Abstract
The integral membrane protein caveolin-1 (CAV1) plays a central role in radioresistance-mediating tumor–stroma interactions of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Among the tumor–stroma, endothelial cells (EC) evolved as critical determinants of the radiation response. CAV1 deficiency in angiogenic EC was already shown to account for increased apoptosis rates of irradiated EC. This study explores the potential impact of differential CAV1 levels in EC on the acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase)/ceramide pathway as a key player in the regulation of EC apoptosis upon irradiation and cancer cell radioresistance. Enhanced apoptosis sensitivity of CAV1-deficient EC was associated with increased ASMase activity, ceramide generation, formation of large lipid platforms, and finally an altered p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/heat-shock protein 27 (HSP27)/AKT (protein kinase B, PKB) signaling. CAV1-deficient EC increased the growth delay of LNCaP and PC3 PCa cells upon radiation treatment in direct 3D spheroid co-cultures. Exogenous C6 and C16 ceramide treatment in parallel increased the growth delay of PCa spheroids and induced PCa cell apoptosis. Analysis of the respective ceramide species in PCa cells with increased CAV1 levels like those typically found in radio-resistant advanced prostate tumors further revealed an upregulation of unsaturated C24:1 ceramide that might scavenge the effects of EC-derived apoptosis-inducing C16 ceramide. Higher ASMase as well as ceramide levels could be confirmed by immunohistochemistry in human advanced prostate cancer specimen bearing characteristic CAV1 tumor–stroma alterations. Conclusively, CAV1 critically regulates the generation of ceramide-dependent (re-)organization of the plasma membrane that in turn affects the radiation response of EC and adjacent PCa cells. Understanding the CAV1-dependent crosstalk between tumor cells and the host-derived tumor microvasculature and its impact on radiosensitivity may allow to define a rational strategy for overcoming tumor radiation resistance improving clinical outcomes by targeting CAV1.
Subject terms: Cancer therapeutic resistance, Apoptosis, Cancer microenvironment, Translational research
Introduction
The mode of organization within the plasma membrane is essential for its role within several cellular processes. Cholesterol, as a major plasma membrane component, critically affects the plasma membrane organization1. Intermolecular interactions between sphingolipids and cholesterol molecules result in the lateral and local association of these lipids, finally forming sphingolipid- and cholesterol-enriched membrane domains termed lipid rafts2,3. Caveolae, non-planar specialized membrane microdomains (vesicular invaginations), form a subgroup of these lipid rafts. Herein, the integral membrane protein caveolin-1 (CAV1) was identified as a major structural component of caveolae and as cholesterol-binding protein CAV1 that stabilized those lipid rafts4,5.
Disturbance of the membrane organization, damage in membrane integrity, or lipid modifications have profound effects on lipid organization, membrane dynamics, and signaling. Cellular stress stimuli, and in particular ionizing radiation (IR), were shown to affect plasma membrane organization and especially raft microdomains6–8. Radiation generally increased membrane ceramide rapidly by directly activating acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) that hydrolyzes sphingomyelin to ceramide in rafts7. An increased ceramide content then provokes extensive spatial lipid reorganization, resulting from the fusion of membrane lipid rafts into large ceramide-enriched domains9. In contrast to the sphingolipid- and cholesterol-enriched lipid rafts that mainly were involved in cell proliferation, the larger and more long-lived ceramide-enriched lipid rafts were predominantly involved in apoptosis10–12.
Resistance to apoptosis remains one major obstacle in cancer treatment. Herein, the tumor microenvironment is increasingly recognized not just as a growth-supporting tumor compartment but as a key determinant of radiation therapy (RT) resistance13–16. Among the cell types within the tumor–stroma, ECs were shown to be critical determinants of the radiation response of tumors9,17–20. IR exposure induced acute vascular damage and EC apoptosis, leading to severe EC loss finally resulting in vascular dysfunction17,20–22. Mechanistically, the p38 MAPK signaling pathway is essential for the EC response to stress stimuli including IR23. RT-induced p38 activation in EC even reduced the survival protein AKT/PKB (protein kinase B), thereby promoting pro-apoptotic signaling23,24. RT-induced p38 pathway-dependent EC apoptosis was further linked to ASMase/ceramide signaling and plasma membrane reorganization25. ECs were characterized by high levels of ASMase expression that may account for the increased vulnerability of the endothelium to radiation-induced apoptosis26,27.
CAV1 gained increasing attention in cancer therapy because CAV1 expression levels strongly increase in malignant epithelial cells of many solid tumors at advanced tumor stages28–30. In parallel, a loss of stromal CAV1 could be observed, which correlated with tumor progression and therapy resistance, especially in prostate cancer (PCa), and may therefore be suited as a prognostic marker29,31–33. However, the vascular compartment was characterized by a stable expression of CAV119. Our own previous work revealed an association between CAV1 in EC and the RT response: silencing of CAV1 increased the radiation-induced EC death19. CAV1-deficient EC and the respective blood vessels were further characterized by a less stabilized, pro-angiogenic phenotype that facilitated tumor growth19,34,35. Even more important, these CAV1-deficient tumor ECs were more sensitive to RT and promoted an improved tumor RT response19. Lowering CAV1 levels in tumor EC may thus be suited to improve the outcome of RT in cancer.
Here, we explored a potential link between the CAV1-dependent radiation response of EC and signaling mediated by ceramide-enriched platforms that in turn lead to the activation of downstream -signaling molecules launching the apoptotic process. Furthermore, we investigated how those CAV1-dependent signaling pathways in EC affect the radiation response of adjacent PCa cells.
Results
A differential CAV1 expression in EC impacts on the AKT/PKB cell survival and the apoptosis-regulating p38 pathway upon radiation
ECs with a reduced CAV1 expression were more sensitive to IR as previously reported19 and as again confirmed here using the EC line AS-M5 without or with shRNA knockdown of CAV1 (Fig. 1a, b). To further understand a potential cross-regulation of the well-known EC stress response p38 pathway and cell survival pathways, we pretreated the EC with a p38 inhibitor (SB203580) 1–2 h prior radiation treatment. The respective cell cycle analyses 48 h after radiation revealed that radiation reduced the number of CAV(+) EC in G1/G0 only minimally, while cells in the G2/M phase increase (Fig. 1a). Upon p38 inhibitor treatment, these alterations became significant. Radiation significantly reduced the CAV1(−) cell numbers in G1/G0 and increased CAV1(−) EC in G2/M, which was not further affected upon p38 inhibition. The reduced Cav1 levels resulted in increased apoptosis rates and reduced survival fractions (Fig. 1a, b). CAV1 dependency of the p38 cell death and the AKT/PKB survival pathway was investigated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1c). Forty-eight hours after IR, increased p38 phosphorylation levels were detected in both CAV1 EC variants although the total p38 levels were not affected. The p38 downstream effector HSP27 was already phosphorylated in control conditions in both EC variants and IR causing no further increase. Apoptosis-prone CAV1-deficient EC, however, expressed higher levels of HSP27. p38 inhibitor treatment efficiently limited HSP27 phosphorylation. Of note, phosphorylation of AKT as well as total AKT protein levels were reduced in CAV1-deficient EC. A decreased expression of phosphorylated AKT was further prominent 48 h after IR, the time point of radiation-dependent apoptosis execution. A further (although slight) reduction was seen in both CAV1 EC variants upon p38 inhibitor treatment in combination with radiation. HSP90 however, that was shown to coordinate the trafficking and regulation of diverse signaling proteins in EC, was not affected by a differential CAV1 content of EC or upon radiation. In summary, radiation caused an activation of p38 MAPK. Apoptosis-prone CAV1-deficient EC was characterized by increased HSP27 levels and decreased AKT levels that might already indicate that HSP27 and AKT levels as well as their interactions are important for the regulation of cell survival versus cell death.
We then used a siRNA approach to knock down HSP27 in both EC variants (Supplemental Fig. S1). Although HSP27 siRNA treatment efficiently reduced total HSP27 levels, no additional cell cycle and cell death alterations were detected upon IR. Again, an increased p38 activity was detected in both EC variants as shown by increased p38 phosphorylation upon irradiation that were not affected by silencing HSP27. No additional effects on AKT were detected upon HSP27 silencing and IR, which suggests that HSP27 acts downstream of AKT.
Endothelial CAV1 deficiency increased the RT-induced activation of ASMase leading to increased ceramide generation
EC apoptosis was shown to depend on the early generation of ceramide25,27,36. Moreover, ECs with reduced CAV1 expression levels were more apoptosis-prone and thus more sensitive to IR19. Therefore, we first investigated the activity of ASMase and subsequent ceramide generation upon IR treatment in the EC with differential CAV1 levels (Fig. 2). Although total ASMase protein levels showed similar amounts in CAV1-proficient and CAV1-deficient EC (Fig. 1c), a significantly increased activity of the enzyme was detected in CAV1(−) EC (Fig. 2a). The resulting generation of different ceramide species was quantified and analyzed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) (Fig. 2b and Supplemental Fig. S2). ECs have been described to abundantly express the ceramide species C16, C24, and C24:1, which was confirmed in both EC CAV1 variants (Fig. 2b). Levels of C16, C24, and C24:1 ceramide were significantly increased in CAV1-deficient EC. In response to radiation, CAV1(+) EC showed a time-dependent significant increase in ASMase activity with a peak in activity at 15 min after IR. In total, 30 min after IR, these levels were decreasing nearly to control levels (Fig. 2c). In CAV1(−) EC, the already-increased ASMase activity gained a further increase upon IR (with a peak at 15 min upon IR) and the increased ASMase activity was maintained over time (Fig. 2e). The resulting ceramide levels were increased accordingly (Fig. 2d, f). Following IR, a rapid accumulation of ceramide was observed (Fig. 2d, f, g). At early time points after IR (1–15 min), the total ceramide levels as well as levels of the prominent species C16, C24, and C24:1 were promptly enhanced. Herein, ceramide generation reached a maximum of 5 min after treatment. In CAV1(+) EC, these increased ceramide levels were reduced to control levels 30 min after IR (Fig. 2d, g). In contrast, in CAV1(−) cells, ceramide generation was stabilized at the later time points (Fig. 2f, g). Conclusively, a reduction of CAV1 in EC increased ASMase activity, finally leading to increased ceramide generation. Therefore, we hypothesized that CAV1 deficiency leads to a defective ceramide homeostasis with an increase of pro-apoptotic ceramide signaling upon stress induction by IR. Apart from radiation-induced sphingomyelin hydrolysis by ASMase, ceramides can be synthesized ceramide synthases (CerS). Each CerS is known to produce a subset of ceramides that differ in their fatty acyl chain length, and in turn have distinct roles in inducing cell death versus survival. We investigated the expressions of the six mammalian CerS in CAV1(+) and CAV1(−) EC at steady state and 48 h after radiation (Supplemental Fig. S2c). While CerS5 and CerS6, which account for ceramides with fatty acyl chain length up to C16, were expressed in both cell types at similar levels and further induced following radiation treatment, CAV1(+) EC showed increased basal expression levels of CerS2 and CerS4 (accounting for very long ceramides up to C22–C24).
Thus, differential CAV1 levels in EC came along with differential ceramide species. Most importantly, the CAV1-dependent induction of ASMase-mediated sphingomyelin hydrolysis to ceramide in response to IR resulted in elevated C16 ceramide levels together with increased C24 levels in CAV1(−) EC (ratios are depicted in Supplemental Fig. S2b), that in turn might account for increased radiosensitivity of those cells.
CAV1 deficiency enhanced the formation of membrane lipid raft domains and associated p38/HSP27 signaling upon IR
Next, we investigated ceramide-induced plasma membrane remodeling from discrete structures to large lipid platforms (LLP) by immunofluorescence staining of glycosphingolipid GM1 with a fluorescent-tagged cholera-toxin-β-subunit (Fig. 3). Ten minutes after IR, agglutination and thus polarized GM1 was observed in CAV1(+) EC cells (Fig. 3a). An augmented GM1 clustering and thus the presence of LLP was observed in CAV1-deficient EC either with or without IR (Fig. 3a). Around 70% of CAV1(−) EC already contained LLP without IR, which was approximately the number of platforms/signalosomes CAV1(+) EC reached 10–30 min after IR (Fig. 3a). In CAV1-proficient EC, CAV1 was partially localized to those LLP (Fig. 3b, arrows). Of note, in CAV1(+) EC with a lower CAV1 immunoreactivity (Fig. 3b, asterisks) an increased GM1 clustering and so the presence of LLP was detected as seen in CAV1-deficient EC. The ceramide-induced LLP was further analyzed concerning a respective p38- and AKT-dependent downstream signaling (Supplemental Fig. S3). As shown for the 48-h time point after IR, p38 signaling in EC was not significantly affected by differential CAV1 levels but induced shortly after IR (5–30 min) (Supplemental Fig. S3a). Irradiated CAV1(−) EC was characterized by increased HSP27 levels. A reduction of phosphorylated AKT was already prominent 30 min after IR with overall reduced AKT levels in CAV1(−) EC, and a further slight reduction was seen in both variants upon p38 inhibitor treatment in combination with IR (Supplemental Fig. S3a). No influence of CAV1 on DNA damage response in EC upon IR could be observed (Supplemental Fig. S3b).
In summary, the results obtained up to now showed that the increased ceramide levels in EC cells, either based on RT-induced ASMase activity in CAV1-proficient EC or based on constitutively increased ASMase activity in CAV1-deficient EC, resulted in the formation of LLP, which then induced membrane remodeling and the downstream signaling. We speculated that in the normal steady-state situation of the plasma membrane, CAV1 inhibits the ceramide-induced LLP formation.
CAV1-dependent ceramide generation in EC was paralleled by an increased radiation sensitivity of PCa
We then investigated, if and how radiation of EC with a differential CAV1 content would affect the radiation response of adjacent PCa cells. Therefore, ECs were directly co-cultured with LNCaP and PC3 cells using spheroids embedded in Matrigel and subjected to RT (Fig. 4). LNCaP cells (low endogenous CAV1) co-cultured with CAV1-deficient EC showed a tendency toward accelerated growth under control conditions (Fig. 4a). RT then induced a significant growth delay of the spheroids containing LNCaP cells and CAV1(−) EC. In contrast, IR treatment of cocultures of LNCaP with CAV1-proficient EC did not affect growth inhibition. A similar increased radiation response was observed for 3D spheroids containing CAV1-deficient EC and PC3 cells (high endogenous CAV1) (Fig. 4b). In both PCa cell types, the reduction of spheroid growth was accompanied by the presence of tumor cells that were permeable for propidium iodide, and thus clearly showed radiation-induced cell death (Fig. 4a, b). Moreover, the direct contact between EC and tumor cells seemed to be important, because cultivation of PCa cells with conditioned medium collected from CAV1-proficient or -deficient EC was not sufficient to induce cell death (Supplemental Fig. S4). Conclusively, we showed here that a reduction of endothelial CAV1 not only impacts on the EC radiation response itself resulting in EC radiosensitization19, but rather leads to an increased radiation response of adjacent PCa cells, presumably through EC-derived ASMase/ceramide-mediated cell death induction. To provide a proof of principle, PCa cells were subjected to exogenous ceramide treatment (Fig. 5). LNCaP (Fig. 5a) as well as PC3 (Fig. 5b) cells were cultured as spheroids and left non-irradiated or were irradiated with 2 Gy (to include a more clinically relevant fractionated low-dose setting) or 10 Gy in the presence of C6- and C16 ceramide. Both ceramide species significantly reduced the respective spheroid growth, and resulted in cell death induction even without IR (Fig. 5a, b). For LNCaP cells, additional growth retardation was detected in combination with IR (Fig. 5a, b). Together with the results of the EC co-culture experiments, these data strongly account for targeting the ASMase/ceramide-mediated cell death as potential anti-cancer strategy, and in particular for improving the radiation response of tumors.
CAV1-proficient, radio-resistant PC3 cells were characterized by increased ceramide levels
Similar to the reduction of CAV1 in EC, a reduction of CAV1 in PCa cells resulted in an increased radiosensitivity37 (Fig. 6a). We investigated the CAV1-dependent generation of ceramide species in either CAV1-proficient or CAV1-deficient PC3 cells analogously to the above analysis (Fig. 6). PC3 cells expressed C16, C22, C24, and C24:1. However, C16, C24, and C24:1 ceramide species were significantly increased in radio-resistant CAV1-expressing PC3 cells (Fig. 6b, c). As the chain length and saturation of biologically active ceramides serve as important regulatory factors for the regulation of cell death or survival, the increased levels of unsaturated C24:1 ceramide, and thus a respective decreased C24/C24:1 ratio in the radio-resistant CAV1(+) PC3 could already indicate the inhibition of apoptosis pathways (Fig. 6b, c). Accordingly, a significantly increased ASMase activity was observed in the CAV1-proficient PC3 cells (Fig. 6d). Of note, radiation did not affect the generation of ceramide (Fig. 6e). PC3 ceramide levels were generally higher than the CAV1-dependent ceramide levels observed in EC, and in particular levels of the C16 and C24:1 ceramide species (Supplemental Fig. S5). At the same time, the activity of ASMase is really low and not inducible upon IR (Supplemental Fig. S5 and not shown).
These findings suggest that the different levels of certain ceramide species induced in the respective cells with a differential CAV1 content, are decisive for its radiation sensitivity. Most importantly, the inducibility of the ASMase-dependent ceramide generation upon IR (as seen in EC) and the subsequent ceramide-mediated membrane remodeling seemed to be decisive for affecting the cell’s signaling and thus transmitting the radiation response. In contrast, the steady-state distributions of CAV1-affected ceramide levels in membranes seem rather to affect the ordering of the membrane and consequently membrane biophysics.
Human advanced PCa specimen showed an increased ceramide immunoreactivity indicating radiation resistance
As an increase in epithelial CAV1 (together with a loss of stromal CAV1) has been linked to PCa RT resistance30,37, we decided to explore a potential link between the levels of ceramide, ASMase, and CAV1 as well as their respective stromal–epithelial distribution, in tissue specimen of human PCa (Fig. 7). Ceramide and ASMase immunoreactivity seem to be increased in the CAV1-positive malignant epithelial cells of advanced PCa specimen. Furthermore, there was a trend toward a less intense staining for ceramide and ASMase in CAV1-deficient stromal compartments of tumor samples with higher Gleason grade. Of note, CAV1-expressing EC seemed to remain ceramide- and ASMase-positive upon tumor progression (Fig. 7). Though we were not able to distinguish the different ceramide species in tumor specimen, we used the MS analyses of the respective tumor cells and EC, as well as fibroblasts being either CAV1-proficient or -deficient to mimic the human situation with respect to the differential CAV1 levels being characteristic for low-grade tumors and advanced tumor stages (Supplemental Fig. 6). In addition to the increased unsaturated C24:1 ceramide species detected in the more radio-resistant CAV1(+) PC3 cells, CAV1-deficient fibroblasts, as found in advanced, more radio-resistant tumor stages, showed significantly upregulated C24:1 ceramide levels. These results suggest that the local concentrations of certain ceramide species as found in a complex mixture of cells like in a tumor were decisive for the regulation of cell death or survival. In particular, increased levels of very-long-chain and concomitantly unsaturated ceramides might scavenge the effects of apoptosis-inducing long-chain ceramides.
Discussion
Ceramide-induced membrane remodeling following IR leads to the formation of LLP as effective signalosomes38. Here, we showed that endothelial CAV1 critically regulates this ASMase/ceramide-mediated response to IR. CAV1-enriched caveolae usually function as signaling organizing centers and platforms by modulating specific signals in a temporally and spatially controlled manner39–41. For example, the major angiogenic growth factor VEGFR2/KDR is partially localized in caveolae, and VEGFR2 binding to CAV1 significantly decreased its ability to become activated41. After stimulation, VEGFR2 shifts to non-raft membrane portions resulting in the activation of its tyrosine kinase41. These observations match with our previous findings about an increased angiogenic phenotype of CAV1-deficient EC19. In mature functional blood vessels, p38 activation and HSP27 phosphorylation are normally suppressed42. VEGFR2 was even shown to act upstream of p38-mediated HSP27 phosphorylation42. We further show that these apoptosis-prone ECs were characterized by increased levels of phosphorylated HSP27 as well as decreased AKT levels. The ceramide-mediated inhibition of AKT activation was already reported36,43. Pro-apoptotic stress-induced ceramide fostered apoptosis via the downregulation of the PI3K/AKT survival pathway36. A downregulation of AKT was further reported to increase cellular stress in EC via activation of p3844.
However, how a loss of CAV1 in EC affects downstream signaling and/or exerts paracrine effects on adjacent parenchyma remained elusive45. We showed now that CAV1 deficiency in EC increased the formation of membrane signalosomes and thus affected p38 and AKT downstream signaling ultimately leading to EC apoptosis (Fig. 8). High doses of IR induced ceramide generation from sphingomyelin hydrolysis by the translocation and subsequent activation of the lysosomal ASMase to the plasma membrane25,27. Due to their specific biophysical properties, ceramides fostered then the formation of ceramide-enriched LLP, which acts as signaling platforms for an altered signaling and apoptosis initiation. Ceramide is known to displace cholesterol from lipid rafts and to decrease the association of cholesterol to CAV140. Mechanistically, a signaling complex consisting of AKT, p38, MK2 (MAPKAPK-2), and HSP27 was concluded46,47. In unstressed situations, p38 constitutively interacts with HSP27. MK2 is needed for the formation of the module together with AKT46. Upon cellular stress, AKT and p38 were activated and disrupted the interaction between p38 and HSP27 by phosphorylation of HSP2746. Upon activation, HSP27 was shown to dissociate from that complex and in particular from AKT47. The disruption of the HSP27–AKT interactions on the other hand impaired AKT activation. Sequestration of HSP27 from AKT increased apoptosis rates47. Thus, through control of AKT activity, HSP27 regulates apoptosis. In addition, MK2 (activated by p38) was shown to phosphorylate AKT. Conclusively, plasma membrane remodeling prior signaling implicates that CAV1 and ASMase-dependent generation of ceramide were essential for stress-responsive cell-fate decisions like survival and/or cell death.
One of our initial hypotheses was that lowering the CAV1 content, particularly in EC, might increase the radiation response of tumors with increased CAV1 expression levels19. Silencing of CAV1 in cancer cells themselves was already shown to re-sensitize tumor cells to RT-induced apoptosis48–51. Even in PCa, which is characterized by increased CAV1 expression levels in malignant epithelial cells at advanced, more radio-resistant disease stages, a reduction of CAV1 was suited to achieve tumor cell radiosensitization30,37. We demonstrated here that RT induced a significant growth delay and cell death in PCa spheroids when co-cultured with CAV1-deficient ECs that were at least partially mediated by RT-induced ASMase/ceramide signaling in EC. Quantification of the different ceramide species using LC–MS/MS revealed that EC expressed C16, C24, and C24:1 ceramide differentially, particularly in response to IR. CAV1(−) EC showed a decreased C24/C24:1 ceramide ratio, which, together with elevated C16 ceramide levels, might (i) account for the increased sensitivity of those cells to radiation-induced apoptosis, and (ii) might alter the behavior, including the radiation response of adjacent PCa cells. Of note, EC apoptosis by the production of ceramide was shown to depend on doses higher than 5 Gy52–54. Although we did not investigate here the potential effects of EC on adjacent PCa cells at doses lower than 10 Gy, the treatment of PCa spheroids with different exogenous ceramide species revealed a significant growth retardation and cell death induction.
In the complex in vivo situation of a tumor, the RT-induced potential of EC to induce cancer cell apoptosis may not be sufficient for the overall therapy response because of the tumor’s complex microenvironment. We additionally investigated the CAV1-dependent expression of ceramide species in PCa cells and fibroblasts with differential CAV1 levels. Although C16, C22, C24, and C24:1 were shown to be expressed in both PC3 variants, the C16 and C24:1 ceramide species were significantly increased in the more radio-resistant CAV1-expressing PC3 PCa cells. C24:1 ceramide was even increased in radio-resistant CAV1-deficient fibroblasts. IR-induced activation of apoptosis preferentially facilitated ceramide-enriched membrane domains that were formed by saturated ceramides55,56. The increase in unsaturated very-long-chain C24:1 ceramide in both cell types here accounted for an increased C24/C24:1 ratio, which might counteract the assumed apoptosis-inducing effects of long-chain ceramides.
Thus, the overall concentration and distribution of certain ceramide species might be crucial for apoptosis induction57. We showed here that advanced PCa specimens were characterized by increased ceramide as well as ASMase amounts in the CAV1-positive malignant epithelial cells. Using CAV1(+) EC, CAV1(−) PC3 together with CAV1(+) HS5 fibroblasts as a model combination for the CAV1 status of the respective cells found in healthy or low-grade prostate carcinoma, and CAV1(+) EC, CAV1(+) PC3 together with CAV1(−) fibroblasts as a model combination for advanced tumor stages, it becomes clear that the very-long-chain ceramides are expressed in higher amounts in each respective more radio-resistant CAV1 variant. The increased levels of unsaturated C24:1 in CAV1(+) PC3 and CAV1(−) fibroblasts in turn may account then for the absent apoptosis usually mediated by long-chain ceramides, in particular by C16 ceramide derived from irradiated CAV1(+) EC. It is important to note that, in contrast to the CAV1-dependent ceramide levels in EC, the differential ceramide levels and the respective ceramide species detected at steady state in CAV1 pro- and deficient PCa cells and stromal fibroblasts were not further affected by IR treatment. Accordingly, modifying the equilibrium between the chain lengths of ceramides, e.g., a shift from C24 to C16 was shown to increase the susceptibility of cancer cells to apoptosis58. In PCa, increases in C16 ceramide levels fostered apoptosis of LNCaP cells59.
Conclusively, targeting the membrane’s lipid organization and/or composition here bears the potential for a therapeutical approach. Ceramides or synthetic, metabolically stabilized analogs with pro-apoptotic properties (e.g., C16) may be useful as anticancer agents57. In PCa, the use of agents that elevate ceramide levels as novel chemotherapeutic agents was already suggested60. Increases in cellular ceramide here resulted in cell death induction, and in particular radiosensitization of the respective PCa tumors60. These studies, together with the results we presented here, suggest that targeting the ceramide pathways may be a novel treatment strategy for radiation-resistant PCa.
Materials and methods
Materials
The CAV1 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); antibodies against phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182), p38, phospho-HSP27 (Ser82), HSP27, HSP90, phospho-AKT (Ser473), and AKT were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA; all 1:1000 WB). Antibody for beta-actin (clone AC-74, A2228) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The goat-anti-ASMase antibody was kindly provided by Prof. K. Sandhoff (Bonn, Germany)61.
Cell cultures
The human PCa cell lines LNCaP and PC3 as well as the fibroblast cell line HS5 were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. All cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (every two weeks) and periodic authenticated by STR profiling (if necessary, no later than yearly). ECs AS-M5 were cultured in Medium 199 (Gibco, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 20% FCS, 100 U penicillin/streptomycin, and 15 mg of EC Growth Supplement (Sigma) at similar conditions. Cells were passaged 2–3 times per week. CAV1 levels in AS-M5, HS5, and PC3 cells were downregulated by lentiviral-transduced shRNA as previously described and labeled with green-fluorescent protein19,37. Exogenous C6- and C16 ceramide (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was solved in 100% EtOH and added after radiation treatment (both 10 µM). Prior to treatment, cells were starved in medium containing 0.5% FCS overnight. The selective inhibitor of p38 MAPK SB203580 (4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-imidazole, Cell Signaling Technology) that inhibits p38 MAPK catalytic activity by binding to the ATP-binding pocket, and thus the activation of MAPKAPK-2 and subsequent phosphorylation of HSP27, was dissolved in DMSO and used at 10 µM 2 h prior irradiation (end concentration).
Spheroid culture
PC3 or LNCaP cells were cultured alone or in combination with AS-M5 CAV1(+) or CAV1(−) cells in hanging drops for 24 h (ratio 1/1). Afterward, spheroids were plated in normal growth medium (NGM) with growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning, NY, USA) (dilution: 1/2). Pictures were taken directly and 48 h after treatment at ×10 magnification. Size was measured and calculated using ImageJ software. For the detection of cell death, spheroids were incubated thereafter for additional 15 min with propidium iodide (50 µg/mL) and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for nuclei staining and analyzed by fluorescent and phase-contrast microscopy.
Irradiation
Irradiation of cultured cells was performed using an Isovolt-320-X-ray machine (Seifert-Pantak) at 320 kV, 10 mA, and a 1.65-mm aluminum filter at a distance of 50 cm. The dose rate was approximately 3 Gy/min with an energy of the tube of 90 kV (~45-keV X-rays). Irradiation for LC–MS/MS, ASMase activity, and LLP staining was performed with a 160-kV irradiator (CP160 Faxitron X-ray, USA) at a dose rate of 1.48 Gy/min.
siRNA transfection
Control A and B siRNA, and HSP27 siRNA (h; sc-29350) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. For siRNA treatment, CAV1(+) and CAV1(−) EC were transfected with non-silencing (control) and HSP27 siRNA using Santa Cruz Biotechnology’s siRNA Transfection Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were irradiated the next day with 0 (−) or 10 (+) Gy and analyzed for downstream effects after additional 48 h (72 h after transfection).
Conditioned medium
EC cells were grown until 80% confluency in NGM, irradiated with 0 Gy (control) or 10 Gy, and cultured for an additional 48 h in low FCS medium (2%). The supernatant was harvested and centrifuged to separate dead cells. Conditioned medium was used with NGM (ratio 1:2).
Flow cytometry
Apoptotic cells (sub-G1 fraction) and cell cycle phases were analyzed by using Nicoletti/propidium iodide staining [PI, 0.1% sodium citrate (w/v), 50 µg/mL PI (v/v), and 0.05% Triton X-100 (v/v)] as previously described62. Cells were stained for 30 min in the dark and subsequently measured with flow cytometer FACS Calibur (BD, Heidelberg, Germany, FL2). Analysis was done using FlowJo software.
LC–MS for ceramide quantification
Extraction of lipids was performed by using chloroform/methanol (1/2, v/v) and LC–MS/MS was done as previously described63. The assay was performed on a HP 1100 series liquid chromatography (Agilent) in line with an electrospray ion mass spectrometer Esquire 4.5 series (BD). Different ceramide species were analyzed with an UptiSphere 5ODB column and the integration of the respective species was done using QuantAnalysis software (BD). Samples contained an internal standard (C17:1) that was used as a loading control.
ASMase activity assay
ASMase activity was quantified with BODIPY Sphingomyelin (Invitrogen). One microgram of lysed protein sample was incubated with fluorescent sphingomyelin overnight at 37 °C allowing ASMase cleavage to BODIPY ceramide. The reaction was stopped using a mixture of chloroform/methanol (1/1 v/v), and after centrifugation, the organic phase containing the lipids was evaporated with nitrogen. Separation of the lipids was performed using a thin-layer chromatography silica membrane in chloroform/methanol (95/5, v/v) (Whatman, UK). After drying, the plate was analyzed with chemoluminescence, and ASMase activity was determined from the relation of BODIPY ceramide to sphingomyelin.
Western blotting
After treatment, cells were scraped in ice-cold RIPA buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate, 50 mmol/L Tris/HCL, pH 8, 10 mmol/L NaF, and 1 mmol/L Na3VO4) containing complete Protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Two to three thaw/freeze cycles were performed before subjecting whole-cell lysates to SDS-gel electrophoresis as previously described19,37,64.
Large lipid platform (GM1) staining
Cells were seeded on coverslips, irradiated, and placed directly on ice at the indicated time points after IR. Lipid platforms were stained by using 0.1 mM AlexaFluor647-conjugated cholera-toxin B-subunit for 45 min as described before25. Cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min. After blocking with 10% bovine serum albumin for 20 min, co-staining with CAV1 was performed in a dilution of 1:100 in blocking buffer for 1 h. Samples were mounted with GoldProlong containing DAPI (ThermoFisher) to visualize nuclei. Pictures were taken with a Leica confocal microscope.
Immunofluorescent detection of double-strand breaks
Cells were seeded on coverslips and treated with 3-Gy irradiation. Fixation was performed at the indicated time points (0.5–24 h) with 4% PFA for 15 min following permeabilization with 0.1% Triton for 5 min. Staining of ɣH2.AX foci was done using an AlexaFluor647-labeled anti-H2AX antibody conjugated with (BD) for 1 h. Samples were incubated with Hoechst 33342 to visualize nuclei. At least 50 foci per condition were counted using the focinator software65.
Real-time (RT) qPCR
RNA was isolated by using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) after the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of cDNA was used, and expression levels of the indicated genes were compared with housekeeping gene beta-actin (set as 1). The following primer sequences were used: CerS1 for CCTCCAGCCCAGAGAT, rev: AGAAGGGGTAGTCGGTG; CerS2 for CCAGGTAGAGCGTTGGTT, rev: CCAGGGTTTATCCACAATGAC; CerS3 for CCTGGCTGCTATTAGTCTGAT, rev: TCACGAGGGTCCCACT; CerS4 for GCAAGGATTTCAAGGAGCAG, rev: AACAGCAGCACCAGAGAG; CerS5 for CAAGTATCAGCGGCTCTGT, rev: ATTATCTCCCAACTCTCAAAGA; CerS6 for AAGCAACTGGACTGGGATGTT, rev: AATCTGACTCCGTAGGTAAATACA; β-ACTIN for TCCATCATGAAGTGTGACGT, rev: GAGCAATGATCTTGATCTTCAT. RT-qPCR was performed in an Agilent Aria cycler.
Human tumor tissue
Tissues from human prostate carcinomas were obtained during surgery according to local ethical and biohazard regulations. All experiments were performed in strict accordance with local guidelines and regulations. Resected tissue specimens were processed for pathological diagnostic routine in agreement with institutional standards, and diagnoses were made based on current WHO and updated ISUP criteria19,37. All studies including human tissue samples were approved by the local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission) of the University Hospital Essen (Nr. 10-4363 and 10-4051). Human tissue samples were analyzed anonymously. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence staining was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded slides of human PCa samples as previously described30,37. Samples were prepared by using a descending alcohol series and incubation with target retrieval solution (DAKO). Afterward, slides were blocked with a 2% FCS/PBS blocking solution to reduce unspecific interactions, and primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Antigens were detected either by horseradish-peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies and DAB staining (IHC) or fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin or DAPI.
Statistical analysis
If not otherwise indicated, data were obtained from at least three independent experiments (n = 3). Mean values were calculated and used for analysis of standard deviation or standard error. Statistical significance was evaluated by one- or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s, Sidak’s, or Bonferroni multiple comparisons post test as indicated. Statistical significance was set at the level of p ≤ 0.05 (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.005, ****p ≤ 0.001). Data analysis were performed with Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Mohamed Benchellal and Eva Gau for their excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by grants of the DFG (GRK1739/1; GRK1739/2) and the BMBF (02NUK047D).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by A. Stephanou
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Francois Paris, Diana Klein
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-020-2418-z).
References
- 1.Bernardes, N. & Fialho, A. M. Perturbing the dynamics and organization of cell membrane components: a new paradigm for cancer-targeted therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms19123871 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Lingwood D, Kaiser HJ, Levental I, Simons K. Lipid rafts as functional heterogeneity in cell membranes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009;37:955–960. doi: 10.1042/BST0370955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Glenney JR, Jr, Soppet D. Sequence and expression of caveolin, a protein component of caveolae plasma membrane domains phosphorylated on tyrosine in Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:10517–10521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rothberg KG, et al. Caveolin a protein component of caveolae membrane coats. Cell. 1992;68:673–682. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90143-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bionda C, et al. Radioresistance of human carcinoma cells is correlated to a defect in raft membrane clustering. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007;43:681–694. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pouget JP, Georgakilas AG, Ravanat JL. Targeted and off-target (Bystander and Abscopal) effects of radiation therapy: redox mechanisms and risk/benefit analysis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;29:1447–1487. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stancevic B, Kolesnick R. Ceramide-rich platforms in transmembrane signaling. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:1728–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Corre I, Guillonneau M, Paris F. Membrane signaling induced by high doses of ionizing radiation in the endothelial compartment. Relevance in radiation toxicity. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:22678–22696. doi: 10.3390/ijms141122678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Quinn PJ. Lipid-lipid interactions in bilayer membranes: married couples and casual liaisons. Prog. Lipid Res. 2012;51:179–198. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zalba S, Ten Hagen TL. Cell membrane modulation as adjuvant in cancer therapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017;52:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tekpli X, Holme JA, Sergent O, Lagadic-Gossmann D. Role for membrane remodeling in cell death: implication for health and disease. Toxicology. 2013;304:141–157. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang P, et al. Identification of genetic loci that control mammary tumor susceptibility through the host microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8919. doi: 10.1038/srep08919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakasone ES, et al. Imaging tumor-stroma interactions during chemotherapy reveals contributions of the microenvironment to resistance. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:488–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Furuta S, Ghajar CM, Bissell MJ. Caveolin-1: would-be Achilles’ heel of tumor microenvironment? Cell Cycle. 2011;10:3431. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.20.17648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kenny PA, Lee GY, Bissell MJ. Targeting the tumor microenvironment. Front. Biosci. 2007;12:3468–3474. doi: 10.2741/2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Paris F, et al. Endothelial apoptosis as the primary lesion initiating intestinal radiation damage in mice. Science. 2001;293:293–297. doi: 10.1126/science.1060191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wiesemann A, et al. Inhibition of radiation-induced Ccl2 signaling protects lungs from vascular dysfunction and endothelial cell loss. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019;30:213–231. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klein D, et al. Endothelial Caveolin-1 regulates the radiation response of epithelial prostate tumors. Oncogenesis. 2015;4:e148. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klein D. The tumor vascular endothelium as decision maker in cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 2018;8:367. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Korpela E, Liu SK. Endothelial perturbations and therapeutic strategies in normal tissue radiation damage. Radiat. Oncol. 2014;9:266. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0266-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bonnaud S, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate activates the AKT pathway to protect small intestines from radiation-induced endothelial apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9905–9915. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corre I, Paris F, Huot J. The p38 pathway, a major pleiotropic cascade that transduces stress and metastatic signals in endothelial cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:55684–55714. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dai S, et al. Comprehensive characterization of heat shock protein 27 phosphorylation in human endothelial cells stimulated by the microbial dithiole thiolutin. J. Proteome Res. 2008;7:4384–4395. doi: 10.1021/pr800376w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Niaudet C, et al. Plasma membrane reorganization links acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide to p38 MAPK pathways in endothelial cells apoptosis. Cell Signal. 2017;33:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003;22:5897–5906. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haimovitz-Friedman A, et al. Ionizing radiation acts on cellular membranes to generate ceramide and initiate apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 1994;180:525–535. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Niu CC, et al. Identification of mesenchymal stem cells and osteogenic factors in bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood for spinal fusion by flow cytometry and proteomic analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2014;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ketteler J, Klein D. Caveolin-1, cancer and therapy resistance. Int J. Cancer. 2018;143:2092–2104. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ketteler, J. et al. Progression-related loss of stromal caveolin 1 levels mediates radiation resistance in prostate carcinoma via the apoptosis inhibitor TRIAP1. J. Clin. Med. 10.3390/jcm8030348 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Di Vizio D, et al. An absence of stromal caveolin-1 is associated with advanced prostate cancer, metastatic disease and epithelial Akt activation. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2420–2424. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.15.9116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ayala G, et al. Loss of caveolin-1 in prostate cancer stroma correlates with reduced relapse-free survival and is functionally relevant to tumour progression. J. Pathol. 2013;231:77–87. doi: 10.1002/path.4217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Witkiewicz AK, et al. An absence of stromal caveolin-1 expression predicts early tumor recurrence and poor clinical outcome in human breast cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;174:2023–2034. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin MI, Yu J, Murata T, Sessa WC. Caveolin-1-deficient mice have increased tumor microvascular permeability, angiogenesis, and growth. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2849–2856. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dewever J, et al. Caveolin-1 is critical for the maturation of tumor blood vessels through the regulation of both endothelial tube formation and mural cell recruitment. Am. J. Pathol. 2007;171:1619–1628. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zundel W, Swiersz LM, Giaccia A. Caveolin 1-mediated regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity by ceramide. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:1507–1514. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1507-1514.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Panic A, et al. Progression-related loss of stromal Caveolin 1 levels fosters the growth of human PC3 xenografts and mediates radiation resistance. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41138. doi: 10.1038/srep41138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bonnaud S, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate protects proliferating endothelial cells from ceramide-induced apoptosis but not from DNA damage-induced mitotic death. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1803–1811. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lajoie P, Nabi IR. Lipid rafts, caveolae, and their endocytosis. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010;282:135–163. doi: 10.1016/S1937-6448(10)82003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yu C, Alterman M, Dobrowsky RT. Ceramide displaces cholesterol from lipid rafts and decreases the association of the cholesterol binding protein caveolin-1. J. Lipid Res. 2005;46:1678–1691. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500060-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Caliceti C, et al. Role of plasma membrane caveolae/lipid rafts in VEGF-induced redox signaling in human leukemia cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:857504. doi: 10.1155/2014/857504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sawada J, Li F, Komatsu M. R-Ras inhibits VEGF-induced p38MAPK activation and HSP27 phosphorylation in endothelial cells. J. Vasc. Res. 2015;52:347–359. doi: 10.1159/000444526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhou H, Summers SA, Birnbaum MJ, Pittman RN. Inhibition of Akt kinase by cell-permeable ceramide and its implications for ceramide-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:16568–16575. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sabbineni H, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of beta-catenin prevents EndMT in vitro and vascular remodeling in vivo resulting from endothelial Akt1 suppression. Biochem. Pharm. 2019;164:205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Murata T, et al. Reexpression of caveolin-1 in endothelium rescues the vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary defects in global caveolin-1 knockout mice. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:2373–2382. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zheng C, et al. MAPK-activated protein kinase-2 (MK2)-mediated formation and phosphorylation-regulated dissociation of the signal complex consisting of p38, MK2, Akt, and Hsp27. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:37215–37226. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603622200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rane MJ, et al. Heat shock protein 27 controls apoptosis by regulating Akt activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:27828–27835. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303417200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Barzan D, Maier P, Zeller WJ, Wenz F, Herskind C. Overexpression of caveolin-1 in lymphoblastoid TK6 cells enhances proliferation after irradiation with clinically relevant doses. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2010;186:99–106. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cordes N, et al. Human pancreatic tumor cells are sensitized to ionizing radiation by knockdown of caveolin-1. Oncogene. 2007;26:6851–6862. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hehlgans S, Cordes N. Caveolin-1: an essential modulator of cancer cell radio-and chemoresistance. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2011;1:521–530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hehlgans S, et al. Caveolin-1 mediated radioresistance of 3D grown pancreatic cancer cells. Radiother. Oncol. 2009;92:362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Baselet B, Sonveaux P, Baatout S, Aerts A. Pathological effects of ionizing radiation: endothelial activation and dysfunction. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:699–728. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2956-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fuks Z, Kolesnick R. Engaging the vascular component of the tumor response. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:89–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sathishkumar S, et al. Elevated sphingomyelinase activity and ceramide concentration in serum of patients undergoing high dose spatially fractionated radiation treatment: implications for endothelial apoptosis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2005;4:979–986. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.9.1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pinto SN, Silva LC, Futerman AH, Prieto M. Effect of ceramide structure on membrane biophysical properties: the role of acyl chain length and unsaturation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:2753–2760. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lee H, et al. Mitochondrial ceramide-rich macrodomains functionalize Bax upon irradiation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Blaess M, Le HP, Claus RA, Kohl M, Deigner HP. Stereospecific induction of apoptosis in tumor cells via endogenous C16-ceramide and distinct transcripts. Cell Death Discov. 2015;1:15013. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2015.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sassa T, Suto S, Okayasu Y, Kihara A. A shift in sphingolipid composition from C24 to C16 increases susceptibility to apoptosis in HeLa cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1821:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Eto M, et al. C16 ceramide accumulates following androgen ablation in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2003;57:66–79. doi: 10.1002/pros.10275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Samsel L, et al. The ceramide analog, B13, induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines and inhibits tumor growth in prostate cancer xenografts. Prostate. 2004;58:382–393. doi: 10.1002/pros.10350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lansmann S, et al. Purification of acid sphingomyelinase from human placenta: characterization and N-terminal sequence. FEBS Lett. 1996;399:227–231. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01331-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Riccardi C, Nicoletti I. Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:1458–1461. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Croyal M, et al. Fenofibrate decreases plasma ceramide in type 2 diabetes patients: a novel marker of CVD? Diabetes Metab. 2018;44:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Klein D, et al. Wnt2 acts as a cell type-specific, autocrine growth factor in rat hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells cross-stimulating the VEGF pathway. Hepatology. 2008;47:1018–1031. doi: 10.1002/hep.22084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oeck S, Malewicz NM, Hurst S, Rudner J, Jendrossek V. The Focinator—a new open-source tool for high-throughput foci evaluation of DNA damage. Radiat. Oncol. 2015;10:163. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0453-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.