Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2020 Mar 3;117(14):7573–7574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001049117

Reply to Brewer: Liver-targeted ALDH2 inhibition may reduce alcohol-seeking behaviors with limited side effects

Adrien Guillot a,1, George F Koob b, Bin Gao a,2
PMCID: PMC7148570  PMID: 32127485

We are pleased to read the Letter from Dr. Brewer (1) on our paper in PNAS (2). In our manuscript, we only briefly discuss our current knowledge about aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) inhibition therapy for the treatment of alcohol user disorder (AUD) due to space limitation. We greatly appreciate Dr. Brewer for elaborating on previous findings in the area of ALDH2 inhibition therapies that were tested both in patients and in animal models (1). It is true that the effects of ALDH2 genotype on alcohol-seeking behavior have been well documented (3) and many drugs that inhibit ALDH2 activities have been developed to treat AUD (4). For example, cyanamide (in the form of calcium carbimide citrate salt) can inhibit ALDH activity via its active metabolite and is still used therapeutically as an alcohol-aversive agent (Temposil) in Europe, Canada, and Japan (4). Disulfiram and cyanamide both are potent ALDH inhibitors and thus act as alcohol-drinking deterrents, through unpleasant experiences (e.g., nausea, tachycardia, flushing) produced by the accumulation of acetaldehyde in the blood of treated patients (4). Cyanamide is a second-line drug compared to disulfiram because of its capacity to produce greater liver damage compared with disulfiram (4). As described by Dr. Brewer, adjustments of the disulfiram therapy have shown promising results and supervised disulfiram treatment currently remains the most effective therapy in this drug class (5, 6); however, disulfiram therapy may generate side effects such as liver toxicity, neuropathies, and other adverse effects (79). In addition, although disulfiram has been repurposed as an anticancer agent (10), chronic disulfiram treatment may cause elevation of systemic and local acetaldehyde levels in alcoholics, thereby increasing the risk of cancer development.

By using liver-specific Aldh2 knockout mice and in vivo hepatocyte-Aldh2 expression knockdown, we demonstrated that a liver-targeted approach might be sufficient to reduce alcohol-seeking behavior while having limited effects on other metabolic parameters and global body functions (2). Major benefits from such strategies include limiting side effects on other organs, and cancer due to toxic acetaldehyde buildup in the general blood circulation and in other organs. Finally, such an approach may favor patients’ compliance to treatment by limiting the unpleasant effects of increased circulating acetaldehyde levels. Because numerous approaches could be used to specifically deliver a therapeutic agent to the liver and to the hepatocytes, such as modified liposomes, apolipoproteins, polymers, or viral vectors (11), it is feasible to specifically inhibit ALDH2 in the liver, and we hope our study may serve as a basis for the development of liver-targeted AUD treatment.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the intramural program of National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH (to B.G.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  • 1.Brewer C., Partial ALDH inhibition to facilitate controlled drinking rather than abstinence has already been tried and it works. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 7572 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guillot A., et al. , Targeting liver aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 prevents heavy but not moderate alcohol drinking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 25974–25981 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edenberg H. J., McClintick J. N., Alcohol dehydrogenases, aldehyde dehydrogenases, and alcohol use disorders: A critical review. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 42, 2281–2297 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koppaka V., et al. , Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: A comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharmacol. Rev. 64, 520–539 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Skinner M. D., Lahmek P., Pham H., Aubin H. J., Disulfiram efficacy in the treatment of alcohol dependence: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 9, e87366 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fuller R. K., Gordis E., Does disulfiram have a role in alcoholism treatment today? Addiction 99, 21–24 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chick J., Disulfiram: Cautions on liver function; how to supervise. Addiction 99, 25–, author reply 27–28. (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chick J., Safety issues concerning the use of disulfiram in treating alcohol dependence. Drug Saf. 20, 427–435 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balakirev M. Y., Zimmer G., Mitochondrial injury by disulfiram: Two different mechanisms of the mitochondrial permeability transition. Chem. Biol. Interact. 138, 299–311 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ekinci E., Rohondia S., Khan R., Dou Q. P., Repurposing disulfiram as an anti-cancer agent: Updated review on literature and patents. Recent Patents Anticancer Drug Discov. 14, 113–132 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Poelstra K., Prakash J., Beljaars L., Drug targeting to the diseased liver. J. Control. Release 161, 188–197 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES