Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2013 Mar 1:671–680. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385095-9.00091-9

FPR Ligands

Ying Liu, Keqiang Chen, Ji Ming Wang
Editor: Abba J Kastin
PMCID: PMC7150094

ABSTRACT

Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) belong to the classical G protein-coupled chemoattractant receptor family. They are mainly expressed in mammalian phagocytic leukocytes and play important roles in inflammatory and immune responses. N-formyl peptides produced by Gram-negative bacteria were among the first chemotactic factors identified for two FPRs in human beings: FPR1 (originally termed FPR) and FPR2 (originally termed FPRL1). During the past few years, a variety of novel pathogen- and host-derived agonists as well as antagonists for the FPR family have been identified, indicating a broader spectrum of the biological significance of these receptors. Activation of FPRs in leukocytes by agonists induces cell chemotaxis, phagocytosis, release of proinflammatory mediators and gene transcription. Despite these new developments, the in vivo functions of FPRs and their ligands in disease states are not yet fully understood. This chapter summarizes the pharmacological characterization of FPR ligands and their implications in pathophysiological conditions.

Introduction

Inflammation is essentially a protective attempt by the organisms to remove the injurious stimuli and to initiate the healing process. The migration of leukocytes is crucial in the progression and resolution of inflammation and is tightly regulated. Leukocytes accumulate at the sites of inflammation by responding to pathogen- and host-derived chemotactic factors named chemoattractants. Numerous chemoattractants have been described including chemokines, activated complement fragments, lipid mediators, and pathogen-derived molecules.32

Most chemoattractants use G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) classified as GPCRs for chemokines and for classical chemoattractants. Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) belong to the family of classical GPCRs. These receptors are named based on their capacity to recognize the N-formyl methionine motif in synthetic neutrophil chemotactic peptides and in peptide fragments released into the culture supernatants by Escherichia coli. 32 The FPR family members are coupled to pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive Gi proteins and mediate neutrophil and monocyte chemotaxis and activation.11 Although FPRs were identified and cloned in the early 1990s,19 the biological function of these receptors remains poorly understood. However, with the identification of a number of novel nonformylated and host-derived agonists for FPRs, it is becoming evident that these receptors and their peptide ligands play important roles in innate and adaptive immune responses.

Formyl Peptide Receptors (FPRs)

The prototype human FPR was cloned from differentiated HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells.32 Two additional human FPRs were subsequently cloned and were named as FPR like-1 (FPRL1) and FPRL2. Recently, these GPCRs were renamed as FPR1, FPR2/ALX (FPRL1), and FPR3 (FPRL2). FPR1 and FPR2 share 69% identity at the amino acid level, whereas FPR3 has 56% amino acid sequence identity to human FPR1 and 83% to FPR2.32 Both human FPR1 and FPR2 are expressed in many cell types, such as myeloid cells including monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils and immature dendritic cells (DCs), endothelial cells, hepatocytes, astrocytes, microglial cells, and fibroblasts.32 The expression of human FPR3 is more restricted and is detected in monocytes/macrophages and DCs but not in neutrophils.32 FPR3 is also expressed in plasmacytoid DCs and is upregulated on cell maturation.10 The signal transduction pathways of FPRs have been more extensively studied with FPR1 in phagocytic cells and in cell lines transfected with cloned receptor. The interaction of FPR1 with its agonist peptide fMLF uncouples trimeric G proteins to elicit a signaling cascade that activates phospholipase C (PLC), protein kinase C (PKC) and PI3 kinases (PI3Ks), which are translated into biological functions of receptor-bearing cells including chemotaxis and mediator release. FPR1 and FPR2 also crosstalk with some receptor tyrosine kinases, such as nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor TrkA and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).12., 15.

In the mouse FPR gene family, there are at least eight members, Fpr1 and Fpr-rs1 to Fpr-rs7. 32 Fpr1 encodes mFPR1, which is the ortholog of human FPR1 and binds fMLF with a relatively high affinity, whereas both Fpr-rs1 and Fpr-rs2 encode receptors most similar to human FPR2.32 The gene product of mouse Fpr-rs2, mFPR2, is a low-affinity receptor for fMLF.19 The biological functions of other six mouse Fpr gene homologs have not been characterized.32 The high sequence divergence between species orthologs (∼25–30% between human and mouse) indicates the complicated evolution of the FPR gene family.32 In vivo, mFPR1-KO mice were more susceptible to infection by Listeria monocytogenes, indicating the role of FPR1 in antibacterial defense.32 More recently, FPR1 (mFPR1) was shown to mediate trauma reaction in severe inflammatory response syndrome34 and neutrophil accumulation in the necrotic center of the liver injury, presumably by responding to N-formylated mitochondrial peptides released by ruptured cells.24 mFPR2-KO mice have also been generated recently and show diminished allergic airway inflammation and accompanying immune responses.2 FPR2 (mFPR2) expressed in human and mouse neutrophils interacts with an acute-phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) produced by liver and also by melanoma cells to promote the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, which increases the interaction of neutrophils with invariant natural killer (NK) T cells. These NKT cells limit the immunosuppressive activity of neutrophils by decreasing IL-10, but increasing IL-12 production, thereby enhancing the anti-melanoma host responses.8 These new developments highlight the critical function of FPR1 and FPR2 in innate and adaptive host responses.

FPR Agonists

FPRs recognize many agonists including peptides and nonpeptides. The peptides comprise three subtypes, pathogen-derived, host-derived and synthetic. The nonpeptides are either synthetic or derived from the host32 (Table 1 ).

TABLE 1.

The Agonists of FPRs

Agonists Origin Receptors
Peptides
Bacteria-derived N-formyl peptides
N-formyl-MLF E. coli FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MIFL S. aureus mFPR1
N-formyl-MIVIL L. monocytogenes FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MIGWI L. monocytogenes FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MIVTLF L. monocytogenes FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MIGWII L. monocytogenes FPR1
N-formyl-MFEDAVAWF M. avium FPR1
Mitochondria-derived N-formyl peptides
N-formyl-MMYALF Mitochondria, ND6 FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MLKLIV Mitochondria, ND4 FPR1, FPR2
N-formyl-MYFINILTL Mitochondria, ND1 FPR2
N-formyl-MFADRW
N-formyl-Nle-LF-Nle-YK
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit
Synthetic
FPR1, FPR2
FPR1, FPR2
Mitocryptide-2 (MCT-2) Mitochondria cytochrome b FPR2
Microbe-derived peptides
Hp (2–20) H. pylori FPR2, FPR3
T20 (DP178) HIV-1 gp41 aa. 643–678 FPR1
T21 (DP107) HIV-1 gp41 aa. 558–595 FPR2
V3 peptide HIV-1 gp120, V3 loop FPR2
N36 peptide HIV-1 gp41 aa. 546–581 FPR2
F peptide HIV-1 gp120 aa. 414–434 FPR2
gG-2p20 Herpes simplex virus type 2 FPR1
N-formyl HKU-1 coronavirus peptide Respiratory syndrome coronavirus FPR1
Host-derived peptides
CKβ8–1 (human CCL23) Chemokine FPR2, CCR1
SHAAGtide CCL23 N-terminal 18 aa. FPR2, CCR1
Humanin (HN) Neuroprotective peptide FPR2, FPR3
F2L Heme-binding protein FPR2, FPR3
SAA Acute-phase protein FPR2
Annexin 1 / lipocortin 1 Glucocorticoid-regulated protein FPR1
Ac1-25 Annexin 1 FPR1, FPR2, FPR3
Ac2–26 Annexin 1 FPR1, FPR2, FPR3
Ac9–25 Annexin 1 FPR1, FPR2
Antiflammin-2 (AF2) Annexin 1 FPR2
Aβ (1–42) Amyloid precursor FPR2
D2D3 uPAR (88–274) FPR2
SRSRYp D2D3 FPR1
LL-37 Cathelicidin FPR2
PrP (106–126) Prion protein FPR2
Temporin A Rana temporaria FPR2
PACAP27 Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide FPR2
Agonists from peptide library
WKYMVm Peptide library FPR1, FPR2, FPR3
WKYMVM Peptide library FPR2, FPR3
MMK-1 Peptide library FPR2
MMWLL, formyl-MMWLL Peptide library FPR1
CGEN-855A Peptide library FPR2
Nonpeptides
Host-derived nonpeptides
Lipoxin A4 and aspirin-triggered lipoxins Eicosanoids FPR2, AhR
Agonists from nonpeptide library
Quinazolinone derivative (Quin-C1) Combinatorial library FPR1, FPR2
Pyrazolone, 4-iodo-substituted, no. 43 Combinatorial library FPR1, FPR2
AG-14 Drug-like molecule library FPR1
Compound 1 and 2 Arylcarboxylic acid hydrazide derivatives FPR2
Others
PD168368
PD176252
Trp-and Phe-based analogs
Related nonpeptide/nonpeptoid analogs
A-71623
Gastrin-releasing
peptide/neuromedin B receptors (BB1/BB2)
PD168368/ PD176252
PD168368/ PD176252
Cholecystokinin-1 receptor agonist
FPR1, FPR2,
FPR1, FPR2, FPR3
FPR1, FPR2, FPR3
FPR1, FPR2

Peptides

Microbial Peptides

Synthetic or E. coli-derived fMLF is most widely used to characterize the function of FPR1 and FPR2. The chemotactic activity of fMLF for neutrophils is increased by an oligoethylene glycol substituent.16 In addition to its chemotactic activity for myeloid cells, fMLF also induces intestinal epithelial cell migration and participates in epithelial restitution and wound closure.32 The activity of fMLF on intestinal epithelial cells is attributed to FPR1, which is located along actin filaments in lamellipodial and filopodial extrusions associated with activated PI3K, Rac1, and Cdc42.32 In human mesenchymal stem cells, fMLF stimulates signaling pathways coupled to FPR1 that drive phospholipase C (PLC)/phospholipase D (PLD)-Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase II-ERK-CREB during osteogenic differentiation. By contrast, fMLF inhibits the expression of PPARγ1 and suppresses adipocytic commitment during differentiation.28 Thus, FPR1 and its agonist fMLF also display important functions in nonhematopoietic cells. In addition to fMLF, there are other N-formyl peptides derived from bacteria. For example, a pentapeptide fMIVIL from L. monocytogenes and a tetrapeptide fMIFL from Staphylococcus aureus preferentially activate mFPR1.32 fMFEDAVAWF derived from Mycobacterium avium also activates FPR1.32

Although formylated peptides are believed to be mainly of bacterial origin, three hexapeptides fMLKLIV, fMMYALF, and fMFADRW corresponding to the N terminus of mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunits 4 and 6 and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I32 are also potent chemotactic agonists for FPR1 and FPR2. Other mitochondrial N-formyl peptides (e.g. mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) released during cell necrosis) also activate monocytes to release IL-8 (CXCL8), a neutrophil specific chemokine.4

Mitochondria are considered to be evolutionary endosymbionts derived from bacteria and may thus contain bacterial molecular motifs. On cell injury, mitochondrial “damage”-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are released into the circulation and elicit neutrophil-mediated organ injury. The effect of mitochondrial DAMPs (MTDs) containing formyl peptides on neutrophils is mediated by FPR1, while mitochondrial DNA in MTDs activates Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9.34 Some functional “cryptic” peptides hidden in protein structures are termed “cryptides,” one of which, mitocryptide-2 (MCT-2) in mitochondrial cytochrome b, was a specific agonist for FPR2 and may play a role in inflammatory host responses.27

Non-formylated Peptides

Many peptides without N-formyl group have been identified as agonists for FPRs. A Helicobacter pylori peptide Hp (2–20) activates FPR2 and FPR3 and may contribute to the development of pyloritis by the recruitment of monocytes and basophils to the gastric mucosa in response to bacterial infection.19 Hp (2–20) also induces the migration, proliferation, and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in gastric epithelial cells, suggesting that this H. pylori peptide may promote gastric mucosal healing.32

HIV-1 envelope proteins contain segments capable of interacting with either or both FPR1 and FPR2, including at least three domains in gp41, as well as two sequences from gp120. Although T20/DP178 from gp41 specifically activates human FPR1 in vitro 19 and the murine FPR1 homolog mFPR1 in vivo, T21/DP107 from gp41 uses both FPR1 and FPR2 with higher efficacy on FPR2. N36 from gp41, which partially overlaps with T21/DP107, solely signals through FPR2.32 Two peptide domains in HIV-1 gp120 are potent chemoattractants and activators for FPR2, but not for FPR1, in human phagocytic leukocytes.3 One peptide domain, F peptide, consists of 20-amino acid residues and is located in the C4–V4 region of gp120 of the HIV-1 LAI strain. Another peptide of 33 amino acids (V3 peptide) is derived from a linear sequence of the V3 region of the HIV-1 MN strain.3 However, despite the existence of peptide domains in HIV-1 envelope proteins that interact with FPRs, it remains unclear whether such domains are released by enzymatic cleavage of the envelope proteins in vivo during HIV-1 infection.

In addition to peptides from HIV protein, there are also some other viral proteins containing sequences that act as FPR ligands. gG-2p20, derived from Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), is a chemoattractant for both monocytes and neutrophils by activating FPR1.32 It is noteworthy that an HKU coronavirus peptide, MYVKWPWYVWL, is a potent antagonist, but N-formyl-MYVKWPWYVWL is a potent agonist for FPR1,32 suggesting the importance of N-terminal modification in the biological activity of a synthetic peptide.

Host-Derived Peptides

Peptides Associated with Amyloidogenic Diseases

At least 3 amyloidogenic polypeptides associated with chronic inflammation and amyloidosis have been identified as agonists for FPR2. They are serum amyloid A (SAA), β amyloid peptide Aβ42, and PrP106–126.

SAA, an acute-phase protein, increases in serum by as much as 1000-fold in inflammatory diseases, e.g. trauma, infection, and other environmental stress.32 Recombinant human SAA as the first mammalian host-derived peptide ligand identified for FPR219 is chemotactic for myeloid cells and T lymphocytes. In synovial tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), highly expressed SAA promotes the proliferation of human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) and induces the expression of matrix metalloproteinases by FLS.32 SAA also protects RA FLS from apoptotic death induced by serum starvation, anti-Fas IgM, and sodium nitroprusside32 by interacting with FPR2. In addition, SAA stimulates CCL-2 production via FPR2 by human umbilical vein endothelial cells and monocytes contributing to the progression of atherosclerosis.21., 22. SAA also stimulates M-CSF and CCL-2 expression in human and mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cells.23 SAA may interact with other receptors; the nucleotide receptor P2X7 was reported to mediate the protective role of SAA in human neutrophil apoptosis.1

42 is a 42-amino acid cleavage product of the amyloid precursor protein in the brain and a pathogenic factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).19 FPR2 mediates the migration and activation of monocytic phagocytes, including macrophages and brain microglia, induced by Aβ42. FPR2 also promotes the endocytosis of Aβ42 by macrophages and microglia in the form of receptor and ligand complexes. If the exposure of macrophages to Aβ42 is transient, the internalized Aβ42 is degraded and FPR2 is rapidly recycled back to the cell surface. However, prolonged exposure results in accumulation of Aβ42 and FPR2 complexes in macrophages, which culminates in progressive fibrillary aggregation of Aβ42 and the macrophage death.3 These observations suggest that FPR2 not only mediates the proinflammatory activity of Aβ42 but it may also play an important role in the fibrillary deposition of Aβ42, a typical pathologic feature of AD.3

PrP106–126 is a prion protein fragment that is produced in human brains with prion disease.19 PrP106–126 induces the migration and activation of human myeloid cells through FPR2 and may thus contribute to the inflammatory responses seen in the prion disease.

Although the interaction of FPRs with peptide agonists in general elicits proinflammatory responses, FPR2 may exert a neuroprotective effect by recognizing a small peptide, humanin (HN), which was identified through a functional expression screening based on its ability to suppress neuronal cell death seen in familial AD.32 HN is chemotactic for monocytes through the use of FPR2 and by competitive blockage of FPR2 abrogates the intracellular fibrillary aggregation of Aβ42. In neuronal cells, HN protects the cells from apoptosis induced by Aβ42. Thus, FPR2 may transduce life and death signals in neuronal cells depending on the nature of the agonists it encounters and may determine the outcome of AD. However, it has also been reported that HN-mediated protection of F11 neurohybrid cells is mediated through tyrosine kinases and STATs which are unlikely coupled to FPR2.32

Peptides Associated with Inflammatory and Antibacterial Responses

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator18 is a serine protease known for its ability to regulate fibrinolysis. uPA is required for leukocyte trafficking to sites of inflammation in vivo, and it indirectly activates FPR2 through the liberation of a chemotactic peptide D2D388–274 from uPA receptor (uPAR) (CD87).19 Consistent with this, the presence of both uPAR and FPR2 on the cell surface is required for the chemotactic activity of uPA, whereas FPR2 alone is sufficient for the effect of D2D388–274. Thus, uPAR may facilitate fibrinolysis and serve as a source of chemotactic proinflammatory peptides necessary for host defense. SRSRY, a peptide corresponding to residues 88–92 in uPAR is an agonist of FPR1.32 In addition, uPAR84–95 induces basophil migration by interacting with both FPR2 and FPR3 and mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells by activating FPR1 by desensitizing the chemokine receptor CXCR4.32

FPRs interact with some bactericidal peptides contained in human neutrophil granules. LL37, an enzymatic cleavage fragment of neutrophil granule protein cathelicidin and its mouse homolog CRAMP (see the Cathelicin Chapters in Bacterial/Antibiotic Peptides section of this book), activate FPR2 to promote myeloid cell chemotaxis.32 LL-37 also induces angiogenesis via FPR2 expressed on endothelial cells. In CRAMP-deficient mice, neovascularization is decreased during cutaneous wound repair.32 Another antibacterial neutrophil granule protein, cathepsin G, is a serine protease (see the Peptide Biosynthesis/Processing section of this book) and a specific agonist for FPR1.32 It is therefore conceivable that the capacity of antimicrobial neutrophil granule peptides to interact with FPRs may aid in the recruitment of phagocytic leukocytes to the sites of infection and thus accelerate the killing and clearance of the invading bacteria.

FPR2 has also been reported to interact with a chemokine variant (CKβ8) that activates phagocytic leukocytes. CKβ8 (CCL23/MPIF-1) uses a typical GPCR, CCR1, for its leukocyte chemotactic activity. However, an N-terminal truncation product of the CKβ8 splice variant CKβ8-1 (22–137 aa) activates myeloid cells and FPR2-transfected cell lines at low nanomolar concentration range and is thus considered one of the most potent FPR2 agonists identified so far.3 However, the cell sources of CKβ8 and the circumstances for its release in vivo remain unclear. Interestingly, an 18-amino acid peptide from CKβ8, SHAAG, activates FPR2 activity but not CCR1, revealing a structural basis for the receptor specificity of CKβ8.25

Annexin I (Anx A1) and its N-Terminal Peptides

It is intriguing that some FPR agonists have dual roles in inflammatory responses. Anx A1, also named lipocortin I, is a glucocorticoid-regulated, phosphorylated-binding protein possessing both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory activity mediated in part by FPR1. Expressed in a variety of cell types, Anx A1 is particularly abundant in neutrophils where it is located on the outer cell surface and serves to inhibit neutrophil transendothelial migration. At low concentrations, Anx A1 and its N-terminal peptides (Ac2–26 and Ac9–25) elicit Ca2+ transients through FPR1 to desensitize neutrophils and inhibit its transendothelial migration induced by the chemokine IL-8 (CXCL8).32 At high concentrations, the Anx A1 peptides activate neutrophils as potent proinflammatory stimulants. The antimigratory activity of exogenous and endogenous Anx A1 has been shown in both acute and chronic models of inflammation. More recent studies revealed that Anx A1 peptides may also use FPR2 and, to a lesser extent, FPR3, suggesting a complex role for FPRs in Anx A1–mediated regulation of host responses. In addition to neutrophils, Anx A1 also regulates T cell receptor30 signaling. Stimulation of T cells via TCR leads to the secretion of endogenous Anx A1 and a simultaneous externalization of its receptor FPR2 on the plasma membrane, highlighting a “coordinated” signaling of “Anx A1FPR” system.5 In the presence of Anx A1, naive T cells differentiate toward Th1 cells, whereas Anx-A1-deficient T cells produce high levels of Th2 cytokines.5., 7. Also, in Anx A1-deficient T cells, the production of IL-17 as well as FPR2 signaling is impaired during differentiation in Th17-skewing conditions.6 In addition, tumor growth and metastasis are markedly decreased in Anx A1-KO mice, whereas the survival and tumor necrosis are significantly increased, due to impaired angiogenesis.33 These observations demonstrate a complex role of Anx A1 and FPR2 in multiple pathophysiological processes.

Frog Skin Peptides (see Amphibian/Skin Peptides Section of this Book)

Temporin A (TA) is a frog-derived antimicrobial peptide that was found to induce the migration of human monocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages.32 Characterization of the signaling characteristics of TA in monocytes and the use of receptor transfected HEK293 epithelial cell line revealed that this peptide uses FPR2 as a receptor. TA is also chemotactic in vivo, because it elicited infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes into the injection site in mice. Another temporin peptide Rana-6 is chemotactic for human phagocytes also by using FPR2. Thus, frog-derived temporins have the capacity to chemoattract phagocytes through human FPR2 and the mouse homolog mFPR2, suggesting the participation of amphibian antimicrobial peptides in host innate immunity. Because the expression of FPR homolog(s) has not been reported in species other than mammals, it will be interesting to clarify whether such receptor exists in amphibians and other species such as insects, which normally rely on the secretion of antimicrobial peptides as a natural host defense.3

Other Host-Derived Peptides

It is important that highly efficacious agonist peptide for FPR3 has been isolated from spleen extracts. F2L, an acetylated amino-terminal 21-amino acid peptide, is derived from the cleavage of the human heme-binding protein, an intracellular tetrapyrolle-binding protein. F2L chemoattracts and activates monocyte-derived DCs, thus seems to be a novel and unique natural chemoattractant peptide for FPR3 in DCs and monocytes, in agreement with the selective expression of FPR3 in these cells,32 suggesting its role in linking innate and adaptive immune responses by activating antigen-presenting FPR3+ DCs, which express reduced levels of FPR1 and FPR2. In mice, mouse F2L activates neutrophils by using mFPR2, a homolog of human FPR2, because neutrophils from mFPR2−/− mice lost all responsiveness to F2L. These results suggest that mFPR2 in mice is likely a homolog of both human FPR2 and FPR3.2

Agonists from Peptide Library

Random small peptide libraries are rich sources of FPR agonists and have yielded a number of potent chemotactic stimulants for leukocytes. For instance, WKYMVm, a hexapeptide representing a modified sequence isolated from a random peptide library, was initially reported to be an efficacious stimulant of human B lymphocytes, monocytic cell lines, as well as peripheral blood neutrophils. It was subsequently found that WKYMVm uses both FPR1 and FPR2, and is by far the most potent peptide agonist for FPR2 to chemoattract and activate human phagocytic cells.32 The WKYMVm analog, produced by converting the D-amino acid methionine at the C-terminus into to an L-amino acid, becomes a more selective agonist of FPR2 and also a weaker activator of FPR3.3 Another peptide, MMK-1, which is also derived from a random peptide library, is a potent and very selective chemotactic agonist for FPR2. Although FPR agonists identified in random peptide libraries seem not to be pathophysiologically relevant to diseases, they nevertheless constitute useful pharmacological tools for the studies of FPR signaling pathways, structural basis of the ligands versus receptors, and identification of receptor antagonists that could be valuable in conditions resulted from receptor overactivation.

Nonpeptides

Host-derived Nonpeptide FPR Agonists

LXA4, biosynthesized from arachidonic acid metabolism, is the first described endogenous lipid ligand for FPR2. However, despite the original observation of LXA4 being a chemotactic agonist for FPR2, this lipid metabolite has been shown to mainly exert inhibitory activities on a variety of inflammatory responses. LXA4 inhibits the production of inflammatory cytokines by epithelial cell lines in response to TNFα and LPS, while it simulates the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.32 In DCs, LXA4/ATL activates the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-2 and in T cells, LXA4 attenuates TNFα release by impairing ERK signaling.32 LXA4 also prevents renal fibrosis by inhibiting PDGF-induced TGF-β production in mesangial cells.32 In addition, LXA4 attenuates inflammation-induced pain and displays proresolution properties in various disease models, including dermal inflammation, ischemia/reperfusion injury, peritonitis, colitis, cystic fibrosis, asthma, parasitic infection and glomerulonephritis.32 The multiplicity of the anti-inflammatory activity of LXA4 raises the question of how this lipid mediator shares FPR2 with other peptide agonists that trigger a proinflammatory signaling pathway. One plausible explanation was that LXA4 binds to an FPR2 domain, which is different from the domains utilized by peptide agonists. However, because LXA4 has been reported to interact with multiple receptors depending on the cell types, it remains to be clarified whether the biological function of LXA4 is the consequence of interaction with more than one receptor.

Agonists from Small Compound Library

In addition to recognizing peptide agonists and the lipid agonist LXA4, nonpeptide small compounds may also be recognized by FPRs. For instance, a quinazolinone derivative Quin-C1 was reported as a highly selective agonist for FPR2.32 High-throughput screening of compound library has yielded compound 43 that reduces inflammation in an ear swelling model in mice through FPR2, but it was later shown as a preferential agonist for FPR1 that activates neutrophils.14 In addition, AG-14 was found to activate neutrophils by using FPR1.32 Compounds 1 and 2, arylcarboxylic acid hydrazide derivatives, are agonists for FPR2 that induce the production of TNFα by macrophages.32

Others

PD168368 and PD176252, antagonists of gastrin-releasing peptide/neuromedin B receptors (BB1/BB2), are potent agonists of both FPR1 and FPR2.26 Their Trp-and Phe-based analogs and related nonpeptide/nonpeptoid analogs are also agonists of FPRs.26 In addition, the cholecystokinin-1 receptor agonist A-71623 activates both FPR1 and FPR2.26 These physiologically relevant nonpeptide agonists for FPRs may contribute to the regulation of inflammation and immune responses. The similarities and divergence of their binding domains in FPRs and signal transduction pathways as compared with that of peptide agonists will be of great pathophysiological and pharmacological interests.

FPR Antagonists

The importance of FPRs in microbial infection and host immune responses suggests that these GPCRs may be targets of pharmacological intervention to attenuate complications associated with undesirable receptor overactivation. This consideration leads to the search and development of FPR antagonists, which have yielded many molecules as listed in Table 2 .

TABLE 2.

FPR Antagonists

Antagonists Origin Receptors
Microbial antagonists
Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of S. aureus (CHIPS) Staphylococcus aureus FPR1
FPRL1-inhibitor protein (FLIPr) Staphylococcus aureus FPR1, FPR2
Cyclosporin A (CsA) Fungi FPR1
Cyclosporin H (CsH) Fungi FPR1
HKU coronavirus peptides Coronavirus FPR1
Coronavirus 229E peptides Coronavirus FPR1
SARS coronavirus peptides Coronavirus FPR1
HIV-1 peptides HIV-1 FPR1
HIV-2 peptides HIV-2 FPR1
Ebola peptide Ebola virus FPR1
LDLLDL Retrovirus FPR1
Synthetic peptide antagonists
i-Boc-MLF Synthetic peptide FPR1
t-Boc-MLF (Boc1) Synthetic peptide FPR1
t-Boc-FLFLF (Boc2) Synthetic peptide FPR1, FPR2
Trp-Arg-Trp-Trp-Trp-Trp (WRW4) Random peptide library FPR1
PBP10 Gelsolin FPR2
Host-derived antagonists
Spinorphin Bovine spinal cord FPR1
Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) Endogenous (bile acid) FPR1, FPR2
Deoxycholic acid (DCA) Endogenous (bile acid) FPR1
Others
Piroxicam Nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSDAIDs) FPR1
SDS Amphiphile FPR1

Microbial FPR Antagonists

Cyclosporin H (CsH) produced by a fungus is an inverse agonist (negative antagonist) that suppresses the constitutive activity of FPR1.19 Similar to CsH, CsA also inhibits fMLF-induced neutrophil degranulation and cell activation, although the inhibitory effect is less potent than CsH. FPR2-inhibitor protein (FLIPr), a staphylococcal anti-inflammatory protein, directly binds to FPR1 and FPR2 and attenuates fMLF-induced cell activation.32 At low concentrations, FLIPr selectively inhibits the binding of some FPR2 agonists including MMK-1, WKYMVM, PrP (106–126), and Aβ42. At high concentrations, it reduces fMLF binding to FPR1.32 Iodinated chemotaxis inhibitory protein of S. aureus (CHIPS) is a potent peptide antagonist of FPR1.32 LDLLDL is an immunosuppressive hexapeptide derived from retroviral trans-membrane envelope protein p15E and is a specific FPR1 antagonist.20 Peptides derived from the membrane proximal region of fusion proteins from HIV 1 and 2, Coronavirus 229 E, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and Ebola virus are all potent antagonists of FPR1.32 These observations suggest the capacity of microbia to produce molecules that inhibit FPR-mediated function of host cells that are directly involved in antimicrobial responses.

Host-derived Antagonists

Several “endogenous” FPR antagonists have been reported. Deoxycholic acid (DCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) identified as antagonists for FPR1 with unclear pathophysiological significance. CDCA also partially inhibits FPR2 agonist-induced myeloid cell activation. Spinorphin (LVVYPWT), which belongs to the family of hemorphins, is a peptide antagonist for FPR1.32 In addition, Quin-C7, a synthetic nonpeptide compound, is a highly selective antagonist for FPR2. Interestingly, Quin-C7 is derived from FPR2 agonist Quin-C1 through chemical modification.32

Synthetic Peptide Antagonists

Boc1 (t-Boc-MLF) and Boc2 (t-Boc-FLFLF) were originally found as antagonists for FPR1.11 However, a recent study shows that at low micromolar concentrations, both Boc1 and Boc2 are selective for FPR1; at high micromolar concentrations, Boc2 also partially inhibits the function of FPR2.32 The WRW4 obtained from hexapeptide library is a more selective antagonist for FPR2.29 Further, a cell permeable peptide PBP10, which is derived from a PIP2-binding domain of the cytoskeleton protein gelsolin, displays FPR2 antagonist activity by its ability to penetrate cell membrane to act on the intracellular domains in FPR2.13

Other Antagonists

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSDAID) piroxicam, a nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX)-inhibitor, can reduce neutrophil superoxide production induced by FPR1 agonists but had no significant effect on FPR2-mediated responses. However, piroxicam inhibits WKYMVm-induced neutrophil intracellular calcium mobilization and superoxide release when the drug was combined with the FPR2 specific antagonist WRW4.32 The inhibitory effect of piroxicam is dependent on its binding to the receptor, therefore seems to be FPR specific.

Perspectives

In this chapter, we attempted to provide a comprehensive overview of FPR ligands including agonists and antagonists. It is now clear that FPRs play important roles in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses. The process of understanding of the biological roles of FPRs has been considerably prompted by the identification of a variety of ligands from different sources, in particular, from microbes and human. In addition to the evidence that the FPRs are involved in antimicrobial defense and inflammation, they are also implicated in the progression of cancer. For example, FPR1 is selectively expressed by highly malignant human glioma cells and increases the motility, growth, and angiogenesis of human glioblastoma by interacting with host-derived agonist(s) released by necrotic tumor cells.35 An effort to identify potential FPR1 agonist(s) in glioma cell supernatant revealed Anx A1 as a major component.31 Therefore, FPR1 and Anx A1 axis may constitute targets for novel antiglioma therapy. Human FPR2 is also expressed in astrocytoma cell line,9 hepatocellar carcinoma,23 and breast cancer17 with yet unclear pathophysiological implications.

It is intriguing that FPR1 and FPR2 exhibit a promiscuity to interact with a broad range of ligands that do not share significant primary or tertiary structure similarities. How a single FPR could bind such a diverse array of ligands, from small peptides to nonpeptide compounds, remains to be elucidated, possibly through classical receptor chimera approaches and site-directed mutagenesis. Further investigation should not only benefit better understanding of the role of FPRs and their ligands in disease states but also the identification of pharmacological targets for the development of therapeutic agents.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Joost J Oppenheim for reviewing the chapter and Sondra Sheriff and Cheryl Fogle-Lamb for secretarial assistance. This work was supported in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E and was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NCI, NIH.

References

  • 1.Bjorkman L., Karlsson J., Karlsson A., Rabiet M.J., Boulay F., Fu H. Serum amyloid A mediates human neutrophil production of reactive oxygen species through a receptor independent of formyl peptide receptor like-1. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83:245–253. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0607-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen K., Le Y., Liu Y., Gong W., Ying G., Huang J. A critical role for the G protein-coupled receptor mFPR2 in airway inflammation and immune responses. J Immunol. 2010;184:3331–3335. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen K., Wang J.M. Chemotactic peptide ligands for formylpeptide receptors influencing inflammation. Handbook of biologically active peptides. 2006;78:547–552. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crouser E.D., Shao G., Julian M.W., Macre J.E., Shadel G.S., Tridandapani S. Monocyte activation by necrotic cells is promoted by mitochondrial proteins and formyl peptide receptors. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2000–2009. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a001ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D’Acquisto F., Merghani A., Lecona E., Rosignoli G., Raza K., Buckley C.D. Annexin-1 modulates T-cell activation and differentiation. Blood. 2007;109:1095–1102. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-022798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.D’Acquisto F., Paschalidis N., Sampaio A.L., Merghani A., Flower R.J., Perretti M. Impaired T cell activation and increased Th2 lineage commitment in Annexin-1-deficient T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:3131–3142. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.D’Acquisto F., Perretti M., Flower R.J. Annexin-A1: a pivotal regulator of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;155:152–169. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Santo C., Arscott R., Booth S., Karydis I., Jones M., Asher R. Invariant NKT cells modulate the suppressive activity of IL-10-secreting neutrophils differentiated with serum amyloid A. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:1039–1046. doi: 10.1038/ni.1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Decker Y., McBean G., Godson C. Lipoxin A4 inhibits IL-1beta-induced IL-8 and ICAM-1 expression in 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;296:C1420–C1427. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00380.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Devosse T., Guillabert A., D’Haene N., Berton A., De Nadai P., Noel S. Formyl peptide receptor-like 2 is expressed and functional in plasmacytoid dendritic cells, tissue-specific macrophage subpopulations, and eosinophils. J Immunol. 2009;182:4974–4984. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dufton N., Perretti M. Therapeutic anti-inflammatory potential of formyl-peptide receptor agonists. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;127:175–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El Zein N., D’Hondt S., Sariban E. Crosstalks between the receptors tyrosine kinase EGFR and TrkA and the GPCR, FPR, in human monocytes are essential for receptors-mediated cell activation. Cell Signal. 2010;22:1437–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Forsman H., Dahlgren C. The FPR2-induced rise in cytosolic calcium in human neutrophils relies on an emptying of intracellular calcium stores and is inhibited by a gelsolin-derived PIP2-binding peptide. BMC Cell Biol. 2010;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forsman H., Onnheim K., Andreasson E., Dahlgren C. What formyl peptide receptors, if any, are triggered by compound 43 and Lipoxin A(4)? Scand J Immunol. 2011;74:227–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang J., Hu J., Bian X., Chen K., Gong W., Dunlop N.M. Transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor by formylpeptide receptor exacerbates the malignant behavior of human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5906–5913. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jiarpinitnun C., Kiessling L.L. Unexpected enhancement in biological activity of a GPCR ligand induced by an oligoethylene glycol substituent. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8844–8845. doi: 10.1021/ja102640c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khau T., Langenbach S.Y., Schuliga M., Harris T., Johnstone C.N., Anderson R.L. Annexin-1 signals mitogen-stimulated breast tumor cell proliferation by activation of the formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) 1 and 2. FASEB J. 2011;25:483–496. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-154096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koczulla R., von Degenfeld G., Kupatt C., Krotz F., Zahler S., Gloe T. An angiogenic role for the human peptide antibiotic LL-37/hCAP-18. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1665–1672. doi: 10.1172/JCI17545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Le Y., Murphy P.M., Wang J.M. Formyl-peptide receptors revisited. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:541–548. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02316-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Le Y., Wang J.M., Liu X., Kong Y., Hou X., Ruan L. Biological active peptides interacting with the G protein-coupled formylpeptide receptors. Protein Peptide Lett. 2007;14:846–853. doi: 10.2174/092986607782110211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee H.Y., Kim S.D., Shim J.W., Lee S.Y., Lee H., Cho K.H. Serum amyloid A induces CCL2 production via formyl peptide receptor-like 1-mediated signaling in human monocytes. J Immunol. 2008;181:4332–4339. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.4332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee H.Y., Kim S.D., Shim J.W., Yun J., Kim K., Bae Y.S. Activation of formyl peptide receptor like-1 by serum amyloid A induces CCL2 production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;380:313–317. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Y., Cai L., Wang H., Wu P., Gu W., Chen Y. Pleiotropic regulation of macrophage polarization and tumorigenesis by formyl peptide receptor-2. Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McDonald B., Pittman K., Menezes G.B., Hirota S.A., Slaba I., Waterhouse C.C. Intravascular danger signals guide neutrophils to sites of sterile inflammation. Science. 2010;330:362–366. doi: 10.1126/science.1195491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miao Z., Premack B.A., Wei Z., Wang Y., Gerard C., Showell H. Proinflammatory proteases liberate a discrete high-affinity functional FPRL1 (CCR12) ligand from CCL23. J Immunol. 2007;178:7395–7404. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schepetkin I.A., Kirpotina L.N., Khlebnikov A.I., Jutila M.A., Quinn M.T. Gastrin-releasing peptide/neuromedin B receptor antagonists PD176252, PD168368, and related analogs are potent agonists of human formyl-peptide receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;79:77–90. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.068288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seki T., Fukamizu A., Kiso Y., Mukai H. Mitocryptide-2, a neutrophil-activating cryptide, is a specific endogenous agonist for formyl-peptide receptor-like 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;404:482–487. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shin M.K., Jang Y.H., Yoo H.J., Kang D.W., Park M.H., Kim M.K. N-Formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (FMLP) promotes osteoblast differentiation via the n-formyl peptide receptor 1-mediated signaling pathway in human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:17133–17143. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.197772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stenfeldt A.L., Karlsson J., Wenneras C., Bylund J., Fu H., Dahlgren C. Boc-MLF and Boc-FLFLF are antagonists that preferentially inhibit activity triggered through the formyl peptide receptor. Inflammation. 2007;30:224–229. doi: 10.1007/s10753-007-9040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stone R.A., Quinn G.E., Francis E.L., Ying G.S., Flitcroft D.I., Parekh P. Diurnal axial length fluctuations in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:63–70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang Y., Liu Y., Yao X., Ping Y., Jiang T., Liu Q. Annexin 1 released by necrotic human glioblastoma cells stimulates tumor cell growth through the formyl peptide receptor 1. Am J Pathol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ye R.D., Boulay F., Wang J.M., Dahlgren C., Gerard C., Parmentier M. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIII. Nomenclature for the formyl peptide receptor (FPR) family. Pharmacol Rev. 2009;61:119–161. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.001578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yi M., Schnitzer J.E. Impaired tumor growth, metastasis, angiogenesis and wound healing in annexin A1-null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17886–17891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901324106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang Q., Raoof M., Chen Y., Sumi Y., Sursal T., Junger W. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464:104–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou Y., Bian X., Le Y., Gong W., Hu J., Zhang X. Formylpeptide receptor FPR and the rapid growth of malignant human gliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:823–835. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES