pH 7.4 with glutamic acid). Experiments were performed under pre– and post–blue-light illumination (see below). Gating currents were elicited using ~5-ms voltage steps from −100 to 60 mV in 10-mV increments. Current outputs were low-pass–filtered at 1 kHz and acquired at 20 kHz. Experiments were performed using Clampex 8 (Axon Instruments) acquisition software. Leak subtraction was performed based on a P/7 protocol.
Cryptochrome-mediated Kv7.4 clusters and immunofluorescence in HEK 293 cells
pCIBN-pmGFP (#26867) and CRY2olig-mCherry (#60032) plasmids were purchased from Addgene. To generate pCIBN-EGFP–(flexible linker)–Kv7.4 clone, pCIBN-pmGFP was linearized by Age I and Eco RI restriction enzymes, and the pmGFP segment was removed. Polymerase chain reaction–generated EGFP and Kv7.4 fragments overlapping homologous sequences at the ends were assembled to the vector by using the Choo-Choo cloning system (MCLAB, CA), under the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer sequences to generate the fragments are listed below. EGFP with a flexible linker (SRGGSGGSGGSGGSGGRS): 5-EGFP-GGA TTA TAT TCA TGT ACC GGT CGC CAC CAT GGT GAG CAA and 3-EGFP-GCT GCG GCC GCC GCT GCC GCC GCT GCC GCC GCT GCC GCC GCT GCC GCC GCG GCT ACC CTT ATA CAG CTC GTC were used. For Kv7.4 fragment: 5-Q4 AGC GGC GGC CGC AGC ATG GCC GAG GCC CCT CCC and 3-Q4 G TCG ACT GCA GAA TTC TCA GTC CAT GTT GGT GGA CAC. The clone was verified by sequencing.
HEK 293 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 following the protocol of the manufacturer, and 1 μg of total DNA per 35-mm dish was used.
We used an optogenetic light-induced protein cluster system based on CRY2 and CIB1 proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana (17) to mediate Kv7.4 clusters. Cells were cotransfected with the N-terminal region of CIB1 (EGFP-CIBN) and mCherry-CRY2 at a 1:1 molar ratio. Thirty-six to 48 hours after transfection, cells were illuminated with blue light, which promotes binding of CRY2 to the CIBN to mediate Kv7.4 clusters. Control experiments were conducted to determine whether the fusion channel protein, EGFP-CIBN-Kv7.4, has functional properties similar to those of Kv7.4 channel alone (fig. S2).
Confocal microscopy and FRAP
HEK 293 cells were transfected with CRY2olig-mCherry and CIBN-Kv7.4-EGFP using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Live cells were imaged using a 63× oil objective on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal laser scanning microscope. All cells were selected without exposure to blue light. Baseline images were taken with rapid exposure times (less than 4 s per frame) to measure baseline intensity and limit excitation before the experiment. For FRAP experiments, cells were excited with blue light; mCherry and EGFP emissions were collected over time. Imaging and analyses were performed using Zen 2009, ImageJ, and Imaris software. All analyses were performed in a blinded fashion.
FRAP experiments were performed at room temperature (~21°C) with a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope and MultiTime software. Regions of interest (ROIs) were randomly selected from the cell membrane. The time course of colocalization of EGFP and mCherry, as a correlate for channel clusters, was determined by comparing data from before and after blue-light illumination. Pre- and postbleach images were acquired using laser beam scanning once every 10 s with the 568-nm excitation wavelength. For photobleaching, the laser was set to 100% transmission. The fluorescence intensity was measured in the bleached area as a function of time (t), and mean background values were determined outside the ROI and subtracted from all intensity data points before further analysis to correct overall photobleaching. The average fluorescence intensity within bleached ROIs was normalized to prebleach intensity for each time point. Experiments were performed on a Zeiss microscope swept field confocal system equipped with a 488-nm laser line and a Plan Apo 63× 1.45 numerical aperture oil immersion objective.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, K+ currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode. Two to 3 min after initiating electrical access to transfected HEK 293 cells, cells were exposed to a blue-light pulse at different exposure times to induce Kv7.4 clusters. In HEK 293 cells, K+ currents were recorded before and after blue-light illumination in response to 2-s depolarizing pulse from a holding voltage of −70 mV to voltages ranging from −120 to 60 mV, using 10-mV increments.
Antibodies
The following primary antibodies were used: (i) anti-Kv7.4 antibody (Alomone, APC-164), a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against a purified peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 594 to 607 of mouse Kv7.4 located at the C terminus, and (ii) anti-myosin 7A antibody (Proteus BioSciences, 25-6790). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham), anti-rabbit peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam), goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG)–Cy3 conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 111-095-045), goat polyclonal antibodies to mouse IgG-Cy3 conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 111-165-003), donkey anti-goat IgG–fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 705-095-147), and goat anti-rabbit IgG-Cy3 conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 11-165-045).
Data analysis
All data analyses were performed offline with Clampfit 8 (Axon Instruments) and Microcal Origin (OriginLab, version 8). The number of animals and cells used are indicated in the figure legends. Current magnitudes were measured using averages of the steady-state, tail (deactivation), and peak level detection routine in the pClamp software. Whole-cell K+ currents were normalized and plotted against the step potential. Continuous curves were generated from the Boltzmann function I/Imax = (1 + (exp(V1/2 − V)/km)), where V1/2 is the half-activation voltage, km = RT/zF is the slope factor, 1/km is the voltage sensitivity at half-activation, I is the magnitude of the current, and Imax denotes the maximum current size. Gating currents were derived from the integral between 0 and 600 μs after the test voltage (V) to determine the net charge (Q) movement. Q-V relationships were fit with a Boltzmann function: Q = Qmax/(1 − exp.(−zF(V – V1/2)/RT)), where Qmax is the maximum charge, z is the voltage dependence of activation, V1/2 is the half-activation voltage, T is the absolute room temperature (294 K), F is Faraday’s constant, and R is the universal gas constant. Qmax, V1/2, and z were determined by using the iterative process in Origin software. The lateral surface area of OHCs was calculated as described previously (35). We assumed OHC cell shape as a cylinder with length l and a hemisphere of diameter d. The estimated lateral surface area (S) was computed as S = πd(l − d/2). Statistical analysis was performed using a paired or unpaired t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with significance taken as P < 0.05.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank members of our laboratory, J. Hudspeth, J. Santos-Sacchi, W. Brownell, M. Sanguinetti, J. Holt, H. von Gersdoff, L. Trussell, and I. Russell for constructive and supportive comments on this manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the NIH, including NIH R01 DC016099, NIH R01 DC015135, NIH R01 DC015252, NIH P01 AG051443, and NIH R01 AG060504 to E.N.Y.; NIH R01 DC006685 to R.D.R.; NIH R01 HL085727, NIH R01 HL085844, NIH R01 HL137228, and VA Merit Review Grants I01 BX000576 and I01 CX001490 to N.C.; and NIH R56 HL138392 to X.-D.Z. H.A.L. was supported by Predoctoral Fellowship from NIH/NHLBI Institutional Training Grant in Basic and Translational Cardiovascular Science NIH T32 HL086350 and NIH F31 HL136120 Predoctoral Awards. Author contributions: E.N.Y., R.D.R., N.C., and H.J.K. designed the research; M.C.P.-F., J.H.L., S.P., X.-D.Z., W.W., C.-R.S., H.A.L., V.Y.-Y., N.C., R.D.R., H.J.K., and E.N.Y. performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; and M.C.P.-F., J.H.L., S.P., X.-D.Z., W.W., C.-R.S., V.T., H.J.K., V.Y.-Y., N.C., R.D.R., and E.N.Y. performed quantitative analyses of the project. In addition, R.D.R. wrote the code for the simulation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Carr C. E., Köppl C., Coding interaural time differences at low best frequencies in the barn owl. J. Physiol. Paris 98, 99–112 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brownell W. E., Bader C. R., Bertrand D., de Ribaupierre Y., Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 227, 194–196 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Frank G., Hemmert W., Gummer A. W., Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 4420–4425 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cooper N. P., Vavakou A., van der Heijden M., Vibration hotspots reveal longitudinal funneling of sound-evoked motion in the mammalian cochlea. Nat. Commun. 9, 3054 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Santos-Sacchi J., Iwasa K. H., Tan W., Outer hair cell electromotility is low-pass filtered relative to the molecular conformational changes that produce nonlinear capacitance. J. Gen. Physiol. 151, 1369–1385 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Santos-Sacchi J., Tan W., The frequency response of outer hair cell voltage-dependent motility is limited by kinetics of prestin. J. Neurosci. 38, 5495–5506 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng J., Shen W., He D. Z. Z., Long K. B., Madison L. D., Dallos P., Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 405, 149–155 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hudspeth A. J., The cellular basis of hearing: The biophysics of hair cells. Science 230, 745–752 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ricci A. J., Kennedy H. J., Crawford A. C., Fettiplace R., The transduction channel filter in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 25, 7831–7839 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mountain D. C., Hubbard A. E., A piezoelectric model of outer hair cell function. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 350–354 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davis H., An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 9, 79–90 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kemp D. T., Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386–1391 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Johnson S. L., Beurg M., Marcotti W., Fettiplace R., Prestin-driven cochlear amplification is not limited by the outer hair cell membrane time constant. Neuron 70, 1143–1154 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marcotti W., Kros C. J., Developmental expression of the potassium current IK,n contributes to maturation of mouse outer hair cells. J. Physiol. 520, 653–660 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kharkovets T., Dedek K., Maier H., Schweizer M., Khimich D., Nouvian R., Vardanyan V., Leuwer R., Moser T., Jentsch T. J., Mice with altered KCNQ4 K+ channels implicate sensory outer hair cells in human progressive deafness. EMBO J. 25, 642–652 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Taslimi A., Vrana J. D., Chen D., Borinskaya S., Mayer B. J., Kennedy M. J., Tucker C. L., An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function. Nat. Commun. 5, 4925 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kennedy M. J., Hughes R. M., Peteya L. A., Schwartz J. W., Ehlers M. D., Tucker C. L., Rapid blue-light–mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 7, 973–975 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dixon R. E., Yuan C., Cheng E. P., Navedo M. F., Santana L. F., Ca2+ signaling amplification by oligomerization of L-type Cav1.2 channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1749–1754 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gomez-Casati M. E., Katz E., Glowatzki E., Lioudyno M. I., Fuchs P., Elgoyhen A. B., Linopirdine blocks α9α10-containing nicotinic cholinergic receptors of cochlear hair cells. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5, 261–269 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leitner M. G., Feuer A., Ebers O., Schreiber D. N., Halaszovich C. R., Oliver D., Restoration of ion channel function in deafness-causing KCNQ4 mutants by synthetic channel openers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 165, 2244–2259 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim H. J., Lv P., Sihn C.-R., Yamoah E. N., Cellular and molecular mechanisms of autosomal dominant form of progressive hearing loss, DFNA2. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 1517–1527 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yifrach O., MacKinnon R., Energetics of pore opening in a voltage-gated K+ channel. Cell 111, 231–239 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chambard J.-M., Ashmore J. F., Regulation of the voltage-gated potassium channel KCNQ4 in the auditory pathway. Pflügers Arch. 450, 34–44 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eyring H., The activated complex in chemical reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 107–115 (1935). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rabbitt R. D., Clifford S., Breneman K. D., Farrell B., Brownell W. E., Power efficiency of outer hair cell somatic electromotility. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000444 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ó Maoiléidigh D., Hudspeth A. J., Effects of cochlear loading on the motility of active outer hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 5474–5479 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao S. S., Wang R., Raphael P. D., Moayedi Y., Groves A. K., Zuo J., Applegate B. E., Oghalai J. S., Vibration of the organ of Corti within the cochlear apex in mice. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 1192–1204 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim G. E., Kaczmarek L. K., Emerging role of the KCNT1 Slack channel in intellectual disability. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 209 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moreno C. M., Dixon R. E., Tajada S., Yuan C., Opitz-Araya X., Binder M. D., Santana L. F., Ca2+ entry into neurons is facilitated by cooperative gating of clustered CaV1.3 channels. eLife 5, e15744 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dekker J. P., Yellen G., Cooperative gating between single HCN pacemaker channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 128, 561–567 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jagger D. J., Ashmore J. F., Regulation of ionic currents by protein kinase A and intracellular calcium in outer hair cells isolated from the guinea-pig cochlea. Pflügers Arch. 437, 409–416 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gold T., Hearing. II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 135, 492–498 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ashmore J., Biophysics of the cochlea—Biomechanics and ion channelopathies. Br. Med. Bull. 63, 59–72 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neely S. T., Kim D. O., A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1472–1480 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Belyantseva I. A., Frolenkov G. I., Wade J. B., Mammano F., Kachar B., Water permeability of cochlear outer hair cells: Characterization and relationship to electromotility. J. Neurosci. 20, 8996–9003 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Santos-Sacchi J., Reversible inhibition of voltage-dependent outer hair cell motility and capacitance. J. Neurosci. 11, 3096–3110 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.R. Latorre, G. Vargas, G. Orta, S. Brauchi, Voltage and temperature gating of thermoTRP channels, in TRP Ion Channel Function in Sensory Transduction and Cellular Signaling Cascades, W. Liedtke, S. Heller, Eds. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2007), chap. 21. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang F., Zheng J., High temperature sensitivity is intrinsic to voltage-gated potassium channels. eLife 3, e03255 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang W. Y., Gruebele M., Folding at the speed limit. Nature 423, 193–197 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rabbitt R. D., Brichta A. M., Tabatabaee H., Boutros P. J., Ahn J., Della Santina C. C., Poppi L. A., Lim R., Heat pulse excitability of vestibular hair cells and afferent neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 825–843 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.