Skip to main content
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):333–337. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1592

Pediatric congenital heart diseases: Patterns of presentation to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital

Surraiya Bano 1, Saleem Akhtar 2,, Uzma Khan 3
PMCID: PMC7150392  PMID: 32292429

Abstract

Objective:

To observe presentation of Pediatric congenital cardiac defects to the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

Methods:

This is a retrospective chart review of patients under the age of 16 years with congenital cardiac defects presenting to the Emergency Department of Aga Khan University Hospital over a period of eighteen months, from January 2012 to June 2013. Study population was divided into two groups; first group constituted children with undiagnosed congenital cardiac defects, whereas second group constituted children with diagnosed congenial cardiac defects presented to ED. In previously diagnose cases each visit was counted as a separate encounter.

Results:

Out of 133 children, 44 (33.5%) were diagnosed congenital cardiac disease for the first time (Group-1) in ED, while 89 (66.5%) children were diagnosed cases of congenital heart disease (Group-2). Among Group-1; main reasons for ED visits were cyanosis, cardiac failure, murmur evaluation and cardiogenic shock where as in Group-2; main presentations were cardiac failure, hyper cyanotic spells, gastroenteritis, lower respiratory tract infection, and post-operative issues. There were total 13 deaths.

Conclusion:

High index of suspicion is necessary for early diagnosis and management of children with congenital heart disease in the pediatric emergency department.

KEYWORDS: Congenital cardiac defects, Emergency department, Pediatrics

INTRODUCTION

Congenital cardiac defects are the most frequently occurring birth defect with an incidence of 4.6 to 12.2/1000 live births.1,2 Congenital heart diseases in pediatric population have a varied spectrum of presentation, especially when it comes to emergency presentation of these ailments.3 0.5% to 10% of pediatric emergency room admissions are related to cardiac pathologies where congestive cardiac failure being the most prevalent of all. These affected children fall into two broad categories, the first one are those with undiagnosed cardiac defects. These defects manifest with symptoms like congestive heart failure (CHF), cyanosis, arrhythmias or cardiogenic shock. The second category belongs to children with known underlying cardiac pathologies.4 This category present with more generalized symptoms where the disease is precipitated by some parallel illnesses making the challenge even more arduous for emergency physicians.5

There is a plethora of studies describing the pathophysiology and treatment of congenital heart diseases in the medical literature. However, only a handful of studies have looked at the clinical presentation of these conditions to the Emergency department (ED).6,7 Particularly there is quite a dearth of such data in Pakistan. Therefore, this retrospective chart review of all pediatric congenital cardiac diseases was carried out in order to delineate their ED manifestations at our institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical record of all children who visited the Emergency Department of Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH - ED) over a period of eighteen months, from January 2012 to June 2013. Aga Khan University Hospital is a tertiary care teaching hospital, located in the city of Karachi, Pakistan, serving over a 15 million of population. The Emergency department at Aga Khan University Hospital is a 54 bedded unit both for adult and pediatric population with an annual census of 50,000 patients for both the populations. The trained Emergency Medicine faculty is available for supervision till midnight at the hospital.

The institution provides impeccable pediatric cardiology services based on three full time faculty members and a well-established fellowship program where three trainees are available round the clock. The department has its own portable echocardiography machine facilitating the diagnosis processes in the ED.

Inclusion criteria

All the children under the age of 16 years (which is cut off age used in the pediatric ED of the study hospital) with congenital heart anomalies presenting acutely to ED were included in the study.

The study population was divided into two groups; the first one consisted of children with known cardiac defects who presented to emergency department either due to complication of their underlying cardiac problem or with some non-cardiac problem e.g. pneumonia, gastroenteritis, fever etc. The second one constituted children with undiagnosed congenital heart disease. In previously diagnose cases each emergency room visit was counted as a separate encounter.

Data collection

Data was collected by a trained research officer. It included information related to patients’ demographics, presenting complaints, emergency department diagnoses for current admission. Moreover, in the previously diagnosed group information regarding the underlying cardiac defect, history of previous cardiac surgeries either corrective or palliative, any post-operative complications, and final disposition of patients was also taken into account. Data was entered in EpiData Version 3 and was analyzed using SPSS 19.

RESULTS

Out of 21,000 pediatric patients seen in the emergency department during the study period, 133 children were found to have congenital heart disease which actually constituted our study population. The male to female ratio of patients was 1.4:1 (76 males and 57 females). The median age of the patients was 4.9 months with range of 0 day to 13 years. The mean length of in hospital stay was 5.6±7.3 days.

Out of 133 children, 44 (33.5%) were diagnosed as congenital heart disease (CHD) in the emergency department for the first time while 89 (66.5%) children were already known to have congenital heart disease when presented to emergency department during our study period. Patients who were newly diagnosed were more likely to present at an early age (less than 1 week) p < 0.001 (Table-I). There were total 13(10%) deaths in hospital.

Table-I.

Patient demographics in children with congenital heart disease.

Demographics Newly diagnosed CHD (44) n (%) Diagnosed CHD (89) n (%) P-Value
Age:
<1 week 18(41) 02(2) < 0.001
1-4 week 07(16) 05(6)
4-8 week 11(25) 17(19)
2 - 12 months 7(16) 29(33)
1 - 5 years 00(0) 17(19)
>5 years 1(2) 19(21)
Gender
Male 29(66) 47(53)
Female 15(34) 42(47)
Cardiac lesions
Left – right shunt lesions
VSD 13(29.5) 30(33) 0.390
ASD 02(4.5) 18(20) <0.05
PDA 03(7) 03(3) 0.30
Endocardial cushion defect 01(2.27) 06(7) 0.26
Aorticopulmoanry window 01(2.27) 00(0.0)
Left sided obstructive lesions
Aortic stenosis 01(2.27) 01(1) 0.50
Coarction of aorta 00(2.27) 01(1) 0.66
Interrupted aortic arch 02(4.5) 00(0) 0.10
Right sided obstructive lesions
Tetrogy of Fallot 01(2.27) 11(12) <0.05
Pulmonary atresia 03(7) 05(6) 0.52
Tricuspid atresia 00(0.0) 03(3) 0.3
Transposition of great arteries 09(20.4) 03(3) <0.01
Truncus arteriosus 02(4.5) 00(1) 0.10
Pulmonary venous abnormalities 02(4.5) 03(3) 0.53
Complex cardiac defects 04(9) 05(6) 0.34

Characteristics of newly diagnosed CHD patients (n=44)

Eighty-two percent cases presented within 2 months of age, 41% of which presented in 1st week of their life whereas rest were between 2nd -8th weeks old.

The clinical features at the time of presentation in these patients are shown in Fig.1. Twenty-three cases (53.3%) had cyanotic while 21 patients (46.6%) had cyanotic heart disease. Eleven (25%) patients had duct dependent congenital heart defect and required prostaglandin infusion. Out of those 11 patients with duct dependent lesions; six (13.6%) patients had d-Transposition of great arteries (TGA) leading to inadequate inter circulatory mixing, two (4.5%) patients with pulmonary atresia, two had interrupted aortic arch and one had critical aortic stenosis (Table-I).

Fig.1.

Fig.1

Acute manifestation of cardiac defects in group 1 (newly diagnosed).

There were six deaths in newly diagnosed CHD patients. One patient died in ED had TGA with sepsis while rest in other areas of hospitals. The patients who died include two children with TGA and one each with Tausig-Bing anomaly, truncus arteriosus, interrupted aortic arch.

Characteristics of patients with known CHD (n=89)

Majority of the children presented after two months of age. Fourteen (15.7%) of known CHD children visited emergency department more than once during the study period making total of 106 visits by these 89 children. The pattern of presentation in these patients is shown in Fig.2.

Fig.2.

Fig.2

Acute manifestation of cardiac defects in group 2 (known cases).

These visits were mainly due to cardiac failure (28%) and respiratory tract infections (23%) and followed by gastroenteritis (11%). There were total seven (8%) deaths in this group of children, five (6%) occurred within a week of hospitalization while two (2%) occurred within four weeks of hospitalization.

DISCUSSION

This study presents a descriptive analysis of acute manifestations of CHD in children in ED in order to familiarize with common presentations of such conditions which eventually help make precise diagnosis and accurate management of such ailments. The patients were divided into two broad categories according to existence CHD (children with known heart defects and others with new diagnosis of cardiac defects).

In both groups; cardiac failure was the main underlying diagnosis although the pathophysiology is different in both groups. Cardiac failure is a common presentation in patients with congenital heart diseases. In patients with duct dependent systemic circulation, when ductus arteriosus closes, it causes severe cyanosis or cardiogenic shock while in other cardiac defects for example; left to right shunt defects or with increased pulmonary blood flow patients will present with cardiac failure and in such patients respiratory distress could be the presenting complaints. Similar presentations were also found in studies done by Lee et al. and Savitky et al.4,8

PGE infusion was required in 25% of our patients. Lee et al. has also reported incidence of 23% duct dependent congenital heart diseases in their study.4 PGE infusion is critical for survival of patients with duct dependent pulmonary or systemic circulation.9-13 Any critically ill newborn in which duct dependent cardiac pathology is suspected should be started on PGE1 infusion immediately pending further evaluation.12,14-18

Majority of our patients in both groups had left to right shunt defects and among them VSD was the main cardiac defect. Results are comparable with other reported studies.17 Ventricle septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital cardiac defect as noted in various studies and accounts for 25% of all congenital heart defects.19,20 Also in our study VSD was the most common lesion.

In Group-1 more patients presented in neonatal and infancy period with cyanotic cardiac defects where as in Group-2; age of presentation to ED was found to be more than Group-1 due to pre -dominant left to right shunt defects as described by Lee et al.4 Majority cyanotic heart defects are duct dependent and present early, so is the patient population in our study.

In the previously diagnosed group, congestive cardiac failure, pneumonia and Tet spell were seen in younger sub set whereas older children presented with more diverse pathologies like brain abscess, digoxin toxicity, post-operative complications, etc. Similar presenting complaints were also noted in study done by Lee et al.4 in which the Group-2 (already diagnosed group of patients) was further divided according to age and underlying conditions which we did not. Another study done by Savitsky et al.8 showed that in newly diagnosed group, most patients presented with cardiac failure where as in previously diagnosed group majority presented with cardiac failure and respiratory tract infection and worsening cyanosis (Tet spell).

Limitations of the study

Limitation of our study consisted of it being a retrospective study (using chart review). Therefore, patients, who were discharged, transferred out or who left against medical advice could not be followed compared to patients who were admitted in our hospital.

CONCLUSION

Emergency physicians must recognize common presentations of the common congenital cardiac defects in order to diagnose and treat these complex conditions.

Author’s Contribution:

SB: Conceived, designed and writing up the paper.

SA: Data collection and manuscript writing, responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work.

UK: Review and data analysis.

Footnotes

Grant support and financial disclosure: None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kapoor R, Gupta S. Prevalence of congenital heart disease, Kanpur, India. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45(4):309–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sun PF, Ding GC, Zhang MY, He SN, Gao Y, Wang JH. Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease among Infants from 2012 to 2014 in Langfang, China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130(9):1069–1073. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.204923. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.204923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silberbach M, Hannon D. Presentation of congenital heart disease in the neonate and young infant. Pediatr Rev. 2007;28(4):123–131. doi: 10.1542/pir.28-4-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee YS, Baek JS, Kwon BS, Kim GB, Bae EJ, Noh CI, et al. Pediatric emergency room presentation of congenital heart disease. Korean Circ J. 2010;40(1):36–41. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2010.40.1.36. doi:10.4070/kcj.2010.40.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kabbani N, Kabbani MS, Al Taweel H. Cardiac emergencies in neonates and young infants. Avicenna J Med. 2017;7(1):1–6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.197506. doi:10.4103/2231-0770.197506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edelson JB, Rossano JW, Griffis H, Dai D, Faerber J, Ravishankar C, et al. Emergency Department Visits by Children With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(15):1817–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.055. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Frazier A, Hunt EA, Holmes K. Pediatric cardiac emergencies:Children are not small adults. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(1):89–96. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.76842. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.76842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Savitsky E, Alejos J, Votey S. Emergency department presentations of pediatric congenital heart disease. J Emerg Med. 2003;24(3):239–245. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00753-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Massin MM, Malekzadeh-Milani SG, Van Aerschot I, Dessy H. Management of cardiac emergencies in children. Minerva Pediatr. 2009;61(2):163–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mejia EJ, O'Connor MJ, Lin KY, Song L, Griffis H, Mascio CE, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Heart Failure-Related Emergency Department Visits in the United States:A Population-Based Study. J Pediatr. 2018;193:114–118.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.009. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hunt EA, Brunetti M, Nelson KL, Shilkofski NA, Peddy SB. Recognition and initial management of cardiac emergencies in children. Minerva Pediatr. 2009;61(2):141–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Woods WA, McCulloch MA. Cardiovascular emergencies in the pediatric patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005;23(4):1233–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2005.07.003. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heymann MA, Berman W, Jr, Rudolph AM, Whitman V. Dilatation of the ductus arteriosus by prostaglandin E1 in aortic arch abnormalities. Circulation. 1979;59(1):169–173. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.1.169. doi:10.1161/01.cir.59.1.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sharieff GQ, Wylie TW. Pediatric cardiac disorders. J Emerg Med. 2004;26(1):65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tibbles CD, Bouton M, Lucas JM, Harper M, Horwitz C, Fisher J. Emergency department management of pediatric patients with cyanotic heart disease and fever. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(3):599–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.030. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yee L. Cardiac emergencies in the first year of life. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(4):981–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2007.08.001. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwedler G, Lindinger A, Lange PE, Sax U, Olchvary J, Peters B, et al. Frequency and spectrum of congenital heart defects among live births in Germany:a study of the Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011;100(12):1111–1117. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0355-7. doi:10.1007/s00392-011-0355-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kramer HH, Sommer M, Rammos S, Krogmann O. Evaluation of low dose prostaglandin E1 treatment for ductus dependent congenital heart disease. Eur J Pediatr. 1995;154(9):700–707. doi: 10.1007/BF02276712. doi:10.1007/bf02276712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890–1900. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Begic H, Tahirovic H, Mesihovic-Dinarevic S, Ferkovic V, Atic N, Latifagic A. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of congenital heart disease in children in Tuzla Canton, Bosnia-Herzegovina. Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(3):191–193. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1125-3. doi:10.1007/s00431-002-1125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Professional Medical Publications

RESOURCES