Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Nov 19;35(6):150960. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150960

The Roles of Nurses in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Leukemia in Older Adults

Alex J Fauer 1,3, Sung Won Choi 2,3, Christopher R Friese 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC7150366  NIHMSID: NIHMS1562872  PMID: 31753706

Abstract

Objective.

To review and summarize nurses’ roles in the care of the older adult undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for the treatment of leukemia.

Data sources.

Published literature indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, textbooks, and clinical expertise.

Conclusion.

Nurses are a vital component of the highly-specialized care delivered before, during, and after an allogeneic HCT.

Implications for nursing practice:

Nurses who are prepared for the complex HCT care trajectory will be able to optimally meet the complex needs of the older adult patient and their caregiver(s).

Keywords: Registered nurses, hematopoietic cell transplantation, older adults, antineoplastic agents, leukemia

Introduction

An allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the principal curative therapy for malignant hematologic conditions, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL).13 Historically, older adults (i.e., age ≥ 65) had not been considered good candidates for HCT because age is a reliable prognostic indicator of transplant success.4 However, recent data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) support the use of HCT in fit older adults. The number of older adults who received allogeneic HCT has nearly doubled over the last decade.4,5

Among older adults, survival after two or more years following allogeneic HCT is improving, potentially due to better HLA-matching of unrelated graft donors, improved prophylactic regimens for graft versus host disease (GVHD), and less toxic (i.e., reduced intensity) conditioning regimens.6 One study estimated the cumulative incidences of 2-year and 5-year relapse-free survival among older patients with AML who received allogeneic HCT to be approximately 47% and 35%, respectively.7 Another study estimated the 3-year overall survival rates for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic HCT with matched sibling donors and matched unrelated donors were 55% and 45%, respectively.8 Although these survival rate estimates are not excellent, older adults with acute leukemias may experience meaningful, disease-free years to their lives following allogeneic HCT.

Nurses who work in transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) and hematology/oncology settings play a vital role in the assessment, delivery of interventions, and education during the HCT trajectory. The patient acuity in TCT settings is high due to several factors, including management of multiple intravenous (IV) medications, parenteral nutrition, psychosocial factors, and labile patient stability throughout transplant.9 Nurses who are new to TCT settings will benefit from understanding the complex nature of HCT in older adult patients, including: geriatric oncology considerations; the common acute symptoms and outcomes of HCT; and the transition to survivorship and palliative care.

The purpose of this paper is to review and summarize nurses’ various roles during the care of older adult patients being treated for leukemia with HCT, by summarizing the current published, peer-reviewed literature. The authors retrieved the literature for this review through PubMed, CINAHL, textbooks, and inpatient clinical practice guidelines.

Conditioning Considerations for Older Adults Receiving HCT

There are two kinds of hematopoietic cell transplantations: autologous, and allogeneic transplants.10 See Table 1 for a brief overview of HCT classifications, malignant diseases treated, and donor source. For the remainder of this paper, we will focus on the context of TCT nursing for allogeneic HCT.

Table 1.

Classifications of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Classification Description Malignant Diseases treated Donor
Autologous Infusion of the patient’s harvested hematopoietic stem cells from marrow collection or peripheral blood prior to receiving induction chemotherapy Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Hodgkin lymphoma*
Multiple Myeloma
Patient
Allogeneic Infusion of hematopoietic stem cells from a donor which were obtained by collecting peripheral blood, marrow, or umbilical cord blood Acute Leukemias
Chronic Leukemias
Myelofibrosis
Myelodysplastic
Syndrome
Hairy cell leukemia
Hodgkin lymphoma**
Typically, HLA-matched sibling or matched unrelated donor (MUD)
Haploidentical A type of allogeneic transplant. Think “haplo” for “half match” for the patient. Acute Leukemias
Chronic Leukemias
Myelofibrosis
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Hairy cell leukemia
Hodgkin lymphoma**
Typically, parents, children, siblings

Abbreviations: HLA, human leukocyte antigen.

Definitions obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) dictionary of cancer terms10 and Kimmel Cancer Center13

*

Hodgkin lymphoma with no advancement to bone marrow

**

Hodgkin lymphoma relapse following autologous HCT or advancement to bone marrow

Conditioning is a phase during the pre-HCT period where high-dose chemotherapy—and sometimes total body irradiation (TBI)—are administered to the patient to suppress the rapidly-dividing, malignant blood cells prior to donor stem cell transfusion.11 The prescribed chemotherapy regimen for HCT patients is generally specific to the classifications of HCT indicated, malignancy, and if the patient will receive full- or reduced-intensity conditioning chemotherapy. Typically, there is a period of “rest day(s)” between conditioning chemotherapy and stem cell transfusion. The goals of conditioning chemotherapy prior to HCT are to achieve adequate immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection.12 See Table 2 for selected conditioning regimens for allogeneic HCT. In TCT settings, days are usually counted in reference to the day of transplant, or “Day 0”. The sample conditioning regimens in Table 2 will be administered during days −7 to −1.

Table 2.

Selected conditioning chemotherapy and TBI regimens prior to HCT for treatment of leukemia

Regimen Drugs Days of Cycle relative to day of transplant (Day 0) Myeloid or Lymphoid Leukemia
Flu-Bu-Cy (low dose) Fludarabine, Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide Flu −7 to −2
Bu −7 to −4
Cy −3 to −2
Myeloid
Flu-Mel-Thio Fludarabine, Melphalan, Thiotepa Thio −7
Mel −6
Flu −5 to −2
Myeloid or Lymphoid
Thio-Flu-Bu Thiotepa, Fludarabine, Busulfan Thio −6 to −5
Flu −4 to −2
Bu −4 to −2
Myeloid
Flu-Cy-TBI Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Total Body Irradiation Flu −6 to −2
Cy-6 to −5
TBI −1
Lymphoid
Flu-TBI (reduced intensity) Fludarabine-Total Body Irradiation Flu −4 to −2
TBI −1
Myeloid

Selected regimens reproduced from Gyurkocza (2014).12

Cycle days obtained from Shabbir-Moosajee et al. (2015),15 and Jethava et al. (2017).17

Older adults may not be physiologically apt to receive full-intensity conditioning chemotherapy regimens due to the increased risk of toxicities.1417 Full-intensity therapy (e.g., myeloablative) may be indicated if reduced-intensity conditioning will not produce adequate myelosuppression for treatment.16 The interprofessional TCT team will carefully consider the risks and benefits of full- vs. reduced-intensity conditioning chemotherapy prior to HCT care planning, and include the patient and caregiver in shared decision-making about the appropriate course of action.18

Frailty and Chemotherapy in Older Adults

High-dose chemotherapy may increase the risk of frailty in certain circumstances.19 Frailty is defined as the physiologic changes associated with aging, characterized by patient-reported fatigue, low physical activity, slow walking speed, and unintentional weight loss, and may pose an increased risk for HCT-related mortality.19,20 There is no single presentation of frailty; two frail patients may present with a range of phenotypes, including weight loss/cachexia, slow gait speed, poor grip strength, and self-reported exhaustion.20,21

In patients with leukemia who are frail, toxicities from chemotherapy may produce more adverse events of treatment than non-frail patients. Frail patients may not tolerate chemotherapy effectively due to age-related renal and hepatic impairment, and drug-to-drug interactions.22 To identify patients who have frailty or may be at risk to develop frailty during the course of conditioning chemotherapy, nurses can consult with the interprofessional TCT team regarding a battery of validated and comprehensive geriatric assessments. Geriatric assessments are focused evaluations of physical performance, frailty, comorbidity, polypharmacy, cognitive performance, and nutritional status that help understand the physiologic effects of aging in older adults prior to HCT.22 Several geriatric assessments can be performed by nurses, including the Geriatric Assessment in Hematology (GAH) Scale, Geriatric 8, and Clinical Frailty Scale.14,23,24 In addition, there are scales used by TCT teams to assess comorbidity in adult patients that are not specific to older age groups, such as the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT)-specific comorbidity index.25 Research has suggested that it is feasible to routinely incorporate geriatric assessment before cancer treatment begins at inpatient and outpatient settings.26 Assessment findings may uncover latent problems that can be managed to avert or reduce treatment-associated toxicity.

Nurses have an important role in assessing the older patient’s tolerance of chemotherapy prior to HCT. This includes performing a comprehensive physical assessment, and asking relevant questions about the patient’s physical functioning, nutritional status, fall risk, and cognitive performance. Since older patients’ physical function can be labile during the HCT trajectory, the nurses’ assessments will be a crucial component of HCT care planning. Assess whether the patient’s condition has changed based on the bedside-report from the previous nurse. It’s also recommended that nursing staff attend the interprofessional TCT care team’s rounds and communicates the status of the patient’s condition frequently, and as their condition changes.18,27

Chemotherapy Administration and Monitoring in HCT

Central Venous Access.

Patients undergoing HCT will have a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted prior to commencing treatment. The CVC is needed to deliver high volumes of blood products and conditioning chemotherapy safely but also provides quick access for blood draws and laboratory tests. Typically, patients will receive a tunneled catheter (e.g., Hickman catheters) or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Chest ports are often not utilized during the pre-transplant phase of HCT.

Since patients will undergo a prolonged period of immunosuppression and myelosuppression during HCT, the risk for a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is notably high. Approximately 9% of patients receiving allogeneic HCT will develop a CLABSI.28,29 Evidence suggests that the most common organism causing a CLABSI is Staphylococcus epidermidis, a bacterium naturally found on the skin.29 Nursing interventions to prevent CLABSI include performing a sterile dressing change if found soiled, wet, or if dried blood is at the insertion site; educating the patient on the use of antimicrobial soap (e.g., chlorhexidine [CHG]) during daily bathing; flushing unused lumens of the CVC with heparin or saline solution, and always performing appropriate hand hygiene.28

We suggest assessing whether specific plans of care or guidelines for CLABSI prevention are in place. It is also necessary to involve the patient’s family caregivers in central line hygiene education, since the CVC may remain in place following discharge after allogeneic HCT.

Pharmacokinetics.

The nurse also plays a pivotal role in assessing the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetics is defined as the study of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs by the body.30 The metabolism of many chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy drugs must be monitored diligently because the therapeutic margins are narrow and potentially dose-limiting. Some conditioning chemotherapy drugs for allogeneic HCT, such as busulfan (Busulfex), require close monitoring and multiple blood draws after the first dose and up to 12-16 hours following infusion.11,31 Examples of other drugs which require diligent serum monitoring, and patient blood draws two to three times per week, are methotrexate, tacrolimus, and vancomycin, among others.31

Chemotherapy safety

In addition to assessing the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy, nurses are responsible for safe handling practices during the administration of chemotherapy drugs. The inherent hazardous, toxic nature of chemotherapy drugs puts nurses and other health care workers at risk of unintended exposure.32 Given that many chemotherapy drugs treat cancer by disrupting the structure and replication of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in malignant and non-malignant cancer cells, even small exposures to chemotherapy drugs (i.e., a few drops of fluid) are harmful to health workers.32,33 Several studies found evidence that nurses and pharmacy workers with occupational exposures to chemotherapy were found to have 50% higher DNA strand breaks than healthy controls.34 Additionally, many myeloablative chemotherapy drugs administered in HCT settings are known carcinogens, including busulfan (Busulfex), cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), melphalan, and thiotepa.32 However, there is no conclusive evidence that nurses with occupational chemotherapy exposures are more likely to develop cancer than nurses with no occupational exposures. Regardless, exposure prevention is essential.

The National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety’s (NIOSH) recommends that personal protective equipment (PPE) must be worn during the preparation, administration, and disposal of chemotherapy drugs and materials.35 We suggest assessing your clinical workplace’s practice guidelines and policies for more details.

Transplant Day Considerations

ABO incompatibility in allogeneic HCT.

A few days prior to transplant, nurses should communicate with the interprofessional TCT team and be aware if ABO incompatibility is known from the HLA matched donor. ABO incompatibility refers to the presence of antibodies, called isoagglutinins, in the recipient’s and/or donor’s A and/or B red blood cell antigens.3638 ABO incompatibility severity is classified as either major, minor, or bidirectional depending on where the isoagglutinins are present. One study estimates that approximately 50% of unrelated donor transplants and 30% of related donor transplants demonstrate some level of ABO incompatibility.36 Therefore, it is likely that nurses will likely care for a patient undergoing allogeneic HCT with ABO incompatibility throughout their career.

Symptoms and adverse effects of ABO incompatibility include acute and delayed hemolysis, non-hemolytic transfusion reaction, and delayed engraftment.36,38 If a patient is known to have ABO incompatibility during HCT, we suggest performing assessments and interventions for acute or delayed transfusion reaction symptoms including fever, chills, shortness of breath, back/flank pain, rigors, and fatigue.39 Communicate with the interprofessional TCT team early and frequently to optimize patient safety and mitigate the worsening of issues.

Transplant day.

The day of allogeneic HCT—often referred to as transplant “Day 0”—is a much-anticipated moment for the patient and their family/support system. The patient will finally receive their related or unrelated stem cells to treat their hematologic cancer. The infusion of bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells through the CVC is very similar to a blood product infusion; the bag and tubing apparatus will vary if bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells.9 The nurse will assemble and prime the transplant tubing, and place emergency equipment (e.g., anaphylaxis kit, suction) at the bedside in the event of a transfusion reaction.9

The nurse will need to assess the scheduled time of transplant to coordinate and plan ahead for their assignment’s workload. Unrelated donor stem cells may be transported by airplane from anywhere in the world, however, delivery time is usually written in the pre-HCT documentation. Related donor stem cells will be collected very close to Day 0, often the same morning or a couple of days prior. The nurse should also assess when the patient’s last dose of chemotherapy was administered. Many conditioning regimens include at least one rest day prior to HCT. If chemotherapy is administered too soon before transplant the efficacy of treatment may be reduced because the drug is still being metabolized by the renal or hepatic systems.40 This assessment is more crucial for autologous HCT but is still good practice for nurses administering allogeneic HCT.

Although Day 0 is highly anticipated, many patients report that the transplant process is “anti-climactic” because the infusion process seems identical to other blood product infusions. Patients may process transplant differently—with excitement or anxiety—nurses can support the patient by allowing them to process this change.

Post-HCT Considerations

Supportive care for symptoms.

Once the HCT is performed, the nurses’ focus of care shifts to the management of chemotherapy toxicities and psychosocial challenges. In the following section, we focus primarily on important symptom management considerations for nurses. Please refer to the other literature in this special edition of Seminars in Oncology Nursing for psychosocial considerations during HCT.

Certain symptoms, or toxicities, of chemotherapy, are expected to occur after receiving myeloablative or myelosuppressing chemotherapy.41 Symptoms may intensify around the period of profound cytopenia called “nadir”, when the neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet counts are the lowest.42,43 See Table 3 for a list of common symptoms and supportive care needs to assess for and intervene.

Table 3.

Common symptoms and supportive care needs during HCT nadir and engraftment

 • Fatigue
 • Nausea
 • Vomiting
 • Diarrhea
 • Neutropenic fever
 • Pain
 • Constipation
 • Mucositis (and/or esophagitis, stomatitis)
 • Rash (and/or engraftment syndrome)
 • Decreased appetite
 • Changes with taste
 • Insomnia
 • Difficulty with concentration and memory (i.e., chemo brain)
 • Anxiety
 • Depressive symptoms

We recommend using published resources for oncology nurses to guide assessments and interventions during this phase of HCT. One resource to consider is a cancer symptom management pocket guide for nurses by Irwin & Johnson.58

Between nadir and engraftment, nurses are responsible for assessing fatigue, shortness of breath, bleeding, unsteady gait, and the overall patient condition in relation to the patient’s hemoglobin and platelet counts. Determine the need for blood products (i.e., packed red blood cells, platelets), fall precautions, careful oral hygiene, and protective precautions as medically indicated. The nurse will typically administer granulocyte colony stimulating factor (g-CSF) drugs (e.g., tbo-Filgrastim [Granix®]) by subcutaneous injection to shorten the time from neutropenia to engraftment, and reduce the risk of neutropenic fevers.44

Patients with mucositis will need adequate pain management with oral or intravenous analgesics to successfully maintain proper nutrition. Nurses can work with a registered dietitian (RD) or other dietary experts in the TCT team to recommend non-irritating foods and fluids in this circumstance. Oral intake and daily weight recordings should be assessed with each patient encounter. For at-risk patients, a strict multi-day caloric intake diary might be ordered. For patients with severe mucositis, stomatitis, and/or esophagitis, the physician will place orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with or without lipids for nutritional needs. Additional considerations for nursing care of a patient requiring TPN with lipids include frequent assessment of blood glucose levels, IV drug compatibility and access, daily tubing and CVC cap changes, and increased risk for CLABSI.45

Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an anticipated complication of allogeneic HCT that occurs in approximately 40-60% of HCT recipients.46 GVHD presents in both acute and chronic etiologies, and ranges in severity.47 Among HCT recipients, GVHD is associated with a 50% mortality rate and is one of the top three causes of death for HCT recipients.48,49 There are multiple evidence-based risk factors associated with the risk of GVHD, including advanced age, donor-recipient HLA-mismatch, the intensity of conditioning chemotherapy, and recipient presence of cytomegalovirus (CMV).47,50

Acute GVHD occurs when HCT donor-derived T lymphocytes produce a cytotoxic response against the host’s (i.e., patient’s) cells.51 Acute GVHD occurs within the first 100 days after HCT and leads to cellular damage generally in the GI tract, liver, and skin. Whereas chronic GVHD occurs beyond 100 days post-HCT and may present in HCT survivors up to two to three years, on average.52 The pathophysiology of chronic GVHD is less understood than in acute GVHD. However, evidence suggests that cooccurring effects from the patient’s new T lymphocytes and donor-derived T lymphocytes may influence chronic GVHD.53 Evidence shows chronic GVHD most commonly occurs in the skin, liver, and mouth, but may occur in the lungs, vagina, and other organs.54 See Table 4 for most frequently observed acute and chronic GVHD organ involvement and estimated incidence statistics. If acute or chronic GVHD is suspected, the TCT team will arrange for medical testing to confirm a diagnosis (e.g., endoscopy, skin biopsy, serum bilirubin tests).

Table 4.

Common Acute and Chronic GVHD Clusters and Incidence Estimate Percentages

Acute GVHD
(0-100 Days post-HCT)
Chronic GVHD
(> 100 days post-HCT)

Involvement Incidence (%) Involvement Incidence (%)
GI (Gut) 54-63% Skin 65-80%
Skin 15-35% Liver 40-73%
Liver 1-8% Eye 18-47%

Abbreviations: GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant.

Incidence statistics retrieved from: McDonald, 2016,59 Jacobsohn & Vogelsang, 2007,60 and Chao, 2019.61

Nurses have a significant role in assessing the onset of GVHD, delivering supportive care, and educating patients and caregivers. In the presence of acute and chronic GVHD, the nurse’s role amongst the interprofessional TCT team includes the assessment and grading of acute and chronic GVHD, and providing supportive care. For example, in the presence of acute GVHD of the GI tract, nursing assessments and interventions will encompass strict and accurate measurement of stool output, identifying signs of hemorrhage, and assessing and managing abdominal pain.

The go-to therapies for acute and chronic GVHD are corticosteroids, often prescribed in high-dose regimens, to yield an immunosuppressing effect.50 HCT recipients with chronic GVHD may be prescribed corticosteroids for up to three years post-HCT.55 Adherence to corticosteroids is an essential teaching point for TCT nurses to educate patients with chronic GVHD. Missed doses of corticosteroids may lead to worsening of symptoms, and tapering to lower doses may occur over 3-4 months. In older adults, the symptoms associated with long-term corticosteroid use include hypertension, hyperglycemia, infections, euphoria, osteoporosis, and easy bruising.50 Anti-infective prophylaxis is common during prolonged durations of high-dose corticosteroid use.50 Pharmacologic interventions to prevent GVHD following allogeneic HCT include low-dose methotrexate, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate among others.

Extracorporeal photopheresis.

One advanced intervention for patients with severe GVHD is extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP).55 During ECP, patients will have blood collected through apheresis, followed by separation of a small percentage of white blood cells (3-5%) and treatment with a photosensitizing medication (e.g., methoxsalen).55 Next, the ECP machine uses ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation to activate the medication and then re-infuses the treated white blood cells to the patient.55 The methoxsalen-treated white blood cells will produce an immune response that will mitigate the effects of chronic GVHD.56 The frequency and duration of ECP for GVHD treatment varies, and a clinical benefit may not be assessed until weeks into the therapy.

ECP is not delivered at all TCT settings. Education topics for nurses to deliver to patients undergoing ECP include infection prevention (for the CVC catheter), care of the CVC site, and adequate caloric intake. For patients undergoing ECP in the hospital, nurses’ may be responsible for a number of assessments and tasks, including administering packed red blood cells or intravenous electrolytes prior to treatment, and heparin-locking the CVC.57

Conclusion

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an effective, but high-risk and potentially curative therapy for older adults with leukemia. There are myriad of clinical complications and nursing considerations during HCT, including chemotherapy administration, supportive care for symptom management, infection prevention, and assessment of acute and chronic GVHD. Additional topics for nurses to consider for the older adult undergoing HCT include psychosocial support for the patient and caregiver, palliative and end-of-life care, nutritional support during the post-HCT phase, and the emergence of novel therapies to treat hematologic malignancies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Additional literature on these topics can be found in other papers in Seminars in Oncology Nursing. Nurses who are well-versed and competent in the broad roles involved before, during, and after an allogeneic HCT will optimally be able to meet the needs of patients’ and their caregivers.

Acknowledgments

Mr. Fauer is supported in part by a Doctoral Scholarship in Cancer Nursing (133507-DSCN-19-048-01-SCN) from the American Cancer Society; the Jonas Scholars Program; and the Hillman Scholars Program in Nursing Innovation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the acknowledged organizations.

References

  • 1.Schleisman A, Devine H, DeMeyer E, et al. Blinatumomab: A New Treatment for Adults With Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2003;19(2):476–480. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E168-E179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johns A Overview of bone marrow and stem cell transplantation. J Intraven Nurs. 1998;21(6):356–360. http://proxy.lib.umich.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107157017&site=ehost-live&scope=site. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Franco T DAG Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1994;10(1):3–11. http://proxy.lib.umich.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107443605&site=ehost-live&scope=site. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.D’Souza A, Fretham C. Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT): CIBMTR Summary Slides, 2018. https://www.cibmtr.org. Published 2018 Accessed March 26, 2019.
  • 5.Malogolowkin MH, Hemmer MT, Hale GA, et al. Outcomes following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for patients with relapsed Wilms ‘ tumor : a CIBMTR retrospective analysis. 2017;(April):1–7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rogers B Advances in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in older adult patients. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(3):E168–79. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E168-E179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Modi D, Deol A, Ayash L, et al. Age does not adversely influence outcomes among patients older than 60 years who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for AML and myelodysplastic syndrome. Bone marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1530–1536. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peffault de Latour R, Brunstein CG, Porcher R, et al. Similar overall survival using sibling, unrelated donor, and cord blood grafts after reduced-intensity conditioning for older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(9):1355–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schurman C Understanding blood & marrow transplantation. Stanford Nurse. 2008;28(1):2–6. http://proxy.lib.umich.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105772660&site=ehost-live&scope=site. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.NCI. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms Published 2019. Accessed April 18, 2019.
  • 11.Fisher V, Barnes Y, Nuss S. Pretransplant conditioning in adults and children: dose assurance with intravenous busulfan. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006;33:E36–43. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.E36-E43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gyurkocza B, Sandmaier BM. Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation : one size does not fit all. Blood. 2014;124(3):344–354. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-514778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kimmel Cancer Center. Haploidentical transplantation. Johns Hopkins Univ. 2019. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/centers/bone_marrow_transplant/haploidentical_transplantation.html Accessed April 18, 2019.
  • 14.Wood WA, Abemethy AP, Giralt SA. Pretransplantation Assessments and Symptom Profiles: Predicting Transplantation-Related Toxicity and Improving Patient-Centered Outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(4):497–504. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shabbir-moosajee M, Lombardi L, Ciurea SO. An overview of conditioning regimens for haploidentical. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(6):541–548. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Atilla E, Atilla PA, Demirer T. A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity / Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balk Med J. 2017;34:1–9. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jethava YS, Sica S, Savani B, et al. Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(11):1504–1511. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pirschel C What is the role of the interprofessional team in a BMT unit? ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/what-is-the-role-of-interprofessional-teams-in-a-bmt-unit Published 2018. Accessed April 18, 2019.
  • 19.Arora M, Sun C, Ness KK, et al. Physiologic Frailty in Nonelderly Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients Results From the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study. JAMA Oncol. 2016;35233(10):1277–1286. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abel GA, Klepin HD. Frailty and the management of hematologic malignancies. 2018;131(5):515–525. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-746420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults : Evidence for a Phenotype. J Gerontol. 2001;56(3):146–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang L, Olin RL. Emerging therapeutic modalities for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults. J Geriatr Oncol. 2017;8(6):417–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, Soubeyran PL. Screening older cancer patients : first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–2172. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rockwood K, Song X, Macknight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):9–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106(8):2912–2919. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International society of geriatric oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(24):2595–2603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levy S, Shamir C, Abu-Shakura N, Or R, Sapir G. Reinforcing staff communication to improve symptom management in post bone marrow transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:S513–S514. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed13&NEWS=N&AN=71830627. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thom KA, Li S, Custer M, et al. Successful Implementation of a Unit-based Quality Nurse to Reduce Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(2):139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.08.006.Successful. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McDonald M, Culos K, Gatwood K, Prow C, Chen H, Savani B. Defining Incidence and Risk Factors for Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in an Outpatient Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Program. Biol blood marrow Transplant. 2018;24(10):2081–2087. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hughes G A simple introduction to pharmacokinetics: Part 1. Nurse Prescr. 2014;12(10). doi: 10.12968/npre.2014.12.10.497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kaweida J, Kalariya N, AM G, BS A, Myers A. Unique challenges in blood monitoring for oncology nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019;23(2):191–196. doi: 10.1188/19.CJON.191-196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Polovich M Minimizing Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Agents. J Infus Nurs. 2016;39(5):307–313. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Friese C, Yang J, Mendelsohn-Victor K, Mccullagh MC. Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve Nurses’ Hazardous Drug Handling. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(2):248–256. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.248-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fuchs J, Hengstler J, Jung D, Hitl G, Konietzko J, Oesch F. DNA damage in nurses handling antineoplastic agents. Mutat Res Toxicol. 1995;342(1-2):17–23. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Hazardous drug exposures in health care. Workplace safety and health topics. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Staley EM, Schwartz J, Pham HP. Transfusion and Apheresis Science An update on ABO incompatible hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016;54(3):337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jun S, Hoon C, Kim S, Kim Y, Wook J, Jihyang L. Efficacy of three consecutive therapeutic plasma exchanges in major ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Apher. 2018;(February):1–6. doi: 10.1002/jca.21680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kimura F, Kanda J, Ishiyama K, Yabe T, Yoshifuji K, Fukuda T. ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0496-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suddock J, Crookston K. Transfusion reactions. StatPearls. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Talamo G, Rakszawski KL, Witold BR, et al. Effect of time to infusion of autologous stem cells (24 vs. 48 h) after high-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Hematology. 2012;89(2):145–150. Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01795.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brown S, Faltus K. Hematologic malignancy education for stem cell transplantation nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2011;38(4):401–402. Doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.401-402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wright LG. Maculopapular skin rashes associated with high-dose chemotherapy: prevalence and risk factors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006;33(6):1095–1103. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.1095-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Di Maio M, Gallo C, Leighl NB, et al. Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(8):910–915. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Trivedi M, Martinez S, Corringham S, et al. Review and revision of clinical practice of using G-CSF after autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at UCSD. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2011;17(2):85–90. doi: 10.1177/1078155209354932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dissanaike S, Shelton M, Warner K, et al. The risk for bloodstream infections is associated with increased caloric intake in patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Crit care. 2007;11(5):R114 Doi: 10.1186/cc6167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barton-Burke M, Dwinell D, Kafkas L, et al. Graft-versus-host disease: A complex long-term side effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Oncology. 2008;22(11, Suppl):31–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jagasia M, Arora M, Flowers ME, et al. Risk factors for acute GVHD and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2012; 119: 296–307. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-364265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Anders V, Barton-Burke M. Graft versus host disease: Complex sequelae of stem cell transplantation In Ezzone S & Schmidt-Pokorny K (Eds.), Blood and marrow transplantation, principles, practice, and nursing insights (3rd ed., 147–173). Sudury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nassereddine S, Rafei H, Elbahesh E, et al. Acute graft versus host disease: A comprehensive review. Anticancer Res. 2017; 37(4):1547–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lipof J, Loh K, Dwyer K, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(6): 1–18. Doi: 10.3390/cancers10060179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ferrara JL, Antin J. The pathophysiology of graft-versus-host disease In Applebaum F, Forman S, Negrin R, et al. (Eds.) Thomas’ hematopoietic cell transplantation (4th ed., 208–221). Oxford, England: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee SJ, Flowers ME. Recognizing and managing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Hematology. 2008; 134–141. Doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2008.1.134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Woltz P, Castro K, Park BJ. Care for patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease: Review of the evidence. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2006; 10: 795–802. Doi: 10.1188/06.CJON.795-802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Horwitz ME, Sullivan KM. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood Reviews. 2006; 20: 15–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baker M, McKiernan P. Management of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2011; 15(4): 429–432. Doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.429-432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peritt D Potential mechanisms of photopheresis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biology of blood and marrow transplantation. 2006; 12(1, Suppl 2): 7–12. Doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu C, Schindler E, LeRoy M, et al. Safety and collection efficiency with a lower transfusion threshold for extracorporeal photopheresis in adult patients with graft-versus-host disease. VoxSanguinis. 2017; 112(4): 379–387. Doi: 10.1111/vox.12504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Irwin M, Johnson LA. Putting evidence into practice. A pocket guide to cancer symptom management. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology nursing society; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McDonald G How I treat acute graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract and liver. Blood. 2016; 127: 1544–1550. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-612747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jacobsohn DA, Vogelsang GB. Acute graft versus host disease. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2007; 2:35 Doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chao NJ. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and grading of acute graft-versus-host disease. UpToDate. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-diagnosis-and-grading-of-acute-graft-versus-host-disease Updated March 20, 2019 Retrieved May 7, 2019.

RESOURCES