Skip to main content
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research logoLink to Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
. 2020 Jan 29;478(3):478–479. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001129

Pearls: Direct Visualization of Alignment Correction and Stabilization in Calcaneal Osteotomies

Zachary Zmich 1,2, Judith F Baumhauer 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7145074  PMID: 32011374

Surgeons often use radiographic assessment to aid in bone alignment and confirm screw placement for orthopaedic reconstructive procedures. Several studies have questioned the reliability and safety of fluoroscopic imaging to assess correct positioning of hardware and alignment, particularly in the foot and ankle [1-3, 5-7]. There is a simple technique that will allow direct visualization of guide pin placement allowing for accurate screw placement during calcaneal osteotomy, while also enabling the surgeon to quantify the bone displacement during commonly performed osteotomies of the calcaneus. This tip saves time and radiation exposure in the operating room while improving accuracy of screw placement due to direct visualization.

We often use medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy to correct a planovalgus foot deformity. A Dwyer osteotomy (closing wedge lateral calcaneal osteotomy or the lateral displacement calcaneal osteotomy variant) is used to correct a varus deformity of the hindfoot. These osteotomies are commonly performed through a lateral approach to the calcaneus where an oblique cut in the calcaneus is made [4]. If it is needed for visualization, or to aid in stretching the soft tissues allowing for mobility of the bone, a laminar distractor can be temporarily inserted in the osteotomy. A guidewire from a 6.5 mm, 7.0 mm, or 7.3 mm screw set is placed at the posterior and plantar aspect of the calcaneus corresponding to the intended location for definitive fixation and advanced at an angle perpendicular to the bone cut until the tip is visualized within the osteotomy (Fig. 1). To quantify the amount of displacement, the guidewire can be advanced slightly to make a temporary “mark” in the superior bone and then backed up so the tip is just under the cut bone surface. A second parallel wire is commonly used for stability and placed in a similar fashion. The displacement of the osteotomy is easily made by using one guidewire as a joystick to move the calcaneal bone either medial or lateral and again, if needed, the guidewire can “mark” the superior bone to visualize and quantify the translation or distance between the two “marks”. When the displacement is judged appropriate under this direct visualization, the surgeon advances the guidewire into the superior calcaneus. The surgeon can feel confident of the osteotomy displacement and that the screws will be in the bone, saving radiation exposure and time. A single lateral view and Harris view can confirm the final positioning of screws. If lateral staples are used, the guidewire can be helpful for direct visualization of the corrective osteotomy and temporary fixation, followed by staple placement if preferred after which the guide pin is removed.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

This figure shows the placement of the guidewire in the posterior-plantar heel with the tip visualized within the oblique osteotomy. The blue cylinder denotes the point in the bone marking the starting point prior to medial displacement of the calcaneus. This reference spot can be used to quantify the amount of translation of the bone prior to fixation. When the correction is completed, the guidewire is advanced safely as it is in appropriate position in the superior area of the calcaneus, verified by direct visualization.

Footnotes

The authors certify that neither they, nor any members of their immediate families, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.

References

  • 1.Angthong C, Adams SB, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Radiation Exposure in Total Ankle Replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1131-1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beerekamp MSH, de Muinck Keizer RJO, Schepers T, Beenen LFM, Luitse JSK, Schep NW, Ubbink DT, Goslings JC, EF3X-studygroup The correlation between intra-operative 2D- and 3D fluoroscopy with postoperative CT-scans in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. Eur J Radiol. 2019;112:222-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giordano BD, Baumhauer JF, Morgan TL, Rechtine GR. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure: comparison of standard and mini-c-arm fluoroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:297-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haddad S, Deland J. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. In: Coughlin M, Saltzman C, Anderson RB, eds. Mann’s Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kendoff D, Citak M, Gardner M, Kfuri M, Jr, Thumes B, Krettek C, Hüfner T. Three-dimensional fluoroscopy for evaluation of articular reduction and screw placement in calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:1165-1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Panchbhavi VK, Mays MM, Trevino S. Accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy with and without laser guidance in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:415-419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh PJ, Perera NS, Dega R. Measurement of the dose of radiation to the surgeon during surgery to the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89B:1060-1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons

RESOURCES