Abstract
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a bloodborne virus which can be transmitted via percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposure to infected body fluid. Healthcare workers (HCWs) who are continuously exposed to different body fluids are at an increased risk of contracting and transmitting this virus. It is thus important to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of HCWs towards HBV and the prevalence of HBV infection among them.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was carried out between April and September 2017. Overall, 398 HCWs were recruited for this study. Knowledge on the route of HBV transmission and attitude towards HBV were evaluated using a well-structured questionnaire. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity was obtained using the Monolisa HBsAg ULTRA kit (Bio-Rad). Data were analysed using SPSS V.20.
Results
Among the HCWs who participated in this study, 338 (84.9%) had heard of HBV, and 269 (67.6%) of them had adequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission. Medical doctors were the most knowledgeable among biomedical workers and students (76.5%). The rate of stigma was highest among nurses (87, 38.8%). The prevalence of HBsAg positivity was high (42, 10.6%) given that there is an efficient and available vaccine. Overall, over 70% of HCWs invited to participate in this study responded.
Conclusion
Knowledge on the route of HBV transmission was fair, and the level of stigmatisation of HBV-infected patients and the prevalence of HBV infection were high in this study. A sensitisation campaign should be carried out to educate HCWs on HBV, thus reducing the level of stigma associated with HBV as well as the probability of contracting HBV as a nosocomial infection.
Keywords: health care workers, HBV, HBsAg, attitude, knowledge, Cameroon
Strengths and limitations of this study.
The Monolisa HBsAg ULTRA ELISA kit, which has 100% sensitivity and 99.28% specificity, was used to determine current hepatitis B virus infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity).
Questionnaires were answered in the presence of the researcher to prevent participants from discussing answers or getting answers online.
Stratified sampling technique, which permits estimation of population parameters for groups within a population, was used for sampling.
Information on knowledge and attitude was self-reported, and chances of individual bias cannot be completely over-ruled.
The present study covers a cross section of health professionals, so caution should be taken while generalising the results.
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an enveloped virus of the Hepadnavirus family that infects the liver, causing hepatocellular necrosis and inflammation. HBV, spread by percutaneous or mucosal exposure to infected blood and various body fluids, can cause either an acute or chronic disease.1 An estimated 257 million people are living with HBV,2 and about 20%–30% of those who become chronically infected will develop complications. Currently available treatments fail to eradicate the virus in most of those treated, necessitating potentially lifelong treatment,3 and approximately 650 000 people die annually due to chronic hepatitis B.3 Cameroon, a sub-Saharan African country, is considered hyperendemic, with a prevalence rate of HBV infection estimated at 11.5%.4
Healthcare workers (HCWs), who are frequently in contact with blood and other body fluids in the course of their work, are at a higher risk of exposure to bloodborne viral diseases such as HBV, hepatitis C virus and HIV.5–7 Among the HCWs worldwide, about two million are exposed and about 70 000 are infected with HBV annually.7 The WHO global burden of the disease showed that 37% of HBV among HCWs was due to occupational exposure resulting from sharp injuries.2 More than 90% of these infections occur in developing countries.7 The risk of occupational infections in developing countries is intensified by a variety of factors, comprising but not restricted to overcrowding in hospitals, lower HCW to patient ratio, insufficient or absence of basic safety and protection equipment, reutilising/reprocessing contaminated needles and sharp instruments, and partial awareness of the risk of exposure to blood and body fluid.5
Although needle stick injury hepatitis seroconversion is somewhat rare, the costs of treatment and the anxiety about the possible consequences of an exposure are serious. This might be why some HCWs refuse to service patients with bloodborne viral diseases such as HBV. Prevention through immunisation and increasing knowledge thus stand out as the safest strategy against the high prevalence of viral hepatitis among HCWs. Knowing the facts and having proper awareness can influence the attitudes of HCWs and control the menace of the disease.8 A number of studies in Africa have evaluated the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of HCWs towards HBV and their vaccination status.9–12 The low level of vaccination and the high prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) recorded in different studies might be justified by the low level of knowledge on the route of transmission among HCWs.13–16
Prevention remains a recommended safeguard against an epidemic of viral hepatitis. The knowledge and attitudes of the clinician play a key role in the prevention and spread of infection. By knowing the facts and having proper awareness and attitudes, the menace of this disease can be prevented to a great extent. Therefore, the objectives of the present study are to assess the knowledge and attitudes of HCWs regarding HBV and to compare their knowledge and attitude score with the prevalence of HBV infection.
Materials and methods
Study design and setting
This cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted among HCWs in Bamenda Health District, North West Region (NWR), Cameroon. Samples were collected between April and September 2017, and included 22 health facilities in this health district (one regional hospital, three CMAs (Centre medical d’arrondissement), six mission hospitals, five government health centres and seven private hospitals). Over 70% of HCWs in the various health facilities were recruited for this study. Testing stations were set up in the various wards of the health facilities.
Study participants
HCWs present in the selected hospitals during the study period were informed and invited to participate in the study. HCWs in the study comprised medical doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, laboratory technicians, sanitary workers and biomedical students working in Bamenda Health District during the study period.
Strategy for recruiting target population
Information was given through the chief medical doctor (where applicable), the general supervisor and the heads of units, who were contacted respectively and were asked to inform their staff of the project. An information notice was placed on the hospital and ward notice board, where applicable, to inform the hospital staff of the study objectives and the period during which the study was to be carried out. Finally, a one-to-one contact was used to reach a number of staff.
Sample size and justification
Sample size was determined using the population proportion sample size formula proposed by Scott Smith13: X=Z-score×SD×(1−SD)/MOE. The proportion of HCWs in NWR was obtained from a registry published in 201514 which published the national proportions of HCWs per region. The confidence level was 95%, giving a Z-score of 1.96, a margin of error (MOE) of ±5 and an SD of 0.5. Using this formula, the calculated sample size was 385 persons.
Sample collection
Participants who consented to the study completed a structured questionnaire which was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, HBV exposure risk, HBV vaccination and attitude towards HBV. Stratified sampling technique, which permits estimation of population parameters for groups within a population, was used for sampling. The questionnaire was self-administered and contained both closed and open-ended questions to assess the perspectives of the respondents on HBV. Participants who could read and write completed the form by themselves, while those who could neither read nor write were assisted. The questionnaire was filled in the presence of the researcher to prevent participants from discussing answers or getting answers online. Predesigned and pretested, semistructured questionnaire items with response options were developed based on KAP (knowledge, attitude and practice/prevalence) surveys with similar objectives.15–17 The questionnaire was validated following the guidelines proposed by Jain et al.18 Serum was obtained from 4 mL of blood collected from study participants into a red cap (dry) tube. Identification number was used to link participants’ laboratory results and the questionnaire. The questionnaire can be found in online supplementary file.
bmjopen-2019-031075supp001.pdf (386.6KB, pdf)
Definition for scoring knowledge
Knowledge on the route of HBV transmission was assessed using three questions directly linked with the route of HBV infection. Adequate knowledge was when a correct answer was given to all three questions. This minimum of three of three correct answers to define good level of knowledge may seem rigorous. However, this minimum level justified the reasonable difficulty of the questions.
Definition for scoring attitude
Attitude was assessed using six criteria: attitude towards HBV-infected persons, quality of hygiene (how often HCWs wash and/or disinfect their hands), frequency of glove use, frequency of needle stick injury, sexuality and vaccination status. Attitude was considered positive when a participant was able to correctly give at least five of the six expected answers. Having five of the six responses correct is deemed to have a positive attitude, as HCWs are at the forefront of healthcare provision and should have appropriate attitude towards HBV for others in the population to emulate.
HBV serology
HBsAg was tested using the Monolisa HBsAg ULTRA ELISA kit (Bio-Rad, Marnes-La-Coquette, France), a fully multivalent assay with high sensitivity in detecting HBV mutants to determine those who were positive for HBsAg.6 ELISA assay was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS V.20.0 for Windows. Descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics, percentages for categorical variables, and median and IQR for continuous variables were used to analyse the findings of the study. Pearson’s χ2 (p<0.05) was used to assess the significance among the study variables, while OR was used to evaluate the strength of association between various variables.
Patient and public involvement statement
Patients and the public were not involved in designing the questionnaire, and collecting and analysing data for this study.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants
In each health facility in Bamenda Health District, over 70% of HCWs consented to participate in this study. Overall, a total of 398 HCWs across Bamenda Health District participated in this study. Among these, 272 (68.3%) were women. The (16–25) years old age group was the most represented (167, 42.0%), and the median age was 27.0 years (IQR, 23–32 years) at 95% CI (table 1). Most participants were nurses (56.6% of workers and 55.7% of students), had worked for 2–4 years and lived in an urban setting (84.2%).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the studied population
| Variables | Frequency (n) (N=398) | Percentage | |
| Sex |
Male | 126 | 31.7 |
| Female | 272 | 68.3 | |
| Age group (years) |
16–25 | 167 | 42.0 |
| 26–35 | 157 | 39.4 | |
| 36–45 | 50 | 12.6 | |
| 46–65 | 24 | 6.0 | |
| Level of education |
Secondary and below | 39 | 9.8 |
| Diploma | 59 | 14.8 | |
| SRN/SRM | 55 | 13.8 | |
| HND | 103 | 25.9 | |
| BSc | 118 | 29.6 | |
| Postgraduate | 24 | 6.0 | |
| Duration in the occupation (years) |
≤1 | 72 | 18.1 |
| 2–4 | 218 | 54.8 | |
| 5–9 | 55 | 13.8 | |
| ≥10 | 53 | 13.3 | |
| HCW category |
Nurses | 224 | 56.3 |
| Lab technicians | 90 | 22.6 | |
| Medical doctors | 17 | 4.3 | |
| Dentists | 15 | 3.8 | |
| Pharmacists | 8 | 2.0 | |
| Sanitary workers | 44 | 11.1 | |
| Role in the hospital | Biomedical student | 149 | 37.4 |
| Biomedical personnel | 249 | 62.6 | |
| Residence |
Urban | 335 | 84.2 |
| Semiurban | 18 | 4.5 | |
| Rural | 45 | 11.3 | |
HCW, healthcare worker; HND, Higher National Diploma; SRN/SRM, State Registered Nurse/Midwife.
Assessment of knowledge
A total of three questions were used to assess knowledge of HCWs from different hospitals in this region on the route of HBV transmission (table 2). Of the participants, 338 (84.9%) had heard of HBV. Most participants correctly identified sexual intercourse (313, 78.6%), mother-to-child transmission (292, 73.4%) and contact with body fluid (324, 81.4%) as routes of contamination with HBV. Among these, the medical doctors were the most knowledgeable regarding HBV (13, 76.5%), while not up to 50% of sanitary workers had heard of HBV before this study (table 3). Knowledge was significantly associated with level of education and HCW category (p<0.001). Overall, these HCWs had an unsatisfactory level of knowledge on the route of HBV transmission (269, 67.6%). Knowledge on the route of HBV transmission was higher among biomedical students (104, 69.8%) compared with the personnel (165, 66.3%).
Table 2.
Knowledge on the route of HBV transmission
| Questions | Correct response, n (%) | |||||||
| Nurses (n=224) | Medical doctors (n=17) | Lab technicians (n=90) | Dentists (n=15) | Pharmacists (n=8) | Sanitary workers (n=44) | Total (N=398) | ||
| Heard of HBV | Yes | 199 (88.8) | 16 (94.1) | 86 (95.6) | 12 (80.0) | 5 (62.5) | 20 (45.5) | 338 (84.9) |
| No | 25 (11.2) | 1 (5.9) | 4 (4.4) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (37.5) | 24 (54.5) | 60 (15.1) | |
| Sexually transmitted | Yes | 183 (81.7) | 16 (94.1) | 82 (91.1) | 11 (73.3) | 3 (37.5) | 18 (40.9) | 313 (78.6) |
| No | 41 (18.3) | 1 (5.9) | 8 (8.9) | 4 (26.7) | 5 (62.5) | 26 (59.1) | 85 (21.4) | |
| Vertical transmission | Yes | 179 (79.9) | 14 (82.4) | 69 (76.7) | 9 (60.0) | 5 (62.5) | 16 (36.4) | 292 (73.4) |
| No | 45 (20.1) | 3 (17.6) | 21 (23.3) | 6 (40.0) | 3 (37.5) | 28 (63.6) | 106 (26.6) | |
| Contact with body fluids | Yes | 191 (85.3) | 15 (88.2) | 84 (93.3) | 11 (73.3) | 5 (62.5) | 18 (40.9) | 324 (81.4) |
| No | 33 (14.7) | 2 (11.8) | 6 (6.7) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (37.5) | 26 (59.1) | 74 (18.6) | |
| Knowledge on HBV | Yes | 162 (72.3) | 13 (76.5) | 68 (75.6) | 9 (60.0) | 3 (37.5) | 14 (31.8) | 269 (67.6) |
| No | 62 (27.7) | 4 (23.5) | 22 (24.4) | 6 (40.0) | 5 (62.5) | 30 (62.2) | 129 (32.4) | |
HBV, hepatitis B virus.
Table 3.
Prevalence of HBV infection among HCWs
| Characteristics | Knowledge on the route of transmission | Positive attitude | HBsAg positivity | ||||
| n (%) | P value | n (%) | P value | n (%) | P value | ||
| Sex | Male (n=126) | 88 (69.8) | .513 | 61 (48.4) | .224 | 9 (7.1) | .132 |
| Female (n=272) | 181 (66.5) | 114 (41.9) | 33 (12.1) | ||||
| Age group (years) | 16–25 (n=167) | 118 (70.7) | .169 | 74 (44.3) | .456 | 14 (8.4) | .532 |
| 26–35 (n=157) | 109 (69.4) | 72 (45.9) | 19 (12.2) | ||||
| 36–45 (n=50) | 29 (58.0) | 17 (34.0) | 5 (10.0) | ||||
| 46–65 (n=24) | 13 (54.2) | 12 (50.0) | 4 (16.7) | ||||
| Level of education | Secondary and below (n=39) | 11 (28.2) | <.001 | 14 (35.9) | .186 | 3 (7.7) | .771 |
| Diploma (n=59) | 36 (61.0) | 23 (39.0) | 6 (10.2) | ||||
| SRN/SRM (n=55) | 36 (65.5) | 22 (40.0) | 9 (16.4) | ||||
| HND (n=103) | 79 (76.7) | 42 (40.8) | 10 (9.7) | ||||
| BSc (n=118) | 88 (74.6) | 64 (54.2) | 12 (10.2) | ||||
| Postgraduate (n=24) | 19 (79.2) | 10 (41.7) | 2 (8.3) | ||||
| Duration in the occupation (years) | ≤1 (n=72) | 45 (62.5) | .649 | 30 (41.7) | .217 | 7 (9.7) | .601 |
| 2–4 (n=218) | 157 (72.0) | 101 (46.3) | 23 (10.6) | ||||
| 5–9 (n=55) | 34 (61.8) | 21 (38.2) | 7 (12.7) | ||||
| ≥10 (n=53) | 33 (62.3) | 23 (43.4) | 5 (9.4) | ||||
| HCW category | Nurses (n=224) | 162 (72.3) | <.001 | 87 (38.8) | .003 | 28 (12.5) | .640 |
| Lab technicians (n=90) | 68 (75.6) | 54 (60.0) | 8 (8.9) | ||||
| Medical doctors (n=17) | 13 (76.5) | 9 (52.9) | 1 (5.9) | ||||
| Dentists (n=15) | 9 (60.0) | 9 (60.0) | 2 (13.3) | ||||
| Pharmacists (n=8) | 3 (37.5) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | ||||
| Sanitary workers (n=44) | 14 (31.8) | 14 (31.8) | 2 (4.5) | ||||
| Biomedical students (n=149) | 104 (69.8) | .466 | 65 (43.6) | .914 | 13 (8.7) | .359 | |
| Biomedical personnel (n=249) | 165 (66.3) | 110 (44.2) | 29 (11.6) | ||||
| Residence | Urban (n=335) | 229 (68.4) | .523 | 152 (45.4) | .408 | 38 (11.3) | .492 |
| Semiurban (n=18) | 10 (55.6) | 6 (33.3) | 1 (5.6) | ||||
| Rural (n=45) | 30 (66.7) | 17 (37.8) | 3 (6.7) | ||||
Bold P value <.05 is considered statistically significant.
HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCW, healthcare worker; HND, Higher National Diploma; SRN/SRM, State Registered Nurse/Midwife.
Attitude of HCWs towards HBV
Among the 398 HCWs, 270 (67.8%) had a positive attitude towards HBV-infected persons (table 4). Majority of HCWs practised safe hygiene (washed their hands often and/or used a disinfectant) (317, 79.6%) and wore gloves often (310, 77.9%) while administering treatment. Needle stick injury was highest among sanitary workers (3, 6.8%), while promiscuity (defined as having more than 10 sex partners in their lifetime, having sex with sex worker(s) and/or one-night stands) was highest among dentists (6, 40.0%). Only 93 (23.4%) HCWs reported receiving at least one dose of the vaccine, while 175 (44.0%) showed an overall positive attitude towards HBV (table 3). There was a significant association between HCW category and attitude towards HBV (p=0.003) (table 3).
Table 4.
Attitude of healthcare workers towards hepatitis B virus
| Attitudes | Healthcare workers, n (%) | |||||||
| Nurses (n=224) | Medical doctors (n=17) | Lab technicians (n=90) | Dentists (n=15) |
Pharmacists (n=8) | Auxiliary workers (n=44) | Total (N=398) | ||
| Attitude towards infected persons | Good | 137 (61.2) | 13 (76.5) | 70 (77.8) | 13 (86.7) | 5 (62.7) | 32 (72.7) | 270 (67.8) |
| Bad | 87 (38.8) | 4 (23.5) | 20 (22.2) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (37.5) | 12 (27.3) | 128 (32.2) | |
| Practise safe hygiene | Yes | 193 (86.2) | 14 (82.4) | 63 (70.0) | 14 (93.3) | 6 (75.0) | 27 (61.4) | 317 (79.6) |
| No | 31 (13.8) | 3 (17.6) | 27 (30.0) | 1 (6.7) | 2 (25.0) | 17 (38.6) | 81 (20.4) | |
| Wears gloves often | Yes | 177 (79.0) | 15 (88.2) | 82 (91.1) | 10 (66.7) | 4 (50.0) | 22 (50.0) | 310 (77.9) |
| No | 47 (21.0) | 2 (11.8) | 8 (8.9) | 5 (33.3) | 4 (50.0) | 22 (50.0) | 88 (22.1) | |
| Frequency of needle stick injury | Often | 10 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.8) | 14 (3.5) |
| Rarely | 214 (95.5) | 17 (100.0) | 89 (98.9) | 15 (100.0) | 8 (100.0) | 41 (93.2) | 384 (96.5) | |
| Received one dose of vaccine | Yes | 43 (19.2) | 4 (23.5) | 28 (31.1) | 10 (66.7) | 3 (37.5) | 5 (11.4) | 93 (23.4) |
| No | 181 (80.8) | 13 (76.5) | 62 (68.9) | 5 (33.3) | 5 (62.5) | 39 (88.6) | 305 (76.6) | |
| Sexually promiscuous | Yes | 46 (20.5) | 4 (23.5) | 10 (11.1) | 6 (40.0) | 2 (25.0) | 16 (36.4) | 84 (21.1) |
| No | 178 (79.5) | 13 (76.5) | 80 (88.9) | 9 (60.0) | 6 (75.0) | 28 (63.6) | 314 (78.9) | |
| General attitude | Positive | 87 (38.8) | 9 (52.9) | 54 (60.0) | 9 (60.0) | 2 (25.0) | 14 (31.8) | 175 (44.0) |
| Negative | 137 (61.2) | 8 (47.1) | 36 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) | 6 (75.0) | 30 (68.2) | 223 (56.0) | |
Prevalence of HBsAg among HCWs
The prevalence of HBsAg positivity was 10.6% (table 3). No statistically significant association was observed between HBsAg positivity and the different classes involved in this study (table 3). Majority of those infected belonged to the 46–65 years age group (4, 16.7%), had worked for (5–9) years (7, 12.7%), had a State Registered Nurse/Midwife certificate (9, 16.4%), were nurses (28, 12.5%) and lived in an urban setting (38, 11.3%). No significant association was observed between knowledge on the route of HBV infection, attitude towards HBV and being positive for HBsAg (table 4). However, the prevalence of HBsAg positivity was higher among those with adequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission (26, 61.9%) and lower among those with a positive attitude towards HBV (19, 45.2%) (table 5).
Table 5.
Association between knowledge, attitude and prevalence of HBsAg
| Characteristics | Reactivity to HBsAg | Unadjusted risk of HBsAg | ||||
| n | % | P value | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Knowledge (n=42) | Adequate | 26 | 61.9 | .405 | 1.323 | 0.683 to 2.564 |
| Poor | 16 | 38.1 | ||||
| Attitude (n=270) | Positive | 19 | 45.2 | .861 | 0.994 | 0.497 to 1.795 |
| Negative | 23 | 54.8 | ||||
P value <.05 is considered significant.
HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen.
Discussion
Exposure to bloodborne pathogens such as HBV infection remains a significant occupational hazard to HCWs, especially in countries where the prevalence of this infection is high. KAP studies among HCWs are necessary to evaluate and improve awareness on the route of transmission, prevention and management of infectious diseases. This study was carried out to assess the knowledge, attitude and prevalence of HBV among HCWs in Bamenda Health District, NWR, Cameroon.
Assessment of knowledge
HCWs are at the forefront of healthcare provision, and it is expected that they know the routes of transmission of different infectious agents to protect their patients and themselves from nosocomial infections. The results of the current study revealed a significant association between HCW category, level of education and knowledge on the route of HBV transmission. This is similar to what was obtained in Sierra Leone,11 Sudan19 and Northeast Ethiopia.20 This may be justified by the fact that education trains individuals to acquire, evaluate and use information.21 This may justify the unequal access to and exploitation of educational resources, which increase with level of education22 as well as role in the health setting.
Even though majority of HCWs in this setting had heard of HBV infection prior to this study (338, 84.9%), only 269 (67.6%) had good knowledge on the route of HBV transmission. This is similar to the 62.5% obtained in Northern Tanzania9 and the 58.7% obtained in the South West Region of Cameroon.23 However, this is higher than the 47.0% obtained in Yaoundé among HCWs,24 52% obtained in North West, Ethiopia,10 29.9% obtained in Sierra Leone,11 and 42.1% obtained in a rural population in NWR, Cameroon.25 According to Abongwa et al,25 the most probable reason for the low level of adequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission could be inadequate health education programmes, forcing the population to get information on HBV from friends and/or relatives.25 Getting information from friends, relatives and/or colleagues increases the probability of getting inappropriate information.
The level of current HBV infection was higher among those who had an adequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission (26, 61.9%). This is contrary to what is anticipated15 given that better knowledge on the route of disease transmission should help the individual take precautions against getting an infection. The disparity observed in this study can be explained by the same principle underlined above: inadequate health education programmes forcing the population to get information on HBV from friends, relatives and/or colleagues.22 This can thus justify the fact that most of the infected HCWs were chronic carriers who, after their first diagnosis or exposure to HBV, were directed to gastroenterologist for follow-up. Gastroenterologists also have the role of educating their patients on the disease.
Assessment of attitude of HCWs towards HBV
There was a significant association between HCW category and attitude towards HBV (p=0.003). Even though 270 (67.8%) HCWs had a positive attitude (behaviour) towards HBV-infected persons, only 175 (44.0%) showed an overall positive attitude towards HBV. The poor attitude of the majority of HCWs towards HBV in this study may be justified by the level of inadequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission in this population.8 15
The prevalence of current HBV infection was lower among those with a positive attitude towards HBV (19, 45.2%). Developing a positive attitude towards a disease is generally associated with acquiring adequate knowledge on that disease, as discussed earlier.8 15 This might justify the lower prevalence of current HBV infection among those with positive attitude towards HBV.
Prevalence of HBV among HCWs
Various epidemiological and cross-sectional studies have reported marked variation in the prevalence of HBsAg among HCWs. Studies carried out among HCWs in Africa showed a prevalence of 1.8% in Libya,26 2.9% in Rwanda,27 7.0% in Tanzania28 and 8.1% in Uganda.29 This study revealed a relatively high burden of current HBV infection (10.6%) among HCWs in Cameroon. The high prevalence of HBV in this study population is similar to the HBV prevalence obtained in a similar study carried out in Yaoundé,24 but higher than the 8.7% obtained in a national survey among HCWs.30 The difference in the prevalence of HBV could be due to the different diagnostic techniques used. The high prevalence of HBV infection obtained among HCWs in Cameroon may be a reflection of the prevalence of HBV infection in the general Cameroonian population, which is estimated at 11.5%,4 or the lack of adequate knowledge on the route of HBV transmission among these HCWs.15
The prevalence of HBV positivity was low in the (16–25) years age group and could be justified by the expanded immunisation between 1990 and 2005, which led to a decrease in HBV infections in most regions particularly in central sub-Saharan Africa.31 Furthermore, most students were in the (16–25) years age group and thus had just started working in health facilities.
This was a cross-sectional study, which implies that participants were met only once. There was no follow-up to determine the outcome of the infection. Besides, data on knowledge and attitude were self-reported and could be subject to individual bias. Finally, no serological test was performed to evaluate the level of vaccination coverage in this at-risk population. This implies that the number of HCWs immuned against HBV is lower than what is reported in this study. This negative attitude among HCWs can be justified by the high cost of the vaccine, the lack of adequate supply and/or the simple fear of receiving the vaccine provoked by the many myths surrounding vaccination in some settings.32
Conclusion
The level of knowledge on the route of HBV transmission observed in this study is fair. This lack of adequate knowledge might justify the relatively high prevalence of HBsAg positivity, the overall negative attitude towards HBV and the low rate of vaccination among HCWs in this area. Given that knowledge is usually the first step towards modification of a desirable behaviour, HBV campaigns should be organised to sensitise HCWs on this disease. The campaign can include improved mass media programmes, such as broadcasting health talk intermittently online and/or within other television programmes. Adequate sensitisation will reduce the rate of stigma associated with the disease and probably the rate of new infections among HCWs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge all HCWs who consented to participate in this study; Mr Ripa of CPC for helping out with part of the benchwork; Dr Akassong Dominique Dinga W for helping with the purchase of material; RHB for permitting the blood sample to be stored in the RHB laboratory freezer during sample collection; and the students of the CPC virology laboratory for going through this work.
Footnotes
Contributors: EA and CT designed the study. EA and VF performed the experiments. EA drafted the manuscript. CT, RN, LA and J-RK were involved in editing the manuscript. EA performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
Ethics approval: Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the National Ethics Committee of Cameroon (N°2017/02/871/CE/CNERSH/SP). Authorisation to carry out research in the NWR was obtained from the regional delegation. Authorisation to access different hospitals was obtained from the directors or the person in-charge of the hospitals. Authorisation to access health centres was obtained from the district medical officer (DMO) and the chief of centres of the health facilities in this region. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement: Data are available in a public, open access repository (https://doi.org /10.6084/m9.figshare.9641771).
References
- 1.Kathleen D, Kathleen D. Hepatitis B: causes, symptoms and treatment. Medical News Today, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO Updated fact sheet: hepatitis B. Geneva, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization, Global Hepatitis Programme . Guidelines for the prevention, care, and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. Geneva: WHO, 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/154590/1/9789241549059_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Njouom R, Tejiokem M, Texier G, et al. O-02: prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C and hepatitis D virus infections in Cameroon: results from a national population based survey (the ANRS 12289 project). J Viral Hepat 2015;22. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tarantola A, Abiteboul D, Rachline A. Infection risks following accidental exposure to blood or body fluids in health care workers: a review of pathogens transmitted in published cases. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:367–75. 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dement JM, Epling C, Ostbye T, et al. Blood and body fluid exposure risks among health care workers: results from the Duke health and safety surveillance system. Am J Ind Med 2004;46:637–48. 10.1002/ajim.20106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.WHO Health care worker safety. Geneva: WHO, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reis C, Heisler M, Amowitz LL, et al. Discriminatory attitudes and practices by health workers toward patients with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria. PLoS Med 2005;2:e246 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shao ER, Mboya IB, Gunda DW, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and associated factors among healthcare workers in northern Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2018;18:474 10.1186/s12879-018-3376-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abeje G, Azage M. Hepatitis B vaccine knowledge and vaccination status among health care workers of Bahir Dar City administration, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:30 10.1186/s12879-015-0756-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Qin Y-L, Li B, Zhou Y-S, et al. Prevalence and associated knowledge of hepatitis B infection among healthcare workers in Freetown, Sierra Leone. BMC Infect Dis 2018;18:315 10.1186/s12879-018-3235-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahmed Elmukashfi Elsheikh T, Balla SA, Abdalla AA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Heath care workers regarding transmission and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection, white Nile state, Sudan, 2013. Am J Health Res 2016;4:18–22. 10.11648/j.ajhr.20160402.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith SM. Determining-Sample-Size. Qualtrics 2013;7. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tandi TE, Cho Y, Akam AJ-C, et al. Cameroon public health sector: shortage and inequalities in geographic distribution of health personnel. Int J Equity Health 2015;14:43 10.1186/s12939-015-0172-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.ul Haq N, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, et al. A cross sectional assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards hepatitis B among healthy population of Quetta, Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2012;12:692 10.1186/1471-2458-12-692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Al-Thaqafy MS, Balkhy HH, Memish Z, et al. Improvement of the low knowledge, attitude and practice of hepatitis B virus infection among Saudi national guard personnel after educational intervention. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:597 10.1186/1756-0500-5-597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Setia S, Gambhir R, Kapoor V, et al. Attitudes and awareness regarding hepatitis B and hepatitis C amongst health-care workers of a tertiary hospital in India. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2013;3:551–8. 10.4103/2141-9248.122105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jain S, Dubey S, Jain S. Designing and validation of questionnaire. Int Dent Med J Adv Res 2016;2:1–3. 10.15713/ins.idmjar.39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mustafa ASM, Ahmed ASM, Alamin TAA, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of hepatitis (B) among healthcare workers in relation to their vaccination status in Khartoum, Sudan, 2015: a cross-sectional study. Sudan J Med Sci 2018;13:22–32. 10.18502/sjms.v13i1.1686 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Demsiss W, Seid A, Fiseha T. Hepatitis B and C: seroprevalence, knowledge, practice and associated factors among medicine and health science students in northeast Ethiopia. PLoS One 2018;13:e0196539 10.1371/journal.pone.0196539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mirowsky J, Ross CE. Education, learned effectiveness and health. Lond Rev Educ 2005;3:205–20. 10.1080/14748460500372366 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zimmerma E, Woolf S, Haley A. Understanding the relationship between education and health: a review of the evidence and an examination of community perspectives. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ngekeng S, Chichom-Mefire A, Nde P, et al. Hepatitis B prevalence, knowledge and occupational factors among health care workers in Fako division, South West region Cameroon. Microbiol Res J Int 2018;23:1–9. 10.9734/MRJI/2018/40445 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tatsilong HOP, Noubiap JJN, Nansseu JRN, et al. Hepatitis B infection awareness, vaccine perceptions and uptake, and serological profile of a group of health care workers in Yaoundé, Cameroon. BMC Public Health 2016;16 10.1186/s12889-016-3388-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abongwa LE, Sunjo NS, Afah NG. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards hepatitis B among two rural communities of the Anglophone regions in Cameroon. IRA-Int J Appl Sci 2016;4:490 10.21013/jas.v4.n3.p13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Elzouki A-N, Elgamay SM, Zorgani A, et al. Hepatitis B and C status among health care workers in the five main hospitals in eastern Libya. J Infect Public Health 2014;7:534–41. 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kateera F, Walker TD, Mutesa L, et al. Hepatitis B and C seroprevalence among health care workers in a tertiary hospital in Rwanda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015;109:203–8. 10.1093/trstmh/trv004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mueller A, Stoetter L, Kalluvya S, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among health care workers in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:386 10.1186/s12879-015-1129-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ziraba AK, Bwogi J, Namale A, et al. Sero-prevalence and risk factors for hepatitis B virus infection among health care workers in a tertiary hospital in Uganda. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:191 10.1186/1471-2334-10-191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bilounga Ndongo C, Eteki L, Siedner M, et al. Prevalence and vaccination coverage of hepatitis B among healthcare workers in Cameroon: a national seroprevalence survey. J Viral Hepat 2018;25:1582–7. 10.1111/jvh.12974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, et al. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine 2012;30:2212–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.World Health Organization Myths and facts about immunization. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
bmjopen-2019-031075supp001.pdf (386.6KB, pdf)