Table 2.
WWTP1-PS | WWTP1-ES | WWTP2-RS | WWTP2-FS | WWTP1-RS 1 | MDL | MQL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
AZM | 1260 | 690 | 370 | 280 | 82 | 75 | 1040 | 940 | 100 | 110 | 23 | 79 |
CIP | 12500 | 6900 | 6200 | 2000 | 6100 | 5500 | 28000 | 22000 | 7800 | 4400 | 490 | 1670 |
CLR | 289 | 52 | 18 | 14 | 18 | 23 | 150 | 180 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 7.4 |
CLI | 40 | 25 | 58 | 35 | 29 | 29 | 47 | 30 | 9.1 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 4.5 |
LCM | 4.3 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 19 | 24 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
NOR | 5300 | 3200 | 3600 | 2500 | 1600 | 1400 | 3400 | 2300 | <MDL | 370 | 1270 | |
OFX | 810 | 890 | 640 | 510 | 300 | 190 | 480 | 120 | 36 | 21 | 12 | 41 |
OTC | 590 | 410 | 320 | 230 | 50 | 35 | 190 | 200 | 4.0 | 6.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
PEF | 250 | 150 | 190 | 110 | 140 | 120 | 256 | 81 | <MDL | 29 | 100 | |
ROX | 11.4 | 7.8 | <MDL | <MDL | <MDL | 0.22 | 0.26 | 12 | 40 | |||
SD | <MDL | <MDL | 1.1 | 0.8 | 7.7 | 11 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 1.1 | 3.7 | ||
SDM | 12 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 7.5 | 11 | <MDL | 0.29 | - | 0.6 | 2.0 | |
SXT | <MDL | 81 | 54 | <MDL | <MDL | 5.9 | 9.4 | 41 | 140 | |||
TET | 82 | 50 | 40 | 13 | 58 | 29 | 201 | 95 | 25 | 29 | 0.7 | 2.5 |
TBZ | 19.5 | 5.2 | 15.6 | 5.8 | 43 | 43 | 49 | 22 | 8.3 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 2.2 |
TMP | 170 | 110 | 5.7 | 4.4 | <MDL | <MDL | 2.6 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | ||
VAN | 363 | 55 | 181 | 91 | 36 | 30 | <MDL | 370 | 130 | 32 | 110 |
CFR (350 ng/g), FLRX (12 ng/g), LOM (7.9 ng/g), NAL (3.3 ng/g), MTZ (25 ng/g), RIF (150 ng/g), ST (30 ng/g), SDD (39 ng/g) were not detected. Their MDLs (method detection limits) are provided in parentheses; MQL, method quantitation limit; WWTP-PS, primary sludge; WWTP-ES, excessive sludge; WWTP-FS, fermented sludge, WWTP-RS residual sludge; 1calculated based to the lowest Kd observed and concentration of antimicrobials in leachate.