Skip to main content
Light, Science & Applications logoLink to Light, Science & Applications
. 2020 Apr 9;9:55. doi: 10.1038/s41377-020-0287-y

Low-loss metasurface optics down to the deep ultraviolet region

Cheng Zhang 1,2,3,✉,#, Shawn Divitt 2,3,#, Qingbin Fan 4,#, Wenqi Zhu 2,3, Amit Agrawal 2,3, Yanqing Lu 4, Ting Xu 4,, Henri J Lezec 2,
PMCID: PMC7142140  PMID: 32284857

Abstract

Shrinking conventional optical systems to chip-scale dimensions will benefit custom applications in imaging, displaying, sensing, spectroscopy, and metrology. Towards this goal, metasurfaces—planar arrays of subwavelength electromagnetic structures that collectively mimic the functionality of thicker conventional optical elements—have been exploited at frequencies ranging from the microwave range up to the visible range. Here, we demonstrate high-performance metasurface optical components that operate at ultraviolet wavelengths, including wavelengths down to the record-short deep ultraviolet range, and perform representative wavefront shaping functions, namely, high-numerical-aperture lensing, accelerating beam generation, and hologram projection. The constituent nanostructured elements of the metasurfaces are formed of hafnium oxide—a loss-less, high-refractive-index dielectric material deposited using low-temperature atomic layer deposition and patterned using high-aspect-ratio Damascene lithography. This study opens the way towards low-form factor, multifunctional ultraviolet nanophotonic platforms based on flat optical components, enabling diverse applications including lithography, imaging, spectroscopy, and quantum information processing.

Subject terms: Metamaterials, Integrated optics

Nanopillars that manipulate UV light

An array of hafnium oxide nanopillars on a fused silica substrate efficiently manipulates a broad range of ultraviolet light wavelengths, with potential applications in photolithography, imaging, spectroscopy, and quantum information processing. A resist-based Damascene process was developed by a team led by Cheng Zhang, Ting Xu and Henri J. Lezec in China and the USA. They used lithography to design spaces into a resist template that were then filled with hafnium oxide. The resist was removed with solvent to leave high-aspect-ratio hafnium oxide nanopillars. The pillar height, diameter and orientation, as well as the spacing between the pillars, control how UV light propagates through the thin ‘metasurface’. Metasurfaces were used to focus UV light like a lens; transform incident UV light into a propagating, curving output beam; and generate holograms from three UV light wavelengths.

Introduction

An optical metasurface is a planar array of subwavelength electromagnetic structures that emulate the operation of a conventional refractive, birefringent, or diffractive optical component, such as a lens, waveplate, or hologram, through individually tailored amplitude, phase, or polarization transformations of the incident light19. Dielectric materials such as amorphous Si10,11, polycrystalline Si12, titanium dioxide (TiO2)13,14, and gallium nitride (GaN)15,16 have been used to realize metasurfaces operating at infrared and visible frequencies. The scarcity of dielectric materials that are characterized by low optical loss at higher frequencies and simultaneously amenable to high-aspect-ratio nanopatterning has impeded the development of metasurfaces for applications in the ultraviolet (UV) range, a technologically important spectral regime hosting diverse applications in lithography, imaging, spectroscopy, time keeping, and quantum information processing1719. To date, metasurfaces designed for operation in the near-UV range (UV-A; free-space wavelength range: 315 nm ≤ λ0 ≤ 380 nm; energy range: 3.26 eV ≤ E0 ≤ 3.94 eV) have been implemented using niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5), down to an operation free-space wavelength of λ0 = 355 nm20. Crystalline Si has been used to realize metasurfaces operating down to λ0 = 290 nm21, a wavelength that falls within the mid-UV range (UV-B; 280 nm ≤ λ0 ≤ 315 nm; 3.94 eV ≤ E0 ≤ 4.43 eV), but the device efficiencies remain limited by the severe absorption loss associated with illumination frequencies above the bandgap of Si (Eg ≈ 1.1 eV). In both studies, the demonstrated functionalities are limited to hologram generation and beam deflection, while other important wavefront shaping functionalities that can be empowered by optical metasurfaces, such as high-numerical-aperture focusing and structured beam generation, have not yet been achieved. Meanwhile, metasurfaces that can operate at even higher frequencies, such as within the deep-UV range (longer wavelength portion of UV-C; 190 nm ≤ λ0 ≤ 280 nm; 4.43 eV ≤ E0 ≤ 6.53 eV), have not been realized due to the challenge of identifying a dielectric material that has a suitably low optical absorption coefficient in that range and can be patterned into high-aspect-ratio nanostructures using the available nanofabrication techniques.

Here, we report high-performance dielectric metasurfaces that operate over a broad UV range, including within the record-short, deep-UV regime, and perform representative wavefront shaping functionalities. The constituent nanostructured elements of the metasurfaces are formed of hafnium oxide (HfO2)—a UV-transparent, high-refractive-index dielectric material. Although HfO2 has been commonly exploited as a high-static-dielectric-constant (high-κ) material in integrated circuit fabrication22,23, its applications in photonics have largely been limited to optical coatings based on planar thin films, in particular due to the difficulty of patterning the material into high-aspect-ratio nanostructures. In this work, we overcome this limitation and use HfO2, for the first time, to implement meta-devices operating in the UV and deep-UV regimes. We deposit high-quality, UV-transparent HfO2 films using low-temperature atomic layer deposition (ALD) and pattern the films using a high-aspect ratio, resist-based Damascene lithography technique2426. We implement metasurfaces designed for operation at three representative UV wavelengths of 364, 325, and 266 nm, which perform a variety of optical functions, namely, high-numerical-aperture lensing, accelerating beam generation, and hologram projection, including under spin control for the last two applications. This achievement opens the way for low-form-factor and multifunctional photonic systems based on UV flat optics, and suggests promising applications in photolithography, high-resolution imaging, UV spectroscopy and quantum information processing.

Results

Material choice and fabrication approach

The implemented metasurface devices consist of HfO2 nanopillars of either circular or elliptical in-plane cross-sections (Fig. 1a), densely arrayed on a transparent UV-grade fused silica substrate with a low refractive index (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1). The choice of HfO2—a material most commonly exploited for its high static dielectric constant as a transistor gate insulator in complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) integrated circuits—is guided by the promise of both a large refractive index (n > 2.1 for λ0 < 400 nm) and a wide bandgap Eg = 5.7 eV (λg = 217 nm) located well within the deep-UV range, leading to a negligible extinction coefficient (k ≈ 0) for λ0 ≥ λg. Although the requirement of nanopillar dimensions with a wavelength-scale height (several hundred nanometers), a subwavelength-scale in-plane circle diameter or ellipse minor axis (few tens of nanometers), and vertical sidewalls suggest that pattern transfer with a directional dry-etching technique such as reactive ion etching would be optimal, we were unable to identify a suitable high-aspect-ratio, dry-etching chemistry for HfO2 (a material commonly patterned by nondirectional wet chemical etching27). We instead explore the use of Damascene lithography2426 for HfO2 metasurface fabrication, a process that involves first patterning resist using electron beam (e-beam) lithography, conformally filling the open volumes of the resist template with HfO2 using ALD, back-etching the over-coated HfO2 layer using argon (Ar) ion milling, and finally removing the remaining resist with solvent to form the required high-aspect-ratio nanopillars (see “Materials and methods”).

Fig. 1. Implementation of ultraviolet metasurfaces.

Fig. 1

a Schematic representation of a metasurface unit cell, consisting of a high-aspect-ratio HfO2 pillar with height H, an elliptical cross-section (principle axis lengths D1 and D2), and rotation angle θ, arranged on a SiO2 substrate to form a square lattice with a subwavelength lattice spacing P. Specific optical functions are implemented via the variation in D1, D2, and θ as a function of the nanopillar position within the lattice. b Schematic representation of the developed low-temperature ALD cycle using the TDMAH precursor, H2O reactant, and a process temperature of Tp = 95 °C. c Refractive index n and extinction coefficient k of the as-deposited HfO2 film, measured using spectroscopic ellipsometry. The values of n at the three operation wavelengths targeted in this study are denoted by yellow stars. The dashed line indicates the position of the HfO2 bandgap Eg. d Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the details of a fabricated polarization-independent metalens designed for operation at λ0 = 325 nm, showing a lattice of 500 nm tall, circularly shaped HfO2 nanopillars with various diameters. The viewing angle is 52°. e SEM image of the details of a fabricated spin-multiplexed metahologram designed for operation at λ0 = 266 nm, showing a lattice of 480 nm tall, elliptically shaped HfO2 nanopillars with various in-plane cross-sections and rotation angles. The viewing angle is 52°. The nanopillars are coated with a layer of Au/Pd alloy (≈5 nm thick) to suppress charging during SEM imaging. f Optical micrographs of the full metalens (top panel) and spin-multiplexed metahologram (bottom panel) corresponding to the metasurfaces described in d, e, respectively. Scale bars: 100 µm

The preservation of the physical integrity of the resist template requires the use of a plasma-free thermal ALD process with a process temperature, Tp, lower than the glass transition temperature (reflow temperature) of the utilized resist, Tg, along with a process chemistry involving by-products that are not corrosive to the resist. Fulfilling both process tolerance requirements rules out the use of common Hf precursors such as Tetrakis(ethylmethylamino)Hafnium (TEMAH)28, for which the minimum Tp (≈150 °C) is significantly higher than the Tg of common e-beam resists, or hafnium chloride (HfCl4)29, for which the reaction by-product (HCl) attacks the resist. Instead, we investigate Tetrakis(dimethylamino)Hafnium (TDMAH)30 as an alternative Hf precursor for thermal ALD of high-optical-quality HfO2, using a Tp below the Tg of common e-beam organic resists (such as ZEP, for which Tg ≈ 105 °C). To avoid the risk of incomplete reaction cycles and the physical condensation of precursors associated with low-temperature ALD (yielding films with defects and voids, and hence, degraded sub-bandgap optical properties, such as a reduced refractive index n and finite extinction coefficient k), an existing ALD process which uses TDMAH and H2O precursors and operates at Tp = 200 °C is modified (Fig. 1b) by (1) decreasing the process temperature to Tp = 95 °C; (2) increasing the TDMAH pulsing time, t1, from 0.25 to 1 s to enable a complete reaction with the OH monolayer resulting from the previous cycle; and (3) increasing the N2 purging times, t2 and t4, from 12 to 75 s to ensure full removal of the excessive precursors and reaction byproducts (see “Materials and methods”). As revealed by X-ray diffraction characterization (Supplementary Information, Section II) and spectroscopic ellipsometry measurements (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Information, Section III), HfO2 films deposited using the modified low-temperature ALD process are amorphous and characterized by a high refractive index (n > 2.1) and negligible optical loss (k ≈ 0) over a UV wavelength interval 220 nm ≤ λ0 ≤ 380 nm spanning the full mid-UV and near-UV ranges and more than half of the deep-UV range. The measured wavelength dependences of n and k closely match those of a film grown using the 200 °C reference ALD process (Supplementary Information, Fig. S4), demonstrating that the optical quality of the deposited HfO2 can be maintained at significantly lower ALD process temperatures with a suitable Hf precursor and a proper adjustment of the pulsing and purging times. Note that the 95 °C-ALD-deposited HfO2 films exhibit a high refractive index (n > 2.0) and zero optical loss (k = 0) in the visible range (380 nm ≤ λ0 ≤ 800 nm), making the films suitable for the fabrication of low-loss metasurface devices in this wavelength range as well (Supplementary Information, Fig. S5).

Using ZEP resist for e-beam lithography and the low-temperature TDMAH-based ALD process for the HfO2 deposition, the proposed Damascene fabrication process is applied to yield defect-free metasurfaces, each consisting of a large array of densely packed HfO2 nanopillars on a UV-grade fused silica substrate (Fig. 1f). The nanopillars have uniform heights, circular (Fig. 1d), or elliptical (Fig. 1e) in-plane cross sections, and are characterized by straight, vertical, and smooth sidewalls (Fig. 1d, e, and Supplementary Information, Figs. S7S11). The nanopillar rotation angle and two principle axis lengths in the plane of the metasurfaces (θ, D1, and D2, respectively, where θ = 0 and D1 = D2 = D in the case of a circular cross-section) vary as a function of the nanopillar position (with 0 ≤ θ < π and 50 nm ≤ (D1, D2) ≤ 160 nm) depending on the optical function implemented by the metasurface. The nanopillar height H varies depending on the operation wavelength of the metasurface (400 nm ≤ H ≤ 550 nm).

We first demonstrate lenses, self-accelerating beam generators, and holograms based on polarization-independent metasurfaces consisting of nanopillars with in-plane circular cross-sections, that operate at near-UV wavelengths of 364 and 325 nm (corresponding to emission lines of argon-ion and helium–cadmium lasers, respectively) with efficiencies up to 72%. Further exploiting the high patterning fidelity of the Damascene technique and leveraging the negligible optical loss of the as-deposited HfO2 dielectric material across most of the UV regime, we scale down the metasurface critical dimensions to realize polarization-independent holograms operating at a deep-UV wavelength of 266 nm (corresponding to the emission line of an optical parametric oscillator pumped by a nanosecond Q-switched Nd:YAG laser), with relatively high efficiencies (>60%). Finally, by opening up the design space with the three degrees of freedom provided by elliptically shaped nanopillars (θ, D1, and D2), compared to the single degree of freedom provided by circularly shaped nanopillars (D), we realize spin-multiplexed metasurfaces that impart independent phase shift profiles onto light emerging from the device under illumination with left-handed circularly polarized (LCP) or right-handed circularly polarized (RCP) light. The implemented self-accelerating beam generators and spin-multiplexed metaholograms operate at UV wavelengths of 364 and 266 nm, respectively, with efficiencies up to 61%.

Polarization-independent UV metasurfaces

Each polarization-independent metasurface implemented in this study (lens, self-accelerating beam generator, and hologram) consists of a square lattice of HfO2 cylindrical nanopillars, where the diameter of each pillar varies as a function of its position within the lattice. Each nanopillar acts as a truncated dielectric waveguide with top and bottom interfaces of low reflectivity, through which light propagates with a transmittance and phase shift controlled by the pillar height H, pillar diameter D, and lattice spacing P. For each targeted operation wavelength (λ0 = 364, 325, and 266 nm), a corresponding pillar height (H = 550, 500, and 400 nm, respectively) and subwavelength lattice spacing (P = 200, 190, and 150 nm, respectively) are chosen, along with a range of pillar diameters that yield phase shifts varying over a full range of 2π, while maintaining a relatively high and constant transmittance ([50, 160 nm], [50, 150 nm], and [50, 110 nm], respectively). The detailed design procedure is elaborated in Supplementary Information, Section VIII.

As a first demonstration of polarization-independent UV metasurfaces, two 500-µm-diameter, polarization-independent metalens designs, L364 and L325, with an identical numerical aperture of NA = 0.6 (corresponding to a focal length of f = 330 μm), are implemented to focus UV light at respective free-space wavelengths of λ0 = 364 and 325 nm (Fig. 2a). Singlet-mode focusing of a plane wave can be achieved by implementing the radially symmetric phase shift function φL(x,y,λ0)=mod((2π/λ0)(fx2+y2+f2),2π), where f is the focal distance normal to the plane of the lens (along the z direction), x and y are in-plane distances along orthogonal directions from the center of the lens, and normal incidence is assumed. Each measured intensity distribution at the metalens focal plane (Supplementary Information, Section IX) reveals a circularly symmetric focal spot, characterized by a cross-section that closely matches the intensity distribution theoretically predicted for a diffraction-limited lens with a numerical aperture of NA = 0.6 and given by the Airy disk function Ix=2J1(A)A2, where J1 is the Bessel function of the first kind of order one, and A=2πNAxλ0 (Fig. 2b, c). Metalens L325 exhibits a less-than-ideal focusing profile with larger side lobes, which could be due to fabrication imperfections and a nonideal realization of the required phase shift profile. The focusing efficiencies, defined as the ratio of the optical power of the focused spot to the total power illuminating the metalens, are (55.17 ± 2.56)% (L364) and (56.28 ± 1.37)% (L325). The cited uncertainties represent one standard deviation of the measured data.

Fig. 2. Polarization-independent near-UV metalenses.

Fig. 2

a Schematic representation of focusing by a metalens, L364 or L325, under normal-incidence, plane-wave illumination at λ0 = 364 or 325 nm, respectively. b, c Cross-focus cuts and intensity distributions in the focal plane, as measured for metalenses L364 and L325, respectively. The theoretically predicted cross-focus cuts are plotted for reference. Scale bars: 1 µm

Next, we demonstrate polarization-independent metasurfaces that can transform a normally incident plane wave into a diffraction-free output beam propagating along a curved trajectory, i.e., a self-accelerating beam (SAB)3133. Two 270-µm-square SAB generator designs, B364 and B325, are implemented for operation at the respective wavelengths of 364 and 325 nm (Fig. 3a). The SAB generator design and operation are conveniently described using a Cartesian coordinate system in which the constituent metasurface is located in the z = 0 plane and the first xy quadrant, with one corner positioned at the origin. The implemented SAB for each targeted free-space wavelength, λ0 = 364 and 325 nm, is characterized by an L-shaped wave-packet of the main lobe centered on the trajectory y=x=az2, where a = 9 m−1 (in other words, originating from (0, 0, 0) and propagating in the +z direction in a curved trajectory confined to the plane y = x with a height above the surface given by z=da, where d=x=y is the lateral displacement). The targeted SAB can be generated by implementing a phase shift profile φBx,y,λ0=mod(8π3λ0a(x32+y32),2π) in the metasurface34. The measured lateral displacement values d(z) are observed to closely match, in each case, the calculated values based on the targeted trajectory (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Information, Section X). The experimental SAB generated by each device exhibits diffraction-free characteristics with xy-plane intensity distributions similar to the intensity distributions numerically computed using the angular spectrum representation method35, assuming an ideal metasurface realization with both the designed phase shift profile φB and unity transmittance T (Fig. 3c). The measured efficiencies, defined as the ratio of the total optical power of the SAB in the z = 5 mm plane to the total power illuminating the metasurface, are (46.75 ± 2.31)% (B364) and (67.42 ± 4.43)% (B325). The efficiencies compare favorably to that of a recently reported TiO2-based self-accelerating beam generator operating at visible frequencies36.

Fig. 3. Polarization-independent near-UV self-accelerating beam generators.

Fig. 3

a Schematic representation of the generation of a self-accelerating beam by a metasurface, B364 or B325, under normal-incidence, plane-wave illumination at λ0 = 364 or 325 nm, respectively. b Measured transverse deflection in different z planes (ranging from 2.5 to 5.5 mm, with an increment of 0.5 mm) for the illumination of B364 and B325, respectively, at respective operation wavelengths λ0 = 364 and 325 nm. The error bars denote one standard deviation of the measured data. The targeted beam trajectory, d=9z2, is shown for reference. c Measured and computed xy-plane intensity distributions (normalized) at different z planes for both devices at their designated wavelengths of operation. Each distribution is displayed over an equal square area with a side length of 120 µm but shifted along the −xy direction as a function of increasing z, such that the center of the main lobe maintains an invariant position within each image

As a final demonstration of polarization-independent UV metasurfaces, we demonstrate three metaholograms, denoted H364, H325, and H266, operating at three respective UV wavelengths λ0 = 364, 325, and 266 nm (Fig. 4a). Implementing computer-generated holograms with metasurfaces enables high-efficiency and low-noise operation, fine spatial resolution, a compact footprint, and multiplexing capability3740. Each demonstrated metahologram, which occupies a square area with a side length of 270 µm, is mapped to a Cartesian coordinate system in which the constituent metasurface is located in the z = 0 plane and the first xy quadrant, with one corner positioned at the origin. The Gerchberg–Saxton algorithm41 is employed to calculate the phase shift profiles, φ364H(x,y,λ0), φ325H(x,y,λ0), and φ266H(x,y,λ0), required to project a holographic “NIST” image located in the z = 40 mm plane, under normal-incidence, plane-wave illumination (Supplementary Information, Section XI). An additional offset of y = −3 mm is added to avoid overlap of the generated holographic image with the residual directly transmitted beam. The images projected by metaholograms H364, H325, and H266 are measured (Supplementary Information, Sections XII and XIII) and displayed in the right panel of Fig. 4b. Each of the experimental holographic images faithfully replicates the shape of the corresponding target image (left panel of Fig. 4b), numerically computed assuming an ideal metahologram realization with both the designed phase shift profile φH for a given operation wavelength and unity transmittance T. In addition, the speckle patterns filling the shapes of the measured images projected by metaholograms H364 and H325 exhibit numerous similarities with those of the corresponding target images; the as-measured holographic image projected by metahologram H366 does not offer the possibility of such a comparison due to the employed fluorescence transduction characterization scheme, which washes out the details of the speckle patterns. The measured efficiencies for metaholograms H364 and H325, defined as the ratio of the total optical power of the holographic image to the total power illuminating the structure, are (62.99 ± 4.14)% and (71.78 ± 2.06)%, respectively. The measured efficiency for metahologram H266, defined as the ratio of the total fluorescence power of the holographic image to the fluorescence power of the light illuminating the structure (Supplementary Information, Section XIII), is (60.67 ± 2.60)%. These efficiency values are comparable to those of recently reported TiO2-based metaholograms operating in the visible range26.

Fig. 4. Polarization-independent near-UV and deep-UV metaholograms.

Fig. 4

a Schematic representation of the holographic image projection by a metahologram, H364, H325, or H266, under normal-incidence, plane-wave illumination at λ0 = 364, 325, or 266 nm, respectively. b Targeted (left panel) and measured (right panel) holographic images projected by the metaholograms H364, H325, and H266 in the z = 40 mm plane

Spin-multiplexed UV metasurfaces

Metasurfaces have been demonstrated to switch between distinct optical outputs, such as different holographic images or differently oriented beams, under the control of the fundamental optical state of the input beam, e.g., polarization42,43, or a spatial feature of the input beam such as the angle of incidence44. Here, we demonstrate, for the first time, spin-multiplexed UV metasurfaces that can switch between distinct outputs depending on the handedness of the input light (left-hand circularly polarized, LCP, or right-hand circularly polarized, RCP). The detailed design procedure is elaborated in Supplementary Information, Section XIV.

As a first demonstration of a polarization-dependent, spin-multiplexed UV metasurface, we implement a self-accelerating beam generator operating at λ0 = 364 nm, denoted as B364spin, that generates SABs following different trajectories under the control of the handedness of circularly polarized incident light. The spin-multiplexed SAB generator, which occupies a square area with a side length of l = 330 µm, is referenced to a Cartesian coordinate system in which the constituent metasurface is located in the z = 0 plane and the first xy quadrant, with one corner positioned at the origin. Two distinct phase shift profiles, φLCPx,y,λ0=mod8π3λ016x32+y32,2π and φRCPx,y,λ0=mod8π3λ02.25lx32+ly32,2π, are targeted for the device operation to yield SABs exiting the metasurface from opposite corners and following different trajectories, y=x=d1=16z2 and yl=xl=d2=2.25z2, under LCP and RCP illuminations, respectively (Fig. 5a, d). The measured lateral displacement values, d1(z) and d2(z), are observed to closely match, in each case, the calculated values based on the targeted trajectory (Fig. 5c, d). The experimental SAB generated by the device exhibits diffraction-free characteristics with xy-plane intensity distributions (Fig. 5e, f) similar to the targeted intensity distributions (Supplementary Information, Figs. S14 and S15), numerically computed assuming an ideal metasurface realization with both the designed phase shift profile φLCP (φRCP) and unity transmittance T. The measured efficiency under LCP illumination (RCP illumination), defined as the ratio of the total optical power of the SAB in the z = 4.5 mm [z = 10.5 mm] plane to the total power illuminating the metasurface, is (38.42 ± 1.95)% [(61.90 ± 2.03)%]. The reduced efficiency under LCP illumination, compared to the RCP case, can be attributed to challenges associated with implementing a phase shift profile of a higher spatial gradient (Supplementary Information, Section XVI).

Fig. 5. Spin-multiplexed near-UV self-accelerating beam generator.

Fig. 5

a, b Schematic representation of the generation of a self-accelerating beam by the spin-multiplexed metasurface, B364spin, under normal-incidence, plane-wave LCP a or RCP b illumination at λ0 = 364 nm. c Measured transverse deflection in different z planes (ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 mm, with an increment of 0.5 mm) for LCP illumination of B364spin at its operation wavelength of λ0 = 364 nm. The error bars denote one standard deviation of the measured data. The targeted beam trajectory, d=16z2, is shown for reference. d Measured transverse deflection in different z planes (ranging from 4.5 to 10.5 mm, with an increment of 1.5 mm) for RCP illumination of B364spin at its operation wavelength of λ0 = 364 nm. The error bars denote one standard deviation of the measured data. The targeted beam trajectory, d=2.25z2, is shown for reference. e, f Measured xy-plane intensity distributions (normalized) in different z planes for the device at its designated wavelength of operation under either LCP illumination e or RCP illumination f. Each distribution is displayed over an equal square area with a side length of 140 µm but shifted along the −xy e or xy f direction as a function of increasing z, such that the center of the main lobe maintains an invariant position within each image

Next, we demonstrate a spin-controlled metahologram operating at the same near-UV wavelength of 364 nm. The 330-µm-square metahologram, H364spin, located in the z = 0 plane, is designed to project a holographic “NIST” image (for LCP illuminating light) and “NJU” image (for RCP illuminating light) at λ0 = 364 nm, all located in the xy-plane at z = 40 mm with an offset of y = −3 mm (Fig. 6a; the corresponding phase shift profiles are plotted in the Supplementary Information, Fig. S17). Both of the experimentally captured holographic images (Fig. 6b) faithfully replicate the shape of the corresponding targeted image computed from the designed phase profiles, including some fine grain details (Supplementary Information, Fig. S18). The measured efficiencies, defined as the ratio of the total optical power of the holographic image to the total power illuminating the metahologram, are (54.02 ± 2.22)% (under LCP illumination) and (53.76 ± 2.42)% (under RCP illumination), respectively.

Fig. 6. Spin-multiplexed near- and deep-UV metaholograms.

Fig. 6

a Schematic representation of the holographic image projection by the spin-multiplexed metahologram H364spin under LCP or RCP illumination at λ0 = 364 nm. b Measured holographic images projected by metahologram H364spin in the z = 40 mm plane under LCP illumination (top image) and RCP illumination (bottom image). c Schematic representation of the holographic image projection by the spin-multiplexed metahologram H266spin under LCP or RCP illumination at λ0 = 266 nm. d Measured holographic images projected by metahologram H266spin in the z = 40 mm plane under LCP illumination (top image) and RCP illumination (bottom image)

Finally, a spin-multiplexed metahologram, H266spin, occupying a square area with a side length of 320 µm, is implemented for operation at the deep-UV wavelength of 266 nm. The device, located in the z = 0 plane, is designed to project, at λ0 = 266 nm, a holographic “deep” image for LCP illumination and a holographic “UV” image for RCP illumination, where both images are located in the z = 40 mm plane with a lateral offset of y = −3 mm (Fig. 6c; the corresponding phase shift profiles are plotted in the Supplementary Information, Fig. S19). Each of the experimental holographic images (Fig. 6d) faithfully replicates the shape of the corresponding target image (Supplementary Information, Fig. S20), including subtle details of the chosen font, such as the linewidth variation and serif. The measured efficiencies, defined as the ratio of the total fluorescence power of the holographic image to the fluorescence power of light illuminating the structure, are (58.95 ± 1.95)% under LCP illumination and (61.23 ± 1.49)% under RCP illumination.

Discussion

Given the negligible extinction coefficient of the low-temperature-ALD deposited HfO2 down to its bandgap (λ0 ≈ 217 nm) and the high patterning fidelity of the Damascene process, it should be straightforward to push the metasurface operation wavelengths to significantly shorter values than those demonstrated here. In addition, an experimental demonstration of a broader range of device functionalities in the deep-UV regime other than hologram projection should be possible by using a continuous-wave light source and an appropriate direct imaging system. Moreover, the efficiency of HfO2-based metasurface devices can be improved by further optimizing the Damascene process or by employing advanced metasurface design strategies, such as topology optimization45 and the generalized Huygens principle46,47.

In conclusion, an assortment of high-performance metasurface components operating in the UV regime, including wavelengths down to the record-short deep-UV range, is demonstrated by using HfO2, a CMOS-compatible, wide-bandgap, and low-loss dielectric material, and an associated fabrication process based on low-temperature ALD and Damascene lithography. This approach paves the way towards further development of “flat” UV optical elements with customized functionalities and their integration into chip-scale nanophotonic systems, enabling applications such as atom trapping, fluorescence imaging, and circular dichroism spectroscopy with a compact form factor.

Materials and methods

Metasurface fabrication process

As the first step in the metasurface fabrication process, 500-µm-thick, double-side-polished UV-grade fused silica wafers are vapor-coated (150 °C) with an adhesion-enhancing monolayer of hexamethyldisilizane (HMDS). A layer of ZEP 520A resist is spin-coated onto the substrate, followed by baking on a hot plate at 180 °C for 10 min. The spin speed is adjusted to yield a resist thickness varying between 400 and 550 nm (as characterized by spectroscopic ellipsometry), depending on the specific metasurface design. To suppress charging during electron beam (e-beam) lithography, a 20-nm-thick Al layer is thermally evaporated onto the ZEP layer (deposition rate of 0.1 nm/s). The ZEP-resist template is fabricated using e-beam lithography (accelerating voltage of 100 kV and beam current of 0.2 nA), followed by Al layer removal (AZ 400 K 1:3 developer for 2 min and DI water for 1 min) and resist development (hexyl acetate for 2 min and isopropyl alcohol for 30 s). The deposition of HfO2 (deposition rate: 0.11 nm/cycle) is then performed using the low-temperature ALD described below. For all of the processed structures, the deposition thickness is chosen to be 200 nm, which not only exceeds the largest radius (or the largest semi-minor axis length) of the circular (or elliptical) openings of the exposed resist patterns for all metasurface designs, providing complete filling of the patterns, but also provides a substantial over-coating of the resist, yielding a quasi-planar top surface (Supplementary Information, Section VI). Following the ALD, the HfO2 layer is back-etched to the resist top surface using argon (Ar) ion milling (HfO2 mill rate of ≈0.4 nm/s). During the Ar ion milling, a non-patterned, planar HfO2 sample of the same initial thickness is also back-etched, and its film thickness is periodically monitored by spectroscopic ellipsometry to ensure that a proper milling time is employed. Finally, the remaining resist is removed by soaking in a solvent, yielding circular or elliptical HfO2 posts with smooth and straight sidewall profiles (due to the resist templating process), heights varying from 400 to 550 nm (depending on the specific metasurface), and aspect ratios varying from ≈3 to ≈11.

Low-temperature TDMAH-based HfO2 ALD

In step 1 of the ALD cycle, TDMAH vapor (Hf [(CH3)2N]4) is pulsed into the ALD chamber for a duration of t1 = 1 s, reacting with the dangling O–H bonds on the hafnium-coated surface to create a new solid monolayer of Hf(CH3)2N2O and generate the gas by-product (CH3)2NH (dimethylamine). In step 2, high-purity nitrogen (N2) gas is flowed for a duration of t2 = 75 s to fully remove any un-reacted TDMAH vapor and dimethylamine by-product from the chamber. In step 3, water vapor is pulsed into the chamber for a duration of t3 = 60 ms, reacting with the Hf[(CH3)2N]2O to create a monolayer of HfO2 on the surface. Finally, in step 4, the excessive water vapor and the dimethylamine reaction by-product are completely removed from the chamber by N2 purging for a duration of t4 = 75 s.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Q.F., Y.L., and T.X. acknowledge support from The National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0303700 and 2016YFA0202100) and the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11774163). C.Z., S.D., W.Z., and A.A. acknowledge support under the Cooperative Research Agreement between the University of Maryland and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Physical Measurement Laboratory, Award No. 70NANB14H209, through the University of Maryland. C.Z. acknowledges start-up funding from Huazhong University of Science and Technology and helpful discussions with Dr. Huazhi Li. Certain commercial equipment and software are identified in this documentation to describe the subject adequately. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the NIST, nor does it imply that the equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author contributions

The project was initiated by C.Z. The device fabrication and characterization were performed by C.Z., S.D., W.Z., and A.A. The simulations were performed by Q.F., S.D., C.Z. with further analysis by Y.L., T.X., and H.J.L. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results and participated in the manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally: Cheng Zhang, Shawn Divitt, Qingbin Fan

Contributor Information

Cheng Zhang, Email: cheng.zhang@hust.edu.cn.

Ting Xu, Email: xuting@nju.edu.cn.

Henri J. Lezec, Email: henri.lezec@nist.gov

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41377-020-0287-y.

References

  • 1.Yu NF, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:139–150. doi: 10.1038/nmat3839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hsiao HH, Chu CH, Tsai DP. Fundamentals and applications of metasurfaces. Small Methods. 2017;1:1600064. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201600064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kildishev AV, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science. 2013;339:1232009. doi: 10.1126/science.1232009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ding F, Pors A, Bozhevolnyi SI. Gradient metasurfaces: a review of fundamentals and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018;81:026401. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa8732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen HT, Taylor AJ, Yu NF. A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016;79:076401. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamali SM, et al. A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control. Nanophotonics. 2018;7:1041–1068. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2017-0129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang L, et al. Advances in full control of electromagnetic waves with metasurfaces. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016;4:818–833. doi: 10.1002/adom.201500690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun SL, et al. Electromagnetic metasurfaces: physics and applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics. 2019;11:380–479. doi: 10.1364/AOP.11.000380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luo XG. Subwavelength optical engineering with metasurface waves. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018;6:1701201. doi: 10.1002/adom.201701201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arbabi A, et al. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015;10:937–943. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin DM, et al. Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science. 2014;345:298–302. doi: 10.1126/science.1253213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Divitt S, et al. Ultrafast optical pulse shaping using dielectric metasurfaces. Science. 2019;364:890–894. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khorasaninejad M, et al. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science. 2016;352:1190–1194. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen WT, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13:220–226. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang SM, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13:227–232. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ren HR, et al. Metasurface orbital angular momentum holography. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2986. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11030-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Day RN, Davidson MW. The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:2887–2921. doi: 10.1039/b901966a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Greenfield NJ. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2876–2890. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ludlow AD, et al. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:637–701. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang K, et al. Ultraviolet metasurfaces of ≈80% efficiency with antiferromagnetic resonances for optical vectorial anti-counterfeiting. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019;13:1800289. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201800289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Deng Y, et al. All-silicon broadband ultraviolet metasurfaces. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1802632. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Robertson J. High dielectric constant oxides. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2004;28:265–291. doi: 10.1051/epjap:2004206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilk GD, Wallace RM, Anthony JM. High-κ gate dielectrics: current status and materials properties considerations. J. Appl. Phys. 2001;89:5243–5275. doi: 10.1063/1.1361065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andricacos PC, et al. Damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1998;42:567–574. doi: 10.1147/rd.425.0567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmid GM, et al. Implementation of an imprint damascene process for interconnect fabrication. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 2006;24:1283–1291. doi: 10.1116/1.2197508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Devlin RC, et al. Broadband high-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:10473–10478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611740113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lowalekar V, Raghavan S. Etching of zirconium oxide, hafnium oxide, and hafnium silicates in dilute hydrofluoric acid solutions. J. Mater. Res. 2011;19:1149–1156. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2004.0149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu XY, et al. ALD of hafnium oxide thin films from tetrakis(ethylmethylamino)hafnium and ozone. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005;152:G213–G219. doi: 10.1149/1.1859631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kukli K, et al. Comparison of hafnium oxide films grown by atomic layer deposition from iodide and chloride precursors. Thin Solid Films. 2002;416:72–79. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00612-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hausmann DM, et al. Atomic layer deposition of hafnium and zirconium oxides using metal amide precursors. Chem. Mater. 2002;14:4350–4358. doi: 10.1021/cm020357x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Siviloglou GA, et al. Observation of accelerating airy beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:213901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.213901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Siviloglou GA, Christodoulides DN. Accelerating finite energy airy beams. Opt. Lett. 2007;32:979–981. doi: 10.1364/OL.32.000979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Henstridge M, et al. Accelerating light with metasurfaces. Optica. 2018;5:678–681. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000678. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cottrell DM, Davis JA, Hazard TM. Direct generation of accelerating airy beams using a 3/2 phase-only pattern. Opt. Lett. 2009;34:2634–2636. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Novotny L, Hecht B. Principles of Nano-Optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fan QB, et al. Broadband generation of photonic spin-controlled arbitrary accelerating light beams in the visible. Nano Lett. 2019;19:1158–1165. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang L, et al. Grayscale transparent metasurface holograms. Optica. 2016;3:1504–1505. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.3.001504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang B, et al. Polarization-controlled color-tunable holograms with dielectric metasurfaces. Optica. 2017;4:1368–1371. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001368. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yue Z, et al. Nanometric holograms based on a topological insulator material. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15354. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang LL, Zhang S, Zentgraf T. Metasurface holography: from fundamentals to applications. Nanophotonics. 2018;7:1169–1190. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2017-0118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gerchberg RW, Saxton WO. A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik. 1972;35:237–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mueller JPB, et al. Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:113901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang K, et al. Quantum metasurface for multiphoton interference and state reconstruction. Science. 2018;361:1104–1108. doi: 10.1126/science.aat8196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kamali SM, et al. Angle-multiplexed metasurfaces: encoding independent wavefronts in a single metasurface under different illumination angles. Phys. Rev. X. 2017;7:041056. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Phan T, et al. High-efficiency, large-area, topology-optimized metasurfaces. Light: Sci. Appl. 2019;8:48. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0159-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Decker M, et al. High-efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2015;3:813–820. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pfeiffer C, Grbic A. Metamaterial Huygens’ surfaces: tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110:197401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.197401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Light, Science & Applications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES